part 2:
gkrieg pros:
897 consistent re: joseph. as in
1102.
1125 it's nice when the ic repeats what you say.
1204 is good.
cons:
891 smells like trying to be misleading.
bonus:
1137 dopey, but transparent.
iguana iguana pros:
937 i generally think scum wouldn't bother with this sort of thing.
1099, 1101 tunneling j reggie again. it's funny that it doesn't go anywhere, even after faust agreed.
1149 is fair, has been demonstrated not to be helping a scumpartner. as they said, though, they did the thing he asked.
1156 is transparent.
1165 thanx.
1186 is consistent with what he did i guess.
1321 i guess if he's scum, he has to have access to the vt claim, but that would be pretty likely.
cons:
916 emphasizes his towniness, seems too excited about it.
924 is some nice scumhunting, but doesn't stick to lalight i think.
942 making himself seem larger again, and making a big deal out of the townreads he said he was surprised by.
1047 waah look at me i'm town.
1053 why would that be more interesting than no one dying and a vig claim? not a fan of
1182, as i said already. kinda strawman-y.
1184 also seems like a "do it. you won't." that uh is a tad too confident.
the hammer is, of course, ultimately bad. i'm less harsh on it than i had been—he said he was gonna, gkrieg would have as well, etc—but it is still empirically bad that he did that. D3 sucked but we should have taken more time with it. faust never got to weigh in again.
1303 that doesn't explain why you were uniquely concerned about yourself, and not interested in sorting out ww's claim.
bonus:
1105 decisively untrue.
j reggie pros:
954 was against the grain of a mislynch. depends on ww, ofc.
cons:
1117 i'm trying my damnedest not to read into that trailing comma. he ignores lalight.
1129 shows that he's reading the accusatory posts, but he only responds to the one that has an easy response.
1132 the ic votes him, and like nothing becomes of it.
1152 "i'm town because i'm town," does not respond to faust.
1373 i'm town because i'm town. urgient call to arms is i guess justified, though.
bonus:
joseph pros:
1064 consistent with being doctor. as is
1135.
1240 waxes as a scumhunter. i uh don't appreciate his defense of me tho.
cons:
915 seems like more than is necessary, but depends how you look at it i guess.
1082 got baited, except then he voted gkrieg. wut.
1175 is irrelevant, could be looking for reasons to not lynch j reggie.
1232 agree with what lalight said after.
1243 barf. he gave a reason for j reggie, then voted sa, and didn't change it after learning that one of the points against sa was moot. not a fan. i don't think he had articulated much of a position against sa.
1256 apparently agrees with: joseph is bad, ll is bad, igu is weird.
1331 generic doctory thing to say.
bonus:
923, i dunno. i don't see why one would feel the need to do something goofy like that. same for
1078, seems like a setup to try to claim something later that didn't happen. to me it all feels like he got too excited when people said that he just always reads scummy; as if to say, "the reason all of you are getting a bad impression from me is that i'm ~weird~ and it's my ~meta~." somehow none of these culminated into a quick mislynch.
lalight pros:
907 consistent re: joseph.
1029 thanks for quoting the thing.
1233 nice callout.
cons:
943 "i'm so town."
1026 c'mon. it had only been an hour.
1170 we actually had <2 scums, and he was voting for the innocent, against the ic. and also angrily trying to speed this mislynch up.
bonus:
1063 i didn't really like that post either, but i guess there isn't much else to say if you're suddenly the center of attention.
1228 is his attitude about the game. unfortunately would cause him to be read a little negatively.
witherweaver pros:
997 the claim. supported by
51 (which is at least super-risky for fakeclaiming anything except vig, but might perhaps go un-noticed) and
974, as well as a mild amount of activity D1 and D2. i think that it's a super-risky thing to fake, and there has not messed up since the claim—and he's posted a lot. also, the fact that i believe gkrieg supports him as well (as i've said, the only scenario where i'd believe that ww fake claimed was if he knew for a fact that there were at least three VT rolls. the mvp is clear if it's not the case. the several posts at
D3 start are also putting himself out there a tad. in
1024 he isn't even that devoted to lynching sa which would be a large part of the point if he fakeclaimed.
1061 again supporting non-"sa is bulletproof" explanations.
1205 is good.
cons:
1260 i guess i understand that the two people that wanted to hammer were suspicious, but i mean, he was voting for sa as well.
bonus:
1177 that's what she said.
digging up graves:
958, for this reason i'm not reading into the rr lynch that much. i think it seemed like a good idea to pretty much all of the town as well as the scum. that said, the wagons are weird, and pull counter to my current scum reads. which is uh kinda annoying.
1211 sa believed ww,
1212 suspected lalight,
1221 believed gkrieg.
this look back has made me more believing of ww, slightly better on igu, slightly worse on lalight, about the same on gkrieg, the smallest tad more accepting of j reggie, and unchanged on joseph.
my cards are on the table. joseph has seemed scummy and distant for a while, which is not easy to survive with—it got rr killed
so fast.
vote: joseph