Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[iguanaiguana]

Iguana, were any of your questions for me?

You're a town.

[iguanaiguana]

Iguana, were any of your questions for me?

You're a town.

So uh, who are your scums in your head?

[faust]

Well isn't that fun. Let's tak about my wagon, shall we?

Obviously it's bullshit to think I play scummy. Anyone who has ever seen me play scum would know better, and, incidentally, everyone who's currently voting for me has. Well of course I could still be scum. But that would mean that scum!me is taking a pretty novel approach to the game. And, let's face it, nobody on my wagon has argued in that direction.

So what do we have?

Joseph's vote is just plain OMGUS. That isn't very telling guys; Joseph is an omgusy kind of player. So while his vote is bad as in it doesn't really make sense bad, it's not bad in the sense of this guy is totes scum.

Then we have the iguana. He expressedly voted for me because I'm more fluffy than usual. Which like isn't a scum tell at all unless you can provide more reasoning for why it would be. I mean, I have to say, igu came to this game quite solvy; for a D1, that's not what I'm expecting. I'm on the fence on whether he could keep up his lurky jokey unhelpful D1 persona as scum. The change to a more focused way of playing is unfortunately scummy, since it's what I expect from someone who's uncomfortable playing scum, and I know that iguana is.

gkrieg just votes without any kind of reason, which is kinda fine really. Looks like a pressure vote to me, that's a good townie thing. I also liked that post where he gave reasons for being townie, because I know these moments where you're town and go like, "oh, I'm so incredibly townie right now!", and so it's good for him that he can provide such examples.

mail-mi's vote is easily the worst of the bunch. He too votes me for being too fluffy, which again is just nonsense and a way to jump a wagon that might help scum get rid of a troublesome player. I mean it feels kinda in character with early mail-mi from some years ago, but what I've seen from him recently points to him being a lot less sheepy and more analytical nowadays, and that just doesn't fit with this vote.

Vote: mail-mi

[mail-mi]

@iguana: in a bit, when I'm home

@faust: it's day one and I've been paying more attention to BSG and Rewind than this one. I'm gonna do more stuff later but for now you're way more fluffy than usual, as if you feel the need to post as much as you usually do but with nothing to say cause you're scum, so it's a good place for my vote right now.

[Witherweaver]

@iguana: in a bit, when I'm home

@faust: it's day one and I've been paying more attention to BSG and Rewind than this one. I'm gonna do more stuff later but for now you're way more fluffy than usual, as if you feel the need to post as much as you usually do but with nothing to say cause you're scum, so it's a good place for my vote right now.

Faust doesn't post with nothing to say as scum, though.  He creates stuff to say.

[faust]

@iguana: in a bit, when I'm home

@faust: it's day one and I've been paying more attention to BSG and Rewind than this one. I'm gonna do more stuff later but for now you're way more fluffy than usual, as if you feel the need to post as much as you usually do but with nothing to say cause you're scum, so it's a good place for my vote right now.

Faust doesn't post with nothing to say as scum, though.  He creates stuff to say.

It's true. Though I guess you could argue that by posting kinda fluffy and attracting votes, I did create stuff to say. Anyway that's not the point anyone is making, which is bad.

[J Reggie]

@iguana: in a bit, when I'm home

@faust: it's day one and I've been paying more attention to BSG and Rewind than this one. I'm gonna do more stuff later but for now you're way more fluffy than usual, as if you feel the need to post as much as you usually do but with nothing to say cause you're scum, so it's a good place for my vote right now.

Faust doesn't post with nothing to say as scum, though.  He creates stuff to say.

It's true. Though I guess you could argue that by posting kinda fluffy and attracting votes, I did create stuff to say. Anyway that's not the point anyone is making, which is bad.

Are you saying people just aren't voting for you for the right reasons?

[Witherweaver]

Zing!

[J Reggie]

When everyone looks like town, probably Faust is scum.

This is actually an interesting point.  If you're having trouble getting scumreads, there's a good chance scum is among the more experienced players.

[Roadrunner7671]

When everyone looks like town, probably Faust is scum.

This is actually an interesting point.  If you're having trouble getting scumreads, there's a good chance scum is among the more experienced players.

Huh...that is interesting

[Roadrunner7671]

I haven't really thought about this game enough to make effective reads. I've read everything, but I really haven't absorbed the information, you know? So I'm just waiting for D2

[silverspawn]

When everyone looks like town, probably Faust is scum.

This is actually an interesting point.  If you're having trouble getting scumreads, there's a good chance scum is among the more experienced players.

If you take this theorem seriously day 1, you will not get useful results. Scum is not scumread day 1 all the time. Day 1 scumreads are townies plying scummy more often than not. Scum has no effect on those.

[schadd]

When everyone looks like town, probably Faust is scum.

This is actually an interesting point.  If you're having trouble getting scumreads, there's a good chance scum is among the more experienced players.

score!

[schadd]

townies plying scummy

you rang?

[mail-mi]

Iguana, were any of your questions for me?

You're a town.

i agree.

Iguana, were any of your questions for me?

You're a town.

So uh, who are your scums in your head?

Before reread: Faust, cause of fluff. These most recent post(s) haven't alleviated that read at all. You also make a point on him. WW a little bit, but only minorly. Uh... I don't really remember anything else. huh. I need to reread, it looks like.

[LaLight]

After M85 and M84 that I've been reading, I look at mail-mi closely. I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little but he's so very good when he's scum!

[mail-mi]

I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little

gambler's fallacy. Also, look at WW's first games. I think he was scum, what, 7 times in a row or so?

but he's so very good when he's scum!

Why thank you.

[LaLight]

I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little

gambler's fallacy. Also, look at WW's first games. I think he was scum, what, 7 times in a row or so?

but he's so very good when he's scum!

Why thank you.

You know that your words don't clear you? vote: mail-mi

[Joseph2302]

After M85 and M84 that I've been reading, I look at mail-mi closely. I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little but he's so very good when he's scum!

Actually, the odds of him being scum this game are the same as other games.

[LaLight]

After M85 and M84 that I've been reading, I look at mail-mi closely. I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little but he's so very good when he's scum!

Actually, the odds of him being scum this game are the same as other games.

yeah, but three in a row?

[silverspawn]

After M85 and M84 that I've been reading, I look at mail-mi closely. I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little but he's so very good when he's scum!

Actually, the odds of him being scum this game are the same as other games.

yeah, but three in a row?

Actually, the odds of him being scum this game are the same as other games.

[LaLight]

okay, you got me, I don't know much about probability theories, I'm in a minority of humanitarians on this site.

Nevertheless I didn't count this as "he can't be the scum three times in a row so he's town". It was just my (false) observation. I don't really trust him.

[mail-mi]

I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little

gambler's fallacy. Also, look at WW's first games. I think he was scum, what, 7 times in a row or so?

but he's so very good when he's scum!

Why thank you.

You know that your words don't clear you? vote: mail-mi

Uh I was never trying to clear myself. What about this post is scummy?

[LaLight]

I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little

gambler's fallacy. Also, look at WW's first games. I think he was scum, what, 7 times in a row or so?

but he's so very good when he's scum!

Why thank you.

You know that your words don't clear you? vote: mail-mi

Uh I was never trying to clear myself. What about this post is scummy?

I was suspecting you because of the faust wagon, and I told you something to see your response.

I was waiting from town!you to sat something like you're good when you're town too. But you just told "thank you" and that is something scum!you would've said.

[iguanaiguana]

I know that the odds of being scum 3 games in a row are little

gambler's fallacy. Also, look at WW's first games. I think he was scum, what, 7 times in a row or so?

but he's so very good when he's scum!

Why thank you.

You know that your words don't clear you? vote: mail-mi

Uh I was never trying to clear myself. What about this post is scummy?

I was suspecting you because of the faust wagon, and I told you something to see your response.

I was waiting from town!you to sat something like you're good when you're town too. But you just told "thank you" and that is something scum!you would've said.

Town frame of mind here folks.