I thought day2 and still think that Voltaire's defense of Liopoil was very flimsy. It really read to me like he had a vested interest in not being on the Liopoil wagon.
In the above post defending Liopoil, Voltaire's major reasoning for not being on the Lio wagon is that he thinks Lio is engaging in legitimate scumhunting. Sure.
Anyway, Voltaire, what do you make of my point that, "Lio looks like he's been scumhunting" isn't a valid defense of Lio. Do you agree with that?
It's actually a pretty good point, but you and mail-mi are strong scum reads.
Here we have Voltaire agreeing that Liopoil appearing to be scumhunting isn't a great defense of Liopoil because of the setup of the game. So, Voltaire's main earlier stated reasoning for depending Liopoil is gone.
Now Voltaire shifts his defense to the fact that too many people are willing to lynch Liopoil, which I don't buy, especially when exactly five players indicated that they would be willing to lynch Lio.
At no point does Voltaire ever specifically address the cases presented by Shraeye, myself, or others. He just throws out vague defenses, and when one defense got shot down, immediately slid to another.
I know that Lio did flip town, so it's not the most incriminating evidence towards Voltaire, but he really does appear to me to have made a decision to appear off-wagon for the Lio lynch. I initially thought that it was because he was Lio's scumbuddy, but that's obviously not the case now. But I think he could be scum trying to get towncred for opposing a mislynch.