So... little... talking.
Well most of the rest of us were pretty involved with some crazy stuff in another game.
What is your excuse? Or rather, what have you done to increase the amount of talking except to note that we aren't?
Uh, I think I've brought up a lot of stuff. I want to know what other people think about claiming. I would love to get some reaction to my contention that mail-mi is scum. And also my suspicion of you, which is less than my suspicion of mail-mi but certainly second most. I've come to shraeye's defense and sort of backed off nkirbit with reason.
I need to reread mail-mi, but my sorting of suspicious people after lio's flip and seeing the nightkills definitely has mail-mi and yuma looking more suspicious.
Once again I am asking why?
I mean really? Why? Is it just based off the idea that I wasn't night killed and thus must be mafia? Is that your whole argument. Because if so it misses a crucial piece. That mafia knows this. I do have an established meta where if I am not dead by day3 I am scum. But it isn't an accurate meta. And it is a meta that favors scum tremendously when I am town. All they have to do to get me mislynched on day3 (and at a likely critical juncture) is to keep me alive...
Looking back at games; i grabbed the normal ones. yuma was scum in Masons/monks, mean girl and was alive until the end in both. yuma town in Bankers, Grujah's game, ninjas, simpleMafia...he was nightkilled night 4 in Bankers, N1 in ninjas. lived in the other two games for 3 days in each.
The last time you were lynched seems ages ago. I think I remember that happening in DS9. so your meta of being a mislynch if you're alive at day3 is not really supported by anything other than your word.
But both DS9 and Masons further show my point. In those games I was scum. And I was alive til the end in both (lynched correctly the last day of DS9). But in both of those games there was an opposing scum faction who elected to not kill me. If I am such a major threat to scum because I am a world class scum hunter why didn't those factions kill me off?
I never said I had a meta of being mislynched day3 if alive, but there is a meta of that general concept and has been mentioned numerous times by players (ashersky specifically seems to mention it quite a bit). Look, I am not going to be able to win this argument by showing off how many times I have been mislynched. Why? Because I don't get mislynched. Ever. I have been mislynched a grand total of 1 time in Masquerade.
But what I am trying to explain is that just because I live out through a game doesn't automatically make me mafia.
To expand on your thinking:
Harry Potter - town; lived until the end (why wasn't I killed by mafia here?)
Simple Game - town: lived until the end (why wasn't I killed by mafia here?)
Pirates II - town: lived until the end (why wasn't I killed by mafia here?)
Mean Girls - mafia: lived until the end
Ninjas - town: died night1 (finally a game where mafia killed me. Why because I was obviously town pushing the day1 wagon on scum correctly)
Bankers - town: lived til late mid game (why wasn't I killed earlier?)
Masons and Monks - mafia (lived til the end, but why not killed by other faction?)
DS9 - mafia (lived til basically the end, but why not killed by other faction?)
Major Arcana II- town: Night killed night2
Buffy - town: Lived until the end (why wasn't I killed by mafia here?)
Switch mafia - town: lived until the basically the end (why wasn't I killed by mafia earlier?)
Chicken mafia - mafia: lived until the end
Masquerade - town: lived for a long time, ultimately lynched mid game.
Major Arcana - town: Night killed night2
Pirates - town: night killed night4
Doctor Mafia - mafia - lived until the end
III - mafia lived until basically the end.
So basically what I am saying is that there are slew of games where I have survived until the late game and not been mafia. and I don't like that people are suggesting that I am mafia solely based off that evidence. Because it is faulty as demonstrated above.