I started this re-read much earlier this afternoon (i.e. in the morning, forum-time-wise), but it got put to one side while I got stuff done. The post counts were correct at whatever points I re-loaded the whole-thread view for a particular read, so they're not all taken at the same point in time.
LaLight (41 posts): Lots of early-game scum-reads and accusations, which isn't quite his usual friendly self. Weird townreading logic at #236. Feels a bit defensive. Then goes totally VLA for four days. Leaning scummier than I'd remembered.
Galzria (31 posts): Surprisingly little early-game content (like before #400). Spends a lot of time defending gkrieg. Null.
gkrieg (31 posts): I really don't like how the case against him has been characterised as being all about the punctuation. I remain suspicious of him, and would like him to engage with my point, rather than letting WW do the work for him. Also, gkrieg seemed to be half-defending RR when the wagon starts up, but then jumped right on.
2.71828..... (48 posts): Seems townie for his enthusiasm for the claiming stuff. He's been really burned by claiming exercises before as scum.
Archetype (8 posts): So little here! Is there a VLA in effect? I'd accuse him of fluff-posting with the highlighting of my unintentional pun, except that he also put something game-relevant in the same post, so I think it feels like he's trying to participate. Very null.
Teproc (22 posts): Townie for pushing claiming in a way that I think benefits town.
Witherweaver (74 posts!): Huge number of posts, though most of them are tiny. I find his lack of quoting makes it hard to sit some of his comments in their right context, so I could misinterpret things easily, but I don't think I'm seeing anything that scummy. I don't get why he's the big alternative to gkrieg.
IDontPlayThisGame (7 posts): Wow, virtually no content, but currently VLA. I remember town!IDP being considerably more proactive at scum-hunting.
Datswan (25 posts): Newbie to me at least. Not really said as much as the post count ought to indicate. Seems a bit hesitant/flakey on votes, but that might be a newbie thing. Nullish.
Qvist (14 posts): Also a new-to-me person, also someone with very little in the early game. Pretty much the same boat as Datswan.
RoadRunner (35 posts): Admits to artificially inflating his post count :-P Has been VLA. Seems to be flaily town for D1. I always think he's not the most pro-town person around, and then he gets lynched and turns out to have been town after all. So town for now to avoid that mess for the time being.
faust (53 posts): He's active in scum-hunting and making people stay accountable, which is good. I dislike the aggressive bit a lot, but I'm not sure it's indicative of alignment. The fact he's not trying to kill off me or gkrieg (or other logic-y people?) is encouraging at least.
SpaceAnemone -- spaaaaaace :-) Only 16 posts, though, which is fewer than I'd thought, even given VLA-ness.
Iguanaiguana (28 posts): I still find the lack of early accountability worrying for the poisoner thing. That can be solved when we see how things look in D3, though, so he's a pretty poor vote choice for today.
Jimmmmm (27 posts): Active early, then less active once his level of activity was pointed out. Doesn't seem very committed.
O (51 posts): Way more active than I'd realised. O's lack of avatar really doesn't work for my visual memory! I feel like he's behaving in the "play to have fun" style he got tunneled by Awaclus for in M100. I do still think that sort of jokiness benefits scum more than town, but I don't think there's other evidence to think he's scum yet.
Okay, as I say, I started this some hours ago and didn't get around to finishing it. Now gkrieg has posted a reasonably satisfactory explanation of the wording thing I was unhappy with, and I'm swinging round to putting him into the maybe-townie box. In contrast, my re-read didn't leave me with warm fuzzies over LL, so I'm going to follow gkrieg and vote: LL instead.