Grujah: You say you are against no-lynch, but give no reasoning. Do you think the proponents of no-lynch are scummy? If so, why haven't you voted Cayvie (the original proponent of no-lynch)?
I hate to say it, given my position on it, but I think if scum are weighing in at all on no lynch, they're more likely in the "against it" group. Particularly if their night powers are enough to effect a kill on a "lynched' player but not one in full health.
Here's an interesting thing (so I can contribute SOMETHING before my extended V/LA starts)
Pro-Mass claimEevee (sort of, suggested but said he wasn't advocating)
Grujah (calls me scum for opposing it)
CF (says he'll consider it and it's less bad, but never really advocates it)
timchen (at least for quasi-VTs)
Anti Mass ClaimJotheonah (first to come out against it)
Voltgloss (doesn't outright say it, but asks a lot of critical questions)
cayvie (concerned about name effects)
Robz
Tables
yuma
Dsell
Eevee (some time later. Interesting how Eevee is on both lists)
Insomniac
Pro No lynchcayvie
shark bait
Tables
timchen
Robz
Anti No Lynchjtotheonah (sort of. I asked why people thought it was a good idea)
Dsell (at least not right away)
Insomniac
Grujah
Eevee
CF
shark bait (changed his mind)
So, provided with that list, y'all can decide what the "scum side" of each of those issues is and look to see who ended up on both scum sides. I imagine scum wold be pro-massclaim (since knowing all the town's powers puts them in a very powerful position) and anti-no lynch. So I have to
FoS: CF, Eevee, and Grujah. Obviously it's not enough to vote on, but it's interesting.
Also, on an unrelated note, for science!
Vote: Axxle(I want to see if the embargo has disappeared or just the token)