Still trying to decide if I'm more of a Robz or a CF when it comes to voting, that is to say "don't vote until you're reasonably certain" or "vote early, vote often".
Hmm... what the hell. Chances are one of the Mafia is new and/or lurking. I know that one isn't me, and I'm finding theorel's reasoning to be very transparent - he's answered my questions in a way that makes sense to me. I said before I was suspicious of SFS, but I'm less so since Robz drew him out and he defended himself. I can sympathize with him suspecting no one, since I kind of feel the same way, though I'm now taking small suspicions and forcing myself to look at them in a better light.
Tables is kind of lurking, but I'm getting the sense he's just overwhelmed. So that leaves Grujah. looking at the posts theorel has highlighted, I can see his point - he posts a lot of short posts, jumps on a lot of bandwagons, and seems to lack strong convictions. It could be overexcited town play, but it reads more like overexcited scum play, i.e. "let me put more votes on whoever has votes so someone gets lynched."
Am I sold? No. But given that 1. we ought to lynch someone today and these's no one I'm certain of, 2. there's a pretty good chance one pops voter is Mafia, since the Mafia would want to hedge their bets, and 3. there's a pretty good chance, statistically, that one of the new or less active players is scum, Grujah seems like a good bet for me to place. I am, of course, fully open to changing this vote when and if someone else looks more suspicious.
Nothing personal.
VOTE: GRUJAH