this is (and also was last time) the list i disagree most with. i legitimately believe that sir vander is the strongest knight, either that or a close second after dame anna, and I really don't understand why people don't see it. Both players buy knights, they kill each other, boom you have a huge advantage. really, getting this guy seems so imporant.
dame anna is an all or nothing thing, sometimes you trash twice and basically won the game, other times it's just useless. but it's rare for any other knight to have that big of an impact.
sir micheal is on the other hand is... pretty bad, really. not the weakest knight, but somehwere below average. i mean, +2$ is generally better than a discard attack, and even more so in knights games, and sylvia is #7.
at least dame josephine is rightfully on the last rank. i also had her at #10 last time, and it was not close. +2 vp is just awful, most of the time you don't keep it and then it does nothing, and if you keep it it's not even that great.