Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Another little etiquette question  (Read 3939 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WanderingWinder

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5275
  • ...doesn't really matter to me
  • Respect: +4387
    • View Profile
    • WanderingWinder YouTube Page
Another little etiquette question
« on: June 13, 2012, 10:06:28 am »
0

So, recently I was playing a game with a seemingly pretty reasonable-minded opponent, there is possession and a discard attack, and we have this interchange (name removed for his protection, as well as which discard attack it is, to make it a little harder for you to sneak out and find out)

16:15 OPPONENT: have you a good hand??
16:15 OPPONENT: or you discard good cards?
16:15 OPPONENT: ^
16:15 OPPONENT: tell me please :p
16:16 OPPONENT: i played 3[discard attacks] so you should have discard good cards...
16:16 OPPONENT: i dont like bluff!
16:16 WanderingWinder: why would I tell you?
16:16 OPPONENT: i know
16:19 OPPONENT: gg
16:19 WanderingWinder: gg



So what happens is, he plays a discard attack against me, and he wants to know whether I've kept a hand that is good, in which case he should possess me, or which is crummy, in which case it serves him better not to. Now of course, the uncertainty about this is huge when you're in my position, i.e. the one under this combination of threats.
Do people think this is acceptable? I mean, It's not really a huge huge deal, because well, I just don't tell him. But it's just sort of an annoying, needling, whining, and seems a bit unsportsmanlike to me. But I guess maybe bridge players out there would think this is par for the course?
Thoughts?

cherdano

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 166
  • Respect: +54
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2012, 10:12:30 am »
0

It's not ok, but I am not sure I would have much sympathy for anyone complaining who answered him... Not a big deal anyway.
Logged

Ozle

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3625
  • Sorry, this text is personal.
  • Respect: +3360
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2012, 10:41:24 am »
0

I wouldn't mind an opponent asking, but I would mind an opponent insisting or begging or hassling about it.
Logged
Try the Ozle Google Map Challenge!
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=7466.0

Sullying players Enjoyment of Innovation since 2013 Apparently!

rrenaud

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 991
  • Uncivilized Barbarian of Statistics
  • Respect: +1197
    • View Profile
    • CouncilRoom
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2012, 10:45:58 am »
+3

You should tell him that you love cookies, and ask him if he has baked any good cookies recently.
Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2012, 10:47:19 am »
+1

I wouldn't mind an opponent asking, but I would mind an opponent insisting or begging or hassling about it.
Same.

However, if you play in real life, your opponent can always see the top card of your discard pile which makes it easier to know if your hand is good or bad.

If he plays Margrave 3 times, for instance, he will get too see 3 cards out of the 4 you discarded.
If I recall correctly, Iso doesn't show this, but I've not payed enough attention to it to be sure.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Qvist

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2400
  • Shuffle iT Username: Qvist
  • Respect: +4085
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2012, 10:53:30 am »
0

I wouldn't mind an opponent asking, but I would mind an opponent insisting or begging or hassling about it.

In real life, I wouldn't have any problems with it.
That's just as you're in a heads up in Poker and ask "So, do you have a good hand?"
I don't expect an answer, but if I see a reaction, it might tell me something.
On isotropic it doesn't work that way, but if someone ask me that, I would answer something like "Who knows? Maybe" and I don't mind.
But if he kept asking, that would be annoying.

Ozle

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3625
  • Sorry, this text is personal.
  • Respect: +3360
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2012, 10:59:30 am »
0

You should tell him that you love cookies, and ask him if he has baked any good cookies recently.

Even if I dont like cookies?
Logged
Try the Ozle Google Map Challenge!
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=7466.0

Sullying players Enjoyment of Innovation since 2013 Apparently!

Kahryl

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
  • Respect: +155
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2012, 11:25:38 am »
0

I think it depends on the seriousness of the match. In a tournament that behavior would be outrageous. In casual friendly games I think it's acceptable to "wear your heart on your sleeve" so to speak as long as you don't get crazy about it (and he didn't)
Logged

Marin

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30
  • Respect: +143
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2012, 11:34:08 am »
+3

WOW!
Don't know that you take it so harsh!!
Sorry, I perfectly knew that you have not to answer!(and that you had right to not answer!)
I was just thinking, and I didn't know really what to do...
I was just trying to make a joke (I said "try", I see that it was really not a "good" joke!).
Trust me, I asked so many times because I was thinking and was a bit frustrated and not because I was waiting for a answer!
And yes again  I am sorry, next time i will learn to shut up...
Logged

WanderingWinder

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5275
  • ...doesn't really matter to me
  • Respect: +4387
    • View Profile
    • WanderingWinder YouTube Page
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2012, 11:39:38 am »
0


Trust me, I asked so many times because I was thinking and was a bit frustrated and not because I was waiting for a answer!


This was the point - I feel that you have no right to expect an answer.

theory

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3603
  • Respect: +6125
    • View Profile
    • Dominion Strategy
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2012, 11:41:11 am »
+2

I think it is perfectly possible to construe Marin's statements as joking around.  I have often made similar light-hearted comments ("Darn, I wish I knew what you discarded") while thinking.  The problem with the Internet is that sometimes such humor is difficult to detect.
Logged

popsofctown

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5477
  • Respect: +2860
    • View Profile
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2012, 11:43:08 am »
0

I suspect Marin speaks English as a second language and his humor didn't come across quite the way he wanted.
Logged

WanderingWinder

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5275
  • ...doesn't really matter to me
  • Respect: +4387
    • View Profile
    • WanderingWinder YouTube Page
Re: Another little etiquette question
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2012, 11:45:15 am »
0

I think it is perfectly possible to construe Marin's statements as joking around.  I have often made similar light-hearted comments ("Darn, I wish I knew what you discarded") while thinking.  The problem with the Internet is that sometimes such humor is difficult to detect.
That he was meaning it jokingly I thought was very possible - it's why I didn't post his name in the thread to start with.
Tone is everything, and how things come across are extremely important too. Not to say that intentions aren't also important.
Pages: [1]
 

Page created in 0.119 seconds with 21 queries.