Awaclus because the plan he proposed for the mass claim seems like something he migjt try as scum then argue its all jist sound reasoning even though he knows it isn't.
What part about it is not sound reasoning?
I think you may know this is not actually sound reasoning:
But currently we've massclaimed a grand total of 0 times. Clearly at least our collective thinking is that it isn't a 50-50 shot, or we'd be doing it day 1 at least sometimes.
Yeah, but that's based on playing WIFOM against the mod, which I think is a bad idea.
One would simply need to look at a sample of past games of mafia played here to see that usually town has more to lose than gain by claiming D1, and that should set the odds of a D1 massclaim here at less than 50% chance of being good. Calling it playing 'wifom against the mod' to set the odds anywhere but 50-50 ignores all the previous evidence we have from previous games of mafia on this site. Add in the information we already know from the setup that scum get a chance to steal town PRs and may want to know all the town PRs in order to steal them, and the fact that we don't know for sure whether or not scum have really solid fake claims, and the odds should be lower than 50% that a D1 massclaim would be good for town.
So what I'm left with are a few possiblities:
1) You're scum, and you were hoping some/all town would claim their roles and give you an advantage.
2) You're town, and you see this logic differently for some reason.
3) You're scum, and you see this logic differently for some reason, so you expected town cred for proposing it.
I guess if you can explain why you see it differently, that would move you back from scummy into null for me.