@Delseban:
Don't say I was lying when I plausible explained that I didn't. That's a huge accusation.
As I said twice already, you could have noticed that I had no Potion in play.
I have no screen as proof, neither have you. I remember you said "sure" after I asked if it's ok for you to play another game. I didn't force you to play another game by immediately resigning, it was after we mutually agreed to do so. You didn't say "wait a moment" or anything. You had any chance to explain your thoughts, but you didn't.
That is the main point here. You say you didn't had the chance to think about it properly, I say you did and agreed. I say I waited and gave you every time to agree on playing again. There is no way to prove any of this two opposing claims. But there are signs on what may have happened:
See, even if I resigned early on, giving you no chance to check things like you claim, well, you know, you are still in the same screen after I resigned. There is the log available for you to check if everything went right.
Instead, you didn't, saying you had no chance to do so (which is definitely not true. There was every time to check the log!) AND you accepted my proposal of a new game. Nobody forced you to do this.
And of course I was sure I clicked to return the Alchemist. It just turned out that I wasn't clicking to return it, but to clean it up. That was no lie! I just didn't understand the interface there. Second false accusation here.
Forfeiting AFTER asking the opponent whether it is ok do so and play a new game is no illegitimate reason, either. I didn't hypnotize you. You had every chance to create your own opinion, to check the gamelog for the Potion, to not immediately accept the new game, and so on. You just didn't. And now you blame me that you didn't. It's not my task to think for you, every of your decision was yours.
The fact that you just bought a Possession is not making things better, but like I said, the game was nowhere over yet. Maybe 60-40 for you.
Man, you could have sent me a personal message before posting here, asking what's going on. We could have explained things and maybe find a solution. It's just bad to post here that you won here without doing so before, saying I was lying and letting me believe everything is alright.
Now we have a problem. That's a tournament for fun with nothing big to win, so no reason for both of us to cheat here. But still both of us think the other one acted horribly wrong, and like I tried to explain, both of us made mistakes and both are wrong a bit. That's not the intent of a tournament I participated in to have fun, which I already lost here. I could say now "hey, take your win, I've lost all the fun of playing already", but I won't do so, since it sounds like a confession of guilt.
I carefully avoided ad hominem arguments in my first post and you just go "def was lying here and there" without solid proof, based on assumptions that are wrong due to what I already explained in earlier posts. I won't accept that.
That's the one thing. The other thing is, what should happen with the tournament. What do you think, theory?