Joth part 2First, his response to my previous summary: “I don't believe I realized my Walrus vote was L-1 at the time I did it. But I know we were nearing the end of the day and I was concerned we wouldn't get consensus for a lynch. I don't dispute anything else in the summary. My reason not to lynch ash was because I wanted to see if scum would kill him for his claim. They didn't. So it no longer applies.”
re: pps 139 “the only person who's raised my scum flag is pps, but I remember from modding DS9 that pps tends to raise my scum flag day 1 even when I'm the mod and I know for sure he's not scum. So that's probably just a blindspot.” 141 it’s pps’s tone, like he is trying too hard. 356 “FoS: chairs and PPS. You don't push for a policy lynch when there are multiple lynches of substance on the table. You're either lazy town or scum if you do.”
357-363 small tiff with pps. DAY 2 766 pps was critical of Arch votes; agrees that scum!pps wouldn’t be so obvious in his defense of Arch. Top scum reads: ash, Walrus, pps. 767
unvotes mistaken xeiron vote, which unvoted Walrus. 777 “ if you re-read PPS's day 1 you'll see there's a significant case” 787 agrees with
faust’s case on pps.
v. pps. 806 pps’s claim makes him “a little less convinced he's the right lynch here.” 884 “Is PPS's claimed power too strong to be real?” 889 “pps-ashersky scum team elaborate web of lies?” 901 to pps: Meanwhile, you and ashersky together just happen to make a complicated Rube Goldberg machine that keeps our IC alive, so we'd better not lynch either of you. 988
v. pps “the evidence is mounting. and this is panicked scum posting.” 1013 “I have no confidence the vig shot will kill pps, so I'd rather lynch him.” 1050 “I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't feel safer with a perfect narrative for PPS. But LAL, man. Lynch All Liars.”
re: Walrus Day 2 from 769
827 xeiron’s sudgy plan “relies on trusting Walrus to clear his own name, which is never the best idea.” 829 Is there a sudgy/walrus paradox? 955 “Walrus is by far the scummiest claim on the table, as I have said over and over. He would be my pick for a lynch but I don't want to interfere with night action shenanigans.”
re: Archetype 213 challenges faust’s Arch vote. 233 Arch wagon not that scummy. Asks IC for guidance. 459 nkirbit his biggest scum read; doesn’t like Walrus’s claim at all; would switch to Archetype, but doesn’t like Walrus claim. FTR, more null on Archetype, but prefer over no lynch. (this is before yuma brought up no lynch at 491) 496 “What is the case against Arch?” 525 nkirbit’s case is about things that happened after the wagon had started. 533 I really really wish my choice was not between Archetype and no lynch. 535 notes time,
v. Archetype {L-1} 546 “At least no one can say that lynch was too easy.” DAY 2 766 2.7 called Arch obvtown; ashersky and nkirbit were the first to vote sudgy after his claim; pps was critical of Arch votes; Admits he was convinced Arch was town, or at least not scum. 774 “I L-1'd Archetype 20 minutes before deadline. Does that make any sense if I'm scum?” nkirbit town read b/c of Archtype wagon; wants to lynch ash, Walrus, yuma, pps. 841 “I know I'm biased, but it's hard for me to see my Archetype vote as a bus.”
re: no lynch459 FTR, more null on Archetype, but prefer over no lynch. 525 against no lynch, worried about deadline. 532 no lynch is bad b/c lynching is the town’s weapon, and scum will certainly use theirs. 841 if he were scum he wouldn’t have fought so hard against no lynch.
re: yuma550
after Arch’s lynch “Wow yuma is scummy right now” re: sheeping pr’s and role claim idea. 554 yuma is trying to direct pr’s. 561 yuma is scummy for downplaying the use of deduction, the mass claim idea, and instructing pr’s. DAY 2 647 to yuma re: no lynch “Because Walrus and Archetype were BOTH your partners! You had no other choice. THat's rich!” 650 yuma didn’t have time to form a case on xeiron. 652 to yuma: “I’m not going to argue with scum!” 656 yuma wants to know if Joth has a result on him, joth says he is trying to out a pr. 659 snarky to yuma. 667 thinks yuma is scum from the narrative, doesn’t have extra information. Galz lurked and maybe outed b/c he was scum. 686 yuma was stalling out with no lynch. 691 apologizes for earlier comments about Galz. 879 Doesn’t want to lynch yuma unless Walrus is scum, since his theory rests on Walrus being scum.
v. ashersky 882 to faust: “How sure are you that yuma is scum? If Walrus is town, yuma's D1 play is very very strange for scum, coming in and advocating no lynch like that.”
re: sudgy claim296 “why would sudgy fakeclaim now?” Baffled. 298 sudgy would be dumb scum to claim now, cop could check it out, he wouldn’t get away with it. 335 chides faust for mentioning doctoring sudgy.
re: his claim646 has things to share 648 no useful information after all after rereading. 792 “I claim at your bidding, IC.” 798 “Ok, I am seeing the potential confusion here and I'm thinking maybe I'd better claim. pps, you watched sudgy, yes? And you saw that I targeted him? is that where we are?” 799 You don't have to answer that actually. I targeted sudgy with an investigative power. Did not learn anything that wasn't revealed in the flip. But I hadn't considered that someone might be watching me. My rationale was that it would be useful if sudgy DID survive the night. 801 faust asks question. “Well, at that point I'm full claiming. SHould I just full claim? I AM at L-2.”
806 claims “[other irrelevant modifier] modifier cop”. 819 I ask if claiming was necessary. “oh probably not. But as soon as I realized that someone could have seen me target sudgy, I thought I should get ahead of the accusation with the truth. I had been teetering on the edge of claiming for a while.” 822 can only use power on non-consecutive nights. 825 Agrees it’s a weak power, “at least the town won't be too screwed if you mislynch me”. Asks us to look at his reads if he is lynched. 841 As for admitting to targeting sudgy ... that's what I did. Would not admitting it have been less scummy? 865 “if you're willing to keep me alive until night 3 I can totally prove my identity by modifier copping someone.” 910 offers to flavor claim