iguana/Space/Swan/GalzSwan (4/8) => #1 => Poisoner
Space (16) => #3 => Watcher
Galz (42) => #4 => "Poisoner (fail)"
iguana (23) => #10 => The Barracks (fail)
Makes sense as far as the bids are concerned, scum might even assume that "scum wouldn't do ALL Lost numbers" could go in their favor in the end. Galz is obviously some PR here... it's a little weird to kill Eevee is Galz is a roleblocker, but the non-Roleblocker situations are also slightly weird for N1, so I don't know. Rolecop is possible, given scum's accuracy at hitting PRs after N1 (Arch/chairs especially, perfect timing there).
DAY 1
The Poisoner thing... at the risk of annoying Galz to death, here's how it goes
Galz says people in support of vigs (which he supposed to be a majority) should not be opposed to Poisoner shooting N1 (ignoring the fact that Poisoners are decidedly not vigs, among other things).
But then he hurriedly adds that he, personally, is not in favor of a poisoner shootings.
The question then is: why bring this up ? What does this add, what does this do for Galz's wincon ? If he's town, I guess he can gauge reactions to it ? Reactions to theory talk are generally not worthy of much, but you know.
If he's scum, why do this ? Well, scum, I think, did not intend to have iguana claim on D1. They had thought about how bad it would look in a massclaim and assigned their Goon to the role of Poisoner fakeclaim, but I don't think they intended to claim on D1... because there's no upside from them. The result of this was an automatic scum lynch on D3. Granted, a non-Poisoner lynch, but still.
The direct result of Galz's actions is what ? Muddying the waters on the consensus that a town poisoner would not shoot. At least one guy is... well Galz will insist he was not against it, which he does say - repeatedly, but raising the question (which literally no one, no one else did in the entire game despite Galz's insistence that poisoner shooting should be a majority opinion since people like vigs). Which, for someone who's very much against something, he sure obsesses over making sure people know it's a valid opinion to be for it. It's very possible that scum!Galz genuinely thought he could save iguana from a lynch D3 with this argument, and realized by everyone's reaction on D2 that this was not going to be the case.
It's also very possible that this is just very bad play from town!Galz, and I have to get past it. But it annoys me tremendously, and Galz is not faust. He never did anything as nonsensical (for town) as this in M105. Because again, as town, why bring it up again on D2 ? What's the upside ? How does it help your wincon ?
Getting that out of the way...
#411: Galz criticizing a Swan vote by RR, and later - Chainsaw Defense - votes RR for it. In this scenario, Swan is the only scum who had a remote chance of ever getting lynched D1 (he had two votes at this point).
#465: Galz mentions looking at 105 to look at RR's response to being lynched here. Townie, I think scum might refer to that game but they surely don't actually go look at it (granted RR is a short reread and scum is SK!hunting but still), and probably don't bother lying about it.
#477: Swan using RR's responses to Galz as an argument for scum!RR. I think, when you have a very argumentative scumbuddy (who's good at it I mean), it's always tempting for their partners to do this.
In the "Galz annoys me" department, he insists that the case on gkrieg was about exclamation points, which was simply false. Null though.
#547: Space thinks Galz is townie, which is quite something given the very few reads Space gave out this game.
#569: Space is back to null on Galz. That's more like it.
#578: Galz essentially saying "go ahead and lynch LL, it's a good case, but I'd rather not be on wagon because I want to look good post-flip". I'm barely paraphrasing here.
DAY 2
So, the LL bid thing (this starts in day 1 but whatever).
Galz is at #4 with a bid of 42, LL claims to be a #6 with a bid of 16. Scum!Galz knows this is false because of Space, but what about town!Galz ? In order for it to be true, there would need to be a maximum of 5 unique numbers total and 16 would be the lowest double-number. Something like
1. 4
2. 8
3. 15
4. 42
5. some non-Lost number
6. 16
7. 16
Is that really that unlikely ? I mean, the only Lost number that garnered multiple bids in reality in 23, and one of them didn't get any bid at all. I don't know. I can see how that looks unlikely to Galz, but is it really worth saying ? I thought for sure it was outing Galz as a town!PR at the time, which... I guess if we believe the "bid for Poisoner at #4", then sure, but the more I think about it the less that makes sense to me.
Galz, if there's anything you want to respond to, it's that: your bid for Poisoner at #4. At that slot, you know there's at least one scum ahead of you, and you know they're going for Poisoner, no ? You can also answer why LL's 16 bid semeed so suspicious to you. I mean you answer what you want, but those are the ones that actually interest me.
Much like Swan, Galz is on a bit of a "How is LL alive ?" line. Noteworthy that faust (correctly) calls that nonsense. Noteworthy because of Swan, not because I happen to think it's a horrible argument. Galz says it's a small part of the case against LL, but it looks like it's about half of it (the other half being the lie/mistake about the bid).
You know, as much as LL did flip scum, I still dislike everything about that lynch. But, well, he was scum, so I guess I can't say anything about it.
#1022 is a puzzling one. I vote Glaz, he asks me if I think he killed WW. What ?
Galz, what was that about ?#1035 Swan kinda siding with me in the Poisoner thing.
This whole thing does raise the question of why I'm alive if Galz is scum. I mean, I'm very capable of changing my mind drastically as the game goes on, but I don't rememebr how much I did that in M105, so I don't know if Galz is aware of that.
The Candidate claim. Null as hell, as Galz clearly does this as town and thus wants to imitate it as scum. Also there's actually very little risk of death: either LL is the SK and gets lynched, or he's a town JK and very likely to JK Galz as a result, which is also nice for scum because now they know where the JK is most likely going, and it's not on the Poisoner or the killer.
Robz, if a scum ROleblocker gets Jailkept, does their Roleblock still goes through ?YOU KEEP SAING WE SHOULDN'T TELL IGUANA NOT TO SHOOT.
Yes ? This is true right ?
If the option is "iguana doesn't shoot period" or "iguana does whatever", arguing for the latter means you're open to the possibility of town!iguana shooting. I'm saying you shouldn't. Stop trying to make me pass for a dumb five-year old, thank you very much.
Yes, I'm open to the possibility. That's the point. You're not, and that's ridiculously scummy. I don't think he SHOULD, but I, nor you, nor anybody else can tell him what to do with his power. And if he DOES chose to shoot, I'm not going to rush off and lynch him.
Just putting this out there: re the Poisoner thing. At this point it's a bit of a desperate cause, so maybe scum!Galz would just give up, but that sure is a good viewpoint for sucm to hold. At this point, iguana hadn't said whether or not he poisoned N1. What if he did ? Really it surprises me he didn't: yeah it looks terrible because the guy he poisoned turned out to be an IC, but why not say it and have a very small chance at survival the next day ? Maybe because it got Galz off this argument where he looks absolutely terrible (since now LAL applies and it's all a moot point), in my totally unbiased opinion.
Galz agrees with the quicklynch, which I do think scum would agree with. Since the PoTi was town, it did turn out to be advantageous to scum, sorry about that. I don't think agreeing with it is scummy, but disagreeing would have been somewhat townie.
Now D4. I'll post this so Galz can respond to stuff if he wants, and say right now that, though I do stand by my statement somewhere in D4 that Galz was by far the scummiest player in the game, the first 3 days combined weigh less than D4 alone, so we'll see how that looks.