I'm going to go ahead and
Vote: EFHW D1, early on, EFHW was pretty unremarkable. Voted X for his random vote on Nkirbit, talked about theory, but nothing that really struck me as either towny or scummy. She has mail-mi as her top town read, solely for lurking.
The first thing that stuck out at me is that after delaying, she jumped ahead and voted me for my case, without really understanding what my case was. The final thing that tipped the balance for her was that I said "I think the fact you're attempting to discredit my case rather than defend yourself speaks volumes, as well." Now, I can get someone disagreeing with this, but using that sentence as justification to vote me? It wasn't really out of line with anything I had been saying, and I had been pushing nkirbit HARD, but it seemed like a flimsy reason, as if she was trying to find a reason to join in on my wagon and get the lynch going.
Yet, despite voting me, she says in #458:
Now, this does not mean I find TA the scummiest, and I am not going to argue for a TA lynch today.
She states that she finds Sudgy and Xeiron scummier than she finds me.
Despite finding Sudgy scummy, she never gets around to placing her vote on him.
Once it's clear post-claim Sudgy will not get lynched, there's a point where Xeiron only has 2 votes, yet she hesitates to place her vote on him. However, in #768, after being prompted to vote again, she returns to place her vote on TA, not Xeiron, who she stated she had found scummier. She also avoided voting Xeiron until the hammer.
Finally, after Xeiron and Lio's claim, she pushes them hard, pointing out the contradictions in their case. Yet she is still hesitant to lynch. She makes sure that she has both mine and nkirbit's backing for a hammer, before she goes through. The fact that she was so hesitant, in the face of the obvious contradictions/lies of Xeiron/Lio, read scummy rather than towny to me. Towny, looking at those lies, would have thought that we definitely had caught scum (it's what I thought).
Today, she has a case on mail-mi. The case occurred after Raerae had opened the day voting Mail-mi for lurking. The case even names mail-mi - sudgy as a scum team, solely on the basis of mail-mi saying he thinks Sudgy is town. This case is extremely flimsy to me -- mail-mi's lurking, yes, and it's fine to vote to apply pressure, as Raerae did, but to build a case entirely based on lurking, especially when we know he's been V/LA? It just seems too easy and convenient to me, and I'm not buying it.
I also find it suspicious that I was a scum read to her yesterday, and she voted for me twice, yet she jumped back on mail-mi rather than on me. My suspicion is that this is because I haven't really been under any pressure today, and my lynch would probably be one of the harder ones to push. So she wants to go for mail-mi, who would be an easier mislynch today.
Case in short: EFHW found an arbitrary reason to vote TA after many others already had, didn't vote Sudgy despite a scum-read, made sure she only voted Xeiron after she had permission from TA and nkirbit, despite having brought up an obvious lie herself, and brought up a flimsy case on mail-mi today based solely on lurking, despite the fact that I was a larger scum read to her yesterday than mail-mi was.