I'm crazy confused someone pls explain what the deal with Yuma is and galz why do we want to lynch ash, just so we can have robz flip?
Yes.
Look, from WW perspective: If CT's believe without question that the MH are town, then we're at a 5v5 stalemate. If we go to night on a no-lynch, then come tomorrow, MH can overpower WW's with CT help. By lynching you then, MH guarantee themselves a win, even without the help of CT. So it's in WW best interest to prove to CT that MH are not, indeed, on their side. Because if we no-lynch now, MH win. They win over WW's, and they win over CT.
Now, I understand that CT know I'm WW, and that makes me admitted scum. But here's the thing. If we lynch Ash, and he VK's Robz, then it's an even trade. 1 for 1. If CT are telling the truth, that makes the teams 4v4, AND they still get a NK to make it 4v3 in their favor. EVEN if WW's have a NK as well, that puts us to a 3v3 stalemate - same situation we're in now. EXCEPT, I'll be dead. And that means no Doctor for Morgrim. This means in a 3v3 no-lynch, they can NK Morgrim, taking out 2 WW's, while the most town that WW's could kill is 1. That means the final day comes out 2 Town, 1 WW - and town win.
All I'm asking by pushing this strategy is that the CT's don't completely screw themselves over. By believing MH now, CT are handing them the game if they are scum (they are). By lynching Ash (a WW), CT can at least SEE that they aren't being fooled when Robz gets Vengekilled. At that point, the teams will be 3 WW (Ash dies, MH nightkill me) vs 2 (1 if WW have a NK) MH vs 2 CT.
3v2v2, or 3v1v2. If MH are town like they claim, CT/MH go on to win together. If they AREN'T town, CT have at least given themselves a chance to win.