Tables is the only one that's really read to me as being significantly suspicious of both. Though I think all have said they'd be willing to lynch jo if they thought getting scum was unlikely.
I have certainly been significantly suspicious of both. I'm much less suspicious of Joth right now, and Axxle I'm kinda 40/60 on mafia/town, which is probably good enough. But the second point... what? No, I've never said anything like that, I don't think anyone's said anything REALLY like that in a serious way.
Unfortunately, I don't have an awful lot to add regarding Axxle. His claim is unsurprising, and kinda believable actually. He's playing pretty reasonably for how I'd expect VT to play. OTOH, he's also playing pretty reasonably for a mafioso pretending to be VT. There's also a WIFOM argument in there (Wine in Front of Me, look it up if you're unfamilar and interested) where him knowing a PR claim would be less likely to get him lynched, so not claiming one makes his claim more likely true. Ah, but he'd know that, so he could be mafia double bluffing. In which case a VT claim is bad for mafia, so mafia would claim a PR knowing a PR claim would be less likely to get him lynched (and repeat ad infinatum).
I have two things I want to add before the day ends.
1) Post 766 by Robz, where he more or less agreed with my list. He added some original analysis, but I got a distinct flavour of Robz trying to buddy up to me, which unnerved me a little. Not sure exactly what to think, but I wanted to record it.
2) O I've found fairly annoying recently, in a kind of passive, unfun to read his posts kind of way. I think I'll have to give it another look during the night to see if it's indicating something sinister, or just O being annoying. But generally combined with his unhelpful earlygame behaviour, I have my eye on him, in short.