Sorry for spamming the threads. I wanted to have access to those posts when I am on my phone.
In saying my defending of joth was super scummy, you keep equating my defending his statements being misrepresented by ash (which they were) as my defending him from being exiled (which I did not). Of course, I also did not vote for him, but that's just because there was a better place for my vote. (a) trusting gloobie's read over my non read, and b) thinking you are on the scum team).
I have given a few examples of things you've done that I thought were scummy. (granted the scumslip may have just been me seeing something that wasn't there and confirmation bias). But can you give specific examples of what you find scummy that I did or said?
You're right (I needed to reread) that you were not defending Joth. I did misrepresent that opinion, and I apologize. Instead, you were just working against his exile. Ash explains it better than I do in that first post I reposted. But perhaps more importantly is what I said a few posts before that... we almost didn't get the Joth exile off. In order for it to happen town really needed to fall in on the vote. To be absent in the time before the deadline and leaving you vote to do help us not at all (from my perspective) is scummy. Galzack is scummy for this reason, too. 4 to exile out of what was effectively 6 people is rough, especially if we suppose there are two scum.
So, its not so much that you are saying scummy stuff, its that I think that if there are 2 scum in our TL, it has to be you or Galzack. And you were trying harder to get us not to exile than anyone else other than Glooble.
You're ongoing suspicion of me is trickier. This is a game where some people have been tenacious in their wrongness, so you might just be following along. I correctly read Eddie, and he correctly read me. I think I have played in every mafia game that he has played since we both came to f.ds except one, and that was the one my husband played in (we don't play well together). I think that we read each other pretty well. Instead of taking his green flip and looking back and re-evaluating what he said now knowing with full certainty that he was town, you are plowing along in your anti-didds campaign based on, well, I am not sure what.
You have not responded to the PoE arguments, nor explained why I (or anyone) would ever, ever hammer my partner when he could have just stayed alive and then we could plabe the no-exile on Glaz. I wasn't under pressure AT ALL. I hammered him because he was scum and I am town.
Finally, there is the "scumslip" that you have accused me of. It wasn't a slip of any kind. MiX has expressed his opinion, and I continue to stand by what I said exactly the way that I said it. You have said that it could have been in your head. But still you are using that sense to inform your gameplay. Its like you keep getting information that you have been wrong or misled, but you aren't changing anything in light of that information...just digging in stubbornly.
You tell me what you have done that has helped town. Or why Glazack is better exile. Or anything really that can get the conversation moving forward.