EFHW
vote: joth. No lynch seems bad for town and his reasons were strange.
Fine and null early vote.
And actually, this brings up a good point on the whole claiming house idea. It would be beneficial for anyone to be the last person standing in their house, as they could recharge spheres freely without risk of theft (barring secondary, role-related methods of theft). So as soon as that knowledge is out there, it could affect how people vote (and how scum kills). So we should not claim to get true reads and opinions out before anyone can start trying to use that knowledge strategically.
ppe several
On the other hand, this is a townslip.
Vote: cayvie
Townslip? It's pretty scummy to be planning to kill players because they are in your house regardless of alignment.
Are you saying that Dylan is scummy for this, or just that it's not a Townslip?
vote: hypercube
Was this just for agreeing with faust's Dustbringer plan?
Have we heard from Eddie about Dylan's report on their QT? I'd like to hear what he has to say about it.
I'm very confused about Dylan saying he didn't full claim to Eddie. What is left to claim? Was there more Eddie wanted included?
I'm still trying to understand the whole Eddie thing. Did either one of them say that Dylan part-claimed? Did Dylan house-claim at some point? I don't think Dylan saying he didn't full-claim implies that he part-claimed; I take it to mean that he didn't claim. My understanding is that full-claiming to Eddie is in official action one must choose to take, whether or not Eddie already knows the details of that player's claim?
No about dibbs.
It’s so clear that the extra power belongs to the order that calling house + order a fullclaim is totally NAI.
Scumslip here? Or 3rd party slip? Knowing someone's order does not tell you the special power that goes with it.
Regarding this and Didds' post, is the suggestion that House and Order is not a full-claim unless it also includes what that Order's unique power is, or that because some player/s claim to have one or more extra abilities as Town therefore all Town must? I'm not sure the first is much more than semantics, and the second seems to be a huge assumption and requires something close to a massclaim to verify. I guess the second is moot now since the IC has provided a counter-example.
Why wouldn't a town!neighbor tell us the whole story of what Eddie wanted?
What are you trying to gain from this? Surely if Town neighbours are keeping quiet it's because they have a reason to. Do you think any scum among them would be caught out if they had to open up about it (genuine question)? I doubt that any scum not aligned with Eddie (whether or not he's 3rd party) have given anything away to him they didn't want to.
vote: MiX.
Ppe: Still want to vote MiX.
Why? For disagreeing that Rhand scumslipped? For not revealing more about the Eddie business?
vote: Didds. Possible third party slip and over-emphasis on being pro-town. Why should Eddie be pro-town if he is a third party? We haven't heard any confirmation that he changed alignment.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, the Didds scumslip was disproved by Glooble (
#835). Did you miss that or was the scumslip about something else?
With the pro-Town thing, are you talking about
#954? Is there a reason why it's scummy, or is this just a vote to express your disagreement? Why in particular would scum complain about a 3rd party not being pro-Town?
So... some scummy things here. Scumpoints for votes on hypercube and MiX without explanation. More for seemingly being fixed on scumslips and in particular 3rd party slips (with Eddie already being 3rd party, both Didds and Rhand have been accused of 3rd party slipping - that's a lot of parties!), and for using it as a reason to vote for Didds even after it was disproved by the IC. Overall I'm inclined to put her down as mild-moderate scum.