Vote: gkrieg
Here's why.
I think both DatSwan and Hydrad are more likely town than scum. As in, I am townreading them right now based on my read of their play. Also, I think DatSwan's case has some merit, even though he didn't go into a lot of detail about it. Gkrieg's voting positions yesterday have feasible scum motivations.
But really, this is why I started to scumread gkrieg more and more.
If DatSwan is town, and Hydrad is town, and gkrieg is also town, then probably someone on a 4-person scum team would join the wagon and vote for gkrieg also to try to get the wagon going and get a mislynch.
However, if DatSwan is town, and Hydrad is town, and gkrieg is scum, I would expect it to go exactly as it did, with no one joining them and hoping that the wagon would dissipate. Now traction is all sort of moving to Awaclus/McMcsalot.
Scum are 4/12 players right now. The last time we had 4 scum with this few players, I was scum and we made the mistake of bussing and the whole game got impossible. Scum doesn't want to bus here, they want to mislynch a few times and win through sheer force of numbers.
TLDR: gkrieg is scummy, and we should lynch him, and it has more to do with Hydrad/DatSwan being towny than anything. Let's discuss this and not lynch McMc.
@Hydrad, you should switch back, you had it right the first time, we can sort McMc later.
I don't think speculation on other people being townie is a good case on anyone. You don't know their alignments (assuming you're town). Based on pretty much the same logic, Mcmcsalot is scum because his wagon lost steam yesterday (and I could use the same logic that you/Awaclus/Galzria were pretty townie yesterday). Also my voting pattern is only scummy if Mcmcsalot is scum, whose wagon you are actively pushing against.
You can make inferences on peoples' alignment based on their wagons later in the game, but doing it with 12 left alive is much too early.
The thing that really gets me is how hard you start to push the wagon after you say that your case is based more on two players being townie than anything.
I think it's better than your case on McMc!
I'm not decided on McMc, but I can see where he is coming from as town, given that he just moved across the country and he's been very busy but still wanted to play a game. His D1 did look scummy to me in a vacuum, but I could also see him as town feeling like he should participate but not really having time to sit down and properly analyse the game, and therefore just going with gut reads with no explanations and other super quick stuff like that as he read along.
Then D2 after getting some heat he did his best to put up some analysis to prove he can. So yeah, I can see that coming from him as town, but he could also be scum. I'm not decided on him yet. But this weak movement toward him now when the deadline is approaching makes me actually think more towny about him. So yeah, worth defending, and hopefully it doesn't bite me later.
As for you, I guess I should say that my read on DatSwan and Hydrad is pretty strong. Especially Hydrad, I would bet the game on him being town this time. DatSwan has not been AS towny today but I saw a lot of towny content from him yesterday and so he is still one of my strongest townreads.
And I don't have strong scum reads at all. But I know if I am right about DatSwan/Hydrad that you basically should be scum. So yeah, I feel good about the case. I think other people should check it out and maybe do rereads of Hydrad/DatSwan to see where I am coming from with them being towny and you being scummy by PoE.
One more thing, I do think your voting is kinda scummy yesterday even if McMc is town. If McMc is scum and you are scum, that would mean you voted a partner while making sure that a town got lynched instead. If McMc is town though, that means you eagerly voted towns all day, ensuring that both major wagons were on town by the EoD. It's certainly possible for a town to do what you did but the scum motivation is there too and that puts you under suspicion.
If you want me to vote somewhere else, then I guess I need stronger evidence than what I'm seeing to change my mind.