Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 13 [All]

Author Topic: Empires Rulebook  (Read 38538 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mic Qsenoch

  • 2015 DS Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1650
  • Respect: +4170
    • View Profile
Empires Rulebook
« on: June 06, 2016, 06:22:49 pm »
+32

Logged

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2016, 06:29:21 pm »
0

Hell yeah!
Logged

enfynet

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1682
  • Respect: +1145
    • View Profile
    • JD's Custom Clubs
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2016, 06:30:43 pm »
0

Hooray!
Logged
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious."

Marcory

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 634
  • Respect: +1026
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2016, 06:34:10 pm »
+1

Donate. Wow.
Logged

pacovf

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3297
  • Multiediting poster
  • Respect: +3638
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2016, 06:34:25 pm »
+3

Donate. Wow.

Ninja'd by seconds. OMGWTFBBQ
Logged
pacovf has a neopets account.  It has 999 hours logged.  All his neopets are named "Jessica".  I guess that must be his ex.

Cuzz

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 493
  • Shuffle iT Username: Cuzz
  • Respect: +794
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2016, 06:34:51 pm »
0

!!!!!
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2016, 06:35:47 pm »
0

Logged

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2016, 06:37:49 pm »
0

So, is anyone up for a first impressions stream? The ones that usually do it are testers who are not allowed to.
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2016, 06:39:04 pm »
+1

Tax is cool.
Logged

markusin

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3596
  • Shuffle iT Username: markusin
  • I also switched from Starcraft
  • Respect: +2170
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2016, 06:41:40 pm »
0

So, is anyone up for a first impressions stream? The ones that usually do it are testers who are not allowed to.

That actually sounds like fun. I might be up for it tonight. I'd review them blind.
Logged

jsh357

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2553
  • Shuffle iT Username: jsh357
  • Respect: +4269
    • View Profile
    • JSH Gaming: Original games
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2016, 06:42:32 pm »
+3

So, is anyone up for a first impressions stream? The ones that usually do it are testers who are not allowed to.

That actually sounds like fun. I might be up for it tonight. I'd review them blind.

Please, lots of people do this! I'm a glutton! A glutton for opinions! Help!
Logged
Join the Dominion community Discord channel! Chat in text and voice; enter dumb tournaments; spy on top players!

https://discord.gg/2rDpJ4N

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2016, 06:48:19 pm »
0

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2016, 06:50:24 pm »
0

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.

Wanna do one together? Having a conversation about the cards sounds fun to me.
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

pacovf

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3297
  • Multiediting poster
  • Respect: +3638
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2016, 06:50:33 pm »
0

I don't have specific opinions, but look interesting (aside from previews):

Archive
Charm
Encampment
Overlord
Annex
Delve
D0N4T3!!!!11!!1!!111!11
Salt the Earth
Orchard
Tower
Logged
pacovf has a neopets account.  It has 999 hours logged.  All his neopets are named "Jessica".  I guess that must be his ex.

enfynet

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1682
  • Respect: +1145
    • View Profile
    • JD's Custom Clubs
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2016, 06:56:29 pm »
+3

I have a lot of thoughts, and I'm only halfway through the Kingdom cards. I'm gonna use Overlord on Band of Misfits.
Logged
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious."

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #15 on: June 06, 2016, 06:56:41 pm »
+9

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.

Wanna do one together? Having a conversation about the cards sounds fun to me.

Count me in!  Furiously wiki-ing at the moment.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

wachsmuth

  • Apprentice
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 266
  • Respect: +342
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2016, 06:57:18 pm »
0

I would also be up for doing a first impressions stream. Someone can PM me now if they wanna do one with 2 commentators :)
Logged

jsh357

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2553
  • Shuffle iT Username: jsh357
  • Respect: +4269
    • View Profile
    • JSH Gaming: Original games
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #17 on: June 06, 2016, 07:00:19 pm »
0

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.

Wanna do one together? Having a conversation about the cards sounds fun to me.

Count me in!  Furiously wiki-ing at the moment.

While you're at that, can you add the subreddit to the front page of the wiki with the other community links? I tried to do it the other day and couldn't figure out how.
Logged
Join the Dominion community Discord channel! Chat in text and voice; enter dumb tournaments; spy on top players!

https://discord.gg/2rDpJ4N

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2016, 07:03:10 pm »
0

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.

Wanna do one together? Having a conversation about the cards sounds fun to me.

Count me in!  Furiously wiki-ing at the moment.

While you're at that, can you add the subreddit to the front page of the wiki with the other community links? I tried to do it the other day and couldn't figure out how.

Sure thing.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #19 on: June 06, 2016, 07:19:25 pm »
0

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.

Wanna do one together? Having a conversation about the cards sounds fun to me.

Count me in!  Furiously wiki-ing at the moment.

I've got a league match at ~9 EDT but otherwise I'm free from 8 PM EDT until whenever. If scheduling doesn't work / you guys wanna do this during my match no big deal; otherwise I'd love to try this.
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #20 on: June 06, 2016, 07:25:19 pm »
0

I'd be down for helping with a first impressions stream, if anyone cares what I think about anything.

Wanna do one together? Having a conversation about the cards sounds fun to me.

Count me in!  Furiously wiki-ing at the moment.

I've got a league match at ~9 EDT but otherwise I'm free from 8 PM EDT until whenever. If scheduling doesn't work / you guys wanna do this during my match no big deal; otherwise I'd love to try this.

8 should work.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2016, 07:40:42 pm »
0

Having Donate and Tomb in the same game would completely mess with the end game.
Logged

markusin

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3596
  • Shuffle iT Username: markusin
  • I also switched from Starcraft
  • Respect: +2170
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #22 on: June 06, 2016, 07:52:17 pm »
0

So, is anyone up for a first impressions stream? The ones that usually do it are testers who are not allowed to.

That actually sounds like fun. I might be up for it tonight. I'd review them blind.

Well I've managed to get snippets of all the cards in the rulebook and sorted them in an appropriate order, all without looking at what the cards actually do. I'd like to open up a stream to review them in an hour on my Twitch channel, but I'd be down to instead commentate alongside someone who knows how to sync multiple commentators on a stream. I have no idea how to do that.

My Twitch Channel:
https://www.twitch.tv/markusincos

Edit: Going live now.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2016, 08:49:23 pm by markusin »
Logged

dmet

  • Herbalist
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: +32
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #23 on: June 06, 2016, 08:06:20 pm »
0

Having Donate and Tomb in the same game would completely mess with the end game.

I know we avoid 3-card combos, but Donate, Tomb and anything that gains a lot of bad cards quickly (Beggar and Treasure Hunter come to mind) could be super cool. Beggar especially would help you pay off the debt on the turn you buy Donate.
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2688
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2867
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #24 on: June 06, 2016, 08:31:26 pm »
+7

I think SCSN has a new favorite event in Delve.
Logged

RevanFan

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2016, 08:43:51 pm »
+4

I thought of a beautiful thing while reading the rulebook. It'll be difficult to pull off, but it would be great if it works.

First turn, buy Donate. Take the 8 debt, and trash everything except for 5 copper. Pay off the debt, but don't buy any cards when the debt is payed off. It'll take 2 turns to pay off the debt, leaving you with 2 coin left. DON'T SPEND IT. On the third turn after buying Donate, use your 5 copper to buy Windfall. Gain the 3 golds. Turn after that, Donate again to trash the rest of your copper. Pay off the debt that turn as well, if you can. Then feel free to Windfall to your heart's desire, or just buy all the Provinces.

I don't know how I thought of that, but I'm glad I did.
Logged

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2016, 08:50:28 pm »
+1

Donate is beyond busted. Probably stronger than Chapel and kills Mountebank and Cultist. Holy amazeballs. So many cards. Hard to process everything at once.
Logged

trivialknot

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 565
  • Respect: +904
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #27 on: June 06, 2016, 09:09:20 pm »
+1

OMG

Obelisk/Scout is the Scout combo we've all been waiting for!

Tax is the comeuppance that the first player has long been asking for!

Donate is an alternative to conceding!
Logged

ephesos

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 310
  • Shuffle iT Username: Ephesos
  • Respect: +262
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #28 on: June 06, 2016, 10:31:48 pm »
+2

Don't forget the Band of Misfits reprint that you can open with... maybe now we can finally empty the supply solo on turn 2.

Also, Banquet + IGG just seems terrifying; I guess you can open with another 5 to counter, but if you're second player, you can have 2 curses in your deck before your first shuffle.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2016, 10:34:36 pm by ephesos »
Logged

ephesos

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 310
  • Shuffle iT Username: Ephesos
  • Respect: +262
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #29 on: June 06, 2016, 10:46:33 pm »
+1

I thought of a beautiful thing while reading the rulebook. It'll be difficult to pull off, but it would be great if it works.

First turn, buy Donate. Take the 8 debt, and trash everything except for 5 copper. Pay off the debt, but don't buy any cards when the debt is payed off. It'll take 2 turns to pay off the debt, leaving you with 2 coin left. DON'T SPEND IT. On the third turn after buying Donate, use your 5 copper to buy Windfall. Gain the 3 golds. Turn after that, Donate again to trash the rest of your copper. Pay off the debt that turn as well, if you can. Then feel free to Windfall to your heart's desire, or just buy all the Provinces.

I don't know how I thought of that, but I'm glad I did.

I'm not 100% sure on how Debt works, being that I've never played with it, but don't you have some money after you buy Donate, that you can pay off with?

So after you buy it, you spend whatever money you started with to remove some of the Debt, giving you good odds to pay the rest of it off on turn 2 with your 5 copper and Windfall turn 3.

And on turn 4 you Donate, then Windfall turn 5, and just buy Provinces turns 6-9 with decent likelihood to not draw all 3 Provinces for the last buy.
Logged

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7044
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9264
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #30 on: June 06, 2016, 10:55:03 pm »
0

I thought of a beautiful thing while reading the rulebook. It'll be difficult to pull off, but it would be great if it works.

First turn, buy Donate. Take the 8 debt, and trash everything except for 5 copper. Pay off the debt, but don't buy any cards when the debt is payed off. It'll take 2 turns to pay off the debt, leaving you with 2 coin left. DON'T SPEND IT. On the third turn after buying Donate, use your 5 copper to buy Windfall. Gain the 3 golds. Turn after that, Donate again to trash the rest of your copper. Pay off the debt that turn as well, if you can. Then feel free to Windfall to your heart's desire, or just buy all the Provinces.

I don't know how I thought of that, but I'm glad I did.

I'm not 100% sure on how Debt works, being that I've never played with it, but don't you have some money after you buy Donate, that you can pay off with?

So after you buy it, you spend whatever money you started with to remove some of the Debt, giving you good odds to pay the rest of it off on turn 2 with your 5 copper and Windfall turn 3.

And on turn 4 you Donate, then Windfall turn 5, and just buy Provinces turns 6-9 with decent likelihood to not draw all 3 Provinces for the last buy.

Donate happens after your turn ends, at which point you have no money.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Mic Qsenoch

  • 2015 DS Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1650
  • Respect: +4170
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #31 on: June 06, 2016, 10:58:48 pm »
+5

I thought of a beautiful thing while reading the rulebook. It'll be difficult to pull off, but it would be great if it works.

First turn, buy Donate. Take the 8 debt, and trash everything except for 5 copper. Pay off the debt, but don't buy any cards when the debt is payed off. It'll take 2 turns to pay off the debt, leaving you with 2 coin left. DON'T SPEND IT. On the third turn after buying Donate, use your 5 copper to buy Windfall. Gain the 3 golds. Turn after that, Donate again to trash the rest of your copper. Pay off the debt that turn as well, if you can. Then feel free to Windfall to your heart's desire, or just buy all the Provinces.

I don't know how I thought of that, but I'm glad I did.

I'm not 100% sure on how Debt works, being that I've never played with it, but don't you have some money after you buy Donate, that you can pay off with?

So after you buy it, you spend whatever money you started with to remove some of the Debt, giving you good odds to pay the rest of it off on turn 2 with your 5 copper and Windfall turn 3.

And on turn 4 you Donate, then Windfall turn 5, and just buy Provinces turns 6-9 with decent likelihood to not draw all 3 Provinces for the last buy.

Donate happens after your turn ends, at which point you have no money.

That doesn't matter, when you buy Donate and get the debt you certainly may have generated some money and can use it to pay off the debt, ephesos is right.
Logged

Elanchana

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 697
  • Princess of Derpminion
  • Respect: +1005
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #32 on: June 06, 2016, 11:04:39 pm »
+1

fhhh.

I think DXV has lost it. I was reading through the card descriptions and I had to stop partway through the Landmarks because my brain couldn't handle everything. Adventures was complicated enough, but this is insanity.

I'll get used to it........ sometime............

Couple of random comments. Archive is awesome - it won me my first Empires playtest game, no joke. I've made good use of Encampment as well. Wild Hunt was the Gathering card I got really petty with. Wondering how something as OP as insta-thin Donate made it into the game. Delve, did you just make the Silver test irrelevant? And finally, twelve points go to... are we gonna call it "buying a Salt the Earth" or just "Salting the Earth"?
Logged
Sure it's just a game. The same way that your best friend in the whole world is "just a friend".

TwitchYouTubeMusic

!!CHANGED MY USERNAME ON 2.0!!

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #33 on: June 06, 2016, 11:13:49 pm »
+6

are we gonna call it "buying a Salt the Earth" or just "Salting the Earth"?

I usually just say, "I'm going to salt the earth."

When Adventures came out, I mentioned that playing Transmogrify made me feel like a mad scientist. Buying Salt the Earth makes me feel like an old-timey villain. "The clock is ticking, nyaah!"
Logged

chipperMDW

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 212
  • Respect: +466
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #34 on: June 06, 2016, 11:19:23 pm »
+1

Is it significant that Ritual uses past tense ("+1VP per $1 it cost") compared to, say, Apprentice, which uses present tense ("+1 Card per $ is costs")? I would assume that Ritual is intended to work the same as most other things, which look at the properties of a card after it's trashed. But the use of past tense might suggest it looks at the properties of the card at the time of trashing.

I ask because Donald has said that Treasure Map, which has been the only thing that does look at a card property at the time of trashing, should have used "did" instead of "do" to indicate that fact. So... just checking to see whether that's supposed to matter here.

(Situation where it would make a difference: while Inheriting something, trash one of your Estates while you have Quarry in play. The Estate stops being yours, so it stops being an action, and its cost stops being reduced.)
Logged

RevanFan

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #35 on: June 06, 2016, 11:21:07 pm »
0

I thought of a beautiful thing while reading the rulebook. It'll be difficult to pull off, but it would be great if it works.

First turn, buy Donate. Take the 8 debt, and trash everything except for 5 copper. Pay off the debt, but don't buy any cards when the debt is payed off. It'll take 2 turns to pay off the debt, leaving you with 2 coin left. DON'T SPEND IT. On the third turn after buying Donate, use your 5 copper to buy Windfall. Gain the 3 golds. Turn after that, Donate again to trash the rest of your copper. Pay off the debt that turn as well, if you can. Then feel free to Windfall to your heart's desire, or just buy all the Provinces.

I don't know how I thought of that, but I'm glad I did.

I'm not 100% sure on how Debt works, being that I've never played with it, but don't you have some money after you buy Donate, that you can pay off with?

So after you buy it, you spend whatever money you started with to remove some of the Debt, giving you good odds to pay the rest of it off on turn 2 with your 5 copper and Windfall turn 3.

And on turn 4 you Donate, then Windfall turn 5, and just buy Provinces turns 6-9 with decent likelihood to not draw all 3 Provinces for the last buy.
Yeah, I forgot that bit when I was posting. So, theoretically, you could have nothing but gold in your deck, and enough of it to buy a Province every turn, in four turns.

Turn 1: Buy Donate, take 8 Debt, pay off 2-5 Debt. Trash 2 Copper and 3 Estates/Shelters.
Turn 2: Pay off 2-5 Debt.
Turn 3: Buy Windfall. Gain 3 Gold.
Turn 4: Buy Donate, take 8 Debt, pay off what you can. Trash all remaining starting cards, leaving just 3 Gold in your deck.

Now, Windfall on turn 5 would be great, but it would be essential in a Colony game.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2016, 11:23:21 pm by RevanFan »
Logged

J Reggie

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 633
  • Shuffle iT Username: J Reggie
  • Respect: +971
    • View Profile
    • Jeff Rosenthal Music
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #36 on: June 06, 2016, 11:22:54 pm »
0

I think SCSN has a new favorite event in Delve.

Well, I think he'll love Bandit Fort. 

I don't think Donate will be quite as amazing as it looks at first.  Yes, it's crazy, but you'll probably only want to buy it once because of the cost, and it'll be hard knowing when to do that.  I think Chapel is probably still better.  Obviously Donate is great against junkers but so is Chapel and it costs way less.  Just saying it's probably not quite as broken as you'd think.

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #37 on: June 06, 2016, 11:23:43 pm »
0

Is it significant that Ritual uses past tense ("+1VP per $1 it cost") compared to, say, Apprentice, which uses present tense ("+1 Card per $ is costs")? I would assume that Ritual is intended to work the same as most other things, which look at the properties of a card after it's trashed. But the use of past tense might suggest it looks at the properties of the card at the time of trashing.
The cards have to be interpreted according to the wordings they actually have, but it wasn't "supposed to matter," it just happens to say what it does.
Logged

RevanFan

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #38 on: June 06, 2016, 11:24:30 pm »
0

I think SCSN has a new favorite event in Delve.

Well, I think he'll love Bandit Fort. 

I don't think Donate will be quite as amazing as it looks at first.  Yes, it's crazy, but you'll probably only want to buy it once because of the cost, and it'll be hard knowing when to do that.  I think Chapel is probably still better.  Obviously Donate is great against junkers but so is Chapel and it costs way less.  Just saying it's probably not quite as broken as you'd think.
So far, the Donate+Windfall situation I described is the only really 'excellent' way to play Donate I can think of. In any other situation, I'd probably also prefer Chapel.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #39 on: June 06, 2016, 11:29:39 pm »
+1

What happens to obelisk when there is no action supply pile?
Does it just fail to choose one or does the game break?
Logged

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2583
  • Respect: +2472
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #40 on: June 06, 2016, 11:29:43 pm »
+4

Seems to me that the right use of Donate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy donate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #41 on: June 06, 2016, 11:32:58 pm »
0

Seems to me that the right use of Donate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy donate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.
Yep sounds right to me
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #42 on: June 06, 2016, 11:35:01 pm »
+3

What happens to obelisk when there is no action supply pile?
Does it just fail to choose one or does the game break?
fail
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #43 on: June 06, 2016, 11:35:54 pm »
+4

What happens to obelisk when there is no action supply pile?
Does it just fail to choose one or does the game break?

I think the game tries to divide by zero and just returns an error.
Logged

Moneymodel

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
  • Respect: +129
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #44 on: June 06, 2016, 11:36:33 pm »
+2

Hmm. If Advance is on the board, a player who falls behind early in a Cultist-BM mirror has a better chance of catching up. You can exchange a Ruins for a Cultist, and you don't even need any money to do it.
Logged

chipperMDW

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 212
  • Respect: +466
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #45 on: June 06, 2016, 11:40:07 pm »
+2

Is it significant that Ritual uses past tense ("+1VP per $1 it cost") compared to, say, Apprentice, which uses present tense ("+1 Card per $ is costs")? I would assume that Ritual is intended to work the same as most other things, which look at the properties of a card after it's trashed. But the use of past tense might suggest it looks at the properties of the card at the time of trashing.
The cards have to be interpreted according to the wordings they actually have, but it wasn't "supposed to matter," it just happens to say what it does.
Sorry; I guess I'm being slow, but I can't tell for sure from your response: does that mean Ritual should be interpreted as checking the cost of the card in the past (i.e. at the time of trashing)?
Logged

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #46 on: June 06, 2016, 11:59:35 pm »
+3

woooh, my mind is nuked. Thanks for another amazing expansion Donald :).
 
Logged

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #47 on: June 07, 2016, 12:12:40 am »
+1

Seems to me that the right use of Detonate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy detonate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.

That's what I'm thinking. Also, this seems better  than Chapel since you can build a little before Detonating your deck. Chapel eats up those early turns and misses shuffles or estates, etc.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2016, 12:16:18 am by Beyond Awesome »
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #48 on: June 07, 2016, 12:14:12 am »
+3

Chapel is clearly one of the worst 2s, since Donate does it better.
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #49 on: June 07, 2016, 12:33:18 am »
+1

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?
Logged

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #50 on: June 07, 2016, 12:41:11 am »
+3

Salt the Earth is the best card in Dominion. Theme is absolutely on point, and the number of complete dick moves you can do with this card is absolutely endless. Amazing.
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #51 on: June 07, 2016, 12:41:30 am »
0

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?

Hmm.. Well I think the the move a token rule would also apply to any Treasure that gets VP tokens on it, such as gatherers. But I didn't check to see if there are any treasure-gathering.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2016, 12:43:05 am by GendoIkari »
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #52 on: June 07, 2016, 12:42:30 am »
0

Any recommendations on choosing the pile for Obelisk?
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #53 on: June 07, 2016, 12:43:27 am »
0

Any recommendations on choosing the pile for Obelisk?

Randomly.  ;D
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #54 on: June 07, 2016, 12:46:14 am »
+2

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?

Hmm.. Well I think the the move a token rule would also apply to any Treasure that gets VP tokens on it, such as gatherers. But I didn't check to see if there are any treasure-gathering.

Ah ha... If you have both Crown and Defiled Shrine in the game, then you'll have another treasure pile with vp tokens on it. So Aqueduct should steal tokens from that too I would think.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2016, 12:55:00 am by GendoIkari »
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #55 on: June 07, 2016, 12:48:46 am »
0

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?
No aquaduct applies to any treasure you gain and it says in the rules that you can do both if you gain something like a harem(treasure/action). so you have two reactions in which you get to choose the order, so you move 1 victory token onto aqueduct and then gain any victory points that are on aqueduct. or you can choose the opposite gain the victory points stored on it and move 1 victory token to aqueduct. 
Logged

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #56 on: June 07, 2016, 12:49:44 am »
0

I mean treasure/victory x)
Logged

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #57 on: June 07, 2016, 12:51:50 am »
+1

I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.

Bingo.
Logged

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #58 on: June 07, 2016, 12:54:06 am »
0

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?
No aquaduct applies to any treasure you gain and it says in the rules that you can do both if you gain something like a harem(treasure/action). so you have two reactions in which you get to choose the order, so you move 1 victory token onto aqueduct and then gain any victory points that are on aqueduct. or you can choose the opposite gain the victory points stored on it and move 1 victory token to aqueduct.

The point is that Humble Castle can never have VP tokens on it though.
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

chipperMDW

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 212
  • Respect: +466
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #59 on: June 07, 2016, 12:55:43 am »
+1

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?

Hmm.. Well I think the the move a token rule would also apply to any Treasure that gets VP tokens on it, such as gatherers. But I didn't check to see if there are any treasure-gathering.

Ah ha... If you have both Crown and Defiled Shrine in the game, then you'll have another treasure pile with vp tokens on it. So Aqueduct should steal tokens from that to I would think.
You beat me to it! But you would also have to have Inherited Crown to make it into both a treasure and a victory card before the Aqueduct clarification comes into play.
Logged

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #60 on: June 07, 2016, 12:56:17 am »
0

One thing I feel Empires attacks seem on the weak side
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #61 on: June 07, 2016, 12:59:35 am »
0

One thing I feel Empires attacks seem on the weak side
They are strong in an engine weak in bm. That's mostly because you have to work to get their benefit.
Logged

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #62 on: June 07, 2016, 01:01:57 am »
+1

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?

Hmm.. Well I think the the move a token rule would also apply to any Treasure that gets VP tokens on it, such as gatherers. But I didn't check to see if there are any treasure-gathering.

Ah ha... If you have both Crown and Defiled Shrine in the game, then you'll have another treasure pile with vp tokens on it. So Aqueduct should steal tokens from that to I would think.
You beat me to it! But you would also have to have Inherited Crown to make it into both a treasure and a victory card before the Aqueduct clarification comes into play.

That doesn't work does it? The Estates pile can't have VP tokens on it, so the clarification still can't matter.
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

bitwise

  • Swindler
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: +13
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #63 on: June 07, 2016, 01:03:17 am »
+1

Looking forward to (clearly) the best new strategy, Banquet/Counting House!
Logged

chipperMDW

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 212
  • Respect: +466
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #64 on: June 07, 2016, 01:07:12 am »
0

Haven't read any other threads about the new reveals and I'm still compiling one big post of first impressions.  Just wanted to put this out first on its own, since it includes a question.

Aqueduct - The clarification is confusing to me... Doesn't the Treasure part only apply to Silver and Gold?  So buying Humble Castle or Harem should only let you take VP, not move any VP to Aqueduct?  I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.  Or am I misreading something?

Hmm.. Well I think the the move a token rule would also apply to any Treasure that gets VP tokens on it, such as gatherers. But I didn't check to see if there are any treasure-gathering.

Ah ha... If you have both Crown and Defiled Shrine in the game, then you'll have another treasure pile with vp tokens on it. So Aqueduct should steal tokens from that to I would think.
You beat me to it! But you would also have to have Inherited Crown to make it into both a treasure and a victory card before the Aqueduct clarification comes into play.

That doesn't work does it? The Estates pile can't have VP tokens on it, so the clarification still can't matter.
You're correct. Never mind, then!
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #65 on: June 07, 2016, 01:11:56 am »
+9

First impressions, without reading anything else in the forums about it all...

Archive - I love it.  It's relatively simple, but creates deep tactical considerations.  I'm shocked that I haven't seen any fan cards that do this.  A fun thing is that the set aside cards can be used to track whether it should stay in play, which would otherwise be a small issue for a multi-turn Duration.  Non-terminal means you can stack these, and they even make it easier to chain multiples on the same turn (or save them for later if you prefer).  Really cool.

Charm - Treasure Woodcutter, or a Duplicate variant.  I can see this as a mega-turn card like HoP, given the right board... specifically, when Prince or Peddler are also in the kingdom, a bunch of Charms could gain all the Provinces.  But it could also be used to empty other piles, of course.  I think this will be a lot more useful than Talisman.  Very neat.

Patrician/Emporium - Patrician is like Vagrant, except it usually draws good cards instead of junk.  The downside is that "good" actually means "expensive".  Even trim decks tend to have a bunch of sub-$5 components, so Patrician is not necessarily reliable.  Even so, I think I'd prefer it over Vagrant most of the time.  And then there's Emporium... Neither card here directly references the other, but they synergize nonetheless.  Patrician makes it more likely that you'll be able to trigger Emporium's on-gain.  Emporium is another potential target for Patrician to draw.  This particular split pile isn't mind-blowing to me, but it's a nice combination.  In this case, I don't think there's a thematic connection between the two cards, but they thematically make sense for what they do.  Patricians are high class, so they bring expensive stuff with them.  Emporiums are places of commerce, so you should open them in places with high traffic and activity.

Encampment/Plunder - Plunder is a simple Silver+, giving 1VP when you play it.  It is essentially Monument as a Treasure.  Being that similar means maybe it wouldn't be that interesting as its own pile, or it might have problems (since it is essentially be non-terminal), but this is mitigated by Encampment.  Not only are there fewer Plunders to go around, but they aren't accessible early in the game, and they're still somewhat tough to pick up because of Encampment being returned to the pile.  Encampment is itself really interesting.  It's a powerful one-shot for $2.  I think I'm going to have a hard time figuring out when that alone is worthwhile, but then there's the possibility of it not being one-shot.  No doubt you will often be faced with the option of playing Encampment without Gold/Plunder in hand.  Is it better not to play it so you can keep it for a safer turn?  Do you play it and hope you draw the needed Treasure?  If that's not a possibility for whatever reason, could it be worth giving up Encampment just for its bonuses?  Or if you do have the treasure in hand, could it be good to forego the reveal and let it return to its pile, blocking Plunder?  So many considerations!  I'm not sure of the thematic narrative.  Buying an Encampment is like setting up an army for your legions?  But your legions will desert you if you don't show them you can pay?

Engineer - Obviously better than Workshop, but it doesn't seem that significant to me.  For a slightly higher cost, you get a nice bonus for when you no longer need it, letting you replace this unwanted card for something more useful.  But until you do that, it's just a Workshop.  I wonder how often it will be a good play to buy it and trash it immediately.  That would be like delaying the $4 you would have gained for a shuffle in order to get a bonus gain... hm.  My first impression is that this is marginal, but it may be a key interaction for winning certain splits.

Forum - One of the more vanilla cards.  a 1-card improvement on Warehouse, letting you sift and cycle without reducing handsize.  The on-buy doesn't seem so significant, but it makes its cost a little lower.

Legionary - A brutal attack, strong enough that it requires a Gold reveal to trigger (thematically fits with the idea of paying your military, as with Encampment?).  Interesting that it produces +$3 itself.  It's worth noting that Legionary doesn't suffer the same drawback as Margrave in multiples, since you can decline to reveal Gold.  Sounds good, though I think Margrave will prove stronger overall thanks to its set of vanilla bonuses.

Overlord - It can copy cards that cost $5, which is significantly better than BoM.  Moreover, the fixed limit means you could potentially copy extra expensive cards like King's Court or Prince if you have some cost reduction.  Fun meta note, Overlord allowed Donald X. to sneak in some rules clarifications for BoM regarding new stuff in Empires like Encampment, Crown and Colonnade.

Sacrifice - Sounds good.  You usually don't want to trash actions, so the bonus for doing that is strong.  The bonus for trashing Treasure is weaker than either Moneylender or Spice Merchant, which makes sense since Sacrifice is a lot more flexible.  Trashing Estates is great, Duchies OK, more expensive VP cards not so much.  But Estates is the big thing.  I think this will be a good counter to Looters.

Wild Hunt - You'll pick the first option most of the time since you don't want to gain a junky Estate, in which case it's basically an expensive Smithy.  But sometimes the gathering VP will be tempting... and when's the right time to pull the trigger on that?  I have no idea.  Man.  Being able to play a bunch of Wild Hunts in one turn will be pretty good, as you'll be able to pick up a bunch of VP all at once.  In that case though, it's still just +1VP per play of Wild Hunt (including the last one, if you count the Estate).  It would be more efficient to let it accumulate even more, but that risks another player scooping the VP out from under you.  Still potentially doable if they can't (or are unlikely to) play a Wild Hunt on their next turn.  I like this a lot.  Gathering cards are so neat.



Advance - Suddenly Ruins are valuable??  This really shakes up the game, potentially making expensive key cards a lot easier to pick up.

Annex - Seems useful in a slog, when your deck is a mess and you're having trouble ending the game.  Annex is <8> for a Duchy, which might be a good deal if you're having trouble hitting a full $8 or even $5 on a single turn.  The shuffle effect may improve your hands for the next few turns, making it easier to hit $8 later.  Overall, looks niche to me.

Banquet - It basically Cache-ifies other cards, making something cheaper by attaching 2 Copper to it.  Fun use: Banquet for Cache to gain 4 Copper total.  There are probably some edge cases where you'll want to use this to gain a card that costs $3 or less (e.g. Gardens-Beggar).

Conquest - Designed for SCSN, no doubt. ;)  Probably helps Big Money strategies a lot.  The stacking self-synergy is interesting.  If you have $12 and 2 Buys, it's worth as much as Province but comes with 4 Silver instead of a green card.  $18 and 3 Buys, you can get 12VP and 6 Silver, which matches 2 Provinces in VP.  $24 and 4 Buys, it's 20VP and 8 Silver, which is more than 3 Provinces and matches 2 Colonies, a great deal if you want all that Silver.  But do you want all that Silver?  It's an interesting parallel to Triumph.  It has higher (opportunity) cost and only counts Silver, but it also gains two cards each time you buy it so it grows more quickly.  Neat.

Delve - Makes Silver cheaper to buy.  Simple enough.  I don't expect this to make a difference on most boards.  It could make Silver-favouring cards (Feodum and Conquest?) more viable though, and it may give an edge to Big Money strategies where they otherwise wouldn't be competitive.  Hmm.

Donate - Wow, this turns the game on its head.  When Donate appears, you'll pretty much always want to buy it once.  But when?  Early turns spent prepping for the Donate turn will be critical.  It's designed so that you can buy it and get full benefit on any turn, which is nice.  It reminds me of Chapel, and I wonder how the two will compete.  I'm tentatively guessing that Donate will trump Chapel most of the time, but the <8> cost makes it hard to judge.

Ritual - As a VP gainer, it's more powerful than Bishop for trashing cards that cost more than $4 or more, but you have to keep buying it and you accumulate dead cards in your deck that Ritual can't effectively remove.  I really like Bishop, so I think this will be fun too.

Salt the Earth - It's a way to end the game more quickly.  Will probably be used primarily to empty piles quickly.  Players will have to watch each other carefully.  As the current points leader, is it worth the $4 and Buy to trash a Province and take another step closer to the end, or should you continue building your deck lest another player overtake you?  I like it.

Tax - Sounds like a blast.  The setup potentially gives the second player an advantage (they can mirror the first player and avoid the Debt) and the Event as a whole is basically one big catch-up mechanism.  The first to buy each VP card will take at least 1 Debt from it.  If your deck is stronger, you're probably buying more cards and thus more likely to run into placed Debt.  If you're behind, you can buy this to try to stymie the leading player.  Granted, the leader could buy this as well, but it could be self-hindering unless players are pursuing very different strategies.

Wedding - It has a Debt cost, haha.  In games where I want Gold, I think I'd buy it via Wedding most of the time.  The +1VP is nice, and the lower coin cost makes it easier to pick up anyway.  Games with Wedding will likely feature early Gold gains, which could really change the dynamic of the game.  Sounds fun.



Aqueduct - It kind of turns VP cards into Gathering cards?  Tokens accumulate, tempting players to buy Victory cards earlier than usual.  Unless nobody ever gains Silver or Gold. :P

Arena - Encourages opening with two terminals, and overloading on terminals or just actions in general.  Sometimes you might skip playing an action card just to trigger Arena.  I like it.

Bandit Fort - Well, we didn't like Silver or Gold anyway. :P

Basilica - Encourages underspending, and gives you something to do with a plethora of +Buy.  Again, sounds fun.

Baths - I bet some inexperienced groups will just spend the first several turns passing until all the VP is gone and think Baths does nothing but delay the start of the actual game.  I wonder how often it'll actually be the right call to skip a potentially productive turn for Baths VP.  I expect it'll more often end up being a consolation prize for a bad turn.  I see interesting synergy with Mission.  Notably, you could just buy Mission to get 4VP tokens for $4.

Colonnade - Weird!  So it encourages buying multiples of the same card, and the wisdom of that will depend on the cards available.  In general though, it encourages buying more actions, which is nice after all those various cards that boosted Big Money.

Defiled Shrine - I like this more than Aqueduct (not that I dislike Aqueduct).  I expect that the VP growth will be better than Aqueduct on most boards, at least among experienced players.  And unlike Aqueduct, you have to commit more to get VP from Defiled Shrine, as opposed to it being a bonus on something you'd probably buy eventually anyway.  I see that Defiled Shrine can steal VP from Gathering cards.

Labyrinth - Simply encourages +Buy.  Not mind-shattering, but they can't all be so.

Mountain Pass - OK, so this is the card with bidding.  I'm guessing that this encourages buying a Province early, for the advantage of being the last to bid.  8VP is significant, and Debt does make it an easier "buy".  I can't see it ever being a good idea to bid <40> on this in a real game.  The unlikely edge case I can come up with is if Salt the Earth has already drained most of the pile, so securing this Province will get you the win.  Hm, a similar alternative is if this 8VP will guarantee you at least half of the total VP available in the game, which is unlikely since there will usually be 7+ more Provinces to go (and with Empires, probably more ways to get VP tokens).  So what's an actual appropriate bid?  Province is 6VP for $8 and Colony is 10 VP for $11.  The average of those is 8VP for $9.5, but this is in debt and it's VP tokens with no dead card attached... <10> sounds like a great deal, and even up to around <14> is probably still good?  Man, I don't know.  Could also flip this around and wonder what the lowest reasonable bid is... I guess you may not want any debt at all if you have a very precise plan to empty piles for a win, but that's tough to work out from just a starting hand.

Museum - Automatic Fairgrounds, haha.  Fairgrounds is fun, and this guarantees that drive to diversify.  I am a fan.

Obelisk - Bold rulebook move, not specifying a randomization process.  It shows a respect for and trust in the players, which may not always be deserved. ;)  This is a very simple effect that can really skew strategy, pretty much guaranteeing that there will be competition over a given pile.  Even the weakest cards may be attractive if they are the chosen one!

Orchard - Another Fairgrounds-like Landmark, with a touch of Vineyards (especially in the name).  I like it, though I like Museum more.

Palace - Simple enough.  Maybe you'll keep some extra Copper around, depending on how many Gold you expect to gain.  If you have no extras without a set, then Palace is essentially 1VP per basic Treasure.

Tower - Weird card.  It encourages you to try to empty piles where you're winning the split already, but you might also dive in where you're losing if it seems inevitable, just to mitigate the difference.  Creates some very interesting interaction and makes 3-pile endings more likely.  Sounds great.

Triumphal Arch - Interesting.  This encourages going deep on two Action cards.  Incredible if there's a strong 2-card combo available, but still has a heavy pull on the game without.  I really like this too.

Wall - Gotta get that thin deck.  Junkers are more powerful, which is a little scary, but it sounds really fun anyway.



Overall, this looks awesome.  Just wonderful.  Great stuff.
Logged

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #66 on: June 07, 2016, 01:12:44 am »
+2

The even better Donate/Windfall

Turn 1:
Play 5 Copper, Borrow, buy Donate, pay off 6 Debt.
Draw 4 cards.
Put your Deck and discard into your hand, Trash 3 Estate/2 Copper, Discard 5 Copper, Draw 5 Copper.

Turn 2:
Play 5 Copper, Spend Baker Token, Borrow, Pay off 2 Debt, Buy Windfall, Gain 3 Golds.

rspeer

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 469
  • Respect: +872
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #67 on: June 07, 2016, 01:18:12 am »
+5

Seems to me that the right use of Detonate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy detonate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.

That's what I'm thinking. Also, this seems better  than Chapel since you can build a little before Detonating your deck. Chapel eats up those early turns and misses shuffles or estates, etc.

"Detonate" is a much more fun name for the card than "Donate". (This deck will self-destruct in... FIVE... turns.)
Logged

dbclick

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • Shuffle iT Username: dbclick
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #68 on: June 07, 2016, 01:23:00 am »
0

So much going on in those rules.  It will take a while to process.  ;D

For anyone who has the physical copy of the rulebook - does it have the Empires logo off-center like the PDF does?
Logged

Elanchana

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 697
  • Princess of Derpminion
  • Respect: +1005
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #69 on: June 07, 2016, 01:23:29 am »
0

Seems to me that the right use of Donate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy donate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.

I feel like its main purpose was to make junking attacks utterly irrelevant, but... that too.
Logged
Sure it's just a game. The same way that your best friend in the whole world is "just a friend".

TwitchYouTubeMusic

!!CHANGED MY USERNAME ON 2.0!!

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #70 on: June 07, 2016, 01:25:34 am »
0

Seems to me that the right use of Donate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy donate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.

I feel like its main purpose was to make junking attacks utterly irrelevant, but... that too.

Junking attacks aren't irrelevant though.  If you junk them after they've Donated the first time, you'll slow them down again.  If you do it enough, you may get them to buy Donate again, which isn't trivial.

It does neuter the -VP of Curses though, if they can Donate right before the end of the game.
Logged

Elanchana

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 697
  • Princess of Derpminion
  • Respect: +1005
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #71 on: June 07, 2016, 01:33:53 am »
0

Seems to me that the right use of Donate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy donate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.

I feel like its main purpose was to make junking attacks utterly irrelevant, but... that too.

Junking attacks aren't irrelevant though.  If you junk them after they've Donated the first time, you'll slow them down again.  If you do it enough, you may get them to buy Donate again, which isn't trivial.

It does neuter the -VP of Curses though, if they can Donate right before the end of the game.

Don't forget that it's essentially free when you buy it, and if they already have enough good cards (that are just getting blocked by the junk) they can pay off the debt really easily in the next turn or two. I was thinking more along the lines of "Donate is on the board, do I really want to get this Mountebank instead of building my engine?"
Logged
Sure it's just a game. The same way that your best friend in the whole world is "just a friend".

TwitchYouTubeMusic

!!CHANGED MY USERNAME ON 2.0!!

chipperMDW

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 212
  • Respect: +466
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #72 on: June 07, 2016, 01:35:18 am »
+2

Forum - One of the more vanilla cards.  a 1-card improvement on Warehouse, letting you sift and cycle without reducing handsize.  The on-buy doesn't seem so significant, but it makes its cost a little lower.
I've been thinking of Forum as basically Fugitive's big brother

Advance - Suddenly Ruins are valuable??  This really shakes up the game, potentially making expensive key cards a lot easier to pick up.
It also likes Necropolis. Could we manage a 6/5 opening before? And that's before you even consider stuff like Baker.
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #73 on: June 07, 2016, 01:37:35 am »
0

Seems to me that the right use of Donate is to first buy cards which give some economy without any regard for thinning and then buy donate, trash all 10 starting cards, and transition into an engine.

I feel like its main purpose was to make junking attacks utterly irrelevant, but... that too.

Junking attacks aren't irrelevant though.  If you junk them after they've Donated the first time, you'll slow them down again.  If you do it enough, you may get them to buy Donate again, which isn't trivial.

It does neuter the -VP of Curses though, if they can Donate right before the end of the game.

Don't forget that it's essentially free when you buy it, and if they already have enough good cards (that are just getting blocked by the junk) they can pay off the debt really easily in the next turn or two. I was thinking more along the lines of "Donate is on the board, do I really want to get this Mountebank instead of building my engine?"

Yeah, but that's still $8 you would have to pay for Donate instead of other things, and it's a junk card in your deck until your next Donat[ion].  If I give you one Curse, are you going to pay $8 just to get rid of it?  Probably not, so you'll have to live with that Curse for a while.  If I give you a second Curse, what then?  And how much are you willing to put up with until you Donate?  If you didn't wait until the Curses were gone, will you Donate a third time to get rid of any that come after?
Logged

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #74 on: June 07, 2016, 01:43:51 am »
+1

Labyrinth - Simply encourages +Buy.  Not mind-shattering, but they can't all be so.

Actually it encourages extra gains. :)) It's a small distinction, but it means there are a lot more ways to get Labyrinth VP.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #75 on: June 07, 2016, 02:12:21 am »
+1

Sorry; I guess I'm being slow, but I can't tell for sure from your response: does that mean Ritual should be interpreted as checking the cost of the card in the past (i.e. at the time of trashing)?
Since it says "cost" instead of "costs," it goes by what the card cost then, not what it costs now. If this causes a problem I will switch it but having not given it any thought yet, that's how it works.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #76 on: June 07, 2016, 02:13:43 am »
0

I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.

Bingo.
Also this wording is simpler.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #77 on: June 07, 2016, 02:28:42 am »
0

For anyone who has the physical copy of the rulebook - does it have the Empires logo off-center like the PDF does?
Yes. Thanks; reported.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #78 on: June 07, 2016, 02:31:19 am »
+2

I'm not sure of the thematic narrative.  Buying an Encampment is like setting up an army for your legions?  But your legions will desert you if you don't show them you can pay?
Encampments move around. And yes your army seriously cares about pay.
Logged

trivialknot

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 565
  • Respect: +904
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #79 on: June 07, 2016, 02:41:04 am »
0

Oh!  Archive lets you choose the order that you draw the cards.  So you can leave the bad cards out of your deck for longer, and draw the best of three immediately.  Probably not as bad in a draw your deck engine as people are saying.
Logged

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #80 on: June 07, 2016, 02:59:45 am »
0

Charm looks pretty awesome. The fact that it activates on every buy while also potentially providing Buys makes it a mini-Haggler that is weaker when greening but has the same crazy 3-pile potential, but is easier to fit into a deck.

Overall, it seems to me that Empires' mix of cards is shifting even more towards having fewer terminals and more good alt-treasure payload. What is left as terminal is mostly attacks and terminal draw.

I haven't run any maths, though. It's just a feeling.

Also, nobody has mentioned it yet, so I'll point out the obvious: Forum+cost reduction is the insta-pile card that we've all been waiting for.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #81 on: June 07, 2016, 03:04:04 am »
+2

Charm looks pretty awesome. The fact that it activates on every buy while also potentially providing Buys makes it a mini-Haggler that is weaker when greening but has the same crazy 3-pile potential, but is easier to fit into a deck.
It doesn't. It's "the next time you buy a card this turn..."
Logged

Burning Skull

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1116
  • Shuffle iT Username: Burning Skull
  • See you in the Outpost
  • Respect: +1759
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #82 on: June 07, 2016, 03:07:54 am »
+1

Bandit Fort or how to play Dominion: highly professional tip for mediocre Dominion players in only one sentence!

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #83 on: June 07, 2016, 03:13:12 am »
0

Also, no junking Attack other than Catapult, and no trashing attack other than Enchantress.
Interesting.

I believe all other sets had a straight-up "Every other player gains a bad thing or two" and most large sets have trashing attacks too (Intrigue, Dark ages, and Adventures have two; Base, Seaside, and Hinterlands one; Prosperity none).

Charm looks pretty awesome. The fact that it activates on every buy while also potentially providing Buys makes it a mini-Haggler that is weaker when greening but has the same crazy 3-pile potential, but is easier to fit into a deck.
It doesn't. It's "the next time you buy a card this turn..."


Oh noes. You break my heart.  :'( :)
Logged

AJD

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2863
  • Shuffle iT Username: AJD
  • Respect: +3567
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #84 on: June 07, 2016, 03:29:41 am »
+1

Also, no junking Attack other than Catapult, and no trashing attack other than Enchantress.
Interesting.

Indeed, no trashing attack including Enchantress.
Logged

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #85 on: June 07, 2016, 03:34:44 am »
+1

Also, no junking Attack other than Catapult, and no trashing attack other than Enchantress.
Interesting.

Indeed, no trashing attack including Enchantress.

Enchantress can be grossly approximated to being kind of close-ish to a sort of trashing attack.
Logged

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #86 on: June 07, 2016, 05:50:28 am »
+1


Mountain Pass - OK, so this is the card with bidding.  I'm guessing that this encourages buying a Province early, for the advantage of being the last to bid.  8VP is significant, and Debt does make it an easier "buy".  I can't see it ever being a good idea to bid <40> on this in a real game.  The unlikely edge case I can come up with is if Salt the Earth has already drained most of the pile, so securing this Province will get you the win.  Hm, a similar alternative is if this 8VP will guarantee you at least half of the total VP available in the game, which is unlikely since there will usually be 7+ more Provinces to go (and with Empires, probably more ways to get VP tokens).  So what's an actual appropriate bid?  Province is 6VP for $8 and Colony is 10 VP for $11.  The average of those is 8VP for $9.5, but this is in debt and it's VP tokens with no dead card attached... <10> sounds like a great deal, and even up to around <14> is probably still good?  Man, I don't know.  Could also flip this around and wonder what the lowest reasonable bid is... I guess you may not want any debt at all if you have a very precise plan to empty piles for a win, but that's tough to work out from just a starting hand.


Maybe the colonies are already empty and the opponent bought province afterwards  :P

Similarly, if your opponents piles out and needs to get a province to win, this will stop him aswell.

Slightly related pro move: With tower on the board, you can pile out on a points lead and lose. (Wolf den and Wall aswell, but these are easier to see on the point counter)
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

junkers

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
  • Respect: +95
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #87 on: June 07, 2016, 05:56:00 am »
+2

I'm having a hard time taking all this in, so I think I'll treat it like the previews and just analyze a couple a day until I get my hands on a copy.

Genuinely laughed out loud when I read Salt the Earth, though. My playgroup loves dick moves more than anything, and I can see this becoming a mainstay.

Why do I have the feeling that most of this post is going to wind up in the "out of context thread"?

Bandit Fort or how to play Dominion: highly professional tip for mediocre Dominion players in only one sentence!
Between Bandit Fort and Donate, I think that's this expansion's theme: git gud.

EDIT:
Also, wero (and anyone else assisting at the time): you're a goddamn champ and made my lunch hour more than bearable.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2016, 05:58:26 am by junkers »
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2688
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2867
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #88 on: June 07, 2016, 05:56:40 am »
0


Mountain Pass - OK, so this is the card with bidding.  I'm guessing that this encourages buying a Province early, for the advantage of being the last to bid.  8VP is significant, and Debt does make it an easier "buy".  I can't see it ever being a good idea to bid <40> on this in a real game.  The unlikely edge case I can come up with is if Salt the Earth has already drained most of the pile, so securing this Province will get you the win.  Hm, a similar alternative is if this 8VP will guarantee you at least half of the total VP available in the game, which is unlikely since there will usually be 7+ more Provinces to go (and with Empires, probably more ways to get VP tokens).  So what's an actual appropriate bid?  Province is 6VP for $8 and Colony is 10 VP for $11.  The average of those is 8VP for $9.5, but this is in debt and it's VP tokens with no dead card attached... <10> sounds like a great deal, and even up to around <14> is probably still good?  Man, I don't know.  Could also flip this around and wonder what the lowest reasonable bid is... I guess you may not want any debt at all if you have a very precise plan to empty piles for a win, but that's tough to work out from just a starting hand.

I think bidding first is better if both players are perfect. The only advantage of going last is that you have to think less about what you bid. If both players know what the 8VP are "worth" in the situation, the first player to bid just bids that exact amount. the second player can't do that.
Logged

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2688
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2867
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #89 on: June 07, 2016, 06:22:24 am »
+4

Salting a Feodum sounds awesome.
Logged

faust

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1970
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
  • Respect: +2755
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #90 on: June 07, 2016, 06:56:20 am »
+1

I want to play Obelisk-Rats.
Logged
Since the number of points is within a constant factor of the number of city quarters, in the long run we can get (4 - ε) ↑↑ n points in n turns for any ε > 0.

tailred

  • Golem
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 187
  • Shuffle iT Username: ceviri
  • Respect: +345
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #91 on: June 07, 2016, 07:22:17 am »
+2

Delve - Makes Silver cheaper to buy.  Simple enough.  I don't expect this to make a difference on most boards.  It could make Silver-favouring cards (Feodum and Conquest?) more viable though, and it may give an edge to Big Money strategies where they otherwise wouldn't be competitive.  Hmm.
Don't forget the +buy - it's not just cheaper, it's more easily multi-buyable, meaning $4's a ton better if you want silvers.
Logged

ThetaSigma12

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1516
  • Shuffle iT Username: ThetaSigma12
  • Respect: +1575
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #92 on: June 07, 2016, 07:41:25 am »
0

Palace and Museum need their effects switched. This is what, the second time somebody's called a card by suggesting it for the mini-set design contest?
Logged
If you have a fan card you want to be created, just post about it here! I'd love to take a look at it.

ThetaSigma12

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1516
  • Shuffle iT Username: ThetaSigma12
  • Respect: +1575
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #93 on: June 07, 2016, 07:42:46 am »
0

I want to play Obelisk-Rats.
With the perfect setup this could be a thing, training on rats and use dominate/salt the earth for VP.
Logged
If you have a fan card you want to be created, just post about it here! I'd love to take a look at it.

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #94 on: June 07, 2016, 07:49:10 am »
0

I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.

Bingo.
Also this wording is simpler.

eHalcyon is talking about the FAQ, not the wording on the card.
Logged

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #95 on: June 07, 2016, 08:41:41 am »
0

One thing I'm confused about though is with capital can you pay off the debt on your clean-up phase then or do you still have to wait next turn to pay it off? I would guess that you would have to pay it off next turn, but the rules say that you have a extra chance then to pay your debt on your clean up phase if I'm reading it right, but that's when you've already discarded all your actions and treasures.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #96 on: June 07, 2016, 08:47:40 am »
+2

One thing I'm confused about though is with capital can you pay off the debt on your clean-up phase then or do you still have to wait next turn to pay it off? I would guess that you would have to pay it off next turn, but the rules say that you have a extra chance then to pay your debt on your clean up phase if I'm reading it right, but that's when you've already discarded all your actions and treasures.
It says you can pay it off at the end of your turn on the card.
Logged

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
  • Respect: +1329
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #97 on: June 07, 2016, 08:47:47 am »
+1

So sexy.
Logged
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #98 on: June 07, 2016, 09:00:57 am »
0

One thing I'm confused about though is with capital can you pay off the debt on your clean-up phase then or do you still have to wait next turn to pay it off? I would guess that you would have to pay it off next turn, but the rules say that you have a extra chance then to pay your debt on your clean up phase if I'm reading it right, but that's when you've already discarded all your actions and treasures.
It says you can pay it off at the end of your turn on the card.
The problem is you don't get the debt until you discard it from play and the only way to really discard it from play is go directly to your clean-up phase at which point your already going to be discarding all your actions and treasures that gave you the money in the first place unless somehow that money is still retained on your clean-up phase so I'm not sure.
Logged

Sidsel

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 121
  • Respect: +171
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #99 on: June 07, 2016, 09:06:16 am »
0

I'm not sure I get how D(et)onate works. "After your turn", that means after discarding everything from play, right? But is it before or after drawing 5 cards? And how do you "shuffle your hand into your deck", when everything is already in your hand?
Logged

faust

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1970
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
  • Respect: +2755
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #100 on: June 07, 2016, 09:16:21 am »
0

Obscure rules questions time!

If I play BoM-as-Encampment, and don't reveal anything, what happens? The way I see it, I would set it aside (thereby BoM stops being an Encampment), and at the start of cleanup, there's a blue dog situation because it is unclear what "return it to the supply" means now. So does BoM just remain set aside for the rest of the game, or does it go back to the BoM pile? I assume it doesn't go to the Encampment pile, because that would be crazy.
Logged
Since the number of points is within a constant factor of the number of city quarters, in the long run we can get (4 - ε) ↑↑ n points in n turns for any ε > 0.

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #101 on: June 07, 2016, 09:18:29 am »
+1

I think it's pretty clear you return BoM to the supply, because the effect is set up as you set the card aside and not later. You return the card to its normal pile.
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #102 on: June 07, 2016, 09:19:12 am »
+3

I think it's pretty clear you return BoM to the supply, because the effect is set up as you set the card aside and not later. You return the card to its normal pile.

This is covered in the Overlord FAQ.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

flaquito

  • Steward
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: +36
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #103 on: June 07, 2016, 09:19:48 am »
+1

I'm not sure I get how D(et)onate works. "After your turn", that means after discarding everything from play, right? But is it before or after drawing 5 cards?

It's after you draw your 5 (or 3 for outpost) cards. Your entire deck will end up in your hand.

And how do you "shuffle your hand into your deck", when everything is already in your hand?

Place all cards from hand in draw pile. Shuffle draw pile. Draw 5 cards.
Logged

Mic Qsenoch

  • 2015 DS Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1650
  • Respect: +4170
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #104 on: June 07, 2016, 09:20:40 am »
+2

One thing I'm confused about though is with capital can you pay off the debt on your clean-up phase then or do you still have to wait next turn to pay it off? I would guess that you would have to pay it off next turn, but the rules say that you have a extra chance then to pay your debt on your clean up phase if I'm reading it right, but that's when you've already discarded all your actions and treasures.
It says you can pay it off at the end of your turn on the card.
The problem is you don't get the debt until you discard it from play and the only way to really discard it from play is go directly to your clean-up phase at which point your already going to be discarding all your actions and treasures that gave you the money in the first place unless somehow that money is still retained on your clean-up phase so I'm not sure.

You still have any leftover money during your clean-up phase. Money isn't tied to having Treasures or whatever in play, it's just tied to having played them sometime earlier during your turn.
Logged

Elestan

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 456
  • Respect: +420
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #105 on: June 07, 2016, 09:28:20 am »
+2

Also, nobody has mentioned it yet, so I'll point out the obvious: Forum+cost reduction is the insta-pile card that we've all been waiting for.

Villa works as well.
Logged

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #106 on: June 07, 2016, 09:36:54 am »
0

One thing I'm confused about though is with capital can you pay off the debt on your clean-up phase then or do you still have to wait next turn to pay it off? I would guess that you would have to pay it off next turn, but the rules say that you have a extra chance then to pay your debt on your clean up phase if I'm reading it right, but that's when you've already discarded all your actions and treasures.
It says you can pay it off at the end of your turn on the card.
The problem is you don't get the debt until you discard it from play and the only way to really discard it from play is go directly to your clean-up phase at which point your already going to be discarding all your actions and treasures that gave you the money in the first place unless somehow that money is still retained on your clean-up phase so I'm not sure.

You still have any leftover money during your clean-up phase. Money isn't tied to having Treasures or whatever in play, it's just tied to having played them sometime earlier during your turn.
Ahh I see, I didn't know that but that makes sense. thanks Mic Qsenoch
Logged

Asper

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4337
  • Respect: +4736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #107 on: June 07, 2016, 09:40:23 am »
0

So, without knowing whether there are going to be further clarifications in Guilds/Alchemy reprints: Is it true that i can now both spend my opponent's coin tokens AND use his Baker to get coin tokens when i possess him?

Edit: Apparently there's a discussion about the Possession errata already. I'll ask there.

Edit Edit: Apparently that thread has been closed, so nevermind.

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #108 on: June 07, 2016, 09:55:21 am »
+3

If you have Charm in a Kingdom with two of the 8 Debt cost cards, you can get a 2 for 1 deal, and you don't even have to have any money to start with.

Elestan

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 456
  • Respect: +420
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #109 on: June 07, 2016, 10:02:36 am »
0

Donate - Wow, this turns the game on its head.

Indeed.  Villa was the card that most twisted my head in knots trying to think through the game mechanics implications, but Donate was my biggest OMG moment.  I'm particularly interested in seeing how the strategies for best using it evolve.

Quote
Mountain Pass - OK, so this is the card with bidding[...]

...and hopefully people now understand why the fears about a bidding mechanic were perhaps somewhat overblown.  :-)
Logged

ephesos

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 310
  • Shuffle iT Username: Ephesos
  • Respect: +262
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #110 on: June 07, 2016, 10:03:37 am »
+9

So if I play Overlord as BoM as Conspirator, do I get the +1 Card, +1 Action when I play Conspirator for playing 3 actions?
Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4733
  • Respect: +3320
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #111 on: June 07, 2016, 10:05:14 am »
+2

I would think so.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #112 on: June 07, 2016, 10:06:34 am »
0

Also, nobody has mentioned it yet, so I'll point out the obvious: Forum+cost reduction is the insta-pile card that we've all been waiting for.

Villa works as well.

Yes, but a load of Fora don't hurt your deck, while too many Villae probably do. :)

Looking forward to all the fun plurals, btw.

(stretching it as far as decently possible, you also have Gladiatores, Basilicae, Emporia, Arenae, and Musea)
Logged

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #113 on: June 07, 2016, 10:17:29 am »
0


Also, nobody has mentioned it yet, so I'll point out the obvious: Forum+cost reduction is the insta-pile card that we've all been waiting for.

Didn't Rats already do that?
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #114 on: June 07, 2016, 10:17:55 am »
+1

So if I play Overlord as BoM as Conspirator, do I get the +1 Card, +1 Action when I play Conspirator for playing 3 actions?

Plus all tokens from all 3 piles!
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

J Reggie

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 633
  • Shuffle iT Username: J Reggie
  • Respect: +971
    • View Profile
    • Jeff Rosenthal Music
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #115 on: June 07, 2016, 10:35:11 am »
+2

So many new cards; I'll post my first impressions of my favorites.

Forum: I've been hoping for a card line this for a while. We really have needed more sifters that preserve your handsize. I really like the cost, how yes it costs $5 but not a buy. I foresee jokes about the name.

Engineer: I like how the debt cost helps balance this card, not because you would normally pay less for it up front, but because you can't do crazy things with trashing Engineers to gain Engineers and then play them to gain more cards.

Delve: I want to add "like Silver" to the end of the rulebook entry.  :D

Sacrifice: I guess the flavor fits in with Tribute rather than Iron. I do like how it does slightly different things than similar cards. And it provides a reason why you might actually want to trash Estate-Crowns if that worked, so that question didn't go to waste. It's cool to finally have a trashing village.

Ritual: I love Bishop, so I think I'll like this. It's great if you have a way to get rid of those curses. I can see it being really good with Provinces and Colonies.

Defiled Shrine: I just love the interaction with Curses here. Curse is such a good card!

Sidsel

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 121
  • Respect: +171
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #116 on: June 07, 2016, 11:20:37 am »
0

Messenger or Ambassador on a split pile - how does that work? Do you stop when you run out of the similarly named card, or continue digging down the pile?
Logged

Mic Qsenoch

  • 2015 DS Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1650
  • Respect: +4170
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #117 on: June 07, 2016, 11:23:17 am »
+7

Messenger or Ambassador on a split pile - how does that work? Do you stop when you run out of the similarly named card, or continue digging down the pile?

It's not any different from Ruins or Knights, you stop when the card name doesn't match.
Logged

SCSN

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2226
  • Respect: +7117
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #118 on: June 07, 2016, 11:50:14 am »
+33

I think SCSN has a new favorite event in Delve.

Logged

SuperHans

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
  • Respect: +190
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #119 on: June 07, 2016, 11:52:55 am »
0

Obelisk + Port looks entertaining. Who is the village idiot now?
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #120 on: June 07, 2016, 11:55:19 am »
0

So if I play Overlord as BoM as Conspirator, do I get the +1 Card, +1 Action when I play Conspirator for playing 3 actions?

Sadly not.

But you presumably do get the benefit of any of your tokens on Overlord, on BoM and on what you play BoM as. That alone could be an epic hack to get around Teacher's restriction.
Logged

singletee

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 843
  • Shuffle iT Username: singletee
  • Gold, Silver, Copper, Let's Jam!
  • Respect: +1455
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #121 on: June 07, 2016, 11:57:35 am »
+4

So if I play Overlord as BoM as Conspirator, do I get the +1 Card, +1 Action when I play Conspirator for playing 3 actions?

Sadly not.

But you presumably do get the benefit of any of your tokens on Overlord, on BoM and on what you play BoM as. That alone could be an epic hack to get around Teacher's restriction.

Happily so. (Donald reversed the ruling to which you linked.)

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #122 on: June 07, 2016, 12:00:35 pm »
0

I don't think Donate will be quite as amazing as it looks at first.  Yes, it's crazy, but you'll probably only want to buy it once because of the cost, and it'll be hard knowing when to do that.
One use case I can think of: when you have a 4/3 or 3/4 split and there's a $5 card you really must have ASAP.

Buy Donate on your first turn, eliminating your Estates and two Coppers. Pay off the remaining debt on turn two. Turn three, you're certain to have a $5 hand. Turn four, you're 83% likely to draw your shiny $5 card, and if you don't you have $5 to buy a second.
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #123 on: June 07, 2016, 12:04:52 pm »
0

Delve - Makes Silver cheaper to buy.  Simple enough.  I don't expect this to make a difference on most boards.  It could make Silver-favouring cards (Feodum and Conquest?) more viable though, and it may give an edge to Big Money strategies where they otherwise wouldn't be competitive.  Hmm.
Don't forget the +buy - it's not just cheaper, it's more easily multi-buyable, meaning $4's a ton better if you want silvers.

Not forgotten; refunding the Buy is another way it is cheaper!
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #124 on: June 07, 2016, 12:06:06 pm »
0

Sadly not.
Happily so. (Donald reversed the ruling to which you linked.)
OK. I grant that you sound like you know what you're talking about, but is there any evidence the ruling in the Wiki is more recent than the ruling in that thread?
Logged

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #125 on: June 07, 2016, 12:06:30 pm »
+1

Sadly not.
Happily so. (Donald reversed the ruling to which you linked.)
OK. I grant that you sound like you know what you're talking about, but is there any evidence the ruling in the Wiki is more recent than the ruling in that thread?

I can confirm that it is.
Logged

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #126 on: June 07, 2016, 12:20:09 pm »
+3

Sadly not.
Happily so. (Donald reversed the ruling to which you linked.)
OK. I grant that you sound like you know what you're talking about, but is there any evidence the ruling in the Wiki is more recent than the ruling in that thread?

Here's the official reversal, from April 2015: http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13115.msg487471#msg487471
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #127 on: June 07, 2016, 12:38:11 pm »
+8

Guys, I just realized: no Reaction in empires!
We hadn't had a Reaction-less big set since Seaside.
Logged

ThetaSigma12

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1516
  • Shuffle iT Username: ThetaSigma12
  • Respect: +1575
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #128 on: June 07, 2016, 12:44:54 pm »
+2

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

Overlord: BoM 2.0? Never saw that coming. I don't like how it's such a good opener, I do like the interaction with highway and such. I'm glad this skips the clunky wording of BoM. Man, I still don't get BoM's wording. More great art from a new artist! The pics a little low quality but I like the look on his face.

Encampment/Plunder: Encampment seems great. Reminds me of Co0kiel0rd's Building Cranes and Asper's Alley. I.e, a one-shot that returns itself to the supply. I wonder why it sets itself aside instead of going straight to the supply. I appreciate it mentions plunder, that's what I want in split pile, more on that in Patrician and friend. Plunder seems great. My gut tells me it's way better than Harem (And with better art to boot!). I don't like the art on plunder. Encampment is good enough art put plunder has the same problem of fortune, it just doesn't say "Plunder". It needs to focus more on the treasure, not just some gold crap against a dark background.

Patrician/Emporium: I like the simplicity. Even with all the newfangled debt and landmarks and complicated rules you have easy things like forum and emporium. Patrician seems weak, I'd buy vagrant over it. Thanks for having the right wording on this *cough* Envoy *cough*. Emporium seems nice, but I wonder if it's ever worth buying one of these without the VP bonus. This seems like a nice low-key pile. Not an insta-buy (Page, Ambassador), not a niche card (Adventurer, Counting House). Now what I hate: The cards don't have enough synergy. Sure patrician guarantees there will be 5 cards for emporium, and emporium is 5 for patrician, but these would have worked on plies by themselves IMO.


Sacrifice: Great card, not much to say. I like the essential bishoping of estates, and the interaction with ruins. Here's my biggest complaint: What the heck is up with the formatting? There is like a mile of spaces in between the "Action Card" and "+2 Cards, +2 Actions". Why? Doesn't seem consistent with ironworks.

Archive: Great card, I hope we get more 3 turn durations in future expansions. Not much to say, other than it's not Archivist, there's already a fan card named that and it's a pain to rename them.

Charm: Awesome card! I like it better than HoP by far. I thought the +Buy wasn't supposed to be bold though. Wonder which effect would be used more. I'm leaning twords the second but I think the first will be better many times. COMBO: Charm/Tournament/Prince: Solve that age-old problem by letting you get the prince AND the province at the same time! (Yes I know it's not that good) The art/name seems a little confusing. No doubt it will be clearer on the physical card. Charm is a stretch, but hey, we're running out of names.

Forum: Yeah, simplicity. Nothing to say about this, it's pretty boring. The whole "Holy Crap, Insta-pie w/highway" thing was shown with Villa, so nothing to say there. More art by Ryan Laukat!

Legionary: Killer attack! This seems like a phenomenal card, a terminal gold is great for $5. Tenatively, this seems better than Maragrave. I'm a huge fan of the art.

Wild Hunt: Ghost card, Yes! I love the name. But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! It doesn't put cards on top of your deck! The theme is ruined! WHY??????
It seems a bit weak, but smithys are good. The artist really nailed this one.

I'll cover the events and whatnot later.
Logged
If you have a fan card you want to be created, just post about it here! I'd love to take a look at it.

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #129 on: June 07, 2016, 12:49:08 pm »
+13

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #130 on: June 07, 2016, 01:01:13 pm »
+1

Maybe somebody (wero, obviously) could add citations for rulings to the wiki?

Official Adventures art is missing too... 
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #131 on: June 07, 2016, 01:11:22 pm »
0

Guys, I just realized: no Reaction in empires!
We hadn't had a Reaction-less big set since Seaside.
Actually, I'm a bit surprised that all the Landmarks are green-border. Arguably, ten of the twenty-one should have been blue as they react to things which you do in game rather than affecting final scoring.
Logged

AJD

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2863
  • Shuffle iT Username: AJD
  • Respect: +3567
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #132 on: June 07, 2016, 01:26:40 pm »
0

Encampment/Plunder: Encampment seems great. Reminds me of Co0kiel0rd's Building Cranes and Asper's Alley. I.e, a one-shot that returns itself to the supply. I wonder why it sets itself aside instead of going straight to the supply.

I assume the reason is something like, so you can't just gain it back right away. (This has the interesting side effect that if you get Encampment from the Black Market, it just ends up set aside permanently.)

By the way, here's a lose-track issue that I was surprised not to see mentioned in the Encampment FAQ: Crown Encampment, +2 cards, don't have a Gold or Plunder, +2 more cards, oh goody I drew a Gold, now I want to reveal it. In this case the Encampment still returns to the supply, though, right? If you play an Encampment multiple times, you have to reveal Gold or Plunder each time in order to save it.
Logged

MattTV

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: +12
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #133 on: June 07, 2016, 01:31:19 pm »
+1

My favorite cards so far would have to be:

Action: Archives-This is probably my new favorite duration card and duration cards happen to be my favorite so maybe I'm biased but this card is amazing. I love the idea of setting aside a mini hand for yourself that you can pull out to use each turn. If you have enough of them you can essentially access your entire deck for 3 turns!! A much more convenient version of haven/native village. This will certainly help the legionary challenge.

Treasure: Capital-this was hard cause I really like charm and obviously fortune, but capital just seems to have that tactician-feel where your like "heck yeah I'm going for it" you can get a mega money turn now and maybe forgo your next turn depending on how you use it, so it's probably my third favorite next to counterfeit and coin of the realm.

Event: Donate- well donate is self-explanatory in the sense that you can build up your deck and then customize it to your liking; throwing out all the baggage.

Landmark: Triumphal Arch-It would have been mountain pass if it activated more than once but the bid only starts with the first province bought. Although I think Triumphal Arch is really cool and feels different in the sense that your not just thinking about how am I going to get x amount cards or silvers etc for gardens or feodum to be of value, your more thinking alright what actions should I get the most of and which other action is going to be the easiest to buy out for some real points. So i like the deeper level of thinking.
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #134 on: June 07, 2016, 01:39:29 pm »
+3

By the way, here's a lose-track issue that I was surprised not to see mentioned in the Encampment FAQ: Crown Encampment, +2 cards, don't have a Gold or Plunder, +2 more cards, oh goody I drew a Gold, now I want to reveal it. In this case the Encampment still returns to the supply, though, right? If you play an Encampment multiple times, you have to reveal Gold or Plunder each time in order to save it.
That doesn't feel precisely like a lose-track issue.

When you play Encampment the first time, you fail to reveal a Gold or Plunder, you set it aside. Second time you play it, either you reveal a Gold or Plunder in which case nothing happens (it stays set aside, destined to return to its pile), or you don't, in which case presumably the second play does lose track because it's already been set aside, but that has no consequence?

Relatedly, I'm assuming a Procession of Encampments gets set aside if you fail to reveal Gold or Plunder on either or both playings, with the trashing losing track. But if you do reveal Gold or Plunder, it doesn't get set aside, so it does get trashed.
Logged

ThetaSigma12

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1516
  • Shuffle iT Username: ThetaSigma12
  • Respect: +1575
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #135 on: June 07, 2016, 01:45:36 pm »
0

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.
Logged
If you have a fan card you want to be created, just post about it here! I'd love to take a look at it.

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #136 on: June 07, 2016, 01:49:53 pm »
+7

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.

Not very many means there were some, so it's still accurate?? And the lack thereof might be exaggerated because history books tend to focus on the men and ignore the women.
Logged

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #137 on: June 07, 2016, 02:02:09 pm »
0

Engineer: The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist.

Overlord: More great art from a new artist!

Legionary: I'm a huge fan of the art.

I would be happy if Elisa Cella did all the Dominion art, forever. I'm disappointed there isn't more art from her in Empires!
Logged

SuperHans

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
  • Respect: +190
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #138 on: June 07, 2016, 02:08:17 pm »
+6

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.

Not very many means there were some, so it's still accurate?? And the lack thereof might be exaggerated because history books tend to focus on the men and ignore the women.
If we ever get a kingdom card named King, I hope it depicts a woman.
Logged

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #139 on: June 07, 2016, 02:10:09 pm »
+21

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.

Dominion isn't history though. There certainly weren't any Enchantresses or Ghost Ships or Scrying Pools or real Alchemists in historical times; so why not make the world a little better and more equal rather than constraining ourselves to the sexism of the past?

That people see the word "Engineer" and think "male" is more than enough reason to not do that, really. That gender conception exists TODAY.
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

crlundy

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
  • Respect: +187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #140 on: June 07, 2016, 02:36:32 pm »
+1

Wow, this is the first set with no blank cards, right? Making use of every last card.
Logged

pacovf

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3297
  • Multiediting poster
  • Respect: +3638
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #141 on: June 07, 2016, 02:52:48 pm »
+4

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.

Dominion isn't history though. There certainly weren't any Enchantresses or Ghost Ships or Scrying Pools or real Alchemists in historical times; so why not make the world a little better and more equal rather than constraining ourselves to the sexism of the past?

That people see the word "Engineer" and Dthink "male" is more than enough reason to not do that, really. That gender conception exists TODAY.

We've had this discussion before! Many times! It always ends about the way you expect these discussions to end! Bring it to RSP if you want to keep discussing it! Please!

Was that enough exclamation marks!
Logged
pacovf has a neopets account.  It has 999 hours logged.  All his neopets are named "Jessica".  I guess that must be his ex.

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #142 on: June 07, 2016, 03:11:38 pm »
+2

One thing I've noticed is that it feels like the Villages are harder to pull off vs. DA and Adventures.

Encampment returns to the pile a lot of times, Bustling Village is the bottom card of a split pile, Villa does not draw a card, and Crown is a TR variant which tend to take more work to get going if it is the only village on the board, oh, and City Quarter cost 8 debt which is pricey. I guess we also have Sacrifice, but man, if that were the only source of Village on the board, that would probably be a hard engine to pull off.

The trashing in this expansion seems pretty strong though.
Logged

DLloyd09

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: +46
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #143 on: June 07, 2016, 03:32:25 pm »
0

Wow, this is the first set with no blank cards, right? Making use of every last card.

Alchemy, Cornucopia, and Dark Ages also had no blanks.
Logged

dbclick

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • Shuffle iT Username: dbclick
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #144 on: June 07, 2016, 04:29:56 pm »
0

Attempted a proxy game with Mountain Pass and Tax and this question came up (as it could have changed the outcome):

If the first Province gained is is on the same turn that triggers the end condition (e.g. 3 pile), does the Mountain Pass bidding still happen or not? (the base rules say to end the game, but the Mountain Pass says to do the bidding after that turn - which rule overrules?)
Logged

crlundy

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
  • Respect: +187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #145 on: June 07, 2016, 04:34:45 pm »
+2

Wow, this is the first set with no blank cards, right? Making use of every last card.

Alchemy, Cornucopia, and Dark Ages also had no blanks.
Well, it's not the first falsehood I've ever posted here. All sweet sets.
Logged

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #146 on: June 07, 2016, 04:38:22 pm »
+1

Attempted a proxy game with Mountain Pass and Tax and this question came up (as it could have changed the outcome):

If the first Province gained is is on the same turn that triggers the end condition (e.g. 3 pile), does the Mountain Pass bidding still happen or not? (the base rules say to end the game, but the Mountain Pass says to do the bidding after that turn - which rule overrules?)

Someone asked if Donate would still happen if you bought it when piling out the game, and Donald said no. Also, if you pile out the game in the process of trashing cards to Donate (e.g. Hunting Grounds or Catacombs), the end condition is not checked until the end of the next turn, so the game continues until at least then.

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #147 on: June 07, 2016, 04:48:24 pm »
+1

I'm guessing that an earlier version of Aqueduct put tokens on every Treasure pile, like Defiled Shrine puts tokens on most Action piles.

Bingo.
Also this wording is simpler.

eHalcyon is talking about the FAQ, not the wording on the card.
I see. The FAQ answers a real question that wouldn't matter with existing cards (and I wouldn't expect more VP tokens any time soon); I try to prune those these days but it's technically correct, Futurama quote.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #148 on: June 07, 2016, 04:50:34 pm »
+1

I'm not sure I get how D(et)onate works. "After your turn", that means after discarding everything from play, right? But is it before or after drawing 5 cards? And how do you "shuffle your hand into your deck", when everything is already in your hand?
It happens after clean-up; you already have a hand of 5 cards for next turn (that you won't keep because you Donated). "Shuffle your hand into your deck," with no deck, means your shuffled hand becomes your deck.
Logged

dbclick

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • Shuffle iT Username: dbclick
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #149 on: June 07, 2016, 04:58:28 pm »
0

Attempted a proxy game with Mountain Pass and Tax and this question came up (as it could have changed the outcome):

If the first Province gained is is on the same turn that triggers the end condition (e.g. 3 pile), does the Mountain Pass bidding still happen or not? (the base rules say to end the game, but the Mountain Pass says to do the bidding after that turn - which rule overrules?)

Someone asked if Donate would still happen if you bought it when piling out the game, and Donald said no. Also, if you pile out the game in the process of trashing cards to Donate (e.g. Hunting Grounds or Catacombs), the end condition is not checked until the end of the next turn, so the game continues until at least then.

Makes sense. Posted it on the wiki.
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #150 on: June 07, 2016, 05:24:52 pm »
0

I guess we also have Sacrifice, but man, if that were the only source of Village on the board, that would probably be a hard engine to pull off.
On the plus side, the combination of Sacrifice and Fortress would be pretty nifty!
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #151 on: June 07, 2016, 05:29:34 pm »
+1

If the first Province gained is is on the same turn that triggers the end condition (e.g. 3 pile), does the Mountain Pass bidding still happen or not? (the base rules say to end the game, but the Mountain Pass says to do the bidding after that turn - which rule overrules?)
Look at the rules carefully. The original Dominion rulebook says "The game ends at the end of any player's turn when...".

And "Mountain Pass" happens "after that turn".

After that turn is later than at the end of it. The game ends before Mountain Pass has time to trigger.

(And, when you think about it, this is likely why Mountain Pass was worded in such a way. Otherwise, the person to the left of the current player just bids <40> and gets 8VP for free.)
Logged

dbclick

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • Shuffle iT Username: dbclick
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #152 on: June 07, 2016, 05:37:39 pm »
+1

(And, when you think about it, this is likely why Mountain Pass was worded in such a way. Otherwise, the person to the left of the current player just bids <40> and gets 8VP for free.)

That's precisely why we had the question when playing the game.

Also, I believe it's worded to trigger between turns so that each player is free to make their own choice during the bidding. Otherwise, when possessing you I just have you pass on your bid and I take the +8VP for 1 Debt in a 2 player game.
Logged

DLloyd09

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: +46
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #153 on: June 07, 2016, 06:13:57 pm »
+7

Did anyone else notice that on the second page of the rulebook it says (emphasis mine):

Dominion: Empires is an expansion, and cannot be played by itself; to play with it, you need Dominion or the first edition of Intrigue, as both provide the Basic cards as well as the full rules for setup and game play.

Seems to suggest that when the next printing of Intrigue occurs it may just be a regular expansion and not a standalone set.
Logged

Erick648

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 115
  • Respect: +370
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #154 on: June 07, 2016, 07:02:39 pm »
0

If the first Province gained is is on the same turn that triggers the end condition (e.g. 3 pile), does the Mountain Pass bidding still happen or not? (the base rules say to end the game, but the Mountain Pass says to do the bidding after that turn - which rule overrules?)
Look at the rules carefully. The original Dominion rulebook says "The game ends at the end of any player's turn when...".

And "Mountain Pass" happens "after that turn".

After that turn is later than at the end of it. The game ends before Mountain Pass has time to trigger.

(And, when you think about it, this is likely why Mountain Pass was worded in such a way. Otherwise, the person to the left of the current player just bids <40> and gets 8VP for free.)
By analogy, Caravan says to draw a card at the start of your next turn, but if the game ends before your next turn, you don't get to draw a card.  Likewise, if you buy Mission and the last Province, you don't get a Mission turn.  Or if your opponent plays an attack and you set aside Horse Traders, but your opponent then buys the last Province, you don't get to return Horse Traders to your hand or draw a card from it.

In short, it's entirely possible to trigger an effect, but then end the game before that effect can be carried out.  Mountain Pass is no exception.
Logged
Duplicate duplicates Duplicates duplicate Duplicates duplicate.

Rene Descartes taught me to believe in myself.

J Reggie

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 633
  • Shuffle iT Username: J Reggie
  • Respect: +971
    • View Profile
    • Jeff Rosenthal Music
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #155 on: June 07, 2016, 07:13:54 pm »
+1

Did anyone else notice that on the second page of the rulebook it says (emphasis mine):

Dominion: Empires is an expansion, and cannot be played by itself; to play with it, you need Dominion or the first edition of Intrigue, as both provide the Basic cards as well as the full rules for setup and game play.

Seems to suggest that when the next printing of Intrigue occurs it may just be a regular expansion and not a standalone set.

Good find! For me Intrigue is already just an expansion; I took the base cards out and put them in Hinterlands.

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #156 on: June 07, 2016, 07:15:28 pm »
0

Seems to suggest that when the next printing of Intrigue occurs it may just be a regular expansion and not a standalone set.
...and therefore also not a way to be able to play with 5-6 players?

I can't pretend I've done that often, but when you need to, you need to. And you can have two games of Dominion going on at once, of course.
Logged

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #157 on: June 07, 2016, 08:01:02 pm »
+5

Seems to suggest that when the next printing of Intrigue occurs it may just be a regular expansion and not a standalone set.
...and therefore also not a way to be able to play with 5-6 players?

I can't pretend I've done that often, but when you need to, you need to. And you can have two games of Dominion going on at once, of course.

http://riograndegames.com/Game/419-Dominion-Base-cards

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #158 on: June 07, 2016, 08:31:34 pm »
0

Well, yes. But you'd want all the basic Treasures and Victories to match... surely?

Then again, maybe the main game is going to get the refreshed base cards artwork sometime.
Logged

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #159 on: June 07, 2016, 09:47:18 pm »
0

Did anyone else notice that on the second page of the rulebook it says (emphasis mine):

Dominion: Empires is an expansion, and cannot be played by itself; to play with it, you need Dominion or the first edition of Intrigue, as both provide the Basic cards as well as the full rules for setup and game play.

Seems to suggest that when the next printing of Intrigue occurs it may just be a regular expansion and not a standalone set.

I noticed that as well and was not sure what to make of it
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #160 on: June 07, 2016, 10:15:44 pm »
0

They sell the Dominion Base cards alone now, so I would imagine they're removing the base cards from Intrigue to cut costs or something.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

Moneymodel

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
  • Respect: +129
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #161 on: June 07, 2016, 11:00:52 pm »
0

(And, when you think about it, this is likely why Mountain Pass was worded in such a way. Otherwise, the person to the left of the current player just bids <40> and gets 8VP for free.)

Err, I don't believe that's true. Pulling from the rulebook: The 8VP is only given out to the highest bidder. This doesn't happen if there is no highest bidder. The other player(s) simply have to bid <40> as well.
Logged

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #162 on: June 07, 2016, 11:10:00 pm »
+3

(And, when you think about it, this is likely why Mountain Pass was worded in such a way. Otherwise, the person to the left of the current player just bids <40> and gets 8VP for free.)

Err, I don't believe that's true. Pulling from the rulebook: The 8VP is only given out to the highest bidder. This doesn't happen if there is no highest bidder. The other player(s) simply have to bid <40> as well.
"Each bid can be a pass, or a higher bid than the previous bid."

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."
Logged

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 877
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
  • lockjaw
  • Respect: +1237
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #163 on: June 07, 2016, 11:27:44 pm »
+6

It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."
"oh yeah? well i bid infinity plus two"
"my dad can beat up your dad"
Logged
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'
6-8
he/him
beloved my john, i'll carry on

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #164 on: June 07, 2016, 11:58:32 pm »
0

It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."
"oh yeah? well i bid infinity plus two"
"my dad can beat up your dad"

"Hah!  I got those 8!"
"Yeah, well, good luck buying anything for the rest of the game."
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

mail-mi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1066
  • Come play some Forum Mafia with us!
  • Respect: +1122
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #165 on: June 08, 2016, 12:16:04 am »
0

Question on Triumphal Arch: If you only have 1 kind of action card in your deck, do you still get a vp award or not?
Logged
I currently imagine mail-mi wearing a dark trenchcoat and a bowler hat, hunched over a bit, toothpick in his mouth, holding a gun in his pocket.  One bead of sweat trickling down his nose.

"Behold, your sins are forgiven you; you are clean before me; therefore, lift up your heads and rejoice." - Doctrine and Covenants 110:5

LibraryAdventurer

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1086
  • Shuffle iT Username: LibraryAdventurer
  • Respect: +842
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #166 on: June 08, 2016, 02:02:33 am »
+3

It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."
"oh yeah? well i bid infinity plus two"
"my dad can beat up your dad"

"Hah!  I got those 8!"
"Yeah, well, good luck buying anything for the rest of the game."
"I can draw my deck which includes two Expands and three Ironworks. I don't need to buy anything for the rest of the game."

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7044
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9264
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #167 on: June 08, 2016, 02:23:31 am »
0

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #168 on: June 08, 2016, 02:53:17 am »
+10

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?
It's yuck. The problem is it's yuck. Yuck ptui.

Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4733
  • Respect: +3320
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #169 on: June 08, 2016, 03:20:07 am »
0

Well, there's a way to create an infinite amount of $, right?
Surely CelestialChameleon or someone else figured this out.

And we don't want to go through the whole ordeal of someone actually trying to do it after bidding 99999999999D
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

SCSN

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2226
  • Respect: +7117
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #170 on: June 08, 2016, 03:25:01 am »
+22

Well, there's a way to create an infinite amount of $, right?
Surely CelestialChameleon or someone else figured this out.

Empires makes this easy: just create half of the infinite amount and then double it with Fortune.
Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4733
  • Respect: +3320
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #171 on: June 08, 2016, 03:31:50 am »
0

Or I could just play an infinite amount of Coppers with Black Market and just play a single Bank during my buy phase.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

wachsmuth

  • Apprentice
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 266
  • Respect: +342
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #172 on: June 08, 2016, 05:43:58 am »
+3

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.
Logged

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #173 on: June 08, 2016, 06:29:32 am »
0

In hindsight, I kinda expected there would be more Debt cards and less vp stuff. I'm not complaining, though! :)
Logged

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4733
  • Respect: +3320
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #174 on: June 08, 2016, 08:24:26 am »
+1

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.
Having a bid limit has the upside of making it crystal clear how much to bid to make sure you're winning the bid.
This may prevent analysis paralysis; oh should I bid 13 or 23 or 103? Just bid 40 if you desperately want to win.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Marcory

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 634
  • Respect: +1026
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #175 on: June 08, 2016, 09:26:16 am »
+2

In hindsight, I kinda expected there would be more Debt cards and less vp stuff. I'm not complaining, though! :)

Dark Ages only has 3 Looters and 3 cards that interact with the trash (four if you count Fortress), despite those being major themes of the set; similarly, Prosperity only has 3 VP token cards and four cost cards, so it's not surprising that Debt is as infrequent as it is in Empires.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2016, 09:28:20 am by Marcory »
Logged

DLloyd09

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: +46
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #176 on: June 08, 2016, 09:39:47 am »
0

In hindsight, I kinda expected there would be more Debt cards and less vp stuff. I'm not complaining, though! :)

I hope if we're lucky enough to get more expansions it's a mechanic that gets further explored. I know that's less likely given the physical requirement of the tokens, but I feel like there's a lot more that can be done there!
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #177 on: June 08, 2016, 10:20:10 am »
+1

In hindsight, I kinda expected there would be more Debt cards
I think what surprises me most in that respect is that there aren't any cards you can buy at strange times, given that the buy-now-pay-later mechanic supports this.

There isn't a debt-cost Reaction you can buy when you're attacked, for example.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #178 on: June 08, 2016, 10:22:39 am »
0

How does salt the earth interact with rebuild?
Logged

AdrianHealey

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Respect: +769
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #179 on: June 08, 2016, 10:23:51 am »
0

Those are some holymotherholyfuck cards in that expansion :D
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #180 on: June 08, 2016, 10:53:51 am »
+1

How does salt the earth interact with rebuild?
What am I missing? So far as I can see, the answer is "it doesn't".

Well, except that VIctory cards that have been trashed by Salt the Earth can't be gained by Rebuild and vice-versa, I guess.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #181 on: June 08, 2016, 10:55:33 am »
+2

How does salt the earth interact with rebuild?
What am I missing? So far as I can see, the answer is "it doesn't".

Well, except that VIctory cards that have been trashed by Salt the Earth can't be gained by Rebuild and vice-versa, I guess.
This is a strategy question not a rules question.
In a rebuild mirror do you want to skip naming duchies so you can just salt away the provinces?
Does salt the earth help or hurt a rebuild player in a non-performing?
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #182 on: June 08, 2016, 10:56:50 am »
0

How does salt the earth interact with rebuild?
What am I missing? So far as I can see, the answer is "it doesn't".

Well, except that VIctory cards that have been trashed by Salt the Earth can't be gained by Rebuild and vice-versa, I guess.
This is a strategy question not a rules question.
In a rebuild mirror do you want to skip naming duchies so you can just salt away the provinces?
Does salt the earth help or hurt a rebuild player in a non-performing?

I think we should ask Mic Qsenoch or Geronimoo. They know all about that kind of stuff.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

dbclick

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • Shuffle iT Username: dbclick
  • Respect: +37
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #183 on: June 08, 2016, 11:04:49 am »
0

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.
Having a bid limit has the upside of making it crystal clear how much to bid to make sure you're winning the bid.
This may prevent analysis paralysis; oh should I bid 13 or 23 or 103? Just bid 40 if you desperately want to win.


As long as you have a deck set up to where you don't need to buy anything the rest of the game, such as with Remodel-family cards, gainers etc., the correct bid would be infinite, since you don't care how much debt you have. Having a limit of 40 is nice since you can just say "I win the bid" and gloat as you take the whole pile of debt tokens (since there are 40 of those) rather than argue about the semantics of number theory and writing down that you have a googolplex+2 debt tokens or some such (yuck ptui, indeed).
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #184 on: June 08, 2016, 11:05:17 am »
0

Empires is the most biggest expansion for Gold circlejerking I've ever seen.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

Watno

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2688
  • Shuffle iT Username: Watno
  • Respect: +2867
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #185 on: June 08, 2016, 11:07:38 am »
+2

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.
Having a bid limit has the upside of making it crystal clear how much to bid to make sure you're winning the bid.
This may prevent analysis paralysis; oh should I bid 13 or 23 or 103? Just bid 40 if you desperately want to win.


As long as you have a deck set up to where you don't need to buy anything the rest of the game, such as with Remodel-family cards, gainers etc., the correct bid would be infinite, since you don't care how much debt you have. Having a limit of 40 is nice since you can just say "I win the bid" and gloat as you take the whole pile of debt tokens (since there are 40 of those) rather than argue about the semantics of number theory and writing down that you have a googolplex+2 debt tokens or some such (yuck ptui, indeed).

More imprtantly, without the limit, there would be no bid that lets you win guaranteed as the first player bidding, since the second player could simply bid one more.
Logged

Chris is me

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2462
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3032
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #186 on: June 08, 2016, 11:14:35 am »
+1

How does salt the earth interact with rebuild?
What am I missing? So far as I can see, the answer is "it doesn't".

Well, except that VIctory cards that have been trashed by Salt the Earth can't be gained by Rebuild and vice-versa, I guess.

"It doesn't interact with Rebuild, except for the part where it trashes the cards Rebuild needs in order to work".

Salt the Earth tilts a Rebuild board dramatically. The Engine player can try to burn Duchies to stop the Rebuild player from amassing more than 3. The Rebuild player can mill a Province every turn to end the game faster in a non mirror. It will be bought frequently on Rebuild boards for sure.
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

they/them

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #187 on: June 08, 2016, 11:30:57 am »
+4

I don't see how an engine player can burn Duchies? Which engine can buy this five times before the Rebuild player aquires four duchies? To me, it is cyrstal clear that this helps the Rebuild player. Killing availalbe VP is all the rebuild player does anyway, no? This just makes it way easier to end it before the engine player can buy enough provinces.
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #188 on: June 08, 2016, 11:53:42 am »
0

Yeah, it's probably very relevant because it's a very good option for 4 coins hands in a Rebuild deck (both vs engine and in mirror - trashing Provinces against engine and mostly Duchies against Rebuild).
I'm no expert, but I don't see it countering Rebuild. Even opening with Salt won't stop your opponent racking in a few Provinces while salting the rest.
Logged

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #189 on: June 08, 2016, 11:57:18 am »
+6

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.
Having a bid limit has the upside of making it crystal clear how much to bid to make sure you're winning the bid.
This may prevent analysis paralysis; oh should I bid 13 or 23 or 103? Just bid 40 if you desperately want to win.

Having a limit also fundamentally changes the way the Landmark interacts with being the first person to gain a Province. If it had no limit, then the first person to gain a Province could always get the 8 vp; as long as he doesn't need to buy anything for the rest of the game (quite possible in various engine types). With the limit, the person to the left of the first person to gain a Province can always get the 8 vp if he wants.

I'm definitely with Donald, not having a limit would be very yucky; aside from the massive AP involved in engines where you can generate > 40 coins per turn, it leads to "who can name the biggest number" contests in some situations.
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

pacovf

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3297
  • Multiediting poster
  • Respect: +3638
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #190 on: June 08, 2016, 12:25:46 pm »
+5

The limit was added so that people would stop bidding yo' mama.
Logged
pacovf has a neopets account.  It has 999 hours logged.  All his neopets are named "Jessica".  I guess that must be his ex.

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1059
  • They can't all be the best personal text ever
  • Respect: +1932
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #191 on: June 08, 2016, 12:58:11 pm »
+5

The limit was added so that people would stop bidding yo' mama.

Yo mama's so fat that when you try to trash her with catapult, the catapult gets trashed instead.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

twitch.tv/a_drowned_kernel

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #192 on: June 08, 2016, 01:03:22 pm »
0

The limit was added so that people would stop bidding yo' mama.

Yo mama's so fat that when you try to trash her with catapult, the catapult gets trashed instead. your opponent has to discard down to 1 and gain 2 curses!

Needs work, good idea though.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7044
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9264
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #193 on: June 08, 2016, 01:11:30 pm »
+1

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.

Well, I think that bidding infinity ought to be just as valid as bidding Graham's number.

And of course, the correct response to a bid of Graham's number is Busy Beaver function of (Graham's number).
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6820
  • Respect: +7665
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #194 on: June 08, 2016, 01:57:41 pm »
+1

Mountain Pass is between turns because of Possession. It has a maximum bid because the "correct" bid might be "unbounded."

I don't understand why that's a problem.  Tokens aren't physically limited, and frankly "you can't buy anything for the remainder of the game" is as easy to keep track of as 40 debt tokens is, isn't it?

I guess the difficult case is where the "correct" answer is somewhere in the 100s or 1000s and you don't want to wait for someone to make those calculations.

There can be a case where the correct bid is basically infinite. Having a bid limit seems a lot more elegant than Player 1 bidding Graham's Number, and player 2 bidding Graham's Number +1.

Well, I think that bidding infinity ought to be just as valid as bidding Graham's number.

And of course, the correct response to a bid of Graham's number is Busy Beaver function of (Graham's number).

No, bidding infinity specifically breaks the rule of "a bid is in the form of a number".
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #195 on: June 08, 2016, 02:13:53 pm »
0

<pedant>Not so! There are number systems that include infinities.</pedant>
Logged

ephesos

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 310
  • Shuffle iT Username: Ephesos
  • Respect: +262
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #196 on: June 08, 2016, 02:52:26 pm »
+4

<pedant>Not so! There are number systems that include infinities.</pedant>

Yes, there are, and fortunately we don't use any of them when playing Dominion.
Logged

Orange

  • 2012 WBC Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 251
  • Shuffle iT Username: Orange
  • 2012 WBC Champion
  • Respect: +252
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #197 on: June 08, 2016, 02:53:51 pm »
+1

40 is the buy-it-now price.  You may be willing to pay 40 or even more, but if somebody else pays the buy-it-now price, well, you are out of luck.
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #198 on: June 08, 2016, 03:03:35 pm »
0

<pedant>Not so! There are number systems that include infinities.</pedant>

Yes, there are, and fortunately we don't use any of them when playing Dominion.

But does the rulebook specify which number system we're using? ;)

Infinity is too expensive anyway. Infinity -  1, that's where it's at.
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #199 on: June 08, 2016, 04:03:48 pm »
0

But does the rulebook specify which number system we're using? ;)
It doesn't even specify bids have to be integers. But I don't think anything breaks if someone bids π? Just give them π debt tokens (improvise) so they're still in debt when they've paid $3 and lose the over-repayment when they pay $4, so they might as well have bid 4 in the first place rather than playing silly buggers?
Logged

461.weavile

  • Salvager
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
  • Respect: +51
    • View Profile
    • Itemfinder RPG
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #200 on: June 08, 2016, 06:21:19 pm »
+1

The even better Donate/Windfall

Turn 1:
Play 5 Copper, Borrow, buy Donate, pay off 6 Debt.
Draw 4 cards.
Put your Deck and discard into your hand, Trash 3 Estate/2 Copper, Discard 5 Copper, Draw 5 Copper.

Turn 2:
Play 5 Copper, Spend Baker Token, Borrow, Pay off 2 Debt, Buy Windfall, Gain 3 Golds.

This assumes you ignore the recommendation of max. 2 Events+Landmarks. Then you need the luck to deal out 4 particular cards within the first 13 or so, and you need to draw 5 Coppers, but a lot of hypothetical situations assume that. The thing that really strikes me as weird is ignoring the official recommendation.

I guess it really doesn't matter, but I wasn't sure it was a useful example... whatever.
Logged
Warlords and Wizards is my favorite expansion.

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #201 on: June 08, 2016, 06:30:52 pm »
+1

The even better Donate/Windfall

Turn 1:
Play 5 Copper, Borrow, buy Donate, pay off 6 Debt.
Draw 4 cards.
Put your Deck and discard into your hand, Trash 3 Estate/2 Copper, Discard 5 Copper, Draw 5 Copper.

Turn 2:
Play 5 Copper, Spend Baker Token, Borrow, Pay off 2 Debt, Buy Windfall, Gain 3 Golds.

This assumes you ignore the recommendation of max. 2 Events+Landmarks. Then you need the luck to deal out 4 particular cards within the first 13 or so, and you need to draw 5 Coppers, but a lot of hypothetical situations assume that. The thing that really strikes me as weird is ignoring the official recommendation.

I guess it really doesn't matter, but I wasn't sure it was a useful example... whatever.

I had no intentions of being useful here. I just realized you could get Windfall turn 2, and thought it was cool.

singletee

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 843
  • Shuffle iT Username: singletee
  • Gold, Silver, Copper, Let's Jam!
  • Respect: +1455
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #202 on: June 08, 2016, 09:32:51 pm »
+1

Poor House is also good with Donate:
T1 Poor House
T2 Donate everything but PH
T3 Pay off debt
T4 Pay off debt if any left and start buying

If you have a splitter:
T1/T2 Poor House/splitter
T3 Poor House
T4 Donate all starting cards
T5 Play 2 Poor Houses, pay off debt and start buying
This takes one more turn but you have an additional Poor House and splitter.

This has the advantage of not clogging up your deck with yucky Golds.

ConMan

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1256
  • Respect: +1477
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #203 on: June 08, 2016, 10:38:27 pm »
+1

If you want to start getting specific, how about a Shelters game with Poor House, Donate and Travelling Fair?

T1: Travelling Fair/PH/PH
T2: Donate everything except PH and Necropolis
T3: Play Necro/PH/PH, pay off debt
T4: Debt? What debt?
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #204 on: June 08, 2016, 10:46:07 pm »
+1

If you want to start getting specific, how about a Shelters game with Poor House, Donate and Travelling Fair?

T1: Travelling Fair/PH/PH
T2: Donate everything except PH and Necropolis
T3: Play Necro/PH/PH, pay off debt
T4: Debt? What debt?

If you draw Necropolis on turn 2, you can pay off your debt that turn.
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #205 on: June 08, 2016, 10:53:10 pm »
0

If you want to start getting specific, how about a Shelters game with Poor House, Donate and Travelling Fair?

T1: Travelling Fair/PH/PH
T2: Donate everything except PH and Necropolis
T3: Play Necro/PH/PH, pay off debt
T4: Debt? What debt?

If you draw Necropolis on turn 2, you can pay off your debt that turn.

You'd also have to not draw any Copper on turn 2, which is possible but not guaranteed.
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1703
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +1897
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #206 on: June 08, 2016, 11:13:45 pm »
0

If you want to start getting specific, how about a Shelters game with Poor House, Donate and Travelling Fair?

T1: Travelling Fair/PH/PH
T2: Donate everything except PH and Necropolis
T3: Play Necro/PH/PH, pay off debt
T4: Debt? What debt?

If you draw Necropolis on turn 2, you can pay off your debt that turn.

You'd also have to not draw any Copper on turn 2, which is possible but not guaranteed.

Right of course, it's pretty unlikely.
Logged

ConMan

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1256
  • Respect: +1477
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #207 on: June 09, 2016, 12:50:43 am »
+2

We're talking fairly specific scenarios in the first place (two Events plus a Kingdom card plus a Shelters game plus opening minimum 4 coppers), why not assume everything else is perfectly arranged?
Logged

pacovf

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3297
  • Multiediting poster
  • Respect: +3638
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #208 on: June 09, 2016, 01:03:04 am »
0

This was probably answered before for Forge, but can I:

-I buy donate.
-I put all cards in hand.
-I have (among other things) two rats and a market square in hand.
-I trash a rat, and discard market square to gain a gold.
-I draw a card from trashing rat, so I get market square back in hand.
-I trash the other rat.
-I reveal the same market square again to gain another gold.

Can I do this?

(I am wondering if there is any way to exploit putting your whole deck in hand, even though it's not your turn)
Logged
pacovf has a neopets account.  It has 999 hours logged.  All his neopets are named "Jessica".  I guess that must be his ex.

AJD

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2863
  • Shuffle iT Username: AJD
  • Respect: +3567
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #209 on: June 09, 2016, 01:19:19 am »
+1

This was probably answered before for Forge, but can I:

-I buy donate.
-I put all cards in hand.
-I have (among other things) two rats and a market square in hand.
-I trash a rat, and discard market square to gain a gold.
-I draw a card from trashing rat, so I get market square back in hand.
-I trash the other rat.
-I reveal the same market square again to gain another gold.

Can I do this?

(I am wondering if there is any way to exploit putting your whole deck in hand, even though it's not your turn)

So, you can't do what you describe, because you trash all cards simultaneously. You can't trash one Rats, discard Market Square for that, and then trash the other Rats.

However, you can:

Trash two Rats,
discard one Market Square to gain one Gold,
+2 cards (from the Rats),
discard the same Market Square again.
Logged

scott_pilgrim

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 994
  • Respect: +1951
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #210 on: June 09, 2016, 03:03:11 am »
+1

I think you can do what pacovf described, it's just misleading because the way he said it made it sound like the trashes are not simultaneous.

You trash two Rats.
Reveal and discard MS to gain Gold.
Resolve the on-trash of Rat #1, draw one card (MS).
Reveal and discard MS to gain Gold.
Resolve the on-trash of Rat #2, draw one card (Gold).

In fact, if you use Cultist, I think you can reveal the same MS three times for only two cards, which seems extra weird.

Trash two Cultists.
Reveal and discard MS to gain Gold.
Resolve the on-trash of Cultist #1, drawing Gold and MS.
Reveal and discard MS to gain Gold.
Resolve the on-trash of Cultist #2, drawing Gold and MS.
Reveal and discard MS to gain Gold.

You could continue doing this as many times as you like, so that if you trash n Cultists, one MS will give you n+1 Golds.
Logged

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #211 on: June 09, 2016, 10:43:07 am »
+4

Open Banquet, gain Cache.

Fountain/Gardens game.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #212 on: June 09, 2016, 12:11:10 pm »
0

Once you have $8 to spend: Travelling Fair, Banquet gaining Cache, Banquet gaining Cache, top-deck both Caches and two of the Coppers. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Logged

Limetime

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1232
  • Shuffle iT Username: limetime
  • Respect: +1165
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #213 on: June 09, 2016, 12:13:28 pm »
+1

Open Banquet, gain Cache.

Fountain/Gardens game.
Let me guess: wall was in the kingdom.
Logged

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #214 on: June 09, 2016, 12:43:48 pm »
0

And here the mandatory art commentary:

It might be an effect of the low resolution, but Charm must really be magic. How else could it be floating a few centimeters above the table? It must also have the power of not casting shadows (a power it shares with the candles).
Some of the worst of Dominion.
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #215 on: June 09, 2016, 12:47:10 pm »
+3

I don't want to give a commentary on art until I see the full resolution. Some of the good art shown in the previews looks bad in the low res.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

trivialknot

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 565
  • Respect: +904
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #216 on: June 09, 2016, 01:00:50 pm »
+8

The blurry aesthetic is cool, really draws the set together, like the bald theme in Guilds.
Logged

bedlam

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 124
  • Respect: +71
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #217 on: June 09, 2016, 08:03:55 pm »
+2

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?
Logged

J Reggie

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 633
  • Shuffle iT Username: J Reggie
  • Respect: +971
    • View Profile
    • Jeff Rosenthal Music
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #218 on: June 09, 2016, 08:07:07 pm »
0

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?

Probably so that no card notes would span two pages.

Donald X.

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4804
  • Respect: +19565
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #219 on: June 09, 2016, 08:15:50 pm »
+3

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?

Probably so that no card notes would span two pages.
But then why is it in the wrong place on the inlay?

We didn't think that art looked "Old."
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #220 on: June 10, 2016, 12:23:10 am »
+1

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.

Dominion isn't history though. There certainly weren't any Enchantresses or Ghost Ships or Scrying Pools or real Alchemists in historical times; so why not make the world a little better and more equal rather than constraining ourselves to the sexism of the past?

That people see the word "Engineer" and think "male" is more than enough reason to not do that, really. That gender conception exists TODAY.

Most engineers are male. Assuming an engineer is a male isn't sexism, it's reality. When more women complete STEM in college (which is happening now) that stigma will soon vanish. Women already outnumber men in college, and that number is growing.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

J Reggie

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 633
  • Shuffle iT Username: J Reggie
  • Respect: +971
    • View Profile
    • Jeff Rosenthal Music
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #221 on: June 10, 2016, 12:44:12 am »
+4

Okay! Time for a lengthy post on my thoughts:
Engineer: The on play effect seems fine, I'll probably trash it after a few plays. The 4 debt cost is what intrigues me. It's so small it seems like it is essentially a 4 costing card. My guess is the debt cost is so it can't gain itself. Don't know why that would be too good though. I do appreciate having a wider variety of debt costs. The art seems decent, especially for a first time artist. Interesting that it features a woman, don't know what to think about that. There do need to be more cards with women but I would have put a dude on engineer.

That is the reason why there is a woman on it!
There weren't very many female engineers/inventors in the Roman times. A male would have been more historically accurate, but compared to steward it's not that bad.

Dominion isn't history though. There certainly weren't any Enchantresses or Ghost Ships or Scrying Pools or real Alchemists in historical times; so why not make the world a little better and more equal rather than constraining ourselves to the sexism of the past?

That people see the word "Engineer" and think "male" is more than enough reason to not do that, really. That gender conception exists TODAY.

Most engineers are male. Assuming an engineer is a male isn't sexism, it's reality. When more women complete STEM in college (which is happening now) that stigma will soon vanish. Women already outnumber men in college, and that number is growing.

If we're discussing this could we take it to rsp? I don't want this thread to get closed.

Elanchana

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 697
  • Princess of Derpminion
  • Respect: +1005
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #222 on: June 10, 2016, 02:53:32 am »
+2

I came up with a killer combo the other day (that everyone probably saw already but eh). Advance+Fortress with extra buys? Borked?
Logged
Sure it's just a game. The same way that your best friend in the whole world is "just a friend".

TwitchYouTubeMusic

!!CHANGED MY USERNAME ON 2.0!!

Co0kieL0rd

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 729
  • Respect: +839
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #223 on: June 10, 2016, 07:08:22 am »
+1

The blurry aesthetic is cool, really draws the set together, like the bald theme in Guilds.

I think that's just because of poor scan quality.
Logged
Check out my fan cards!
Dominion: Seasons - a small set Asper and I made that revolves around a unique and original mechanic
Roots and Renewal - this set is about interacting with the Supply and manipulating your opening turns
Flash cards - trying out a new concept

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #224 on: June 10, 2016, 08:19:13 am »
0

The blurry aesthetic is cool, really draws the set together, like the bald theme in Guilds.

I think that's just because of poor scan quality.

There haven't been any scans yet (my copy is still en route).  These images are all taken from the rulebook online.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #225 on: June 10, 2016, 10:21:49 am »
0

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?

Probably so that no card notes would span two pages.
But then why is it in the wrong place on the inlay?

We didn't think that art looked "Old."

Well, it could have explained why he's wearing glasses.
Logged

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #226 on: June 10, 2016, 11:26:55 am »
0

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?

Probably so that no card notes would span two pages.
But then why is it in the wrong place on the inlay?

We didn't think that art looked "Old."

Well, it could have explained why he's wearing glasses.

I assumed it was because he was from the future, or had modern glasses delivered to him via time travel.
Logged

Asper

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4337
  • Respect: +4736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #227 on: June 10, 2016, 11:53:11 am »
0

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?

Probably so that no card notes would span two pages.
But then why is it in the wrong place on the inlay?

We didn't think that art looked "Old."

Well, it could have explained why he's wearing glasses.

I assumed it was because he was from the future, or had modern glasses delivered to him via time travel.

I assumed he was the time traveller, on a quest to deliver glasses from the late 13th century to ancient rome.

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #228 on: June 10, 2016, 12:57:00 pm »
+2

My question is, if all the cards are listed in alphabetical order, then why is Royal Blacksmith found where it is?

Probably so that no card notes would span two pages.
But then why is it in the wrong place on the inlay?

We didn't think that art looked "Old."

Well, it could have explained why he's wearing glasses.

I assumed it was because he was from the future, or had modern glasses delivered to him via time travel.

It really seems like for this set Alayna Lemmer went "shit, it's almost the deadline uh let me see what I have on file... Yeah, that works!"
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #229 on: June 10, 2016, 04:43:35 pm »
+2

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.
Logged

LastFootnote

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6853
  • Shuffle iT Username: LastFootnote
  • Respect: +9375
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #230 on: June 10, 2016, 04:48:20 pm »
+1

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

???
Logged

JW

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 686
  • Shuffle iT Username: JW
  • Respect: +1211
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #231 on: June 10, 2016, 04:50:30 pm »
0

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.

Edit: As drsteelhammer and Deadlock point out, Possession + strong trashing has the potential to result in stalemates. Donate is similar to Chapel in this regard. Both players will often be aiming for a deck that can't do anything besides play multiple Possessions a turn. So Donate is a problem with Possession in the sense that any strong trashing + Possession is a problem. But blame Possession, not Donate!
« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 05:12:27 pm by JW »
Logged

SuperHans

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
  • Respect: +190
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #232 on: June 10, 2016, 04:56:20 pm »
+1

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.
Good guy possessor. Takes 8 debt tokens and let's me trash whatever cards I want.
Logged

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #233 on: June 10, 2016, 04:57:44 pm »
+2

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.

Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to village-village-possession-possession-possession?
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

SuperHans

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
  • Respect: +190
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #234 on: June 10, 2016, 04:58:34 pm »
0

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.
Good guy possessor. Takes 8 debt tokens and let's me trash whatever cards I want.
Edge case. That's what he wants me to do so that I clean my deck up for him.
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5414
  • Shuffle iT Username: Seprix
  • luck is a glitch
  • Respect: +3344
    • View Profile
    • The Border Village
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #235 on: June 10, 2016, 05:05:07 pm »
+1

I'll say it again: Ban Possession.
Logged
WOWIE I GUESS I HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE
Join Dominion Discord

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #236 on: June 10, 2016, 05:07:41 pm »
+1

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.

Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to village-village-possession-possession-possession?

Yeah... so I am pretty swayed toward the degenerate case here actually. When you can reach a deck that plays more than 1 Possession a turn without falling super far behind, the goal turns into building this up as quickly as possible and then destroying your own economy. You can destroy your own economy instantly with Donate, and leave your deck in debt so your opponent can't use it. If this is mirrored, the game is locked out and you starve to death.


Also... FTFY:
Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to king's court-king's court-possession-possession-possession?

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #237 on: June 10, 2016, 05:10:44 pm »
0

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.

Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to village-village-possession-possession-possession?

That's what I was referring to.
Logged

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #238 on: June 10, 2016, 05:12:21 pm »
+2

The problem is... the opponent doesn't even have to mirror it, he just has to kill all his economy aswell the following turn.
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

JW

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 686
  • Shuffle iT Username: JW
  • Respect: +1211
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #239 on: June 10, 2016, 05:19:37 pm »
0

The problem is... the opponent doesn't even have to mirror it, he just has to kill all his economy as well the following turn.

Anticipating this, the player aiming for the multi-Possession deck might keep a single Gold with Donate. If the opponent isn't mirroring on Possession but trashes all economy/gaining, the Possession player can re-buy Silver, morph into a money deck, and win from there. But if both players build decks that can play multiple Possessions each turn, the game will just end in a stalemate.
Logged

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #240 on: June 10, 2016, 05:28:23 pm »
0

It doesn't necessarily have to stalemate if you can get enough of a lead that your opponent can't win on Estates.  You can just keep $2, and pile Estate/Curse/Copper while periodically donating to make sure your opponent can't score any points with your deck.  To do this you have to also maintain the threat of multi-Possessing them so they can't build back up.

drsteelhammer

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1524
  • Shuffle iT Username: drsteelhammer
  • Respect: +1454
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #241 on: June 10, 2016, 06:43:35 pm »
0

The problem is... the opponent doesn't even have to mirror it, he just has to kill all his economy as well the following turn.

Anticipating this, the player aiming for the multi-Possession deck might keep a single Gold with Donate. If the opponent isn't mirroring on Possession but trashes all economy/gaining, the Possession player can re-buy Silver, morph into a money deck, and win from there. But if both players build decks that can play multiple Possessions each turn, the game will just end in a stalemate.

Oh, I meant that he doesn't have to build up to triple Possession turns, a single one of them is enough. Otherwise the player who donates first can win, you are right.
Logged
Join the Dominion League!

There is no bad shuffle that can not be surmounted by scorn.

Asper

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4337
  • Respect: +4736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #242 on: June 10, 2016, 10:33:52 pm »
0

If i can play several Possessions each turn, and my opponent can so, too, i would consider deliberately going into Debt with Donate. It would set up my deck to be only Possessions for my opponent, and as he uses my deck more than i do, while i mostly play his deck, i am better off being the one who has a debt. So i certainly understand why it would create a stalemate - you can not progress during your turn without helping your opponent more, and stalling makes your position stronger. It's a situation where the one moving first loses, so nobody moves.

Accatitippi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1145
  • Shuffle iT Username: Accatitippi
  • Silver is underraided
  • Respect: +1762
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #243 on: June 11, 2016, 05:12:59 am »
0

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.

Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to village-village-possession-possession-possession?

Yeah... so I am pretty swayed toward the degenerate case here actually. When you can reach a deck that plays more than 1 Possession a turn without falling super far behind, the goal turns into building this up as quickly as possible and then destroying your own economy. You can destroy your own economy instantly with Donate, and leave your deck in debt so your opponent can't use it. If this is mirrored, the game is locked out and you starve to death.


Also... FTFY:
Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to king's court-king's court-possession-possession-possession?

I've thought a bit more about this:

Stalling and Donating all the money is strictly worse than stalling and donating everything but a copper. Your opponent can't do anything with your deck anyway, except buy coppers and curses (and poor houses and Debt stuff), which they would do anyway with their own deck if they kept a copper.

If you are ahead by more than 4-8 points, keeping a Silver's worth probably makes you win. (you slowly win by three-piling and Donating Curses, Coppers and Estates, or three 2-4$ cards as long as the extra economy needed doesn't give your opponent access to more points than just the Estate pile). If you don't have that point advantage, your opponent will probably use your not-completely-dead deck to gain more points than you do and you'll lose, so it's in your best interest to starve to death (nobody likes losing).

Supposing that the players are playing to win, and supposing that starving to death counts at best as a draw, it would be in their interest not to build a stall-inducing Possession deck unless they are going to win after most Estates go to their opponent.

So, I don't see the stall happening a lot of the time. You don't often have both a point lead and the time to buy Possessions while defending that lead.

(the long and drawn-out endgame of such a scenario might offer some small chances for the losing player to build up a sloggish deck with coppers silvers and Estates and lucksnipe a couple of Duchies while their opponent does not. Thus, they unfortunately might not want to resign right away)
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9136
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #244 on: June 11, 2016, 10:25:03 am »
+1

Oh my. Surely somebody has said it already, but I just realized: Possession+Donate is going to be so degenerate.

It shouldn't be a problem. Donate takes place after your turn, so if the Possessor has the Possessed player buy Donate, the Possessed player gets to decide what to trash.

Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to village-village-possession-possession-possession?

Yeah... so I am pretty swayed toward the degenerate case here actually. When you can reach a deck that plays more than 1 Possession a turn without falling super far behind, the goal turns into building this up as quickly as possible and then destroying your own economy. You can destroy your own economy instantly with Donate, and leave your deck in debt so your opponent can't use it. If this is mirrored, the game is locked out and you starve to death.


Also... FTFY:
Will it be a problem if I donate and trash my deck down to king's court-king's court-possession-possession-possession?

I've thought a bit more about this:

Stalling and Donating all the money is strictly worse than stalling and donating everything but a copper. Your opponent can't do anything with your deck anyway, except buy coppers and curses (and poor houses and Debt stuff), which they would do anyway with their own deck if they kept a copper.

If you are ahead by more than 4-8 points, keeping a Silver's worth probably makes you win. (you slowly win by three-piling and Donating Curses, Coppers and Estates, or three 2-4$ cards as long as the extra economy needed doesn't give your opponent access to more points than just the Estate pile). If you don't have that point advantage, your opponent will probably use your not-completely-dead deck to gain more points than you do and you'll lose, so it's in your best interest to starve to death (nobody likes losing).

Supposing that the players are playing to win, and supposing that starving to death counts at best as a draw, it would be in their interest not to build a stall-inducing Possession deck unless they are going to win after most Estates go to their opponent.

So, I don't see the stall happening a lot of the time. You don't often have both a point lead and the time to buy Possessions while defending that lead.

(the long and drawn-out endgame of such a scenario might offer some small chances for the losing player to build up a sloggish deck with coppers silvers and Estates and lucksnipe a couple of Duchies while their opponent does not. Thus, they unfortunately might not want to resign right away)

It sounds to me like you're describing the prisoner's dilemma but assuming that players will cooperate for mutual benefit.  Your options are to either build a Possession-centric deck or not. If both players do it, they probably starve to death and that's bad, so neither play should do it. If neither player does, then the game can proceed as normal and everybody wins (especially the player who actually wins). The problem here is that if only one player goes for the Possession-heavy strategy, that player will win. So then your options end up being "skip Possession, either have a chance at winning or lose badly" vs. "go for Possession, either draw or win easily". Guess which one players choose?
Logged

Deadlock39

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1722
  • Respect: +1736
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #245 on: June 11, 2016, 10:54:58 am »
0

Quote
Possession/Donate stuff

Just want to add that being able to play tons of Possessions, and then destroy your economy isn't a new stalemate inducing condition. Donate just makes the second part so much easier/faster.

With slower trashers, usually someone gets lucky and scores some points to stop the stalemate before it can happen.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 10:56:37 am by Deadlock39 »
Logged

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #246 on: June 11, 2016, 11:25:06 am »
+15

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

quazerflame

  • Pearl Diver
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +20
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #247 on: June 11, 2016, 10:45:29 pm »
+3

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.

Awesome, can't wait to see the completed thing. This is including the split card randomizers?

Also, my first post in the forum. Hi everyone.
Logged

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #248 on: June 11, 2016, 10:58:13 pm »
0

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.

Awesome, can't wait to see the completed thing. This is including the split card randomizers?

Yep!  Those randomizers are lowest priority right now, though.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

quazerflame

  • Pearl Diver
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +20
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #249 on: June 11, 2016, 11:01:51 pm »
0

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.

Awesome, can't wait to see the completed thing. This is including the split card randomizers?

Yep!  Those randomizers are lowest priority right now, though.

Of course, gotta have the actual cards that are played with looking nice first. Any idea how they'll be made selectable in the wiki?

I mean, Knights, Ruins and Castles have names of their own that you click on, but the naming system for the other multicard piles feature Card1/Card2 as their names.
Logged

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #250 on: June 11, 2016, 11:11:47 pm »
+2

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.

Awesome, can't wait to see the completed thing. This is including the split card randomizers?

Yep!  Those randomizers are lowest priority right now, though.

Of course, gotta have the actual cards that are played with looking nice first. Any idea how they'll be made selectable in the wiki?

I mean, Knights, Ruins and Castles have names of their own that you click on, but the naming system for the other multicard piles feature Card1/Card2 as their names.

My current plan is to just use the top card in the pile when using the Kingdom template, and put the randomizers into the Split pile article, except for the Castles randomizer, which goes on the Castles page.  I don't see a point in having a separate card1/card2 article.

EDIT: Also, Jesus, there's a lot of blood on Conquest's art.  I think that's the most blood we've ever seen on a card before.

« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 11:14:35 pm by werothegreat »
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

quazerflame

  • Pearl Diver
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +20
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #251 on: June 11, 2016, 11:17:42 pm »
+2

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.

Awesome, can't wait to see the completed thing. This is including the split card randomizers?

Yep!  Those randomizers are lowest priority right now, though.

Of course, gotta have the actual cards that are played with looking nice first. Any idea how they'll be made selectable in the wiki?

I mean, Knights, Ruins and Castles have names of their own that you click on, but the naming system for the other multicard piles feature Card1/Card2 as their names.

My current plan is to just use the top card in the pile when using the Kingdom template, and put the randomizers into the Split pile article, except for the Castles randomizer, which goes on the Castles page.  I don't see a point in having a separate card1/card2 article.

EDIT: Also, Jesus, there's a lot of blood on Conquest's art.  I think that's the most blood we've ever seen on a card before.

(picture removed for sanity's sake)

All of this over two Silvers. Yikes.

And that idea makes sense, put the randomizers in the same page as the article. What do you mean by Kingdom template, though?
« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 11:19:16 pm by quazerflame »
Logged

Beyond Awesome

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2906
  • Shuffle iT Username: Beyond Awesome
  • Respect: +2404
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #252 on: June 11, 2016, 11:23:25 pm »
+1

All the Secret Histories have been added to the wiki.  Working on card scans now.

Awesome, can't wait to see the completed thing. This is including the split card randomizers?

Yep!  Those randomizers are lowest priority right now, though.

Of course, gotta have the actual cards that are played with looking nice first. Any idea how they'll be made selectable in the wiki?

I mean, Knights, Ruins and Castles have names of their own that you click on, but the naming system for the other multicard piles feature Card1/Card2 as their names.

My current plan is to just use the top card in the pile when using the Kingdom template, and put the randomizers into the Split pile article, except for the Castles randomizer, which goes on the Castles page.  I don't see a point in having a separate card1/card2 article.

EDIT: Also, Jesus, there's a lot of blood on Conquest's art.  I think that's the most blood we've ever seen on a card before.

(picture removed for sanity's sake)

All of this over two Silvers. Yikes.


SCSN is out for blood
Logged

quazerflame

  • Pearl Diver
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +20
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #253 on: June 12, 2016, 12:30:21 am »
0

Quote
Other Rules clarifications: You receive +1VP.png from all Victory cards in play, including your opponents'.

Saw this pop up while I was wandering the wiki. I don't know how an opponent might be able to have a victory card in play during your turn. I don't think there are any Action-Victory-Duration cards, for example.

EDIT: How do you get the VP symbol to show up? I want to replace "VP.png" up there with it.
Logged

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #254 on: June 12, 2016, 12:31:16 am »
0

Quote
Other Rules clarifications: You receive +1VP.png from all Victory cards in play, including your opponents'.

Saw this pop up while I was wandering the wiki. I don't know how an opponent might be able to have a victory card in play during your turn. I don't think there are any Action-Victory-Duration cards, for example.

You can gain cards when it isn't your turn.  :)
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

singletee

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 843
  • Shuffle iT Username: singletee
  • Gold, Silver, Copper, Let's Jam!
  • Respect: +1455
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #255 on: June 12, 2016, 12:32:52 am »
+1

Quote
Other Rules clarifications: You receive +1VP.png from all Victory cards in play, including your opponents'.

Saw this pop up while I was wandering the wiki. I don't know how an opponent might be able to have a victory card in play during your turn. I don't think there are any Action-Victory-Duration cards, for example.

EDIT: How do you get the VP symbol to show up? I want to replace "VP.png" up there with it.

They could Inherit a Duration.

quazerflame

  • Pearl Diver
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +20
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #256 on: June 12, 2016, 12:39:14 am »
0

Quote
Other Rules clarifications: You receive +1VP.png from all Victory cards in play, including your opponents'.

Saw this pop up while I was wandering the wiki. I don't know how an opponent might be able to have a victory card in play during your turn. I don't think there are any Action-Victory-Duration cards, for example.

EDIT: How do you get the VP symbol to show up? I want to replace "VP.png" up there with it.

You can gain cards when it isn't your turn.  :)

They could Inherit a Duration.

First up, I had forgotten that you can gain cards while it isn't your turn. Second off, how the heck did I forget about Inheritance? XD

Ooo! What if you managed to gain that Castle between turns while resolving Dominate? Now I want to figure out how to do that!
Logged

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7979
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Prepare to be boarded!
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #257 on: June 12, 2016, 09:46:31 am »
+1

Okay, these three Landmarks are definitely Lynell Ingram's best artwork to date, but what the hell is the lady on the left just casually pouring into the bath???

Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #258 on: June 12, 2016, 09:59:45 am »
0

what the hell is the lady on the left just casually pouring into the bath???
Rare ungulants.
Logged

crj

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +824
    • View Profile
Re: Empires Rulebook
« Reply #259 on: June 12, 2016, 10:00:41 am »