some early vote analysis:
Today people have voted for..... (number in front is the votes in order that they occurred, votes in ( ) are the number of votes on that person including that vote.
Jimm: 37 - sudgy (2), 47 - archetype (2)
raerae: 27 - mail-mi (1), 52 - Ozle (3)
yuma: 15 - mail-mi (1), 23 - jimm (6), 30 - ash (1), 31 - jimmm (6), 35 - ash (2), 38 - Ozle (2), 46 - archetype (1)
ashersky: 5 - eevee (1), 7 - Insom (4), 11- mcmc (1), 21 - jorbles (1), 24 - yuma (1), 26 - Ozle (1), 33 - ash (1), 39 - Ozle (3)
Insomniac: 8 - sudgy (1)
Eevee: 9 - sparky (1), 27 - Ozle (2), 29 - mail-mi (2), 32 - ozle (2), 49 - archetype (4)
Jorbles: 1 - insomniac (1), 6 - Jimm (2), 19 - Insomniac (1), 20 - Jimmm (6), 41 - sudgy (3), 53 - Jimmmm (1)
liopoil: 10 - Jimm (3), 34 - mail-mi (2), 40 - Lekkit (1), 42 - sudgy (4), 51 - archetype (6)
archetype
mcmcsalot: 13 - Jimmm (5), 45 - Ozle (5)
sudgy: 2 - insomniac (2), 14 - Jimmm (6), 25 - yuma (2), 28 - Jimm (6), 43 - Ozle (4), 50 - archetype (5)
Lekkit
Ozle: 3 - Jimmmm (1), 36 - ash (3)
mail-mi: 4 - Insomniac (3), 12 - Jimmm (4), 16 - liopoil (1), 17 - sparky (1), 18 - Jimmm (6), 22 - insomniac (1), 24 - Jimmmm (7), 48 - archetype (3)
So obvious stuff from this... first no votes from Lekkit or arch/sparky. That is bad. Also bad is Insomniac only voting once.
Surprising is how few times both ozle and mcmc have voted (as well as jimmm and raerae). I think some scum is very likely to be in that grouping of four, maybe 2, at least 1. People who I think are townier based off their voting: mail-mi, ash and jorbles because they are really trying, probing and being towny with their votes, except for ash's self vote--but I basically asked him to do that.