If you don't mind Jack Rudd, I have some questions about high-level chess I've never really understood. What role does opening theory play at the IM/GM/super-GM level? Can you really just force draws by your choice of opening, if that's your goal? I ask because I see analysis that says something like "17...Be6 and here a draw was agreed in view of 2004 Kasparov-Morozevich which continued blahblahblah 1/2 - 1/2." Those such games must be dreadfully dull.
The role of opening theory varies considerably from player to player at any given level. Some strong players rely very heavily on trying to get an opening advantage and exploit it, others are content to get a playable position and make stuff happen from there. (Magnus Carlsen, the current world #1, is in the latter category.)
There aren't exactly openings that force draws, although some are very hard to gain an advantage against.
To the poster who played 1.e4, I play 1...c5.