I think I can provide some context here. I know Paul Schulzetenberg. I did not know he had a blog. He lived in my area until recently and was the founder of the gaming group I attend on a weely-ish basis. If he played all three of those games in one night, I can tell you with 100% certainty that I was there. There's a very good chance that it was at my house. (EDIT: Just checked my email archive; yep, I hosted that evening.)
Paul Schulzetenberg is the Cult of the New. Dude has shelves of games and he's constantly buying, selling, and trading them. It is my perception that the Cult of the New is as much about buying games as it is about playing them. Donald X's games never seem to catch on with Cultists of the New, and well this blog post is more of the same as far as that goes. It's interesting/insulting that he sees Donald's games as the "absurdist endpoint" of the Cult of the New; in my opinion they're the antithesis of it. They're games that are meant to be replayed over and over, rather than played 1 to 3 times and then sold or traded away.
Anyway, Paul's a pretty reasonable guy in my experience. His claim that what you learn in one play of e.g. Dominion doesn't carry over to the next is obviously ridiculous and I wonder whether he really believes it himself. Glancing over some of the other posts on his blog, I'm guessing he's writing to entertain, so probably there's some hyperbole. And maybe he was just disappointed that we played a bunch of Donald X. games that night when he wanted to play something else (we do not play exclusively Donald X games every time I host this group, in case you were wondering). He's visiting the area and there's a good chance I'll see him this week. I guess I won't be inviting him to play Dominion.
EDIT: By the way, Seprix, how did you come across this?