I think I have already pre-answered a majority of the points you mentioned here, but why not do a head-to-head confrontation?
Eevee shouldn't be scum because he didn't vote for CF. (I've already pointed out there fallacy of this logic in my case on Eevee).
This is not a premise and my argument is independent of this.
He can't be partners with me because we've gone after each other too much. (A reasonable case if you were making this case fresh when you posted it. But when you softclaimed the existence of this case way back when, this argument was invalid, and incredibly weak at best, as I had said two things to Eevee, and him just one to me).
As I said, my argument does not base on post counts. The point is the content, which you have doubly confirmed with two posts and it is enough for me.
He can't be partners with PPS because you read PPS as town. (You don't even provide a logical reason for this, instead stating "just because" - but this isn't even the worst one because....)
True. That is a weak point of the argument but I guess we both agree that PPS is town now right?
He can't be partners with SB because... Oh wait, you didn't even MENTION Shark_Bait.
I explained this earlier. (me, you, PPS, Robz) is different from sharky. He only reluctantly put down his vote near the end of d1. I think it should be obvious for you if you were town that for my theory sharky need not be included here. (If eevee is scum he must have planned this with his partner that is on the other end of the wagon... and sharky is not on the other end of the wagon most of the time!)
To conclude, you admit your earlier play was just a bunch of nonsense to try and "catch me out" - and you admit that you've been primarily looking for/at Galz+X pairings.
I admitted no such things. and see the quote below:
(by me)
(Also, actually as you can read from here my suspicion now is Galz+X, where X is either YN or manda. My previous hideous attitude was trying to hide my suspicion on Galz and tried to see if I could see his response to other's wagon with no relation to himself. Now that he just responded that by lurking I guess that plan didn't quite work.)
See the "now" there in the first sentence? Galz+X is the conclusion after your lurking. Not before. Which is consistent with everything that I have said. And just let me say that again:
1. I think there is a scum between YN and manda.
2. Their partner can be Galz. Note this is different from I am exclusively looking for Galz+X, but just that if it is indeed Galz+X Galz may provide us some information who that X is.
3. So I hid the reasoning why I put eevee away, in the hope that Galz did not realize he is in part of my suspicion and hope that if he is scum I will catch something.
4. Didn't work. Galz basically said nothing. eevee asks me whether I am suspicious of Galz.
5. Then to push things forward I may as well speak out my theory and put some pressure on Galz instead.
Now however, you're trying to paint my insistence that this is the case full of fallacies that you presented as a scumlie. It's not, and it's all above to prove. You go so far NOW to claim that your above arguments don't actually paint me as scum.
So now I have explained how my play is consistent with what I said, even with the nitpicking you are doing with it. How do you explain me playing scum starting with that fakeclaim? Epic bad scum suicide and then double suicide by having eevee buddying up with me?
You've been nothing but inconsistent, you've stated things that are quite simply false, you've misrepresented the truth, made leading arguments so full of holes that a cow would fall right through, and there's only one good reason for it all.
This is a very truth statement, but misdirected.