@manda: Actually, it seems I cannot find your original case against eevee, except based on some sort of overall feeling... If you have something more specific, do you mind pointing it out where it is?
For my argument, the point is that if it is according to plan (one scum stays behind a wagon while the other speaks highly against it) it seems a bit unlikely that one scum will just say it straight that the other is suspicious of being over-confident. The key is that the scums cannot know beforehand that a pair analysis would be available to determine a single person's innocence. If he is not careful enough he may be pushing his partner's wagon and if other townee buys it he would be then in a bad position to back off.
But sure, it is just an argument, not something definite. So I am fine if you don't buy it.
But here's something different. Galz is accusing me scum based on that he thought me "obviously" fakeclaimed then retracted then found a reason for it later. Don't you find that rather ridiculous?
First as I said, if I were scum, there is really no reason for me to fake claim at that point. Second, if I were scum and I indeed somehow decided to fakeclaim, it would then be horrible play to immediately retract that. Then I had to find something reasonable to say afterwards... which I actually did. Really, how likely is this scenario?