Here's where I'm at regarding possible pairings and possible game-states:
We had RB, Tracker, Bodyguard and Vig. This means scum took at least two roles, one of which was JOAT, which mcmc got.
I think there's a decent chance they recruited the traitor, but something like daychat is also quite possible, and could also motivate the last remaining scum to want to recruit the traitor rather than just leave them be.
Situations where scum recruited the traitor N0, anddecided to no-kill (or just forgot to kill) on N4:
Dylan-Didds: possible.
Dylan-EFHW: what was going on with EFHW's weird voting alongside mcmc?
Dylan-Joth: what was mcmc doing building a D1 case on Joth like that?
Didds-EFHW: what was going on with EFHW's weird voting alongside mcmc?
Didds-Joth: what was mcmc doing building a D1 case on Joth like that?
EFHW-Joth: GG.. all the D1 voting threw me way off, and the extra stuff Joth has been posting was creative thinking as scum. This one seems unlikely enough that I'm happy just to discount it, unless anyone can put forward a good explanation for it all.
Now going pairwise where one person is the traitor.
Dylan with traitor!Didds: possible.
Didds with traitor!Dylan: possible.
Dylan with traitor!EFHW: possible.
EFHW with traitor!Dylan: less likely.
Dylan with traitor!Joth: possible.
Joth with traitor!Dylan: less likely.
Didds with traitor!EFHW: possible
EFHW with traitor!Didds: much less likely.
Didds with traitor!Joth: possible.
Joth with traitor!Didds: less likely.
EFHW with traitor!Joth: less likely.
Joth with traitor!EFHW: much less likely.
I feel like the reads today have made me feel like EFHW and Didds don't work as well as a scum pairing, but a lot of the rest hasn't changed since the previous game-day, which is annoying.
PPE: 3