Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 49 [All]

Author Topic: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!  (Read 116720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« on: February 18, 2021, 04:55:01 pm »


M134: Conference Call Mafia Version 2.0

*This is the reboot thread*


This will be a Stack the Deck game for 12 Players.
You will find all the given game information in the following post.

MOD: Swowl


Sign Up List:
1. WCD
2. MiX - Killed Night 2 - Town Vig
3. faust - Exiled Day 3 - Town Tracker
4. EFHW - Exiled Day 5 - Vanilla Townie
5. gkreig - Exiled Day 2 - Vanilla Townie
6. Dylan
7. Robz - Killed Night 1 - Town Bodyguard
8. Space
9. mathdude - exiled Day 1 - Town Roleblocker
10. MCMC - Killed Night 1 - Mafia JOAT
11. Joth
12. Ashersky - Killed Night 4 - Vanilla Townie

Tags:

Game Tracker:


The Rules:

The Golden Rule:
This is a game. Everyone who signs up to play must be considerate of each other, never get personal, and focus on having fun. Once the game starts, having signed up is a commitment: inactivity is just as inconsiderate as rude comments.

The Standard Rules:
1. No communication between players outside of the game thread or shared QTs at any time. This includes passing references, jokes, or cases in other games or threads, whether in context or not.
2. If the game thread is locked, do not post. If you are unsure if something is locked, ask the mod by PM.
3. Direct or verbatim quoting of mod-provided information (including QT opening and closing times) is strictly forbidden. Paraphrasing is okay.
4. Actions with instructions that do not specify a game state will be resolved in the order they are received.
5. All night actions must be submitted within 36 hours of day ending.
6. Players must post once every 24 hours.
7. Do not edit or delete posts, ever. If you need to clarify or correct something, post again.
8. Invisible text, font size less than 10, and spoiler tags are not allowed.
9. Cryptography is not allowed.
10. The time between an exile being reached and a flip being provided is called twilight. All players may continue posting during this time, including the exiled player.
11. Dead players may not post in thread or QT, except their Role QT. An exiled player is not "dead" until a flip has been provided.
12. Personal multimedia, such as video or audio recordings, are not allowed in the game thread.

The Voting Rules:
1. Votes should be in this format: Vote: Playername. Unambigiuous nicknames are acceptable, or any string that uniquely identifies a user. Note that the point of voting is, in fact, unambiguity, and attempting to make it unclear to other players (or, of course, mods) which user you are voting for is very ill-advised.
2. Unvotes should be in this format: unvote or Unvote: Playername.
3. Unvotes are not required if changing your vote from one player to another.
4. You may vote: no exile.
5. Exiles occur when a simple majority (rounded up) of living players is reached. Once reached, an exile cannot be undone.
6. If a majority lynch is not reached by the Day's deadline, no lynch occurs.

The Rest:
1. Bold, Brown text are reserved for the MODs. Players may not use it.
2. If you have an issue or problem with the game, please PM the Mod. Do not post complaints in the game thread.
3. Mods make mistakes - please point them out gently. If they can be corrected, they will. If irreversible, they will stand as final to be commiserated over after the game.
4. If a mod error disadvantages one faction greatly, the game may be called off.
5. Ask all questions and make all requests directly to the Mod via PM. Questions deemed as "universal" (defined as questions for which the answers should be available to all players) will be requested to be re-posted in the Game Thread and answered there.
6. Players may request prods on other players if they have not posted in 24 hours. Players are subject to replacement or modkill after one prod.
7. All rule violations will be dealt with according to their severity, as determined by the mod.
8. Each player will receive their own QT, regardless of role. Don't quote from it.
9. If the game goes on for 3 days and 3 nights without a lynch or nightkill, town wins.

Deadlines:
1. Days will last seven IRL days.
2. Nights will last 48 hours.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2021, 06:02:50 pm by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2021, 04:55:30 pm »

Stack the Deck setup is an open standard setup.

There will be a total of twelve players, consisting of:
2 Mafia
1 1-shot Bulletproof Traitor (Mafia Aligned)
9 Town

Mechanics:
- Daystart
- Role Modification
During pre-game, mafia have 24 hours to select which (if any) of the modifications they want to their team. A maximum of three modifications may be selected.

- Bulletproof
 - Role Cop - The Role Cop can both perform the kill and perform the role copping in the same night.
 - JOAT (1 shot Strongman, 1 shot Ninja)
 - Daytalk (passive ability)
 - Recruit Traitor as Mafia Goon


For each modification that is selected by the mafia, town gains an additional role as well. The town has two roles to start, resulting in a maximum of five town roles randomly selected from the following:

 - Goon Cop - returns results of Goon, Not Goon or no result regardless of alignment.
 - Roleblocker
 - Tracker
 - Bodyguard
 - Vigilante
 - Innocent Child (reveal at start of day one)


- At the beginning of the game all town aligned players receive a "Vanilla Town" role. Once mafia has selected their abilities all town roles go out. This prevents claims of "received roles before/after mafia modifications".
- No player may receive more than one role/modification.
- The mafia traitor may not receive any abilities if not recruited as well.
- If the mafia traitor is the last mafia player alive, he will still be a "traitor" and retain possession of the 1-shot bulletproof if it has not been used up.
- Bulletproofs are passive abilities and as such are only used up when the player is targeted for a night kill. The player will not be told if their bulletproofs have been used up. Bulletproofness cannot be roleblocked.
- Trackers tracking someone who has been roleblocked will return the result of the intended target as if it had not been roleblocked.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2021, 04:56:41 pm »

This thread is LOCKED until start of Day 1.

Please check your inbox for new QTs. Please trash your old QTs to avoid potential confusion.
Please make sure to confirm new roles when you get them.

Sorry again all!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2021, 05:57:30 pm »

All PMs have been sent. Please check and confirm.
Please hide/delete your old one's to avoid potential confusion.
Game is set to start tomorrow at 3pm FT.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2021, 07:01:34 pm »

/tag
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2021, 07:06:14 pm »

/tag :-)
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2021, 07:07:55 pm »

/tag
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2021, 07:36:26 pm »

/tag
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2021, 11:23:26 pm »

/tag
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2021, 12:33:44 am »

/tag
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2021, 06:03:07 pm »

cool cool cool. everything is set. Game will open in a few hours.
check your QTs again before posting in the game.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2021, 10:38:38 pm »

Attention everyone! Are we all here? I would like to again apologize for our previous uhm... technical difficulties...
Ahem*

Welcome to the first socially distanced FDS Conference Call of 2021! I see there are 12 of you that were able to make it... which is great! There is one issue I would like to bring to everyone's attention though...

As soon as this call started, some among us started hacking into our personal information. Something about the combination of knowing who would be here combined with access to their IP is allowing them to steal all of our private info. So, while I was hoping this call would consist of socially distanced drinking games and some good old fun... instead we gotta figure out who these people are. Good Luck!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2021, 10:39:18 pm »

Vote Count 1.0:

Not Voting (12): WestCoastDidds, MiX, EFHW, faust, gkrieg, Robz888, SpaceAnenome, mathdude, mcmcsalot, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time.

THREAD UNLOCKED!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2021, 10:41:58 pm »

Hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi!

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2021, 10:43:33 pm »

Here’s a question....what does the /tag mean?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2021, 12:08:42 am »

Hello all.

Welcome mathdude!  Where are you located?

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Also, since I'm new here, I'm not exactly sure what the accepted practices are for starting these games.  So until I learn them, I'll just do as I see fit.  Day 1 is a shot in the dark. So unless there's a common consensus not to lynch...

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.
Logged
he/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2021, 12:16:28 am »

Here’s a question....what does the /tag mean?

Just a way to get updates when the thread is posted in.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2021, 12:19:03 am »

Hello all.

Welcome mathdude!  Where are you located?

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Also, since I'm new here, I'm not exactly sure what the accepted practices are for starting these games.  So until I learn them, I'll just do as I see fit.  Day 1 is a shot in the dark. So unless there's a common consensus not to lynch...

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

Here at F.DS we always exile on day 1.

Also we started saying exile instead of lynch for cultural sensitivity reasons.

Also we like to start with RVS.

Vote: Didds for not knowing what a tag is for.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2021, 12:41:11 am »

vote: WCD

Does someone still always claim SK?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2021, 02:37:36 am »

Weeeeee I'm in a game!

Robz, were you scum in the first iteration of this?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2021, 02:40:01 am »

vote: WCD

Does someone still always claim SK?
That was Joseph's thing; they are not here. But I can claim SK if it makes you happy.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2021, 03:19:55 am »

It's been so long I almost forgot to open the game correctly. Vote: LL

*proceeds to double check to see if he's actually in this game*
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #22 on: February 20, 2021, 03:27:59 am »

*is now sad that LL isn't*

Hello all.

Welcome mathdude!  Where are you located?

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Also, since I'm new here, I'm not exactly sure what the accepted practices are for starting these games.  So until I learn them, I'll just do as I see fit.  Day 1 is a shot in the dark. So unless there's a common consensus not to lynch...

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #23 on: February 20, 2021, 07:29:21 am »

True, but given he FoS’d you your vote has an implied OMGUS.

Vote: Dylan32
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2021, 08:37:51 am »


Here at F.DS we always exile on day 1.

Also we started saying exile instead of lynch for cultural sensitivity reasons.

Also we like to start with RVS.

Vote: Didds for not knowing what a tag is for.

I still can’t say that I understand it. I mean, I get why you’d want to know when things start.... but then why not just click the notify tab?

Of course the litany of things I don’t quite understand is legion, so I’ll just add it to the heap. (Conjures up image of the All-Knowing Trash Heap from Fraggle Rock)

Also, hi Joth! Missed you!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2021, 08:47:41 am »

lynch

Well we don't lynch here anymore, we just exile people...out of the call, I suppose would be the flavor here.

Hi everyone I miss you guys hi mathdude check pledge and other forum slang blablabla mcmc you're my favourite ike is awesome and I remember that pfp anywhere vote: mcmc somethingosmething

Okay, it's game time.

vote: WCD

Does someone still always claim SK?

Yes. I see you're taking a page from LL's book and jumping on the only wagon in town, interesting.

Weeeeee I'm in a game!

Robz, were you scum in the first iteration of this?

Can we talk about this? Because that would be a game changer. Did you ask if this was okay already? Seems like a scum move.

Vote: faust

*is now sad that LL isn't*

Hello all.

Welcome mathdude!  Where are you located?

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Also, since I'm new here, I'm not exactly sure what the accepted practices are for starting these games.  So until I learn them, I'll just do as I see fit.  Day 1 is a shot in the dark. So unless there's a common consensus not to lynch...

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Hey, I put down FoSes on my very first game, if anything it's a reliable towntell, not scummy.

True, but given he FoS’d you your vote has an implied OMGUS.

Vote: Dylan32

Oh I didn't even notice Dylan was the one voting. Huh.


Here at F.DS we always exile on day 1.

Also we started saying exile instead of lynch for cultural sensitivity reasons.

Also we like to start with RVS.

Vote: Didds for not knowing what a tag is for.

I still can’t say that I understand it. I mean, I get why you’d want to know when things start.... but then why not just click the notify tab?

Of course the litany of things I don’t quite understand is legion, so I’ll just add it to the heap. (Conjures up image of the All-Knowing Trash Heap from Fraggle Rock)

Also, hi Joth! Missed you!

Not pressing F5 on the Recent Posts page like a madman will always baffle me. Basically, people have their own methods to be notified.


Wall post! I promise I won't do another one of these with this much content (read: with barely no content), but I couldn't help myself.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2021, 08:53:27 am »

Dylan, are you feeling sullied by your fall from innocence?

Ashersky, hi! How are you and how are things? You’ve been missed!

Mathdude! Howdy hey! Canada! Sweet! I love when we get all international. Also, welcome! It’s awesome to have new folks in the mix.

faust! It’s always good to see you! I hope things in your neck of the woods are going well.

MiXy! Hi! I have been watching too many travel shows lately, but there is a really good Somebody Feed Phil episode in Lisbon that made me think of you. Your love of mcmc was unknown to me before now. I mean I get it, but that means I’m no your favorite so there’s that.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2021, 09:01:53 am »

Didds don’t be jelly mix and I have a love that’s pure and true. Also what’s the notify button? Me tag, me see posts.

Mathman my guy welcome! I’m in Michigan so we basically live in the same place. Also Robz is my irl brother.

What’s this fall from innocence didds speaks of Dylan?
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #28 on: February 20, 2021, 09:09:17 am »

Wow I can use speech to text on mobile to calculate mafia posts that’s awesome and will be extremely helpful with the nine month child so get ready for lack of punctuation formatting of any kind and run-on sentences woo hoo! I can do delete wait I lied I can’t do punctuation I just have to say it out loud. Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space Martha playing this game this is too much fun OK I’m down for now

Edit point I can do punctuation not can’t got it

Second edit point am I old?
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #29 on: February 20, 2021, 09:10:16 am »

Also vote: robz for posting a picture of me and Ariana with my 70s style quarantine hair and not my awesome hip man bun.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #30 on: February 20, 2021, 09:10:29 am »

Also Ariana says hi
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2021, 09:17:34 am »

Weeeeee I'm in a game!

Robz, were you scum in the first iteration of this?

Can we talk about this? Because that would be a game changer. Did you ask if this was okay already? Seems like a scum move.

Vote: faust
Why wouldn't we be able to talk about it? I am able to talk about it, look: I got Roleblocker last game.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #32 on: February 20, 2021, 09:20:45 am »


Here at F.DS we always exile on day 1.

Also we started saying exile instead of lynch for cultural sensitivity reasons.

Also we like to start with RVS.

Vote: Didds for not knowing what a tag is for.

... there’s a notify tab?

I still can’t say that I understand it. I mean, I get why you’d want to know when things start.... but then why not just click the notify tab?

Of course the litany of things I don’t quite understand is legion, so I’ll just add it to the heap. (Conjures up image of the All-Knowing Trash Heap from Fraggle Rock)

Also, hi Joth! Missed you!
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #33 on: February 20, 2021, 09:21:11 am »


Here at F.DS we always exile on day 1.

Also we started saying exile instead of lynch for cultural sensitivity reasons.

Also we like to start with RVS.

Vote: Didds for not knowing what a tag is for.

... there’s a notify tab?

I still can’t say that I understand it. I mean, I get why you’d want to know when things start.... but then why not just click the notify tab?

Of course the litany of things I don’t quite understand is legion, so I’ll just add it to the heap. (Conjures up image of the All-Knowing Trash Heap from Fraggle Rock)

Also, hi Joth! Missed you!

Ugh quote fail. Ahem.

...there’s a notify tab?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #34 on: February 20, 2021, 09:23:22 am »

Second edit point am I old?
Not as long as you can pull off a hip man bun!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #35 on: February 20, 2021, 09:23:37 am »

Mcmc you have offspring? I thought you were a kid yourself!
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #36 on: February 20, 2021, 09:27:12 am »

Didds don’t be jelly mix and I have a love that’s pure and true. Also what’s the notify button? Me tag, me see posts.

Mathman my guy welcome! I’m in Michigan so we basically live in the same place. Also Robz is my irl brother.

What’s this fall from innocence didds speaks of Dylan?

<3

Probably that Dylan was an IC and isn't anymore.

Weeeeee I'm in a game!

Robz, were you scum in the first iteration of this?

Can we talk about this? Because that would be a game changer. Did you ask if this was okay already? Seems like a scum move.

Vote: faust
Why wouldn't we be able to talk about it? I am able to talk about it, look: I got Roleblocker last game.

I thought

For sake of fairness, let's NOT discuss anything until after the game concludes.

Was absolute, but I guess you can interpret it differently.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #37 on: February 20, 2021, 09:27:52 am »

Weeeeee I'm in a game!

Robz, were you scum in the first iteration of this?

Can we talk about this? Because that would be a game changer. Did you ask if this was okay already? Seems like a scum move.

Vote: faust
Why wouldn't we be able to talk about it? I am able to talk about it, look: I got Roleblocker last game.
I think Swowl asked us not to talk about it.

PPE: ninja'd
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #38 on: February 20, 2021, 09:28:36 am »

And Hi!
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #39 on: February 20, 2021, 09:30:35 am »

Hello all.

Welcome mathdude!  Where are you located?

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Also, since I'm new here, I'm not exactly sure what the accepted practices are for starting these games.  So until I learn them, I'll just do as I see fit.  Day 1 is a shot in the dark. So unless there's a common consensus not to lynch...

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.
Wait, Robz voting stage is a thing on other sites??!! 😋
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #40 on: February 20, 2021, 09:31:20 am »

vote: Robz
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #41 on: February 20, 2021, 09:38:34 am »

Second edit point am I old?
Not as long as you can pull off a hip man bun!

I’m not sure about it anymore to be honest little bun was cute now it’s a little unruly. I really enjoyed a lose French braid through the top into a little bun at the back but my wife said it was unacceptable. Also ponytail headaches are no joke!
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #42 on: February 20, 2021, 09:40:00 am »

Mcmc you have offspring? I thought you were a kid yourself!

First mafia posts of mine were made from the backseat of my moms car on the way to college. Now they are made with voice memo’s while holding my nine month daughter. It has been a hell of a journey!
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #43 on: February 20, 2021, 09:40:11 am »

For sake of fairness, let's NOT discuss anything until after the game concludes.

Was absolute, but I guess you can interpret it differently.
Ah I guess I just thought this was about what caused the reset. It was said that there was a complete reroll, so I don't see much of a problem in discussing the old setup. But I guess it's good to adhere to this rule more strictly.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #44 on: February 20, 2021, 09:41:00 am »

Didds don’t be jelly mix and I have a love that’s pure and true. Also what’s the notify button? Me tag, me see posts.

Mathman my guy welcome! I’m in Michigan so we basically live in the same place. Also Robz is my irl brother.

What’s this fall from innocence didds speaks of Dylan?

<3

Probably that Dylan was an IC and isn't anymore.

Weeeeee I'm in a game!

Robz, were you scum in the first iteration of this?

Can we talk about this? Because that would be a game changer. Did you ask if this was okay already? Seems like a scum move.

Vote: faust
Why wouldn't we be able to talk about it? I am able to talk about it, look: I got Roleblocker last game.

I thought

For sake of fairness, let's NOT discuss anything until after the game concludes.

Was absolute, but I guess you can interpret it differently.

Ah the first part makes sense but I didn’t put that together because of the second point which I also thought was a thing.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #45 on: February 20, 2021, 09:46:45 am »

For sake of fairness, let's NOT discuss anything until after the game concludes.

Was absolute, but I guess you can interpret it differently.
Ah I guess I just thought this was about what caused the reset. It was said that there was a complete reroll, so I don't see much of a problem in discussing the old setup. But I guess it's good to adhere to this rule more strictly.

I have my thoughts about this, and if I was a mod I would certainly choose to not allow any discussion about last game, so I think it's best to not talk about it.

PPE: I don't think we'll be able to erase the fact that Dylan was IC from our minds. Well, that and it was public knowledge, so, eh.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #46 on: February 20, 2021, 10:02:06 am »

Vote: Dylan
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #47 on: February 20, 2021, 10:30:53 am »

Hi all!

Vote: ash, for obvious reasons
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #48 on: February 20, 2021, 10:35:09 am »

Looks like Swowl doesn't want us to say what roles/alignment we had last time?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #49 on: February 20, 2021, 10:36:02 am »

Mcmc you have offspring? I thought you were a kid yourself!

First mafia posts of mine were made from the backseat of my moms car on the way to college. Now they are made with voice memo’s while holding my nine month daughter. It has been a hell of a journey!

My first post on these forums was nearly 10 years ago!
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #50 on: February 20, 2021, 10:36:27 am »

Also vote: robz for posting a picture of me and Ariana with my 70s style quarantine hair and not my awesome hip man bun.

Me and Ariana looked super cute tho
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #51 on: February 20, 2021, 10:37:40 am »

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #52 on: February 20, 2021, 10:48:23 am »

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Ok, so your vote isn't really "no reason", is it?

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

I can play that game too.  I'll follow up my FoS with
vote: Dylan32
Logged
he/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #53 on: February 20, 2021, 10:50:09 am »

Woah, that's crazy.

Vote: joth
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #54 on: February 20, 2021, 11:01:33 am »

Woah, that's crazy.

Vote: joth

Why the Joth vote?
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #55 on: February 20, 2021, 11:04:41 am »

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!


In our games at least—not sure if this is true elsewhere—more PRs SEEM to correlate with better town performance. Not really because PRs are used very effectively, or even because we are so adept at figuring out claims, but because Named Townie is a thing and it really does help with process of elimination.

(I am personally a very ineffective scumhunter.)
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #56 on: February 20, 2021, 11:07:16 am »

Woah, that's crazy.

Vote: joth

Why the Joth vote?

True, but given he FoS’d you your vote has an implied OMGUS.

Vote: Dylan32

Joth started this, and I think he's a better vote than mathdude.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #57 on: February 20, 2021, 11:29:43 am »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #58 on: February 20, 2021, 11:34:40 am »

Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space

I am finding you quite confusing :-P

Vote: mcmc
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #59 on: February 20, 2021, 11:35:20 am »

Also, hi everyone! Feels like it's been a while!!
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #60 on: February 20, 2021, 11:37:58 am »

Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space

I am finding you quite confusing :-P

Vote: mcmc

Then it’s working! You scum?

Also, hi everyone! Feels like it's been a while!!

Yea I was shocked when robs told me a new game had opened it was only one game after the last one I played feels like it has been a long long time.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #61 on: February 20, 2021, 11:39:10 am »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #62 on: February 20, 2021, 11:41:01 am »

Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space

I am finding you quite confusing :-P

Vote: mcmc

Then it’s working! You scum?

Also, hi everyone! Feels like it's been a while!!

Yea I was shocked when robs told me a new game had opened it was only one game after the last one I played feels like it has been a long long time.

You missed the greatest game, the game of the Space Gambit.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #63 on: February 20, 2021, 11:50:26 am »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

You’re meaningless!
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #64 on: February 20, 2021, 11:51:13 am »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

You’re meaningless!

Nothing is meaningless.

That sentence has actual game content and I love it.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #65 on: February 20, 2021, 12:09:24 pm »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

You’re meaningless!

Vote: mcmc
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #66 on: February 20, 2021, 12:35:42 pm »

Vote: joth
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #67 on: February 20, 2021, 12:58:23 pm »

Across the top, on the right, directly over the topic title.... a series of tab buttons “reply” “notify” “send this topic” “print”. Notify sends a notification.

Yes, the fall from innocence was Dylan being the IC.

I am always here for the man bun and for baby pictures! Mcmc, mailmi, shraerae, e.... none of you are posting enough baby pictures!

Hi EFHW! Hi Space! Hi Rob!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #68 on: February 20, 2021, 01:00:45 pm »

Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space

I am finding you quite confusing :-P

Vote: mcmc

Then it’s working! You scum?

Also, hi everyone! Feels like it's been a while!!

Yea I was shocked when robs told me a new game had opened it was only one game after the last one I played feels like it has been a long long time.

You missed the greatest game, the game of the Space Gambit.

Space is a genius and has the best gambits!

It seems like we took off all of December and January. It was sad.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #69 on: February 20, 2021, 02:16:34 pm »

Ok, I'm going to say this once so I can try to focus. But I'm enjoying reading this thread so much. Didn't realize how much I missed playing with y'all until we went like two months without a game.

@Didds, nah I don't feel sullied, rather I feel normal. Being announced as IC felt like it almost added pressure; sure I don't have to worry about being misread, but if my reads are wrong it is slightly more likely to hurt town than a normal townie having bad reads. So this is fine.

Re: Space gambit - I feel like I've always just defaulted to townreading Space, but that game finally broke that lol. However, one interesting thing about that game is that it was scum's decision making N0 and going so far against what town expected that gave them the win. So I agree few if any choices would probably be the "correct" play for scum, they might have taken inspiration from that game and taken the riskier, surprising strategy, so let's not throw the game away if it comes down to that without taking the time to carefully think through things and consider everything carefully before jumping to conclusions...

How am I just now learning about the notify button? I mean, I guess I've seen it, but huh... That would have been helpful...
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #70 on: February 20, 2021, 03:20:43 pm »

Vote: joth

Good to see you too buddy.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #71 on: February 20, 2021, 03:25:07 pm »

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Ok, so your vote isn't really "no reason", is it?

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

I can play that game too.  I'll follow up my FoS with
vote: Dylan32

I like this guy, he gets it lol.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #72 on: February 20, 2021, 03:35:41 pm »

Has gkrieg posted yet?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #73 on: February 20, 2021, 03:56:44 pm »

Vote Count 1.1:

Joth (3): MiX, MCMC, faust
Dylan32 (2): Joth, mathdude
MCMC (2): SpaceAnenome, Robz888
WestCoastDidds (1): Ashersky
Robz888 (1): EFHW
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
Not Voting (2): WestCoastDidds, Dylan32


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time.

*Since the previous version of the game and the current game have the same set up and the same players, even though everything was re-rolled and re-randomized, I believe the most fair decision for all players is to not discuss the previous game's content during this game. Thank you.

**Lalight is not in this game :P (dylan, you're vote was not valid)
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #74 on: February 20, 2021, 04:52:24 pm »

Has gkrieg posted yet?

Yeah, he voted ash, why do you ask?

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Ok, so your vote isn't really "no reason", is it?

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

I can play that game too.  I'll follow up my FoS with
vote: Dylan32

I like this guy, he gets it lol.

So do you also agree with his vote?

Re: Space gambit - I feel like I've always just defaulted to townreading Space, but that game finally broke that lol. However, one interesting thing about that game is that it was scum's decision making N0 and going so far against what town expected that gave them the win. So I agree few if any choices would probably be the "correct" play for scum, they might have taken inspiration from that game and taken the riskier, surprising strategy, so let's not throw the game away if it comes down to that without taking the time to carefully think through things and consider everything carefully before jumping to conclusions...

I don't think picking more PRs is comparable to something that, uh, no town aligned player knew was even possible. So I disagree with this fundamentally.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #75 on: February 20, 2021, 07:05:53 pm »

Re: Space gambit - I feel like I've always just defaulted to townreading Space, but that game finally broke that lol. However, one interesting thing about that game is that it was scum's decision making N0 and going so far against what town expected that gave them the win. So I agree few if any choices would probably be the "correct" play for scum, they might have taken inspiration from that game and taken the riskier, surprising strategy, so let's not throw the game away if it comes down to that without taking the time to carefully think through things and consider everything carefully before jumping to conclusions...

I agree obviously we should think things through, although I don't really think there's a comparable gambit available in this setup.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #76 on: February 20, 2021, 10:07:28 pm »

Hey gkrieg, were we mafia partners in a previous iteration of this setup?  I have vague recollections of us choosing no PRs and then lying about a bunch of stuff...and of course winning.  (I feel like we win a lot when we are the bad guys.)

Or was that a different setup?

Also, what's it called when you vote someone just for voting you?  Man, it's been a long time since I played.

vote: gkrieg
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #77 on: February 20, 2021, 10:25:44 pm »

Also, mcmc has nothing to complain about in that online photograph.

Also, I started following Robz on Instagram just now.  life_shonanstyle if you are wondering and have random interest in my watch collecting obsession, microbrews, or pretty pictures of Japan.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #78 on: February 20, 2021, 10:26:23 pm »

Also, on page 4 of the game and not one complaint about a lack of a plan.  Perhaps I finally stayed away long enough to reset my default meta.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #79 on: February 21, 2021, 12:48:06 am »

Also, on page 4 of the game and not one complaint about a lack of a plan.  Perhaps I finally stayed away long enough to reset my default meta.
But now you have reminded us!
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #80 on: February 21, 2021, 01:36:08 am »

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Ok, so your vote isn't really "no reason", is it?

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

I can play that game too.  I'll follow up my FoS with
vote: Dylan32

I like this guy, he gets it lol.

So do you also agree with his vote?

Re: Space gambit - I feel like I've always just defaulted to townreading Space, but that game finally broke that lol. However, one interesting thing about that game is that it was scum's decision making N0 and going so far against what town expected that gave them the win. So I agree few if any choices would probably be the "correct" play for scum, they might have taken inspiration from that game and taken the riskier, surprising strategy, so let's not throw the game away if it comes down to that without taking the time to carefully think through things and consider everything carefully before jumping to conclusions...

I don't think picking more PRs is comparable to something that, uh, no town aligned player knew was even possible. So I disagree with this fundamentally.

Of course I don't agree with the vote in the sense that I know it is not on scum, and therefore it's wrong. I do agree with the principle of the vote, which is that votes and wagons are better than FoSs, because actual votes generate useful info even in RVS, whereas a generic FoS doesn't to the same degree. That's why I poked at the first post in the first place. Turns out doing so generated more interactions and reactions than I even thought it would, so I'm pretty happy that he obliged with the vote even though I know it's wrong.

Of course there's a very big difference between what's possible in this setup and the setup that gave us the Space GambitTM. But surely you understand why I would just want us to take our time and think carefully once we start getting relevant information instead of using assumptions about what choices scum made to make a snap judgement that hands scum the game like town did in that one. Seriously, that was a bitter pill to swallow, and I would love to not repeat it lol.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #81 on: February 21, 2021, 06:01:27 am »

Is "the space gambit" a thing that means SA is mafia?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #82 on: February 21, 2021, 06:02:45 am »

Also, I think it should be the Anemone Artifice instead.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #83 on: February 21, 2021, 07:10:56 am »

I vote

Vote: ashersky


Reason: not knowing the history of stuff here, I have nothing better to do on day 1.

I still suspect Dylan is skum though so I'll probably switch back there eventually.
Logged
he/him

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #84 on: February 21, 2021, 07:11:48 am »

That was supposed to be...
unvote
Vote: ashersky


Stupid autocorrect.
Logged
he/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #85 on: February 21, 2021, 07:39:44 am »

Of course there's a very big difference between what's possible in this setup and the setup that gave us the Space GambitTM. But surely you understand why I would just want us to take our time and think carefully once we start getting relevant information instead of using assumptions about what choices scum made to make a snap judgement that hands scum the game like town did in that one. Seriously, that was a bitter pill to swallow, and I would love to not repeat it lol.

Okay let me just condense this message into something that is applicable:

Do not hammer without intent to hammer, regardless of situation

Thank you all. And I don't think I've swallowed it yet.

Is "the space gambit" a thing that means SA is mafia?

They're talking about the game in Swowl's signature, click on it to see what it is.

I vote

Vote: ashersky


Reason: not knowing the history of stuff here, I have nothing better to do on day 1.

I still suspect Dylan is skum though so I'll probably switch back there eventually.

Your previous vote was better. And why ash?

That was supposed to be...
unvote
Vote: ashersky


Stupid autocorrect.

You don't need to say unvote before voting, by the way.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #86 on: February 21, 2021, 07:40:23 am »

Vote: mathdude
Logged

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #87 on: February 21, 2021, 08:31:29 am »

Reason: not knowing the history of stuff here, I have nothing better to do on day 1.

I still suspect Dylan is skum though so I'll probably switch back there eventually.

Your previous vote was better. And why ash?
I agree, my previous vote was better.  That's why I said so myself!  Why ash?  I don't know... RVS I guess?  Also, seemed like it might generate some discussion.  And it did.  You sure jumped to ash's defense... why so strong of a counter:
Vote: mathdude
*gets suspicious of MiX*

That was supposed to be...
unvote
Vote: ashersky


Stupid autocorrect.

You don't need to say unvote before voting, by the way.
Thanks for the info.  Where I played previously, we had to (bold) unvote before we voted new, so I figured the same was here.  Also, Dylan voted LL, then voted me right after, and Swowl said Dylan's vote didn't count because LL wasn't playing, so I assumed it was because they didn't unvote first before voting me (I guess it's because Swowl probably missed the vote)?
It's been so long I almost forgot to open the game correctly. Vote: LL
*proceeds to double check to see if he's actually in this game*
*is now sad that LL isn't*
Vote: mathdude
**Lalight is not in this game :P (dylan, you're vote was not valid)

Leaving my vote on ash for now.  Seems like the right thing to do.
Logged
he/him

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #88 on: February 21, 2021, 08:32:46 am »

Mathman if you like your vote on Dylan why move to an “I don’t know RVS” vote. That’s moving backwards.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #89 on: February 21, 2021, 08:34:05 am »

Ok, I'm going to say this once so I can try to focus. But I'm enjoying reading this thread so much. Didn't realize how much I missed playing with y'all until we went like two months without a game.

This tho. Part of the reason I think we stalled is because things that take brain are so hard right now. But this game takes brain and gives heart, which is good exchange.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #90 on: February 21, 2021, 08:34:45 am »

Is "the space gambit" a thing that means SA is mafia?

I was mafia alongside Robz and scolapasta in the game where I proposed it, but that has no bearing on the scumteam for this game :-) The game was M129 and here is the scum QT.

In case anyone wants the context but can't be bothered following links, the particular setup randomised town roles, then gave scum a corresponding number of points to spend on powers to compensate. The scum roles -- but importantly not the town roles -- were then announced in-game, so town could then infer their own strength based on the strength of the visible scum roles.

My suggestion was to deliberately fail to spend all our points, thus shifting late-game suspicion onto town's claimed PRs (since there would appear to be too many of them), rather than anyone who wasn't claiming powers. It was such an unexpected thing to do that in that circumstance it was probably worth the extra point easily enough :-) However, it was really only something we'd entertained to start with because we liked the mechanic of a one-point role more than the mechanic of a logical two-point role, but weren't allowed to take two copies of the one-point role.

It's not something I think scum could exploit in this game, though, because rather than scum getting points to spend in reaction to town, in this game town gets randomised roles in response to what scum selects.

PPE: 3
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #91 on: February 21, 2021, 08:36:29 am »

Has gkrieg posted yet?

Yeah, he voted ash, why do you ask?


Was just trying to get a handle on who had shown up. Very little content from him so far, just that one post, so maybe a pressure

vote: gkrieg

is in order.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #92 on: February 21, 2021, 08:38:56 am »

Also, though, I am hard townreading Robz this game so he's almost certainly scum. Just FYI.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #93 on: February 21, 2021, 08:41:29 am »

Also, though, I am hard townreading Robz this game so he's almost certainly scum. Just FYI.

So are you giving us (read: me) permission to tunnel you hard D1 so you're exiled which means your bad reads will be immortalized, making us (me) take them at face value to then misexile in XiLo? Because I want that permission so badly.

Has Robz even done anything this game? All I remember is him parroting the other game.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #95 on: February 21, 2021, 08:54:50 am »

Also, though, I am hard townreading Robz this game so he's almost certainly scum. Just FYI.

So are you giving us (read: me) permission to tunnel you hard D1 so you're exiled which means your bad reads will be immortalized, making us (me) take them at face value to then misexile in XiLo? Because I want that permission so badly.

Has Robz even done anything this game? All I remember is him parroting the other game.

Yea not really, this is the typical anyone wanna exhile robz for being robz post.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #96 on: February 21, 2021, 08:57:29 am »

Also, though, I am hard townreading Robz this game so he's almost certainly scum. Just FYI.

So are you giving us (read: me) permission to tunnel you hard D1 so you're exiled which means your bad reads will be immortalized, making us (me) take them at face value to then misexile in XiLo? Because I want that permission so badly.
You can't want it very bedly, you're not even voting joth.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #97 on: February 21, 2021, 08:58:03 am »

Also, though, I am hard townreading Robz this game so he's almost certainly scum. Just FYI.

So are you giving us (read: me) permission to tunnel you hard D1 so you're exiled which means your bad reads will be immortalized, making us (me) take them at face value to then misexile in XiLo? Because I want that permission so badly.

Has Robz even done anything this game? All I remember is him parroting the other game.

Yea not really, this is the typical anyone wanna exhile robz for being robz post.
Are you referring to joht's or MiX's post?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #98 on: February 21, 2021, 09:02:27 am »

Vote Count 1.1:

Joth (3): MiX, MCMC, faust
Dylan32 (2): Joth, mathdude
MCMC (2): SpaceAnenome, Robz888
WestCoastDidds (1): Ashersky
Robz888 (1): EFHW
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
Not Voting (2): WestCoastDidds, Dylan32


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time.

*Since the previous version of the game and the current game have the same set up and the same players, even though everything was re-rolled and re-randomized, I believe the most fair decision for all players is to not discuss the previous game's content during this game. Thank you.

**Lalight is not in this game :P (dylan, you're vote was not valid)

Dylan voted LL at #21, but then voted mathdude at #22. The second of those votes should have counted, no?

Anyway, my auto-counter differs by Dylan's vote at the point you posted that earlier count, and looks like this now:

mathdude (2): Dylan32, MiX
Robz888 (1): EFHW
ashersky (2): gkrieg13, mathdude
mcmcsalot (2): SpaceAnemone, Robz888
jotheonah (2): mcmcsalot, faust
gkrieg13 (2): ashersky, jotheonah
Not Voting (1): WestCoastDidds
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #99 on: February 21, 2021, 09:06:55 am »

Also, though, I am hard townreading Robz this game so he's almost certainly scum. Just FYI.

So are you giving us (read: me) permission to tunnel you hard D1 so you're exiled which means your bad reads will be immortalized, making us (me) take them at face value to then misexile in XiLo? Because I want that permission so badly.

Has Robz even done anything this game? All I remember is him parroting the other game.

Yea not really, this is the typical anyone wanna exhile robz for being robz post.
Are you referring to joht's or MiX's post?
Joths
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #100 on: February 21, 2021, 09:11:31 am »

Mathman if you like your vote on Dylan why move to an “I don’t know RVS” vote. That’s moving backwards.
Is it moving backwards though? We're not close to deadline yet. And it helped draw some discussion (out of MiX and you).
Logged
he/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #101 on: February 21, 2021, 09:22:27 am »

Oh I don't want to exile Robz. Yet.

I just want him to know I have my eye on him.

And also that I have a good feeling about him.

It's complicated.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #102 on: February 21, 2021, 09:23:09 am »

So are you giving us (read: me) permission to tunnel you hard D1 so you're exiled which means your bad reads will be immortalized, making us (me) take them at face value to then misexile in XiLo? Because I want that permission so badly.

I've seen this movie and I don't care for the ending.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #103 on: February 21, 2021, 11:17:22 am »

Hey gkrieg, were we mafia partners in a previous iteration of this setup?  I have vague recollections of us choosing no PRs and then lying about a bunch of stuff...and of course winning.  (I feel like we win a lot when we are the bad guys.)

Or was that a different setup?

Also, what's it called when you vote someone just for voting you?  Man, it's been a long time since I played.

vote: gkrieg

Sounds familiar. I agree that it is probably the right choice to not choose many options as scum.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #104 on: February 21, 2021, 11:21:32 am »

Has gkrieg posted yet?

Yeah, he voted ash, why do you ask?


Was just trying to get a handle on who had shown up. Very little content from him so far, just that one post, so maybe a pressure

vote: gkrieg

is in order.

I’m usually pretty inactive on the weekends by the way.
Logged

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #105 on: February 21, 2021, 12:09:26 pm »

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.
Logged
he/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #106 on: February 21, 2021, 12:19:47 pm »

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #107 on: February 21, 2021, 12:20:29 pm »

Ok, I'm going to say this once so I can try to focus. But I'm enjoying reading this thread so much. Didn't realize how much I missed playing with y'all until we went like two months without a game.

This tho. Part of the reason I think we stalled is because things that take brain are so hard right now. But this game takes brain and gives heart, which is good exchange.

❤️❤️❤️
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #108 on: February 21, 2021, 12:27:51 pm »

Mathdude, MiX is pretty much the most suspicion-inducing person there is. He does all kinds of things that seem not very town, even when he’s town. I haven’t made up my mind about him this game, but I’d advise taking any suspicion of him with a big grain of salt. He’s his own breed of cat.

I really like the alliteration of Anenome Artiface, but Space Gambit seems more fitting.

You know who the most laid-back assassin is though? EFHW. Stone cold killa. She never seems scummy when she is...

Vote: EFHW

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #109 on: February 21, 2021, 12:56:12 pm »

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?

Not knowing how any of you play, how good of a scum read do you think I can get on anyone? It's day 1 and maybe some of you can read each other, but I'm just guessing.

Dylan was a shot in the dark (I started with him because he's no longer IC). But his reaction and others' responses seem to tell me it's a good spot to leave my vote for now.
I had no read on ash, so that was purely to look for reactions and responses. It worked. I never intended to leave my vote there, and I think that was obvious.
MiX, something about your defense of ash gives me a slight scum-read. I'll let that sit for now, but I will be watching what you say.

You call these deflections. I call them promoting discussion. Maybe I'm doing this "wrong", but this is how I do day 1.

PPE based on what Didds said - thanks for the heads-up. I won't push too hard on MiX yet if they always read scummy.
Logged
he/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #110 on: February 21, 2021, 01:01:32 pm »

Mathdude, MiX is pretty much the most suspicion-inducing person there is. He does all kinds of things that seem not very town, even when he’s town. I haven’t made up my mind about him this game, but I’d advise taking any suspicion of him with a big grain of salt. He’s his own breed of cat.

Dangit Didds, now mathdude won't get a genuine read on me which means I can't just call him town for him scumreading me. How am I supposed to read him now?

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?

Not knowing how any of you play, how good of a scum read do you think I can get on anyone? It's day 1 and maybe some of you can read each other, but I'm just guessing.

Dylan was a shot in the dark (I started with him because he's no longer IC). But his reaction and others' responses seem to tell me it's a good spot to leave my vote for now.
I had no read on ash, so that was purely to look for reactions and responses. It worked. I never intended to leave my vote there, and I think that was obvious.
MiX, something about your defense of ash gives me a slight scum-read. I'll let that sit for now, but I will be watching what you say.

You call these deflections. I call them promoting discussion. Maybe I'm doing this "wrong", but this is how I do day 1.

PPE based on what Didds said - thanks for the heads-up. I won't push too hard on MiX yet if they always read scummy.

I called them distractions, not deflections. Slightly different. And I don't think you're playing incorrectly, I just want to know what's going on inside your head. That's kinda what the game's about.

I would also highly recommend reading past games, getting a feel of someone's meta helps a lot on the first game. I know I did that before I played my first game here and I had the worst reads possible, but hey, it's better than no reads at all.


Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #111 on: February 21, 2021, 01:19:24 pm »

Is "the space gambit" a thing that means SA is mafia?

I was mafia alongside Robz and scolapasta in the game where I proposed it, but that has no bearing on the scumteam for this game :-) The game was M129 and here is the scum QT.

In case anyone wants the context but can't be bothered following links, the particular setup randomised town roles, then gave scum a corresponding number of points to spend on powers to compensate. The scum roles -- but importantly not the town roles -- were then announced in-game, so town could then infer their own strength based on the strength of the visible scum roles.

My suggestion was to deliberately fail to spend all our points, thus shifting late-game suspicion onto town's claimed PRs (since there would appear to be too many of them), rather than anyone who wasn't claiming powers. It was such an unexpected thing to do that in that circumstance it was probably worth the extra point easily enough :-) However, it was really only something we'd entertained to start with because we liked the mechanic of a one-point role more than the mechanic of a logical two-point role, but weren't allowed to take two copies of the one-point role.

It's not something I think scum could exploit in this game, though, because rather than scum getting points to spend in reaction to town, in this game town gets randomised roles in response to what scum selects.

PPE: 3

I would additionally recommend perusing the Scum QT from that game, where it was discussed. You'll see I was HIGHLY reluctant to take less power than we are allowed to take, until Space pointed out the potential trick town and I responded, "Oh shoot that would be kind of cool..."

https://quicktopic.com/53/H/8ZZG4DZBWpX
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #112 on: February 21, 2021, 01:23:26 pm »

Also, mcmc has nothing to complain about in that online photograph.

Also, I started following Robz on Instagram just now.  life_shonanstyle if you are wondering and have random interest in my watch collecting obsession, microbrews, or pretty pictures of Japan.

I followed you back! Nice watches!

For anyone who wants, here are all the Robz links.

My Instagram (mostly selfies and yorkies): https://www.instagram.com/robbysoave8/
My Twitter (political/journalism): https://twitter.com/robbysoave
My Facebook (not actually very active there anymore): https://www.facebook.com/people/Robby-Soave/2259319
My first book: https://www.amazon.com/Panic-Attack-Young-Radicals-Trump/dp/1250169887
My second book (forthcoming): https://www.amazon.com/Tech-Panic-Shouldnt-Facebook-Future/dp/1982159596
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #113 on: February 21, 2021, 01:24:37 pm »

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?

Mathdude seems to be contributing in relatively meaningful ways to me.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #114 on: February 21, 2021, 01:25:43 pm »

Oh I don't want to exile Robz. Yet.

I just want him to know I have my eye on him.

And also that I have a good feeling about him.

It's complicated.

Yeah, I feel like the games where you townread me early are games where I am universally scum.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #115 on: February 21, 2021, 02:59:16 pm »

Hot take: The people who are sussing mathdude are scummy, because going after the newbie is easy and comes with a lot of built-in deniability.

Vote: MiX
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #116 on: February 21, 2021, 03:08:25 pm »

Hot take: The people who are sussing mathdude are scummy, because going after the newbie is easy and comes with a lot of built-in deniability.

Vote: MiX

I'm townreading the hell out of mathdude, so was that vote supposed to be related to that sentence?

Oh I don't want to exile Robz. Yet.

I just want him to know I have my eye on him.

And also that I have a good feeling about him.

It's complicated.

Yeah, I feel like the games where you townread me early are games where I am universally scum.

What do you mean by "universally"?
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #117 on: February 21, 2021, 03:08:45 pm »

Congratulations on the new book, Rob!!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #118 on: February 21, 2021, 03:11:14 pm »

Hot take: The people who are sussing mathdude are scummy, because going after the newbie is easy and comes with a lot of built-in deniability.

Vote: MiX

I'm townreading the hell out of mathdude, so was that vote supposed to be related to that sentence?

Oh I don't want to exile Robz. Yet.

I just want him to know I have my eye on him.

And also that I have a good feeling about him.

It's complicated.

Yeah, I feel like the games where you townread me early are games where I am universally scum.

What do you mean by "universally"?

Aren't you voting for him? You were as of Space's last vote count.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #119 on: February 21, 2021, 03:15:16 pm »

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.

Aren't you voting for him? You were as of Space's last vote count.

Well I'm not anymore.

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?

Mathdude seems to be contributing in relatively meaningful ways to me.

Yeah, he's doing a good job at supporting people's reads, but I'd rather him have reads of his own. Feels like he's doing a lot of plays, very theatrical.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #120 on: February 21, 2021, 04:07:35 pm »

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.

So this is the same as an RVS vote? Go ahead, though, I like attention.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #121 on: February 21, 2021, 04:10:10 pm »

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.

So this is the same as an RVS vote? Go ahead, though, I like attention.

Well, it was, but it's not anymore. As of right now.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #122 on: February 21, 2021, 04:12:14 pm »

Unvote from RVS.

@mathdude, did you in fact find ashersky scummy? He's the only one so far who has pinged any scum bells for me.

Vote: ashersky.

PPE: Yeah, saw that coming...
Logged

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #123 on: February 21, 2021, 04:33:53 pm »

@mathdude, did you in fact find ashersky scummy? He's the only one so far who has pinged any scum bells for me.

No

Dylan was a shot in the dark (I started with him because he's no longer IC). But his reaction and others' responses seem to tell me it's a good spot to leave my vote for now.
I had no read on ash, so that was purely to look for reactions and responses. It worked. I never intended to leave my vote there, and I think that was obvious.
MiX, something about your defense of ash gives me a slight scum-read. I'll let that sit for now, but I will be watching what you say.
Logged
he/him

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #124 on: February 21, 2021, 04:35:52 pm »

Vote Count 1.2:

Joth (2): MCMC, faust
MCMC (2): SpaceAnenome, Robz888
EFHW (2): WestCoastDidds, MiX
Ashersky (2): gkrieg, EFHW
gkrieg (1): Ashersky
mathdude (1): Dylan32
Dylan32 (1): mathdude
MiX (1): Joth
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #125 on: February 21, 2021, 04:39:09 pm »

Unvote from RVS.

@mathdude, did you in fact find ashersky scummy? He's the only one so far who has pinged any scum bells for me.

Vote: ashersky.

PPE: Yeah, saw that coming...

Ash has not pinged scum bells for me at all. Why do you?
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #126 on: February 21, 2021, 04:54:04 pm »

Hot take: The people who are sussing mathdude are scummy, because going after the newbie is easy and comes with a lot of built-in deniability.

Vote: MiX

Yeah but it's MiX.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #127 on: February 21, 2021, 04:54:18 pm »

Unvote from RVS.

@mathdude, did you in fact find ashersky scummy? He's the only one so far who has pinged any scum bells for me.

Vote: ashersky.

PPE: Yeah, saw that coming...

Ash has not pinged scum bells for me at all. Why do you?

Me neither.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #128 on: February 21, 2021, 10:01:54 pm »

Is "the space gambit" a thing that means SA is mafia?

I don't expect anyone to be convinced.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #129 on: February 21, 2021, 10:30:53 pm »

This game feels comfortably familiar.  That's nice.

I have town reads on MiX and math.  Also, what's with math (the subject) and this forum?

My vote on gkrieg has expired.  He's town.

vote: joth -- most active, posting hot takes, building up early cred.  Could be mafia putting in the work.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #130 on: February 21, 2021, 11:32:37 pm »

This game feels comfortably familiar.  That's nice.

I have town reads on MiX and math.  Also, what's with math (the subject) and this forum?

My vote on gkrieg has expired.  He's town.

vote: joth -- most active, posting hot takes, building up early cred.  Could be mafia putting in the work.

The vote was originally in post 76 here:

Hey gkrieg, were we mafia partners in a previous iteration of this setup?  I have vague recollections of us choosing no PRs and then lying about a bunch of stuff...and of course winning.  (I feel like we win a lot when we are the bad guys.)

Or was that a different setup?

Also, what's it called when you vote someone just for voting you?  Man, it's been a long time since I played.

vote: gkrieg

Here is every gkrieg post since then:

Hey gkrieg, were we mafia partners in a previous iteration of this setup?  I have vague recollections of us choosing no PRs and then lying about a bunch of stuff...and of course winning.  (I feel like we win a lot when we are the bad guys.)

Or was that a different setup?

Also, what's it called when you vote someone just for voting you?  Man, it's been a long time since I played.

vote: gkrieg

Sounds familiar. I agree that it is probably the right choice to not choose many options as scum.

Has gkrieg posted yet?

Yeah, he voted ash, why do you ask?


Was just trying to get a handle on who had shown up. Very little content from him so far, just that one post, so maybe a pressure

vote: gkrieg

is in order.

I’m usually pretty inactive on the weekends by the way.

So was gkrieg town in your mind when you made the vote originally, or did something in those two posts change your mind?
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #131 on: February 22, 2021, 04:43:57 am »

Hot take: The people who are sussing mathdude are scummy, because going after the newbie is easy and comes with a lot of built-in deniability.
This take is about as lukewarm as they come.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #132 on: February 22, 2021, 04:56:34 am »

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.
I'm confused about what the thought is that you had about EFHW.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #133 on: February 22, 2021, 08:13:05 am »

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.
I'm confused about what the thought is that you had about EFHW.

Something along the lines of "You know, EFHW could really be scum this game, she's quiet, I don't want to vote her, so maybe she's scum". To which I followed up with "eh, there's other people that also fit this that are probably better". But since Didds kinda said the first part, I felt like I was at least somewhat right, so I decided to follow up on that first part with a vote.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #134 on: February 22, 2021, 08:32:19 am »

This game feels comfortably familiar.  That's nice.

I have town reads on MiX and math.  Also, what's with math (the subject) and this forum?

My vote on gkrieg has expired.  He's town.

vote: joth -- most active, posting hot takes, building up early cred.  Could be mafia putting in the work.

I haven't commented on the votes on me so far because they seem like noise, but this one is notably bad. Punishing people for putting in the work and rewarding people for lurking is a pretty dumb strategy for scumhunting, not to mention for building a fun community to play mafia with.

Vote: ashersky
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #135 on: February 22, 2021, 08:44:23 am »

I haven't commented on the votes on me so far because they seem like noise, but this one is notably bad. Punishing people for putting in the work and rewarding people for lurking is a pretty dumb strategy for scumhunting, not to mention for building a fun community to play mafia with.

Vote: ashersky
Why do you think this makes ashersky scum? Seems like a policy vote so far.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #136 on: February 22, 2021, 09:49:17 am »

I haven't commented on the votes on me so far because they seem like noise, but this one is notably bad. Punishing people for putting in the work and rewarding people for lurking is a pretty dumb strategy for scumhunting, not to mention for building a fun community to play mafia with.

Vote: ashersky
Why do you think this makes ashersky scum? Seems like a policy vote so far.

1. Scum likes to keep lurkers around; makes it easier to control the game as it goes on and gives easy misexiles later.

2. It’s suspicious that ash switched off of gkrieg despite gkrieg giving him no reason to do so.

3. What’s wrong with a policy vote?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #137 on: February 22, 2021, 10:12:43 am »

I haven't commented on the votes on me so far because they seem like noise, but this one is notably bad. Punishing people for putting in the work and rewarding people for lurking is a pretty dumb strategy for scumhunting, not to mention for building a fun community to play mafia with.

Vote: ashersky
Why do you think this makes ashersky scum? Seems like a policy vote so far.

1. Scum likes to keep lurkers around; makes it easier to control the game as it goes on and gives easy misexiles later.

2. It’s suspicious that ash switched off of gkrieg despite gkrieg giving him no reason to do so.

3. What’s wrong with a policy vote?

1. gkrieg is not a person that you want to keep around, lol.

2. So do you scumread ash?

3. Is it a policy vote?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #138 on: February 22, 2021, 10:59:22 am »

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #139 on: February 22, 2021, 11:04:51 am »

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

I think I made a fairly cromulent case.  They can’t all be the best case ever.

It’s certainly better than your case on me.  I’m more convinced by my case than yours, so I won’t be switching.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #140 on: February 22, 2021, 11:07:20 am »

@dylan

Your post is too long to phone quote.

No, I was never actually reading gkrieg as mafia, it was rvs-lite.

Gkrieg’s initial response to me was the turning point.  Mafia!gkrieg doesn’t like saying what mafia!gkrieg would do.  Not that he won’t, but it’s uncomfortable. 

(All my reads are based on data from what may be years ago at this point, so things may have changed.)
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #141 on: February 22, 2021, 11:10:56 am »

Also, joth misrepresented my case as somehow a general statement to be applied to all players.  It was not.

It’s easy to say I am saying to exile all active players to keep lurkers around as a mafia ploy.  But I’m saying that joth being the most active player is more indicative of mafia!joth than town!joth. 

I never said active=bad.  I said joth being active could be him putting in the work as mafia.  Like when you put way too much salt in a dish because you are so worried you aren’t putting in enough salt.  I think he could be over-salting.

It’s a D1 case.  Not much to it.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #142 on: February 22, 2021, 11:12:10 am »

So, in sum, joth seems to be oversalting, plus misrepresentating my case in his own omgus (that’s the term I wanted before) case against me. 
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #143 on: February 22, 2021, 11:17:16 am »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #144 on: February 22, 2021, 12:42:23 pm »

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

Why can't you answer my questions without AtE?
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #145 on: February 22, 2021, 01:29:52 pm »

@dylan

Your post is too long to phone quote.

No, I was never actually reading gkrieg as mafia, it was rvs-lite.

Gkrieg’s initial response to me was the turning point.  Mafia!gkrieg doesn’t like saying what mafia!gkrieg would do.  Not that he won’t, but it’s uncomfortable. 

(All my reads are based on data from what may be years ago at this point, so things may have changed.)

Huh. That's a way more well-reasoned explanation than I expected. I don't remember his meta well enough to know if it's correct, but it's plausible at least.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #146 on: February 22, 2021, 01:40:43 pm »

Joth's posts #134 and #136 sounded fine to me, because I had the same thought about exiling based on high activity being a generally bad thing and I think getting Ash to clarify that was a good thing. However, I second MiX's question about AtE, because there were only two replies, 1 clarifying question from faust and then MiX being MiX.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #147 on: February 22, 2021, 03:20:35 pm »

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

Why can't you answer my questions without AtE?

Do I think Ash is scum?

Idk. Maybe. My vote is currently on him because that's the best place for it to be IMO.

Is it a policy vote?

No. Except insofar as my policy is to vote for the person I think is most likely to be scum.

It would be pretty easy to persuade me to move my vote if anyone makes a half-decent case on anyone who isn't me.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #148 on: February 22, 2021, 03:22:54 pm »

Ash's responses have begrudgingly impressed me. I forgot how much his play is driven by his understanding of our individual metas.

(I am jealous and impressed because my brain doesn't work that way and I can't possibly keep track of two metas for every person on this forum.)
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #149 on: February 22, 2021, 03:30:44 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #150 on: February 22, 2021, 04:00:23 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

Nah I think that's simply a joth!joth post, you'd think of that at least 5 times before posting it as either alignment. This, however, is a town!joth post.

May I interest you in an EFHW wagon? She tried to deflect my vote very aggressively, this might be (yet another) scum!EFHW game!
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #151 on: February 22, 2021, 04:18:19 pm »

I am in a day of non-stop meetings. So, this is some high overview stuff instead of post-specific replies.

I am giving some squinty side-eye to MiX and Dylan talking about responses that have emotional components in them as a bad thing. The wordsy people use emotion not as a crutch, but as a part of the way we think. Joth's frustration at having his case scrutinized feels way more authentic and compelling to me than if he hadn't frustration, and I don't think that it has an emaotional component is a reason to discount it.

I freaking love Ashersky's description of putting in the work as oversalting. And Joth is right, Ash's reads of individuals and their typical playstyle is enviable.

When I initially voted for EFHW, it was RVS-lite because she was laying low, but in the time since then (page 5 for me) she has leaned into the scumminess, largely in response to MiX.

I am also seeing way less of faust than I'd have expected at this point in the game.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #152 on: February 22, 2021, 04:28:05 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

Nah I think that's simply a joth!joth post, you'd think of that at least 5 times before posting it as either alignment. This, however, is a town!joth post.

May I interest you in an EFHW wagon? She tried to deflect my vote very aggressively, this might be (yet another) scum!EFHW game!

I feel like you're interpreting their post way more aggressively than it sounds to me. I mean, I'm not opposed to building an EFHW wagon, but you haven't given me enough reason to start one yet.

Re: Didds - I didn't say using emotion in this game is a problem. I've had my share of emotional moments and frustration that has bled into my posts before, so I wasn't saying emotion=scummy. The degree of emotion after literally two posts that read to me more like asking questions rather than strong pushback struck me as possibly insincere emotion. His most recent posts have sounded a bit more towny to me though, so I'm willing to accept it was probably genuine.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #153 on: February 22, 2021, 04:31:40 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

"This is what I would do if I was mafia. This is why I'm town because I'm doing this".
In my experience, this is a very scum move, especially this early, without much bandwagon on you. Now, maybe this is typical joth, as MiX and Didds seem to read him as town. But I'm suspicious. It's a very WIFOM thing and could go either way.
Logged
he/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #154 on: February 22, 2021, 04:35:47 pm »

Random thought: the fact that we have both extreme ends of the spectrum here will be interesting throughout the game. Ash: near encyclopedic meta knowledge - mathdude: doesn't know a single player's meta.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #155 on: February 22, 2021, 04:42:07 pm »

re: EFHW: I don't see it. Wish I did, but I don't, and I just reread all her posts.

Unvote

Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #156 on: February 22, 2021, 06:07:03 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

Nah I think that's simply a joth!joth post, you'd think of that at least 5 times before posting it as either alignment. This, however, is a town!joth post.

May I interest you in an EFHW wagon? She tried to deflect my vote very aggressively, this might be (yet another) scum!EFHW game!

Aggressively?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #157 on: February 22, 2021, 06:15:14 pm »

vote: Space. Totally lurking.

I also appreciated ashersky's oversalting metaphor. Not giving a day pass, but willing to move on. It was a nothing case, anyway.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #158 on: February 22, 2021, 06:16:49 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

Nah I think that's simply a joth!joth post, you'd think of that at least 5 times before posting it as either alignment. This, however, is a town!joth post.

May I interest you in an EFHW wagon? She tried to deflect my vote very aggressively, this might be (yet another) scum!EFHW game!

Aggressively?

Well it was clearly a poor choice of words, but they were the ones that popped into my mind, so I thought they would reflect what I was thinking when posting accurately. The post in question is this one:

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.

So this is the same as an RVS vote? Go ahead, though, I like attention.

This is a great way of making me double down, which in turn makes me want to eventually move away from it. It's a very direct approach to my vote in a way that says that you do not want it to be here for long.

You can also read it almost as if it's mocking my vote, baiting me into either accepting that it was a RVS and move away, or stubbornly defend it to the point where it would lose all reasoning. "I like attention." is almost an invitation for people to look at EFHW and her wagon (and my vote), and come back with the conclusion that it is a bad wagon, because at the time it truly was a bad wagon.

vote: Space. Totally lurking.

I also appreciated ashersky's oversalting metaphor. Not giving a day pass, but willing to move on. It was a nothing case, anyway.

Which case was a nothing case? Ash's? Joth's?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #159 on: February 22, 2021, 06:24:18 pm »

Wow. I am incapable of being that crafty.

The nothing case was my vote on ash.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #160 on: February 22, 2021, 06:31:17 pm »

Wow. I am incapable of being that crafty.

The nothing case was my vote on ash.

I don't think so. You might never have done it and never will, but you are not incapable of doing such a thing.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #161 on: February 22, 2021, 07:57:39 pm »

vote: Space. Totally lurking.

I also appreciated ashersky's oversalting metaphor. Not giving a day pass, but willing to move on. It was a nothing case, anyway.

Yeah, sorry! Started a re-read of everyone earlier, but didn't finish it before the evening's social calls, and now it's past bedtime. Still have notes in another tab, but it will have to wait till tomorrow at this point. My sanity is on a lot thinner ground than it was in the beforetimes, so bedtime needs to be that bit more strict :-(
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #162 on: February 22, 2021, 08:11:53 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #163 on: February 22, 2021, 08:34:32 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

I think he's just doing Joth things, including analyzing his own meta fairly obsessively, which seems to be a town Joth thing, if memory serves.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #164 on: February 22, 2021, 08:34:55 pm »

Though admittedly, speaking of metas, mine is to butter up Joth when I am scum!
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #165 on: February 22, 2021, 09:35:15 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

Nah I think that's simply a joth!joth post, you'd think of that at least 5 times before posting it as either alignment. This, however, is a town!joth post.

May I interest you in an EFHW wagon? She tried to deflect my vote very aggressively, this might be (yet another) scum!EFHW game!

The bold is correct, and exactly what I thought when I read it.  I would provide reasoning, which MiX did not, and that is that town!joth often likes to use the "mafia!joth would/would not do X" argument when he defends himself.  Do many other players?  Sure.  But for me it's still a town-ish characteristics for joth.

Honestly, the exasperated tone of the original joth post about how no one was getting scrutiny for votes is a complete null post for joth's alignment.  I saw some reading it as non-towny, but I am firmly convinced that town!joth hates being mis-exiled for any reason and mafia!joth hates being exiled for the wrong reason, and in both cases, his posts read with that same frustration, which rises as the L count goes down.

All that to say, I could be easily convinced to move my vote.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #166 on: February 22, 2021, 09:36:08 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

I think he's just doing Joth things, including analyzing his own meta fairly obsessively, which seems to be a town Joth thing, if memory serves.

I think it's just a joth thing that he cannot avoid.  There may be a difference in how he approaches it depending on alignment, though. 
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #167 on: February 22, 2021, 09:37:45 pm »

So, in sum, joth seems to be oversalting, plus misrepresentating my case in his own omgus (that’s the term I wanted before) case against me.

To be clear, in his posts since I said this, he's said other things that have reduced these feelings.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #168 on: February 22, 2021, 09:39:37 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

"This is what I would do if I was mafia. This is why I'm town because I'm doing this".
In my experience, this is a very scum move, especially this early, without much bandwagon on you. Now, maybe this is typical joth, as MiX and Didds seem to read him as town. But I'm suspicious. It's a very WIFOM thing and could go either way.

I like mathdude's contributions so far.  This is a good post, where a new player is sharing their previous experience and what it may mean, admits their lack of context and knowledge, and makes a clear statement of opinion that can be referenced later when we have more information.

Day pass achieved.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #169 on: February 22, 2021, 09:41:05 pm »

Wow. I am incapable of being that crafty.

Absolutely wrong.  You are very good as misdirection in mafia games.

Not that I see any merit whatsoever in MiX's explanation.  But still, you can be crafty when you want/need.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #170 on: February 22, 2021, 09:41:52 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #171 on: February 22, 2021, 11:29:41 pm »

Vote Count 1.3:

Joth (3): MCMC, faust, Ashersky
MCMC (2): SpaceAnenome, Robz888
EFHW (2): WestCoastDidds, MiX
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
mathdude (1): Dylan32
Dylan32 (1): mathdude
SpaceAnenome (1): EFHW
Not Voting (1): Joth


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #172 on: February 23, 2021, 01:26:09 am »

Vote: mcmc

Is that enough convincing for you, ash?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #173 on: February 23, 2021, 01:32:37 am »

I am giving some squinty side-eye to MiX and Dylan talking about responses that have emotional components in them as a bad thing. The wordsy people use emotion not as a crutch, but as a part of the way we think. Joth's frustration at having his case scrutinized feels way more authentic and compelling to me than if he hadn't frustration, and I don't think that it has an emaotional component is a reason to discount it.
Emotions aren't bad, but it isn't great when people use them to avoid asking questions. Emotional posts are more easily fabricated than actual reasons for the things you're doing.

I am also seeing way less of faust than I'd have expected at this point in the game.
I know right? Though I would argue that the reason is more that the general activity is at a higher level than me being particularly absent.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #174 on: February 23, 2021, 02:52:48 am »

Well, some people are active enough that I could find "reasons" I think pretty much any of them could be scum or reasons any of them could be town.  However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.  Town, we have to carefully use any PR's to make sure the results can be useful not only individually, but also in how the results may interact with those interactions... if that makes any sense.  (Getting a read on someone is helpful... but getting a read on someone that you're fairly certain is connected to another someone can be even more useful).

But now I'm torn between 2 options.  Do we try to vote someone out who we have mild suspicions of, who we can actually connect their reveal-on-exile to the statements made by others about them on day-1?  Or do we just go for the less active lurkers, to make sure they don't just hide through a couple days?

Yeah, sorry! Started a re-read of everyone earlier, but didn't finish it before the evening's social calls, and now it's past bedtime. Still have notes in another tab, but it will have to wait till tomorrow at this point. My sanity is on a lot thinner ground than it was in the beforetimes, so bedtime needs to be that bit more strict :-(

vote: Space
Reason: post more!
Logged
he/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #175 on: February 23, 2021, 03:47:28 am »

Here is another useful interaction:

Vote: mathdude
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #176 on: February 23, 2021, 07:59:10 am »

vote: mathdude

Faust beat me to it.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #177 on: February 23, 2021, 07:59:32 am »

Also, day pass revoked, obviously.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #178 on: February 23, 2021, 10:36:49 am »

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #179 on: February 23, 2021, 10:39:47 am »

... What was scummy about it?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #180 on: February 23, 2021, 10:44:59 am »

... What was scummy about it?
What do you think about it?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #181 on: February 23, 2021, 10:49:47 am »

... What was scummy about it?

Pretty hedgy, keeps option open to exile literally everyone in his first sentence. Over-aware about town PRs and subtly trying to direct their mindset on what to do with their actions. More than 2 calendar days before the deadline and advancing the idea of a lurker policy lynch. Votes for Space seemingly solely because lurker status when in his own words, “there is definitely TONS of useful interactions happening.”

PPE 1
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #182 on: February 23, 2021, 11:29:19 am »

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #183 on: February 23, 2021, 11:32:22 am »

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.
Which of the people on it do you think are scum?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #184 on: February 23, 2021, 11:41:27 am »

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

Wait. Have you even played with Robz before? Since when does he do things D1?

What do you think of mathdude?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #185 on: February 23, 2021, 12:08:01 pm »

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

Wait. Have you even played with Robz before? Since when does he do things D1?

What do you think of mathdude?

The post raised eyebrows but I would not have expected it to garner three votes in rapid succession. The suggestion of directing town PRs pings us as scummy, but it seems like something a new person might not realize was problematic. And the rest of it just seems like a new person who's frustrated with Day 1 and wants to get things rolling, which is a feeling I can very much relate to.

He's on my radar, but I haven't revoked his day pass.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #186 on: February 23, 2021, 12:45:42 pm »

Why even bother giving out a day pass if it can be revoked at any time? Seems like false advertising.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #187 on: February 23, 2021, 12:56:41 pm »

Why even bother giving out a day pass if it can be revoked at any time? Seems like false advertising.

My thought as well!
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #188 on: February 23, 2021, 01:08:30 pm »

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #189 on: February 23, 2021, 01:10:27 pm »

Well, some people are active enough that I could find "reasons" I think pretty much any of them could be scum or reasons any of them could be town.  However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.  Town, we have to carefully use any PR's to make sure the results can be useful not only individually, but also in how the results may interact with those interactions... if that makes any sense.  (Getting a read on someone is helpful... but getting a read on someone that you're fairly certain is connected to another someone can be even more useful).

But now I'm torn between 2 options.  Do we try to vote someone out who we have mild suspicions of, who we can actually connect their reveal-on-exile to the statements made by others about them on day-1?  Or do we just go for the less active lurkers, to make sure they don't just hide through a couple days?

Yeah, sorry! Started a re-read of everyone earlier, but didn't finish it before the evening's social calls, and now it's past bedtime. Still have notes in another tab, but it will have to wait till tomorrow at this point. My sanity is on a lot thinner ground than it was in the beforetimes, so bedtime needs to be that bit more strict :-(

vote: Space
Reason: post more!

This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #190 on: February 23, 2021, 01:11:13 pm »

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

I bolded the part of your comment that is wrong.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #191 on: February 23, 2021, 01:12:00 pm »

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #192 on: February 23, 2021, 01:57:47 pm »

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Ooohhh...... what is off about him, besides the aforementioned man-bun?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #193 on: February 23, 2021, 02:05:21 pm »

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Ooohhh...... what is off about him, besides the aforementioned man-bun?

Can't quite put it into words yet.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #194 on: February 23, 2021, 02:15:56 pm »

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.

I think you are all assuming math is an expert, because he's tried very hard to appear as one. But the truth is he's a new player in terms of knowing the meta here, and you should think of him as such. The super scummy post is incredibly towny because no scum would ever risk posting it. It's probably the most honest post yet, by anyone.

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Who has complained about that, other than yourself?

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Ooohhh...... what is off about him, besides the aforementioned man-bun?

Can't quite put it into words yet.

Who are you voting for, and why?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #195 on: February 23, 2021, 02:45:38 pm »

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.
I'm actually thinking the next one... so whoever places the next vote is scum for sure!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #196 on: February 23, 2021, 02:57:45 pm »

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.

1

I think you are all assuming math is an expert, because he's tried very hard to appear as one. But the truth is he's a new player in terms of knowing the meta here, and you should think of him as such. The super scummy post is incredibly towny because no scum would ever risk posting it. It's probably the most honest post yet, by anyone.

2

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Who has complained about that, other than yourself?

3

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Ooohhh...... what is off about him, besides the aforementioned man-bun?

Can't quite put it into words yet.

Who are you voting for, and why?

The numbers in bold and italics inserted above are to show what parts of your post I'm replying to with the following comments.

1. Interesting to jump in and claim this before we know if this is the whole wagon or if someone else would join in a scummier way later. I could also see a comment like this serving to put a damper on further wagon growth preemptively, which would be helpful if you're partners.

2. I don't know that anyone is treating him like an expert, just an experienced player who has a better grasp on forum mafia than the average new guy that joins us here. Also, claims of too scummy to be scum are usually garbage. Not that they are never true, but I'm inclined to think attributing town points for scummy behavior is just poor play, particularly when you don't have specific personal meta history on the person in question that would suggest it is more consistent with their town self.

3. Joth accused him of two things in the post where he voted Robz, only townreading people and asking simple questions (to paraphrase).

ppe 1 by faust. I take back the second part of point 1, faust's post would do more to stop wagon growth than yours haha.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #197 on: February 23, 2021, 03:56:05 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #198 on: February 23, 2021, 03:59:58 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.

So I'm fishing for wagons, but when the best and most plausible wagon in the game cropped up (mathdude) I decided to ignore it? And I also passed up an opportunity to hop on the EFHW wagon after being explicitly invited to join it?

Are they both my partners? Or am I just really bad at fishing for wagons? :P
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #199 on: February 23, 2021, 04:03:53 pm »

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.

So I'm fishing for wagons, but when the best and most plausible wagon in the game cropped up (mathdude) I decided to ignore it? And I also passed up an opportunity to hop on the EFHW wagon after being explicitly invited to join it?

Are they both my partners? Or am I just really bad at fishing for wagons? :P

Fishing for wagons and joining quickly built wagons are two very different things. I think you are good at fishing for wagons safely and are acutely aware/concerned of the attention joining the math wagon would bring on you.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #200 on: February 23, 2021, 04:06:53 pm »

This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."

Okay, so a bunch of my notes from last night are out of date already, but I'll reformat them soon. This post from Robz pings me as the sort of thing I scumread him for in other games because language like "haven't we actually decided that..." seems to be telling other people how to think in a way that just takes it as given that people will agree with him without him actually having to back it up.

The other thing that's interesting to me is that he's doubled down on his mcmc vote, whereas I opened the post I was writing last night (the one that's sitting in another tab, that  I need to update and post at some point) with the acknowledgement that my mcmc vote was clearly RVS and needed to be updated, and my whole post was just looking at what appeared to be justifiable wagons and at the people driving most of the conversation in-thread at that point.

PPE 2 or 3?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #201 on: February 23, 2021, 04:07:41 pm »

Why even bother giving out a day pass if it can be revoked at any time? Seems like false advertising.

My thought as well!

Because giving out day passes is a fun laze-fair towny thing to do but he also doesn’t want to count out joining a super quick wagon. Once he can think of a good excuse to that is.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #202 on: February 23, 2021, 04:23:44 pm »

This post from Robz pings me as the sort of thing I scumread him for in other games because language like "haven't we actually decided that..." seems to be telling other people how to think in a way that just takes it as given that people will agree with him without him actually having to back it up.

... You know I'm a pundit for a living, right?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #203 on: February 23, 2021, 04:24:19 pm »

In any case I think the points I made in that post were correct.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #204 on: February 23, 2021, 04:25:04 pm »

Vote: Space for being wrong
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #205 on: February 23, 2021, 04:27:47 pm »

This post from Robz pings me as the sort of thing I scumread him for in other games because language like "haven't we actually decided that..." seems to be telling other people how to think in a way that just takes it as given that people will agree with him without him actually having to back it up.

... You know I'm a pundit for a living, right?

Yeah, but there's giving opinions and then there's repackaging stuff for your own agenda. I'm not happy about the latter, because I like my content to be fact based and backed up by evidence. And oddly enough, I'm a research scientist for a living :-)

Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #206 on: February 23, 2021, 04:37:23 pm »

Vote: Space for being wrong

Hehe, the first thought that pops into my head here is that this is exactly the sort of disagreement we've actively talked about wanting to fabricate when we're both on the scumteam, isn't it? Sadly, I can guarantee we're not both scum here because I'm town!

Anyway, I don't think a claim of "we actually decided" anything in a group like this can reasonably be backed up as an open-and-shut case, therefore I'm not really wrong. I'm also not even sure I support the "hedginess isn't scummy" argument, because I think as scum you do have to put in some effort to keep your options open and be able to pivot onto an interesting wagon. At best I'd grant that hedginess in D1 is not usually necessary for scum, since nobody knows what's going on and there are probably plenty of open wagons to jump on.

The other option (which would allow you to claim I'm actually wrong!) is that I'm just not part of the "we" with whom you're agreeing on the thing. It's possible, in that I've only been playing on this site for ~4.5 years, so I'm a relative newbie to the likes of some of you :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #207 on: February 23, 2021, 04:41:10 pm »

Here's a current Space Count:

mathdude (4): Dylan32, faust, ashersky, EFHW
ashersky (1): gkrieg13
mcmcsalot (1): SpaceAnemone
jotheonah (1): mcmcsalot
EFHW (2): WestCoastDidds, MiX
SpaceAnemone (2): mathdude, Robz888
Robz888 (1): jotheonah

The post and word counts (which exclude quoted text) are relevant to something I was doing in last night's post, looking at joth in particular because he was getting heat for being active, so I may as well share these so that anyone else can draw conclusions from them:

Player post counts:
   27 jotheonah (mean 33.4 words/post)
   25 Robz888 (mean 20.8 words/post)
   24 MiX (mean 50.0 words/post)
   19 faust (mean 15.6 words/post)
   19 ashersky (mean 40.9 words/post)
   18 mcmcsalot (mean 33.0 words/post)
   13 EFHW (mean 17.1 words/post)
   13 Dylan32 (mean 83.7 words/post)
   11 WestCoastDidds (mean 53.9 words/post)
   11 mathdude (mean 67.9 words/post)
   8 SpaceAnemone (mean 101.4 words/post)
   3 gkrieg13 (mean 12.0 words/post)

Player word counts:
   1201 MiX
   1088 Dylan32
   902 jotheonah
   811 SpaceAnemone
   778 ashersky
   747 mathdude
   594 mcmcsalot
   593 WestCoastDidds
   519 Robz888
   296 faust
   222 EFHW
   36 gkrieg13
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #208 on: February 23, 2021, 04:49:04 pm »

Vote: Space for being wrong

Hehe, the first thought that pops into my head here is that this is exactly the sort of disagreement we've actively talked about wanting to fabricate when we're both on the scumteam, isn't it? Sadly, I can guarantee we're not both scum here because I'm town!

Anyway, I don't think a claim of "we actually decided" anything in a group like this can reasonably be backed up as an open-and-shut case, therefore I'm not really wrong. I'm also not even sure I support the "hedginess isn't scummy" argument, because I think as scum you do have to put in some effort to keep your options open and be able to pivot onto an interesting wagon. At best I'd grant that hedginess in D1 is not usually necessary for scum, since nobody knows what's going on and there are probably plenty of open wagons to jump on.

The other option (which would allow you to claim I'm actually wrong!) is that I'm just not part of the "we" with whom you're agreeing on the thing. It's possible, in that I've only been playing on this site for ~4.5 years, so I'm a relative newbie to the likes of some of you :-P

A long, long time ago, I thought emojis were scummy!
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #209 on: February 23, 2021, 04:54:32 pm »

Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space

I am finding you quite confusing :-P

Vote: mcmc

Then it’s working! You scum?

I just realised I never responded to this! No, not scum this time round!
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #210 on: February 23, 2021, 05:03:44 pm »

Here's the long set of reasoning I was working on last night, updated for the current game-state:

Robz is contributing more than his bored D1 self often does (he's second on the number-of-posts leader-board, up from third last night), and I'm not sure how to interpret that. Him coming after me now is actually kind of welcome, though, because he's at least giving me something to engage with on my own terms, and everyone knows I have a hard time in D1 when there isn't actually anything to analyse yet (for those of us who're not great with tone or emotion, at least!).

Topping the number-of-posts count is joth, though he's only third on word-count, because his stuff tends to be one-liners. I'm against voting for anyone generating that much interaction if none of it is coming out particularly scummy, though.

Second place on the the number-of-words count is Dylan, even though he's way down the list on the number-of-posts, because I'm the only one who beats Dylan in words-per-post usually :-P I feel like I'm broadly in agreement with most of their posts, and there's actual scum-hunting sort of content, so all good there. It's also nice to see mathdude also creeping up there in terms of being someone who makes wordy posts.

MiX tops the word count and is second-place in number of posts, and is pretty classic overconfident and slightly demanding MiX. Though the newbie-helping is good; I'd have been trying to be helpful there except MiX generally got in before me with things like the new community standards of not using "lynch" language, and in making sure the civility pledge was signed and stuff :-)

Word-sparse players are gkrieg, faust and EFHW, which is not too unsurprising. Ash sounds really agreeable and not at all scummy, which for me is a big departure from the norm. But voting someone because I feel they're being uncharacteristic in making me agree with them would be very backwards, so let's not go there.

Who does that leave? Mcmc and Didds are very middle-of-the-road in terms of numbers of posts and numbers of words. I recall rea-reading Didds and thinking that she's not really being any more fluffy that usual, and has some opinions in there. Mcmc started out quite low-content (except where the man-bun is involved!) for about the first half of his posts to date, but then they got actually quite content-full.

In fact, mcmc really does seem to double down on his case against Joth, even though he acknowledged that Joth is posting a lot. I think that's a weird thing to push a D1 wagon on. And meanwhile he's also throwing shade at Ash on the side for the revoked daypass. So yeah, my big post of exploring where to move my vote to has apparently concluded that I'm okay leaving it on mcmc.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #211 on: February 23, 2021, 05:04:43 pm »

A long, long time ago, I thought emojis were scummy!

See, that's the kind of opinion I like. Self-contained, and not phrased as if everyone would be wrong to disagree with you :-)
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #212 on: February 23, 2021, 05:42:41 pm »

Emojis are awesome. As are any and all in-game memes. Also ❤️ You all

I appreciate the impressions post, Space. I’ve been scattered this week with post-ice storm fall out and haven’t been able to gather my thoughts.

I was surprised, well maybe that’s the wrong word, at how little we’ve heard from gkrieg. I get being scarce on the weekends, but uhm...it’s Tuesday.

I’m totally here for more engaged Robz, though. And all the ways that what we do for money is evident in our play.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #213 on: February 23, 2021, 05:48:32 pm »

This post from Robz pings me as the sort of thing I scumread him for in other games because language like "haven't we actually decided that..." seems to be telling other people how to think in a way that just takes it as given that people will agree with him without him actually having to back it up.

... You know I'm a pundit for a living, right?

You’re not that kind of pundit. You hate that kind of pundit. Every other piece of yours I read is calling out bad takes and hypocrisy.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #214 on: February 23, 2021, 06:03:13 pm »

   25 Robz888 (mean 20.8 words/post)
   24 MiX (mean 50.0 words/post)

This is almost an insult. On the other hand, a post I was writing just got deleted, so I'm really not in the mood to fix this.

@Dylan: 1. Yeah, I did want people off the math wagon, because I'm townreading him. 2. It's scummy if you assume he has a meta where doing that would be scum aligned. The post itself is simply brutally honest, which pings off scummy, but it's not a scum play.

Vote: Space for being wrong

Can you explain this, and your previous vote, with more detail?

In fact, mcmc really does seem to double down on his case against Joth, even though he acknowledged that Joth is posting a lot. I think that's a weird thing to push a D1 wagon on. And meanwhile he's also throwing shade at Ash on the side for the revoked daypass. So yeah, my big post of exploring where to move my vote to has apparently concluded that I'm okay leaving it on mcmc.

At the end of the first 2 sentences, I would've assumed you were townreading the heck out of mcmc.

This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."

Okay, so a bunch of my notes from last night are out of date already, but I'll reformat them soon. This post from Robz pings me as the sort of thing I scumread him for in other games because language like "haven't we actually decided that..." seems to be telling other people how to think in a way that just takes it as given that people will agree with him without him actually having to back it up.

The other thing that's interesting to me is that he's doubled down on his mcmc vote, whereas I opened the post I was writing last night (the one that's sitting in another tab, that  I need to update and post at some point) with the acknowledgement that my mcmc vote was clearly RVS and needed to be updated, and my whole post was just looking at what appeared to be justifiable wagons and at the people driving most of the conversation in-thread at that point.

PPE 2 or 3?

The quoted post doesn't actually matter, it's not part of an argument as far as I can tell.

A long, long time ago, I thought emojis were scummy!

See, that's the kind of opinion I like. Self-contained, and not phrased as if everyone would be wrong to disagree with you :-)

Is this towny, scummy, nully, or something else entirely?


I feel like I have more thoughts, just not the will to write them.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #215 on: February 23, 2021, 06:17:46 pm »

Vote Count 1.4:
mathdude (4): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, EFHW
SpaceAnenome (2): mathdude, Robz888
EFHW (2): WestCoastDidds, MiX
MCMC (1): SpaceAnenome
Joth (1): MCMC
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
Robz888 (1): Joth
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #216 on: February 23, 2021, 06:50:39 pm »

In fact, mcmc really does seem to double down on his case against Joth, even though he acknowledged that Joth is posting a lot. I think that's a weird thing to push a D1 wagon on. And meanwhile he's also throwing shade at Ash on the side for the revoked daypass. So yeah, my big post of exploring where to move my vote to has apparently concluded that I'm okay leaving it on mcmc.

At the end of the first 2 sentences, I would've assumed you were townreading the heck out of mcmc.

If that is true then you'd be reading me backwards, I think. In a scum!mcmc world, in which he's finding reasons to vote joth but is then called on it, the two leading options are either to find another sham reason to vote another player (not too easy in early game where we don't have strong suspicions on anyone yet), or to turn up the apparent volume on the existing suspicion and double down on it while sounding convincing.

Given my own reading of the situation, I just think there's too little evidence around to be that sure of it. Then there's a strong bias against voting someone who's actually active in the game. So to start writing posts that sound more certain just feels like there's a risk that there's other motivation involved.

Now your turn. Why does it sound like that would be a townie narrative instead of a scummy one for mcmc?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #217 on: February 23, 2021, 06:57:57 pm »

This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."

Okay, so a bunch of my notes from last night are out of date already, but I'll reformat them soon. This post from Robz pings me as the sort of thing I scumread him for in other games because language like "haven't we actually decided that..." seems to be telling other people how to think in a way that just takes it as given that people will agree with him without him actually having to back it up.

The other thing that's interesting to me is that he's doubled down on his mcmc vote, whereas I opened the post I was writing last night (the one that's sitting in another tab, that  I need to update and post at some point) with the acknowledgement that my mcmc vote was clearly RVS and needed to be updated, and my whole post was just looking at what appeared to be justifiable wagons and at the people driving most of the conversation in-thread at that point.

PPE 2 or 3?

The quoted post doesn't actually matter, it's not part of an argument as far as I can tell.

What a strange observation to make. What caused you decide that's a useful thing to post right now, given that you ended your post with a suggestion that you have more useful things to say but no will to say them?

Robz's post mattered to Robz enough to make it, and he's very clearly trying to steer people away from voting for mathdude.

My post mattered because I used it to say that I scumread that sort of manipulation, and I felt it was relevant to point it out there, even if only for future reference in terms of mathdude-Robz interaction for the later game.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #218 on: February 23, 2021, 07:03:59 pm »

I guess I should also also clarify that I'm not really scumreading mathdude right now, though I'm happy to be suspicious of people going too far out of their way to try to divert his wagon, and to keep an eye on his interactions accordingly.

I think it's polite to give newbies a daypass, unless they do something outright scummy, because we're a community of players and it can be really tough for the first game or two, so letting them accrue experience that bit faster is probably helpful. Plus, mathdude seems to be willing enough to post his thinking out loud and engage it conversation, and I think a newbie scum trying for a high level of engagement will be at least as catchable later on as now.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #219 on: February 23, 2021, 07:44:03 pm »

I guess I should also also clarify that I'm not really scumreading mathdude right now, though I'm happy to be suspicious of people going too far out of their way to try to divert his wagon, and to keep an eye on his interactions accordingly.
--snip--

Yeah, a whole lot of people have jumped in to defend mathdude before we even got a chance to see him respond to the wagon himself. I mean, I get that the one post isn't a sure thing like a true scumslip or anything and he could still be town, but it was a scummier post than a lot of other things that have garnered votes to this point, so I feel like town should have been a little slower to defend it this early in the wagon. It's middle of D1 and this was only the 2nd wagon to even hit 3 people (using the official VCs as reference; Joth's hit 3, MiX moved, then Ash joined to put it back on 3 before moving to mathdude).
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #220 on: February 23, 2021, 07:53:02 pm »

Here's the long set of reasoning I was working on last night, updated for the current game-state:

Robz is contributing more than his bored D1 self often does (he's second on the number-of-posts leader-board, up from third last night), and I'm not sure how to interpret that. Him coming after me now is actually kind of welcome, though, because he's at least giving me something to engage with on my own terms, and everyone knows I have a hard time in D1 when there isn't actually anything to analyse yet (for those of us who're not great with tone or emotion, at least!).

Topping the number-of-posts count is joth, though he's only third on word-count, because his stuff tends to be one-liners. I'm against voting for anyone generating that much interaction if none of it is coming out particularly scummy, though.

Second place on the the number-of-words count is Dylan, even though he's way down the list on the number-of-posts, because I'm the only one who beats Dylan in words-per-post usually :-P I feel like I'm broadly in agreement with most of their posts, and there's actual scum-hunting sort of content, so all good there. It's also nice to see mathdude also creeping up there in terms of being someone who makes wordy posts.

MiX tops the word count and is second-place in number of posts, and is pretty classic overconfident and slightly demanding MiX. Though the newbie-helping is good; I'd have been trying to be helpful there except MiX generally got in before me with things like the new community standards of not using "lynch" language, and in making sure the civility pledge was signed and stuff :-)

Word-sparse players are gkrieg, faust and EFHW, which is not too unsurprising. Ash sounds really agreeable and not at all scummy, which for me is a big departure from the norm. But voting someone because I feel they're being uncharacteristic in making me agree with them would be very backwards, so let's not go there.

Who does that leave? Mcmc and Didds are very middle-of-the-road in terms of numbers of posts and numbers of words. I recall rea-reading Didds and thinking that she's not really being any more fluffy that usual, and has some opinions in there. Mcmc started out quite low-content (except where the man-bun is involved!) for about the first half of his posts to date, but then they got actually quite content-full.

In fact, mcmc really does seem to double down on his case against Joth, even though he acknowledged that Joth is posting a lot. I think that's a weird thing to push a D1 wagon on. And meanwhile he's also throwing shade at Ash on the side for the revoked daypass. So yeah, my big post of exploring where to move my vote to has apparently concluded that I'm okay leaving it on mcmc.

I actually mostly agree with this post, so Unvote
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #221 on: February 23, 2021, 08:31:56 pm »

I guess I should also also clarify that I'm not really scumreading mathdude right now, though I'm happy to be suspicious of people going too far out of their way to try to divert his wagon, and to keep an eye on his interactions accordingly.
--snip--

Yeah, a whole lot of people have jumped in to defend mathdude before we even got a chance to see him respond to the wagon himself. I mean, I get that the one post isn't a sure thing like a true scumslip or anything and he could still be town, but it was a scummier post than a lot of other things that have garnered votes to this point, so I feel like town should have been a little slower to defend it this early in the wagon. It's middle of D1 and this was only the 2nd wagon to even hit 3 people (using the official VCs as reference; Joth's hit 3, MiX moved, then Ash joined to put it back on 3 before moving to mathdude).

I think it's sort of disingenuous to imply that anyone who has chosen not to vote for mathdude, and explained that choice, is defending him.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #222 on: February 23, 2021, 08:47:44 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #223 on: February 23, 2021, 08:48:57 pm »

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

This post is doing exactly what you accuse Robz of doing in this post.  That is, less-than-robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #224 on: February 23, 2021, 08:53:25 pm »

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

Wait. Have you even played with Robz before? Since when does he do things D1?

What do you think of mathdude?

This is even more inexplicable.  Asking if joth is familiar with/has played mafia with Robz is like asking if Gollum is familiar with that one ring.

MiX has been around long enough to know better.  Not sure what it means, though.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #225 on: February 23, 2021, 08:54:28 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #226 on: February 23, 2021, 08:56:07 pm »

Why even bother giving out a day pass if it can be revoked at any time? Seems like false advertising.

All sorts of stuff can be revoked at any time.  Day pass, friendship, Paris Agreement membership, title of Sexiest Man Alive according to People Magazine...

Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #227 on: February 23, 2021, 08:59:36 pm »

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.

I think you are all assuming math is an expert, because he's tried very hard to appear as one. But the truth is he's a new player in terms of knowing the meta here, and you should think of him as such. The super scummy post is incredibly towny because no scum would ever risk posting it. It's probably the most honest post yet, by anyone.

This is the actual definition of MiX's style of play.  Literally making up a thing to make his top mafia read look worse.  You built a "worst place on the wagon" argument around EFHW's vote being the most recent, after you have been quasi-tunneling them for the day.  It is a bad argument, and you should apologize for making it.

It is, unfortunately, not alignment-indicative for MiX.  It's MiX-indicative.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #228 on: February 23, 2021, 09:03:29 pm »

I'm having a zoom scotch night with my father, brother, uncle and cousin so... drunk AMA is in effect.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #229 on: February 23, 2021, 09:04:40 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

A new player?

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

Wait. Have you even played with Robz before? Since when does he do things D1?

What do you think of mathdude?

This is even more inexplicable.  Asking if joth is familiar with/has played mafia with Robz is like asking if Gollum is familiar with that one ring.

MiX has been around long enough to know better.  Not sure what it means, though.

It's a rhetorical question. The first one that is, the others are not.

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.

Wait, what, didn't you vote mathdude before? Why is this now a better vote if the post its based on is the same? Correct me if I'm wrong.

Why even bother giving out a day pass if it can be revoked at any time? Seems like false advertising.

All sorts of stuff can be revoked at any time.  Day pass, friendship, Paris Agreement membership, title of Sexiest Man Alive according to People Magazine...

They kinda lose meaning if you revoke them quickly too many times.

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.

I think you are all assuming math is an expert, because he's tried very hard to appear as one. But the truth is he's a new player in terms of knowing the meta here, and you should think of him as such. The super scummy post is incredibly towny because no scum would ever risk posting it. It's probably the most honest post yet, by anyone.

This is the actual definition of MiX's style of play.  Literally making up a thing to make his top mafia read look worse.  You built a "worst place on the wagon" argument around EFHW's vote being the most recent, after you have been quasi-tunneling them for the day.  It is a bad argument, and you should apologize for making it.

It is, unfortunately, not alignment-indicative for MiX.  It's MiX-indicative.

I don't think you should look for scum in the scummiest place in the wagon :P, it was just a coincidence, and also something to look at later. The argument wasn't that the vote was recent, it's that I believe it was the fourth vote, which is the middle of the wagon.

I will apologize though, it shouldn't had sounded like an argument, and I'm sorry about that. I'm not really in my game today.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #230 on: February 23, 2021, 09:08:35 pm »

Time for a pops thing.

Would exile: mathdude, Robz, mcmc

Would not stop the exile of: joth, MiX, Space, EFHW, WCD

Do not want to exile: gkrieg, faust, dylan

That's way more null reads than I prefer, and I feel like I probably shoehorned at least one player into the would exile pile just to avoid even more null.

For reasoning, the mathdude stuff I've said.  I generally find that if the Brothers KaraMcRobz are buddying each other, they are often not of the same alignment.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #231 on: February 23, 2021, 09:08:50 pm »

Quote
Wait, what, didn't you vote mathdude before? Why is this now a better vote if the post its based on is the same? Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're wrong. I expressed tentative hypothetical support for the wagon but have not joined it before now.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #232 on: February 23, 2021, 09:09:41 pm »

Brothers KaraMcRobz

This is very good.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #233 on: February 23, 2021, 09:17:03 pm »

In fact, mcmc really does seem to double down on his case against Joth, even though he acknowledged that Joth is posting a lot. I think that's a weird thing to push a D1 wagon on. And meanwhile he's also throwing shade at Ash on the side for the revoked daypass. So yeah, my big post of exploring where to move my vote to has apparently concluded that I'm okay leaving it on mcmc.

At the end of the first 2 sentences, I would've assumed you were townreading the heck out of mcmc.

Now your turn. Why does it sound like that would be a townie narrative instead of a scummy one for mcmc?

Doubling down on the joth case is townie, and even if you disagree with that, acknowledging that joth's active doesn't make it scummier. Weird things to push a D1 wagon on come from town, not scum. Throwing shade on ash when basically everyone townread him is not a scum move, and it's not easy either.

This kinda took too much inspiration from what you said but I'm tired.

The quoted post doesn't actually matter, it's not part of an argument as far as I can tell.

What a strange observation to make. What caused you decide that's a useful thing to post right now, given that you ended your post with a suggestion that you have more useful things to say but no will to say them?

Robz's post mattered to Robz enough to make it, and he's very clearly trying to steer people away from voting for mathdude.

My post mattered because I used it to say that I scumread that sort of manipulation, and I felt it was relevant to point it out there, even if only for future reference in terms of mathdude-Robz interaction for the later game.

I decided to post it because I thought about it, and it seemed relevant. I didn't say other things because I couldn't remember them anymore.

I think "isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago" makes it so whatever Robz was saying look like a joke. Personally, I took it as "it's not super townie, and it might look scummy, but I don't think so, because the scumminess is the hedginess, and hedginess isn't scummy", which essentially means "I think it's slightly townie" with some weak reasoning behind it.

Your post matters, but I think you're giving too much relevance to the way Robz said it, since what he was arguing was really not something scum would need to manipulate people into agreeing with. I...think I want to write another sentence, but my brain just shutoff for today.


By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.
Logged

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #234 on: February 23, 2021, 09:31:48 pm »

Wow, just wow.  Disappear for 18 hours (a bit of sleep, a busy day teaching... you know, IRL stuffs), and the thread lights up... against me!  Ok, I'm here.  There is a lot to reply to.  Let's see where this goes.

My last post, made around 3am last night:

Well, some people are active enough that I could find "reasons" I think pretty much any of them could be scum or reasons any of them could be town.  However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.  Town, we have to carefully use any PR's to make sure the results can be useful not only individually, but also in how the results may interact with those interactions... if that makes any sense.  (Getting a read on someone is helpful... but getting a read on someone that you're fairly certain is connected to another someone can be even more useful).

But now I'm torn between 2 options.  Do we try to vote someone out who we have mild suspicions of, who we can actually connect their reveal-on-exile to the statements made by others about them on day-1?  Or do we just go for the less active lurkers, to make sure they don't just hide through a couple days?

vote: Space
Reason: post more!

It made sense to me last night.  Reading it again, I can see some of the fuss about it.  I was trying to get out a bunch of thoughts, but they are coming across different now as I read them while a little more awake.  Also, I felt I hadn't contributed much in a day or two, so I started posting the little I was thinking.  (I'll comment on a few of the statements below, replying to others who have quoted or referenced my post, as they raise the issues with my post that I now see as reading "off").

Here's a current Space Count:
---(snip)---
{really long post, lot of numbers}

These facts that Space worked out are constantly being considered in my head (hence "mathdude"), though I didn't have the time or desire to go back through 7+ pages of posts to figure it out on my phone in bed last night.  I really appreciate the numbers though, Space!  It pretty much lines up with what I was noticing.  And not knowing your whole group or individual metas, these numbers are about all I have to work with at the moment.

Oh, also, obviously (now that you are contributing meaningful posts)...
unvote

Here is another useful interaction:

Vote: mathdude

vote: mathdude

Faust beat me to it.

Thanks.  These make sense.  And boy did they get the ball rolling.

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

This is opportunistic... a bit.  I see it now - it does read a bit scummy.  But you do what you have to do.  I have played elsewhere.  I'm not a mafia newbie.  I can say you're heading down the wrong path here though.  I'm very much town.

... What was scummy about it?

Pretty hedgy, keeps option open to exile literally everyone in his first sentence. Over-aware about town PRs and subtly trying to direct their mindset on what to do with their actions. More than 2 calendar days before the deadline and advancing the idea of a lurker policy lynch. Votes for Space seemingly solely because lurker status when in his own words, “there is definitely TONS of useful interactions happening.”

At least you have a reason for jumping on the train.  Now, just as I don't know all of you, you don't know me.  Keeping an option open to exile anyone day-1 just makes sense to me at this point in a game.   And being aware of PRs is also me.  Probably as I get to know you guys, I'll do a little more thinking in my head about PRs on day-1, and save the actual discussion for day 2 or 3, when we can actually gather information from them.  I just wanted to (as you point out) "subtly" let you guys know I was thinking about them.  I will have questions about them - possibly towards the end of day-1, or definitely on day-2 as info is revealed.  I know about power roles, but I want to make sure I understand how exactly they work and are treated here (as it may be slightly different than what I'm used to).

Also, I'm definitely a fan of kicking intentional lurkers.  If we see people lurking but not contributing, that's one thing.  If people are just busy IRL, that's another.  And I don't know which is which at this point, but the "Space Count" and Space's analysis definitely helped me a bit there.

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

I think I've addressed most of this in response to Dylan's posts above.  But this is definitely very opportunistic.  I mean, it is vote 4 of 7 required.  But it's also the highest vote count we've gotten yet.  I post honestly.  I post my thoughts.  I'm not worried, in general, about whether a post of mine "would out scum!him" (scum!me).  My thoughts are real, regardless of whether town or mafia.  I am town here, but I don't think my post would be much different even if I was mafia - again, as I've said, I've played this before.

This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."

Thanks.  These are some things I'm trying to say in all these replies above (but you use much fewer words to say them!)

I guess I should also also clarify that I'm not really scumreading mathdude right now, though I'm happy to be suspicious of people going too far out of their way to try to divert his wagon, and to keep an eye on his interactions accordingly.

I think it's polite to give newbies a daypass, unless they do something outright scummy, because we're a community of players and it can be really tough for the first game or two, so letting them accrue experience that bit faster is probably helpful. Plus, mathdude seems to be willing enough to post his thinking out loud and engage it conversation, and I think a newbie scum trying for a high level of engagement will be at least as catchable later on as now.

I understand the politeness you guys are talking about.  Playing in the past, we had to be careful not to "scare away the newbies".  No worries here.  I won't disappear if you exile me.  I may not pay as close of attention to the thread if I'm not in the game, which means I won't get to know your play styles as much.  But play the game as if I've been here for a few games already.

Yeah, a whole lot of people have jumped in to defend mathdude before we even got a chance to see him respond to the wagon himself. I mean, I get that the one post isn't a sure thing like a true scumslip or anything and he could still be town, but it was a scummier post than a lot of other things that have garnered votes to this point, so I feel like town should have been a little slower to defend it this early in the wagon. It's middle of D1 and this was only the 2nd wagon to even hit 3 people (using the official VCs as reference; Joth's hit 3, MiX moved, then Ash joined to put it back on 3 before moving to mathdude).

I actually agree with you here.  I'm at least as leery of those strongly defending me as I am of those attacking me.  (Now, remember how I post here guys... this is not "I think you all are scum", as before.  This is just saying I'm not so sure about any of this... again/still).  And yes, here I am now, responding to the wagon myself finally.

Back to Space's post now...

Here's a current Space Count:

--(snip - vote count not relevant to my reply)---

The post and word counts (which exclude quoted text) are relevant to something I was doing in last night's post, looking at joth in particular because he was getting heat for being active, so I may as well share these so that anyone else can draw conclusions from them:

Player post counts:
   27 jotheonah (mean 33.4 words/post)
   25 Robz888 (mean 20.8 words/post)
   24 MiX (mean 50.0 words/post)
   19 faust (mean 15.6 words/post)
   19 ashersky (mean 40.9 words/post)
   18 mcmcsalot (mean 33.0 words/post)
   13 EFHW (mean 17.1 words/post)
   13 Dylan32 (mean 83.7 words/post)
   11 WestCoastDidds (mean 53.9 words/post)
   11 mathdude (mean 67.9 words/post)
   8 SpaceAnemone (mean 101.4 words/post)
   3 gkrieg13 (mean 12.0 words/post)

Player word counts:
   1201 MiX
   1088 Dylan32
   902 jotheonah
   811 SpaceAnemone
   778 ashersky
   747 mathdude
   594 mcmcsalot
   593 WestCoastDidds
   519 Robz888
   296 faust
   222 EFHW
   36 gkrieg13

I like these ranked lists.  Total posts is one thing, but is mostly indicative of the person's play/post style in the game... sort of meta info, not necessarily useful for this game (unless someone usually posts a lot and are mostly lurking now).  Total word count is a combination of personal play/post style and engagement in this game.  But I'm actually looking more at the mean (average) words/post.  This helps me get to know you guys, in a nice, summarized way, rather than going back through 9+ pages of replies multiple times.

From one extreme to another, there is gkrieg at 12 words/post to Space over 100.   I knew before Space started the recent posts, both Space and gkrieg were low (on both posts and mean words/post, which also meant total words), but I didn't realize how low gkrieg was.  I could have poked either, really.  I poked Space.  It generated discussion.  I'm glad.  But what's up with gkrieg - is this typical?  Is it even remotely helpful?  Should I have poked gkrieg?  Should I now?

So how's that now?  Have I addressed the concerns some of you have?  Now let's drop the silly votes against me and move onto something actually helpful for day-1.  The things I posted last night I did intentionally.  I wrote what I did, and I wouldn't take them back.  Maybe I should have been a little more diplomatic in how I said them, and may have if I was not half asleep.  But I still stand by what I said, and hopefully now with this long post, some of it makes a little more sense.

PPE - I see a lot more posts that have happened since I started this one.  Rather than responding here (and delaying this post), it appears I need to get it posted, and reply to the new ones in a new one myself.
Logged
he/him

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #235 on: February 23, 2021, 09:58:24 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

That's a good question.  2 others have already responded, but I will too (respond to quoting one of their responses below).  But I am trying to figure out why you think that I think I will definitely not die at night.  The best guess I have is this:

However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.

Was that it?  This is a statement to all town in general.  Even if I'm not here, it still bodes well for us, especially now with how much people have jumped into these discussions.

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.

Compelling?  Or a convenient way to not think about what's actually going on?

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

A new player?

I did get the impression from some people's posts that there's a reasonable chance I'd get a "day pass".  As I said before, don't consider me the new guy.  Assume I've been here a few games.  But I may have used this impression to post my thoughts just a little more freely than I may have otherwise done - I did this though, to try and show who I am, and try the be as helpful as I can be.

Do not want to exile: gkrieg, faust, dylan

Why do you not want to exile gkrieg?  Haven't posted anything scummy?  That's because has hardly posted anything at all.

By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.

EFHW... and joth too, IMO.
Logged
he/him

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #236 on: February 23, 2021, 10:24:51 pm »

Sorry been busy. Read through tomorrow incoming.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #237 on: February 23, 2021, 11:19:35 pm »

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.

mathdude's defense makes sense if you read the offending post as written by someone who is super tired. I'm going to suspend judgement on him for now.

I'm confused about how I am the largest wagon.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #238 on: February 24, 2021, 12:16:20 am »

By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.

So EFHW is E-1?

vote: EFHW

vote: mathdude
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #239 on: February 24, 2021, 12:16:40 am »

Also, if that moves my mathdude vote, it throws off MiX's wagon placement arguments.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #240 on: February 24, 2021, 12:18:52 am »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

That's a good question.  2 others have already responded, but I will too (respond to quoting one of their responses below).  But I am trying to figure out why you think that I think I will definitely not die at night.  The best guess I have is this:

However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.

Was that it?  This is a statement to all town in general.  Even if I'm not here, it still bodes well for us, especially now with how much people have jumped into these discussions.

It was partly that, if you want to choose specific words and combinations of words that convey why I had the impression that you thought you would not die at night.

It was more my impression from reading the post in its entirety, that you expected to be playing on Day 2 and available to do the things you said we'd be able to do (like get info from PRs).
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #241 on: February 24, 2021, 12:35:54 am »

At least you have a reason for jumping on the train.  Now, just as I don't know all of you, you don't know me.  Keeping an option open to exile anyone day-1 just makes sense to me at this point in a game.   And being aware of PRs is also me.  Probably as I get to know you guys, I'll do a little more thinking in my head about PRs on day-1, and save the actual discussion for day 2 or 3, when we can actually gather information from them.  I just wanted to (as you point out) "subtly" let you guys know I was thinking about them.  I will have questions about them - possibly towards the end of day-1, or definitely on day-2 as info is revealed.  I know about power roles, but I want to make sure I understand how exactly they work and are treated here (as it may be slightly different than what I'm used to).

Also, I'm definitely a fan of kicking intentional lurkers.  If we see people lurking but not contributing, that's one thing.  If people are just busy IRL, that's another.  And I don't know which is which at this point, but the "Space Count" and Space's analysis definitely helped me a bit there.

Snipping what I read as the most useful part of your very long defense.

As a general rule, I would warn that there is no reason for you to assume that there will be any information to be had on subsequent days from power roles in any game.  People don't share, people miss, people die, etc.

In this game, I really feel like you are hurting yourself here.  This focus on PRs (which I didn't read as much of in the original post that got all this started but do see here a lot) and their possible information and role to be played in future days has basically put you in the mafia OR town PR category at this point.  That's bad for a multitude of reasons.  I'll try to lay it out as best I can:

--your previous post and this post both share a lot of assumptions regarding PR play, usage, and -- most importantly here -- existence.  As a semi-closed setup, part of a PR's protection is the hidden nature of that role.  The players here who are more likely to think PRs exist and will be contributing something are, you guessed it, the PRs themselves and the mafia who know how many PRs exist.
--while you can (and probably will) argue that your posts are about mafia games in general, it is difficult to believe that what you write in this game thread is not about this game.
--so, your confidence in the way we will "gather information" from the PRs will take part in this game in Day 2 and beyond makes me think you have more information that a VT would -- so either mafia or a PR.
--your mention of sharing information leans more toward specific roles: in this setup, the Role Cop, Goon Cop, and Tracker.  A no kill means the Roleblocker might have something to say, as well.  The Bodyguard, for example, would have no information to share.
--can you say that you just meant "gather information" from whatever we see (i.e., bodyguard death, no kill, two kills, etc.)?  Sure.  But that's not a surefire defense, nor will I be inclined to believe it.

So, I see two distinct possibilities:

#1: You are mafia, expect to live through the night because what are the chances a vig exists AND shoots the "newbie" and therefore slipped.
#2: You are a PR, probably one that gets results (Goon Cop or Tracker) and PR slipped (or breadcrumbed badly), which means you, or the possible bodyguard who protects you, dies.

Is #2 the worst?  Maybe not.  You get a result of some sort and survive IF there is a bodyguard.  Chances aren't my forte, so someone who does math can figure that out.  But #2 is still very bad.

There is a #3, which is an f.ds staple, where you are a VT purposefully angling for the NK to protect others.  In that case, you still end up getting the Bodyguard killed, if they exist.

So anyway, that's a deeper look into why I think exiling you makes sense, as I see #1 to be more likely than #2.  (I think PRs are more careful about not slipping information that would give themselves away on D1.)
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #242 on: February 24, 2021, 12:40:44 am »

The TLDR version:

I think mathdude slipped that they are either mafia or a PR.  My bet is most likely mafia, possibly role cop given the "gather information" focus.

(An aside: If I am right about role cop, mafia selected as least one power, and if they took role cop, I'd say they took at least two more.  That's all conjecture though, with no evidence.)

If they're town, they have a PR that gets a result, like Goon Cop or maybe Tracker.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #243 on: February 24, 2021, 01:47:50 am »

Well you have certainly been busy! I'll try to give some comments as I catch up.

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.
Is fishing for wagons a bad thing?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #244 on: February 24, 2021, 01:49:46 am »

Vote: Space for being wrong

Hehe, the first thought that pops into my head here is that this is exactly the sort of disagreement we've actively talked about wanting to fabricate when we're both on the scumteam, isn't it? Sadly, I can guarantee we're not both scum here because I'm town!
This is some next-level distancing!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #245 on: February 24, 2021, 01:52:32 am »

Word-sparse players are gkrieg, faust and EFHW, which is not too unsurprising.
"not too unsurprising" is hard for me to parse... though I feel like you mean "not too surprising"?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #246 on: February 24, 2021, 02:00:27 am »

I guess I should also also clarify that I'm not really scumreading mathdude right now, though I'm happy to be suspicious of people going too far out of their way to try to divert his wagon, and to keep an eye on his interactions accordingly.
--snip--

Yeah, a whole lot of people have jumped in to defend mathdude before we even got a chance to see him respond to the wagon himself. I mean, I get that the one post isn't a sure thing like a true scumslip or anything and he could still be town, but it was a scummier post than a lot of other things that have garnered votes to this point, so I feel like town should have been a little slower to defend it this early in the wagon. It's middle of D1 and this was only the 2nd wagon to even hit 3 people (using the official VCs as reference; Joth's hit 3, MiX moved, then Ash joined to put it back on 3 before moving to mathdude).
I find myself agreeing with Dylan a lot. This is another good post.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #247 on: February 24, 2021, 02:03:26 am »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.
Joke's  on you; we know you're scum now!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #248 on: February 24, 2021, 02:04:31 am »

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.

I think you are all assuming math is an expert, because he's tried very hard to appear as one. But the truth is he's a new player in terms of knowing the meta here, and you should think of him as such. The super scummy post is incredibly towny because no scum would ever risk posting it. It's probably the most honest post yet, by anyone.

This is the actual definition of MiX's style of play.  Literally making up a thing to make his top mafia read look worse.  You built a "worst place on the wagon" argument around EFHW's vote being the most recent, after you have been quasi-tunneling them for the day.  It is a bad argument, and you should apologize for making it.

It is, unfortunately, not alignment-indicative for MiX.  It's MiX-indicative.
Yes, yes, the confirmation bias runs strong in this one.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #249 on: February 24, 2021, 02:09:01 am »

Do not want to exile: gkrieg, faust, dylan
I feel odd for not being in a fight with ash yet. There is a distinct chance that he might be scum.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #250 on: February 24, 2021, 02:11:54 am »

The TLDR version:

I think mathdude slipped that they are either mafia or a PR.  My bet is most likely mafia, possibly role cop given the "gather information" focus.

(An aside: If I am right about role cop, mafia selected as least one power, and if they took role cop, I'd say they took at least two more.  That's all conjecture though, with no evidence.)

If they're town, they have a PR that gets a result, like Goon Cop or maybe Tracker.
Wait, wasn't the argument before that mathdude assumed he would live to play D2? And now it's that he supposedly slipped non-VT? Did you just swap out a decent argument for a worse one?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #251 on: February 24, 2021, 02:16:58 am »

It's been a while since we had a vote count, let's see where things stand (there seems to have been some confusing about the size of the EFHW wagon).

Quote from: updated vote count
mathdude (4): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, jotheonah
EFHW (2): WestCoastDidds, MiX
MCMC (1): SpaceAnenome
Joth (2): MCMC, EFHW
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
Not Voting (2): [/color] Robz888, mathdude

The main thing is that Robz and mathdude have switched from voting Space to not voting, which is distinctly unhelpful.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #252 on: February 24, 2021, 02:17:52 am »

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.
I mean... you jumping off the mathdude wagon for this is just exquisitely ironic.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #253 on: February 24, 2021, 02:23:35 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0
« Reply #254 on: February 24, 2021, 06:22:48 am »

The town has two roles to start, resulting in a maximum of five town roles randomly selected from the following

Just in case anyone else's reasoning is predicated on town not getting any PRs unless scum takes some, here's the bit in the rules post where it says we get two random roles as a freebie.

Actually, re-reading Ash, he isn't actually saying that he thinks Mafia must have picked powers because of what mathdude is saying, I just mis-parsed Ash's argument on my first read through. Still, I think it's worth realising that we definitely have at least two from the list of Goon Cop, RB, Tracker, Bodyguard and Vig. (Since we must have 2-5 from the original list of 6, and clearly we have no IC this time round).

I do agree that without specific incriminating evidence, the time to start talking about PRs is usually around D3 or D4 of a game. The desire to do stats-based analysis of what game config we're in before that typically gets scumread, as I've learned from long, bitter experience :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #255 on: February 24, 2021, 06:24:54 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #256 on: February 24, 2021, 06:29:04 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?
I don't want to dismantle the mathdude wagon.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #257 on: February 24, 2021, 06:37:13 am »

These facts that Space worked out are constantly being considered in my head (hence "mathdude"), though I didn't have the time or desire to go back through 7+ pages of posts to figure it out on my phone in bed last night.  I really appreciate the numbers though, Space!  It pretty much lines up with what I was noticing.  And not knowing your whole group or individual metas, these numbers are about all I have to work with at the moment.

Oh, also, obviously (now that you are contributing meaningful posts)...
unvote

Hehe.. Posting stats is something I'll do as scum too, so I deserve exceedingly little town-cred for sharing them overall. I'll take some towncred for putting effort into the game around it, though, assuming that's what you're offering!

What I have for the stats is a couple of scripts that parse the game html, produce a datastructure, and then spit out a pretty standard set of queries on it, plus an html page where I see every single wagon state in the game in sequence, which I find useful in the later game for "wagon-gazing". Assuming you're similarly statsy to me, then you'll probably agree that that's super-useful, but honestly, it's only about half useful as you'd expect, because other people are still weird and illogical a lot of the time...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #258 on: February 24, 2021, 06:44:40 am »

Lots of generic defending here. Let's go through the alignment indicative ones.

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

I think I've addressed most of this in response to Dylan's posts above.  But this is definitely very opportunistic.  I mean, it is vote 4 of 7 required.  But it's also the highest vote count we've gotten yet.  I post honestly.  I post my thoughts.  I'm not worried, in general, about whether a post of mine "would out scum!him" (scum!me).  My thoughts are real, regardless of whether town or mafia.  I am town here, but I don't think my post would be much different even if I was mafia - again, as I've said, I've played this before.

Is it just me or is math parroting my defense of him?

If you think your posts can be done by town and mafia, maybe you should try to make posts only town makes? This probably sounds presumptuous, but still.

This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."

Thanks.  These are some things I'm trying to say in all these replies above (but you use much fewer words to say them!)

What things is Robz saying that you were trying to say?

Yeah, a whole lot of people have jumped in to defend mathdude before we even got a chance to see him respond to the wagon himself. I mean, I get that the one post isn't a sure thing like a true scumslip or anything and he could still be town, but it was a scummier post than a lot of other things that have garnered votes to this point, so I feel like town should have been a little slower to defend it this early in the wagon. It's middle of D1 and this was only the 2nd wagon to even hit 3 people (using the official VCs as reference; Joth's hit 3, MiX moved, then Ash joined to put it back on 3 before moving to mathdude).

I actually agree with you here.  I'm at least as leery of those strongly defending me as I am of those attacking me.  (Now, remember how I post here guys... this is not "I think you all are scum", as before.  This is just saying I'm not so sure about any of this... again/still).  And yes, here I am now, responding to the wagon myself finally.

Why "actually"? Is there anyone that is attacking or defending you that is pinging scummier than average?

Back to Space's post now...

---(MiX snip, post ranking)---

I like these ranked lists.  Total posts is one thing, but is mostly indicative of the person's play/post style in the game... sort of meta info, not necessarily useful for this game (unless someone usually posts a lot and are mostly lurking now).  Total word count is a combination of personal play/post style and engagement in this game.  But I'm actually looking more at the mean (average) words/post.  This helps me get to know you guys, in a nice, summarized way, rather than going back through 9+ pages of replies multiple times.

From one extreme to another, there is gkrieg at 12 words/post to Space over 100.   I knew before Space started the recent posts, both Space and gkrieg were low (on both posts and mean words/post, which also meant total words), but I didn't realize how low gkrieg was.  I could have poked either, really.  I poked Space.  It generated discussion.  I'm glad.  But what's up with gkrieg - is this typical?  Is it even remotely helpful?  Should I have poked gkrieg?  Should I now?

I like this question a lot, questioning gkrieg's existence seems to come from a town mindset, other than a scum one that can ignore him.

So how's that now?  Have I addressed the concerns some of you have?  Now let's drop the silly votes against me and move onto something actually helpful for day-1.  The things I posted last night I did intentionally.  I wrote what I did, and I wouldn't take them back.  Maybe I should have been a little more diplomatic in how I said them, and may have if I was not half asleep.  But I still stand by what I said, and hopefully now with this long post, some of it makes a little more sense.

Wait, weren't the votes helpful? This seems to contradict pretty much everything you've been saying.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #259 on: February 24, 2021, 06:49:16 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?
I don't want to dismantle the mathdude wagon.

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?

PPE: MiX posted another quote wall.. haven't read it yet, but already wondering whether it will change my query about Robz being a better competing wagon target :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #260 on: February 24, 2021, 06:59:53 am »

Do not want to exile: gkrieg, faust, dylan

Why do you not want to exile gkrieg?  Haven't posted anything scummy?  That's because has hardly posted anything at all.

Ash's talked about his read on gkrieg.

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.

mathdude's defense makes sense if you read the offending post as written by someone who is super tired. I'm going to suspend judgement on him for now.

I'm confused about how I am the largest wagon.

I like the argument, I don't like the wagon hopping, but I prefer this vote over one on math. If it weren't for confirmation bias, I'd say this is a townie EFHW thing.

Also, if that moves my mathdude vote, it throws off MiX's wagon placement arguments.

Haha. It also makes it anti-town! Not that I particularly care.

The TLDR version:

I think mathdude slipped that they are either mafia or a PR.  My bet is most likely mafia, possibly role cop given the "gather information" focus.

(An aside: If I am right about role cop, mafia selected as least one power, and if they took role cop, I'd say they took at least two more.  That's all conjecture though, with no evidence.)

If they're town, they have a PR that gets a result, like Goon Cop or maybe Tracker.

(Imagine that I'm quoting the post above that one) This is the kind of logic that I cannot follow through, but is a sign of town!ash.

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.
Joke's  on you; we know you're scum now!

Are you scumreading joth for this? It's not clear.

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

You think my scum partner's protecting me, that this reaction is unlike what town!MiX makes people say, or that you have the same first impression about me as everyone else and you find that irritating?

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?

Do you scumread me? Why would you run a wagon at me in particular?

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?
I don't want to dismantle the mathdude wagon.

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?

PPE: MiX posted another quote wall.. haven't read it yet, but already wondering whether it will change my query about Robz being a better competing wagon target :-P

Why did you mention Robz all of a sudden?


Hey, it's not my fault I'm playing catchup all day, I've been kinda busy lately.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #261 on: February 24, 2021, 07:58:30 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?
I don't want to dismantle the mathdude wagon.

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?
I think so, yes.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #262 on: February 24, 2021, 08:03:07 am »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.
Joke's  on you; we know you're scum now!

Are you scumreading joth for this? It's not clear.
It was a joke.

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

You think my scum partner's protecting me, that this reaction is unlike what town!MiX makes people say, or that you have the same first impression about me as everyone else and you find that irritating?
I just want to force people who avoid giving a read on you to pick a side.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #263 on: February 24, 2021, 08:23:19 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

You think my scum partner's protecting me, that this reaction is unlike what town!MiX makes people say, or that you have the same first impression about me as everyone else and you find that irritating?
I just want to force people who avoid giving a read on you to pick a side.

Such as yourself?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #264 on: February 24, 2021, 08:34:31 am »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

You think my scum partner's protecting me, that this reaction is unlike what town!MiX makes people say, or that you have the same first impression about me as everyone else and you find that irritating?
I just want to force people who avoid giving a read on you to pick a side.

Such as yourself?
Indeed!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #265 on: February 24, 2021, 08:54:20 am »

By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.

So EFHW is E-1?

vote: EFHW

vote: mathdude

"biggest wagon is EFHW's" I think was referring to EFHW creating the most concerning part of the wagon... not that there was a large wagon on them.

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

That's a good question.  2 others have already responded, but I will too (respond to quoting one of their responses below).  But I am trying to figure out why you think that I think I will definitely not die at night.  The best guess I have is this:

However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.

Was that it?  This is a statement to all town in general.  Even if I'm not here, it still bodes well for us, especially now with how much people have jumped into these discussions.

It was partly that, if you want to choose specific words and combinations of words that convey why I had the impression that you thought you would not die at night.

It was more my impression from reading the post in its entirety, that you expected to be playing on Day 2 and available to do the things you said we'd be able to do (like get info from PRs).

When I've played in the past, even if "not much" happens or is revealed, there is still useful info that comes out for day-2.  Reading some more posts since this, it appears the "blind" nature here is saying that we will be probably getting less info than I'm used to... so now that makes some of my posts no longer helpful, so I'm sorry I started down that trail.

At least you have a reason for jumping on the train.  Now, just as I don't know all of you, you don't know me.  Keeping an option open to exile anyone day-1 just makes sense to me at this point in a game.   And being aware of PRs is also me.  Probably as I get to know you guys, I'll do a little more thinking in my head about PRs on day-1, and save the actual discussion for day 2 or 3, when we can actually gather information from them.  I just wanted to (as you point out) "subtly" let you guys know I was thinking about them.  I will have questions about them - possibly towards the end of day-1, or definitely on day-2 as info is revealed.  I know about power roles, but I want to make sure I understand how exactly they work and are treated here (as it may be slightly different than what I'm used to).

Also, I'm definitely a fan of kicking intentional lurkers.  If we see people lurking but not contributing, that's one thing.  If people are just busy IRL, that's another.  And I don't know which is which at this point, but the "Space Count" and Space's analysis definitely helped me a bit there.

Snipping what I read as the most useful part of your very long defense.

As a general rule, I would warn that there is no reason for you to assume that there will be any information to be had on subsequent days from power roles in any game.  People don't share, people miss, people die, etc.

In this game, I really feel like you are hurting yourself here.  This focus on PRs (which I didn't read as much of in the original post that got all this started but do see here a lot) and their possible information and role to be played in future days has basically put you in the mafia OR town PR category at this point.  That's bad for a multitude of reasons.  I'll try to lay it out as best I can:

--your previous post and this post both share a lot of assumptions regarding PR play, usage, and -- most importantly here -- existence.  As a semi-closed setup, part of a PR's protection is the hidden nature of that role.  The players here who are more likely to think PRs exist and will be contributing something are, you guessed it, the PRs themselves and the mafia who know how many PRs exist.
--while you can (and probably will) argue that your posts are about mafia games in general, it is difficult to believe that what you write in this game thread is not about this game.
--so, your confidence in the way we will "gather information" from the PRs will take part in this game in Day 2 and beyond makes me think you have more information that a VT would -- so either mafia or a PR.
--your mention of sharing information leans more toward specific roles: in this setup, the Role Cop, Goon Cop, and Tracker.  A no kill means the Roleblocker might have something to say, as well.  The Bodyguard, for example, would have no information to share.
--can you say that you just meant "gather information" from whatever we see (i.e., bodyguard death, no kill, two kills, etc.)?  Sure.  But that's not a surefire defense, nor will I be inclined to believe it.

So, I see two distinct possibilities:

#1: You are mafia, expect to live through the night because what are the chances a vig exists AND shoots the "newbie" and therefore slipped.
#2: You are a PR, probably one that gets results (Goon Cop or Tracker) and PR slipped (or breadcrumbed badly), which means you, or the possible bodyguard who protects you, dies.

Is #2 the worst?  Maybe not.  You get a result of some sort and survive IF there is a bodyguard.  Chances aren't my forte, so someone who does math can figure that out.  But #2 is still very bad.

There is a #3, which is an f.ds staple, where you are a VT purposefully angling for the NK to protect others.  In that case, you still end up getting the Bodyguard killed, if they exist.

So anyway, that's a deeper look into why I think exiling you makes sense, as I see #1 to be more likely than #2.  (I think PRs are more careful about not slipping information that would give themselves away on D1.)

And these are things that would have been helpful for me to learn, if I had the time to read through past games (to read the group meta, and to learn about this setup).  It seems obvious that I would claim either #2 or #3.  But as I think it's been clear that I've been saying... this is just me learning how things work here.

The TLDR version:

I think mathdude slipped that they are either mafia or a PR.  My bet is most likely mafia, possibly role cop given the "gather information" focus.

(An aside: If I am right about role cop, mafia selected as least one power, and if they took role cop, I'd say they took at least two more.  That's all conjecture though, with no evidence.)

If they're town, they have a PR that gets a result, like Goon Cop or maybe Tracker.
Wait, wasn't the argument before that mathdude assumed he would live to play D2? And now it's that he supposedly slipped non-VT? Did you just swap out a decent argument for a worse one?

The argument against me definitely did change.  I was trying to generate discussion, and now I'm being picked apart.

The town has two roles to start, resulting in a maximum of five town roles randomly selected from the following

Just in case anyone else's reasoning is predicated on town not getting any PRs unless scum takes some, here's the bit in the rules post where it says we get two random roles as a freebie.

Actually, re-reading Ash, he isn't actually saying that he thinks Mafia must have picked powers because of what mathdude is saying, I just mis-parsed Ash's argument on my first read through. Still, I think it's worth realising that we definitely have at least two from the list of Goon Cop, RB, Tracker, Bodyguard and Vig. (Since we must have 2-5 from the original list of 6, and clearly we have no IC this time round).

I do agree that without specific incriminating evidence, the time to start talking about PRs is usually around D3 or D4 of a game. The desire to do stats-based analysis of what game config we're in before that typically gets scumread, as I've learned from long, bitter experience :-P

So this is sort of what I was saying.  The setup to me seems like we have power roles.  So let's use them.  I guess I'm not used to them being hidden until D3 or D4.  Obviously not full claims, but at least start discussing them D1 or D2 is what I'm used to.

What things is Robz saying that you were trying to say?

This right here...
This post just strikes me as newbie trying to contribute meaningfully. I don't think it's a townie post particularly, and yes it's hedgy, but haven't we actually decided that hedginess is not actually a scum characteristic? Isn't it something I falsely claimed was hedgy 130 games ago?

Besides "should we just exile lurkers" is a point we end up debating every other game, and it turns out the pro-town answer is "basically, yes."
I'm trying to be a useful contributor.  That sometimes ends up coming off scummy.  And we should exile lurkers since they don't help town.
Logged
he/him

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #266 on: February 24, 2021, 09:06:44 am »

Vote: MiX
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #267 on: February 24, 2021, 09:08:45 am »

And we should exile lurkers since they don't help town.

For the record, I agree with you, but for whatever reason that's just emphatically not the meta around here. It's darn-near impossible to actually push through a day 1 lurker exile.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #268 on: February 24, 2021, 09:33:02 am »

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.
I mean... you jumping off the mathdude wagon for this is just exquisitely ironic.
Only if I jumped on the mathdude wagon as opportunistic scum. Since I actually jumped on as using-my-vote town, there is no particular irony here.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #269 on: February 24, 2021, 09:37:16 am »

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.
I mean... you jumping off the mathdude wagon for this is just exquisitely ironic.
Only if I jumped on the mathdude wagon as opportunistic scum. Since I actually jumped on as using-my-vote town, there is no particular irony here.

Okay, then it's ironic if joth's also town.
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #270 on: February 24, 2021, 09:44:59 am »

Well you have certainly been busy! I'll try to give some comments as I catch up.

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.
Is fishing for wagons a bad thing?
I think so because it safely allows scum to find wagons town is willing to be a part of. I get that people like fishy for wagons so they can "catch" scum jumping on in a scummy way but I think it is more likely townies join stupid wagons then scum since they are less worried about the opticits so yea I'm not a fan of wagon fishing for "interactions" sake
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #271 on: February 24, 2021, 09:48:04 am »

The TLDR version:

I think mathdude slipped that they are either mafia or a PR.  My bet is most likely mafia, possibly role cop given the "gather information" focus.

(An aside: If I am right about role cop, mafia selected as least one power, and if they took role cop, I'd say they took at least two more.  That's all conjecture though, with no evidence.)

If they're town, they have a PR that gets a result, like Goon Cop or maybe Tracker.
Wait, wasn't the argument before that mathdude assumed he would live to play D2? And now it's that he supposedly slipped non-VT? Did you just swap out a decent argument for a worse one?
Those are one in the same, the assumption of being alive Day 2 is the mafia slip, and having some kind of result to work with, is the non-vt slip.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #272 on: February 24, 2021, 10:02:39 am »

Scumslips generally aren't real either, right?
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #273 on: February 24, 2021, 10:08:03 am »

Scumslips generally aren't real either, right?

I am guessing by this you mean to indicate that you don't think scumslips are generally a thing and that historically we as a forum have misexhiled more than caught scum off slips and in fact scum frequently uses it to exhile townies who make mistakes. I think while that is historically true its because we play with a similar small group over a long enough time that we learn what things not to do a scum and then in turn use that against townies who don't self edit carefully enough. This is different as it's not someone who would know that mentioning pr's is a big nono for scum and should actually be concerned about mentioning pr's if they are a town one.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #274 on: February 24, 2021, 11:15:48 am »

By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.

So EFHW is E-1?

vote: EFHW

vote: mathdude

"biggest wagon is EFHW's" I think was referring to EFHW creating the most concerning part of the wagon... not that there was a large wagon on them.
No, MiX puts a lot of pressure on me Day 1 because he thinks that's the easiest day to get me exiled. One way he does it is to make comments like this, planting the seed that I am scummy and everyone thinks so. He would do this as town or scum, unfortunately, so it's pretty NAI.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #275 on: February 24, 2021, 11:17:29 am »

By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.

So EFHW is E-1?

vote: EFHW

vote: mathdude

"biggest wagon is EFHW's" I think was referring to EFHW creating the most concerning part of the wagon... not that there was a large wagon on them.
No, MiX puts a lot of pressure on me Day 1 because he thinks that's the easiest day to get me exiled. One way he does it is to make comments like this, planting the seed that I am scummy and everyone thinks so. He would do this as town or scum, unfortunately, so it's pretty NAI.

I don't think I'd do this as scum. At least empirically.

Also, what I meant by that post is "math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon besides math's is EFHW's. Because EFHW was the only wagon with 2+ votes that wasn't math's at the time.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #276 on: February 24, 2021, 12:02:55 pm »

Yeah, it started after we were scum together. So you haven't been scum since, unless you are now.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #277 on: February 24, 2021, 01:13:31 pm »

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?
I think so, yes.

Did you notice that Robz went from saying that he definitely wasn't townreading mcmc, to voting me for "being wrong", and then to unvoting entirely, with no more mention of mcmc at all? I thought that was a bit interesting, especially because the three game posts mcmc made in the intervening time were three of the ones I think I struggle most with seeing a sensible townie narrative for.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #278 on: February 24, 2021, 01:16:56 pm »

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?
I think so, yes.

Did you notice that Robz went from saying that he definitely wasn't townreading mcmc, to voting me for "being wrong", and then to unvoting entirely, with no more mention of mcmc at all? I thought that was a bit interesting, especially because the three game posts mcmc made in the intervening time were three of the ones I think I struggle most with seeing a sensible townie narrative for.

Now that's a very good case.

Vote: Robz, I'm not feeling like this is the game where I want to park my vote on EFHW all day anymore.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #279 on: February 24, 2021, 01:27:20 pm »

Could I entice someone to start a wagon on MiX? Every other post I read about him is like "it's just MiX doing MiX things" and I find that very irritating.

But people feeling frustrated at MiX's behaviour is such a "just people doing people things" thing...

TBH, I don't hate the idea of running up a few votes on MiX and seeing who jumps. Why do you want to entice someone else to do the dirty work of starting the wagon, though, rather than just dropping your own vote there and then observing who follows?
I don't want to dismantle the mathdude wagon.

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?

PPE: MiX posted another quote wall.. haven't read it yet, but already wondering whether it will change my query about Robz being a better competing wagon target :-P

Why did you mention Robz all of a sudden?

Again, I fail to see why that's the question you most feel the need to ask at this juncture, especially when I mentioned Robz in the context of a question asked to a specific non-MiX person.

Specifically, you're coming across to me as someone who's trying too hard to appear engaged, and are asking a bunch of questions of dubious utility when taking a breath and observing other people's reactions might actually be the more valuable path to take. So either you're genuinely flustered town, which is possible (though you're neither new nor particularly gathering votes just now), or you're scum having a hard time getting a purchase on the game, and are just making a lot of noise.

Have we correctly exiled MiX at some point in recent history (last 12-ish months?) for much the sort of behaviour we all tend to low-key scumread him for anyway? I feel like maybe we have, but also my memory is terrible...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #280 on: February 24, 2021, 01:33:36 pm »

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?
I think so, yes.

Did you notice that Robz went from saying that he definitely wasn't townreading mcmc, to voting me for "being wrong", and then to unvoting entirely, with no more mention of mcmc at all? I thought that was a bit interesting, especially because the three game posts mcmc made in the intervening time were three of the ones I think I struggle most with seeing a sensible townie narrative for.

Now that's a very good case.

Vote: Robz, I'm not feeling like this is the game where I want to park my vote on EFHW all day anymore.

Um.. MiX, did you spot that the three mcmc posts in question are the ones you argued to me were townie? :-P

You're one of the players I'd expect not to agree with me so much on that basis, at least if you thought through my reasoning. Would you like to at least comment on why you think Robz shouldn't have found them townie?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #281 on: February 24, 2021, 01:40:34 pm »

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?

PPE: MiX posted another quote wall.. haven't read it yet, but already wondering whether it will change my query about Robz being a better competing wagon target :-P

Why did you mention Robz all of a sudden?

Again, I fail to see why that's the question you most feel the need to ask at this juncture, especially when I mentioned Robz in the context of a question asked to a specific non-MiX person.

Specifically, you're coming across to me as someone who's trying too hard to appear engaged, and are asking a bunch of questions of dubious utility when taking a breath and observing other people's reactions might actually be the more valuable path to take. So either you're genuinely flustered town, which is possible (though you're neither new nor particularly gathering votes just now), or you're scum having a hard time getting a purchase on the game, and are just making a lot of noise.

Have we correctly exiled MiX at some point in recent history (last 12-ish months?) for much the sort of behaviour we all tend to low-key scumread him for anyway? I feel like maybe we have, but also my memory is terrible...

You could also answer the question. I presume you were (already?) scumreading them when you said it, but by saying "is MiX a better alternative than Robz" instead of "is Robz a viable alternative to MiX" or something similar, it's almost like faust was already considering Robz, which I believe he was not. That's why I think mentioning Robz was weird.

Or I'm just busy and I don't have time to reread this game and think things through. I love being active at the moment, but honestly, at any given point in this week I have been busy with something, or trying to rest between doing one thing and another. So I find it much easier to post live than reread. That's why I'm going a lot from posts I saw recently and why I'm trying to make sure I comment on all the important ones, so at least I'm caught up.

Correctly? No. But you have cornered me D1 and then exiled my partners.

Did you notice that Robz went from saying that he definitely wasn't townreading mcmc, to voting me for "being wrong", and then to unvoting entirely, with no more mention of mcmc at all? I thought that was a bit interesting, especially because the three game posts mcmc made in the intervening time were three of the ones I think I struggle most with seeing a sensible townie narrative for.

Now that's a very good case.

Vote: Robz, I'm not feeling like this is the game where I want to park my vote on EFHW all day anymore.

Um.. MiX, did you spot that the three mcmc posts in question are the ones you argued to me were townie? :-P

You're one of the players I'd expect not to agree with me so much on that basis, at least if you thought through my reasoning. Would you like to at least comment on why you think Robz shouldn't have found them townie?

I didn't look at the posts yet. Do they matter for your case against Robz?
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #282 on: February 24, 2021, 01:42:38 pm »

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?
I think so, yes.

Did you notice that Robz went from saying that he definitely wasn't townreading mcmc, to voting me for "being wrong", and then to unvoting entirely, with no more mention of mcmc at all? I thought that was a bit interesting, especially because the three game posts mcmc made in the intervening time were three of the ones I think I struggle most with seeing a sensible townie narrative for.

Now that's a very good case.

Vote: Robz, I'm not feeling like this is the game where I want to park my vote on EFHW all day anymore.

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #283 on: February 24, 2021, 01:43:43 pm »

Word-sparse players are gkrieg, faust and EFHW, which is not too unsurprising.
"not too unsurprising" is hard for me to parse... though I feel like you mean "not too surprising"?

Yeah, in retrospect, I can't even parse me well there! The number of times I know exactly what I'm talking about is evidently a bit lower than I think it is.

Anyway, I would expect low-wordcount play from you especially, though usually I can get suspicious of you when you're not making sufficient logical sense, so you're fine so far this game. I'm not even sure what I'd usually scumread EFHW for, so she's definitely a harder one for me to read. Gkrieg always scumreads me first, so that saves me a bit of brainpower never having to be the instigator of suspicion at least.

On the gkrieg front, is he about to swoop in and solve d1 for us now?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #284 on: February 24, 2021, 01:54:10 pm »

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote

I was wondering what was going to happen after I voted you, since you had voted me. It was a bit of a coincidence though.

I wouldn't change my playstyle because of my buddy though.

Bolded: Townslip from Robz? I doubt it.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #285 on: February 24, 2021, 02:03:06 pm »

Vote Count 1.5:
mathdude (4): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth
Joth (2): MCMC, EFHW
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
MCMC (1): SpaceAnenome
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
Robz888 (1): MiX
Not Voting (2): Robz888, mathdude


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time. That is in 2 days time!!!
« Last Edit: February 24, 2021, 09:18:18 pm by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #286 on: February 24, 2021, 02:35:11 pm »

I'll vote gkrieg for inactivity.

Vote: gkrieg
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #287 on: February 24, 2021, 03:01:32 pm »

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote

I was wondering what was going to happen after I voted you, since you had voted me. It was a bit of a coincidence though.

I wouldn't change my playstyle because of my buddy though.

Bolded: Townslip from Robz? I doubt it.

Possibly town slip IFF we didn't already know that Robz had read the setup in order to have his opinion that daychat would be the only power taken... However, we know he did read it, which makes that assumption look really bad to me.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #288 on: February 24, 2021, 03:37:42 pm »

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote

I was wondering what was going to happen after I voted you, since you had voted me. It was a bit of a coincidence though.

I wouldn't change my playstyle because of my buddy though.

Bolded: Townslip from Robz? I doubt it.

Possibly town slip IFF we didn't already know that Robz had read the setup in order to have his opinion that daychat would be the only power taken... However, we know he did read it, which makes that assumption look really bad to me.

If scum did pick the option to convert traitor to goon, this could actually be a scumslip, with Robz knowing that scum has multiple buddies but forgetting that town doesn't know that. So it's either a townslip or a scumslip, which kind of makes it a nothingslip.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #289 on: February 24, 2021, 03:51:02 pm »

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote

I was wondering what was going to happen after I voted you, since you had voted me. It was a bit of a coincidence though.

I wouldn't change my playstyle because of my buddy though.

Bolded: Townslip from Robz? I doubt it.

Possibly town slip IFF we didn't already know that Robz had read the setup in order to have his opinion that daychat would be the only power taken... However, we know he did read it, which makes that assumption look really bad to me.

If scum did pick the option to convert traitor to goon, this could actually be a scumslip, with Robz knowing that scum has multiple buddies but forgetting that town doesn't know that. So it's either a townslip or a scumslip, which kind of makes it a nothingslip.

I mean, if we didn't already have evidence that Robz had actually paid attention to the setup and that he was publicly of the opinion that scum wouldn't recruit the traitor, I would agree with you. But, from a truthful town!Robz perspective, he read it and was of the opinion scum most likely didn't recruit the traitor, and so he just momentarily forgot about what he'd read before and just used default language from other setups.

The scum!Robz narrative is that he publicly suggested that scum took different power(s) than what they really took since he knows they took the recruit option, and then just slipped with the plural "buddies."

If he hadn't read the setup at all, townslip all the way, but we know he did. There's still a possibility he just made a town!mistake based on the fact probably most games here have 3 man teams, but I don't know. This is an ironic conversation after the earlier convo about scumslips not being a real thing... I lean like 70% to it being scummy, but last time I latched onto something like this D1, I was wrong, so idk...
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #290 on: February 24, 2021, 03:55:25 pm »

Ok, I guess for the sake of precision, he was of the public opinion scum would only take daychat, which is logically equivalent to they wouldn't recruit the traitor, but that does not mean he specifically thought about the traitor when he read the setup initially.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #291 on: February 24, 2021, 03:55:58 pm »

I think it was a town slip.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #292 on: February 24, 2021, 04:24:09 pm »

I think it was a town slip.

Oh do you?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #293 on: February 24, 2021, 05:52:04 pm »

Now I know what everyone will say here; but I think I townslipped when I said that. I forgot traitor can be recruited.

Anyway, that was a fun little topic of debate and I'm proud I started it!

I think it was a town slip.

Can you explain what you mean by this?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #294 on: February 24, 2021, 06:20:09 pm »

Ok reading this now.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #295 on: February 24, 2021, 06:21:25 pm »

Woah, that's crazy.

Vote: joth

Why the Joth vote?

True, but given he FoS’d you your vote has an implied OMGUS.

Vote: Dylan32

Joth started this, and I think he's a better vote than mathdude.

Does MiX usually start trying to scum hunt very early in the game?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #296 on: February 24, 2021, 06:21:52 pm »

Also, hi everyone! Feels like it's been a while!!

Hi Space!
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #297 on: February 24, 2021, 06:25:29 pm »

Vote: mathdude

Another interesting vote from MiX. Getting scum vibes from them.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #298 on: February 24, 2021, 06:28:54 pm »

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?

Goading mathdude for something that has already been pointed out about mathdude seems scummy to me. Maybe I'm just tunneling MiX.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #299 on: February 24, 2021, 06:29:38 pm »

Mathdude, MiX is pretty much the most suspicion-inducing person there is. He does all kinds of things that seem not very town, even when he’s town. I haven’t made up my mind about him this game, but I’d advise taking any suspicion of him with a big grain of salt. He’s his own breed of cat.

I really like the alliteration of Anenome Artiface, but Space Gambit seems more fitting.

You know who the most laid-back assassin is though? EFHW. Stone cold killa. She never seems scummy when she is...

Vote: EFHW

This is very true about EFHW, although I haven't gotten the scum vibes from her this game yet.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #300 on: February 24, 2021, 06:31:23 pm »

Mathdude, MiX is pretty much the most suspicion-inducing person there is. He does all kinds of things that seem not very town, even when he’s town. I haven’t made up my mind about him this game, but I’d advise taking any suspicion of him with a big grain of salt. He’s his own breed of cat.

Dangit Didds, now mathdude won't get a genuine read on me which means I can't just call him town for him scumreading me. How am I supposed to read him now?

Well, no more bites on leaving my vote on ash. Then I guess I will...
vote: Dylan

But MiX, I've got my eye on you.

Who do you think is scummy? Did you think ash was scummy? Do you think Dylan's scummy? Do you think I'm scum? I see a lot of votes, but they're all distractions, what are you really thinking right now?

Not knowing how any of you play, how good of a scum read do you think I can get on anyone? It's day 1 and maybe some of you can read each other, but I'm just guessing.

Dylan was a shot in the dark (I started with him because he's no longer IC). But his reaction and others' responses seem to tell me it's a good spot to leave my vote for now.
I had no read on ash, so that was purely to look for reactions and responses. It worked. I never intended to leave my vote there, and I think that was obvious.
MiX, something about your defense of ash gives me a slight scum-read. I'll let that sit for now, but I will be watching what you say.

You call these deflections. I call them promoting discussion. Maybe I'm doing this "wrong", but this is how I do day 1.

PPE based on what Didds said - thanks for the heads-up. I won't push too hard on MiX yet if they always read scummy.

I called them distractions, not deflections. Slightly different. And I don't think you're playing incorrectly, I just want to know what's going on inside your head. That's kinda what the game's about.

I would also highly recommend reading past games, getting a feel of someone's meta helps a lot on the first game. I know I did that before I played my first game here and I had the worst reads possible, but hey, it's better than no reads at all.


Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.

I also don't like this vote, which is once again getting on a wagon for not too great a reason.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #301 on: February 24, 2021, 06:41:19 pm »

I am in a day of non-stop meetings. So, this is some high overview stuff instead of post-specific replies.

I am giving some squinty side-eye to MiX and Dylan talking about responses that have emotional components in them as a bad thing. The wordsy people use emotion not as a crutch, but as a part of the way we think. Joth's frustration at having his case scrutinized feels way more authentic and compelling to me than if he hadn't frustration, and I don't think that it has an emaotional component is a reason to discount it.

I freaking love Ashersky's description of putting in the work as oversalting. And Joth is right, Ash's reads of individuals and their typical playstyle is enviable.

When I initially voted for EFHW, it was RVS-lite because she was laying low, but in the time since then (page 5 for me) she has leaned into the scumminess, largely in response to MiX.

I am also seeing way less of faust than I'd have expected at this point in the game.

This seems like a townie WCD post. She is definitely scum hunting in this post.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #302 on: February 24, 2021, 06:43:04 pm »

For the record, posting too much and thereby heaping suspicion on myself and skating way too close to being the day 1 exile is pretty standard meta for me regardless of my role and alignment. I would argue that if anything scum!joth is a more careful poster. He would never have posted

Why is it that about 20 people in this game have made totally unexplained votes and been completely ignored but I'm getting the third degree for voting for someone who made a really bad case and explaining that I'm voting for him because he made a really bad case?

because, as Dylan said, it reads as a scummy overreaction to a small amount of scrutiny. But town!Joth just sort of clicked post because he was feeling ticked off because he hadn't had his coffee yet and didn't even consider how it might come across.

Nah I think that's simply a joth!joth post, you'd think of that at least 5 times before posting it as either alignment. This, however, is a town!joth post.

May I interest you in an EFHW wagon? She tried to deflect my vote very aggressively, this might be (yet another) scum!EFHW game!

I feel like you're interpreting their post way more aggressively than it sounds to me. I mean, I'm not opposed to building an EFHW wagon, but you haven't given me enough reason to start one yet.

Re: Didds - I didn't say using emotion in this game is a problem. I've had my share of emotional moments and frustration that has bled into my posts before, so I wasn't saying emotion=scummy. The degree of emotion after literally two posts that read to me more like asking questions rather than strong pushback struck me as possibly insincere emotion. His most recent posts have sounded a bit more towny to me though, so I'm willing to accept it was probably genuine.

I also like this explanation from Dylan. Does not seem like the kind of post scum makes when they are trying to look at the game from a town perspective. Shows an evolving read on joth, which looks like scum hunting to me.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #303 on: February 24, 2021, 06:44:10 pm »

Wow. I am incapable of being that crafty.

The nothing case was my vote on ash.

I disagree that you are incapable of being that crafty.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #304 on: February 24, 2021, 06:49:36 pm »

I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

What's the scummiest place in the wagon if math's town? I'm thinking this one.

I think you are all assuming math is an expert, because he's tried very hard to appear as one. But the truth is he's a new player in terms of knowing the meta here, and you should think of him as such. The super scummy post is incredibly towny because no scum would ever risk posting it. It's probably the most honest post yet, by anyone.

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Who has complained about that, other than yourself?

For complaints that I'm just townreading everyone... Well, I'm NOT townreading mcmc, that's for sure.

Ooohhh...... what is off about him, besides the aforementioned man-bun?

Can't quite put it into words yet.

Who are you voting for, and why?

Of all the reactions to mathdude's post, this is my least favorite.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #305 on: February 24, 2021, 06:53:57 pm »

Vote: Space for being wrong

Hehe, the first thought that pops into my head here is that this is exactly the sort of disagreement we've actively talked about wanting to fabricate when we're both on the scumteam, isn't it? Sadly, I can guarantee we're not both scum here because I'm town!

Anyway, I don't think a claim of "we actually decided" anything in a group like this can reasonably be backed up as an open-and-shut case, therefore I'm not really wrong. I'm also not even sure I support the "hedginess isn't scummy" argument, because I think as scum you do have to put in some effort to keep your options open and be able to pivot onto an interesting wagon. At best I'd grant that hedginess in D1 is not usually necessary for scum, since nobody knows what's going on and there are probably plenty of open wagons to jump on.

The other option (which would allow you to claim I'm actually wrong!) is that I'm just not part of the "we" with whom you're agreeing on the thing. It's possible, in that I've only been playing on this site for ~4.5 years, so I'm a relative newbie to the likes of some of you :-P

This post is full of just the right amount of sarcasm (sass? not sure this is quite the right word) that is more likely to come from town!Space.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #306 on: February 24, 2021, 07:03:00 pm »

Reading Robz as town. It feels like he is scum hunting in his own way.

Jury is still out on Ash. He likes to buddy me when he is scum, which it feels like he is doing here, but obviously he is also genuine here I think, so I'm not sure yet. But i also like his posts 140-142 so I'm leaning slightly town on him.

mathdude seems townie so far.

Obviously reading MiX as scum. I don't like where they have voted and how they have popped around their vote at the beginning of so many wagons and then jumped off when they didn't pick up immediate steam.

Reading faust as townie. His posts seem to be the matter-of-fact posts I expect from him as town while applying pressure with some of his votes D1.

It seems like joth is jumped on a bunch early in the Day. But I like how he is defending himself.

I like Dylan here, seems to also be scum hunting and posting good analysis of people and their posts.

Mathdude had the obvious scummy post, but I would rather exile MiX and then loop back to mathdude if MiX is scum. I think scum!MiX is more likely to defend town!mathdude than town!MiX defending scum!mathdude.

Space reads townie to me. Taking something they can analyze (whether or not it actually indicates scumminess, I'm not sure) and talking about it. Obviously it is something they can do equally well as scum, but they still just read townie to me by their tone.

I don't have any real reads on mcmc yet, although I usually tone-read him poorly. EFHW also doesn't read anything to me yet, but I can usually read her after a Day or two. WCD is leaning town.

vote: MiX

Note to self: stopped reading at mathdude's long post on page 10.


Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #307 on: February 24, 2021, 07:14:48 pm »

Gkrieg!! It’s so good to see you! I appreciate the fresh eyes.

I’m still wary of EFHW, but that is a vote that’s not doing much right now.

Vote: MiX seems more fitting right now
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #308 on: February 24, 2021, 07:46:47 pm »

I was going to defend myself against gkrieg's case, but there's really nothing. I stand by every vote I made this game, I don't think any of them are superfluous, anti-town, scummy or jumping wagons: just following my current reads and trying to make competing or leading wagons that are relevant in the present and future. Why is that scummy?
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #309 on: February 24, 2021, 08:24:41 pm »

Is MiX a better alterative than Robz, if you're looking to grow a second wagon to compete?
I think so, yes.

Did you notice that Robz went from saying that he definitely wasn't townreading mcmc, to voting me for "being wrong", and then to unvoting entirely, with no more mention of mcmc at all? I thought that was a bit interesting, especially because the three game posts mcmc made in the intervening time were three of the ones I think I struggle most with seeing a sensible townie narrative for.

These are the three posts you can't see a town narrative for.
I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.

So I'm fishing for wagons, but when the best and most plausible wagon in the game cropped up (mathdude) I decided to ignore it? And I also passed up an opportunity to hop on the EFHW wagon after being explicitly invited to join it?

Are they both my partners? Or am I just really bad at fishing for wagons? :P

Fishing for wagons and joining quickly built wagons are two very different things. I think you are good at fishing for wagons safely and are acutely aware/concerned of the attention joining the math wagon would bring on you.

Why even bother giving out a day pass if it can be revoked at any time? Seems like false advertising.

My thought as well!

Because giving out day passes is a fun laze-fair towny thing to do but he also doesn’t want to count out joining a super quick wagon. Once he can think of a good excuse to that is.
I get disagreeing with my read on joth but you can't find a town narrative? I'm literally explaining my scum read. Also you are mis connecting my post about the day pass to ash I am referring to joth.

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

Wait. Have you even played with Robz before? Since when does he do things D1?

What do you think of mathdude?

The post raised eyebrows but I would not have expected it to garner three votes in rapid succession. The suggestion of directing town PRs pings us as scummy, but it seems like something a new person might not realize was problematic. And the rest of it just seems like a new person who's frustrated with Day 1 and wants to get things rolling, which is a feeling I can very much relate to.

He's on my radar, but I haven't revoked his day pass.

I wasn't throwing shade at ash, he gave a day pass and then removed it when math did something he found scummy that makes perfect sense. It is joth who I think seconded the "day pass" which is light hearted to appear towny, then didn't want to hard remove it because jumping on the quick math wagon seemed too scummy without a good reason but scum hates to pass up an easy exhile hence him needed to keep his option. Again how you can't see a sensible town narrative from my posting and explaining my scum read is a little over the top.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #310 on: February 24, 2021, 08:34:58 pm »

Now I'm just reading everyone as town, franky.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #311 on: February 24, 2021, 08:35:17 pm »

I guess not EFHW. Vote: EFHW
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #312 on: February 24, 2021, 08:59:33 pm »

Vote Count 1.5:
mathdude (4): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth
Joth (2): MCMC, EFHW
SpaceAnenome (1): mathdude
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
MCMC (1): SpaceAnenome
Ashersky (1): gkrieg
Robz888 (1): MiX
Not Voting (1): Robz888


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time. That is in 2 days time!!!

Looks like this was missed:

Oh, also, obviously (now that you are contributing meaningful posts)...
unvote

Thank you. Fixed.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2021, 09:19:02 pm by Swowl »
Logged
he/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #313 on: February 24, 2021, 09:22:13 pm »

Now I'm just reading everyone as town, franky.
What changed in your read on mcmc?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #314 on: February 24, 2021, 09:23:18 pm »

This feels like town!MiX to me.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #315 on: February 24, 2021, 09:28:38 pm »

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.
I mean... you jumping off the mathdude wagon for this is just exquisitely ironic.
Only if I jumped on the mathdude wagon as opportunistic scum. Since I actually jumped on as using-my-vote town, there is no particular irony here.

Okay, then it's ironic if joth's also town.

And scum!faust would know if we were both town...
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #316 on: February 24, 2021, 09:31:37 pm »

Now I'm just reading everyone as town, franky.
What changed in your read on mcmc?

I was asked to explain it and realized I couldn't!
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #317 on: February 24, 2021, 09:43:17 pm »

I am finding myself disagreeing with Space more than usual. @Space, can you say why you had trouble reading mcmc's posts with a town narrative?

I also have misgivings about mathdude's most recent long post. I'm starting to lean in that direction again. He complains about being "picked apart" and his PR discussion seems strange. It must happen on other sites as well that town decides to keep quiet about PRs early on. Finally, he says he is trying to contribute, but this post and the previous one are his defense, and then he lurked until pointing out the vote count error.

vote: mathdude. E-2.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #318 on: February 24, 2021, 10:44:17 pm »

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote

You mean in their daychat that you somehow know they chose?

vote: Robz
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #319 on: February 24, 2021, 10:48:33 pm »

And having read the rest of the thread, I see it was discussed.

To support the narrative: Robz is actually giving the advice in the daychat that he is putting in thread, maintaining the "lie as little as possible" tactic that serves mafia so well.  He started the wagon, which gives him town!cred if MiX is mafia and lynched, but hopped off early enough and with a good enough reason to not get much partner suspicion.

So both Robz and MiX would be mafia in this scenario.

It doesn't actually affect my mathdude read at all, but it adds a whole new dimension.

I'd vote for any of the three.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #320 on: February 24, 2021, 10:49:36 pm »

vote: mathdude so there's no thinking I'm trying to save him there as he neared E.

But I will switch as needed.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #321 on: February 24, 2021, 10:50:13 pm »

Also, 48 hours to deadline?  Is that right?  I'm way ahead of you all time zone-wise.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #322 on: February 24, 2021, 10:52:51 pm »

I guess not EFHW. Vote: EFHW

This is a nothing vote, considering she's just not under consideration for exile at this point.  So if you want her under consideration, perhaps a case to go along with that vote would help you.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #323 on: February 24, 2021, 10:56:54 pm »

Vote Count 1.6:
mathdude (5): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW
MiX (2): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds
Joth (1): MCMC
EFHW (1): Robz888
MCMC (1): SpaceAnenome
Robz888 (1): MiX
Not Voting (1): mathdude


With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Exile.
Day 1 ends February 26th at 10:40pm Forum Time. That is in 2 days time!!!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #324 on: February 24, 2021, 10:57:27 pm »

I had written up an updated VC and stuff, but then it appeared!
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #325 on: February 24, 2021, 10:58:16 pm »

Another random thing that supports the Robz/MiX team plan -- MiX's vote on Robz is the safest bus ever, as Robz wasn't getting (and probably still isn't getting) exiled on D1.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #326 on: February 24, 2021, 10:58:55 pm »

Also, obligatory reminder than an E-1 vote is the same as a hammer.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #327 on: February 24, 2021, 11:01:48 pm »

Also, 48 hours to deadline?  Is that right?  I'm way ahead of you all time zone-wise.

Yeah, give or take 10 minutes.

I voted MiX purely as an experiment to see if he would vote for me in retaliation, and he didn't disappoint.

But I actually think if he was scum, his buddies might have explained to him that he has to stop doing this pure retribution stay-alive-at-all-costs sort of thing.

Unvote

You mean in their daychat that you somehow know they chose?

vote: Robz

I think he meant in the nightchat, you know, the N0 thing.

I had written up an updated VC and stuff, but then it appeared!

Cool, I also wanted to know the VC!

I kinda really hate how there's barely any alternatives to math...oh and that I'm one of them.

Another random thing that supports the Robz/MiX team plan -- MiX's vote on Robz is the safest bus ever, as Robz wasn't getting (and probably still isn't getting) exiled on D1.

Well he should cause he's scum. Or at least he can be.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #328 on: February 25, 2021, 01:05:13 am »

I think he meant in the nightchat, you know, the N0 thing.

Could you confirm by checking the QT if he told you during N0 or after the day started?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #329 on: February 25, 2021, 01:11:13 am »

I'm not sure how much my opinion matters at this point, as to who we should vote for - it looks (and partly is) going to be self-preservation and defensive, and I'm the new guy who has no idea how to read any of you.  But here's my thoughts anyway - people I think have reasonable suspicion today and should be considered:

MiX - even if this is "normal", it still comes across as scummy (and could be a good wall to hide behind)
gkrieg - for the first 3-4 days, was basically non-existent (though recent posts a few hours ago are starting to contribute)
Dylan - my first impression right near the beginning was a scum-read here, and nothing has changed my mind (in fact, some of the defending of me has given me more of a scum-read)

To put my vote out there, I'll
vote: MiX
for now... but I'd comfortably switch to any of the other two if others feel one of them is a better choice.

It may be just my personal opinion, but I'd feel like mafia have to be super careful with what they type, especially on a very active day-1 like this.  Town on the other hand want to help read as much as possible and scum hunt.  So if a "slip" looks like it's been made (whether jumping on a wagon at the "wrong" time, or saying something that gives a scum-read), especially day-1, I'd be at least as inclined to suspect the person is Town, not Mafia - at least based on my experience playing Mafia in the past.  Again, this probably sounds self-defensive, but this has also been evident in my scum-reads (as weak and few as there have been) since the beginning - it's been more about responses and who references which other players (and how and when they do).
Logged
he/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #330 on: February 25, 2021, 02:00:33 am »

mathdude seems townie so far.
[...]

Mathdude had the obvious scummy post
I'm confused about how these two go together.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #331 on: February 25, 2021, 02:02:14 am »

vote: joth. I don't like the "he assumed he would be alive" argument and it looks like joth is taking the opportunity to jump on the wagon.
I mean... you jumping off the mathdude wagon for this is just exquisitely ironic.
Only if I jumped on the mathdude wagon as opportunistic scum. Since I actually jumped on as using-my-vote town, there is no particular irony here.

Okay, then it's ironic if joth's also town.

And scum!faust would know if we were both town...
No he wouldn'tr.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #332 on: February 25, 2021, 02:04:37 am »

MiX - even if this is "normal", it still comes across as scummy (and could be a good wall to hide behind)
What is "this"? Can you expand on your read here?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #333 on: February 25, 2021, 02:05:05 am »

@mathdude

There are no issues with your posts and cases sounding and being at least someone self-preservational at this point; it's to be expected.

Your point on MiX is fair and sensible.  The honest truth is MiX is always like this, which helps him tons when he's mafia and hurts town more when he's town.  That's just who he is.

gkrieg's absence is unfortunate, but I do think that makes him more likely to be town.  Does mafia!gkrieg know that he can skate by with a no-show Day 1?  Yeah, he does.  Does he actually do that?  I highly doubt it.  That's just from my experience though.

Your Dylan read is one with which I just have to disagree.  Dude is super-towny.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #334 on: February 25, 2021, 02:05:59 am »

One-liner-mostly-questions-no-content-D1-faust is like a fresh spring breeze in April.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #335 on: February 25, 2021, 02:23:20 am »

gkrieg's absence is unfortunate, but I do think that makes him more likely to be town.  Does mafia!gkrieg know that he can skate by with a no-show Day 1?  Yeah, he does.  Does he actually do that?  I highly doubt it.  That's just from my experience though.
I went and checked gkrieg's last scum game (coincidentally, M123, with you!). He had like 35 D1 posts there, not quite a no-show, but not very active either. I find it weird to turn this into an alignment tell one way or the other.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #336 on: February 25, 2021, 06:29:10 am »

I am finding myself disagreeing with Space more than usual. @Space, can you say why you had trouble reading mcmc's posts with a town narrative?

Sorry if this gets long, but I want to put the focus on those posts into some kind of context :-)

Rough structure of what went on, from an exceptionally Space-centric perspective:

1. On an early re-read, I thought mcmc was generally too confident in the case he was making. I was actually making that post (#210) in search of a better place to put my vote than my RVS mcmc vote, but honestly couldn't find anything much I scum-read at that point in the game. So for mcmc to be confident enough to argue against the counters on his own scum-read felt iffy to me. (That's all there is to it in terms of a simple answer to your question, EFHW, but why I brought the posts up again later in the game is where the more complicated bit comes in).

2. MiX actively disagreed with me on that, as is summarised in the upper part of his post at #233. So we can deduce from that that MiX thought mcmc was being townie in the posts he'd made before #210.

3. On a later re-read, I noticed that Robz had gone from expressing suspicion on mcmc at #191 and #193, to voting for me at #204, to totally unvoting at #220, without any comment on how his mcmc read had evolved in the meantime. One assumes that mcmc's intervening posts at #197, #199, and #201 may have some bearing on the evolving read, and those are a part of the content MiX and I had discussed.

4. Roughly at the same time as I notice that possible inconsistency, faust makes a sort of wagon-fishing attempt on MiX at #253. I'm always a bit wary of people asking for wagons without joining them, so I wanted to probe faust a bit at that point. Therefore, I asked faust at #259 whether Robz would be a better target for the alternative to the mathdude wagon that he claimed he wanted. I was deliberate in not elaborating my Robz thoughts at that point because I wanted faust's take, but annoyingly MiX also then butted into that part of the conversation.

5. I got a super-short and unengaged answer from faust, of course, and eventually posted my Robz-observation at #277.

6. Immediately at #288, MiX claims I have a good case on Robz. Which is ironic because a) he shouldn't have thought that, given that he was insistent on mcmc's towniness, b) he's totally oblivious to the fact I'm actually trying to engage with faust here, and just keeps reacting to everything without any apparent effort at processing.

7. I let my frustration with MiX come out at #280 where I pointed out that he shouldn't believe my case because he specifically already said those posts were townie.

8. MiX responds to me at #281 to ask if the content of the posts even matters. That would be the three posts that were made by mcmc, during the time in which Robz apparently loses a scumread on mcmc. In what imaginary MiX-universe don't the contents of those posts matter? At that point I lost the will to keep engaging with MiX and just left it hanging, because my intended replies were a little too much on the snarky side.

tl;dr I was trying to probe faust because I didn't like his wagon-hunting on MiX, and bringing up mcmc's posts again was mostly due to MiX getting in the way of that, and not actually to do with me being obsessed with three things mcmc said earlier in the game. I realise that for people not inside my own head, that may not have been quite so evident, though :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #337 on: February 25, 2021, 07:12:15 am »

MiX - even if this is "normal", it still comes across as scummy (and could be a good wall to hide behind)
What is "this"? Can you expand on your read here?

I meant exactly what ash said in the post after yours... MiX always seeming slightly scummy. And the fact that it helps him when he is scum, and slightly hurts town when he's town.
Logged
he/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #338 on: February 25, 2021, 08:11:26 am »

MiX - even if this is "normal", it still comes across as scummy (and could be a good wall to hide behind)
What is "this"? Can you expand on your read here?

I meant exactly what ash said in the post after yours... MiX always seeming slightly scummy. And the fact that it helps him when he is scum, and slightly hurts town when he's town.
How do you think he is slightly scummy? Please use your own words rather than someone else's.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #339 on: February 25, 2021, 08:14:00 am »

Are we... actually going to exile mathdude instead of running him up to E-1, forcing a claim, and then panic exiling someone else?

If so, great, let’s put it to bed.

If not, let’s get on with it so we have slightly more time for the bad panic exile (I nominate Robz).
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #340 on: February 25, 2021, 08:27:12 am »

6. Immediately at #288, MiX claims I have a good case on Robz. Which is ironic because a) he shouldn't have thought that, given that he was insistent on mcmc's towniness, b) he's totally oblivious to the fact I'm actually trying to engage with faust here, and just keeps reacting to everything without any apparent effort at processing.

7. I let my frustration with MiX come out at #280 where I pointed out that he shouldn't believe my case because he specifically already said those posts were townie.

8. MiX responds to me at #281 to ask if the content of the posts even matters. That would be the three posts that were made by mcmc, during the time in which Robz apparently loses a scumread on mcmc. In what imaginary MiX-universe don't the contents of those posts matter? At that point I lost the will to keep engaging with MiX and just left it hanging, because my intended replies were a little too much on the snarky side.

tl;dr I was trying to probe faust because I didn't like his wagon-hunting on MiX, and bringing up mcmc's posts again was mostly due to MiX getting in the way of that, and not actually to do with me being obsessed with three things mcmc said earlier in the game. I realise that for people not inside my own head, that may not have been quite so evident, though :-P

The mcmc posts don't matter in the Robz case: the fact that Robz did not say anything about them does. Regardless of how it changed Robz's read, since he said he had a scumread on mcmc, he should've said something, anything, about them. We now know that he found them townie and is not scumreading mcmc anymore, but that was after I said all that, and he still hasn't said how those posts affected his read. The mcmc posts looking townie, scummy, nully, whatever, to me doesn't change a single thing in how Robz reacted to them.

I butted in because I was looking for a new wagon, and I really liked what you had said, I thought, and still think, that it's a great case for scum!Robz.

MiX - even if this is "normal", it still comes across as scummy (and could be a good wall to hide behind)
What is "this"? Can you expand on your read here?

I meant exactly what ash said in the post after yours... MiX always seeming slightly scummy. And the fact that it helps him when he is scum, and slightly hurts town when he's town.

Ha! How would you know it hurts me when I'm town, and helps me when I'm scum? For all you know it's the other way around! And yes, it is the other way around, regardless of what anyone else says.

Are we... actually going to exile mathdude instead of running him up to E-1, forcing a claim, and then panic exiling someone else?

If so, great, let’s put it to bed.

If not, let’s get on with it so we have slightly more time for the bad panic exile (I nominate Robz).

I don't know man, your call. If you want to stick your vote on math to get a claim, so be it. You can just vote Robz now if you want to exile scum.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #341 on: February 25, 2021, 08:40:34 am »

Unfortunately my vote is already on math.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #342 on: February 25, 2021, 08:46:42 am »

Unfortunately my vote is already on math.

Fine, okay, let's do it.

Intent to vote math and put him at E-1
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #343 on: February 25, 2021, 09:23:56 am »

Well, ash is already on Math so the e-1 so that vote isn’t quite as dire as it would be if he wasn’t.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #344 on: February 25, 2021, 09:28:27 am »

Another random thing that supports the Robz/MiX team plan -- MiX's vote on Robz is the safest bus ever, as Robz wasn't getting (and probably still isn't getting) exiled on D1.

I agree with this. But in subsequent posts he seems to be leaning way more into Robz. Maybe MiX distancing genius? Or authentic scum!robz vibes? Hard to know...
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #345 on: February 25, 2021, 09:54:47 am »

mathdude seems townie so far.
[...]

Mathdude had the obvious scummy post
I'm confused about how these two go together.

It’s the Result of writing a single post while rereading the whole day. I think he is slightly townier than scummier.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #346 on: February 25, 2021, 10:15:21 am »

Vote: MiX

I'm one of the people who thinks that even town!MiX is kind of a gift to scum sometimes, and I'm not sure this is town!MiX. There's just too much flaily posting.

Still not sold on mathdude's scumminess being so much alignment-indicative than newbie-indicative that I want to jump on there, but I'm not so averse to it that I wouldn't move my vote to get an exile through. I remember that it took time to adapt to this version of mafia over the flipless werewolf I used to play, and in particular I felt pressured to be very defensive, and took it really seriously if I was under pressure, which I think probably made my play read even worse to a lot of people (hi gkrieg!), so I have sympathy with that.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #347 on: February 25, 2021, 10:16:51 am »

Space Count:

mathdude (5): Dylan32, faust, jotheonah, EFHW, ashersky
jotheonah (1): mcmcsalot
Robz888 (1): MiX
MiX (4): gkrieg13, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnemone
EFHW (1): Robz888
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #348 on: February 25, 2021, 10:22:20 am »

Vote: MiX

I'm one of the people who thinks that even town!MiX is kind of a gift to scum sometimes, and I'm not sure this is town!MiX. There's just too much flaily posting.

Still not sold on mathdude's scumminess being so much alignment-indicative than newbie-indicative that I want to jump on there, but I'm not so averse to it that I wouldn't move my vote to get an exile through. I remember that it took time to adapt to this version of mafia over the flipless werewolf I used to play, and in particular I felt pressured to be very defensive, and took it really seriously if I was under pressure, which I think probably made my play read even worse to a lot of people (hi gkrieg!), so I have sympathy with that.

if Math flips scum this post is massive.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #349 on: February 25, 2021, 10:24:02 am »

Vote: MiX

I'm one of the people who thinks that even town!MiX is kind of a gift to scum sometimes, and I'm not sure this is town!MiX. There's just too much flaily posting.

Yeah you be in my position, everyone disagreeing with all of my reads, pushing the new guy instead of my scumreads, can't even talk about starting a wagon without getting scumread and now I'm the counterwagon to math. You'd be flailing too.

Look at the VC: what is that. Every single wagon is an easy D1 exile. Why do we even talk D1 if we already know the result?
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #350 on: February 25, 2021, 10:28:51 am »

I'd rather exile MiX than mathdude.

Vote: MiX
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #351 on: February 25, 2021, 10:30:06 am »

I'd rather exile MiX than mathdude.

Vote: MiX

Yeah no shit.

Vote: math, that's E-1

Good job everyone. What a horrible EoD.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #352 on: February 25, 2021, 10:33:52 am »

everyone disagreeing with all of my reads, pushing the new guy instead of my scumreads

A few posts ago you were acknowledging having barged into my attempt to question faust because you were casting about for a new wagon to have scureads on...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #353 on: February 25, 2021, 10:35:55 am »

everyone disagreeing with all of my reads, pushing the new guy instead of my scumreads

A few posts ago you were acknowledging having barged into my attempt to question faust because you were casting about for a new wagon to have scureads on...

How is that contradictory?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #354 on: February 25, 2021, 10:43:17 am »

Why was ash saying that E-1 is equivalent to hammer?
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #355 on: February 25, 2021, 10:45:50 am »

Why was ash saying that E-1 is equivalent to hammer?

Presumably because he is unable to contain himself and has to hammer things...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #356 on: February 25, 2021, 10:48:08 am »

everyone disagreeing with all of my reads, pushing the new guy instead of my scumreads

A few posts ago you were acknowledging having barged into my attempt to question faust because you were casting about for a new wagon to have scureads on...

How is that contradictory?

I feel like lamenting the fact that nobody follows your scumreads, and then also saying that you did something specifically because you needed a new scumread seems a bit contradictory. What am I missing?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #357 on: February 25, 2021, 10:51:41 am »

Another Space count, since it's interesting:

mathdude (6): Dylan32, faust, jotheonah, EFHW, ashersky, MiX
jotheonah (1): mcmcsalot
MiX (5): gkrieg13, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnemone, Robz888

Also relevant: the deadline is 22:40 forum time tomorrow, which is the middle of the night for me, faust and MiX at least.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #358 on: February 25, 2021, 10:53:07 am »

Also relevant: the deadline is 22:40 forum time tomorrow, which is the middle of the night for me, faust and MiX at least.

Assuming people are still in the countries I think they're in. I realise it's been a while...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #359 on: February 25, 2021, 11:05:41 am »

everyone disagreeing with all of my reads, pushing the new guy instead of my scumreads

A few posts ago you were acknowledging having barged into my attempt to question faust because you were casting about for a new wagon to have scureads on...

How is that contradictory?

I feel like lamenting the fact that nobody follows your scumreads, and then also saying that you did something specifically because you needed a new scumread seems a bit contradictory. What am I missing?

Okay, yes, I don't have a lot of scumreads.

Sigh, maybe you're right. But there were like no wagons other than math's.
Logged

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #360 on: February 25, 2021, 12:18:06 pm »

Are we... actually going to exile mathdude instead of running him up to E-1, forcing a claim, and then panic exiling someone else?

If so, great, let’s put it to bed.

If not, let’s get on with it so we have slightly more time for the bad panic exile (I nominate Robz).

So is this the way things work here?  Run up to E-1, force a claim, and decide from there?  Also, why Robz as a "panic exile"?  I mean, MiX is pretty close already, so let's just go there!

Vote: MiX

I'm one of the people who thinks that even town!MiX is kind of a gift to scum sometimes, and I'm not sure this is town!MiX. There's just too much flaily posting.

Still not sold on mathdude's scumminess being so much alignment-indicative than newbie-indicative that I want to jump on there, but I'm not so averse to it that I wouldn't move my vote to get an exile through. I remember that it took time to adapt to this version of mafia over the flipless werewolf I used to play, and in particular I felt pressured to be very defensive, and took it really seriously if I was under pressure, which I think probably made my play read even worse to a lot of people (hi gkrieg!), so I have sympathy with that.

if Math flips scum this post is massive.

Math doesn't flip scum.  Math shouldn't flip at all tonight, because ... well... umm...
I wish I could just rely on the new guy thing and go back to a day-1 pass, but that's not in the spirit of the game.  And that's why I didn't just sit around and observe.  I've been as active as I can, trying to be involved.  And apparently I don't follow all your conventions.  I'll learn and adapt slightly over my first few games.

Another Space count, since it's interesting:

mathdude (6): Dylan32, faust, jotheonah, EFHW, ashersky, MiX
jotheonah (1): mcmcsalot
MiX (5): gkrieg13, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnemone, Robz888

Also relevant: the deadline is 22:40 forum time tomorrow, which is the middle of the night for me, faust and MiX at least.

Well, it looks like my hand has been forced.  Earlier, in the discussion about why I "know" I'll be around day-2 (side note - I don't know, I was just hoping, and want to be able to use some of the information that might come out after night-1 to help figure things out), there were 3 option given... sorry, I'm not going to look for and quote the post.
1. scum
2. PR
3. VT trying to draw the night kill to protect power roles

I'm not scum.  And I'm not going to claim VT... maybe if I had not posted quite so much, or dropped breadcrumbs, I could have claimed this.  But I can't.  Infer as you may.

What I am saying is that I need to get a little info about who is most likely to be scum.  I'm more useful that way.  And I'm not just talking about who we want to vote for.  I need better read who is the most dangerous this game.

Is that enough info?  Or does scum want to try to draw more out of me?  I'm sorry if this means a bodyguard (assuming we have one... having 2-5 PRs and IC isn't one of them) is wasted/used up if I do make it through this vote.  But I'm more valuable alive than dead, I hope.
Logged
he/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #361 on: February 25, 2021, 12:50:23 pm »

Huh, at this stage you've pretty much outed yourself as scum or a strong scum target, so I'm not sure the benefit of keeping your specific role quiet outweighs the twin benefits of firstly saying exactly what it is so that town can collectively suggest targets and secondly being forced to say what it is so that if you're E-1 scum having to pick a claim, then at least we have a chance of outing you through forcing you to guess at something someone could counterclaim.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #362 on: February 25, 2021, 12:51:35 pm »

I really think we should not exile mathdude, guys.

MiX is a great exile because at worst, we exiled MiX.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #363 on: February 25, 2021, 12:53:18 pm »

Swowl, could you confirm whether it's possible in your interpretation of this set-up for us to have multiple copies of the same town role?

I think it isn't technically forbidden in the setup text, it's just that I read it and assumed that the "selected from" in the town roles is done without replacement...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #364 on: February 25, 2021, 12:54:53 pm »

I'm pretty sure there can't be multiple copies.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #365 on: February 25, 2021, 01:04:57 pm »

Ok, that claim leads me to believe it was an indirect claim of a specific role. If I'm right, I don't think I want to unvote because it's the best of the options for scum to fakeclaim. If I'm actually wrong, I would move. So I think at this point, like Space said, you should probably just be specific.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #366 on: February 25, 2021, 01:06:34 pm »

Intent to make someone hammer math

That's a traitor claim if I've ever seen one.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #367 on: February 25, 2021, 01:09:13 pm »

I'll try to clarify myself:

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Ok, so your vote isn't really "no reason", is it?

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

I can play that game too.  I'll follow up my FoS with
vote: Dylan32

I believe this post means that math is traitor and that joth is scum. The second scum would then be Robz I believe, but I'm not sure, I tried to disassociate those reads. Regardless, we should exile math.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #368 on: February 25, 2021, 01:11:17 pm »

Scumteam: Joth/Robz, with math as traitor.

Calling the scumteam D1, I still got it. Don't doubt me, doubt yourselves, town!MiX's pro-town, even if it doesn't look like it at first.

I really think we should not exile mathdude, guys.

MiX is a great exile because at worst, we exiled MiX.

Nice try, but you know that's wrong.

Hahaha, triple posting and being confident, this is what I missed this entire day! I'm on fire!
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #369 on: February 25, 2021, 01:13:30 pm »

Intent to hammer

ppe mix how does robz tie into your team theory?
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #370 on: February 25, 2021, 01:14:02 pm »

Intent to hammer

ppe mix how does robz tie into your team theory?

He's pushing me and defending math, seems simple enough. I also think he's scum, so it all fits together.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #371 on: February 25, 2021, 01:14:52 pm »

I'm not saying he's right, but those last 3 messages are exactly what my meta memory has stored for town!mix, if only he hadn't brought attention to being self-aware about it with his very last line... That tempers the feeling a little bit.

ppe 2
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #372 on: February 25, 2021, 01:17:32 pm »

I'm not saying he's right, but those last 3 messages are exactly what my meta memory has stored for town!mix, if only he hadn't brought attention to being self-aware about it with his very last line... That tempers the feeling a little bit.

ppe 2

MiX would never allow himself to do a play that locks him town! Knowing my exact thought process is better than leaving that bit of self-awareness out, leaving people to question if I was. This way you know I was, and that I decided to say that I was.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #373 on: February 25, 2021, 01:22:43 pm »

Wait a second, one of the points that Ash (iirc) made earlier was that mathdude sounded like he assumed he'd be alive later. That would line up with MiX's thoughts here because the traitor is 1-shot BP.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #374 on: February 25, 2021, 01:25:22 pm »

Intent to make someone hammer math

That's a traitor claim if I've ever seen one.
Seconded.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #375 on: February 25, 2021, 01:45:11 pm »

Mafia traitor would be rough role to pull first time out (or first time out in a new community). All the detriment of being scum, but without anyone to coach you.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #376 on: February 25, 2021, 01:45:56 pm »

Vote: Mathdude

In retrospect the post math made about town power roles screams of traitor as well.

Well, some people are active enough that I could find "reasons" I think pretty much any of them could be scum or reasons any of them could be town.  However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.  Town, we have to carefully use any PR's to make sure the results can be useful not only individually, but also in how the results may interact with those interactions... if that makes any sense.  (Getting a read on someone is helpful... but getting a read on someone that you're fairly certain is connected to another someone can be even more useful).

But now I'm torn between 2 options.  Do we try to vote someone out who we have mild suspicions of, who we can actually connect their reveal-on-exile to the statements made by others about them on day-1?  Or do we just go for the less active lurkers, to make sure they don't just hide through a couple days?

Yeah, sorry! Started a re-read of everyone earlier, but didn't finish it before the evening's social calls, and now it's past bedtime. Still have notes in another tab, but it will have to wait till tomorrow at this point. My sanity is on a lot thinner ground than it was in the beforetimes, so bedtime needs to be that bit more strict :-(

vote: Space
Reason: post more!
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #377 on: February 25, 2021, 02:00:32 pm »

That's the hammer?

Mathdude, regardless of your status, it has been awesome playing with you and I hope that you will play with us again soon!!  It really is great to have new folks join us.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #378 on: February 25, 2021, 02:10:17 pm »

That's the hammer?

Mathdude, regardless of your status, it has been awesome playing with you and I hope that you will play with us again soon!!  It really is great to have new folks join us.

Seconded. You have a bright future here.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #379 on: February 25, 2021, 02:10:36 pm »

also c'mon flipflipflipflipflip
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #380 on: February 25, 2021, 02:11:22 pm »

If I've read the rules/setup correctly, I believe I can still talk until a certain point... hammer down and flip to night are 2 different things.

Huh, at this stage you've pretty much outed yourself as scum or a strong scum target, so I'm not sure the benefit of keeping your specific role quiet outweighs the twin benefits of firstly saying exactly what it is so that town can collectively suggest targets and secondly being forced to say what it is so that if you're E-1 scum having to pick a claim, then at least we have a chance of outing you through forcing you to guess at something someone could counterclaim.

Sorry, town, I just don't know what your standards are here.  I'm used to still being vague when "claiming". and it appears I should not have done that.  Also, Real Life is a terrible thing.  It hasn't even been 2 hours since I somewhat-claimed.  And there wasn't an opportunity for me to address this issue (not knowing I should fully claim) since "intent to hammer" and "hammer" were only about 30 minutes apart.

I could see doing that if we were a few hours to end-of-day.  But it's still well over 24 hours away.  Definitely look at the opportunistic moves some people took!  We had time to sort this out (and wait for a full claim and a chance to counter-claim), but it got rushed... probably intentionally.

And now, having been officially exiled, as far as I can tell, with no chance of reversing... you have lost your roleblocker.  It could have been a useful role, but I would have needed a decent read on who to block.
Logged
he/him

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #381 on: February 25, 2021, 02:12:17 pm »

also c'mon flipflipflipflipflip

You really don't want me to have a chance to respond to this quick hammer, do you?  What are you trying to hide?  Youscum?
Logged
he/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #382 on: February 25, 2021, 02:14:15 pm »

also c'mon flipflipflipflipflip

You really don't want me to have a chance to respond to this quick hammer, do you?  What are you trying to hide?  Youscum?

I just wanted the info. But now I have it. Any chance you're trolling us?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #383 on: February 25, 2021, 02:15:00 pm »

No trolling.  I would have been much more subtle and careful if I was mafia (or traitor).
Logged
he/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #384 on: February 25, 2021, 02:17:11 pm »


you have lost your roleblocker.

You should have fullclaimed. Or not claimed to be a PR at all.

Have fun in speccy!
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #385 on: February 25, 2021, 02:17:54 pm »

Yeah, the half hour intent to hammer/hammer combo is a bit tricky in the middle of a workday.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #386 on: February 25, 2021, 02:43:54 pm »

Assuming you are telling the truth, I can’t even point to anything you did “wrong” that isn’t explained by being the first game in a new community. I totally agree with joth that if you stick around, I have a feeling you’re gonna have some success around here.

I didn’t hate the initial partial claim. That was more of a specific confluence of setup, claim, and reads that led me to think you should full claim before backing off, and I wish you had gotten the chance to do so, because honestly I was wrong about which role I thought you were crumbing...
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #387 on: February 25, 2021, 02:45:27 pm »


you have lost your roleblocker.

You should have fullclaimed. Or not claimed to be a PR at all.

Have fun in speccy!

Cold
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #388 on: February 25, 2021, 03:03:46 pm »


you have lost your roleblocker.

You should have fullclaimed. Or not claimed to be a PR at all.

Have fun in speccy!

Cold

Well yeah I am cold. I just killed math. I could've died instead of taking the roleblocker, but I went all in on a read I got at the start of the game.

I hate this D1 so much. Good job scum.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #389 on: February 25, 2021, 03:06:52 pm »

Where did the warm and fuzzy MiX go??
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #390 on: February 25, 2021, 03:10:33 pm »


you have lost your roleblocker.

You should have fullclaimed. Or not claimed to be a PR at all.

Have fun in speccy!

Cold

Well yeah I am cold. I just killed math. I could've died instead of taking the roleblocker, but I went all in on a read I got at the start of the game.

I hate this D1 so much. Good job scum.

Let's rate the authenticity of this outrage on a scale of 1 to 10.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #391 on: February 25, 2021, 03:11:43 pm »

Vote Count 1.7:

mathdude (7): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW, MiX, MCMC
MiX (5): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnenome, Robz888
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it took 7 to Exile.
Night 1 starts now and ends Saturday, February 27th at 3:12pm Forum Time.
Night actions are due in 36 hours.


THREAD LOCKED!

Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #392 on: February 25, 2021, 03:19:30 pm »

"It's mathdude! It has to be mathdude!"
   "Yes! They just show up out of no where and all of a sudden this starts happening???"
"But what of MiX? They are acting so unusual here!"
   "No! I have had enough of this... I am pulling the plug on mathdude..."


mathdude has been exiled! They were mathdude, the Town Aligned Roleblocker.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2021, 01:32:47 am by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #393 on: February 25, 2021, 03:34:05 pm »

Swowl, could you confirm whether it's possible in your interpretation of this set-up for us to have multiple copies of the same town role?

Fair question. The setup does in fact leave room for interpretation.
The way this specific game was set up - It is impossible for there to be multiple copies of the same town role.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Night 1
« Reply #394 on: February 27, 2021, 05:54:30 pm »

"Alright. Good morning everyone, time to get back at it. It seems we are short a few people...."




Robz888 has died at night! They were Robz888, the Town Bodyguard.

MCMCsalot has died at night! They were MCMCsalot, the Mafia JOAT.[/b]
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Night 1
« Reply #395 on: February 27, 2021, 05:54:41 pm »

Vote Count 2.0:

Not Voting (9): WestCoastDidds, MiX, EFHW, faust, gkrieg, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 starts now and ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.

THREAD UNLOCKED!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #396 on: February 27, 2021, 05:58:38 pm »

Nice shot! And chairs isn't even in this game...

There's a bunch to analyze with these flips but I won't have time to go into it at the moment.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #397 on: February 27, 2021, 06:12:57 pm »

Woah, both brother are dead. But hey, the vig got mcmc, hell yeah!

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

So, where do we start today?
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #398 on: February 27, 2021, 07:07:16 pm »

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Robz was voting you at the end of D1. Unless I missed an unchallenged PR claim from you in the closing moments of D1, I see nothing that makes scum want to target you at all. Hint: this is not the time to be claiming PRs.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

Mcmc was a lucky RVS I didn't quite shake when looking for better scum possibilities. Most of what I said pointed out how inconsistent and anti-town some of your play was. Or also pointing out that the correct play at the end of D1 would have been to force a possible-scum-mathdude into being pinned to a falsifiable claim, which I think would have been the correct townie play, hence pushing for it. What went down instead was a load of rushed nonsense, except that of course mcmc was playing it correctly for his wincon.

So, where do we start today?

I honestly quite like Vote: MiX.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #399 on: February 27, 2021, 07:13:29 pm »

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Robz was voting you at the end of D1. Unless I missed an unchallenged PR claim from you in the closing moments of D1, I see nothing that makes scum want to target you at all. Hint: this is not the time to be claiming PRs.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

Mcmc was a lucky RVS I didn't quite shake when looking for better scum possibilities. Most of what I said pointed out how inconsistent and anti-town some of your play was. Or also pointing out that the correct play at the end of D1 would have been to force a possible-scum-mathdude into being pinned to a falsifiable claim, which I think would have been the correct townie play, hence pushing for it. What went down instead was a load of rushed nonsense, except that of course mcmc was playing it correctly for his wincon.

So, where do we start today?

I honestly quite like Vote: MiX.

I'm not letting you fight your way out of being locktown. Math fought his way out of a day pass, and look what happened. Read your D1, you fought against mcmc harder than anyone, and indirectly too, why would scum ever do this?

You could vote for scum instead. That vote's pointless.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #400 on: February 27, 2021, 07:15:33 pm »

I’m taking Monday off work because it’s my birthday. So I will probably spend some of it te-reading day 1 for nuggets of truth. But that’s days away.

Scum loves to target each other day 1? Idk that that’s as locky as you think.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #401 on: February 27, 2021, 07:19:58 pm »

Woah, both brother are dead. But hey, the vig got mcmc, hell yeah!

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

So, where do we start today?

I really think we should not exile mathdude, guys.

MiX is a great exile because at worst, we exiled MiX.

Well, in honor of Robz's reads, Vote: MiX seems like a decent starting point.

ppe 3 got distracted watching Fallon wheel of impression clips while writing this.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #402 on: February 27, 2021, 07:23:10 pm »

Woah, both brother are dead. But hey, the vig got mcmc, hell yeah!

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

So, where do we start today?

I really think we should not exile mathdude, guys.

MiX is a great exile because at worst, we exiled MiX.

Well, in honor of Robz's reads, Vote: MiX seems like a decent starting point.

ppe 3 got distracted watching Fallon wheel of impression clips while writing this.

You're...kidding, right.

Okay I'm just gonna ignore people's first reactions for now and finish the VC.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #403 on: February 27, 2021, 07:24:37 pm »

You could vote for scum instead. That vote's pointless.

Other than mcmc, you're the one who most escalated mathdude's claim scenario to a sudden exile. You don't get to brush that under the carpet just by complementing my play in voting for mcmc.

For my own records, the other two who don't come out of that looking good are faust, who seconded MiX's "intent to make someone hammer", and Dylan, who came in with a very weak "Wait a second" post that then merely supported MiX.

PPE 2
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #404 on: February 27, 2021, 07:26:23 pm »

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #405 on: February 27, 2021, 07:28:28 pm »

Note for anyone else doing homework on mcmc: in addition to the games currently listed in his sig, mcmc was scum in M119.

(This is definitely not me complaining about a sig's game records being out of date, because my own attempt is terrible...)
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #406 on: February 27, 2021, 07:37:39 pm »

You could vote for scum instead. That vote's pointless.

Other than mcmc, you're the one who most escalated mathdude's claim scenario to a sudden exile. You don't get to brush that under the carpet just by complementing my play in voting for mcmc.

For my own records, the other two who don't come out of that looking good are faust, who seconded MiX's "intent to make someone hammer", and Dylan, who came in with a very weak "Wait a second" post that then merely supported MiX.

PPE 2

 I actually originally thought mathdude was setting up a vig claim, which I thought would be the scummiest of the possible claims, so I wasn't going to back off his wagon until after he full claimed no matter what. Once MiX mentioned traitor though, I read back through and some of the stuff made sense through that lens and I shared why I thought so.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #407 on: February 27, 2021, 07:39:56 pm »

Note for anyone else doing homework on mcmc: in addition to the games currently listed in his sig, mcmc was scum in M119.

(This is definitely not me complaining about a sig's game records being out of date, because my own attempt is terrible...)

On that subject, I can't believe your last scum game hasn't been added to your sig yet lol
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #408 on: February 27, 2021, 07:53:32 pm »

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

I just stumbled upon this post: hmm, Dylan was already voting for math...

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.

Vote: Dylan, I also find his play overall scummy, and it's a good SoD2 vote regardless.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #409 on: February 27, 2021, 08:27:15 pm »

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

I just stumbled upon this post: hmm, Dylan was already voting for math...

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.

Vote: Dylan, I also find his play overall scummy, and it's a good SoD2 vote regardless.

Just double checked you, because I really thought I had unvoted since my first vote was just for fun in RVS, but you're right, I hadn't. Well, that was the moment it became a real read instead of an RVS holdover, so I stand by the post either way.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #410 on: February 27, 2021, 11:47:01 pm »

Nice shot! And chairs isn't even in this game...

There's a bunch to analyze with these flips but I won't have time to go into it at the moment.

Hi and what he said.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #411 on: February 28, 2021, 02:07:20 am »

Feeling very good about my MiX tunneling end of D1 right now. Vote: MiX
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #412 on: February 28, 2021, 04:37:47 am »

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.
Pfft, that wagon never picked up any steam and would have been an easy bus.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #413 on: February 28, 2021, 04:39:15 am »

Well, in honor of Robz's reads, Vote: MiX seems like a decent starting point.
If you wanted to honor Robz's reads, you'd vote for EFHW.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #414 on: February 28, 2021, 04:40:57 am »

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.
Well done with the misrepresenting. The mcmc wagon "growing" was me putting a third vote on it. But then my mathdude vote is supposed to be in reaction to that? Because I got scared of my own vote?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #415 on: February 28, 2021, 04:45:14 am »

Question for the MiX voters: What exactly do you think was going on at the end of D1, with MiX urging the hammer and mcmc executing it?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #416 on: February 28, 2021, 06:20:47 am »

I've been wondering whether we could make any determination on who Robz might have protected so they can be town, but unfortunately it seems rather likely that he was a direct hit, especially with mcmc being scum.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #417 on: February 28, 2021, 06:46:30 am »

Feeling very good about my MiX tunneling end of D1 right now. Vote: MiX

Words cannot describe what I'm feeling right now.

That's E-2 by the way.

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.
Well done with the misrepresenting. The mcmc wagon "growing" was me putting a third vote on it. But then my mathdude vote is supposed to be in reaction to that? Because I got scared of my own vote?

I think you can see a misexile from a mile way, I mean, look how quickly math's wagon grew. Seems better than a bus to me.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #418 on: February 28, 2021, 07:04:14 am »

You could vote for scum instead. That vote's pointless.

Other than mcmc, you're the one who most escalated mathdude's claim scenario to a sudden exile. You don't get to brush that under the carpet just by complementing my play in voting for mcmc.

I'll brush it off as "I'm the counterwagon". Look at EoD1: I was playing self-pres all the way.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #419 on: February 28, 2021, 07:36:42 am »

Cool.  Cool cool cool.

Busy at the moment but will be on in maybe 12 hours or so in earnest.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #420 on: February 28, 2021, 07:44:46 am »

Vote: gkrieg
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #421 on: February 28, 2021, 09:07:19 am »

You could vote for scum instead. That vote's pointless.

Other than mcmc, you're the one who most escalated mathdude's claim scenario to a sudden exile. You don't get to brush that under the carpet just by complementing my play in voting for mcmc.

I'll brush it off as "I'm the counterwagon". Look at EoD1: I was playing self-pres all the way.

Huh. So can you explain what on earth this following bit was about?

I'll try to clarify myself:

So........

I still don't think it makes sense for mafia to take a lot of PRs! That was a true thing I said previously.

That's a great thing to say if you're mafia and took a bunch of PRs!

You're doing it wrong, this is how you do RVS...

Vote: mathdude

See? No reason, no suspicion, just a vote for the sake of voting.

Ok, so your vote isn't really "no reason", is it?

FoS: Dylan32
Reason: no longer Innocent Child... also, RVS.

I can play that game too.  I'll follow up my FoS with
vote: Dylan32

I believe this post means that math is traitor and that joth is scum. The second scum would then be Robz I believe, but I'm not sure, I tried to disassociate those reads. Regardless, we should exile math.

You claimed you were clarifying yourself, but you said nothing that had any sort of evidence at all to back up your claim that mathdude was making a partial traitor claim. Not only that, but you called a scumteam that included joth, citing as evidence (but without explanation) a conversation that neither involved joth nor even mentioned him. Can you clarify your clarification by pointing out exactly what bits of text where meant what to you?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #422 on: February 28, 2021, 09:35:11 am »

Mobile so no quote.

See the posts after that one, I vote joth and then explain why I did. My read at the time was that math was following joth's suggestion perfectly, which makes a lot of sense with math being traitor and joth being scum.

But me quoting that EoD1 was self-pres, I still thought math was town, I just quoted the scummiest post of his (in my mind) to convince myself that he could be scum, so I would have the drive to keep pushing on him. Before his flip, I didn't really have a strong enough scumread to want to push at EoD1, and even if I did, chances were I was getting exiled if math was saved, so I thought that essencially throwing math under the bus was right.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #423 on: February 28, 2021, 09:37:54 am »

Well, in honor of Robz's reads, Vote: MiX seems like a decent starting point.
If you wanted to honor Robz's reads, you'd vote for EFHW.

Why not MiX, whom Robz voted for after EFHW, and even with a snarky postscript:

MiX is a great exile because at worst, we exiled MiX.

And in response to this:

Question for the MiX voters: What exactly do you think was going on at the end of D1, with MiX urging the hammer and mcmc executing it?

It wasn't nearly deadline yet, and MiX was creating an artificial sense of urgency, which mcmc was capitalising on. MiX was taking a clearly terrible course of action in pushing for an immediate exile without thinking through any of the consequences of the claim or how to tease information out of it properly. He was totally failing to engage with posts from people like me or Robz, saying that we should hold off on mathdude, or sort the partial claim out more sensibly. He was reacting to almost everything except those voice-of-reason posts, and claiming he was "on fire" while doing so. If we want not to exile MiX, please convince me that letting him remain in the game to continue that kind of play is actually beneficial to my town wincon.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #424 on: February 28, 2021, 09:52:26 am »

Mobile so no quote.

See the posts after that one, I vote joth and then explain why I did. My read at the time was that math was following joth's suggestion perfectly, which makes a lot of sense with math being traitor and joth being scum.

Please just come back and re-answer this later when you can quote, because you don'tvote joth the post after the one I've quoted, or make any mention that I can see of mathdude sheeping joth.

I find it really unhelpful of you to expect everyone else to have to put in the time and effort of piecing together what you're talking about. It would be much more pro-town to get you more used to feeling obliged to make sensible, evidence-backed posts that don't require that much of everyone else's time to understand.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #425 on: February 28, 2021, 09:55:54 am »

I still thought math was town, I just quoted the scummiest post of his (in my mind) to convince myself that he could be scum, so I would have the drive to keep pushing on him. Before his flip, I didn't really have a strong enough scumread to want to push at EoD1, and even if I did, chances were I was getting exiled if math was saved, so I thought that essencially throwing math under the bus was right.

For any other player, I'd read this as a subtle claim of some kind of good PR, because otherwise why on earth would you try to get someone you believe to be a town PR exiled over yourself?? Is it a PR claim coming from  MiX though? I suspect even VT!MiX would put his survival over the good of town. Anyone else want to weigh in on that?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #426 on: February 28, 2021, 10:25:30 am »

Mobile so no quote.

See the posts after that one, I vote joth and then explain why I did. My read at the time was that math was following joth's suggestion perfectly, which makes a lot of sense with math being traitor and joth being scum.

Please just come back and re-answer this later when you can quote, because you don'tvote joth the post after the one I've quoted, or make any mention that I can see of mathdude sheeping joth.

I find it really unhelpful of you to expect everyone else to have to put in the time and effort of piecing together what you're talking about. It would be much more pro-town to get you more used to feeling obliged to make sensible, evidence-backed posts that don't require that much of everyone else's time to understand.

After the post that I quoted. Math's early D1 post. Are you trying to compete with me for low effort posts?
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #427 on: February 28, 2021, 10:49:15 am »

I did an EFHW re-read, and I thought my d1 impression of her was that she was at least thinking for herself and not coming over as too scummy. She does flip-flop a bit on how much sympathy she shows for our newbie's predicament, though (#188/#237/#317), which let her put her vote in a convenient place on the mathdude wagon.

Possibly more interesting is the really early game, because she followed mcmc onto Robz before Robz had even joined the game. On its own that's nothing, but then she was also right behind mcmc on Joth from #273, which is the pivot in the middle of her flip-flop on mathdude, which maybe looks a little bit more like something.

Of course, the next thing in this like of thinking is to check who else followed mcmc that much, and how common it was across the rest of d1 for two players to land up next to each other on wagons like that by chance (or design?) anyway.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #428 on: February 28, 2021, 11:57:06 am »

I’m not voting anywhere until I have time to sit down tomorrow and re-read, but the MiX wagon crowd is making some sense to me.

I highly doubt scum!Space pushes town!MiX this hard at the start of D2, so I’m inclined to agree Space is town (which doesn’t mean MiX is scum, but does mean I’m comfortable taking Space’s posts at face value). Potential WIFOM notwithstanding.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #429 on: February 28, 2021, 11:58:29 am »

I’m not voting anywhere until I have time to sit down tomorrow and re-read, but the MiX wagon crowd is making some sense to me.

I highly doubt scum!Space pushes town!MiX this hard at the start of D2, so I’m inclined to agree Space is town (which doesn’t mean MiX is scum, but does mean I’m comfortable taking Space’s posts at face value). Potential WIFOM notwithstanding.

Thank you joth! If you had to name someone as scum, who would it be? And just this once, I'm fine if you think I'm that someone.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #430 on: February 28, 2021, 02:49:07 pm »

Vote Count 2.1:

MiX (3): SpaceAnenome, Dylan32, gkrieg
Dylan32 (1): MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
Not Voting (4): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, Joth, Ashersky


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #431 on: February 28, 2021, 03:21:41 pm »

Well, in honor of Robz's reads, Vote: MiX seems like a decent starting point.
If you wanted to honor Robz's reads, you'd vote for EFHW.

Why not MiX, whom Robz voted for after EFHW, and even with a snarky postscript:

MiX is a great exile because at worst, we exiled MiX.
Because voting someone after another vote does not indicate that you find them scummier. Robz's  MiX vote was clearly a consolidation vote and it's weird for you to try to frame it as something else.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #432 on: February 28, 2021, 10:06:29 pm »

I did an EFHW re-read, and I thought my d1 impression of her was that she was at least thinking for herself and not coming over as too scummy. She does flip-flop a bit on how much sympathy she shows for our newbie's predicament, though (#188/#237/#317), which let her put her vote in a convenient place on the mathdude wagon.

I would say this differently. I gave him the benefit of the doubt after his defense, but when he didn't contribute further and posted this, which I found super scummy, he seemed like a good bet for scum.

Quote
Possibly more interesting is the really early game, because she followed mcmc onto Robz before Robz had even joined the game. On its own that's nothing, but then she was also right behind mcmc on Joth from #273, which is the pivot in the middle of her flip-flop on mathdude, which maybe looks a little bit more like something.

My Robz vote was RVS. Following someone who turns out to be scum seems NAI to me. If we were partners, I'd want to distance rather than act in concert that way, except for WIFOM.

Quote
Of course, the next thing in this like of thinking is to check who else followed mcmc that much, and how common it was across the rest of d1 for two players to land up next to each other on wagons like that by chance (or design?) anyway.

Why pursue this line of investigation? It doesn't seem likely to be informative for the reasons I just gave. Unless you want to give towncred for following mcmc, but I don't think that's what you are suggesting.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #433 on: February 28, 2021, 10:26:30 pm »

I'm not buying the MiX wagon. Given that he was the alternate wagon, his voting mathdude to E-1 seems logical. Then 3 hours went by before hammer. Mcmc was scummy in not waiting to hear from mathdude, but he was scum, after all, and ended up vigged probably at least in part because of the quickhammer. imo, mathdude was scummy and got himself exiled.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #434 on: March 01, 2021, 05:30:01 am »

Vote: gkrieg, sheeping faust.

Didds, joth, ash, are you alive? I guess it's the middle of the night for americans, but still.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #435 on: March 01, 2021, 06:25:07 am »

Vote: gkrieg, sheeping faust.

Didds, joth, ash, are you alive? I guess it's the middle of the night for americans, but still.
It seems that we're the only ones around, again. So let's use this time for a question: From your perspective, what was going through mcmc's head when he decided to hammer mathdude?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #436 on: March 01, 2021, 06:39:30 am »

Vote: gkrieg, sheeping faust.

Didds, joth, ash, are you alive? I guess it's the middle of the night for americans, but still.
It seems that we're the only ones around, again. So let's use this time for a question: From your perspective, what was going through mcmc's head when he decided to hammer mathdude?

Hmm, that's a hard question. I don't think it was optimal scum thoughts since he got vigged. But if I had to guess, I'd say "let's hammer a PR, using MiX's hard push on him to not instantly get flak and shutdown conversation".

Very interesting question, I would be thinking about this more if he wasn't dead already. I don't think it relates to other scumbuddies though, the only person alive that it relates to seems to be me.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #437 on: March 01, 2021, 06:52:58 am »

Vote: gkrieg, sheeping faust.

Didds, joth, ash, are you alive? I guess it's the middle of the night for americans, but still.
It seems that we're the only ones around, again. So let's use this time for a question: From your perspective, what was going through mcmc's head when he decided to hammer mathdude?

Hmm, that's a hard question. I don't think it was optimal scum thoughts since he got vigged. But if I had to guess, I'd say "let's hammer a PR, using MiX's hard push on him to not instantly get flak and shutdown conversation".

Very interesting question, I would be thinking about this more if he wasn't dead already. I don't think it relates to other scumbuddies though, the only person alive that it relates to seems to be me.
I think it relates strongly to the question of whether mafia chose to recruit the Traitor.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #438 on: March 01, 2021, 06:56:37 am »

Vote: gkrieg, sheeping faust.

Didds, joth, ash, are you alive? I guess it's the middle of the night for americans, but still.
It seems that we're the only ones around, again. So let's use this time for a question: From your perspective, what was going through mcmc's head when he decided to hammer mathdude?

Hmm, that's a hard question. I don't think it was optimal scum thoughts since he got vigged. But if I had to guess, I'd say "let's hammer a PR, using MiX's hard push on him to not instantly get flak and shutdown conversation".

Very interesting question, I would be thinking about this more if he wasn't dead already. I don't think it relates to other scumbuddies though, the only person alive that it relates to seems to be me.
I think it relates strongly to the question of whether mafia chose to recruit the Traitor.

I can...see that mcmc might've thought I was a traitor. But I don't think mcmc was considering that math could be a traitor.

That question seems irrelevant right now. It's easier to know after the traitor flips :P
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #439 on: March 01, 2021, 08:17:30 am »

I'm alive, but swamped with various work and class commitments.

I am popping in to read so I don't fall behind, but not taking the time to post.

As for quick reads, MiX and faust seem mafia-ish.  Space seems towny.  No one else stands out as even playing this game.  gkrieg is lurking still, which is worse on D2, especially with flips and stuff to discuss.  (I know I am too, but I'm explaining that now.  Would ask for some understanding.)
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #440 on: March 01, 2021, 08:41:44 am »

Vote: gkrieg, sheeping faust.

Didds, joth, ash, are you alive? I guess it's the middle of the night for americans, but still.
It seems that we're the only ones around, again. So let's use this time for a question: From your perspective, what was going through mcmc's head when he decided to hammer mathdude?

Hmm, that's a hard question. I don't think it was optimal scum thoughts since he got vigged. But if I had to guess, I'd say "let's hammer a PR, using MiX's hard push on him to not instantly get flak and shutdown conversation".

Very interesting question, I would be thinking about this more if he wasn't dead already. I don't think it relates to other scumbuddies though, the only person alive that it relates to seems to be me.
I think it relates strongly to the question of whether mafia chose to recruit the Traitor.
That makes sense.  He would have been more reluctant if he didn't know who the traitor was.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #441 on: March 01, 2021, 09:06:07 am »

Hi friends! I was away for the weekend, so I am just now catching up.

Good job on mcmc, y’all!




Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #442 on: March 01, 2021, 11:48:24 am »

Following someone who turns out to be scum seems NAI to me. If we were partners, I'd want to distance rather than act in concert that way, except for WIFOM.

*snip*

Why pursue this line of investigation? It doesn't seem likely to be informative for the reasons I just gave. Unless you want to give towncred for following mcmc, but I don't think that's what you are suggesting.

No, I think MiX is/was trying to suggest that scum-points are warranted for following a scum, assuming there's a traitor in the game, so that's the line I was looking at.

I'm honestly not sure whether MiX's d1 case was just obvious for people other than me, or whether he's just so much work to follow that nobody else really bothers. If you had to phrase his d1 mathdude-joth argument your own words, could you do so without re-reading now to try to piece it back together?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #443 on: March 01, 2021, 01:11:50 pm »

I'm honestly not sure whether MiX's d1 case was just obvious for people other than me, or whether he's just so much work to follow that nobody else really bothers.
Definitely the latter.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #444 on: March 01, 2021, 01:32:51 pm »

I'm honestly not sure whether MiX's d1 case was just obvious for people other than me, or whether he's just so much work to follow that nobody else really bothers.
Definitely the latter.

Aww man, I was hoping someone else would've said that, cause I already knew your opinion.

I was tempted to say this too by the way.

faust, do you care to say why gkrieg is scum?
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #445 on: March 01, 2021, 01:40:18 pm »

Sorry that took a minute.

Yesterday I found EFHW scummy for laying low, then being flip with MiX, but I find her response to Space and her description of the scum ones of mathdude really off.  The EFHW wagon had no traction yesterday, and I’m not sure that will be any different today, but I’m somewhat buoyed by one of the other people who found her scummy was Robz (the other was MiX) so

Vote: EFHW

I’m not seeing why gkrieg is scummy... this week kind of snuck up on a bunch of us so im cutting all kinds of slack on activity level for now.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #446 on: March 01, 2021, 01:42:31 pm »

I'm honestly not sure whether MiX's d1 case was just obvious for people other than me, or whether he's just so much work to follow that nobody else really bothers.
Definitely the latter.
I don't tend to agree with his cases, but he makes a lot of incorrect guesses before zeroing in on the right answer. So I leave a lot of room for him to do that.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #447 on: March 01, 2021, 01:44:30 pm »

faust, do you care to say why gkrieg is scum?
Not at this point in the game. At the very least I want him to answer my question about his MiX vote first.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #448 on: March 01, 2021, 01:47:45 pm »

Vote: EFHW

This is fun! Sheeping Didds is new and exciting, I'm all for it!
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #449 on: March 01, 2021, 02:31:35 pm »

Sorry that took a minute.

Yesterday I found EFHW scummy for laying low, then being flip with MiX, but I find her response to Space and her description of the scum ones of mathdude really off.  The EFHW wagon had no traction yesterday, and I’m not sure that will be any different today, but I’m somewhat buoyed by one of the other people who found her scummy was Robz (the other was MiX) so

Vote: EFHW

I’m not seeing why gkrieg is scummy... this week kind of snuck up on a bunch of us so im cutting all kinds of slack on activity level for now.

Can you be more specific about how I seem off?
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #450 on: March 01, 2021, 02:37:31 pm »

Vote Count 2.2:

MiX (3): SpaceAnenome, Dylan32, gkrieg
EFHW (2): WestCoastDidds, MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
Not Voting (3): EFHW, Joth, Ashersky


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #451 on: March 01, 2021, 03:28:46 pm »

Just reread the game.

Chum to scum:

Space
joth
EFHW
ash
faust
Didds
Dylan
gkrieg

joth is town, ash is townie but fits in a lot of scumteams, Space is obv!town, faust is scum with ash or now, Didds is not doing much but then again she's tunneling EFHW less than I usually am, EFHW is town, Dylan's townie with a lot of bad reads and very scummy pushes that make him more scum than town, gkrieg hasn't done anything that town does yet.

Vote: gkrieg
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #452 on: March 01, 2021, 03:30:49 pm »

Just reread the game.

Chum to scum:

Space
joth
EFHW
ash
faust
Didds
Dylan
gkrieg

joth is town, ash is townie but fits in a lot of scumteams, Space is obv!town, faust is scum with ash or town, Didds is not doing much but then again she's tunneling EFHW less than I usually am, EFHW is town, Dylan's townie with a lot of bad reads and very scummy pushes that make him more scum than town, gkrieg hasn't done anything that town does yet.

Vote: gkrieg

EBWOP: I swear I haven't gone insane yet, it's just easy to write "now" instead of "town", right?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #453 on: March 01, 2021, 03:32:19 pm »

faust is scum with ash
God I wish!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #454 on: March 01, 2021, 03:34:09 pm »

faust is scum with ash
God I wish!

Yeah I have a feeling that you've been posting like you really want ash to be scum with you. Maybe that's just NAI, that'd be funny, but it does work if you're scum and he's traitor. Paradoxically, I can also see the other way around.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #455 on: March 01, 2021, 03:35:38 pm »

faust is scum with ash
God I wish!

Yeah I have a feeling that you've been posting like you really want ash to be scum with you. Maybe that's just NAI, that'd be funny, but it does work if you're scum and he's traitor. Paradoxically, I can also see the other way around.
I feel like I haven't posted about it this game. Well it wouldn't be the same if one of us is just a Traitor anyways.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #456 on: March 01, 2021, 03:38:30 pm »

*still waiting for gkrieg and Dylan to show up. Twiddlidum.*
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #457 on: March 01, 2021, 05:42:28 pm »

I'm honestly not sure whether MiX's d1 case was just obvious for people other than me, or whether he's just so much work to follow that nobody else really bothers.
Definitely the latter.
I don't tend to agree with his cases, but he makes a lot of incorrect guesses before zeroing in on the right answer. So I leave a lot of room for him to do that.

@EFHW, you skipped over the direct question I asked you in the post faust was quoting from.. care to go back and answer? :-)

If you had to phrase his d1 mathdude-joth argument your own words, could you do so without re-reading now to try to piece it back together?

(Where "his" in this context refers to MiX, in case some context got lost there).
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #458 on: March 01, 2021, 05:53:02 pm »

Ok, I'm going to be honest I haven't done a re-read yet, but I've been thinking about MiX.

The wagon seems, at first blush, too easy to be on scum.

But: One scum is dead and one of the remaining scum is possibly a traitor. If MiX is traitor, his partner wouldn't even know who he is, right? So MiX could be scum and have no defenders, or he has at most 1 defender. And at least one person (EFHW) has spoken up against the MiX wagon.

So maybe it's exactly easy enough.

All that said, it still seems to early in the day to put MiX at E-1 and enable a quickhammer. But I do kinda want to vote for MiX.

Didds, sell me on the EFHW wagon. I continue to not particularly see it.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #459 on: March 01, 2021, 06:10:22 pm »

I'm honestly not sure whether MiX's d1 case was just obvious for people other than me, or whether he's just so much work to follow that nobody else really bothers.
Definitely the latter.
I don't tend to agree with his cases, but he makes a lot of incorrect guesses before zeroing in on the right answer. So I leave a lot of room for him to do that.

@EFHW, you skipped over the direct question I asked you in the post faust was quoting from.. care to go back and answer? :-)

If you had to phrase his d1 mathdude-joth argument your own words, could you do so without re-reading now to try to piece it back together?

(Where "his" in this context refers to MiX, in case some context got lost there).
No. I don't parse everything he says, because he tends to leave a lot of steps out. I'll try, but if it's too obscure I might just move on. I just know his method works for him, when he's not tunneling me, anyway, so I don't read it as scummy.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #460 on: March 01, 2021, 06:48:08 pm »

Sorry that took a minute.

Yesterday I found EFHW scummy for laying low, then being flip with MiX, but I find her response to Space and her description of the scum ones of mathdude really off.  The EFHW wagon had no traction yesterday, and I’m not sure that will be any different today, but I’m somewhat buoyed by one of the other people who found her scummy was Robz (the other was MiX) so

Vote: EFHW

I’m not seeing why gkrieg is scummy... this week kind of snuck up on a bunch of us so im cutting all kinds of slack on activity level for now.

Can you be more specific about how I seem off?

Lots of defense, not much offense, the odd exchange with MiX.

Joth, (happy birthday!!) I’m not sure I’ve enough of a sense to sell you or anyone on EFHW, but she seems to be way less invested in scum hunting than townEFHW.  But I’m not ready to scream it from the mountaintops. Just more than I can say about anyone else at this point.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #461 on: March 01, 2021, 06:57:59 pm »

Ok, I'm going to be honest I haven't done a re-read yet, but I've been thinking about MiX.

The wagon seems, at first blush, too easy to be on scum.

But: One scum is dead and one of the remaining scum is possibly a traitor. If MiX is traitor, his partner wouldn't even know who he is, right? So MiX could be scum and have no defenders, or he has at most 1 defender. And at least one person (EFHW) has spoken up against the MiX wagon.

So maybe it's exactly easy enough.

All that said, it still seems to early in the day to put MiX at E-1 and enable a quickhammer. But I do kinda want to vote for MiX.

Didds, sell me on the EFHW wagon. I continue to not particularly see it.

Can you answer me this question:

If you had to name someone as scum, who would it be? And just this once, I'm fine if you think I'm that someone.

Will you do a reread today?

Do you think I'm scummy?

I'm town by the way, I can't believe anyone can see me as scum after what I did D1. Like, just reread D1 and I'm obviously town. It's kinda silly. Yes it's weird that I'm the one saying this, but it's true. It's just right there if you can read EoD1.

Did your reads, like, not change whatsoever during the night? That EFHW answer is the exact same one you gave in D1 to me.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #462 on: March 01, 2021, 07:00:35 pm »

No. I don't parse everything he says, because he tends to leave a lot of steps out. I'll try, but if it's too obscure I might just move on. I just know his method works for him, when he's not tunneling me, anyway, so I don't read it as scummy.

Okay.

Hey EFHW, who do you scumread currently? Who do you townread currently? Who would you vote for if you had to? What are you currently rereading? What are you doing in this Day? Cause if you have nothing to do I suggest you reread me and actually try to understand what I'm saying, it's not just rambling even if it looks like it.

I'm trying to play the game and if you just won't read my posts then why the hell do I even bother.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #463 on: March 01, 2021, 07:05:10 pm »

@MiX if you're not scum I don't know who the heck is. I am still planning to do a re-read, but I decided I didn't feel like doing one on my birthday. I'll do it tomorrow during boring meetings.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #464 on: March 01, 2021, 07:08:24 pm »

@MiX if you're not scum I don't know who the heck is. I am still planning to do a re-read, but I decided I didn't feel like doing one on my birthday. I'll do it tomorrow during boring meetings.

Yeah that's what I thought, why would anyone reread on their birthday, ew.

Happy birthday by the way!
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #465 on: March 01, 2021, 07:34:53 pm »

Mix, was any part of that for me, or was that all a question for Joth?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #466 on: March 01, 2021, 07:36:27 pm »

Mix, was any part of that for me, or was that all a question for Joth?

That was all for joth.

What do you think of gkrieg and Dylan? Have you reread D1?
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #467 on: March 01, 2021, 07:51:51 pm »

Sweet!

I have not reread D1.

I think gkrieg is towny and is I appreciate the stream of consciousness the way he recasts to the day when he has time to read. I don’t know what scummy gkrieg is like, though, so I could’ve fooled.

Dylan is playing? I don’t have much of an impression, although I do remember giving him some side eye when y’all were castigating/dismissing Joth’s response to a question as an appeal to emotion. So, I don’t have much of an opinion, and to the extent I do, it’s slightly scummy.

faust is the biggest unknown to me, right now.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #468 on: March 01, 2021, 08:33:44 pm »

No. I don't parse everything he says, because he tends to leave a lot of steps out. I'll try, but if it's too obscure I might just move on. I just know his method works for him, when he's not tunneling me, anyway, so I don't read it as scummy.

Okay.

Hey EFHW, who do you scumread currently? Who do you townread currently? Who would you vote for if you had to? What are you currently rereading? What are you doing in this Day? Cause if you have nothing to do I suggest you reread me and actually try to understand what I'm saying, it's not just rambling even if it looks like it.

I'm trying to play the game and if you just won't read my posts then why the hell do I even bother.

MiX, the reason I'm asking that of EFHW is that she's defending you and even she gives up on reading you because too much of what you say just doesn't seem to make sense.

I'm really miffed that you accused me of being "low effort" when I was asking you to clarify what you'd meant, because I think I'm one of very few people who even tried. The fact I honestly made an attempt to parse what you were saying, spent/wasted time on it (depending on whether you're scum or town here) and still came up blank should tell you that other players are not able to make sense of posts like that mathdude-joth "case".

What I think from trying to put it together following all your references is that you were accusing mathdude of being the traitor because he sheeped joth at one point early in the game, which happened at some point before the mathdude post you'd actually quoted, and you thought that the obvious conclusion from that was that mathdude was a traitor purposefully sheeping mafia!joth. You never said anything of the sort, and I'd be curious whether anyone else in-game realised that that's what you were saying (if indeed it even was?!) when you raised it at the end of do. Do you see how much clearer it could have been had you actually said what you meant?

Of course, I think there's a strong chance that either you're scum sewing this level of confusion and time-wasting on purpose, or your fixation on the traitor was your way of signalling to mcmc and his buddy that you're it. If you're scum being allowed to hide behind this scummy level of meta, though, I still think we should be calling it out as bad play so you can't hide the same way next time.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #469 on: March 01, 2021, 09:16:35 pm »

No. I don't parse everything he says, because he tends to leave a lot of steps out. I'll try, but if it's too obscure I might just move on. I just know his method works for him, when he's not tunneling me, anyway, so I don't read it as scummy.

Okay.

Hey EFHW, who do you scumread currently? Who do you townread currently? Who would you vote for if you had to? What are you currently rereading? What are you doing in this Day? Cause if you have nothing to do I suggest you reread me and actually try to understand what I'm saying, it's not just rambling even if it looks like it.

I'm trying to play the game and if you just won't read my posts then why the hell do I even bother.

I do read what you say. But you jump around a lot, and the logic behind your conclusions is often obscure, and chances are good you'll change your mind pretty soon, so I wait and see if it comes up again. I've read you closely enough to be townreading you. Unlike many people, I have never scumread you for your style.

I'm OMGUS scumreading Didds. Space is unusually cranky. That's probably more of a towntell than anything. Dylan, gkrieg, ash and joth could easily go either way. Townreading faust.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #470 on: March 01, 2021, 11:33:45 pm »

Regarding the MiX wagon that opened today -- joth did some talking about it, but I think he may be incorrect?

The thing to me is it shot up quickly and then stalled, which feels more indicative of a wagon on mafia than a wagon on town.  If remaining mafia are already on a MiX misexile wagon, then okay, but quite often I think wagons on mafia stall more than town.

So the fact that it hit E-2 and has just hovered there seems suspect.  Sure, it could be that everyone realizes with ash in this game, an E-1 vote is basically the hammer, but I don't think everyone is thinking about that.

If MiX is mafia, his partner has started one of the other wagons, I think.  Mafia team is just in too bad a way to go for the hard bus on D2 (there are obviously players who would buck that assumption, but I am not mafia this game).
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #471 on: March 02, 2021, 12:19:01 am »

I’ll get to this tomorrow.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #472 on: March 02, 2021, 12:44:34 am »

Regarding the MiX wagon that opened today -- joth did some talking about it, but I think he may be incorrect?

The thing to me is it shot up quickly and then stalled, which feels more indicative of a wagon on mafia than a wagon on town.  If remaining mafia are already on a MiX misexile wagon, then okay, but quite often I think wagons on mafia stall more than town.

So the fact that it hit E-2 and has just hovered there seems suspect.  Sure, it could be that everyone realizes with ash in this game, an E-1 vote is basically the hammer, but I don't think everyone is thinking about that.

If MiX is mafia, his partner has started one of the other wagons, I think.  Mafia team is just in too bad a way to go for the hard bus on D2 (there are obviously players who would buck that assumption, but I am not mafia this game).
This is some terrible reasoning. The whole game has stalled, not just the MiX wagon. And you made it your mission yesterday to remind everyone that you will hammer at any time.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #473 on: March 02, 2021, 12:53:05 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #474 on: March 02, 2021, 12:54:10 am »

Prior to my reminding anyone, no one had voted.  Since my reminder, players may be being careful; before that?  I doubt it.

Mafia wagons often stall is not terrible reasoning; it's a fairly normal argument that gets brought up often.  Mafia use it to their advantage often, especially in the early game, where it can be useful to have wagons that don't go anywhere on themselves.

MiX wagon stalling seems more likely to be because he is mafia than because he is town, regardless of any other external influences on voting.

Saying it stalled because too many players are AFK does not answer the question.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #475 on: March 02, 2021, 12:56:29 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #476 on: March 02, 2021, 12:57:18 am »

MiX wagon stalling seems more likely to be because he is mafia than because he is town
Except you have no evidence for this.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #477 on: March 02, 2021, 12:59:54 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
No, it's not. You could try to actually understand instead of being dismissive about it. Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #478 on: March 02, 2021, 03:30:34 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
No, it's not. You could try to actually understand instead of being dismissive about it. Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.

Or they said "hey, let's both do this thing together, no one will think mafia partners would do such a coordinated push, that way if one of us is exiled the other will have a strong defense."

Then it's actually good play, right?  Well played MiX and McMc.  Well played.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #479 on: March 02, 2021, 03:31:07 am »

What I think from trying to put it together following all your references is that you were accusing mathdude of being the traitor because he sheeped joth at one point early in the game, which happened at some point before the mathdude post you'd actually quoted, and you thought that the obvious conclusion from that was that mathdude was a traitor purposefully sheeping mafia!joth. You never said anything of the sort, and I'd be curious whether anyone else in-game realised that that's what you were saying (if indeed it even was?!) when you raised it at the end of do. Do you see how much clearer it could have been had you actually said what you meant?

I mean, I did mention all of this:

Woah, that's crazy.

Vote: joth

This post comes immediately after math's, and:

Woah, that's crazy.

Vote: joth

Why the Joth vote?

True, but given he FoS’d you your vote has an implied OMGUS.

Vote: Dylan32

Joth started this, and I think he's a better vote than mathdude.

Then I say I'm scumreading both joth and math. And at EoD1 I say that I thought they were scum/traitor.

It's not like it was a good case, but hey, you got to what I meant perfectly. And no, no one was going to look up what I had meant EoD1, but then again people were focusing on the present, as they should given the math wagon.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #480 on: March 02, 2021, 03:43:29 am »

Regarding the MiX wagon that opened today -- joth did some talking about it, but I think he may be incorrect?

The thing to me is it shot up quickly and then stalled, which feels more indicative of a wagon on mafia than a wagon on town.  If remaining mafia are already on a MiX misexile wagon, then okay, but quite often I think wagons on mafia stall more than town.

So the fact that it hit E-2 and has just hovered there seems suspect.  Sure, it could be that everyone realizes with ash in this game, an E-1 vote is basically the hammer, but I don't think everyone is thinking about that.

If MiX is mafia, his partner has started one of the other wagons, I think.  Mafia team is just in too bad a way to go for the hard bus on D2 (there are obviously players who would buck that assumption, but I am not mafia this game).

You do know that scum can think I'm scum, making it looks like a "scum wagon"? Not that I'm saying this is happening: in fact, I know for a fact that scum knows I'm town.

Prior to my reminding anyone, no one had voted.  Since my reminder, players may be being careful; before that?  I doubt it.

Mafia wagons often stall is not terrible reasoning; it's a fairly normal argument that gets brought up often.  Mafia use it to their advantage often, especially in the early game, where it can be useful to have wagons that don't go anywhere on themselves.

MiX wagon stalling seems more likely to be because he is mafia than because he is town, regardless of any other external influences on voting.

Saying it stalled because too many players are AFK does not answer the question.

If the wagon keeps being "intentionally" stalled, I'm going to die at EoD2. How is this something I would want? What scum play is "accept that you have a random wagon on you and do nothing about it"?

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
No, it's not. You could try to actually understand instead of being dismissive about it. Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.

Or they said "hey, let's both do this thing together, no one will think mafia partners would do such a coordinated push, that way if one of us is exiled the other will have a strong defense."

Then it's actually good play, right?  Well played MiX and McMc.  Well played.

Ah yes, the strong defense of "let's counterclaim math and also quickhammer and also sacrifice a buddy". Look at how much I fight in mcmc's behalf with Space: now why would I do that if he's scum? Yes, yes, WIFOM, but like, come one, we both know that what I did would just make Space scumread them more.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #481 on: March 02, 2021, 03:48:59 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
No, it's not. You could try to actually understand instead of being dismissive about it. Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.

Or they said "hey, let's both do this thing together, no one will think mafia partners would do such a coordinated push, that way if one of us is exiled the other will have a strong defense."

Then it's actually good play, right?  Well played MiX and McMc.  Well played.
Are you slipping that you know mafia has daychat?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #482 on: March 02, 2021, 03:50:36 am »

I know it's easier to believe that you're the genius who saw through scum ingenious plan than that you're wrong, but come on.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #483 on: March 02, 2021, 03:51:11 am »

I know it's easier to believe that you're the genius who saw through scum's ingenious plan than that you're wrong, but come on.
EBWOP
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #484 on: March 02, 2021, 03:54:06 am »

I know it's easier to believe that you're the genius who saw through scum ingenious plan than that you're wrong, but come on.

ash loves scumreading me when he's scum (and when he's awake), do you think this tunneling's scummy?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #485 on: March 02, 2021, 04:05:40 am »

I know it's easier to believe that you're the genius who saw through scum ingenious plan than that you're wrong, but come on.

ash loves scumreading me when he's scum (and when he's awake), do you think this tunneling's scummy?
Not really, it's ash. I was starting to scumread him for not stubbornly holding onto his beliefs until this happened.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #486 on: March 02, 2021, 06:30:52 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
No, it's not. You could try to actually understand instead of being dismissive about it. Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.

Or they said "hey, let's both do this thing together, no one will think mafia partners would do such a coordinated push, that way if one of us is exiled the other will have a strong defense."

Then it's actually good play, right?  Well played MiX and McMc.  Well played.
Are you slipping that you know mafia has daychat?

Yes.  I also earlier slipped that I'm the Role Cop.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #487 on: March 02, 2021, 06:34:39 am »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

Is your argument that bad play comes from town and not mafia?  Because that is how it reads.  Mafia players have bad games sometimes.
No, it's not. You could try to actually understand instead of being dismissive about it. Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.

Or they said "hey, let's both do this thing together, no one will think mafia partners would do such a coordinated push, that way if one of us is exiled the other will have a strong defense."

Then it's actually good play, right?  Well played MiX and McMc.  Well played.
Are you slipping that you know mafia has daychat?

Yes.  I also earlier slipped that I'm the Role Cop.
Uhhh, spicy! Where was that?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #488 on: March 02, 2021, 08:06:45 am »

Prior to my reminding anyone, no one had voted.  Since my reminder, players may be being careful; before that?  I doubt it.

Mafia wagons often stall is not terrible reasoning; it's a fairly normal argument that gets brought up often.  Mafia use it to their advantage often, especially in the early game, where it can be useful to have wagons that don't go anywhere on themselves.

MiX wagon stalling seems more likely to be because he is mafia than because he is town, regardless of any other external influences on voting.

Saying it stalled because too many players are AFK does not answer the question.

I personally would have voted MiX by now if not for him being at E-2 and it being the weekend and wanting to give everyone a chance to post before a quick day end.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #489 on: March 02, 2021, 08:19:47 am »

Prior to my reminding anyone, no one had voted.  Since my reminder, players may be being careful; before that?  I doubt it.

Mafia wagons often stall is not terrible reasoning; it's a fairly normal argument that gets brought up often.  Mafia use it to their advantage often, especially in the early game, where it can be useful to have wagons that don't go anywhere on themselves.

MiX wagon stalling seems more likely to be because he is mafia than because he is town, regardless of any other external influences on voting.

Saying it stalled because too many players are AFK does not answer the question.

I personally would have voted MiX by now if not for him being at E-2 and it being the weekend and wanting to give everyone a chance to post before a quick day end.

Okay, okay, I'll act like I'm at E-1.

I'm the vig. Go read EoD1, I practically counterclaimed math's vig claim. That and everything I've been doing this whole game should verify that. Why do you think I was trying to get scumreads so openly? Why do you think I said it was a terrible EoD when both me and math were the wagons? Why do you think I played self-preservation so much? Why do you think I valued my life over math's? I thought this was obvious to everyone, including scum and Robz, but I guess not.

Anyway, Space is town because I used their reads (and Robz's, turns out when you can't explain a scumread it's even better) to kill mcmc. This I am sure of.

Now can we please not waste the second half of D2 voting a PR? Sadly I don't have great scumreads anymore, just solid townreads, but still, I'm sure there's 6 other town members that can find scum.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #490 on: March 02, 2021, 08:28:10 am »

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon. Frankly, I don't think we can rule out bad play from the scum team because the quickhammer was bad play and it happened.

Also, MiX was so close to being exiled. The only way it makes any sense for mcmc to hammer there the way he did was if he thought the alternative was losing a teammate.

And the vig claim, unfortunately, doesn't give MiX any town points in my book, if anything it's the opposite, though I suppose we should consider keeping him alive strategically if there's no counterclaim.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #491 on: March 02, 2021, 08:33:53 am »

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon. Frankly, I don't think we can rule out bad play from the scum team because the quickhammer was bad play and it happened.

Also, MiX was so close to being exiled. The only way it makes any sense for mcmc to hammer there the way he did was if he thought the alternative was losing a teammate.

And the vig claim, unfortunately, doesn't give MiX any town points in my book, if anything it's the opposite, though I suppose we should consider keeping him alive strategically if there's no counterclaim.

What the fuuuuuuuuuuck, of course I'm the vig, reread my entire day, reread D2 how many times was I close to claiming PR? At this point if I flip town you're gonna tell me I'm a death Godfather, that's how deep in the tunnel you are.

I killed mcmc, I'm the Vig, I counterclaimed math because I thought he was claiming either Roleblocker or Vig, and I decided to take my chances, that's why I said intent to make someone else hammer, that's why I bolded it, the only reason I would ever kill math like that (I even said I killed math, which is sorta true cause it was better him than me, especially in hindsight since I did shoot scum), everything I've done this game points to me being a PR and me being Vig.

What, you think I'm trying to get a counterclaim?? That's horrible, you know damn well scum!MiX doesn't go down like this. Honestly, go ahead, counterclaim me scum, lmao you'll just die now because I'm not getting exiled...because I'm the damn vig and that should be obvious. Who else interacted with people reading mcmc as much as me? Who else could've shot?

I cannot believe even after my claim people think I'm scum, I just can't, I thought I outed myself EoD1, and I presume that's what scum saw, and what Robz saw. You think the Bodyguard just died randomly? Come on!

Just go and reread D1 joth.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #492 on: March 02, 2021, 08:48:02 am »

I'll just reread for you, that's how much I think you're town right now joth. Here's all the posts that say I'm a PR, some of them specifically a vig (some things are bolded):

I kinda really hate how there's barely any alternatives to math...oh and that I'm one of them.

Good job everyone. What a horrible EoD.

Okay, yes, I don't have a lot of scumreads.

Intent to make someone hammer math

MiX would never allow himself to do a play that locks him town!

You should have fullclaimed. Or not claimed to be a PR at all.

Well yeah I am cold. I just killed math. I could've died instead of taking the roleblocker, but I went all in on a read I got at the start of the game.

I hate this D1 so much. Good job scum.

And for D2:

Woah, both brother are dead. But hey, the vig got mcmc, hell yeah!

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

So, where do we start today?

Words cannot describe what I'm feeling right now.

I'll brush it off as "I'm the counterwagon". Look at EoD1: I was playing self-pres all the way.

But me quoting that EoD1 was self-pres, I still thought math was town, I just quoted the scummiest post of his (in my mind) to convince myself that he could be scum, so I would have the drive to keep pushing on him. Before his flip, I didn't really have a strong enough scumread to want to push at EoD1, and even if I did, chances were I was getting exiled if math was saved, so I thought that essencially throwing math under the bus was right.

I'm town by the way, I can't believe anyone can see me as scum after what I did D1. Like, just reread D1 and I'm obviously town. It's kinda silly. Yes it's weird that I'm the one saying this, but it's true. It's just right there if you can read EoD1.

Like, okay, you can tell me I decided to claim vig sometime during D2, but it wasn't at the start, lol, so some of these D2 posts are relevant.


Do you want me to explain why I think these posts are evidence that I was at least thinking like a vig when I made them? Because I can explain all of them, I just think it's best if I don't do that immediately.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #493 on: March 02, 2021, 08:59:09 am »

And the vig claim, unfortunately, doesn't give MiX any town points in my book, if anything it's the opposite, though I suppose we should consider keeping him alive strategically if there's no counterclaim.
Lol are you insane?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #494 on: March 02, 2021, 09:00:22 am »

Vote: SpaceAnemone now that there is no longer a reason not to.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #495 on: March 02, 2021, 09:03:09 am »

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon. Frankly, I don't think we can rule out bad play from the scum team because the quickhammer was bad play and it happened.
A quickhammer isn't bad play. It would have been decent if mcmc thought that mathdude might flip Traitor.

Also, MiX was so close to being exiled. The only way it makes any sense for mcmc to hammer there the way he did was if he thought the alternative was losing a teammate.
Obviously not.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #496 on: March 02, 2021, 09:04:24 am »

Vote: SpaceAnemone now that there is no longer a reason not to.

Do you think my read's that bad?

And the vig claim, unfortunately, doesn't give MiX any town points in my book, if anything it's the opposite, though I suppose we should consider keeping him alive strategically if there's no counterclaim.
Lol are you insane?

Probably!

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon. Frankly, I don't think we can rule out bad play from the scum team because the quickhammer was bad play and it happened.
A quickhammer isn't bad play. It would have been decent if mcmc thought that mathdude might flip Traitor.

Wait, wouldn't it be way worse if math was traitor?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #497 on: March 02, 2021, 09:04:35 am »

Vig claim is 100% the go-to claim for scum in this game, especially now that they know there is one.

I swear, I will never understand this community's blind faith in obviously self-serving claims.

None of those quotes communicates a vig claim to me, and even if they did, scum would absolutely be setting up for a possible vig claim so it proves nothing.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #498 on: March 02, 2021, 09:05:46 am »

I will grant that MiX has made the claim in a towny way, and that his current exasperation reads genuine.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #499 on: March 02, 2021, 09:06:02 am »

Vig claim is 100% the go-to claim for scum in this game, especially now that they know there is one.

I swear, I will never understand this community's blind faith in obviously self-serving claims.

None of those quotes communicates a vig claim to me, and even if they did, scum would absolutely be setting up for a possible vig claim so it proves nothing.
Look, if there is another vig then it's ideal for them to counterclaim now. If there isn't then MiX is IC.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #500 on: March 02, 2021, 09:09:51 am »

Vote: SpaceAnemone now that there is no longer a reason not to.

Do you think my read's that bad?
Well... I didn't see much in your read other than "Space voted for mcmc". Space is capable of bussing and mcmc was never in any danger of being exiled, so that doesn't exactly appeal to me. And I do think that I know Space better than you. They have been very illogical in their pursuit of your wagon; Space likes to point out that when I'm not making sense, I'm scum; the same holds true for them.

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon. Frankly, I don't think we can rule out bad play from the scum team because the quickhammer was bad play and it happened.
A quickhammer isn't bad play. It would have been decent if mcmc thought that mathdude might flip Traitor.

Wait, wouldn't it be way worse if math was traitor?
Well, the way I see it, mcmc was trying to grab some towncred with that quote that he pulled.
(now that I think of it... it is interesting that he grabbed that quote. Makes me think scum were Traitor-hunting all along, so they probably didn't recruit.)
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #501 on: March 02, 2021, 09:15:32 am »

Question for the MiX voters: What exactly do you think was going on at the end of D1, with MiX urging the hammer and mcmc executing it?

It wasn't nearly deadline yet, and MiX was creating an artificial sense of urgency, which mcmc was capitalising on. MiX was taking a clearly terrible course of action in pushing for an immediate exile without thinking through any of the consequences of the claim or how to tease information out of it properly. He was totally failing to engage with posts from people like me or Robz, saying that we should hold off on mathdude, or sort the partial claim out more sensibly. He was reacting to almost everything except those voice-of-reason posts, and claiming he was "on fire" while doing so. If we want not to exile MiX, please convince me that letting him remain in the game to continue that kind of play is actually beneficial to my town wincon.
Just look at that reasoning. There is nothing in here on wagon composition, not even a mention of the fact that this argument would make it so that there are 2 scum on the wagon, no analysis of whether MiX is Traitor or teammate, no nothing.

I think Space decided N1 that MiX would be a good push and then didn't incorporate mcmc's flip into that already premade case.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #502 on: March 02, 2021, 09:37:58 am »

Vig claim is 100% the go-to claim for scum in this game, especially now that they know there is one.

I swear, I will never understand this community's blind faith in obviously self-serving claims.

None of those quotes communicates a vig claim to me, and even if they did, scum would absolutely be setting up for a possible vig claim so it proves nothing.
Look, if there is another vig then it's ideal for them to counterclaim now. If there isn't then MiX is IC.

Is it really ideal for them to out themselves and play right into scum's hands? I think that's at the very least up for debate.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #503 on: March 02, 2021, 09:39:49 am »

Vig claim is 100% the go-to claim for scum in this game, especially now that they know there is one.

I swear, I will never understand this community's blind faith in obviously self-serving claims.

None of those quotes communicates a vig claim to me, and even if they did, scum would absolutely be setting up for a possible vig claim so it proves nothing.
Look, if there is another vig then it's ideal for them to counterclaim now. If there isn't then MiX is IC.

Is it really ideal for them to out themselves and play right into scum's hands? I think that's at the very least up for debate.
Well no you're right. they should not claim of course. They should just shoot MiX tonight.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #504 on: March 02, 2021, 09:40:03 am »

I know that faust holds an extremely low opinion of the utiility of vigs and thinks that they should never shoot and probably should self-vote on day 1 just in case, but the vig we have in this game seems pretty good and maybe worth keeping alive.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #505 on: March 02, 2021, 09:40:54 am »

I know that faust holds an extremely low opinion of the utiility of vigs and thinks that they should never shoot and probably should self-vote on day 1 just in case, but the vig we have in this game seems pretty good and maybe worth keeping alive.
i have no idea where this is coming from but it is completely inaccurate.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #506 on: March 02, 2021, 09:41:20 am »

We're arguing semantics a bit because I think we both agree that MiX's claim makes him a bad exile for today. So we should move onto figuring out who the alternative is.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #507 on: March 02, 2021, 09:42:03 am »

We're arguing semantics a bit because I think we both agree that MiX's claim makes him a bad exile for today. So we should move onto figuring out who the alternative is.
I'm way ahead of you.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #508 on: March 02, 2021, 09:42:09 am »

I know that faust holds an extremely low opinion of the utiility of vigs and thinks that they should never shoot and probably should self-vote on day 1 just in case, but the vig we have in this game seems pretty good and maybe worth keeping alive.
i have no idea where this is coming from but it is completely inaccurate.
It's entirely possible I'm mixing you up with someone else. Is it ash? I know there's people on this forum who are really down on vigs.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #509 on: March 02, 2021, 09:51:06 am »

I know that faust holds an extremely low opinion of the utiility of vigs and thinks that they should never shoot and probably should self-vote on day 1 just in case, but the vig we have in this game seems pretty good and maybe worth keeping alive.
i have no idea where this is coming from but it is completely inaccurate.
It's entirely possible I'm mixing you up with someone else. Is it ash? I know there's people on this forum who are really down on vigs.
I remember that discussion but not who fell on which side. I tried to find the thread that this discussion happened in, no success. I did however stumble upon this gem.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #510 on: March 02, 2021, 10:01:55 am »

Holy spicy content Batman! Such exciting goings on!

faust, there you are, I’ve been missing you.

Ash is the role cop? Mix is the vig?

I’m not sure how this makes Space scum (although I 100% trust Faust’s read), and in the back and forth Joth is more towny than not.

MiX, what’s you take on EFHW? Dylan?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #511 on: March 02, 2021, 10:09:15 am »

Ironically, in one of the edits of one of my d2 MiX-is-too-scummy-not-to-exile posts, I'd been going to say that the play is too bad even to be believable as cover for a PR, and that we really should exile MiX even if he's the successful vig, because on principle that kind of play us just too unpleasant to be allowed. Luckily I think I edited myself back a bit, partly because I know I'm grumpy (sorry; am in physical pain but am getting better so will be more cheerful soon!) and partly because there wasn't any reason to speculate about the identity of the vig openly.

As for MiX, I think the claim makes a load of sense in context. Mathdude didn't come close to claiming vig, but MiX is very easily biased, so the moment he saw a potential PR he read too much into it and rushed into trying to get an exile through. I still maintain that my suggestion of letting Mathdude claim more fully before rushing into anything would have been the correct play, and that anyone urging anything else was acting against the interests of town.

Faust is right that MiX is IC if not counterclaimed. I assume there are a few people like gkrieg and Dylan who need a bit of time to react, but I'll start processing things with IC!MiX in mind in the meantime.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #512 on: March 02, 2021, 10:16:22 am »

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon.

This was a conclusion I'd come to independently before I say joth post this. Faust was making a big noise asking how MiX was scummy. MiX himself has now said he was being openly scummy to hide his PR, which makes some sense but was unfortunately calibrated, since I found his levels of bad arguments so over-the-top noisy and anti-town as to be kind of offensive. And yet faust kept going back to asking about how people could read MiX scummy, which was not at all moving the conversation onto other possible vote targets.

And sure, before anyone tries to equate faust's line of questioning to the things I was asking about e.g. how EFHW understood MiX's cases, I was trying to understand what other people who were defending MiX were thinking, and how they read his arguments, because honestly I thought anyone defending him was sporting some pretty big wilful blind spots, which isn't something town wants to go around doing on purpose.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #513 on: March 02, 2021, 10:26:07 am »

Well... I didn't see much in your read other than "Space voted for mcmc". Space is capable of bussing and mcmc was never in any danger of being exiled, so that doesn't exactly appeal to me. And I do think that I know Space better than you. They have been very illogical in their pursuit of your wagon; Space likes to point out that when I'm not making sense, I'm scum; the same holds true for them.

Yep, and I've already said that your support of MiX, and your pushing for the quick exile of mathdude aren't sensible, and so you're high up my scum list.


Question for the MiX voters: What exactly do you think was going on at the end of D1, with MiX urging the hammer and mcmc executing it?

It wasn't nearly deadline yet, and MiX was creating an artificial sense of urgency, which mcmc was capitalising on. MiX was taking a clearly terrible course of action in pushing for an immediate exile without thinking through any of the consequences of the claim or how to tease information out of it properly. He was totally failing to engage with posts from people like me or Robz, saying that we should hold off on mathdude, or sort the partial claim out more sensibly. He was reacting to almost everything except those voice-of-reason posts, and claiming he was "on fire" while doing so. If we want not to exile MiX, please convince me that letting him remain in the game to continue that kind of play is actually beneficial to my town wincon.
Just look at that reasoning. There is nothing in here on wagon composition, not even a mention of the fact that this argument would make it so that there are 2 scum on the wagon, no analysis of whether MiX is Traitor or teammate, no nothing.

I think Space decided N1 that MiX would be a good push and then didn't incorporate mcmc's flip into that already premade case.

There doesn't need to be an argument on wagon composition for MiX's eod1 to look terrible. MiX failing to engage with me or Robz urging moderation isn't dependent on whether there are 2 scum on the wagon or not, so why are you saying that it matters to my argument there?

As for analysing wagons, we lost a bodyguard, so we can't even tell whether scum tried to kill on-wagon or off-wagon, and the scummy hammer ended up coming from now-known scum. I did spend a while looking at the voting patterns, and I've already mentioned that I think joth is likely town because of it, given that mcmc doesn't really seem to have bussed d1 in other recent scumgames. Is that the kind of post you're trying to accuse me of not having made, or do you just need the one-scum-in-this-pool sort of predictions I sometimes make, so that then you can accuse me of being scummy for assuming or not assuming where the potential traitor fits in, since those are a lot harder to deduce well when we don't even know if all the scumteam are aware of each other?

Vote:  faust
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #514 on: March 02, 2021, 10:26:39 am »

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon.

This was a conclusion I'd come to independently before I say joth post this. Faust was making a big noise asking how MiX was scummy. MiX himself has now said he was being openly scummy to hide his PR, which makes some sense but was unfortunately calibrated, since I found his levels of bad arguments so over-the-top noisy and anti-town as to be kind of offensive. And yet faust kept going back to asking about how people could read MiX scummy, which was not at all moving the conversation onto other possible vote targets.
Oh, is this the OMGUS arriving?

I think I said multiple times that I was waiting for gkrieg and Dylan to answer my questions before moving on with my arguments. I mean, there was time; it's not like I could know that people would be so eager to get that quixile in.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #515 on: March 02, 2021, 10:31:52 am »

Well... I didn't see much in your read other than "Space voted for mcmc". Space is capable of bussing and mcmc was never in any danger of being exiled, so that doesn't exactly appeal to me. And I do think that I know Space better than you. They have been very illogical in their pursuit of your wagon; Space likes to point out that when I'm not making sense, I'm scum; the same holds true for them.

Yep, and I've already said that your support of MiX, and your pushing for the quick exile of mathdude aren't sensible, and so you're high up my scum list.
Yes, yes, clearly the sensible thing to do with regards to MiX was to stay on his wagon when it was already clear that people were ready and willing to exile him. Sorry for not seeing that sooner...

The thing with mathdude wasn't my finest moment, but his claim was pretty bad. You're just putting "not sensible" where it should just read "wrong". It's ironic that you are giving me flak for enabling a PR exile when you've just been doing the very same thing.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #516 on: March 02, 2021, 10:36:34 am »

It should be clear to anyone reading that I would not possibly be mcmc's partner here. You had a bit of an (albeit terrible) argument when it came to MiX, seeing as he was the alternative wagon - there the claim would be that it was an attempt to save MiX. But now we know it was town v town, so there is literally zero reason for any scumteam to put all their votes behind a bad misexile.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #517 on: March 02, 2021, 10:41:27 am »

Holy spicy content Batman! Such exciting goings on!

faust, there you are, I’ve been missing you.

Ash is the role cop? Mix is the vig?

I’m not sure how this makes Space scum (although I 100% trust Faust’s read), and in the back and forth Joth is more towny than not.

MiX, what’s you take on EFHW? Dylan?

I agree this is a pretty spicy game.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #518 on: March 02, 2021, 10:41:56 am »

MiX, assuming that you are the vig, excellent work. I can't remember the last time we had a successful night one vig shot.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #519 on: March 02, 2021, 11:02:44 am »

MiX, assuming that you are the vig, excellent work. I can't remember the last time we had a successful night one vig shot.

Thank you? I would also thank Robz and Space, the latter, even if scum, helped a lot.


(For Space) Considering that the quickexile was made by scum, and I vigged them, I'm at peace with my push on math EoD1. Town shouldn't - and didn't - hammer math back then, they should've- and would've - looked for other alternatives, hopefully ones that aren't me. The fact that mcmc got the hammer first isn't mine - or town's - fault.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #520 on: March 02, 2021, 12:23:19 pm »

Vig claim is 100% the go-to claim for scum in this game, especially now that they know there is one.

I swear, I will never understand this community's blind faith in obviously self-serving claims.

None of those quotes communicates a vig claim to me, and even if they did, scum would absolutely be setting up for a possible vig claim so it proves nothing.
Look, if there is another vig then it's ideal for them to counterclaim now. If there isn't then MiX is IC.

Is it really ideal for them to out themselves and play right into scum's hands? I think that's at the very least up for debate.
Well no you're right. they should not claim of course. They should just shoot MiX tonight.

Well, no: scum!me has bulletproof. Scum should counterclaim me today, not in 2 days and say that I was bulletproof.

I know that faust holds an extremely low opinion of the utiility of vigs and thinks that they should never shoot and probably should self-vote on day 1 just in case, but the vig we have in this game seems pretty good and maybe worth keeping alive.

Says the guy that wanted to essentially hammer the vig. Honestly, I'm no longer useful, since one of the scum has a 1-shot bulletproof, and the bodyguard's dead. I'm just an IC...a MIC if you will.

MiX, what’s you take on EFHW? Dylan?

joth is town, ash is townie but fits in a lot of scumteams, Space is obv!town, faust is scum with ash or now, Didds is not doing much but then again she's tunneling EFHW less than I usually am, EFHW is town, Dylan's townie with a lot of bad reads and very scummy pushes that make him more scum than town, gkrieg hasn't done anything that town does yet.

These are my reads. Yeah they're not very detailed, my reads are a mess, considering my 3 strongest reads are dead. Then again, I killed one of them, so...

I'm just not seeing EFHW being scum this game, if she is scum then she's trying to scumhunt and not trying to help mcmc accomplish anything, I also don't see an agenda for D2 either. I disagree with a lot of things Dylan's saying, but they always seem reasonable and this game is no different. I should probably reread his scum games, since I remember him not being this cool as scum, but his posts are so opportunistic and he seems to have a different goal than other people here.

As for MiX, I think the claim makes a load of sense in context. Mathdude didn't come close to claiming vig, but MiX is very easily biased, so the moment he saw a potential PR he read too much into it and rushed into trying to get an exile through. I still maintain that my suggestion of letting Mathdude claim more fully before rushing into anything would have been the correct play, and that anyone urging anything else was acting against the interests of town.

I'm just gonna cut the first paragraph, I can't talk about it enough without getting into too many NAI things.

Well, math clearly did a "Roleblocker or Vigilante" claim, even Dylan saw that. I saw it and took my chances. Of course I was biased, as the Vig I overblew the chances that he was claiming Vig. I rushed the exile, but my vote was already on him, I couldn't do anything myself, in fact scum did, not town. My reasoning for voting math to E-1 there was so we could continue the day: as joth had implied earlier, we weren't stopping before math claimed, and I wanted town to have as much time as possible to look at someone else as an alternative. Tell mcmc that he shouldn't had hammered; of course not, and if you say that I gave mcmc cover for him to hammer, tell that to his dead body. I didn't allow my play to help scum.

This is all useless now that I'm a MIC, but I still want to justify myself.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #521 on: March 02, 2021, 12:36:38 pm »

Vig claim is 100% the go-to claim for scum in this game, especially now that they know there is one.

I swear, I will never understand this community's blind faith in obviously self-serving claims.

None of those quotes communicates a vig claim to me, and even if they did, scum would absolutely be setting up for a possible vig claim so it proves nothing.
Look, if there is another vig then it's ideal for them to counterclaim now. If there isn't then MiX is IC.

Is it really ideal for them to out themselves and play right into scum's hands? I think that's at the very least up for debate.
Well no you're right. they should not claim of course. They should just shoot MiX tonight.

Well, no: scum!me has bulletproof. Scum should counterclaim me today, not in 2 days and say that I was bulletproof.
Further proof that you are not scum, because no scum in their right mind would ever take the bulletproof modification, it's a dud and I think there was an updated version of this setup once that replaced it.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #522 on: March 02, 2021, 12:39:26 pm »

I forgot that the Traitor has a 1-shot BP. Might be worth counterclaiming then I suppose. It doesn't matter because there will be no counterclaim.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #523 on: March 02, 2021, 12:51:59 pm »

Further proof that you are not scum, because no scum in their right mind would ever take the bulletproof modification, it's a dud and I think there was an updated version of this setup once that replaced it.

Yeah, I agree, but only bulletproof scum would claim vig, so...

I forgot that the Traitor has a 1-shot BP. Might be worth counterclaiming then I suppose. It doesn't matter because there will be no counterclaim.

It's always fun to think that scum won't kill me tonight and will instead counterclaim me. Personally I have kinda resigned myself from scumhunting because I'm just going to die, and that small hope of a counterclaim's what's keeping me going.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #524 on: March 02, 2021, 01:24:18 pm »

Starting a reread.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #525 on: March 02, 2021, 01:35:29 pm »

Starting with a reread of mcmcsalot.

Mcmc flipped JOAT, so we know that mafia picked at least that modification, so town has at least 3 roles with two of them dead.

Space. Space don’t work they just say space stinger space

I am finding you quite confusing :-P

Vote: mcmc

Then it’s working! You scum?

Also, hi everyone! Feels like it's been a while!!

Yea I was shocked when robs told me a new game had opened it was only one game after the last one I played feels like it has been a long long time.

Interaction with Space seems like it doesn't point to anything about Space's alignment.

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Unvote from RVS.

@mathdude, did you in fact find ashersky scummy? He's the only one so far who has pinged any scum bells for me.

Vote: ashersky.

PPE: Yeah, saw that coming...

Ash has not pinged scum bells for me at all. Why do you?

Comments on ash. Sees that the case on ash is weak and starts to poke at it. Makes me feel townier on ash, seems like mcmc thinks ash is unlikely to be mafia or traitor, so wants to put pressure on EFHW for having a semi-unexplained vote.

Actually he mainly just comments on joth D1, which is probably not something someone does with their partner?

Not much to go off with mcmc's posts alone. Looks like I will have to see how others interacted with him.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #526 on: March 02, 2021, 01:36:15 pm »

Also not sure if someone mentioned this, but Robz dying N1 seems more likely that he successfully bodyguarded someone right? So that means a likely N1 kill was saved?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #527 on: March 02, 2021, 01:38:16 pm »

Woah, both brother are dead. But hey, the vig got mcmc, hell yeah!

I need to setup the VC, I thought I was going to die, lol. I probably would've if Robz hadn't protected me, who knows.

Space's locktown, they were pushing mcmc all day long, just look back and see. Everything they said implied mcmc was scum.

So, where do we start today?

I'm going to start reading D2 first and then go back to D1 if I have time.

I'm surprised MiX thinks that Robz protected him.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #528 on: March 02, 2021, 01:40:29 pm »

I’m taking Monday off work because it’s my birthday. So I will probably spend some of it te-reading day 1 for nuggets of truth. But that’s days away.

Scum loves to target each other day 1? Idk that that’s as locky as you think.

True that they like to target each other D1, but I don't think Space likes to put forth decent cases on their scum buddies D1. They more like to put together weak cases that are based on things they don't think other people will hop on the wagon for.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #529 on: March 02, 2021, 01:41:30 pm »

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #530 on: March 02, 2021, 01:43:15 pm »

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

I just stumbled upon this post: hmm, Dylan was already voting for math...

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.

Vote: Dylan, I also find his play overall scummy, and it's a good SoD2 vote regardless.

I have already seen MiX's claim from later D2, and his other posts here really do look like he thought scum and others had caught on to his breadcrumbing, so I'm inclined to believe him.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #531 on: March 02, 2021, 01:44:37 pm »

@faust, do you think Robz was bodyguarding someone who died (if so, who?) or do you think they shot Robz?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #532 on: March 02, 2021, 01:48:15 pm »

I did an EFHW re-read, and I thought my d1 impression of her was that she was at least thinking for herself and not coming over as too scummy. She does flip-flop a bit on how much sympathy she shows for our newbie's predicament, though (#188/#237/#317), which let her put her vote in a convenient place on the mathdude wagon.

Possibly more interesting is the really early game, because she followed mcmc onto Robz before Robz had even joined the game. On its own that's nothing, but then she was also right behind mcmc on Joth from #273, which is the pivot in the middle of her flip-flop on mathdude, which maybe looks a little bit more like something.

Of course, the next thing in this like of thinking is to check who else followed mcmc that much, and how common it was across the rest of d1 for two players to land up next to each other on wagons like that by chance (or design?) anyway.

Another good analysis by Space. I'm pretty certain they are town.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #533 on: March 02, 2021, 01:52:00 pm »

Sorry that took a minute.

Yesterday I found EFHW scummy for laying low, then being flip with MiX, but I find her response to Space and her description of the scum ones of mathdude really off.  The EFHW wagon had no traction yesterday, and I’m not sure that will be any different today, but I’m somewhat buoyed by one of the other people who found her scummy was Robz (the other was MiX) so

Vote: EFHW

I’m not seeing why gkrieg is scummy... this week kind of snuck up on a bunch of us so im cutting all kinds of slack on activity level for now.

I'm curious why you think EFHW's defense to Space's case was not good?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #534 on: March 02, 2021, 01:53:17 pm »

Just reread the game.

Chum to scum:

Space
joth
EFHW
ash
faust
Didds
Dylan
gkrieg

joth is town, ash is townie but fits in a lot of scumteams, Space is obv!town, faust is scum with ash or now, Didds is not doing much but then again she's tunneling EFHW less than I usually am, EFHW is town, Dylan's townie with a lot of bad reads and very scummy pushes that make him more scum than town, gkrieg hasn't done anything that town does yet.

Vote: gkrieg

So the scummiest person on your list is someone why hasn't done anything townie yet? So basically null?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #535 on: March 02, 2021, 01:54:08 pm »

faust is scum with ash
God I wish!

There would've already been a huge fight if they were scum together.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #536 on: March 02, 2021, 01:57:20 pm »

Sorry that took a minute.

Yesterday I found EFHW scummy for laying low, then being flip with MiX, but I find her response to Space and her description of the scum ones of mathdude really off.  The EFHW wagon had no traction yesterday, and I’m not sure that will be any different today, but I’m somewhat buoyed by one of the other people who found her scummy was Robz (the other was MiX) so

Vote: EFHW

I’m not seeing why gkrieg is scummy... this week kind of snuck up on a bunch of us so im cutting all kinds of slack on activity level for now.

Can you be more specific about how I seem off?

Lots of defense, not much offense, the odd exchange with MiX.

Joth, (happy birthday!!) I’m not sure I’ve enough of a sense to sell you or anyone on EFHW, but she seems to be way less invested in scum hunting than townEFHW.  But I’m not ready to scream it from the mountaintops. Just more than I can say about anyone else at this point.

I agree with Didds here, EFHW is not doing very much scum hunting, not really asking anyone any questions, which seems like normal town behavior for her.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #537 on: March 02, 2021, 02:01:05 pm »

No. I don't parse everything he says, because he tends to leave a lot of steps out. I'll try, but if it's too obscure I might just move on. I just know his method works for him, when he's not tunneling me, anyway, so I don't read it as scummy.

Okay.

Hey EFHW, who do you scumread currently? Who do you townread currently? Who would you vote for if you had to? What are you currently rereading? What are you doing in this Day? Cause if you have nothing to do I suggest you reread me and actually try to understand what I'm saying, it's not just rambling even if it looks like it.

I'm trying to play the game and if you just won't read my posts then why the hell do I even bother.

I do read what you say. But you jump around a lot, and the logic behind your conclusions is often obscure, and chances are good you'll change your mind pretty soon, so I wait and see if it comes up again. I've read you closely enough to be townreading you. Unlike many people, I have never scumread you for your style.

I'm OMGUS scumreading Didds. Space is unusually cranky. That's probably more of a towntell than anything. Dylan, gkrieg, ash and joth could easily go either way. Townreading faust.

Why are you townreading faust?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #538 on: March 02, 2021, 02:04:15 pm »

This game is in need of an intervention.

How does MiX make sense as scum here? What, the scumteam just decided to get two members on a mission to push through a quickexile on D1? Come on. MiX and mcmc are seasoned players, and this is terrible play. No way it happens. Believing anything else is just wishful thinking.

Now come the people who will argue that "sure, that may be true, but if MiX is the Traitor then scum would not have been aware of having 2 people on the wagon". Yeah, great, so you case is that MiX can be exactly one scum role that we don't even know is in the game? Sounds to me like a good reason to not exile him.

I disagree that scum doesn't pull a double quickhammer. You can get a lot of mileage out of arguing exactly what you are arguing right now.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #539 on: March 02, 2021, 02:05:42 pm »

Mafia players can have bad games, yes; they don't usually intentionally set themselves up for bad games.

They do make gambits though.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #540 on: March 02, 2021, 02:10:09 pm »

And the vig claim, unfortunately, doesn't give MiX any town points in my book, if anything it's the opposite, though I suppose we should consider keeping him alive strategically if there's no counterclaim.
Lol are you insane?

Agreed with faust here.

Also, unvote
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #541 on: March 02, 2021, 02:12:10 pm »

Vote: SpaceAnemone now that there is no longer a reason not to.

Do you think my read's that bad?
Well... I didn't see much in your read other than "Space voted for mcmc". Space is capable of bussing and mcmc was never in any danger of being exiled, so that doesn't exactly appeal to me. And I do think that I know Space better than you. They have been very illogical in their pursuit of your wagon; Space likes to point out that when I'm not making sense, I'm scum; the same holds true for them.

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon. Frankly, I don't think we can rule out bad play from the scum team because the quickhammer was bad play and it happened.
A quickhammer isn't bad play. It would have been decent if mcmc thought that mathdude might flip Traitor.

Wait, wouldn't it be way worse if math was traitor?
Well, the way I see it, mcmc was trying to grab some towncred with that quote that he pulled.
(now that I think of it... it is interesting that he grabbed that quote. Makes me think scum were Traitor-hunting all along, so they probably didn't recruit.)

How has Space been illogical in pursuit of MiX's wagon?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #542 on: March 02, 2021, 02:13:29 pm »

Question for the MiX voters: What exactly do you think was going on at the end of D1, with MiX urging the hammer and mcmc executing it?

It wasn't nearly deadline yet, and MiX was creating an artificial sense of urgency, which mcmc was capitalising on. MiX was taking a clearly terrible course of action in pushing for an immediate exile without thinking through any of the consequences of the claim or how to tease information out of it properly. He was totally failing to engage with posts from people like me or Robz, saying that we should hold off on mathdude, or sort the partial claim out more sensibly. He was reacting to almost everything except those voice-of-reason posts, and claiming he was "on fire" while doing so. If we want not to exile MiX, please convince me that letting him remain in the game to continue that kind of play is actually beneficial to my town wincon.
Just look at that reasoning. There is nothing in here on wagon composition, not even a mention of the fact that this argument would make it so that there are 2 scum on the wagon, no analysis of whether MiX is Traitor or teammate, no nothing.

I think Space decided N1 that MiX would be a good push and then didn't incorporate mcmc's flip into that already premade case.

I see, you answer that here. Hmmmm, that is a good point.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #543 on: March 02, 2021, 02:14:55 pm »

I know that faust holds an extremely low opinion of the utiility of vigs and thinks that they should never shoot and probably should self-vote on day 1 just in case, but the vig we have in this game seems pretty good and maybe worth keeping alive.
i have no idea where this is coming from but it is completely inaccurate.
It's entirely possible I'm mixing you up with someone else. Is it ash? I know there's people on this forum who are really down on vigs.
I remember that discussion but not who fell on which side. I tried to find the thread that this discussion happened in, no success. I did however stumble upon this gem.

lol
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #544 on: March 02, 2021, 02:15:55 pm »

(sorry; am in physical pain but am getting better so will be more cheerful soon!)

I hope you feel better soon!
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #545 on: March 02, 2021, 02:19:27 pm »

It should be clear to anyone reading that I would not possibly be mcmc's partner here. You had a bit of an (albeit terrible) argument when it came to MiX, seeing as he was the alternative wagon - there the claim would be that it was an attempt to save MiX. But now we know it was town v town, so there is literally zero reason for any scumteam to put all their votes behind a bad misexile.

How should this be clear?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #546 on: March 02, 2021, 02:20:29 pm »

Well... I didn't see much in your read other than "Space voted for mcmc". Space is capable of bussing and mcmc was never in any danger of being exiled, so that doesn't exactly appeal to me. And I do think that I know Space better than you. They have been very illogical in their pursuit of your wagon; Space likes to point out that when I'm not making sense, I'm scum; the same holds true for them.

Yep, and I've already said that your support of MiX, and your pushing for the quick exile of mathdude aren't sensible, and so you're high up my scum list.


Question for the MiX voters: What exactly do you think was going on at the end of D1, with MiX urging the hammer and mcmc executing it?

It wasn't nearly deadline yet, and MiX was creating an artificial sense of urgency, which mcmc was capitalising on. MiX was taking a clearly terrible course of action in pushing for an immediate exile without thinking through any of the consequences of the claim or how to tease information out of it properly. He was totally failing to engage with posts from people like me or Robz, saying that we should hold off on mathdude, or sort the partial claim out more sensibly. He was reacting to almost everything except those voice-of-reason posts, and claiming he was "on fire" while doing so. If we want not to exile MiX, please convince me that letting him remain in the game to continue that kind of play is actually beneficial to my town wincon.
Just look at that reasoning. There is nothing in here on wagon composition, not even a mention of the fact that this argument would make it so that there are 2 scum on the wagon, no analysis of whether MiX is Traitor or teammate, no nothing.

I think Space decided N1 that MiX would be a good push and then didn't incorporate mcmc's flip into that already premade case.

There doesn't need to be an argument on wagon composition for MiX's eod1 to look terrible. MiX failing to engage with me or Robz urging moderation isn't dependent on whether there are 2 scum on the wagon or not, so why are you saying that it matters to my argument there?

As for analysing wagons, we lost a bodyguard, so we can't even tell whether scum tried to kill on-wagon or off-wagon, and the scummy hammer ended up coming from now-known scum. I did spend a while looking at the voting patterns, and I've already mentioned that I think joth is likely town because of it, given that mcmc doesn't really seem to have bussed d1 in other recent scumgames. Is that the kind of post you're trying to accuse me of not having made, or do you just need the one-scum-in-this-pool sort of predictions I sometimes make, so that then you can accuse me of being scummy for assuming or not assuming where the potential traitor fits in, since those are a lot harder to deduce well when we don't even know if all the scumteam are aware of each other?

Vote:  faust

This is a good defense. Not sure yet if the case makes faust scum though.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #547 on: March 02, 2021, 02:21:36 pm »

@faust: You're going to have more traction telling us we're wrong if you provide an alternate case/wagon.

This was a conclusion I'd come to independently before I say joth post this. Faust was making a big noise asking how MiX was scummy. MiX himself has now said he was being openly scummy to hide his PR, which makes some sense but was unfortunately calibrated, since I found his levels of bad arguments so over-the-top noisy and anti-town as to be kind of offensive. And yet faust kept going back to asking about how people could read MiX scummy, which was not at all moving the conversation onto other possible vote targets.
Oh, is this the OMGUS arriving?

I think I said multiple times that I was waiting for gkrieg and Dylan to answer my questions before moving on with my arguments. I mean, there was time; it's not like I could know that people would be so eager to get that quixile in.

But also, faust doesn't really address the defense here, instead just calls for OMGUS. Maybe he responds to the defense later?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #548 on: March 02, 2021, 02:23:31 pm »

I forgot that the Traitor has a 1-shot BP. Might be worth counterclaiming then I suppose. It doesn't matter because there will be no counterclaim.

If mathdude were still alive, I would bet that faust is coaching here, but alas.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #549 on: March 02, 2021, 03:20:18 pm »

Vote Count 2.3:

MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
gkrieg (1): MiX
SpaceAnenome (1): faust
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (4): EFHW, Joth, Ashersky, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #550 on: March 02, 2021, 03:23:59 pm »

Sorry I've been so absent today, I'm catching up now.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #551 on: March 02, 2021, 03:37:18 pm »

Are you done gkrieg? I was waiting for you to put down a vote before responding to your posts, but if you have to do a big D1 reread or will be away for a while, I'll just do it some time later.

Sorry I've been so absent today, I'm catching up now.

Ooooh both people I think are scum are rereading, and generally make high effort posts when coming to the thread! This is fun.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #552 on: March 02, 2021, 04:05:52 pm »

Are you done gkrieg? I was waiting for you to put down a vote before responding to your posts, but if you have to do a big D1 reread or will be away for a while, I'll just do it some time later.

Sorry I've been so absent today, I'm catching up now.

Ooooh both people I think are scum are rereading, and generally make high effort posts when coming to the thread! This is fun.

Sorry, got pulled away with other things. I had some outstanding questions in my posts, and I do want to go back and reread D1 before I vote. I also just have to collect my thoughts by rereading the stuff I just wrote.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #553 on: March 02, 2021, 04:11:05 pm »

I'm townie on MiX, Space, and ash in that order.

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW. I think EFHW is the scummiest of the three. Still waiting to see how the faust/Space faceoff goes.

Haven't heard much from Didds, although I like what I have seen her post.

Null on Dylan.

Not super strong reads though.
vote: EFHW
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #554 on: March 02, 2021, 04:34:12 pm »

Hey gkrieg, were we mafia partners in a previous iteration of this setup?  I have vague recollections of us choosing no PRs and then lying about a bunch of stuff...and of course winning.  (I feel like we win a lot when we are the bad guys.)

Or was that a different setup?

Also, what's it called when you vote someone just for voting you?  Man, it's been a long time since I played.

vote: gkrieg

This is the first post I've found in my reread that struck me as noteworthy. Could be traitor signaling.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #555 on: March 02, 2021, 04:51:45 pm »

Ok. I'm caught up. Sorry to disappoint a little bit compared to my normal standards, MiX, but I don't have a ton of time to sit and do a full thing right this second, and there was a lot to keep track of in the last several pages.

Concerning MiX -
MiX, in your quote all of your breadcrumbs, I honestly didn't see anything in there that went beyond the type of, um, let's say exuberant posts that you've done as pretty much any roll.

On your conflict with Space here, I remember one of my earliest games with you, Ash's last scum game I believe, even though I read you as scum incorrectly, I largely followed the logic of your posts and saw them as reasonable, even if you did jump around and change your mind a lot like you do. Like Space said, there were points in this game I really just couldn't follow what you were saying or what your points were, so I get where Space was coming from there. I mean you pulled several separate quotes like a vote for Joth, a stated scum read on math, and said that was proof of the point you are trying to make. Your whole meta (in my mind) is that you jump around, change your mind, push a bunch of different buttons to see what happens, so when you don't explicitly link your thoughts together in thread, it just all looks like noise.

Nice shot.

On faust and Ash -
It's seems interesting to me that D1 they were on the same page at least on mathdude, but they seem to be butting heads a bit today. There's probably nothing there, but a scum in that pair wouldn't surprise me.

Regarding mcmc and setup -
I think I saw that someone mentioned mcmc likely being more hesitant to hammer math given those thoughts if scum hadn't recruited the traitor, but I'm not gonna go back and read all of that again this second, but I tend to agree that makes recruiting more like likely to have been chosen, UNLESS mcmc thought the potential towncred for hammering a traitor was worth the tradeoff of losing the teammate. He obviously at least thought eliminating a PR was worth looking scummy for the hammer, which makes me think scum might have loaded up on powers, and getting rid of a town PR D1 was a big deal for them.

Re: Robz -
I doubt he was a direct target unless that was who mcmc would shoot D1. I don't think Robz was anywhere near lock-town, which means he was a pretty viable misexile target for scum.

I guess my quick hit reads would be MiX is town by way of claim until proven otherwise. Space is pretty towny to me; in the gambit game, I feel like everything read as super logical and straight forward, which aligns with their meta, but here there's the logic mixed with a degree of emotion that feels more genuine than the other game. I could be wrong, but I'm gonna go forward on that assumption for now. Joth seems towny because of the mcmc interactions. I don't remember mcmc being the kind of player to like bussing early, so that would have been a weird D1 for him.  Faust and Ash read slightly towny to me independently, but looking at the game there's a decent chance one is scum, but that's just my gut with no solid evidence, so whatever. EFHW, Didds, and gkrieg are due for a reread, especially all gkrieg's recent catching up posts, but that'll have to be later.

ppe several
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #556 on: March 02, 2021, 05:04:39 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

This was, in retrospect, a bad case. I also think some people noticed it was a sort of bad case at the time. But what's interesting is it's a strategically timed case. Right as the mathdude wagon was sputtering out, ash comes in with something "concrete" to revv it back to life. Case in point, it totally worked on me:

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.

Ok, here's an interesting post given the flips we know already:

Time for a pops thing.

Would exile: mathdude, Robz, mcmc

Would not stop the exile of: joth, MiX, Space, EFHW, WCD

Do not want to exile: gkrieg, faust, dylan

That's way more null reads than I prefer, and I feel like I probably shoehorned at least one player into the would exile pile just to avoid even more null.

For reasoning, the mathdude stuff I've said.  I generally find that if the Brothers KaraMcRobz are buddying each other, they are often not of the same alignment.

Putting two town and a scum on his would exile (and of course, voting for one of the towns) feels like pretty standard mafia play.

Reading further on, I can 't shake the feeling that ashersky was very much the driver of the mathdude wagon and that he started driving it in earnest after THE POST, which is also where mathdude PR-slipped.

I'm going with vote: ashersky

It's not the most extensive case, but the content and timing of his posts around the mathdude wagon paint a picture of a strong player pushing a wagon hard but not looking like he was pushing it too hard. And that possible traitor call is just icing (though if Ash flips traitor, well, nothing I saw in the reread rules out gkrieg as partner). There's also this soft defense:

gkrieg's absence is unfortunate, but I do think that makes him more likely to be town.  Does mafia!gkrieg know that he can skate by with a no-show Day 1?  Yeah, he does.  Does he actually do that?  I highly doubt it.  That's just from my experience though.

Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #557 on: March 02, 2021, 05:13:21 pm »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Is it just me, or did you say you thought joth was scummy because mcmc voted for him early, and then do a full 180 and agree with me that it actually makes joth seem townier, given that I can't find evidence of mcmc bussing during d1 in any recent scumgames?

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.

PPE 1
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #558 on: March 02, 2021, 05:20:50 pm »

I think I said multiple times that I was waiting for gkrieg and Dylan to answer my questions before moving on with my arguments. I mean, there was time; it's not like I could know that people would be so eager to get that quixile in.

The following really doesn't feel like the voice of someone urging moderation and suggesting that we let claims take their course and let everyone speak. I read it as direct encouragement of the quixile mob:

Intent to make someone hammer math

That's a traitor claim if I've ever seen one.
Seconded.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #559 on: March 02, 2021, 05:29:58 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

This was, in retrospect, a bad case. I also think some people noticed it was a sort of bad case at the time. But what's interesting is it's a strategically timed case. Right as the mathdude wagon was sputtering out, ash comes in with something "concrete" to revv it back to life. Case in point, it totally worked on me:

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

Ok, this I find compelling.

Let's give vote: mathdude a try.

Ok, here's an interesting post given the flips we know already:

Time for a pops thing.

Would exile: mathdude, Robz, mcmc

Would not stop the exile of: joth, MiX, Space, EFHW, WCD

Do not want to exile: gkrieg, faust, dylan

That's way more null reads than I prefer, and I feel like I probably shoehorned at least one player into the would exile pile just to avoid even more null.

For reasoning, the mathdude stuff I've said.  I generally find that if the Brothers KaraMcRobz are buddying each other, they are often not of the same alignment.

Putting two town and a scum on his would exile (and of course, voting for one of the towns) feels like pretty standard mafia play.

Reading further on, I can 't shake the feeling that ashersky was very much the driver of the mathdude wagon and that he started driving it in earnest after THE POST, which is also where mathdude PR-slipped.

I'm going with vote: ashersky

It's not the most extensive case, but the content and timing of his posts around the mathdude wagon paint a picture of a strong player pushing a wagon hard but not looking like he was pushing it too hard. And that possible traitor call is just icing (though if Ash flips traitor, well, nothing I saw in the reread rules out gkrieg as partner). There's also this soft defense:

gkrieg's absence is unfortunate, but I do think that makes him more likely to be town.  Does mafia!gkrieg know that he can skate by with a no-show Day 1?  Yeah, he does.  Does he actually do that?  I highly doubt it.  That's just from my experience though.

I think people hopefully learned from my mistake in this setup and aren't so blatant when they are the traitor.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #560 on: March 02, 2021, 05:31:24 pm »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Is it just me, or did you say you thought joth was scummy because mcmc voted for him early, and then do a full 180 and agree with me that it actually makes joth seem townier, given that I can't find evidence of mcmc bussing during d1 in any recent scumgames?

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.

PPE 1

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #561 on: March 02, 2021, 06:00:40 pm »

Sorry that took a minute.

Yesterday I found EFHW scummy for laying low, then being flip with MiX, but I find her response to Space and her description of the scum ones of mathdude really off.  The EFHW wagon had no traction yesterday, and I’m not sure that will be any different today, but I’m somewhat buoyed by one of the other people who found her scummy was Robz (the other was MiX) so

Vote: EFHW

I’m not seeing why gkrieg is scummy... this week kind of snuck up on a bunch of us so im cutting all kinds of slack on activity level for now.

I'm curious why you think EFHW's defense to Space's case was not good?

(On my phone do forgive the paraphrasing) she essentially said that mathdude was being super scummy so she shouldn’t get any grief for being on his wagon. The lack of introspection is not very EFHW-y, especially in light of math’s claim and his newness to our group. All in all, it read to me as “eh...”
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #562 on: March 03, 2021, 12:55:46 am »

I think I said multiple times that I was waiting for gkrieg and Dylan to answer my questions before moving on with my arguments. I mean, there was time; it's not like I could know that people would be so eager to get that quixile in.

The following really doesn't feel like the voice of someone urging moderation and suggesting that we let claims take their course and let everyone speak. I read it as direct encouragement of the quixile mob:

Intent to make someone hammer math

That's a traitor claim if I've ever seen one.
Seconded.
I was talking about your accusation regarding my play today in that quote.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #563 on: March 03, 2021, 04:06:06 am »

Re: Robz -
I doubt he was a direct target unless that was who mcmc would shoot D1. I don't think Robz was anywhere near lock-town, which means he was a pretty viable misexile target for scum.
So wou do you think the target would have been?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #564 on: March 03, 2021, 04:06:49 am »

Re: Robz -
I doubt he was a direct target unless that was who mcmc would shoot D1. I don't think Robz was anywhere near lock-town, which means he was a pretty viable misexile target for scum.
So wou who do you think the target would have been?
EBWOP

(Not sure what happened there...)
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #565 on: March 03, 2021, 04:08:38 am »

Vote: gkrieg
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #566 on: March 03, 2021, 04:14:29 am »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Is it just me, or did you say you thought joth was scummy because mcmc voted for him early, and then do a full 180 and agree with me that it actually makes joth seem townier, given that I can't find evidence of mcmc bussing during d1 in any recent scumgames?

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.

PPE 1

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.
Actually, what you do is more like a complete 360, since this post comes after:

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #567 on: March 03, 2021, 04:23:56 am »

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

I just stumbled upon this post: hmm, Dylan was already voting for math...

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.

Vote: Dylan, I also find his play overall scummy, and it's a good SoD2 vote regardless.

I have already seen MiX's claim from later D2, and his other posts here really do look like he thought scum and others had caught on to his breadcrumbing, so I'm inclined to believe him.

What does this post have to do with my claim?

So the scummiest person on your list is someone why hasn't done anything townie yet? So basically null?

Considering the actual game posts you'd made at this point, not doing anything townie is the same as being scummy. I mean, at most you voted me D1, and that's just a null-to-scummy thing to do.

I'm townie on MiX, Space, and ash in that order.

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW. I think EFHW is the scummiest of the three. Still waiting to see how the faust/Space faceoff goes.

Haven't heard much from Didds, although I like what I have seen her post.

Null on Dylan.

Not super strong reads though.
vote: EFHW

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.

Don't these posts contradict each other?

PPE: Ah! faust has my locktown status now.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #568 on: March 03, 2021, 06:59:00 am »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #569 on: March 03, 2021, 06:59:36 am »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

Vote: ash

I mean you did claim role cop...
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #570 on: March 03, 2021, 07:00:49 am »

ash/gkrieg scum team? Or is ash making a play? Dare I say it.......................................is he executing a plan?

Who's around? I need to hear outside opinions on this.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #571 on: March 03, 2021, 07:01:13 am »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

Vote: ash

I mean you did claim role cop...

I really think it’s better to find the other mafia member, don’t you?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #572 on: March 03, 2021, 07:03:37 am »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

Vote: ash

I mean you did claim role cop...

I really think it’s better to find the other mafia member, don’t you?

We can do that tomorrow, assuming you're telling the truth. Besides, I thought this is what you wanted me to do, honestly.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #573 on: March 03, 2021, 07:07:07 am »

My point being: whether you believe me or not, the exile should be from outside the two of us.  It’s easy enough to pick us off one after the other when time requires it.

 (That time probably comes after one of us is NK’ed, making it easy to know who lied.  Or do they leave us both alive, to continue to sow confusion?)

MiX, I promise not to shoot you tonight if you promise not to shoot me.  Trust me on this.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #574 on: March 03, 2021, 07:09:56 am »

My point being: whether you believe me or not, the exile should be from outside the two of us.  It’s easy enough to pick us off one after the other when time requires it.

 (That time probably comes after one of us is NK’ed, making it easy to know who lied.  Or do they leave us both alive, to continue to sow confusion?)

MiX, I promise not to shoot you tonight if you promise not to shoot me.  Trust me on this.

This would be true if there was a world where I am scum, which there is not. I just hope that the majority of town can see this. Unless you think I decided to claim vig EoD1 to quickexile math?

I won't discuss vigging strategies publicly, but I do have to say that your promise isn't completely off the wall, so it's not scummy. Whatever that has to do with anything.

Is this how you make people engage with the thread? I'm so for this play, I can't wait to see what happens.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #575 on: March 03, 2021, 07:14:04 am »

If it helps, I attempted to aim the vig shot at MiX in my QT last night.  I am not lying. 
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #576 on: March 03, 2021, 07:16:47 am »

If it helps, I attempted to aim the vig shot at MiX in my QT last night.  I am not lying.
So like... mcmc died because mafia decided it would be a good idea to shoot themselves?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #577 on: March 03, 2021, 07:18:03 am »

If it helps, I attempted to aim the vig shot at MiX in my QT last night.  I am not lying.
So like... mcmc died because mafia decided it would be a good idea to shoot themselves?

Seems extremely unlikely to me. 
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #578 on: March 03, 2021, 07:21:27 am »

I am not sure what this is all about but I think I agree that we should exile outside of MiX/ash. I don't want to explain why, so you'll just have to trust me on this.

What I don't agree with is that the exile should be me. Let's exile gkrieg instead.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #579 on: March 03, 2021, 07:22:12 am »

If it helps, I attempted to aim the vig shot at MiX in my QT last night.  I am not lying.

Yeah cause you're scum, lol?

I love this. I love this so much. Tell me when to stop reacting to your posts ash, I can't help but look at them and go "wooooooow, that's sooooooo cooooool!"

If it helps, I attempted to aim the vig shot at MiX in my QT last night.  I am not lying.
So like... mcmc died because mafia decided it would be a good idea to shoot themselves?

Clearly scum's foresight is huge, they knew that: I was getting vigged, the bodyguard was going to protect me, and that killing mcmc's worth this. I mean, the second one is actually something I assumed, but how could scum even know both vig and bodyguard are in play? Pick 3 scum PRs?? And instead of killing a PR, NK a mate??

Why am I even talking, I'm having way too much fun with this. I'm also having fun saying how much fun I'm having.

I am not sure what this is all about but I think I agree that we should exile outside of MiX/ash. I don't want to explain why, so you'll just have to trust me on this.

What I don't agree with is that the exile should be me. Let's exile gkrieg instead.

Okay, fine, but I'm doing the ash maneuver and hammering myself. That's the IC's job after all, right? Oh wait I'm counterclaimed now lol.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #580 on: March 03, 2021, 08:01:12 am »

Ok, what am I missing... we have a claim and a counterclaim and people don’t want to exile either of them? Am I on PUNK’D? Someone explain this to me using small words.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #581 on: March 03, 2021, 08:02:51 am »

“you'll just have to trust me on this.”

Here’s the thing: I don’t and I won’t.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #582 on: March 03, 2021, 08:05:48 am »

Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #583 on: March 03, 2021, 08:08:23 am »

Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?

It's a good case. I really like it. I think it makes you town. I'm voting ash partially because of it. But I don't think ash's push on math isn't something town!ash wouldn't do: as much as it was wrong, there were a lot of people buying it, mostly because, well, it made sense, in its own twisted way.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #584 on: March 03, 2021, 08:13:12 am »

Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?
I wasn't impressed. But here are some comments. The case seems to consist of 2 pieces:

- ash pushed mathdude because he knew that he was a PR
- ash put exactly one scum in his "would exile" list.

With regards to the first point: if scum picked out a PR it makes way more sense for them to just NK that player rather than tell everyone about it and potentially risk protection. This also ignores that mcmc was on the mathdude wagon and that mcmc's partner is way more likely to be off-wagon.
Second part is fair enough but one scum in three players is also just the expected value. It is some indication but not a very compelling case. Especially since unless mafia recruited scum!ash knew at most one other scum anyways.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #585 on: March 03, 2021, 08:16:03 am »

Ok, and why don't you support exiling either of the two claimed vigs?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #586 on: March 03, 2021, 08:17:54 am »

Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?
I wasn't impressed. But here are some comments. The case seems to consist of 2 pieces:

- ash pushed mathdude because he knew that he was a PR
- ash put exactly one scum in his "would exile" list.

With regards to the first point: if scum picked out a PR it makes way more sense for them to just NK that player rather than tell everyone about it and potentially risk protection. This also ignores that mcmc was on the mathdude wagon and that mcmc's partner is way more likely to be off-wagon.
Second part is fair enough but one scum in three players is also just the expected value. It is some indication but not a very compelling case. Especially since unless mafia recruited scum!ash knew at most one other scum anyways.

Scum!ash would definitely say math is a PR is public and push him anyway, that's just who he is. Besides, it actually helps build the math wagon, especially if the scumteam thinks quickexiling a PR's good, which is at least what mcmc thought.

I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #587 on: March 03, 2021, 08:26:07 am »

Here is a fun little tidbit: ashersky has been scum in a Stack the Deck before, and argued for selecting JOAT, Daychat and Recruit Traitor.

This is the mafia QT from then: https://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/Ytmu9saymai
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #588 on: March 03, 2021, 08:38:10 am »

Here is a fun little tidbit: ashersky has been scum in a Stack the Deck before, and argued for selecting JOAT, Daychat and Recruit Traitor.

This is the mafia QT from then: https://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/Ytmu9saymai

This IS interesting, but I would also take an 8-year-old game with a grain of salt.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #589 on: March 03, 2021, 08:43:36 am »

I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Wait, the Traitor knows who the mafia are? Where did you obtain this information?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #590 on: March 03, 2021, 08:46:09 am »

It's true, but it is certainly annoying that it wasn't mentioned anywhere.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #591 on: March 03, 2021, 08:48:13 am »

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #592 on: March 03, 2021, 08:48:34 am »

Just to be sure -- Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #593 on: March 03, 2021, 08:50:28 am »

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Is this post a scumslip and a townslip at the same time?

There is no way for a Traitor to be recruited after game start, right?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #594 on: March 03, 2021, 08:55:11 am »

I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Wait, the Traitor knows who the mafia are? Where did you obtain this information?

From the setup?

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Is this post a scumslip and a townslip at the same time?

There is no way for a Traitor to be recruited after game start, right?

Hmm...I'm not sure about that. Why are traitors not properly defined...

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>

If you read the QT faust posted, you'd know that this is a scumslip! Can I apply an 8-year-old scum QT as a scumtell playbook?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #595 on: March 03, 2021, 08:58:23 am »

I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Wait, the Traitor knows who the mafia are? Where did you obtain this information?

From the setup?
This is an acceptable answer. It should really have been clarified in the setup post for this game though.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #596 on: March 03, 2021, 08:58:49 am »

Can I be IC now?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #597 on: March 03, 2021, 08:59:28 am »

Can I be IC now?

I'm giving you a day pass until I die, is that enough?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #598 on: March 03, 2021, 09:04:47 am »

I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Wait, the Traitor knows who the mafia are? Where did you obtain this information?

It's in the "standard" definition of traitor on mafiascum so I've just been assuming it's true here.

Swowl, can you confirm that a traitor, if there is one, would know who their partners are?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #599 on: March 03, 2021, 09:06:53 am »

Also I'm still waiting on someone to help me out on this.

Ok, what am I missing... we have a claim and a counterclaim and people don’t want to exile either of them? Am I on PUNK’D? Someone explain this to me using small words.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #600 on: March 03, 2021, 09:14:06 am »

Also I'm still waiting on someone to help me out on this.

Ok, what am I missing... we have a claim and a counterclaim and people don’t want to exile either of them? Am I on PUNK’D? Someone explain this to me using small words.

faust won't explain, ash will neither, I don't think you'd understand me even if I tried, and I don't think EFHW has properly internalized what's happening yet.

I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Wait, the Traitor knows who the mafia are? Where did you obtain this information?

It's in the "standard" definition of traitor on mafiascum so I've just been assuming it's true here.

Swowl, can you confirm that a traitor, if there is one, would know who their partners are?

And also:

If scum shoots the traitor, are they recruited?

I presume not, but as the Vig, I really want the 1-shot bulletproof to only stop me.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #601 on: March 03, 2021, 09:26:46 am »

Just to be sure -- Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?

If scum shoots the traitor, are they recruited?

Boy do I feel stupid right now.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #602 on: March 03, 2021, 09:47:37 am »

Also I'm still waiting on someone to help me out on this.

Ok, what am I missing... we have a claim and a counterclaim and people don’t want to exile either of them? Am I on PUNK’D? Someone explain this to me using small words.

Same, same.

Come on, MiX. I know you can do it!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #603 on: March 03, 2021, 10:04:43 am »

Also I'm still waiting on someone to help me out on this.

Ok, what am I missing... we have a claim and a counterclaim and people don’t want to exile either of them? Am I on PUNK’D? Someone explain this to me using small words.

Same, same.

Come on, MiX. I know you can do it!

Fine! But I'll do it for you, not joth.

So, from how I understand it, ash is simultaneously claiming 1 of 3 things:

- ash is a PR, and this is his way of living next night while simultaneously letting me live, which means he saves 2 PRs at once. Scum won't kill him because...

- ash is Traitor, and he's quite literally counterclaiming me. Town doesn't exile him because of the first case, and scum doesn't NK him. When I die, he'll simply claim the first (or third) case.

- ash is a VT, and is doing this because he thinks there's no PRs or just because he townreads me, perhaps so scum NKs him if they recruited the traitor.

Of course, he can be normal scum, but he's not claiming that.

Now, which of these is it? I have no idea. But this is my rationalization of this play.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #604 on: March 03, 2021, 10:35:09 am »

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #605 on: March 03, 2021, 10:42:41 am »

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.

Because it's ash. To be fair, I am voting for him.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #606 on: March 03, 2021, 10:45:00 am »

Last question (for now)... why are we trying to ascertain that if scum shoots the traitor, they are recruited? Is there some other way to recruit them?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #607 on: March 03, 2021, 10:45:52 am »

Last question (for now)... why are we trying to ascertain that if scum shoots the traitor, they are recruited? Is there some other way to recruit them?
Yes, a pregame modification that can be chosen by scum.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #608 on: March 03, 2021, 10:52:35 am »

Last question (for now)... why are we trying to ascertain that if scum shoots the traitor, they are recruited? Is there some other way to recruit them?
Yes, a pregame modification that can be chosen by scum.

So, if they chose that they started with 3 scum? and if they didn’t the traitor has to be recruited? Or does the traitor inherit the scum role?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #609 on: March 03, 2021, 11:44:57 am »

Last question (for now)... why are we trying to ascertain that if scum shoots the traitor, they are recruited? Is there some other way to recruit them?
Yes, a pregame modification that can be chosen by scum.

So, if they chose that they started with 3 scum? and if they didn’t the traitor has to be recruited? Or does the traitor inherit the scum role?
Yes.
It's unclear and what we are trying to find out. There is no such mechanic mentioned in the setup, so I would assume that nothing special happens when mafia shoots the Traitor.
The Traitor gets the nightkill when the other mafia members are dead; this part is in the setup.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #610 on: March 03, 2021, 12:04:10 pm »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Is it just me, or did you say you thought joth was scummy because mcmc voted for him early, and then do a full 180 and agree with me that it actually makes joth seem townier, given that I can't find evidence of mcmc bussing during d1 in any recent scumgames?

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.

PPE 1

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.
Actually, what you do is more like a complete 360, since this post comes after:

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW.

True, I don't think joth has done other townie things even though the mcmc stuff give him town points.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #611 on: March 03, 2021, 12:05:52 pm »

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

I just stumbled upon this post: hmm, Dylan was already voting for math...

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.

Vote: Dylan, I also find his play overall scummy, and it's a good SoD2 vote regardless.

I have already seen MiX's claim from later D2, and his other posts here really do look like he thought scum and others had caught on to his breadcrumbing, so I'm inclined to believe him.

What does this post have to do with my claim?

Oops, definitely pulled the wrong quote

Quote
So the scummiest person on your list is someone why hasn't done anything townie yet? So basically null?

Considering the actual game posts you'd made at this point, not doing anything townie is the same as being scummy. I mean, at most you voted me D1, and that's just a null-to-scummy thing to do.

You think town are somehow less likely to vote for you D1?

Quote
I'm townie on MiX, Space, and ash in that order.

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW. I think EFHW is the scummiest of the three. Still waiting to see how the faust/Space faceoff goes.

Haven't heard much from Didds, although I like what I have seen her post.

Null on Dylan.

Not super strong reads though.
vote: EFHW

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.

Don't these posts contradict each other?

PPE: Ah! faust has my locktown status now.

See my response to faust.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #612 on: March 03, 2021, 12:06:14 pm »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

This is interesting.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #613 on: March 03, 2021, 12:07:15 pm »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

Vote: ash

I mean you did claim role cop...

I really think it’s better to find the other mafia member, don’t you?

Especially interesting because ash is not really in any danger of being exiled, so why would he counterclaim, especially so late.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #614 on: March 03, 2021, 12:09:29 pm »

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.

Please join me on the ash wagon.

If I'm understanding MiX correctly, the best-case scenario is that ash is lying town.

EAL.

vote: ashersky
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #615 on: March 03, 2021, 12:20:57 pm »

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.

Please join me on the ash wagon.

If I'm understanding MiX correctly, the best-case scenario is that ash is lying town.

EAL.

vote: ashersky

I'm a sucker for the sweet talk, Joth.

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #616 on: March 03, 2021, 12:22:10 pm »

Can I be IC now?

Lol, you want to be IC from not knowing the setup? Aren't you the one that is always against using this as a townslip?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #617 on: March 03, 2021, 12:24:53 pm »

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.

I'm pretty sure it is just in one of the cases that he is bad for town, but in that case, it is good for town because it points him out as the traitor, so I'm pretty sure it's win-win-better. Definitely don't want to exile ash now.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #618 on: March 03, 2021, 12:52:14 pm »

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Is this post a scumslip and a townslip at the same time?

There is no way for a Traitor to be recruited after game start, right?

I asked a related question in my QT a few days ago, so I assume that's why I used QT code by mistake. I thought it was part of the traitor role that if they are nk'd they get recruited instead of dying. Is that just in some games?
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #619 on: March 03, 2021, 12:58:04 pm »

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Is this post a scumslip and a townslip at the same time?

There is no way for a Traitor to be recruited after game start, right?

I asked a related question in my QT a few days ago, so I assume that's why I used QT code by mistake. I thought it was part of the traitor role that if they are nk'd they get recruited instead of dying. Is that just in some games?

Yes, although I don't remember a f.ds game that didn't have that.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #620 on: March 03, 2021, 01:59:07 pm »

I'm glad MiX could come up with some explanation of ash's behavior, because I was very perplexed. I don't completely agree, but I'm starting to see some value in not exiling either of them.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #621 on: March 03, 2021, 02:00:29 pm »

I'm glad MiX could come up with some explanation of ash's behavior, because I was very perplexed. I don't completely agree, but I'm starting to see some value in not exiling either of them.

Please, for the love of the mafia gods, articulate that value for us dunces over here that still think we should be exiling people we think are scum.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #622 on: March 03, 2021, 02:05:05 pm »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Is it just me, or did you say you thought joth was scummy because mcmc voted for him early, and then do a full 180 and agree with me that it actually makes joth seem townier, given that I can't find evidence of mcmc bussing during d1 in any recent scumgames?

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.

PPE 1

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.
Actually, what you do is more like a complete 360, since this post comes after:

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW.

True, I don't think joth has done other townie things even though the mcmc stuff give him town points.
So when you said you did a complete 180 you were lying? Good to know.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #623 on: March 03, 2021, 02:05:47 pm »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

Vote: ash

I mean you did claim role cop...

I really think it’s better to find the other mafia member, don’t you?

Especially interesting because ash is not really in any danger of being exiled, so why would he counterclaim, especially so late.
It was actually his first post since the claim.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #624 on: March 03, 2021, 02:06:13 pm »

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.

Please join me on the ash wagon.

If I'm understanding MiX correctly, the best-case scenario is that ash is lying town.

EAL.

vote: ashersky

I'm a sucker for the sweet talk, Joth.

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
It's because gkrieg is scum.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #625 on: March 03, 2021, 02:07:02 pm »

Can I be IC now?

Lol, you want to be IC from not knowing the setup? Aren't you the one that is always against using this as a townslip?
I don't think I am?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #626 on: March 03, 2021, 02:10:51 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #627 on: March 03, 2021, 02:30:24 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

Terrible? I thought all the cool kids were hoping on math's wagon.

Thank you!

Okay, so why don’t we exile Ash now? In at least two of those options, he’s bad for town.

Please join me on the ash wagon.

If I'm understanding MiX correctly, the best-case scenario is that ash is lying town.

EAL.

vote: ashersky

I'm a sucker for the sweet talk, Joth.

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
It's because gkrieg is scum.

What if I told you. That they are both scum. Wow, right? Sometimes the game is that easy.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #628 on: March 03, 2021, 02:50:21 pm »

I'm glad MiX could come up with some explanation of ash's behavior, because I was very perplexed. I don't completely agree, but I'm starting to see some value in not exiling either of them.

Please, for the love of the mafia gods, articulate that value for us dunces over here that still think we should be exiling people we think are scum.
Ok. I'm realizing I'm probably wrong anyway. I was thinking that ash was trying to protect MiX by creating WIFOM about who was the real vig.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #629 on: March 03, 2021, 03:17:11 pm »

Vote Count 2.4:

faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): Joth, MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): EFHW, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.


* Answers to questions asked found below:

1. When the Traitor PM went out, that player was informed who the Mafia was.

2. A Traitor in this game CAN be recruited via a Mafia Night Kill.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2021, 03:46:05 pm by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #630 on: March 03, 2021, 03:36:18 pm »

Vote: ash, I think I was already voting there, but.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #631 on: March 03, 2021, 03:46:08 pm »

Vote: ash, I think I was already voting there, but.

missed it, but you were on ash. vc is fixed.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #632 on: March 03, 2021, 03:52:37 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

Hmmm... I had been so caught up in trying to figure out what was going on with the traitor, I forgot to look back at the EOD. Yeah, I’m finding space pretty towny.

Vote: gkrieg
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #633 on: March 03, 2021, 04:54:03 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

I think this logic assumes that the mafia know the traitor, because otherwise having the two mafia on-wagon with a traitor that was already on wagon is not a ridiculous idea.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #634 on: March 03, 2021, 04:54:43 pm »

vote: EFHW
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #635 on: March 03, 2021, 04:55:21 pm »

Also faust has a history of reading me incorrectly and pushing for my misexile, as do I with incorrectly pushing his.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #636 on: March 03, 2021, 04:58:56 pm »

What did I start? A meaningless day 1 wagon?

Oh I actually thought it was a good wagon before you called it meaningless. Let’s start a meaningful one. Vote: joth

Votes joth early as kind of an after-RVS vote. Makes me lean scummier on joth.

Is it just me, or did you say you thought joth was scummy because mcmc voted for him early, and then do a full 180 and agree with me that it actually makes joth seem townier, given that I can't find evidence of mcmc bussing during d1 in any recent scumgames?

In contrast to my scumpoint allocation for faust and Dylan, I think joth gets an allocation of townpoints, because looking back at a few of mcmc's prior scum-games, he's really not one to bus D1.

Yup, agree with Space here.

PPE 1

Yes, I do a complete 180. I agree that mcmc doesn't bus early, and joth is the only person that mcmc really votes for and interacts with D1. I think that makes joth more likely to be town, which is cemented by your pointing out that mcmc doesn't usually bus D1 in his recent games.
Actually, what you do is more like a complete 360, since this post comes after:

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW.

True, I don't think joth has done other townie things even though the mcmc stuff give him town points.
So when you said you did a complete 180 you were lying? Good to know.

You have to have done a 180 to do a 360 :)
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #637 on: March 03, 2021, 04:59:17 pm »

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

Vote: ash

I mean you did claim role cop...

I really think it’s better to find the other mafia member, don’t you?

Especially interesting because ash is not really in any danger of being exiled, so why would he counterclaim, especially so late.
It was actually his first post since the claim.

Didn't realize that.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #638 on: March 03, 2021, 04:59:51 pm »

Can I be IC now?

Lol, you want to be IC from not knowing the setup? Aren't you the one that is always against using this as a townslip?
I don't think I am?

Must be mixing you up with someone else.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #639 on: March 03, 2021, 05:01:28 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

Is this your case against me? I'm the scum with mcmc that decided to stay off-wagon? It was a quick exile, you really think that the two scum didn't both end up on the mathdude wagon?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #640 on: March 03, 2021, 05:26:07 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #641 on: March 03, 2021, 05:27:59 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?

For you, gkrieg, why is a 1 in 6 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot?
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #642 on: March 03, 2021, 05:28:46 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?

For you, gkrieg, why is a 1 in 6 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot?

Lol. Ignore me. Carry on.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #643 on: March 03, 2021, 05:46:09 pm »

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Is this post a scumslip and a townslip at the same time?

There is no way for a Traitor to be recruited after game start, right?

I asked a related question in my QT a few days ago, so I assume that's why I used QT code by mistake. I thought it was part of the traitor role that if they are nk'd they get recruited instead of dying. Is that just in some games?

I asked a similar thing in my QT a few days ago, and was told that in order for the traitor to get recruited, it had to happen in the pre-game, and that they could not be recruited at night by being targeted by their actual mafia buddies.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #644 on: March 03, 2021, 06:03:36 pm »

Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?

I was initially going to make a post disagreeing with it, but then I tried to lay out my reasoning and it was flawed, so that post didn't happen.

I think there is probably cause for scum to want to encourage the mathdude wagon to build, and unfortunately newbies don't know how to act in ways that the community doesn't scumread. It's a learning curve for everyone, and I think scum could easily have been capitalising on that. I had thought that since MiX was being so infuriatingly earnestly anti-town, it was just too obvious that scum should be following whatever the not-MiX wagon was, because a town!MiX playing like that is just a gift to scum. However, it turns out that the MiX wagon wasn't a big enough competitor to mathdude for that to be useful to scum at the points in the game where you were pointing out that Ash was slowly coaxing people onto mathdude.

I'm not sure what to make of Ash's counterclaim. Honestly, I believe he's up to something that involves lying to town, but it's hard to say whether he's trying to do it in an anti-town way, because it's kind of a hallmark of town!ash play that he's try to concoct a clever scheme that relies on brazenly lying about something with good intentions because he wants to do something wacky and claim MVP. Usually I strongly disagree with such methods, because they're never exactly evidence-based. And sure, I'd probably be at least a bit tempted for a policy vote on Ash just for the lie, but equally then why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #645 on: March 03, 2021, 06:05:51 pm »

Just to be sure -- <b>Would a vigged traitor be recruited instead of dying?</b>
Is this post a scumslip and a townslip at the same time?

There is no way for a Traitor to be recruited after game start, right?

I asked a related question in my QT a few days ago, so I assume that's why I used QT code by mistake. I thought it was part of the traitor role that if they are nk'd they get recruited instead of dying. Is that just in some games?

I asked a similar thing in my QT a few days ago, and was told that in order for the traitor to get recruited, it had to happen in the pre-game, and that they could not be recruited at night by being targeted by their actual mafia buddies.

I am squashing this right now.
Space asked this question in Version 1.0 and I incorrectly answered them. The Mafia Traitor can either be recruited via pre game selection or Mafia Night Kill.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #646 on: March 03, 2021, 06:11:34 pm »

--the rest of the post is not required--

why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?

As a PR, I think I handled D1 well: there were exactly 2 wagons, one on me and one on the other person, they died instead of me, and my PR was of greater utility than theirs could ever be. The only reason math was hammered is because scum got in my way, and they paid the price. The way EoD1 would've gone is: math claims, people back off, people go for me, I redirect them to another wagon, we 1v1 me and that wagon, then we exile that wagon (even if I have to claim in the process). Saying there was a better thing for me to do is having the hindsight (and math's flip) that I couldn't have in EoD1.

With that out of the way, I'm sure we can agree that voting ash and voting me are 2 very different things? I'm claiming a PR and I have no real counterclaims, ash is executing a plan, something he said D1 that he would rather not be known for, this is much more consistent with scum!ash. Unless you think he can be Vig? If so, why?
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #647 on: March 03, 2021, 06:15:52 pm »

Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?

I was initially going to make a post disagreeing with it, but then I tried to lay out my reasoning and it was flawed, so that post didn't happen.

I think there is probably cause for scum to want to encourage the mathdude wagon to build, and unfortunately newbies don't know how to act in ways that the community doesn't scumread. It's a learning curve for everyone, and I think scum could easily have been capitalising on that. I had thought that since MiX was being so infuriatingly earnestly anti-town, it was just too obvious that scum should be following whatever the not-MiX wagon was, because a town!MiX playing like that is just a gift to scum. However, it turns out that the MiX wagon wasn't a big enough competitor to mathdude for that to be useful to scum at the points in the game where you were pointing out that Ash was slowly coaxing people onto mathdude.

I'm not sure what to make of Ash's counterclaim. Honestly, I believe he's up to something that involves lying to town, but it's hard to say whether he's trying to do it in an anti-town way, because it's kind of a hallmark of town!ash play that he's try to concoct a clever scheme that relies on brazenly lying about something with good intentions because he wants to do something wacky and claim MVP. Usually I strongly disagree with such methods, because they're never exactly evidence-based. And sure, I'd probably be at least a bit tempted for a policy vote on Ash just for the lie, but equally then why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?

Actually this bolded part's important: I wasn't trying to look scummy on purpose. Maybe when I voted math, but not before. You were the ones that made me the math alternative, not me, you have the timeline wrong, scum didn't vote on math to jump on the not-MiX wagon, they were already there...well, I guess EFHW did vote math while my wagon was growing, but no one else did.

This is important because you won't vote ash if you think his situation is comparable to mine, so please, talk more about how I play the EoD1, I assure you I was trying to be pro-town as best I could.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #648 on: March 03, 2021, 06:25:15 pm »

I am squashing this right now.
Space asked this question in Version 1.0 and I incorrectly answered them. The Mafia Traitor can either be recruited via pre game selection or Mafia Night Kill.


Wow, okay! Sorry if I stepped close to a line there! I was being really careful not to talk about v1, but it honestly hadn't occurred to me that the clarifications I'd gathered for v1 wouldn't be the same for v2, so I'd been assuming the potential traitor in this current game also couldn't be recruited. My bad :-(
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #649 on: March 03, 2021, 06:53:59 pm »

As a PR, I think I handled D1 well: there were exactly 2 wagons, one on me and one on the other person, they died instead of me, and my PR was of greater utility than theirs could ever be. The only reason math was hammered is because scum got in my way, and they paid the price. The way EoD1 would've gone is: math claims, people back off, people go for me, I redirect them to another wagon, we 1v1 me and that wagon, then we exile that wagon (even if I have to claim in the process). Saying there was a better thing for me to do is having the hindsight (and math's flip) that I couldn't have in EoD1.

It's not "having the hindsight" when I said in the post immediately following mathdude's partial claim that actually, he really needed to full-claim and we needed to give people the chance to counterclaim him. You were the one who jumped to the incorrect conclusion that he was trying to counterclaim your PR and made the traitor accusation as a panicked response. If you'd had the patience to let him claim his role, you would have seen there wasn't a reason to immediately accuse him. The deadline was not even very imminent at that point, and one of the reasons your wagon was at 5 votes was that people who didn't want to exile mathdude (e.g. Robz) were voting for you in opposition. I think there's every chance that scum would have diverted public opinion onto a VT (or other town PR?) instead of you as the mathdude wagon waned, particularly because I think scum is quite happy to keep you alive looking scummy.

With that out of the way, I'm sure we can agree that voting ash and voting me are 2 very different things? I'm claiming a PR and I have no real counterclaims, ash is executing a plan, something he said D1 that he would rather not be known for, this is much more consistent with scum!ash. Unless you think he can be Vig? If so, why?

No, as I said, I think your vig claim makes the most sense, particularly because I do think you'd be carrying exactly the sort of bias you exhibited with assuming that mathdude was going to claim vig just because you're vig, and I don't think mafia!you or traitor!you would have been quite so primed to do that.

My equating you and Ash is simply that I think both of you are doing anti-town things in the intention of doing something good for town that is simultaneously quite selfish in the way that it tends to concentrate the power and information into a small number of hands (yours or Ash's). In your case, that's lying to town about thinking mathdude was the traitor, and generally posting even more noise and half-baked theories in-thread than usual in an attempt to look less townie so you're not on scum's radar. In Ash's case, it's making a big bold role claim that's almost certainly a lie to town, but probably gives him some advantage, like surviving longer in the game and getting better PoE or something. You may well both be town, but both of those things involve misleading other townies, and other townies are generally a bit miffed about being misled, so I think it's fully reasonable to want to put down a policy vote against either of you.

I mean, sure, maybe Ash is just scum looking to make the game interesting, in which case it's undeniably pro-town to vote for him, but actually I kind of lean against that just because we really do see this kind of stuff from town!ash, nice though it would be to have a simple scum!ash case to trust in.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #650 on: March 03, 2021, 07:31:10 pm »

Remember when ash got all excited because no one was asking or expecting him to have a plan and he'd finally escaped that meta?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #651 on: March 03, 2021, 08:31:03 pm »

--the rest of the post is not required--

why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?

As a PR, I think I handled D1 well: there were exactly 2 wagons, one on me and one on the other person, they died instead of me, and my PR was of greater utility than theirs could ever be. The only reason math was hammered is because scum got in my way, and they paid the price. The way EoD1 would've gone is: math claims, people back off, people go for me, I redirect them to another wagon, we 1v1 me and that wagon, then we exile that wagon (even if I have to claim in the process). Saying there was a better thing for me to do is having the hindsight (and math's flip) that I couldn't have in EoD1.

With that out of the way, I'm sure we can agree that voting ash and voting me are 2 very different things? I'm claiming a PR and I have no real counterclaims, ash is executing a plan, something he said D1 that he would rather not be known for, this is much more consistent with scum!ash. Unless you think he can be Vig? If so, why?

Your description of your D1 reminds of when flat-Earthers explain to me why the Earth is flat.  They just so earnestly believe it.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #652 on: March 03, 2021, 08:32:29 pm »

Edit after posting:

I wanted to say: It is MiX's ability to lie as well as he tells the truth that makes him a very good mafia player.  Because even when he is telling the truth, it so clearly sounds like lies.

This is a comment on MiX in general, not about his current alignment.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #653 on: March 03, 2021, 08:34:00 pm »

The off-wagon argument raised by faust is a good one.  We have gotten a bit off track with traditional forms of analysis this D2.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #654 on: March 03, 2021, 08:36:40 pm »

faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): Joth, MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): EFHW, gkrieg

Copied the latest VC here for reference.

The way I see it, the breakdowns we are discussing here are:

1. faust vs. Space vs. Gkrieg
2. Dylan vs. WCD vs. EFHW

Everyone else is just off the table D2 for me for various reasons.  I'll post on these in a bit.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #655 on: March 03, 2021, 08:40:51 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?

I’m not fully convinced, but I’m investing a bit of faith in faust’s “trust me” that we shouldn’t exile Ash today.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #656 on: March 03, 2021, 09:00:23 pm »

Edit after posting:

I wanted to say: It is MiX's ability to lie as well as he tells the truth that makes him a very good mafia player.  Because even when he is telling the truth, it so clearly sounds like lies.

This is a comment on MiX in general, not about his current alignment.

Thank you, I've worked very hard to make my lies as believable as possible. It just turns out I'm very hard to believe in general.

--the rest of the post is not required--

why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?

As a PR, I think I handled D1 well: there were exactly 2 wagons, one on me and one on the other person, they died instead of me, and my PR was of greater utility than theirs could ever be. The only reason math was hammered is because scum got in my way, and they paid the price. The way EoD1 would've gone is: math claims, people back off, people go for me, I redirect them to another wagon, we 1v1 me and that wagon, then we exile that wagon (even if I have to claim in the process). Saying there was a better thing for me to do is having the hindsight (and math's flip) that I couldn't have in EoD1.

With that out of the way, I'm sure we can agree that voting ash and voting me are 2 very different things? I'm claiming a PR and I have no real counterclaims, ash is executing a plan, something he said D1 that he would rather not be known for, this is much more consistent with scum!ash. Unless you think he can be Vig? If so, why?

Your description of your D1 reminds of when flat-Earthers explain to me why the Earth is flat.  They just so earnestly believe it.

That's adorable. Just like those arguments, mafia doesn't ground itself on logic, so the comparison's accurate. It's not about whether I was right in how I should've played EoD1, it's about what I believe is right, that lets you get a read on me.

I guess the conclusion here is: policy votes are bad, ash's scum and that's why I'm voting him. But I just want to convince Space to vote ash, so I'll probably say anything to get what I want at this point.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #657 on: March 03, 2021, 09:52:41 pm »

Also faust has a history of reading me incorrectly and pushing for my misexile, as do I with incorrectly pushing his.

I know you think you read me well, but we have the same history. Why did you vote for me?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #658 on: March 03, 2021, 11:00:14 pm »

Ash seems to think ignoring the case on him will make it go away. Please help me prove him wrong.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #659 on: March 04, 2021, 12:47:10 am »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

I think this logic assumes that the mafia know the traitor, because otherwise having the two mafia on-wagon with a traitor that was already on wagon is not a ridiculous idea.
Yes it is.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #660 on: March 04, 2021, 12:47:32 am »

Also faust has a history of reading me incorrectly and pushing for my misexile, as do I with incorrectly pushing his.
Lol how about you back this up with evidence?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #661 on: March 04, 2021, 12:48:54 am »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

Is this your case against me? I'm the scum with mcmc that decided to stay off-wagon? It was a quick exile, you really think that the two scum didn't both end up on the mathdude wagon?
This is ridiculous. I didn't just "happen" to be a quick exile. Scum made it a quick exile. The dropped the hammer; they had full control.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #662 on: March 04, 2021, 12:49:29 am »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?
I think ash and MiX are both town.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #663 on: March 04, 2021, 12:53:15 am »

--the rest of the post is not required--

why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?

As a PR, I think I handled D1 well: there were exactly 2 wagons, one on me and one on the other person, they died instead of me, and my PR was of greater utility than theirs could ever be. The only reason math was hammered is because scum got in my way, and they paid the price. The way EoD1 would've gone is: math claims, people back off, people go for me, I redirect them to another wagon, we 1v1 me and that wagon, then we exile that wagon (even if I have to claim in the process). Saying there was a better thing for me to do is having the hindsight (and math's flip) that I couldn't have in EoD1.

With that out of the way, I'm sure we can agree that voting ash and voting me are 2 very different things? I'm claiming a PR and I have no real counterclaims, ash is executing a plan, something he said D1 that he would rather not be known for, this is much more consistent with scum!ash. Unless you think he can be Vig? If so, why?

Your description of your D1 reminds of when flat-Earthers explain to me why the Earth is flat.  They just so earnestly believe it.
I'm keeping this post for you post-game explanation of why counterclaiming was a good idea.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #664 on: March 04, 2021, 03:06:21 am »

Vote Count 2.5:

faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): Joth, MiX
gkrieg (2): faust, WestCoastDidds
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): gkrieg
Not Voting (1): EFHW


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #665 on: March 04, 2021, 06:03:38 am »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?

I’m not fully convinced, but I’m investing a bit of faith in faust’s “trust me” that we shouldn’t exile Ash today.
Oh I just didn't want to explain my thinking to scum so they would be confused. Now others have explained what it is the ash could have done, so there is no longer any benefit to keeping quiet. Your post reads as though you believe I was claiming some sort of result on ash; that was not the intention.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #666 on: March 04, 2021, 08:37:53 am »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #667 on: March 04, 2021, 08:42:13 am »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.
So you are arguing for a policy vote? I refuse to reward and normalize policy votes.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #668 on: March 04, 2021, 08:45:56 am »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.
So you are arguing for a policy vote? I refuse to reward and normalize policy votes.

No. I think one of them is scum (it’s ash). That is based on a prior that town doesn’t lie. If that prior turns out to be wrong because some town player is blatantly playing against their wincon by lying, that will be a bummer but it will be their fault not mine and hopefully they will learn from it on future games.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #669 on: March 04, 2021, 08:46:39 am »

I should say, based in part on that prior. It’s also based on my reads— the case I made earlier and his behavior today.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #670 on: March 04, 2021, 08:50:36 am »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

For you, faust, why is a 1 in 3 shot better than a 1 in 2 shot? For WCD, why is a 1 in 2 based on wagon analysis better than a 1 in 2 based on conflicting claims?

I’m not fully convinced, but I’m investing a bit of faith in faust’s “trust me” that we shouldn’t exile Ash today.
Oh I just didn't want to explain my thinking to scum so they would be confused. Now others have explained what it is the ash could have done, so there is no longer any benefit to keeping quiet. Your post reads as though you believe I was claiming some sort of result on ash; that was not the intention.

Got it!

So, to Josh’s point, if Ash is town what’s with all the claiming? How does this make him town?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #671 on: March 04, 2021, 08:50:45 am »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.
So you are arguing for a policy vote? I refuse to reward and normalize policy votes.

No. I think one of them is scum (it’s ash). That is based on a prior that town doesn’t lie. If that prior turns out to be wrong because some town player is blatantly playing against their wincon by lying, that will be a bummer but it will be their fault not mine and hopefully they will learn from it on future games.
I think what you are describing is a policy vote. Otherwise, please let me know how you define policy voting, and how what you are doing differs from that.

I should say, based in part on that prior. It’s also based on my reads— the case I made earlier and his behavior today.
That's all well and fine and you are free to argue that ash is scum, just please don't mix it with arguments that we should exile someone because they're playing the game wrong.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #672 on: March 04, 2021, 08:51:03 am »

Why does ash get special treatment?

When MiX claimed you drew the conclusion that either he was scum or that he was the vig. You said if he doesn’t get counterclaimed he’s IC.

Ash counterclaimed and suddenly you decided that makes him town. Why?

I guess what I’ve been trying to say is, the burden of proof is on you, faust. You’re the one making an extraordinary claim. I’m making the default claim: that when a PR is claimed and counterclaimed, at least one claimant is scum. Explain to me why we should deviate from that default assumption. If you can, I’ll switch my vote to gkreig.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #673 on: March 04, 2021, 08:52:20 am »

So, to Josh’s point, if Ash is town what’s with all the claiming? How does this make him town?
It doesn't; it makes him ash. Honestly the whole thing is NAI to me. I had a slight townread on ash before that and that hasn't gone away, though if some scum decided it would be a good idea to throw all scum votes behind a D1 misexile it would probably be ash.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #674 on: March 04, 2021, 08:53:47 am »

Why does ash get special treatment?

When MiX claimed you drew the conclusion that either he was scum or that he was the vig. You said if he doesn’t get counterclaimed he’s IC.

Ash counterclaimed and suddenly you decided that makes him town. Why?
You know ash's meta. Don't pretend otherwise. He has a history of lying as town. MiX does not. Most people do not, which is why most of the time you can believe what people say.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #675 on: March 04, 2021, 08:55:15 am »

Why does ash get special treatment?

When MiX claimed you drew the conclusion that either he was scum or that he was the vig. You said if he doesn’t get counterclaimed he’s IC.

Ash counterclaimed and suddenly you decided that makes him town. Why?
You know ash's meta. Don't pretend otherwise. He has a history of lying as town. MiX does not. Most people do not, which is why most of the time you can believe what people say.

^^^the perfect argument for policy votes.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #676 on: March 04, 2021, 08:56:46 am »

Also not sure why you are so fixated on me. At least two people have agreed with me that ash might well be counterclaiming as town. You are in fact in the minority as far as I can tell, so it#s you who's going to have to do the convincing if you want to get ash exiled.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #677 on: March 04, 2021, 09:03:28 am »

You’re the ringleader.

Anyway I have been trying to convince people to join my wagon. I made a case and I thought it was good. It’s just nobody will listen to me because they think ash is a special magic elf who can’t be scum.

I guess I might as well claim vig and grab IC status then give up on winning the game.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #678 on: March 04, 2021, 09:07:25 am »

Anyway I have been trying to convince people to join my wagon. I made a case and I thought it was good. It’s just nobody will listen to me because they think ash is a special magic elf who can’t be scum.

And I have already responded to your case:
Also, I m ow it’s not as flashy as claims and counterclaims, but I did the work and re-read t
Yesterday and came up with a fairly good case on ash. Isn’t anyone going to comment on it?
I wasn't impressed. But here are some comments. The case seems to consist of 2 pieces:

- ash pushed mathdude because he knew that he was a PR
- ash put exactly one scum in his "would exile" list.

With regards to the first point: if scum picked out a PR it makes way more sense for them to just NK that player rather than tell everyone about it and potentially risk protection. This also ignores that mcmc was on the mathdude wagon and that mcmc's partner is way more likely to be off-wagon.
Second part is fair enough but one scum in three players is also just the expected value. It is some indication but not a very compelling case. Especially since unless mafia recruited scum!ash knew at most one other scum anyways.
I don't know what else you want from me. Here I said why I am not convinced that ash is scum. it has nothing to do with his elven heritage.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #679 on: March 04, 2021, 09:09:05 am »

You know what?

vote: gkrieg

He's my pick for ash's partner anyway. And then we can resume this lovely conversation tomorrow. Or not.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #680 on: March 04, 2021, 09:12:50 am »

I don't think faust and ash are the scum team, but it's pretty clear to me that if faust and ash were the scum team they could pretty much do whatever they want and get away with it and that seems like a problem.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #681 on: March 04, 2021, 10:45:50 am »

But I just want to convince Space to vote ash, so I'll probably say anything to get what I want at this point.

Do you have any idea how insulting that is to me?

You've decided what you want me to do, and you're stating a willingness to lie and manipulate to get your way, without respecting my own autonomy.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #682 on: March 04, 2021, 10:59:02 am »

But I just want to convince Space to vote ash, so I'll probably say anything to get what I want at this point.

Do you have any idea how insulting that is to me?

You've decided what you want me to do, and you're stating a willingness to lie and manipulate to get your way, without respecting my own autonomy.

Yes, which is why I won't try anymore, if I'm this desperate then you really shouldn't listen to me.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #683 on: March 04, 2021, 12:07:39 pm »

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?

This was, in retrospect, a bad case. I also think some people noticed it was a sort of bad case at the time. But what's interesting is it's a strategically timed case. Right as the mathdude wagon was sputtering out, ash comes in with something "concrete" to revv it back to life. Case in point, it totally worked on me:

I wanted to share that the specific part of mathdude's post that triggered my suspicion was what read to me as their assumption they would be alive on Day 2 to partake in activities.

You know who knows they will definitely not die at night?
Ok, this I find compelling.
Let's give vote: mathdude a try.

It was a really bad case because there was the possibility of vig, so scum couldn't be sure of surviving the night. I feel like ash has made this argument before.

Quote
Reading further on, I can 't shake the feeling that ashersky was very much the driver of the mathdude wagon and that he started driving it in earnest after THE POST, which is also where mathdude PR-slipped.

I'm going with vote: ashersky

It's not the most extensive case, but the content and timing of his posts around the mathdude wagon paint a picture of a strong player pushing a wagon hard but not looking like he was pushing it too hard. And that possible traitor call is just icing (though if Ash flips traitor, well, nothing I saw in the reread rules out gkrieg as partner). There's also this soft defense:

gkrieg's absence is unfortunate, but I do think that makes him more likely to be town.  Does mafia!gkrieg know that he can skate by with a no-show Day 1?  Yeah, he does.  Does he actually do that?  I highly doubt it.  That's just from my experience though.
I can see a possible partner vibe in this. But how does your case connect to gkrieg otherwise? You didn't mention him until this, but it sounds like you see a connection.

I'm trying to think of the scum narrative for ash's counterclaim. mcmc's death made him desperate? The counterclaim was not at all convincing. He says "I'll bite", as though choosing to claim is disconnected from actually being the role. Then he doesn't want to exile MiX. A true vig would be all over that exile in this situation, and scum!ashersky would try to be convincing.

There isn't much of a town narrative for ash's behavior, either. I'm with joth on exiling liars. Lying is usually a sign of scum. It's super duper anti-town from town. vote: ashersky
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #684 on: March 04, 2021, 12:18:38 pm »

--the rest of the post is not required--

why not policy-vote MiX for the way he handled the EoD1?

As a PR, I think I handled D1 well: there were exactly 2 wagons, one on me and one on the other person, they died instead of me, and my PR was of greater utility than theirs could ever be. The only reason math was hammered is because scum got in my way, and they paid the price. The way EoD1 would've gone is: math claims, people back off, people go for me, I redirect them to another wagon, we 1v1 me and that wagon, then we exile that wagon (even if I have to claim in the process). Saying there was a better thing for me to do is having the hindsight (and math's flip) that I couldn't have in EoD1.

With that out of the way, I'm sure we can agree that voting ash and voting me are 2 very different things? I'm claiming a PR and I have no real counterclaims, ash is executing a plan, something he said D1 that he would rather not be known for, this is much more consistent with scum!ash. Unless you think he can be Vig? If so, why?

I would argue that roleblocker is higher utility than vig, but still, that's beside the point.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #685 on: March 04, 2021, 12:21:21 pm »

faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): Joth, MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): EFHW, gkrieg

Copied the latest VC here for reference.

The way I see it, the breakdowns we are discussing here are:

1. faust vs. Space vs. Gkrieg
2. Dylan vs. WCD vs. EFHW

Everyone else is just off the table D2 for me for various reasons.  I'll post on these in a bit.

Is this because you think that it is unlikely that scum are going at each other right now?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #686 on: March 04, 2021, 12:40:31 pm »

Also faust has a history of reading me incorrectly and pushing for my misexile, as do I with incorrectly pushing his.

I know you think you read me well, but we have the same history. Why did you vote for me?

I'm pretty sure I was already voting for you but it didn't appear in the vote count, so I thought that was the easier way to correct the vote count.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #687 on: March 04, 2021, 12:41:32 pm »

Also faust has a history of reading me incorrectly and pushing for my misexile, as do I with incorrectly pushing his.
Lol how about you back this up with evidence?

Don't have time to pull that together right now.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #688 on: March 04, 2021, 12:42:58 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

Is this your case against me? I'm the scum with mcmc that decided to stay off-wagon? It was a quick exile, you really think that the two scum didn't both end up on the mathdude wagon?
This is ridiculous. I didn't just "happen" to be a quick exile. Scum made it a quick exile. The dropped the hammer; they had full control.

Mcmcsalot had full control. The others would've just been stuck.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #689 on: March 04, 2021, 12:44:08 pm »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.

Town lying has won us the game multiple times. When done correctly, it can be useful.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #690 on: March 04, 2021, 12:46:25 pm »

You’re the ringleader.

Anyway I have been trying to convince people to join my wagon. I made a case and I thought it was good. It’s just nobody will listen to me because they think ash is a special magic elf who can’t be scum.

I guess I might as well claim vig and grab IC status then give up on winning the game.

If you look at MiX's play, it seems obvious to me that he thought he was playing the role of a vig correctly.

If you look at ash, his ploy of lying town fits him, and he has been townie so far.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #691 on: March 04, 2021, 12:47:31 pm »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.

Town lying has won us the game multiple times. When done correctly, it can be useful.

No! It loses us the game much more often.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #692 on: March 04, 2021, 12:47:52 pm »

You know what?

vote: gkrieg

He's my pick for ash's partner anyway. And then we can resume this lovely conversation tomorrow. Or not.

What do you mean ash's partner? There is 1 scum left and 1 traitor. Do you think that I know that ash is scum and am the traitor, ash is the traitor and knows I'm scum, or that scum decided to recruit the traitor?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #693 on: March 04, 2021, 12:49:34 pm »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.

Town lying has won us the game multiple times. When done correctly, it can be useful.

No! It loses us the game much more often.

I'm not convinced it does.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #694 on: March 04, 2021, 12:51:44 pm »

The only way ash and MiX could both be town is if one is lying town. I refuse to reward or normalize town lying. I’m legitimately shocked that this is a controversial opinion.

Town lying has won us the game multiple times. When done correctly, it can be useful.

No! It loses us the game much more often.

I'm not convinced it does.

Do either of you have evidence to back this up?

The way I see it, in every game, town PRs lie to look like VTs and we accept that as reasonable town lying. But I don't think it's fundamentally different from what ash is doing right now, we simply can distinguish between pro-town play and anti-town play, and ash's play right now is anti-town. It's also scummy. It also comes from scum. There are all 3 independent facts (well, the third one might not be, but you know).
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #695 on: March 04, 2021, 12:52:37 pm »

It feels like Didds and Dylan are flying well below the radar.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #696 on: March 04, 2021, 12:57:30 pm »

You know what?

vote: gkrieg

He's my pick for ash's partner anyway. And then we can resume this lovely conversation tomorrow. Or not.

What do you mean ash's partner? There is 1 scum left and 1 traitor. Do you think that I know that ash is scum and am the traitor, ash is the traitor and knows I'm scum, or that scum decided to recruit the traitor?

Interesting. gkrieg seems to know for a fact that there's a traitor and scum didn't choose the option to recruit. scumslip!

Also, if there is a traitor my theory is that it's ash and he tried to signal it to you D1, as I said above.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #697 on: March 04, 2021, 12:57:48 pm »

It feels like Didds and Dylan are flying well below the radar.

I am much more present than Dylan!

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #698 on: March 04, 2021, 01:00:17 pm »

You know what?

vote: gkrieg

He's my pick for ash's partner anyway. And then we can resume this lovely conversation tomorrow. Or not.

What do you mean ash's partner? There is 1 scum left and 1 traitor. Do you think that I know that ash is scum and am the traitor, ash is the traitor and knows I'm scum, or that scum decided to recruit the traitor?

Interesting. gkrieg seems to know for a fact that there's a traitor and scum didn't choose the option to recruit. scumslip!

Also, if there is a traitor my theory is that it's ash and he tried to signal it to you D1, as I said above.

So you think either ash's the traitor and gkrieg is scum, or that they're both scum? Why not flip gkrieg first: if he flips traitor, then ash's confirmed town, right?

It feels like Didds and Dylan are flying well below the radar.

I am much more present than Dylan!

Yes, but you're Didds, you fly lower than most people by default.

I kinda wanna hear more from Dylan, we probably need his vote to break the stalemate that is this day.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #699 on: March 04, 2021, 01:02:15 pm »

You know what?

vote: gkrieg

He's my pick for ash's partner anyway. And then we can resume this lovely conversation tomorrow. Or not.

What do you mean ash's partner? There is 1 scum left and 1 traitor. Do you think that I know that ash is scum and am the traitor, ash is the traitor and knows I'm scum, or that scum decided to recruit the traitor?

Interesting. gkrieg seems to know for a fact that there's a traitor and scum didn't choose the option to recruit. scumslip!

Also, if there is a traitor my theory is that it's ash and he tried to signal it to you D1, as I said above.

Did you read the entire sentence I wrote? The third option is literally the option that scum chose to recruit the traitor.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #700 on: March 04, 2021, 01:03:01 pm »

It feels like Didds and Dylan are flying well below the radar.

I am much more present than Dylan!

Agreed, but I don't see many people having opinions about you or asking you questions, and I'm not really sure what your reads are.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #701 on: March 04, 2021, 01:19:32 pm »

True enough.

Most of the day I’ve been trying to figure out what/why is going on with Ash, but I’ve decided to give up on that.

For me, MiX, Joth, and Space are the most town, followed closely by faust.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #702 on: March 04, 2021, 01:58:51 pm »

Really sorry about the low activity today. This week has been a bit higher pressure with work than normal and I have a pretty important deadline Monday, so I haven't had time to do anything more than just skim and try to keep up. I'll try to make sense of the ash mix thing when I get off work this evening.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #703 on: March 04, 2021, 02:50:31 pm »

Vote Count 2.6:

gkrieg (3): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth
faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): MiX, EFHW
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): gkrieg
Not Voting (0):


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #704 on: March 04, 2021, 04:05:48 pm »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #705 on: March 04, 2021, 04:19:05 pm »


Of those three, Ash
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #706 on: March 04, 2021, 07:29:49 pm »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.

You know I'd go to any wagon to ensure an exile by day's end.  Or that I'd Thor any E-1 presented to me.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #707 on: March 04, 2021, 07:42:09 pm »

Interesting. gkrieg seems to know for a fact that there's a traitor and scum didn't choose the option to recruit. scumslip!

I don't understand these arguments being made about knowing the traitor exists in this setup.  I have seen multiple posts arguing that knowing of the existence of a traitor or not is somehow indicative of alignment.

In the game setup post, it says there is a traitor.  That means every player should know this.  I assume, based on the all town gets VT PMs rule, that one player received a traitor PM in "pre-game."

AFTER a traitor was assigned, but before anything else happens, the mafia have the option to recruit said traitor, who exists.  The "power" name says "Recruit Traitor as Mafia Goon" so I assume the QT is replaced or changed to say Goon instead of Traitor.  Only the three of them can know this, if it even happened.

In the meantime, the rest of town don't know.  It is completely and utterly understandable that any town player would just continue to use "traitor" as the moniker for the third, not-originally-assigned-to-the-mafia-QT player.

To me, the recruited traitor is just that, a recruited traitor, and as such, still "the traitor" in my mind.  It's easier than thinking "I wonder if faust is one of the two original mafia players from pre-game or if they were the traitor and/or the recruited traitor."  Man, that's a long and ridiculous way to have to type things out just to avoid random slip arguments.

Also, isn't it possible mcmc was recruited traitor who then got the JOAT power?  The setup says traitors can get powers if recruited.  So then the remaining two mafia WOULD be the original two in their QT.  So the traitor argument just seems like a huge waste of time at best and a misdirect at worst absent evidence that it matters.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #708 on: March 04, 2021, 07:44:55 pm »

faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): Joth, MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): EFHW, gkrieg

Copied the latest VC here for reference.

The way I see it, the breakdowns we are discussing here are:

1. faust vs. Space vs. Gkrieg
2. Dylan vs. WCD vs. EFHW

Everyone else is just off the table D2 for me for various reasons.  I'll post on these in a bit.

Is this because you think that it is unlikely that scum are going at each other right now?

I'm honestly not sure what mafia is doing here.

These two grouping just seem like the way to split the players I think are worth exiling today.  Group #1 are "active" and "contributing" as compared to group #2, and could be the "active mafia pushing town in a certain direction" archetype.  Group #2 would have the "sailing along while town destroys itself" archetype in it.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #709 on: March 04, 2021, 07:45:54 pm »

Also, apologies to all for my lack of activity.  On top of a busy schedule, I had to take my dog to the vet and he's currently in ICU.  We go every day to see him and talk to the doctor about chances of survival and courses of action to take.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #710 on: March 04, 2021, 09:17:41 pm »

Oh, Ash! I’m so sorry about your dog. That is awful and you must be a wreck. All good thoughts for you and yours.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #711 on: March 04, 2021, 09:55:35 pm »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.

I would vote gkrieg.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #712 on: March 05, 2021, 12:33:50 am »

Mobile posting before bed. First,

Unvote

My exile pool for today is probably gkrieg, EFHW, Didds, and Ash, in no order. I tend to agree with joth that it’s probably best to not reward lying town, but I agree with Faust that Ash is particularly likely to do it as town, though I’m not sure it actually makes him town here. There’s probably some value to shooting outside that pair today, so I would probably vote gkrieg right now but that would be e-1 and Ash isn’t on that wagon, so the hammer would follow.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #713 on: March 05, 2021, 01:02:22 am »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.
I would not vote for myself! Surprising twist of events, I know.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #714 on: March 05, 2021, 06:09:23 am »

Update: I will be LA I think at least the rest of the weekend.  Our dog passed away, sadly.  I'll be handling arrangements and such.

unvote

If I can get on before the deadline, I'll try, but don't expect me.  Sorry I'm not so helpful from now until day's end.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #715 on: March 05, 2021, 08:27:17 am »

I’m so sorry, Ashersky. There’s nothing not awful about losing a friend. Safe travels.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #716 on: March 05, 2021, 08:30:19 am »

After reading some more of the talk today, I’m feeling better about voting for gkrieg and better about not voting for ashes. So, new answer Joth... I don’t think I’d switch to either of the other choices.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #717 on: March 05, 2021, 02:57:57 pm »

Holy lack of content, Batman! What are y’all up to?

Deadline is tomorrow evening. Maybe we should, uhm, decide?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #718 on: March 05, 2021, 03:01:33 pm »

Holy lack of content, Batman! What are y’all up to?

Deadline is tomorrow evening. Maybe we should, uhm, decide?

Hi Didds.

I still prefer Ash.

I'll take over ash's hammering business for the rest of today.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #719 on: March 05, 2021, 04:37:58 pm »

I will vote ash out of self-preservation
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #720 on: March 05, 2021, 04:39:24 pm »

faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
Ashersky (2): Joth, MiX
gkrieg (1): faust
MiX (1): Dylan32
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): EFHW, gkrieg

Copied the latest VC here for reference.

The way I see it, the breakdowns we are discussing here are:

1. faust vs. Space vs. Gkrieg
2. Dylan vs. WCD vs. EFHW

Everyone else is just off the table D2 for me for various reasons.  I'll post on these in a bit.

Is this because you think that it is unlikely that scum are going at each other right now?

I'm honestly not sure what mafia is doing here.

These two grouping just seem like the way to split the players I think are worth exiling today.  Group #1 are "active" and "contributing" as compared to group #2, and could be the "active mafia pushing town in a certain direction" archetype.  Group #2 would have the "sailing along while town destroys itself" archetype in it.

I would guess that scum are probably in the second group, judging on how I think this day is going.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #721 on: March 05, 2021, 04:40:02 pm »

Update: I will be LA I think at least the rest of the weekend.  Our dog passed away, sadly.  I'll be handling arrangements and such.

unvote

If I can get on before the deadline, I'll try, but don't expect me.  Sorry I'm not so helpful from now until day's end.

Super sorry to hear that. That really sucks.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #722 on: March 05, 2021, 04:41:03 pm »

After reading some more of the talk today, I’m feeling better about voting for gkrieg and better about not voting for ashes. So, new answer Joth... I don’t think I’d switch to either of the other choices.

What swayed you toward voting for me?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #723 on: March 05, 2021, 04:41:57 pm »

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #724 on: March 05, 2021, 04:44:21 pm »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.

I think this post is subtly making people decide to exile only from these three people, which makes me think ash and faust are town with me and that scum is trying to get town to consolidate onto use three. Especially with how people seem to be content on only exiling out of us three.

PPE
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #725 on: March 05, 2021, 04:44:56 pm »

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.

Which breakdown?
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #726 on: March 05, 2021, 04:48:12 pm »

unvote

I'm not getting scummy EFHW vibes anymore. I think faust and Space are also probably town, as is MiX. I think ash was townie before the claim, and the claim is well within town!ash's wheelhouse.

I would bet scum is within Didds-joth-Dylan.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #727 on: March 05, 2021, 04:55:50 pm »

Our dog passed away, sadly.  I'll be handling arrangements and such.

Really sorry to hear that :-(
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #728 on: March 05, 2021, 04:58:04 pm »

Vote Count 2.7:

gkrieg (3): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth
Ashersky (2): MiX, EFHW
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, Ashersky, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to Exile.
Day 2 ends Saturday, March 6th at 5:55pm Forum Time. That is in just over 24 hours!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #729 on: March 05, 2021, 05:03:51 pm »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.

I definitely scumread faust a bit, but I don't really have any particular scumread on the other two right now. I agree that ash reads as scummy, but no more so that town!ash often does, so if we're policy-voting for bad town play, I'd still prefer MiX first. That said, I'll commit some re-read time to gkrieg and ash just in case there's anything I haven't picked up yet. I stepped away from the game for the past 24 hours or so because my headspace hasn't been great, and having unpleasant social interaction in here on top of no social interaction at all irl wasn't really helping anything, however much I've missed some of you :-(
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #730 on: March 05, 2021, 05:47:40 pm »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.

I definitely scumread faust a bit, but I don't really have any particular scumread on the other two right now. I agree that ash reads as scummy, but no more so that town!ash often does, so if we're policy-voting for bad town play, I'd still prefer MiX first. That said, I'll commit some re-read time to gkrieg and ash just in case there's anything I haven't picked up yet. I stepped away from the game for the past 24 hours or so because my headspace hasn't been great, and having unpleasant social interaction in here on top of no social interaction at all irl wasn't really helping anything, however much I've missed some of you :-(

No one's policy voting! Why do you think ash only has 2 votes? I think scum!ash does this play way more than town!ash, and I see him as the only alive person that has a goal beyond finding scum.

I'm kinda hoping I die so the thread can heal back to a positive state. Yeah...think what you will about that.

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.

This post is scummier than either of those things. Only scum explains a scumread on gkrieg like that, I feel.

Me saying this is actually so I don't feel bad about the eventual hammering of gkrieg, so take it with a grain of salt after I flip :P
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #731 on: March 05, 2021, 10:52:24 pm »

I don’t want to vote for MiX, space, or Joth.

I’m voting for gkrieg which seems okay based on the idea that one baddie was likely off wagon.

Vote Count 1.7:

mathdude (7): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW, MiX, MCMC
MiX (5): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnenome, Robz888
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it took 7 to Exile.
Night 1 starts now and ends Saturday, February 27th at 3:12pm Forum Time.
Night actions are due in 36 hours.


THREAD LOCKED!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #732 on: March 05, 2021, 10:54:41 pm »

Space, I hope you’re in a better head space. I’m sorry I haven’t been if more help. This remote teaching thing is way more exhausting than I’d have ever guessed.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #733 on: March 06, 2021, 08:30:24 am »

question for anyone on gkrieg, ash, or faust. If you had to leave your wagon for one of the others, which one would you choose?

I'd choose to go back to ash.

I definitely scumread faust a bit, but I don't really have any particular scumread on the other two right now. I agree that ash reads as scummy, but no more so that town!ash often does, so if we're policy-voting for bad town play, I'd still prefer MiX first. That said, I'll commit some re-read time to gkrieg and ash just in case there's anything I haven't picked up yet. I stepped away from the game for the past 24 hours or so because my headspace hasn't been great, and having unpleasant social interaction in here on top of no social interaction at all irl wasn't really helping anything, however much I've missed some of you :-(

No one's policy voting! Why do you think ash only has 2 votes? I think scum!ash does this play way more than town!ash, and I see him as the only alive person that has a goal beyond finding scum.

I'm kinda hoping I die so the thread can heal back to a positive state. Yeah...think what you will about that.

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.

This post is scummier than either of those things. Only scum explains a scumread on gkrieg like that, I feel.

Me saying this is actually so I don't feel bad about the eventual hammering of gkrieg, so take it with a grain of salt after I flip :P

That wasn't an explanation of my willingness to vote. It was a reaction to his post.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #734 on: March 06, 2021, 09:59:28 am »

I am out and about house hunting today and may not be back on until like right before deadline. Just FYI.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #735 on: March 06, 2021, 12:35:10 pm »

I am out and about house hunting today and may not be back on until like right before deadline. Just FYI.

So exciting!!!!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #736 on: March 06, 2021, 01:20:22 pm »

We need an exile in the next like 5 hours. MiX, EFHW, you can make that happen.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #737 on: March 06, 2021, 01:25:39 pm »

We need an exile in the next like 5 hours. MiX, EFHW, you can make that happen.

I'm on hammering duty, someone else E-1 gkrieg.

Also, I'm assuming he's not a PR, cause he would've claimed by now, right?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #738 on: March 06, 2021, 01:36:32 pm »

vote: gkrieg
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #739 on: March 06, 2021, 01:37:31 pm »

We need an exile in the next like 5 hours. MiX, EFHW, you can make that happen.

I'm on hammering duty, someone else E-1 gkrieg.

Also, I'm assuming he's not a PR, cause he would've claimed by now, right?
It's certainly does not hurt to wait a bit and see whether he wants to claim.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #740 on: March 06, 2021, 01:38:19 pm »

Intent to hammer

I'm gonna wait at least half an hour, does anyone want me to wait more?
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #741 on: March 06, 2021, 01:44:36 pm »

Why are you making weird arbitrary deadlines? Just wait until gkrieg shows up, or you have to go to bed, or the Day ends, whichever happens first.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #742 on: March 06, 2021, 01:47:42 pm »

Why are you making weird arbitrary deadlines? Just wait until gkrieg shows up, or you have to go to bed, or the Day ends, whichever happens first.

The day ends in 2 hours, right? If I wait until gkrieg shows up, he might not, so I miss the hammer. I don't have to leave before the day ends, so if I wait for that, I miss the hammer. If I wait for the Day to end, I might wait too long and show up late, so I miss the hammer.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #743 on: March 06, 2021, 02:04:35 pm »

Why are you making weird arbitrary deadlines? Just wait until gkrieg shows up, or you have to go to bed, or the Day ends, whichever happens first.

The day ends in 2 hours, right? If I wait until gkrieg shows up, he might not, so I miss the hammer. I don't have to leave before the day ends, so if I wait for that, I miss the hammer. If I wait for the Day to end, I might wait too long and show up late, so I miss the hammer.

I think there's still like 4-5 hours, not 2.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #744 on: March 06, 2021, 02:12:21 pm »

Why are you making weird arbitrary deadlines? Just wait until gkrieg shows up, or you have to go to bed, or the Day ends, whichever happens first.

The day ends in 2 hours, right? If I wait until gkrieg shows up, he might not, so I miss the hammer. I don't have to leave before the day ends, so if I wait for that, I miss the hammer. If I wait for the Day to end, I might wait too long and show up late, so I miss the hammer.

I think there's still like 4-5 hours, not 2.

Oh, you're right. Ok then I can wait longer.

I presume you're busy for anything except simple explanations?
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #745 on: March 06, 2021, 04:09:25 pm »

I'm part way through a gkrieg re-read, so it would be good to have time to finish that. Started it several hours ago but then got distracted by friends playing online Hanabi...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #746 on: March 06, 2021, 04:28:32 pm »

I think deadline is in an hour and a half.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #747 on: March 06, 2021, 04:36:16 pm »

I'm part way through a gkrieg re-read, so it would be good to have time to finish that. Started it several hours ago but then got distracted by friends playing online Hanabi...
At this point I feel like we're goin to exile gkrieg or noone, I am unsure how much good a gkrieg reread will do.

Maybe there's more people active than it looks... but I'm going to leave now, so my vote will stay.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #748 on: March 06, 2021, 04:45:40 pm »

Checking in...

Nothing for me to do, yeah? Cool. Happy weekend, everyone!!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #749 on: March 06, 2021, 04:54:19 pm »

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.

Which breakdown?

Is EFHW talking here about Ashersky's breakdown into two groups, or did Joth really post something like that? As far as I can see, Joth has absolutely been tunnelling Ash all day, and is now voting gkrieg only because he things gkrieg is likely to be scumbuddies of one kind or another with Ash.

Is there a general gkrieg-supporting-Ash vibe that both Joth and EFHW are picking up on here? I mean, I think gkrieg is one of several players expressing non-surprise at Ash's counterclaim as a possible town play, but I don't see what singles him out. On the other hand, I see faust pushing the one-scum-off-wagon argument to put pressure on one of me, Didds and gkrieg beingscum, a nd that's something I think really does feel scummy because of the circumstances around the EoD1 wagons.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #750 on: March 06, 2021, 05:01:39 pm »

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.

Which breakdown?

Is EFHW talking here about Ashersky's breakdown into two groups, or did Joth really post something like that? As far as I can see, Joth has absolutely been tunnelling Ash all day, and is now voting gkrieg only because he things gkrieg is likely to be scumbuddies of one kind or another with Ash.

Is there a general gkrieg-supporting-Ash vibe that both Joth and EFHW are picking up on here? I mean, I think gkrieg is one of several players expressing non-surprise at Ash's counterclaim as a possible town play, but I don't see what singles him out. On the other hand, I see faust pushing the one-scum-off-wagon argument to put pressure on one of me, Didds and gkrieg being scum, a nd that's something I think really does feel scummy because of the circumstances around the EoD1 wagons.

There was one interaction I highlighted that seemed like possible partner-signaling. Other than that the only thing tying them together is that they haven't really gone after each other.

I'm not feeling terrific about this lackadaisical day end. Maybe it makes sense to try to force a wagon other than the one that's been sitting here for days and that scum clearly seems to be OK with?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #751 on: March 06, 2021, 05:03:27 pm »

Of course if ash IS gkrieg's partner it makes sense that there's no defense effort, since he's effectively V/LA.

And also, this is the classic thing where I say I want to switch because there's no defense and for everyone else that seems like it IS the defense. And I don't know what to do about that so I'm just naming it.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #752 on: March 06, 2021, 05:04:21 pm »

joth's breakdown into two groups is almost completely arbitrary. gkrieg reinforcing it feels scummy.

Which breakdown?

Is EFHW talking here about Ashersky's breakdown into two groups, or did Joth really post something like that? As far as I can see, Joth has absolutely been tunnelling Ash all day, and is now voting gkrieg only because he things gkrieg is likely to be scumbuddies of one kind or another with Ash.

Is there a general gkrieg-supporting-Ash vibe that both Joth and EFHW are picking up on here? I mean, I think gkrieg is one of several players expressing non-surprise at Ash's counterclaim as a possible town play, but I don't see what singles him out. On the other hand, I see faust pushing the one-scum-off-wagon argument to put pressure on one of me, Didds and gkrieg being scum, a nd that's something I think really does feel scummy because of the circumstances around the EoD1 wagons.

There was one interaction I highlighted that seemed like possible partner-signaling. Other than that the only thing tying them together is that they haven't really gone after each other.

I'm not feeling terrific about this lackadaisical day end. Maybe it makes sense to try to force a wagon other than the one that's been sitting here for days and that scum clearly seems to be OK with?

Yeah let's start a wagon with 4 people around less than 1 hour before deadline, what a great idea joth.

By the way, I'm shooting gkrieg if I forget to hammer (so, if we decide to exile gkrieg but we don't for some reason), so remember that only scum can have bulletproof.

Of course if ash IS gkrieg's partner it makes sense that there's no defense effort, since he's effectively V/LA.

And also, this is the classic thing where I say I want to switch because there's no defense and for everyone else that seems like it IS the defense. And I don't know what to do about that so I'm just naming it.

Ash could've fought harder for gkrieg, in, like, the past 2 days, it's not like this exile wasn't seen from a mile away.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #753 on: March 06, 2021, 05:06:05 pm »

It should be clear to anyone reading that I would not possibly be mcmc's partner here. You had a bit of an (albeit terrible) argument when it came to MiX, seeing as he was the alternative wagon - there the claim would be that it was an attempt to save MiX. But now we know it was town v town, so there is literally zero reason for any scumteam to put all their votes behind a bad misexile.

Did this one ever get clearly explained? I know gkrieg picket at it, because it was his comment in one of his stream-of-reactions-posting-streak things that reminded me of the post.

I really disagree with the "literally zero reason" part of this post from faust. I think there's a strong possibility that all the non-townie people (whether full mafia or possible traitor) could easily be on mathdude. That's because several players were making posts about reading the newbie as scummy, and not all of those doing so could have been scum. On top of that, there were people like MiX pushing mathdude really hard at the end, and other players seconding/supporting that, and since clearly not all those players can be scum, scums must have been seeing a big swell of town opinion against mathdude, so I see no reason for scum not to go with the path of least resistance and vote mathdude here, keeping MiX around to sew confusion and/or as an easy mixile later in the game, since people like me and gkrieg had already been tunnelling him.

That reasoning makes me way less confident than usual in the argument that "five towns voting a townie is highly unusual", which I might under other circumstances have been invoking to say that there's probably (at least) one scum in {MiX, gkrieg, Didds}, with me added to that group from everyone else's perspective.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #754 on: March 06, 2021, 05:09:27 pm »

Of course if ash IS gkrieg's partner it makes sense that there's no defense effort, since he's effectively V/LA.

And also, this is the classic thing where I say I want to switch because there's no defense and for everyone else that seems like it IS the defense. And I don't know what to do about that so I'm just naming it.

Nah, I get that. I've done my gkrieg read and it's really not possible to work out whether I feel like there's anything deliberately scummy rather than just busy low-effort town who posts catch-up thoughts real-time so they're even slightly contradictory with each other (especially his read on you and maybe  EFHW) and then doesn't do any actual analysis.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #755 on: March 06, 2021, 05:10:22 pm »

Yeah let's start a wagon with 4 people around less than 1 hour before deadline, what a great idea joth.

It's worked before.

Do you think gkrieg is scum?

If so, why do you think there's been so little resistance to this wagon?

Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #756 on: March 06, 2021, 05:12:23 pm »

Yeah let's start a wagon with 4 people around less than 1 hour before deadline, what a great idea joth.

It's worked before.

Do you think gkrieg is scum?

If so, why do you think there's been so little resistance to this wagon?

Because ash cannot resist it harder than he was the entirety of Day 2.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #757 on: March 06, 2021, 05:16:10 pm »

Here are my notes from re-reading gkrieg

#47 Opens with an Ash vote.
#103 Continuing interaction with ash.
#104 Response to Joth about being inactive at the weekends.
(big gap 21st Feb 11.21 to 23rd Feb 22:25)
#236 Apology for being inactive
#294 Start of re-read (24th Feb 18:20).
#295 Comments on MiX's weird early Joth case.
#298,#300 etc Says he may be tunneling MiX.
#301,#302 Townie on WCD and Dylan.
#411 Comes into D2 voting for MiX, though Dylan and I are already there too.
#471 Another post about being away. (He was absent for ~46 hours).
#524 Start of giant re-read. Focuses on mcmc and then MiX to begin with.
#529 The U-turn on Joth that I already mentioned, where he scumread Joth at #525, but agrees with my townread on exactly the same thing at #529.
#53* Much of this re-read is either saying people are townie, or asking people to give more info on their own scureads. That is a bit scummy from gkrieg, because he's relying on other people's scum cases rather than making any of his own.
#541 gkrieg asks faust about why he thinks my pursuit of MiX was illogical, but then immediately says faust has a point in an earlier response he'd made to me, which in turn I think I'd addressed pretty well, so obviously I don't agree that faust had a point. It's another example of subtly stirring what may be town-v-town arguments in a way that makes other people make the cases for him.
#545 Okay, at least he's trying to check what faust's on about here.
#553 talks about "the faust/Space faceoff", which would be a good phrase for scum to use if they want to put focus on a town-v-town disagreement, especially since I'm in the "leaning townie" bucket and faust is in the "leaning scummy" one.
#610,#611 Says that joth hasn't done anything townie, so he's still in the scum bucked even though he'd agreed that he seems townie. That's almost too inconsistent to be a scum stance, isn't it? I can kind of see where it's coming from, if he's summing up different sets of scumpoints and townpoints, but I don't see how "hasn't done much townie" gives enough scumpoints to counteract "scum!mcmc was super-unlikely to bus".
#633,#639 I do feel townie on gkrieg when he argues against this wagon argument of faust's, because I really don't see a good reason for town!faust to be pushing that.
#692 Insisting there's one scum left and one traitor seems like a town thing, because scum will have been more invested in the details. That's nothing a scum!gkrieg couldn't fake, though, so not sure there's much alignment indication there.
#695 Points out that Didds and Dylan are under-the-radar, which is a bit ironic given that most of his posts have been catch-up reactions with no real cases or analysis.
#727 Says scum is most likely to be in {Didds, joth, Dylan}. I'm concerned that the fact he says he's not getting scummy vibes from EFHW any more is enough for him to remove her from that pool, but the fact that joth just hasn't done anything townie enough for gkrieg to feel warm and fuzzy about has landed him in the pool after all... that just feels inconsistent, and like some manipulation is happening there. Also he keeps picking at what I think are valid points against faust, but then putting faust in a prob!town sort of bucket.

The main sources of scumpoints are just that there's no decent case or analysis, only some reactions to agree with people (even people with opposing viewpoints like me and faust), and some questions that may make other people put out or develop scum cases on other players. Maybe that's scummy manipulation, or maybe it's just an effort to engage without putting a lot of time into it. The scumread on Joth isn't something I understand, nor is the no-scummy-vibes read on EFHW. Overall it's a resounding "dunno".
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #758 on: March 06, 2021, 05:23:55 pm »

Space Count:

faust (1): SpaceAnemone
gkrieg13 (4): faust, WestCoastDidds, jotheonah, EFHW
ashersky (1): MiX
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, ashersky, gkrieg13
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #759 on: March 06, 2021, 05:24:33 pm »

Space Count:

faust (1): SpaceAnemone
gkrieg13 (4): faust, WestCoastDidds, jotheonah, EFHW
ashersky (1): MiX
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, ashersky, gkrieg13

You can hammer too if you want.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #760 on: March 06, 2021, 05:24:47 pm »

Why are you making weird arbitrary deadlines? Just wait until gkrieg shows up, or you have to go to bed, or the Day ends, whichever happens first.

The day ends in 2 hours, right? If I wait until gkrieg shows up, he might not, so I miss the hammer. I don't have to leave before the day ends, so if I wait for that, I miss the hammer. If I wait for the Day to end, I might wait too long and show up late, so I miss the hammer.

I think there's still like 4-5 hours, not 2.

Oh, you're right. Ok then I can wait longer.

I presume you're busy for anything except simple explanations?

Yes.

Ok but really I'm at least at my computer and will be tabbing back and forth to make sure something goes through, but I'm still having to work right now.

I think Space is actually making a lot of sense in the last few posts, particularly 753, so I'm starting to not feel as good about a gkrieg exile. I totally agreed with faust that the/an other scum was off wagon D1 earlier, but that was a good point why that would be less certain than normal given how the day went down.

ppe 3
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #761 on: March 06, 2021, 05:27:08 pm »

It's weird that gkrieg isn't even voting. He's backed up the "not Ash" camp, but I would've thought he'd at least try to vote faust with me in self-defence.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #762 on: March 06, 2021, 05:29:42 pm »

So many thing about this day have been weird
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #763 on: March 06, 2021, 05:31:51 pm »

I think Space is actually making a lot of sense in the last few posts, particularly 753, so I'm starting to not feel as good about a gkrieg exile. I totally agreed with faust that the/an other scum was off wagon D1 earlier, but that was a good point why that would be less certain than normal given how the day went down.

I've been saying that all day. Plus there's the other point I've been making about the wagons, which is that with a bodyguard death, we can't tell whether scum intended to kill on-wagon or off-wagon, which is a choice I'd usually think about when looking at the wagons.

My #753 was definitely more of a "case on faust" post than a "case that gkrieg is not necessarily an optimal exile" post, though, so it's odd that you're having pause on gkrieg but not going as far as to express any other scumreads at all, to the point where you may go up to deadline not having voted for anyone other than MiX all day. You're not making later wagon PoE very easy for town with that sort of lack of voting. What are your other reads looking like?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #764 on: March 06, 2021, 05:36:10 pm »

Space Count:

faust (1): SpaceAnemone
gkrieg13 (4): faust, WestCoastDidds, jotheonah, EFHW
ashersky (1): MiX
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, ashersky, gkrieg13

You can hammer too if you want.

I don't want to. I'd rather use my time to put my ideas down and get people to consider the alternatives people haven't been thinking about enough. Even if I'm wrong about there not really being a strong enough case on gkrieg, there's still another person on the scumteam out there to find. And I do think that Joth's absolutely right that the lack of resistance to such a slow and steady wagon probably adds evidence to the town!gkrieg side of the balance.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #765 on: March 06, 2021, 05:37:06 pm »

Space Count:

faust (1): SpaceAnemone
gkrieg13 (4): faust, WestCoastDidds, jotheonah, EFHW
ashersky (1): MiX
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, ashersky, gkrieg13

You can hammer too if you want.

I don't want to. I'd rather use my time to put my ideas down and get people to consider the alternatives people haven't been thinking about enough. Even if I'm wrong about there not really being a strong enough case on gkrieg, there's still another person on the scumteam out there to find. And I do think that Joth's absolutely right that the lack of resistance to such a slow and steady wagon probably adds evidence to the town!gkrieg side of the balance.

Alright, I'll hold until the very end. Good luck!
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #766 on: March 06, 2021, 05:46:54 pm »

Alright, I'll hold until the very end. Good luck!

Don't let me make it go too close to the wire. Am putting a "last thoughts" post together now, but it might not have anything super-interesting.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #767 on: March 06, 2021, 05:49:24 pm »

I think we’re 6 minutes out now
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #768 on: March 06, 2021, 05:51:38 pm »

Vote: gkrieg
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #769 on: March 06, 2021, 05:52:33 pm »

Thread Locked
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #770 on: March 06, 2021, 06:31:44 pm »


"Well it has been another day of debate everyone, and a decision needs to be reached. So who is it gonna be...?"

gkrieg has be Exiled! They were gkrieg, the Vanilla Townie!
« Last Edit: March 08, 2021, 02:07:41 pm by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #771 on: March 06, 2021, 06:31:52 pm »

Vote Count 2.Final:

gkrieg (5): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth, EFHW, MiX
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, Ashersky, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it took 5 to Exile.
Night 2 starts now and ends in 48 hours. That is Monday, March 8th at 6:30pm Forum Time.
Please submit any Night Actions within 36 hours.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2021, 02:09:10 pm by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #772 on: March 08, 2021, 09:47:39 pm »

Game starting in an hour or so when I’m back from coaching.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #773 on: March 08, 2021, 11:06:26 pm »

"I cannot believe we were wrong", whispers faust to a huddled group.
   "Neither can I...", says WCD... "But, why are we here? Joth, you said MiX had something to tell us right?"
"Yeah... That's right... but I can't seem to locate them..."



MiX has died at night! They were MiX, the Town Aligned Vigilante!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #774 on: March 08, 2021, 11:06:52 pm »

Vote Count 3.0:

Not Voting (7): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, faust, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time.

THREAD UNLOCKED!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #775 on: March 09, 2021, 12:53:07 am »

Assuming MiX shot, he targeted a bad guy with bulletproof?  Seems unlikely he would forget to put in an order.

Glad I can still read gkrieg correctly.

What huddled group was faust whispering to?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #776 on: March 09, 2021, 01:34:24 am »

Assuming MiX shot, he targeted a bad guy with bulletproof?  Seems unlikely he would forget to put in an order.
There would have been a decent argument to be made for not shooting I think. But, it's also possible he shot a Traitor (or Bulletproof scum I guess, but noone in their right mind would pick Bulletproof).

What huddled group was faust whispering to?
I don't know! My correspondence with huddled groups is news to me too.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #777 on: March 09, 2021, 01:36:48 am »

ashersky, would you care to explain your vigilante claim now?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #778 on: March 09, 2021, 01:47:54 am »

ashersky, would you care to explain your vigilante claim now?

So, a few things.

1) I never claimed to be a vigilante.
2) I am happy to explain my counterclaim.  To do, I need some quotes:

I forgot that the Traitor has a 1-shot BP. Might be worth counterclaiming then I suppose. It doesn't matter because there will be no counterclaim.

I read this post from faust and immediately decided to counterclaim.  I, as many others here would probably agree, absolutely felt that I could not allow faust making such an omnipotent statement to go unchallenged and unproven wrong.  The post rubbed me entirely the wrong way, so I decided immediately, without reading the rest of the thread.

I then read the rest of the thread, saw no other counterclaim to that time, and posted:

I’ll bite.

I am counter-claiming MiX.

vote: faust

I did exactly what faust said would not happen, thereby proving that faust is not infallible.  That's all there is to it, really, as far as my motivation goes.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #779 on: March 09, 2021, 01:49:33 am »

Further:

Were I claiming vigilante, I would have used those words at some point, would have claimed a target (such as mcmc), etc.

Also, I pointed out that I tried to aim the vigilante shot at MiX:

If it helps, I attempted to aim the vig shot at MiX in my QT last night.  I am not lying.

This will be proven post-game when QTs are made public.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #780 on: March 09, 2021, 01:53:36 am »

Now, as to the "good/bad" play argument; there is no right answer, only opinions.  Here are a few:

--had mafia mistaken my claim as a vigilante claim, as faust appears to have done, they may have been hesitant about which claimant to NK.  That may have saved MiX for another night.  This did not come to pass.

--regardless, I do believe that MiX believed my claim for what it was, and would not have shot me last night.  That means my claim improved his odds of shooting a mafia member at night by removing one town member from his potential pool.

--the claim did inspire at least a few players to take a look at other players instead of either MiX or myself, thereby producing more minutes of study on possible mafia members and not town members.

I'm fine with being exiled now, if that's the consensus.  Remember that two of you six are not aligned with the rest, though.  Let me know if you prefer my vote be on or off wagon.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #781 on: March 09, 2021, 01:55:32 am »

Assuming MiX shot, he targeted a bad guy with bulletproof?  Seems unlikely he would forget to put in an order.
There would have been a decent argument to be made for not shooting I think. But, it's also possible he shot a Traitor (or Bulletproof scum I guess, but noone in their right mind would pick Bulletproof).

I fully agree with you that choosing BP is not optimal.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #782 on: March 09, 2021, 02:18:36 am »

faust making such an omnipotent statement
I think the word you are looking for is omniscient  :)
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #783 on: March 09, 2021, 04:18:49 am »

Vote: Dylan32

Although I am also quite tempted to vote ash.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #784 on: March 09, 2021, 07:38:21 am »

So MiX is 2 for 2 hitting scum. Good for him. Do we think there’s any chance he breadcrumbed his target? That’s probably the first thing I’ll look for on a re-read.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #785 on: March 09, 2021, 07:47:46 am »

So MiX is 2 for 2 hitting scum. Good for him. Do we think there’s any chance he breadcrumbed his target? That’s probably the first thing I’ll look for on a re-read.
Why do you asssume MiX shot at all? He said this:

Says the guy that wanted to essentially hammer the vig. Honestly, I'm no longer useful, since one of the scum has a 1-shot bulletproof, and the bodyguard's dead. I'm just an IC...a MIC if you will.
Now granted, there is an amount of WIFOM involved, but shooting was never a great idea at this stage of the game.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #786 on: March 09, 2021, 08:33:53 am »

Maybe you’re right. My own read of MiX’s personality is that he’d take the shot.

In retrospect, we should have directed his shot or  made him claim his target. Then we’d have a chance of having caught  scum today.

ash, all I’ll say is that if you’re honest with yourself about your play yesterday you’ll see that the bad outweighed the good— in addition to the possible benefits you listed, the detriment was that youcc be rested an amorphous amount of noise that pre-occupied the town and kept us from focusing on scum hunting. All for the sake of contradicting an off-hand comment from faust. I think the claim is anti town for that reason alone.

What I’m trying to figure out is whether it’s actually something scum!ash does.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #787 on: March 09, 2021, 08:54:56 am »

Joth, I 100% think MiX takes the shot! I’ll reread the latter part of D2 when I get a chance.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #788 on: March 09, 2021, 08:58:44 am »

Glad I can still read gkrieg correctly.
I am kind of curious whether this is an attempt to spin the narrative or just something ash thought but never shared. I don't think ash gave a read on gkrieg beyond like early D1. In fact I got the distinct impression that he agreed with some of the things I pointed out.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #789 on: March 09, 2021, 09:52:18 am »

Maybe you’re right. My own read of MiX’s personality is that he’d take the shot.

I completely agree with this, and think he will have taken a shot.

Joth, I 100% think MiX takes the shot! I’ll reread the latter part of D2 when I get a chance.

Since MiX credited me a lot with his choice of shot for N1, I tried to be clear that faust was my top scumread going into N2. Unfortunately, the thread locked a couple of minutes earlier than I was expecting, so I didn't get to post that "last thoughts" collection I was working on in time, but I think my vote being on faust and my refusal to take the hammer at least helped underline that it was a genuine scumread.

Of course, MiX is a law unto himself, so maybe there's a crumb I missed pointing to someone entirely different. For now, though, I think if he did shoot it would be faust (or ash on the outside), and if he didn't, he'll be utterly perplexed that we'd even consider he would take a shot, and there's probably not an in-between option :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #790 on: March 09, 2021, 10:03:15 am »

I think if he did shoot it would be faust
This is wild. you are aware that MiX townread me, yes?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #791 on: March 09, 2021, 10:46:14 am »

Some notes as I do a reread (probably more of a re-skim).

- we get some very early pressure on mcmc by Space and Robz. That is kind of the sort of thing that scum want to be a part of. But I never goes anywhere.
- we have a little joth wagon of {mcmc, faust, ash}. I find it vaguely notable that ash and mcmc are voting together here; if ash is scum I could imagine him following a "all scum on the same wagon" sort of approach.
- Space later doubles down on the mcmc vote. This is a point where it would have been very easy to abandon a bus - Space was the only person on mcmc anyways, and discussion had moved elsewhere.
- as of vote count 1.4 we have 2 sort-of alternative wagons for the mathdude thing, maybe. One is Space, supported by mathdude and Robz (i.e. all town), the other is EFHW, supported by Didds and MiX (where Didds could still be scum)
- gkrieg starts the MiX wagon, and Didds jumps immediately. I feel like Didds did a lot of convenient agreeing
- when Space joins the MiX wagon, they're still very open to going for mathdude. Seems like scum could have taken a stronger stance here. After all, scum already got what they want - mathdude outed as a PR.

That's like, notable D1 stuff.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #792 on: March 09, 2021, 11:28:27 am »

ash, all I’ll say is that if you’re honest with yourself about your play yesterday you’ll see that the bad outweighed the good— in addition to the possible benefits you listed, the detriment was that youcc be rested an amorphous amount of noise that pre-occupied the town and kept us from focusing on scum hunting. All for the sake of contradicting an off-hand comment from faust. I think the claim is anti town for that reason alone.

What I’m trying to figure out is whether it’s actually something scum!ash does.

I feel like I disagree here, but I think defining the bad and the good are such subjective things when it comes to a specific day in a specific game.  There's also the fact that had things gone differently, the balance of "good" and "bad" things would also change, and probably in a different way for each person.

Like, say in a best case scenario, MiX shot mafia that wasn't bulletproof AND mafia shot me instead of MiX at least in part because of my play.  Then I believe even you would say that the "good" outweighed the "bad" for the day.

That there are multiple possible outcomes/universes at each decision point is what makes certain plays good, even when they turn out to be bad.  You weigh the possible outcomes, decide if the good ones are worth the risk of the bad ones, and go for it, or not.

All in all, I feel like the result in this universe was a wash.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #793 on: March 09, 2021, 12:39:06 pm »

FYI "youcc be rested an amorphous" is an autocorrect mess that should have been "you generated an enormous"
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #794 on: March 09, 2021, 04:26:59 pm »

faust, your argument that appealed to me yesterday was that it was likely that at least one scum was off the mathdude wagon.  It wasn't gkrieg, and I know it wasn't me.  That leaves Space.

How are you feeling about them?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #795 on: March 09, 2021, 07:59:27 pm »

Glad to see we're back. Swamped lately, but should surface soon.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #796 on: March 09, 2021, 09:46:07 pm »

Vote Count 3.0:

Dylan32 (1): faust
Not Voting (6): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #797 on: March 10, 2021, 12:28:05 am »

I just want to lay this out, as it came to me overnight:

From any single town perspective out there, you should be looking for two mafia in five players.  Basically, take the player list, subtract yourself and me, and you have a nice pool with which to work.

That is, of course, if you think I didn't do what I did as a mafia member.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #798 on: March 10, 2021, 01:31:18 am »

faust, your argument that appealed to me yesterday was that it was likely that at least one scum was off the mathdude wagon.  It wasn't gkrieg, and I know it wasn't me.  That leaves Space.

How are you feeling about them?
Looking back at things, I don't quite think Space makes a lot of sense as mcmc's partner. I guess if they're the Traitor the case might be stronger? But I'm not interested in a Space exile today. If we're looking off-wagon, I prefer you.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #799 on: March 10, 2021, 03:02:02 am »

I just want to lay this out, as it came to me overnight:

From any single town perspective out there, you should be looking for two mafia in five players.  Basically, take the player list, subtract yourself and me, and you have a nice pool with which to work.

That is, of course, if you think I didn't do what I did as a mafia member.
Or you could subtract me! If you think I didn't do what I did as a mafia member.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #800 on: March 10, 2021, 05:55:27 am »

faust, your argument that appealed to me yesterday was that it was likely that at least one scum was off the mathdude wagon.  It wasn't gkrieg, and I know it wasn't me.  That leaves Space.

How are you feeling about them?
Looking back at things, I don't quite think Space makes a lot of sense as mcmc's partner. I guess if they're the Traitor the case might be stronger? But I'm not interested in a Space exile today. If we're looking off-wagon, I prefer you.

Are we looking off-wagon, though? You seemed to be scumreading me yesterday for not pushing the line that "five towns on town is too unlikely to happen", but are you actually pushing that yourself now?

I acknowledge is a line I would generally have taken, but also I think this game has specific circumstances that make me willing to believe it could happen: namely that there was a growing inevitable-looking wagon on our newbie, and then an alternative wagon on a really scummy-looking MiX who actual scum probably didn't want to exile so early. I think those pressures combine to make it more likely than otherwise to find scum on the Mathdude wagon. Clearly whichever scum who were on there were sharing the wagon with townies expressing a genuine sentiment about how scummy Mathdude looked, even though I would argue that just the scumminess was just from not following our own particular mafia-playing culture on what (not) to say. I don't even think scum is necessarily going to be the ring-leaders of that, but I think they were probably comfortable leaving a vote there too because it wouldn't stand out.

Anyone who was on the Mathdude wagon has better PoE than I do about the remaining members. For faust in particular, though, is there a good reason to assume that a Dylan-EFHW scum pairing is so much less likely than Didds-EFHW that Didds needs to be the top consideration for today?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #801 on: March 10, 2021, 06:03:08 am »

Anyone who was on the Mathdude wagon has better PoE than I do about the remaining members. For faust in particular, though, is there a good reason to assume that a Dylan-EFHW scum pairing is so much less likely than Didds-EFHW that Didds needs to be the top consideration for today?
I am not saying Didds should be top consideration. In fact, I am voting for Dylan. I think Didds is more likely scum than you are, but I feel like Dylan might be a better shot.

Also not quite sure what makes EFHW show up in your pairings, I feel like she's town though I can probably not back that up if pressed.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #802 on: March 10, 2021, 06:07:53 am »

This sequence of posts looks pretty bad for Dylan:

Ok, that claim leads me to believe it was an indirect claim of a specific role. If I'm right, I don't think I want to unvote because it's the best of the options for scum to fakeclaim. If I'm actually wrong, I would move. So I think at this point, like Space said, you should probably just be specific.
Intent to hammer

ppe mix how does robz tie into your team theory?
I'm not saying he's right, but those last 3 messages are exactly what my meta memory has stored for town!mix, if only he hadn't brought attention to being self-aware about it with his very last line... That tempers the feeling a little bit.

ppe 2

Dylan requests more information from mathdude so he can make up his mind, then mcmc posts intent to hammer and Dylan does not unvote -  why? If Dylan truly was waiting for info then he should have made sure that mathdude could provide it.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #803 on: March 10, 2021, 11:56:56 am »

Rereading Day 2.

- we have the early MiX wagon where the first 3 votes are Space, Dylan, gkrieg. Not a ton to analyse; it happened quickly, and once it got to 3 votes scum wouldn't just join.
- it is notable that when MiX is at 3 votes and gkrieg at 2, Didds decides to open another wagon (on EFHW) rather than join the existing ones. This is at least consistent with scum!Didds who would be content with having 2 town wagons and saw no need to incriminate herself.
- ash throws his weight behind the MiX wagon. This is... not strictly necessary if he's scum, same reasoning as with Didds above makes ash look somewhat townier. This is also true of joth but to a lesser extent; he is more guarded about his MiX read. Anyways it feels like scum wouldn't rush into that exile, among the people who were willing to exile MiX is probably only 1 scum (though it might be that the Traitor was there and joined by the other scum). So who's not there? me, EFHW, Didds. Worth keeping in mind.
- after the MiX wagon fizzles out, gkrieg throws his support behind EFHW, who is now at 2 conf!town votes.
- then we get a ton of derailment via ash's "counterclaim" unfortunately
- after the dust settles we have votes on me, ash, gkrieg. It's interesting that despite EFHW having been talked about a good amount there is no more real pressure on her

Hmpf. EFHW comes away from this a good deal scummier than I remembered. That's my main takeaway. I still like Dylan but he just hasn't done a lot D2, so there's not much new data.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #804 on: March 10, 2021, 12:33:11 pm »

I have not stopped thinking EFHW is scummy.

Her play is really different in that she is not asking questions or pinning folks down, and is just generally flying much lower than usual.  Its hard for me to think about "usual" though because she was scum for so many games in our collective recent pass. I moved off of her yesterday as a result of the argument that gkrieg looked worse in POE off-wagon. If he had flipped scum, I'd be confident of faust's towniness than I currently am.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #805 on: March 10, 2021, 12:49:31 pm »

I keep coming back to the idea that if faust and ash were both town, we would have hit scum by now.

Idk if that's fair, just expecting the strong players to carry us, but the game intuitively makes more sense to me if one of them is not really trying to help. And if that is the case, I think it's pretty obvious which one of them isn't being helpful.

vote: ashersky

Open to a lot of other wagons though -- Dylan, EFHW, Didds.
Not really interested in Space or faust as of now.

Another annoying thing about ashersky's counterclaim is it really feels like he was leaving his options open to either double down and make it a "real" counterclaim or to back out and say it was a fake counterclaim (which he did). It reads like a bold move but it was actually a very tepid move, easy to back out of if it goes wrong (thanks in no small part to his unique meta).
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #806 on: March 10, 2021, 01:42:50 pm »

Rereading Day 2. ...
Hmpf. EFHW comes away from this a good deal scummier than I remembered. That's my main takeaway. I still like Dylan but he just hasn't done a lot D2, so there's not much new data.

I'm scummy, or the VC implies that I might be scummy? And Dylan's lack of activity is exonerating? I actually liked your point about his not unvoting. I was trying to think of how that might happen for town!Dylan, and my one thought was that he might see mcmc as a leader and therefore conform to his example. Then I remembered mcmc was scum, and that seemed even more possible.

I'm not super active (see swamped comment earlier), but I have taken positions.

vote: Dylan.

Open to Didds as well. Towny on faust, joth and Space. Annoyed on ash = undecided.

Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #807 on: March 10, 2021, 01:43:45 pm »

Clarification - I remembered mcmc was scum and then it seemed that scum!Dylan would be strongly influenced to follow his example.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #808 on: March 10, 2021, 02:52:16 pm »

This sequence of posts looks pretty bad for Dylan:

Ok, that claim leads me to believe it was an indirect claim of a specific role. If I'm right, I don't think I want to unvote because it's the best of the options for scum to fakeclaim. If I'm actually wrong, I would move. So I think at this point, like Space said, you should probably just be specific.
Intent to hammer

ppe mix how does robz tie into your team theory?
I'm not saying he's right, but those last 3 messages are exactly what my meta memory has stored for town!mix, if only he hadn't brought attention to being self-aware about it with his very last line... That tempers the feeling a little bit.

ppe 2

Dylan requests more information from mathdude so he can make up his mind, then mcmc posts intent to hammer and Dylan does not unvote -  why? If Dylan truly was waiting for info then he should have made sure that mathdude could provide it.

The posts you quote here don't logically lead to the conclusion you pointed to though, so I'm confused, first of all why you made it, but more so EFHW jumping on it saying it makes sense and adding an even weaker reason to it...

In the first post, I straight up said I thought they were softclaiming the role scum would most likely claim (vig, but of course I don't explicitly say it here to not give him clues if he wasn't actually doing that, and I said I didn't want to unvote there until after I heard something different. I straight up said though, "If I'm actually wrong, I'll move."  If mathdude had come back and said what he eventually did before the hammer, that he was the RB, I would have unvoted since I was wrong about what he was claiming there, and that was probably not something scum would have tried to claim there D1.

In the years I've played on here, I don't actually remember a game where scum posted Intent to hammer and 30 minutes later hammered without actually giving the wagonee time to claim. Mcmc likely hammered because he was afraid of giving mathdude a chance to claim and letting the wagon move to someone else. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember anyone else on the wagon even remotely suggesting they would be willing to move off the wagon, it was only me. So if anything, my willingness to move and mcmc's quickhammer making sure I couldn't actually should be pretty strong evidence that I'm actually NOT mcmc's partner, because he wouldn't have felt so worried about that wagon breaking up post claim. Consider this sequence of posts that faust so carefully crafted particularly the timing of his contribution.

Ok, that claim leads me to believe it was an indirect claim of a specific role. If I'm right, I don't think I want to unvote because it's the best of the options for scum to fakeclaim. If I'm actually wrong, I would move. So I think at this point, like Space said, you should probably just be specific.

Next post:

Intent to make someone hammer math

That's a traitor claim if I've ever seen one.

MiX posts 2 more elaborating on why he thought that was a traitor claim.

Intent to hammer

ppe mix how does robz tie into your team theory?

MiX answers mcmc's question.

I'm not saying he's right, but those last 3 messages are exactly what my meta memory has stored for town!mix, if only he hadn't brought attention to being self-aware about it with his very last line... That tempers the feeling a little bit.

ppe 2

... thus pointing out that I'm finding MiX's series of posts towny regardless of if his theory was correct.

MiX and I go back and forth a couple messages and I remember something Ash said that reinforced my thought that MiX might be correct about the traitor claim.

and then:

Intent to make someone hammer math

That's a traitor claim if I've ever seen one.
Seconded.

joth posts once, and then:

Vote: Mathdude

In retrospect the post math made about town power roles screams of traitor as well.

Well, some people are active enough that I could find "reasons" I think pretty much any of them could be scum or reasons any of them could be town.  However, there is definitely TONS of useful interactions that have been happening, so that bodes well for tomorrow.  Town, we have to carefully use any PR's to make sure the results can be useful not only individually, but also in how the results may interact with those interactions... if that makes any sense.  (Getting a read on someone is helpful... but getting a read on someone that you're fairly certain is connected to another someone can be even more useful).

But now I'm torn between 2 options.  Do we try to vote someone out who we have mild suspicions of, who we can actually connect their reveal-on-exile to the statements made by others about them on day-1?  Or do we just go for the less active lurkers, to make sure they don't just hide through a couple days?

Yeah, sorry! Started a re-read of everyone earlier, but didn't finish it before the evening's social calls, and now it's past bedtime. Still have notes in another tab, but it will have to wait till tomorrow at this point. My sanity is on a lot thinner ground than it was in the beforetimes, so bedtime needs to be that bit more strict :-(

vote: Space
Reason: post more!

So faust had the chance to unvote there too if he wanted more info, but instead reinforced that he wanted mathdude to be hammered, and mcmc obliged immediately.  To EFHW's point about me seeing mcmc as a leader or something, how about scum!mcmc following scum!faust's coaching and obliging with the hammer he requested on the spot?

I know it will probably be read as omgus, but given that EoD1, and how faust has been driving the conversation and leading several of the less active people along with him (myself included for the last couple days), I actually am starting the think there's a pretty strong case to be made for scum!faust here.  More reasons for this read than just this, but I'll have to type them out later.

On a tangent, I will hopefully be much more available this game day. Last weekend held a work deadline that had pretty serious implications for whether I would be continuing to work for the same organization or not, so that was where nearly all my focus was for the week or so leading up to it. That's behind, it went well, and I have more space to think now.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #809 on: March 10, 2021, 04:57:22 pm »

unvote. Great, now I'm townreading Dylan and scum reading faust. I need to get my act together.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #810 on: March 11, 2021, 12:22:56 am »

Vote Count 3.1:

Dylan32 (1): faust
Ashersky (1): Joth
Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, SpaceAnenome, EFHW, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #811 on: March 11, 2021, 01:07:00 am »

How do people feel about posting updated popsquizes?

faust/EFHW
WCD/Space/Dylan
Joth

I feel like my current opinions group the remaining players into these groupings, which runs sort of mafia to town.  Basically, I feel strongly that ONE of faust and EFHW must be mafia given activity level, play, and reaction to me.

Space could be in that above group, or the below group, so just apply the language from those to them.

WCD and Dylan fall into the underactive, flying under the radar, but sometimes posts towny stuff pile.

Joth I think is just town from my experience reading him.

So that's that.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #812 on: March 11, 2021, 02:10:34 am »

In the years I've played on here, I don't actually remember a game where scum posted Intent to hammer and 30 minutes later hammered without actually giving the wagonee time to claim.
Haha, well done for giving a sufficiently specific description that it probably has not happened in exactly this way before. Unfortunately, people quickhammering without leaving time to claim happens all the time. So unless you want to claim that you knew that mcmc is scum (in which case, by all means, go ahead), the fact that he's scum should have had no impact on your decision-making there.

Mcmc likely hammered because he was afraid of giving mathdude a chance to claim and letting the wagon move to someone else. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember anyone else on the wagon even remotely suggesting they would be willing to move off the wagon, it was only me. So if anything, my willingness to move and mcmc's quickhammer making sure I couldn't actually should be pretty strong evidence that I'm actually NOT mcmc's partner, because he wouldn't have felt so worried about that wagon breaking up post claim.
This is all a bit convoluted. The assumption that mcmc was afraid of giving mathdude a chance to claim is shaky at best. What would he be afraid of? Generally it is favorable to scum to force as many claims a possible D1, and the main alternative wagon at the time was MiX, so it's not like there was a big threat of a scum exile.

That said, of course, I don't really understand why mcmc did what he did. The closest thing I can imagine to a good reason is he wanted to attract the attention of any investigative roles because his role makes him immune to those.

So faust had the chance to unvote there too if he wanted more info, but instead reinforced that he wanted mathdude to be hammered, and mcmc obliged immediately.  To EFHW's point about me seeing mcmc as a leader or something, how about scum!mcmc following scum!faust's coaching and obliging with the hammer he requested on the spot?
Yes, I could have unvoted. At the time I felt that no role that mathdude could claim would make me change my mind of wanting to exile him. I felt like he was trying to live up to ash's claim of "either PR or scum". With hindsight, I should have considered that if a newbie was scum then scum probably would have chosen Daychat and coachied him into making a better claim. Unfortunately I didn't take the time to think things through.

But the mcmc/faust partner theory doesn't make much sense at all. Like, if I was scum and wanted to boss around my partner(s), surely I'd pick Daychat for that? Also, this would only account for a scenario where mcmc knows that I am scum, so it wouldn't work for Traitor!me. And finally, why oh why would a mcmc/faust team even make that move? What's the gain? Exiling a PR that we might as well have nightkilled? And the cost is that both of us look incredibly scummy for it, surely we'd have to be aware of that?

There is going to be those people who would chime in here with "oh but if one of you dies then the other can make that argument for towncred".  Which is just silly. Like, the occasions where you want to actively work towards getting one of your own killed as scum are already incredibly rare. No matter how much towncred is gained the other one can still be found out via PRs or PoE. It's just a bad strategy. I think I argued for the same point before, both as town in a game thread and as scum in a scum QT. If this would convince anybody to not vote for me, I can try to grab some quotes somewhere.

Besides, I think there are some players who would follow my orders when we're both scum, but I don't really see mcmc as one of them.

I know it will probably be read as omgus, but given that EoD1, and how faust has been driving the conversation and leading several of the less active people along with him (myself included for the last couple days), I actually am starting the think there's a pretty strong case to be made for scum!faust here.  More reasons for this read than just this, but I'll have to type them out later.
Now I'm scum for being active? Please. I hope the reasons you withheld are at least a bit more compelling than that.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #813 on: March 11, 2021, 03:43:07 am »

In the years I've played on here, I don't actually remember a game where scum posted Intent to hammer and 30 minutes later hammered without actually giving the wagonee time to claim.
Haha, well done for giving a sufficiently specific description that it probably has not happened in exactly this way before. Unfortunately, people quickhammering without leaving time to claim happens all the time. So unless you want to claim that you knew that mcmc is scum (in which case, by all means, go ahead), the fact that he's scum should have had no impact on your decision-making there.
--snip--

Fair, that was wordy. I don't remember anyone announcing intent and hammering 30 minutes later before a response. Is that general enough for you? Yeah quickhammers happen, but at that point, most of the people not on the wagon didn't like the wagon (like Space and joth from memory) and Ash was already on, so the risk of a quickhammer seemed pretty low in general. That there was a stated intent made it seem less likely still, so given that we both seemed to think staying on the wagon until post claim was the right move, you can't use that against me, especially since I was the only one of the two of us who stated even a remote willingness to move pending the claim.

--snip--
Mcmc likely hammered because he was afraid of giving mathdude a chance to claim and letting the wagon move to someone else. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember anyone else on the wagon even remotely suggesting they would be willing to move off the wagon, it was only me. So if anything, my willingness to move and mcmc's quickhammer making sure I couldn't actually should be pretty strong evidence that I'm actually NOT mcmc's partner, because he wouldn't have felt so worried about that wagon breaking up post claim.
This is all a bit convoluted. The assumption that mcmc was afraid of giving mathdude a chance to claim is shaky at best. What would he be afraid of? Generally it is favorable to scum to force as many claims a possible D1, and the main alternative wagon at the time was MiX, so it's not like there was a big threat of a scum exile.

That said, of course, I don't really understand why mcmc did what he did. The closest thing I can imagine to a good reason is he wanted to attract the attention of any investigative roles because his role makes him immune to those.

--snip--

Sure scum could have gotten one more person to claim by moving the wagon, but apparently mcmc thought exiling a PR D1 was more important.  Scum knows how many PRs there are and so would have a better idea the odds of hitting one or how many there are.

(Unrelated to our cases on each other, but I actually think mcmc's choice there might be evidence that the number of PRs in the game is on the higher side than the minimum, since having a bunch of uncontested PR claims later would make it much harder for scum to escape POE).  But actually, maybe it is related, because that future POE based on PRs could be what he was afraid of.

Also, several people commented earlier in the game that town!MiX is sometimes a net positive for scum.  It's possible mcmc (and/or scum team depending on daychat or nah) decided a bad looking exile of a PR was worth keeping MiX in the game to obfuscate stuff later.

So yeah, maybe "afraid of mathdude claiming" isn't technically right, but there are quite a few reasons why he might have wanted to be sure that wagon went through instead of letting it go somewhere else, even if town!MiX was the alternative. No matter what the reasoning was, based on what everyone said in thread, I was the person most likely to jump off that wagon (possibly the only person willing to), and mcmc decided not to give mathdude (and consequently me) the chance to break up that wagon.  If I were scum with mcmc, there was simply no pressure to quickhammer there because nobody else had expressed a willingness to move, and two people (MiX and yourself) at least had said you were going to force someone to hammer there, so you def weren't moving.

--snip--
So faust had the chance to unvote there too if he wanted more info, but instead reinforced that he wanted mathdude to be hammered, and mcmc obliged immediately.  To EFHW's point about me seeing mcmc as a leader or something, how about scum!mcmc following scum!faust's coaching and obliging with the hammer he requested on the spot?
1. Yes, I could have unvoted. At the time I felt that no role that mathdude could claim would make me change my mind of wanting to exile him. I felt like he was trying to live up to ash's claim of "either PR or scum". With hindsight, I should have considered that if a newbie was scum then scum probably would have chosen Daychat and coachied him into making a better claim. Unfortunately I didn't take the time to think things through.

2. But the mcmc/faust partner theory doesn't make much sense at all. Like, if I was scum and wanted to boss around my partner(s), surely I'd pick Daychat for that? Also, this would only account for a scenario where mcmc knows that I am scum, so it wouldn't work for Traitor!me. And finally, why oh why would a mcmc/faust team even make that move? What's the gain? Exiling a PR that we might as well have nightkilled? And the cost is that both of us look incredibly scummy for it, surely we'd have to be aware of that?

3. There is going to be those people who would chime in here with "oh but if one of you dies then the other can make that argument for towncred".  Which is just silly. Like, the occasions where you want to actively work towards getting one of your own killed as scum are already incredibly rare. No matter how much towncred is gained the other one can still be found out via PRs or PoE. It's just a bad strategy. I think I argued for the same point before, both as town in a game thread and as scum in a scum QT. If this would convince anybody to not vote for me, I can try to grab some quotes somewhere.

4. Besides, I think there are some players who would follow my orders when we're both scum, but I don't really see mcmc as one of them.

numbers added for reference
1. Obviously, D1 I mostly agreed with you, even if I wasn't quite so strongly convinced as you, so I'm not giving you scumpoints for not unvoting. My point there is more if it was scummy for me there, it's at least as scummy for you if not more so.

2. "surely I'd pick daychat for that?" I mean, this is WIFOM, especially the later sentence about why would you make that play. Like I said above, there's a lot of reasons scum could have come up with to push through that exile. Apparently at least mcmc thought it was worth it, and it honestly doesn't really matter if it was him alone or a team decision, because he did it, so at least 1/3 scum thought it was a good idea.

3. The entire concept of distancing from your partners is based on this principle, which isn't silly. In this paragraph, you move the goalposts from heading off the argument "oh but if one of you dies then the other can make that argument for towncred" to "Like, the occasions where you want to actively work towards getting one of your own killed as scum are already incredibly rare" in 3 sentences. Yes, the latter statement is absolutely true. You should not actively work to get your partners killed in what is likely an overwhelming majority of the time. But the former statement does not inherently mean "actively working to get your partner killed." Rather, it's "should one partner get killed, the other has a plausible argument for why they weren't partners."

So to prove you right, I'll go ahead and say yes, you could have made that exact play as partners. In fact, the way you pushed so hard to look off wagon D2 is a generalized form of this exact argument. "Mcmc and his partner would not have made this play together, and as such the people on wagon get towncred and we should look elsewhere." Instead of just distancing yourself, you included a whole group to make it less obvious that this was what you are doing, if in fact you are scum and this is what you were doing at least.

4. This is totally fair, and I mentioned that more as a response to EFHW's comment that I might view mcmc as a leader, not so much as a main point in the case. If EFHW hadn't made that comment, I probably wouldn't have mentioned that at all.

--snip--
I know it will probably be read as omgus, but given that EoD1, and how faust has been driving the conversation and leading several of the less active people along with him (myself included for the last couple days), I actually am starting the think there's a pretty strong case to be made for scum!faust here.  More reasons for this read than just this, but I'll have to type them out later.
Now I'm scum for being active? Please. I hope the reasons you withheld are at least a bit more compelling than that.

Nice strawman. Being active obviously is not the same thing as driving the conversation. However, perhaps "driving town" would have been more accurate to what I meant to say than "the conversation." Other players were active, in fact more active, than yourself to this point in the game, and yet the narrative seems to have been pretty consistently around wherever you have been focused. Your role (and my own) in mathdude's exile is decently well documented. Skimming back over D2 and it feels like you were pretty much the driving force behind gkrieg's exile. Other people were pushing other wagons, but your push was the one that held sway. In some way at least then, you were the driving force behind D2.

A couple different times, I've seen people divide up the remaining roster into potential scum buckets like A) active scum leading town astray or B) passive scum letting town destroy itself. Town can totally be active, and in fact is probably better when it is. I wouldn't give scum points to you for being active. In fact, so far you've been at about the level I expect from you, so that's NAI. The way I see the game at this point though, is that either scum is in bucket B and you have been the townie they are letting lead town astray so far, or you are scum in bucket A.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #814 on: March 11, 2021, 04:04:03 am »

How do people feel about posting updated popsquizes?

faust/EFHW
WCD/Space/Dylan
Joth

I feel like my current opinions group the remaining players into these groupings, which runs sort of mafia to town.  Basically, I feel strongly that ONE of faust and EFHW must be mafia given activity level, play, and reaction to me.

Space could be in that above group, or the below group, so just apply the language from those to them.

WCD and Dylan fall into the underactive, flying under the radar, but sometimes posts towny stuff pile.

Joth I think is just town from my experience reading him.

So that's that.

Popsquizes? Pop quizzes? Pop's quizzes? Pop squeezes? Pop's queasy? Reads list?

joth seems towny based solely on mcmc interactions D1. I just don't see the partner narrative there with mcmc being mcmc when it comes to busing D1.

Space is probably my highest townread.

I honestly don't remember much of what Didds has said or how they were positioned on anything this game, so I guess my next task is to reread them. Null pending that read.

I was thinking EFHW might be scum, but I'm not sure if scum!EFHW would have unvoted me right there like that.

Faust was an early townread for me. That I found myself agreeing with him a lot D1 probably fed that some. I've been known to mistakenly townread scum when their logic matches up with mine, so that might be what was happening there. After trying to look at the first couple days with a fresh set of eyes in light of the flips we've gotten so far, I'm leaning towards scum.

I have no idea how to read Ash. Take it as a compliment. I would probably be willing to exile just over the counterclaim deal, although I know it's well within town!ash's playstyle. Side note, if you're being honest that it was almost solely to prove faust wrong, that's hilarious, regardless of alignment.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #815 on: March 11, 2021, 04:18:41 am »

Fair, that was wordy. I don't remember anyone announcing intent and hammering 30 minutes later before a response. Is that general enough for you? Yeah quickhammers happen, but at that point, most of the people not on the wagon didn't like the wagon (like Space and joth from memory) and Ash was already on, so the risk of a quickhammer seemed pretty low in general. That there was a stated intent made it seem less likely still, so given that we both seemed to think staying on the wagon until post claim was the right move, you can't use that against me, especially since I was the only one of the two of us who stated even a remote willingness to move pending the claim.
It's not general enough for me.

I don't understand. The claim would have had no impact on my vote, so I did not need to wait for it. Our situations here are not analogous in that way. Also it's pretty weird to say "you can't use that against me". Even if I did the very same thing as you did, I could still find you scummy for doing so.

If I were scum with mcmc, there was simply no pressure to quickhammer there
And that would be relevant if anyone were making the argument that mcmc quickhammered due to some perceived pressure, which only you are advocating for.

Indeed, I looked at M133 briefly; there mcmc quickhammered scum D1. So maybe it was just a clunky attempt to stay within his meta.

2. "surely I'd pick daychat for that?" I mean, this is WIFOM, especially the later sentence about why would you make that play. Like I said above, there's a lot of reasons scum could have come up with to push through that exile. Apparently at least mcmc thought it was worth it, and it honestly doesn't really matter if it was him alone or a team decision, because he did it, so at least 1/3 scum thought it was a good idea.
So you suggest that mcmc's decision would not have factored in his partner's/partners' position on the wagon? That seems like a fairly odd statement.

3. The entire concept of distancing from your partners is based on this principle, which isn't silly. In this paragraph, you move the goalposts from heading off the argument "oh but if one of you dies then the other can make that argument for towncred" to "Like, the occasions where you want to actively work towards getting one of your own killed as scum are already incredibly rare" in 3 sentences. Yes, the latter statement is absolutely true. You should not actively work to get your partners killed in what is likely an overwhelming majority of the time. But the former statement does not inherently mean "actively working to get your partner killed." Rather, it's "should one partner get killed, the other has a plausible argument for why they weren't partners."
I didn't derive the latter statement from the former. Both come from the actual in-game situation. You suggest that both mcmc and me were actively pushing a PR misexile. It seems clear that this would make us pretty scummy individually. Thus, I would consider it working towards getting yourself killed.

Now I'm scum for being active? Please. I hope the reasons you withheld are at least a bit more compelling than that.

Nice strawman. Being active obviously is not the same thing as driving the conversation. However, perhaps "driving town" would have been more accurate to what I meant to say than "the conversation." Other players were active, in fact more active, than yourself to this point in the game, and yet the narrative seems to have been pretty consistently around wherever you have been focused. Your role (and my own) in mathdude's exile is decently well documented. Skimming back over D2 and it feels like you were pretty much the driving force behind gkrieg's exile. Other people were pushing other wagons, but your push was the one that held sway. In some way at least then, you were the driving force behind D2.
Can you then say explicitly in which way I would have behaved differently as town? How was my behaviour "driving town" rather than just being active? Yes I pushed for an exile of someone I believed to be scum. This is good town play. I fail to see how you would expect me to behave differently.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #816 on: March 11, 2021, 07:04:34 am »

On phone so too lazy to quote, but like 2 posts ago faust says two different times some variation of “if that were the case, scum would have just picked daychat”

1. How do you know they didn’t? Seems odd to act like this is a known thing, both because it could be a scumslip and because it could be an attempt to establish this as generally believed information in order to keep us from expecting a future quixile.

2. Even if scum has daychat, if they didn’t also recruit the traitor then it would be of limited usefulness for coaching depending on who the traitor was. Remember Day 1 a lot of people thought mathdude was the traitor, so the argument faust mentioned of “why not pick daychat” wouldn’t really apply.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #817 on: March 11, 2021, 07:28:26 am »

On phone so too lazy to quote, but like 2 posts ago faust says two different times some variation of “if that were the case, scum would have just picked daychat”

1. How do you know they didn’t? Seems odd to act like this is a known thing, both because it could be a scumslip and because it could be an attempt to establish this as generally believed information in order to keep us from expecting a future quixile.

2. Even if scum has daychat, if they didn’t also recruit the traitor then it would be of limited usefulness for coaching depending on who the traitor was. Remember Day 1 a lot of people thought mathdude was the traitor, so the argument faust mentioned of “why not pick daychat” wouldn’t really apply.
1. I don't. If you look at the context of where I said this, it's about mcmc coordinating with a scumpartner (here presumably me) in order to exile mathdude. If I am the scumpartner then this coordination would have happened in thread as per my post requesting a hammer. In that particular situation, if I were scum with mcmc and we had Daychat, then there would have been no need for in-thread collusion. So in that particular scenario one might assume that we didn't pick daychat.

2. I'm not sure what argument you are trying to refute there so let's look at the two instances of where I mentioned daychat.
Yes, I could have unvoted. At the time I felt that no role that mathdude could claim would make me change my mind of wanting to exile him. I felt like he was trying to live up to ash's claim of "either PR or scum". With hindsight, I should have considered that if a newbie was scum then scum probably would have chosen Daychat and coachied him into making a better claim. Unfortunately I didn't take the time to think things through.
So yeah, this sort of reasoning is complicated by the fact that mathdude might have been the Traitor, then obviously he couldn't be coached and could still make a bad claim. I didn't want to expand on this in too much detail since really, my regrets about my D1 play didn't seem all that important. My point still holds; if I thought that the only scum mathdude could be was a Traitor then I certainly would have tried to find another exile with a bigger chance of hitting scum.

But the mcmc/faust partner theory doesn't make much sense at all. Like, if I was scum and wanted to boss around my partner(s), surely I'd pick Daychat for that?
Okay, so the theory I am referring to here, as before, is the one that Dylan outlined: that scum!me called for a scumpartner to throw down the hammer, and mcmc obliged. So if I was the Traitor then surely this wouldn't work; mcmc would have no idea that he's supposed to listen to me. And we know that mcmc wasn't the Traitor.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #818 on: March 11, 2021, 07:58:11 am »

I think I want to voted elsewhere. If only I knew where that should be...

Vote: ashersky
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #819 on: March 11, 2021, 08:01:44 am »

That’s a fair refutation.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #820 on: March 11, 2021, 06:44:54 pm »

I started a D1 & D2 re-read of Dylan last night, but then I got busy didn't have time to finish it. I realise maybe things have moved on, and there's lots more Dylan content to read now, though I've only skimmed the past day so far. I'll catch up in detail once I've posted this...

Early game vote on Mathdude, and a bunch of engagement with the concept of RVS.
Then goes on the post a bunch about stuff like the Space Gambit. It isn't too relevant to the game at that point, and isn't going to help with alignment, but on the flipside, it's getting conversation moving early on, so only really a source of scumpoints in a retrospective re-read where I'm looking for reasons Dylan might not be townie.
Ash made a post at #129 townreading MiX, Mathdude and gkrieg (and voting Joth). Dylan picked up on that in the very next post because gkrieg hadn't really said anything to warrant a change in opinion on his alignment. That's kind of a scum-hunting post, but also we now know that Ash's townreads were all good, so it's something scum would worry about. He did kind of back down at #145, after Ash gave a good response.
#146 now seems to be expressing suspicion on Joth. So now Dylan pivots from questioning Ash to joining him on putting pressure on Joth.
#152 Specific comments inviting MiX to put an EFHW case forward, which is interesting. I'm not sure whether to take it as a townie admission of lack of info, or a scummy "there's no case on EFHW" defensive case, or an alternatively-scummy challenge to MiX to build an EFHW case that scum can then utilise.
#178 Re-votes Mathdude, this time making it clear it's for a scumread rather than RVS. Though for vote count purposes, Dylan still remains the instigator of the wagon, since this was just a re-vote. However, it serves to get the thread talking about mathdude being scummy, especially because it looked like the third such vote in four posts. (For context, Mathdude had dropped a protest vote on me for low activity).
#196 Quite a long post engaging with MiX basically about why Mathdude is scummy, and why it's scummy for MiX to suggest that voting there is scummy.
#219 Responding to my post at #218, which was trying to be a gentle reminder that being a newbie here is tough because there's a big learning curve around what the community sees as scummy vs what actually necessarily comes from a scum mindset. Dylan's response was basically that too many people are willing to defend Mathdude. This could just be a totally misguided town tunnel on a newbie, but if so, Dylan's being really blinkered by not even trying to absorb the defences he's complaining that other people are putting forward.
#287 Keen to squash a possible Robz town-slip.
#289-#290 Lots of reasoning about Robz, with an undertone of worrying about what powers scum will have picked. It's too early for town to be really worrying about what's out there, but hard to say now whether his interest in scum powers is just idle curiosity or if it's because he's on the scummy side.
#365 Like MiX, Dylan claims to have jumped to a conclusion about how Mathdude must be fakeclaiming. We know MiX's was a lie, and that he didn't really think Mathdude was scum fake-claiming, but does Dylan actually believe it, or is he also lying to town in order to lock in the mixile?
#371 Hedgey defense of MiX, in encouragement of the Mathdude exile. No townpoints from me there.
#373 I'm very much not a fan of a post that starts "Wait a second" and then just piles more on the wagon instead of waiting even a fraction of a second...
#386 Weird post-hammer words to Mathdude about why he can't point to anything he did wrong, whereas before, Dylan was really pushing the "bad claim" line.

Day 2
#401: Happily jumps on the MiX wagon with me. I kind of give that townpoints, but not many.
#406: Says he originally thought Mathdude was claiming Vig, before following MiX's lead and reading traitor. We now know that MiX also read Vig initially, but deliberately didn't say so in-thread.
Quite a long absence, then a catch-up post at #555, which sounds really quite reasonable and non-scummy.
Another long absence, then a small note to the thread at #702 saying he's busy. I can definitely sympathise.
#712 Unvotes MiX, and stays not voting until EoD2, which is disappointingly non-committal, but also probably better than a bad vote if he really didn't have the capacity to engage. Slight scumbells, especially since he was watching and commenting at #760, saying he was going off a gkrieg exile, but not making any move to offer an alternative by voting anywhere else. The hammer was at #768.

Okay, so other than a couple of things D1 where you have to squint quite hard to see a scum connection, most of my scumreading of Dylan is for the Mathdude tunnel, and the way Dylan was playing into MiX's lie about Mathdude being an obvious traitor. Dylan's low-activity D2 and attitude to just letting gkrieg get exiled without voting looks a bit bad, but I have sympathy for people being busy, and overall Dylan's word-count in-thread is currently (as of post #819 when I ran my vote counter) higher than anyone other than me and faust, if you consider only still-alive players. So overall, this is not nearly as big a scumcase as I'd thought I might find.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #821 on: March 11, 2021, 06:47:38 pm »

Incidentally, in terms of engagement, the combined word counts from EFHW and Didds, who are both still alive, come to barely 1% more than Mathdude's word count, and he was exiled more than half the game ago. It would be really good to read some thoughts from those two :-)
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #822 on: March 11, 2021, 09:21:56 pm »

Apologies! I have been meaning to get here all day, but work is just bananas. But hey, guess what? I’m vaccinated! Huzzah!

I am nowhere close to really caught up but I’ve been doing the skim between meetings.

My biggest scum reads, by a large margin, are faust and EFHW. Joth and Space are my town friends.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #823 on: March 11, 2021, 09:27:56 pm »

How do people feel about posting updated popsquizes?

faust/EFHW
WCD/Space/Dylan
Joth

I feel like my current opinions group the remaining players into these groupings, which runs sort of mafia to town.  Basically, I feel strongly that ONE of faust and EFHW must be mafia given activity level, play, and reaction to me.

Space could be in that above group, or the below group, so just apply the language from those to them.

WCD and Dylan fall into the underactive, flying under the radar, but sometimes posts towny stuff pile.

Joth I think is just town from my experience reading him.

So that's that.

Hmmm....  I mostly agree with this. I have Space next to Joth, and Dylan is more hazy for me. EFHW has been my longest running scummread and faust is up there, too. 

So:
EFHW/faust
Dylan
Ash
Space/Joth
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #824 on: March 11, 2021, 11:33:43 pm »

Some random setup talk that someone will call anti-town...

We've had a single VT flip.
We've had Town RB, BG, and Vig flip.
We've had Mafia JOAT flip.

Remaining Mafia can be {Goon OR BP Goon OR Role Cop OR BP Role Cop} and {Traitor OR Goon OR BP Goon OR Role Cop OR BP Role Cop}.  Someone correct that if it is wrong.

The 5 town remaining can have any of the following configurations, and only one of these three:
0 PR/5 VT
1 PR/4 VT
2 PR/3 VT
In all cases, the PRs must be Goon Cop and/or Tracker.

Mafia definitely selected JOAT.  Of the remaining options of BP, Role Cop, Daychat, Recruit Traitor, 0 to 2 may have been selected.

I think PRs should claim, if they exist.  The only remaining town PRs must have a total of 4 results to share, with mafia having zero blocking, redirecting, or godfather powers to worry about (even if JOAT ninja shot on N1, we don't care).
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #825 on: March 12, 2021, 01:18:53 am »

Some random setup talk that someone will call anti-town...
This is anti-town! There, I did it.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #826 on: March 12, 2021, 03:48:36 am »

Hmmm....  I mostly agree with this. I have Space next to Joth, and Dylan is more hazy for me. EFHW has been my longest running scummread and faust is up there, too.
So for how long, exactly, have you had a scumread on me?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #827 on: March 12, 2021, 07:04:26 am »

I think ash is right, but I’m also not inclined to give him town points unless it turns out there actually are more PRs.

After all (non-traitor) mafia knows how many PRs we have left. If we have zero than it’s not risky at all for them to suggest a mass claim.

I had considered this already and rejected it because I thought PoE value didn’t outweigh the potential future value of the PRs, but I didn’t actually consider the fact that the remaining PRs are investigative roles with results, which I do think swings the needle.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #828 on: March 12, 2021, 07:50:59 am »

Hmmm....  I mostly agree with this. I have Space next to Joth, and Dylan is more hazy for me. EFHW has been my longest running scummread and faust is up there, too.
So for how long, exactly, have you had a scumread on me?

Since the beginning of D3. So, relatively recently.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #829 on: March 12, 2021, 08:31:44 am »

Hmmm....  I mostly agree with this. I have Space next to Joth, and Dylan is more hazy for me. EFHW has been my longest running scummread and faust is up there, too.
So for how long, exactly, have you had a scumread on me?

Since the beginning of D3. So, relatively recently.
1. What event triggered this scumread then?
2. Why did you emphasize that I'm your "longest-running" scumread if that read barely stretches back more than a few hours?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #830 on: March 12, 2021, 10:55:22 am »

Hmmm....  I mostly agree with this. I have Space next to Joth, and Dylan is more hazy for me. EFHW has been my longest running scummread and faust is up there, too.
So for how long, exactly, have you had a scumread on me?

Since the beginning of D3. So, relatively recently.
1. What event triggered this scumread then?
2. Why did you emphasize that I'm your "longest-running" scumread if that read barely stretches back more than a few hours?

Hi! (I have finished grading so I am positively giddy!)

1.The trigger was the way the gkrieg exile went down, and then your response to it at the beginning of this day. There has been some tension between you and Space this game that I am seeing through the gkrieg exile, as well.
 
2. That must have been an editing error.  EFHW is my longest running scumread by a significant margin.  You are my only other one, so I guest long-running in comparison to everyone else, but not nearly as enduring as the EFHW one.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #831 on: March 12, 2021, 11:45:48 am »

1.The trigger was the way the gkrieg exile went down, and then your response to it at the beginning of this day. There has been some tension between you and Space this game that I am seeing through the gkrieg exile, as well.
Can you expand on that? What about my repsonse did you think was scummy? And why did you mention the tension with Space -  is that an indicator that I am scum? If so, why do you think so? If not, why did you mention it?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #832 on: March 12, 2021, 05:19:24 pm »

This game is significantly less active than it should be.

Request prods on Dylan and EFHW
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #833 on: March 12, 2021, 06:44:24 pm »

1.The trigger was the way the gkrieg exile went down, and then your response to it at the beginning of this day. There has been some tension between you and Space this game that I am seeing through the gkrieg exile, as well.
Can you expand on that? What about my repsonse did you think was scummy? And why did you mention the tension with Space -  is that an indicator that I am scum? If so, why do you think so? If not, why did you mention it?

I’m going to hold off on explicating the gkrieg related reasons for now. There were cocktails at supper and I’m not sure about my abilities to be clear. Also, it’s all based on my sense, not on specific passages of text (you’re far too clever for that!) so I’m wary of trying to share it.

However, the Space part of easier for me. I think you are finding one another scummy. I don’t really think that is manufactured (although I’m easily fooled) so my sense is that one of you is probably scum. Of those two, I think it’s you.

I’ll tell you what I find the most odd, though, and that is the complete lack of traction on EFHW. The only other person who was finding her genuinely scummy was gkrieg, which has shored up my belief since I know know I can trust his read completely. Ash has her on his scummy list, but no one else is even seriously entertaining her as scum. I am perplexed.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #834 on: March 12, 2021, 10:24:42 pm »

I tend to agree that one of faust/Space is mafia.

EFHW works well as partner to either faust or Space, too.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #835 on: March 13, 2021, 12:26:34 am »

Vote Count 3.2:

Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, SpaceAnenome, EFHW, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time.


*prods issued to EFHW and Dylan32
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #836 on: March 13, 2021, 02:30:53 am »

However, the Space part of easier for me. I think you are finding one another scummy. I don’t really think that is manufactured (although I’m easily fooled) so my sense is that one of you is probably scum. Of those two, I think it’s you.
I don't understand. You think the scumreads aren't manufactured, but if one of us were scum, then by definition their scumread on the other would be manufactured. So I'm completely at a loss to understand what you mean here. One of us is town, and we're infallible, therefore the other must be scum? That is not a particularly good argument there.

Also, I'm not really scumreading Space anymore.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #837 on: March 13, 2021, 07:46:06 am »

Sorry! Spent yesterday on vca. Would vote ash or Didds. Will elaborate when not on phone.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #838 on: March 13, 2021, 08:43:32 am »

Due to RL stuff, I will be less and less available through the rest of the day. 

The game has reached that point where we are basically guessing.  As such, players that have produced content just become easier targets.  If exiling me helps the game, I'm all for it.

I guess I'd just ask the town players who want to vote for me to think about how they play the rest of the game after I flip town.  I'm not saying that keeps you from voting for me, but I think it's important to consider follow-on stuff.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #839 on: March 13, 2021, 08:47:42 am »

Does anyone else want to weigh in on ash’s mass claim idea?

A simple yea or nay would suffice.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #840 on: March 13, 2021, 10:27:15 am »

nay
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #841 on: March 13, 2021, 11:37:37 am »

Does anyone else want to weigh in on ash’s mass claim idea?

A simple yea or nay would suffice.

Nay. Town PRs can pick when to claim based on their best judgment. There's no town role that has to be out there, so that limits logically finding scum/ICs.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #842 on: March 13, 2021, 11:46:02 am »

My dilemma about ashersky: I found him scummy for 1. making the argument that kept the mathdude wagon alive (that math knew he wouldn't die at night) and 2. creating chaos with the Day 2 counterclaim.

On reflection, however, there was a good chance town would just exile him based on the counterclaim. I think the main reason we didn't was because it seems too unconvincing to have been made by scum. Now we hear he was rebelling against faust. Been there, done that! So to have been scum, ashersky would have had to make a weak claim to avoid getting exiled in order to create chaos and without the likelihood of exiling MiX, who had a strong claim.

So, I'm putting ash in my town bucket and leaving him there (I hope).
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #843 on: March 13, 2021, 12:08:41 pm »

However, the Space part of easier for me. I think you are finding one another scummy. I don’t really think that is manufactured (although I’m easily fooled) so my sense is that one of you is probably scum. Of those two, I think it’s you.
I don't understand. You think the scumreads aren't manufactured, but if one of us were scum, then by definition their scumread on the other would be manufactured. So I'm completely at a loss to understand what you mean here. One of us is town, and we're infallible, therefore the other must be scum? That is not a particularly good argument there.

Also, I'm not really scumreading Space anymore.

I agree this is odd.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #844 on: March 13, 2021, 12:12:40 pm »

Regarding Dylan, I wanted to scumread him because I wanted to have less uncertainty in my life. Alas, I'm really not sure. Waiting to hear his promised case on faust.

vote: Didds
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #845 on: March 13, 2021, 12:25:30 pm »

If we don’t mass claim, and there are no more PRs, (non-traitor) scum is basically 100% safe to claim at E-1 and to know there won’t be a counterclaim.

So I just want to say for the record, if you are an investigative PR, use your judgement. But don’t expect your claim to save you at E-1 because I’m extremely unlikely to believe a claim under those circumstances.

And that’s all the more I have to say about claims.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #846 on: March 13, 2021, 05:46:26 pm »

My dilemma about ashersky: I found him scummy for 1. making the argument that kept the mathdude wagon alive (that math knew he wouldn't die at night) and 2. creating chaos with the Day 2 counterclaim.

On reflection, however, there was a good chance town would just exile him based on the counterclaim. I think the main reason we didn't was because it seems too unconvincing to have been made by scum. Now we hear he was rebelling against faust. Been there, done that! So to have been scum, ashersky would have had to make a weak claim to avoid getting exiled in order to create chaos and without the likelihood of exiling MiX, who had a strong claim.

So, I'm putting ash in my town bucket and leaving him there (I hope).
I don't know. The issue with ash is that everything he did is like 100% textbook ash. He follows his meta precisely. The counterclaim thing came just when I began finding it odd that ash had not yet done something outlandish that annoyed me. And "There was a good chance town would exile him" is just as good a reason for town!ash not to make that claim as it is for scum!ash.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #847 on: March 13, 2021, 05:51:05 pm »

I'm trying hard to read EFHW as scum because I know that from how votes and wagons went down she's a reasonable candidate, but whenever she comes back and posts it just screams town to me.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #848 on: March 13, 2021, 06:24:52 pm »

Hey, sorry, I'm still here. I'm trying to make some last minute travel plans, so I'm going to be V/LA for the next week, but I will still have internet. I'll be on a plane for a few hours tomorrow though.

I say nay to the massclaim, though if a PR has results that would impact today, they should probably claim.

To EFHW asking about my faust case, the more I've thought about it, the less sure I am that it's a solid case. A lot of it for me is gut read, thinking through scum narratives for people's play so far, and PoE thinking the faust vs Space stuff didn't sound town v town to me. I'll see if there's a better case, but I'm not sure.

EFHW's comment about me seems strange to me. Like it's trying to consolidate towards a more acceptable exile for today, but keeping enough doubt on me to keep it viable to return to the manufactured scumread later. That or it's just legit doubt, idk.  I would like to hear the vca that they said they'd elaborate on when not on mobile.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #849 on: March 13, 2021, 10:30:31 pm »

Maybe mafia can agree to give up their evil ways and join the forces of good, and we just all win?

No one is feeling very sure of their reads (me included). 

Not that it's a good idea anyway, but even no exile is annoyingly ineffective.  It's an odd early spot where it makes strategic sense for mafia to NK to cause/continue further confusion.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #850 on: March 14, 2021, 05:10:42 am »

Vote: Didds
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #851 on: March 14, 2021, 09:18:11 am »

Sorry, yesterday completely got away from me! I did see another human being in person (outside, socially distanced, legal in the UK) for a little while, though, so I'm slightly more human again now than I had been :-)

I think Joth is making sense about warning PRs not to trust in getting saved at E-1, but we also have to remember that investigative results could massively help un-stall the game since it feels like town is struggling now. A PR who's sitting on a bunch of null results, or doesn't have anything useful on live players, may really be better off staying quiet and hoping to hit good info now that the pool is narrowing.

More stuff incoming in a little while, but I need to mix screen time with a lot of chores today..
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #852 on: March 14, 2021, 09:51:55 am »

Alrighty then, vote: faust

I am visiting my kid at her college today and tomorrow (College?!? Gah!). I won’t be around much until the evening (forum time). I’m willing to vote for EFHW or faust. The fact that they are both voting for me, when I know I’m not scum, solidifies for me that at least one of them is a baddie. If y’all exile me while I’m busy, remember that, okay?

Boo on chores, Space. Hooray for real life other persons! And hooray Dylan for travel! I was on a plane yesterday and it was entirely too crowded but everyone was wearing masks and I realized it’s going to take me a long time to feel safe being close to other people again. I hope the process goes smoothly for you. Also, hooray for the big work project going well. Ashersky, I’ve been thinking about you and your family add sweet Tobi. My heart breaks for you.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #853 on: March 14, 2021, 10:34:33 am »

@Didds, thank you.  It's been so crazy busy otherwise that my mind has been on other things.  The dog lived a long, long time and had a good life, and his suffering ended, so I'm focusing on the positives.

In addition to joth's warning about E-1 claims not saving the claimant, I think it's worth remembering that mafia who know the setup is now safe to fakeclaim at will can also fakeclaim null results on a partner to protect them with slight evidence, such as "well, I tracked X and they did not take any actions last night" sorts of stuff.  It doesn't clear them, but adds a data point.

I would say that everyone getting a popsquiz down during this day would be useful information for all, so it seems anti-town not to do it.  I know some players have not posted one.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #854 on: March 14, 2021, 12:31:59 pm »

Vote Count 3.3:

Ashersky (1): Joth
WCD (2): EFHW, faust
faust (1): WCD
Not Voting (3):  SpaceAnenome, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time.

*Phone Vote Count.
** DL in a little over a day
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #855 on: March 14, 2021, 01:03:03 pm »

Have I posted one?

town: me, Space, faust
meh: Didds, EFHW, Dylan
scum: ash

those are in order from towniest to scummiest. I wouldn't be sad to vote from the middle category to get an exile. In fact it's looking like I probably will have to do just that.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #856 on: March 14, 2021, 05:29:53 pm »

EFHW's comment about me seems strange to me. Like it's trying to consolidate towards a more acceptable exile for today, but keeping enough doubt on me to keep it viable to return to the manufactured scumread later. That or it's just legit doubt, idk.  I would like to hear the vca that they said they'd elaborate on when not on mobile.

The elaboration was going to be the reads on you and ash. I didn't find anything in the vca that hasn't already been mentioned.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #857 on: March 14, 2021, 07:46:45 pm »

I’m going to switch to vote: EFHW.

I still think faust is scummy, but EFHWs last post is the latest that creates the appearance of engagement without actually advancing a case. More proof, her case in me.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #858 on: March 14, 2021, 08:31:27 pm »

Things I've found a bit scummy/off about faust this game. Some are minor, but they add together.

First, there was his fishing around for a MiX wagon in D1 while not actually voting MiX because he wanted to sit on Mathdude. I called him on it at the time, so you can see the exchange a bit at #256, though faust doesn't explain why he's set on Mathdude over MiX.

I kind of felt that faust wasn't really scumhunting, but rather was reacting to what the rest of town would go with, both in probing who would go for what wagon, and in not really engaging properly with my question about whether Robz was a better alternative-wagon target than MiX. I don't think faust ever went back and addressed my question at #277, though this one is more minor, because with both this and the earlier point about the MiX wagon, MiX was taking it upon himself to answer all the questions for other people, so that gave faust plenty of cover/excuse for not saying anything at the time.

Faust seconding MiX's "Intent to make someone hammer math" post felt super-scummy to me, because I think faust is someone who should absolutely have been arguing for doing something sensible with the claims.

Faust made a "Pfft" comment to MiX when he said I was locktown. I could feel some omgus offence here, but I don't actually think it's contributing much to me read on faust. Worth noting that he did want to discredit my prob-town status, though.

Faust pushes quite a safe line of asking what d2 MiX voters thought was going on at the end of d1. It's another example of fishing for other people to make cases, or to say things he can them safely pick at, because scum knows that MiX isn't mafia. This starts at #415, and continues at #435, #437, and kind of also at #447, where he's using the fact that gkrieg hasn't engaged with it to justify not saying anything more about his vote on gkrieg.

#431 is the first time in a while that faust answers a direct question from me. I was still very frustrated at MiX for playing so chaotically and rushing through the EoD1, but of course scum!faust would already know that it's safe to fence with me over my puching the MiX wagon, because from scum's point of view it's a fine and obvious wagon for town to push.

#473 is a continuation of faust's "how does MiX make sense as scum" line, but calling it a game intervention. However, he's changing nothing in the game, nor pointing anything in a new direction. This kind of feels like he's making the game stall because he's focusing everyone's attention on an irrelevant question. And as I've said before, I think scum wants to keep a chaotic MiX around for the misfires. (Joth later points out this same thing, and I quote it and build on it at #512).

At #500 faust calls me scum for being "very illogcal" in the pursuit of the MiX wagon. Obviously I disagree, and we've heard since that MiX honestly was trying to lie to the thread and push through a ridiculous exile just because he felt threatened as a PR, so I think my read on him and criticism of anti-town play was justified.

#501 really starts the alarm bells, because faust scumreads me for not looking at wagons, when I absolutely considered it and reasoned very logically that it was not useful to do so because the EoD1 was such a mess with so many people incorrectly supporting a terrible newbie exile. I put my reasoning at #513, and I don't think faust ever came back to exlain why my points would be invalid. Instead he does make a quote-less post at #516 kind of throwing his hands up and saying that there was no reason for the whole scumteam to be behind the bad mixile, but importantly he doesn't actually engage with the things I've said. For me, this is very unsatisfying, because he's claimed a scumread, I've made a comment, and then he never acknowledges the validity of what I've said back to the thread again, so that feels quite scummy to me, because I know there are other players in-thread who aren't going to logic their way through these things for themselves, and are going to be looking out for acceptance cues from faust, so the fact they're not there is a problem.

There's a bunch of talk of setup around the #600 mark. Again, it's an easy thing to engage in and try to score townpoints for as scum, but scum are going to have asked questions ahead of time in their QT, so I don't think it's worth townpoints, but it is a good way for scum to keep the conversation away from definite scumhunting.

#626 faust is back on the "there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon" line, without having engaged in the conversation I'd tried to have with him about why I don't think that's necessarily true in this case. It's notable that now he's only trying to convince Didds of this, though. I really think this feels like someone who knows all the scum were on-wagon pushing a line that there has to be an off-wagon scum in order to confuse town into voting for each other.

I don't like the tone of faust's response to gkrieg at #661. It just doesn't feel townie to push such a tenuous line as the "one scum off-wagon" thing I'm already arguing against, and come out with "This is ridiculous" when gkrieg also replies that the way the exile went down was fast and all scum could absolutely have ended the day on the Mathdude wagon.

The faust engages quite happily with joth on the topic of policy votes, which again is a safe topic for scum, because we're literally talking about voting townies whose play bothers other townies, and of course scum have to love that.

Faust sounds quite excited to be lining up the gkrieg exile at #736, and makes it clear that he's leaving it there at #747 and going to be gone till after the D2 deadline.

Okay, I was going to do a complete re-read of faust and also find all the places where I felt I'd asked relevant questions or made relevant responses and then he'd just totally avoided engaging with them, but it's late now, so I'll have to leave that. Still, I think overall it's enough for me to be more confident on a faust case than I've been able to feel on any other person I've tried doing a case-making read-through on, so:

Vote: faust
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #859 on: March 14, 2021, 08:33:49 pm »

Eep, sorry, I meant to just preview that post, check the links, run the spell-checking, re-read my words and all that stuff, but tired me clicked on "post" instead of "preview" :-(

I hope it's not too terrible! I really need to get to bed now though...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #860 on: March 14, 2021, 08:38:13 pm »

Eep, sorry, I meant to just preview that post, check the links, run the spell-checking, re-read my words and all that stuff, but tired me clicked on "post" instead of "preview" :-(

I hope it's not too terrible! I really need to get to bed now though...

 I worries! That was a heap of work! Thank you!

I already agree with you, and I think Dylan and Ash do too. But Joth has faust is his towniest tier...
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #861 on: March 14, 2021, 09:22:44 pm »

I already agree with you, and I think Dylan and Ash do too. But Joth has faust is his towniest tier...

I think this sort of spread makes sense.  If faust is mafia, he has a partner of some sort.  Plus, people will just be wrong in their reads one way or the other.  So I guess I'm just pointing out that this specific thing shouldn't affect your own read.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #862 on: March 15, 2021, 12:53:29 am »

Vote Count 3.4:

WCD (2): EFHW, faust
Ashersky (1): Joth
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): Ashersky, Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time - That is in under 24 hours!

*Proper Vote Count
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #863 on: March 15, 2021, 01:04:19 am »

I'm starting to get suspicious of Dylan.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #864 on: March 15, 2021, 04:20:54 am »

I'll deal with Space's case. It all seems quite bias-ridden, and i'm not sure this will be convincing them, but I wouldn't do my job if I didn't try.

First, there was his fishing around for a MiX wagon in D1 while not actually voting MiX because he wanted to sit on Mathdude. I called him on it at the time, so you can see the exchange a bit at #256, though faust doesn't explain why he's set on Mathdude over MiX.
I'm very confused; the very post you linked to is where I explained why I didn't want to leave the mathdude wagon, so how can you at the same time claim I gave no explanation?

I kind of felt that faust wasn't really scumhunting, but rather was reacting to what the rest of town would go with, both in probing who would go for what wagon, and in not really engaging properly with my question about whether Robz was a better alternative-wagon target than MiX. I don't think faust ever went back and addressed my question at #277, though this one is more minor, because with both this and the earlier point about the MiX wagon, MiX was taking it upon himself to answer all the questions for other people, so that gave faust plenty of cover/excuse for not saying anything at the time.
The question in that post seems rhetorical to me. Sorry if you meant it as a genuine question.

Faust seconding MiX's "Intent to make someone hammer math" post felt super-scummy to me, because I think faust is someone who should absolutely have been arguing for doing something sensible with the claims.
What do you mean "doing something sensible"? I thought mathdude was scum regardless of the actual role he would claim; in such a position, what do you think I should have done?

Faust pushes quite a safe line of asking what d2 MiX voters thought was going on at the end of d1. It's another example of fishing for other people to make cases, or to say things he can them safely pick at, because scum knows that MiX isn't mafia. This starts at #415, and continues at #435, #437, and kind of also at #447, where he's using the fact that gkrieg hasn't engaged with it to justify not saying anything more about his vote on gkrieg.
This is what I do. You know my meta, so I'm not sure what this is even doing here. I thought the MiX votes were off and figured that if people gave their reasoning then it would be easier to pinpoint the scum among them. Again, can you explain what you think town!me would have done instead?

#431 is the first time in a while that faust answers a direct question from me. I was still very frustrated at MiX for playing so chaotically and rushing through the EoD1, but of course scum!faust would already know that it's safe to fence with me over my puching the MiX wagon, because from scum's point of view it's a fine and obvious wagon for town to push.
This is pure bias. There is no hint of an argument in here. You can put a scum narrative in anything; defending town, pushing town, defending scum, pushing scum. Without an explanation of why this is something that I would do as scum but not as town, this is worthless.

#473 is a continuation of faust's "how does MiX make sense as scum" line, but calling it a game intervention. However, he's changing nothing in the game, nor pointing anything in a new direction. This kind of feels like he's making the game stall because he's focusing everyone's attention on an irrelevant question. And as I've said before, I think scum wants to keep a chaotic MiX around for the misfires. (Joth later points out this same thing, and I quote it and build on it at #512).
I'm confused again. Now the question of whether a player is scum or not is irrelevant? Are we even playing the same game?

#501 really starts the alarm bells, because faust scumreads me for not looking at wagons, when I absolutely considered it and reasoned very logically that it was not useful to do so because the EoD1 was such a mess with so many people incorrectly supporting a terrible newbie exile. I put my reasoning at #513, and I don't think faust ever came back to exlain why my points would be invalid. Instead he does make a quote-less post at #516 kind of throwing his hands up and saying that there was no reason for the whole scumteam to be behind the bad mixile, but importantly he doesn't actually engage with the things I've said. For me, this is very unsatisfying, because he's claimed a scumread, I've made a comment, and then he never acknowledges the validity of what I've said back to the thread again, so that feels quite scummy to me, because I know there are other players in-thread who aren't going to logic their way through these things for themselves, and are going to be looking out for acceptance cues from faust, so the fact they're not there is a problem.
I feel like this gets to the core of things. Space is "unsatisfied" with my play and then concludes that this must mean I'm scum. Now I understand being unsatisfied with my play; I have the same feeling. I guess it is kind of a compliment that you think I couldn't play badly as town, but it is unfortunately incorrect.

I don't think I deserve the particular criticism in here though. Let's look a bit at the post #513 that you think I should have responded to:
[...]
Is that the kind of post you're trying to accuse me of not having made, or do you just need the one-scum-in-this-pool sort of predictions I sometimes make, so that then you can accuse me of being scummy for assuming or not assuming where the potential traitor fits in, since those are a lot harder to deduce well when we don't even know if all the scumteam are aware of each other?

Vote:  faust
It ends with a (again presumed rhetorical) question that to me reads like you accuse me that I would scumread you no matter what you did. At that point I don't think you will read anything I post in good faith. I did not pursue this because to me it looked futile; you were not going to listen to anything I say.

There's a bunch of talk of setup around the #600 mark. Again, it's an easy thing to engage in and try to score townpoints for as scum, but scum are going to have asked questions ahead of time in their QT, so I don't think it's worth townpoints, but it is a good way for scum to keep the conversation away from definite scumhunting.
The faust engages quite happily with joth on the topic of policy votes, which again is a safe topic for scum, because we're literally talking about voting townies whose play bothers other townies, and of course scum have to love that.
These are both just annoying because they presume that I wasn't doing scumhunting, but at the same time you acknwoledge that I was pushing for the gkrieg exile. It's like, these might be scummy if they were the only thing I did, but they're not, so this just reads like you picking more things to feed into your bias.

#626 faust is back on the "there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon" line, without having engaged in the conversation I'd tried to have with him about why I don't think that's necessarily true in this case. It's notable that now he's only trying to convince Didds of this, though. I really think this feels like someone who knows all the scum were on-wagon pushing a line that there has to be an off-wagon scum in order to confuse town into voting for each other.

I don't like the tone of faust's response to gkrieg at #661. It just doesn't feel townie to push such a tenuous line as the "one scum off-wagon" thing I'm already arguing against, and come out with "This is ridiculous" when gkrieg also replies that the way the exile went down was fast and all scum could absolutely have ended the day on the Mathdude wagon.
Not sure what else I'm supposed to say to that; you think it's bad to be looking off-wagon, and I disagree. You might have a stronger case here if another on-wagon player flipped non-Traitor scum, but right now this is all just conjecture.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #865 on: March 15, 2021, 04:29:49 am »

@Didds, are you planning to respond to this at some point?
However, the Space part of easier for me. I think you are finding one another scummy. I don’t really think that is manufactured (although I’m easily fooled) so my sense is that one of you is probably scum. Of those two, I think it’s you.
I don't understand. You think the scumreads aren't manufactured, but if one of us were scum, then by definition their scumread on the other would be manufactured. So I'm completely at a loss to understand what you mean here. One of us is town, and we're infallible, therefore the other must be scum? That is not a particularly good argument there.

Also, I'm not really scumreading Space anymore.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #866 on: March 15, 2021, 04:30:40 am »

Also, are we going to hear about this at some point?
I’m going to hold off on explicating the gkrieg related reasons for now.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #867 on: March 15, 2021, 04:36:04 am »

Vote: ashersky

Roughly once every 30 minutes I convince myself that one of Didds/ash is scummier than the other.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #868 on: March 15, 2021, 04:38:31 am »

But I'll post a poppy quizzy thing to satiate ashersky. I think I've already expressed all these reads here so it doesn't hurt to condense them.

Town: joth, EFHW, Space
Meh: Dylan
Scum: Didds, ash
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #869 on: March 15, 2021, 04:43:39 am »

I'm starting to get suspicious of Dylan.
Like this post just reads to me like: "Okay, the faust exile is well on track, Dylan is probably going to come in late to drop a hammer, so it's good to lay some groundwork for the final misexile."

Or why else would dylan just now start to become suspicious? He didn't do anything.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #870 on: March 15, 2021, 08:28:03 am »

I'm starting to get suspicious of Dylan.
Like this post just reads to me like: "Okay, the faust exile is well on track, Dylan is probably going to come in late to drop a hammer, so it's good to lay some groundwork for the final misexile."

Or why else would dylan just now start to become suspicious? He didn't do anything.

You thinking the faust exile is well on track is the biggest reason we should exile you.  Classic overreaction by somewhat pressured mafia.

On a side note, I knew posting that thought about Dylan without an explanation would raise some hackles.  Honestly, what triggered me to write it was seeing his name in the vote count as not voting.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #871 on: March 15, 2021, 08:50:03 am »

I'm busy at work today, so this is just a quick lunchtime check-in. I may have time around 3-3.30pm forum time to return, then 5pm onwards.

Oh, also it may be worth noting for the non-US people that US clocks changed yesterday. The spacing between forum time and local time is an hour less than normal for me, until the UK clocks move on the 28th.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #872 on: March 15, 2021, 09:02:41 am »

I'm starting to get suspicious of Dylan.
Like this post just reads to me like: "Okay, the faust exile is well on track, Dylan is probably going to come in late to drop a hammer, so it's good to lay some groundwork for the final misexile."

Or why else would dylan just now start to become suspicious? He didn't do anything.

You thinking the faust exile is well on track is the biggest reason we should exile you.  Classic overreaction by somewhat pressured mafia.

On a side note, I knew posting that thought about Dylan without an explanation would raise some hackles.  Honestly, what triggered me to write it was seeing his name in the vote count as not voting.
I'm starting to get suspicious of ashersky.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #873 on: March 15, 2021, 09:04:27 am »

Also, I wasn't saying that I think that the faust exile is well on track, I was merely expressing your supposed thought process.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #874 on: March 15, 2021, 09:07:11 am »

One more because I need to get this off my chest: It's hilarious how ashersky, well known for consistently overreacting to pressure as town, somehow thinks that that's a scumtell.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #875 on: March 15, 2021, 09:11:20 am »

I’m going to switch to vote: EFHW.

I still think faust is scummy, but EFHWs last post is the latest that creates the appearance of engagement without actually advancing a case. More proof, her case in me.

You haven't done much except tunnel me, without a case other than low activity.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #876 on: March 15, 2021, 09:12:16 am »

I'm starting to get suspicious of ashersky.

Starting?

But I'll post a poppy quizzy thing to satiate ashersky. I think I've already expressed all these reads here so it doesn't hurt to condense them.

Town: joth, EFHW, Space
Meh: Dylan
Scum: Didds, ash
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #877 on: March 15, 2021, 09:16:00 am »

@Didds, are you planning to respond to this at some point?
However, the Space part of easier for me. I think you are finding one another scummy. I don’t really think that is manufactured (although I’m easily fooled) so my sense is that one of you is probably scum. Of those two, I think it’s you.
I don't understand. You think the scumreads aren't manufactured, but if one of us were scum, then by definition their scumread on the other would be manufactured. So I'm completely at a loss to understand what you mean here. One of us is town, and we're infallible, therefore the other must be scum? That is not a particularly good argument there.

Also, I'm not really scumreading Space anymore.

Apologies... I missed this earlier. I was saying that I don’t think you’re scumreads were both manufactured, as in the fake fights that we’ve seen (or at least suspected) from other folks in other games. So, I think one of you is probably actually scum and trying to paint the other that way, and one of you is town and making a real case.

It is, for sure, not a very good argument and I am not trying to convince anyone with it. Rather it is helping me distinguish between pairs. Based on this, I don’t think that you and space are working together so thinking though it helped me set you both on my scum/chum continuum.

The fact that you are no longer scumreading Space seems more opportunistic than not since they are on most folks town list.

As for the gkrieg comment, space articulated it to a large extent in her long post. From my perspective you went from “we should look off wagon., there’s scum there for sure!”, to being instrumental in the gkrieg exile, to fizzling out on that argument entirely when gkrieg flipped town without any real explanation or introspection. If you’re scum, then you accomplished your objective, diverted suspicion and got a town exile off.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #878 on: March 15, 2021, 09:18:10 am »

I’m going to switch to vote: EFHW.

I still think faust is scummy, but EFHWs last post is the latest that creates the appearance of engagement without actually advancing a case. More proof, her case in me.

You haven't done much except tunnel me, without a case other than low activity.

You’re right that it has been a tunnel, but it isn’t based on low activity. I’ve been low myself. Rather it’s on the type of activity. I don’t see you do any of the things you normally do to scum hunt, like analyze folks in relation to one another or ask questions that move us forward. This was the point that gkrieg also made, just before he got exiled.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #879 on: March 15, 2021, 09:31:29 am »

I'll be asleep at deadline.

I'll vote: faust
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #880 on: March 15, 2021, 09:31:57 am »

faust using the word "hilarious" is a mafiatell.  It's alignment-indicative for him.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #881 on: March 15, 2021, 10:27:12 am »

I'm starting to get suspicious of ashersky.

Starting?
Oh it was a joke (admittedly cryptic). ashersky said that he posted "I'm starting to get suspicious of Dylan" because Dylan was not voting, but ashersky isn't voting either, so I posted the thing back at him.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #882 on: March 15, 2021, 10:30:38 am »

faust using the word "hilarious" is a mafiatell.  It's alignment-indicative for him.
That's hilarious!
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #883 on: March 15, 2021, 10:46:52 am »

Unofficial VC

WCD (1): EFHW
Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
faust (2): SpaceAnenome, ashersky
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (2): Dylan32

Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #884 on: March 15, 2021, 10:54:43 am »

joth - you've been all about mass claim and ashersky today. Thoughts on other topics?
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #885 on: March 15, 2021, 12:02:53 pm »

Space, what do you think about Ashersky?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #886 on: March 15, 2021, 01:18:52 pm »

joth - you've been all about mass claim and ashersky today. Thoughts on other topics?

faust is just reading very town to me, as is Space. I find you and Didds hard to read. I would appreciate more activity from Dylan, but when he does post it's good stuff and not especially pinging me.

Idk, I'm starting to feel like we have "sit back and let the town destroy itself" scum, so my tendency is to see who's been sitting back the hardest. That's part of why I figure there's probably 1 scum in {EFHW, Didds, Dylan}.

Anyway, that's why I've sort of settled into this tunnel on ash. I have scumread him for various things throughout the game and he's playing in a way that doesn't feel consistent with his town meta as I remember it (whereas faust's play does feel consistent to me).

If I were to move to another wagon at this point it would probably be Didds, not because I'm scumreading her but because I never scumread her, which makes me think she's more likely to be scum in a game where I'm not finding anyone else super-scummy.

I wish Dylan would put a vote down or express some reads; would really help us sort out what's feasible today.

I'd love to do some serious re-reading but I doubt I'll have time before deadline.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #887 on: March 15, 2021, 02:34:36 pm »

Space - I'm having trouble following your case on faust. Could you tl;dr it for me?
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #888 on: March 15, 2021, 02:56:09 pm »

Vote Count 3.5:

Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
faust (2): SpaceAnenome, Ashersky
WCD (1): EFHW
EFHW (1): WestCoastDidds
Not Voting (1): Dylan32


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 3 starts now and ends Monday, March 15th at 6:30pm Forum Time - That is in roughly 3 hours!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #889 on: March 15, 2021, 04:08:44 pm »

I already posted all my reads in an earlier post, just not in a condensed for like everyone else. I just went to type out the short version of it from memory and realized that since then I had moved EFHW from the scummier bucket to meh, and faust was the only person in the scum bucket today. Space and joth are town, everyone else is varying shades of meh that I would probably vote for in order to get an exile through, in the order EFHW, Ash, Didds from most to less desire to exile.

Vote: faust
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #890 on: March 15, 2021, 04:09:00 pm »

E-1 on faust
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #891 on: March 15, 2021, 04:16:33 pm »

I can hammer faust. I’ll check back in an hour!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #892 on: March 15, 2021, 04:25:21 pm »

I'm the Tracker.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #893 on: March 15, 2021, 04:27:10 pm »

I tracked Didds N1 and Space N2. Got a non-incriminating result each time.

If you have time you can go check. People already pointed out that I moved away from my "scum off-wagon" theory and scumread on Space today. This is why.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #894 on: March 15, 2021, 04:29:03 pm »

ash is extra scummy for the whole massclaim suggestion. He wanted to flush out the remaining investigative role(s).
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #895 on: March 15, 2021, 04:29:46 pm »

I'm the Tracker.

So I just want to say for the record, if you are an investigative PR, use your judgement. But don’t expect your claim to save you at E-1 because I’m extremely unlikely to believe a claim under those circumstances.

That said I would love to exile someone else today. Just not because of this claim.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #896 on: March 15, 2021, 04:32:25 pm »

So I just want to say for the record, if you are an investigative PR, use your judgement. But don’t expect your claim to save you at E-1 because I’m extremely unlikely to believe a claim under those circumstances.
I mean, I don't expect it, or I would have claimed earlier. But the information should get out before I die at least.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #897 on: March 15, 2021, 04:34:09 pm »

faust is also correct that ash's mass claim suggestion is scummier if faust turns out to be telling the truth.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #898 on: March 15, 2021, 04:43:01 pm »

And with that I have to go. Might pop in later but don't count on it.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #899 on: March 15, 2021, 04:43:35 pm »

Talk to me, Joth. Exile faust or no?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #900 on: March 15, 2021, 04:54:34 pm »

Talk to me, Joth. Exile faust or no?

I don't think we're going to find scum there. But I could be wrong. Idk, the claim is a bit sus.

I'd still prefer ash if we have the votes.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #901 on: March 15, 2021, 04:56:51 pm »

No exile?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #902 on: March 15, 2021, 04:58:58 pm »

I’d like to get Spaces take on this
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #903 on: March 15, 2021, 05:07:05 pm »

Wow, there's lots to catch up on. I have two tabs with half-written cases on faust (one response to faust's reply on my post, one tl;dr for EFHW that still wasn't short enough to get out before my family call. Seems like the game has moved on in between thought.

Unvote for now while I process.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #904 on: March 15, 2021, 05:13:25 pm »

How much would tracker!faust trust a null result on someone he tracks? Traitor would be negative under a tracker, because they don't target. So if we have a traitor, he's only clearing me and Didds as far as not being active mafia.

If we're in a recruiting situation, then we know town has at least four PRs: recruiting the traitor gives one extra (over the baseline of two), and mcmc being joat gives another. Do we think scum has a third, and if so that it's a targeting role such that every scum would be expected to take a targetable night action? I'm unconvinced by that, so again, I think tracker!faust shouldn't have very big townreads based on null tracking results.

Does that seem sensible to the rest of you?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #905 on: March 15, 2021, 05:15:01 pm »

No exile?

That's a cop-out for town, and essentially just gives scum a second night kill in a row, so let's not do that unless there's no other choice. Even exiling faust, given that we've all been asked to give opinions on him, may be preferable to a no-exile, unless his claim is super-convincing to the rest of you, rather than just looking like the most convenient thing scum!faust has to claim to confuse town.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #906 on: March 15, 2021, 05:17:15 pm »

It’s not my preference, but I did t know if anyone else was around
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #907 on: March 15, 2021, 05:18:25 pm »

Space - I'm having trouble following your case on faust. Could you tl;dr it for me?

Actually coming back to finishing this tl;dr is maybe useful:

Really briefly:
a. The EoD1 push on Mathdude, seconding MiX's call to hammer Mathdude was scummy. Sensible faust ought to have waited and seen what information came out with the claims.
b. He's been pushing a "one scum off-wagon" line that was a major part of his gkrieg case and also justification for pushing Didds. I've been asking why that's necessarily the case, and he has never stated clearly why he thinks scum couldn't all have been on the kind-of-inevitable slow-growing Mathdude wagon.
c. I've asked a bunch of questions directly to him that he's side-stepped asking. He's called at least two of them "rhetorical", and another more direct less-rhetorical-sounding one is hidden in the text he cut out under a "..." in his big long reply to me.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #908 on: March 15, 2021, 05:25:04 pm »

Faust, you said that you'd prefer we don't exile either of MiX or Ash.  Is there any reason why that you can share right now?
But also, there is like for sure scum off the mathdude wagon, yes? Scum doesn't just pile all of their resources onto a terrible-looking misexile?

The only unflipped people there are you, gkrieg, Space. So assuming you are town, you should believe that there is scum to find here, and I think you townread Space.

Here's an example of a post from faust in d2 that really seems scummy to me. I totally disagree that there is "for sure scum off the mathdude wagon", and faust hasn't yet made any case for why it "for sure" has to be so. But he's using it to try to push Didds into voting for someone on that wagon.

Compare to this, where early in d3 he uses the same argument again to push the suggestion that now we've had a gkrieg town flip, maybe that necessary off-wagonscum is Didds again, even though in his tracker claim he said that getting a null result on Didds n1 and me n2 made him move his scumreads elsewhere:

faust, your argument that appealed to me yesterday was that it was likely that at least one scum was off the mathdude wagon.  It wasn't gkrieg, and I know it wasn't me.  That leaves Space.

How are you feeling about them?
Looking back at things, I don't quite think Space makes a lot of sense as mcmc's partner. I guess if they're the Traitor the case might be stronger? But I'm not interested in a Space exile today. If we're looking off-wagon, I prefer you.

Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #909 on: March 15, 2021, 05:30:50 pm »

So yeah, it feels like I am still scumreading faust. I think exactly as joth says, we shouldn't believe an E-1 claim that scum would make to try to save their skin.

I don't agree that faust should be taking null tracker results as so non-incriminating to move a scumread, especially since that post I quoted above implies he's happy still to have a scumread on Didds with an identical result.

There's also no mention in the clarifications after his claim of the possibility that a traitor would necessarily also give a "non-incriminating result"... which makes it feel like a fake-claim and not an actual result.

Vote: faust
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #910 on: March 15, 2021, 05:40:14 pm »

Okay... vote: faust
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #911 on: March 15, 2021, 05:43:02 pm »

I never actually did one of those scum-to-chum posts:

scummy: faust
in between: Dylan, Didds, EFHW
townie: joth, ash, Space

I thought EFHW looked like the most likely partner for faust, though actually at #413 faust encourages Dylan to vote for EFHW, with the excuse that she was Robz's scumread. Maybe that's clever deliberate distancing, but if we have scum!faust it would at least make me think twice about a scum!EFHW idea.

Dylan is annoyingly disengaged with voting, but his willingness to leave a vote on faust is good. If faust flips scum, Didds's hesitancy to vote here might look scummy, but if he's actually town, then it looks townie for her to be pausing here.

If faust does flip scum, we know we probably don't have any other town PRs, because scum!faust probably wouldn't have been so ready to claim if he thought there was a risk of us having a fourth town PR. OTOH, if he's going down as scum anyway, then trying to get an extra PR to claim is good for them, so perhaps I shouldn't read too much into it. Like, why would the scumteam take joat unless they were also taking other stuff like recruiting and/or daychat as well?

PPE 1: well, that sorts that out then!
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #912 on: March 15, 2021, 05:43:22 pm »

THREAD LOCKED
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #913 on: March 15, 2021, 05:47:50 pm »

Vote Count 3.Final:

faust (4): Ashersky, Dylan32, SpaceAnenome, WestCoastDidds
Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
WCD (1): EFHW
Not Voting (0):


With 7 alive, it took 4 to Exile.
Night 3 starts now and ends on Wednesday, March 17th at 5:50pm Forum Time. Please submit Night Actions within 36 hours.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #914 on: March 15, 2021, 05:49:42 pm »

"They say they are the tracker!"
   "Anyone would say that to save their own skin!"
"Yeah, let's get rid of them!"


faust has been exiled. They were faust, the Town Tracker.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #915 on: March 17, 2021, 05:49:46 pm »

"Alright, alright... who isn't here today? One, two.... Six... That is weird."
   "Maybe we found them all?"
"Impossible, faust wasn't one of them and they were still here before we got rid of faust..."
   "Maybe they just decided to stop being mean?"
"Doubt it."
   "Yeah, I guess I was reaching on that one..."
"Alright, well let's get this call started then."
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #916 on: March 17, 2021, 05:49:55 pm »

Vote Count 4.0:

Not Voting (6): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 4 starts now and ends Wednesday, March 24th at 5:50pm Forum Time.

THREAD UNLOCKED!
« Last Edit: March 17, 2021, 05:52:18 pm by Swowl »
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #917 on: March 17, 2021, 08:30:06 pm »

I'm mad that I missed deadline. I would have fought against a faust exile, having just finished a reread. We need something for everyone to respond to. How about "who is the scummiest person on the faust wagon?"
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #918 on: March 17, 2021, 09:48:54 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #919 on: March 17, 2021, 09:55:00 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.

So, Joth or EFHW?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #920 on: March 17, 2021, 09:57:56 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.

So, Joth or EFHW?

"Or"..."and"...take your pick.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #921 on: March 17, 2021, 09:58:21 pm »

I'm fairly certain I will only vote for those two or myself today.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #922 on: March 17, 2021, 10:48:56 pm »

Ah, the delayed OMGUS.

And is there any actual reasoning behind this wagon analysis? After all, wagon analysis has served us so well so far this game.

I still think it’s ash. This hasn’t changed.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #923 on: March 17, 2021, 10:49:23 pm »

I'm fairly certain I will only vote for those two or myself today.

Voting for yourself would be swell.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #924 on: March 17, 2021, 11:18:24 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.
Why off wagon?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #925 on: March 17, 2021, 11:20:26 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.

This implies joth and I are partners but now you are saying it could just be one of us. So, who is the scummiest person on wagon?
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #926 on: March 17, 2021, 11:41:09 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.
Why off wagon?

That's what I would have done.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #927 on: March 17, 2021, 11:42:29 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.

This implies joth and I are partners but now you are saying it could just be one of us. So, who is the scummiest person on wagon?

On wagon?  Me, probably.  Of the remaining?  I really don't know.  It was a super towny exile so being on the thing grants bonus points as far as I'm concerned.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #928 on: March 17, 2021, 11:42:52 pm »

Also, for the record, faust's delayed claim was the absolutely mafia-ist claim of all time.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #929 on: March 17, 2021, 11:43:28 pm »

I'm fairly certain I will only vote for those two or myself today.

Voting for yourself would be swell.

If I am E-1, I will absolutely, 100%.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #930 on: March 17, 2021, 11:44:01 pm »

I feel like joth deserves a mafia win.  It's been awhile, no?  (I haven't been around, so I could be completely wrong.)
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #931 on: March 18, 2021, 07:43:57 am »

I feel like joth deserves a mafia win.  It's been awhile, no?  (I haven't been around, so I could be completely wrong.)

It has been.

But I’ll take a town win since that’s all that’s on the table for me rn.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #932 on: March 18, 2021, 07:49:33 am »

So the only explanation I can think of for no kill is that mafia recruited the traitor.

This tells us:

A) Either mafia had so far failed to identify or misidentify the traitor, which could be useful to keep in mind during a reread, or they decided to recruit on purpose, which seems unlikely at this stage of the game since they’d be in a much stronger position today had they pulled off a nightkill.

B) The mafia didn’t recruit the traitor from the get-go.

This is MiLo, so I think if we do want to win we need to really step it up today. I’m going to try to squeeze in a real re-read this week.

Also, beware that mafia, who may have daychat, can quickhammer at L-2, so votes are dangerous RN.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #933 on: March 18, 2021, 09:15:29 am »

Also, beware that mafia, who may have daychat, can quickhammer at L-2, so votes are dangerous RN.

Note where joth signals his partner about the possibility of coordinating a quickhammer.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #934 on: March 18, 2021, 09:33:04 am »

Also, beware that mafia, who may have daychat, can quickhammer at L-2, so votes are dangerous RN.

Note where joth signals his partner about the possibility of coordinating a quickhammer.

Yes, people who have daychat definitely need to coordinate these things in the public thread.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #935 on: March 18, 2021, 10:39:27 am »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

I think mafia was off-wagon.

This implies joth and I are partners but now you are saying it could just be one of us. So, who is the scummiest person on wagon?

On wagon?  Me, probably.  Of the remaining?  I really don't know.  It was a super towny exile so being on the thing grants bonus points as far as I'm concerned.

This explains our difference of opinion. This exile strikes me as quite scummy, with very little rationale behind it.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #936 on: March 18, 2021, 10:44:38 am »

Also, beware that mafia, who may have daychat, can quickhammer at L-2, so votes are dangerous RN.

Note where joth signals his partner about the possibility of coordinating a quickhammer.

Yes, people who have daychat definitely need to coordinate these things in the public thread.
These are potshots at each other, without any real content.

joth - what case can you make for ashersky based on events after your first case on him?

ash - other than OMGUS, what basis do you have for putting shade on joth?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #937 on: March 18, 2021, 10:57:47 am »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Yesterday was one of the most abysmal days of mafia I've ever seen. No one had a clue who scum was and no one was really trying to correct that except maybe Space (part of the reason they continue to be a strong townread).

Also, go re-read the end of the day. Ash was pushing the faust case. Not very hard, but he was pushing for it and he voted for him. And now he comes in and says "omg lulz he was so obviously town". Well then why did you push the wagon so hard?

For the record, he was obviously town. I saw that and what did I do? Tried to prevent his exile and chose not to vote for him. For which Ash now says I'm scummy.

I think ash is scum playing lazily because he thinks he can because, other than MiX getting a good vig shot, town has been so consistently off-base.

We keep letting him off the hook, so he keeps getting bolder. And now he's decided to kick off the last day by pushing a wagon on someone who's basically been universally town-read all game, just to flex.

By the way,

I'm fairly certain I will only vote for those two or myself today.

Voting for yourself would be swell.

If I am E-1, I will absolutely, 100%.

is quite a thing to say at MyLo.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #938 on: March 18, 2021, 11:38:29 am »

I'm the one saying faust was obv!town. ashersky said this:

Also, for the record, faust's delayed claim was the absolutely mafia-ist claim of all time.

Does that change anything?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #939 on: March 18, 2021, 11:44:22 am »

On wagon?  Me, probably.  Of the remaining?  I really don't know.  It was a super towny exile so being on the thing grants bonus points as far as I'm concerned.

I guess I misinterpreted this to mean "it was an exile obviously on town" rather than "it was an exile obviously propagated by town".

But if it's the latter, this is a circular argument: The exile was obviously done by town, therefore those who did the exile must be town. Basically tautological.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #940 on: March 18, 2021, 11:51:26 am »

So, ash did the counterclaim. That was a risk because he was obviously not the vig, especially given the casual nature of his claim, so he wasn't going to get an exile of MiX out of it. So what was scum!him after? Getting exiled as scum is much worse than getting exiled as VT. In fact, I could see him doing this as VT in order to make the game more fun for him.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #941 on: March 18, 2021, 11:56:42 am »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Is he usually a strong town player? He's disruptive, self-votes, and doesn't catch scum any better than the rest of us. He makes the game interesting, but his strong moments are when he is scum.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #942 on: March 18, 2021, 12:04:04 pm »

Counterclaim wasn't risky at all because he had a backdoor to get out of it if it wasn't going well.

"Oh I didn't actually claim vig, I just counterclaimed to annoy faust"

Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #943 on: March 18, 2021, 12:45:00 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

Yeah, it could mean scum are messing with us and doing something unexpected, which is definitely something I'd consider if I felt like I was in a good position as scum. Alternatively, it could be that the remaining scum(s) is/are so low-content they forgot to do a night action, which does happen very occasionally. If the latter is true then it's more likely that there's one than two, since I assume anyone with access to the scum QT could give night actions, so forgetting would be a thing more likely to happen if there's only one legal person.

Anyway, with all this it certainly feels more likely than previously that scum had a traitor in the mix, whereas previously I would have thought that any scumteam going for JOAT would already have thought that recruiting from the start was a good idea. If there were only two mafia to start with, targeting Robz directly on n1 in the hope of hitting mcmc's brother as a traitor seems like a decent play for the scumteam if they didn't have any other suspicions.

Other interesting realisation: scum who seriously thought mathdude was the traitor probably didn't want to vote there, because exiling him would have removed the chance to recruit him. I need to go back and check how much Didds seemed to buy into the line. And yes, before anyone else raises it, I was definitely very reluctant to exile mathdude, though I've already said plenty about how I thought that eod should have been allowed to play out and why. This would mean that either Didds is uniquely mcmc's first original partner (or I am, to her), or the original other partner was on-wagon for mathdude and confident about him not being the traitor, or on-wagon and not caring about the traitor/aiming for townpoints for helping exile an outed traitor. I feel like with those possibilities, I'm still not too sold on scum not having recruited their traitor.

To summarise, we either have a situation where:
A. Scum recruited N0, but then deliberately chose to no-kill (or forgot) last night; or
B. Scum didn't recruit N0, but did pile on the mathdude wagon, so presumably were okay exiling him in spite of all the speculation about him being traitor, and/or Didds was uniquely mcmc's partner.

Either way, something seems to have happened that I don't think of as the most likely way for things to go down, so it's worth re-examining everything.

PPE 10: Sorry, started noting things down at lunchtime and I guess the thread has moved on since!
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #944 on: March 18, 2021, 01:03:30 pm »

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #945 on: March 18, 2021, 01:41:33 pm »

Vote Count 1.7:

mathdude (7): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW, MiX, MCMC
MiX (5): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnenome, Robz888
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it took 7 to Exile.
Night 1 starts now and ends Saturday, February 27th at 3:12pm Forum Time.
Night actions are due in 36 hours.


THREAD LOCKED!

Vote Count 2.Final:

gkrieg (5): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth, EFHW, MiX
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, Ashersky, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it took 5 to Exile.
Night 2 starts now and ends in 48 hours. That is Monday, March 8th at 6:30pm Forum Time.
Please submit any Night Actions within 36 hours.

Vote Count 3.Final:

faust (4): Ashersky, Dylan32, SpaceAnenome, WestCoastDidds
Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
WCD (1): EFHW
Not Voting (0):


With 7 alive, it took 4 to Exile.
Night 3 starts now and ends on Wednesday, March 17th at 5:50pm Forum Time. Please submit Night Actions within 36 hours.

Wagon analysis time.

If, as ash suggests, EFHW and I are scum together (i.e. both scum were off-wagon D3), then it must also be the case that all three scum were on-wagon day 1, something that previously people have seemed to think is highly unlikely.

Let's go further and posit that, for all three exiles, scum split their positions. What are the viable teams?

Ash - Dylan no, together every single day
Ash - Joth no, both on-wagon with mcmc day 1
Ash - Space no, both off-wagon day 2 and on-wagon day 3
Ash - EFHW no, both on-wagon with mcmc day 1
Ash - Didds no, both on-wagon day 3
Dylan - Joth no, both on-wagon with mcmc day 1
Dylan - Space no, both off-wagon day 2 and on-wagon day 3
Dylan - EFHW no, both on-wagon with mcmc day 1
Dylan - Didds no, both on-wagon day 3
Joth - Space possible!
Joth - EFHW no, together every single day
Joth - Didds no, both on-wagon day 2
Space - EFHW possible!
Space - Didds no, both off-wagon day 1 and on-wagon day 3

Ok, I was not expecting that to only yield two possible partner pairs. So either scum behaved in an unorthodox way at some point and didn't split on- and off-wagon, OR Space is scum, with either me or EFHW as a partner. Could Space have been fooling us all along?

If anyone has ideas for something more useful to do with wagon analysis, let me know.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #946 on: March 18, 2021, 01:43:27 pm »

I will add that, while it's not super compelling to pre-suppose that scum never voted together, it's more compelling to imagine that they didn't vote together at every opportunity, which means that me and EFHW and ash and Dylan are highly unlikely pairs.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #947 on: March 18, 2021, 03:23:24 pm »

I will add that, while it's not super compelling to pre-suppose that scum never voted together, it's more compelling to imagine that they didn't vote together at every opportunity, which means that me and EFHW and ash and Dylan are highly unlikely pairs.
This is reasonable. I don't put much weight on the first analysis.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #948 on: March 18, 2021, 03:43:47 pm »

Joth, If the traitor was recruited last night, then the last baddie didn't know if they were voting with the traitor or not. The traitor might have tried to avoid voting with the baddie, but it would be unidirectional, right?


Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #949 on: March 18, 2021, 03:47:38 pm »

Joth, If the traitor was recruited last night, then the last baddie didn't know if they were voting with the traitor or not. The traitor might have tried to avoid voting with the baddie, but it would be unidirectional, right?

Well, unless scum and traitor had managed to signal each other somehow. But in that case, why would scum have recruited last night? So I think that's a fair assessment.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #950 on: March 18, 2021, 04:34:04 pm »

Vote Count 1.7:

mathdude (7): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW, MiX, MCMC
MiX (5): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnenome, Robz888
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it took 7 to Exile.
Night 1 starts now and ends Saturday, February 27th at 3:12pm Forum Time.
Night actions are due in 36 hours.


THREAD LOCKED!

Vote Count 2.Final:

gkrieg (5): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth, EFHW, MiX
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, Ashersky, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it took 5 to Exile.
Night 2 starts now and ends in 48 hours. That is Monday, March 8th at 6:30pm Forum Time.
Please submit any Night Actions within 36 hours.

Vote Count 3.Final:

faust (4): Ashersky, Dylan32, SpaceAnenome, WestCoastDidds
Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
WCD (1): EFHW
Not Voting (0):


With 7 alive, it took 4 to Exile.
Night 3 starts now and ends on Wednesday, March 17th at 5:50pm Forum Time. Please submit Night Actions within 36 hours.

Wagon analysis time.

If, as ash suggests, EFHW and I are scum together (i.e. both scum were off-wagon D3), then it must also be the case that all three scum were on-wagon day 1, something that previously people have seemed to think is highly unlikely.

-snipped-

If anyone has ideas for something more useful to do with wagon analysis, let me know.

So, one way that the traitor might try to signal the baddie is by playing follow the leader. 

EFHW follows Joths vote D1 and D2 (both off wagon D3)
Space follows WCD D1
Space follows Dylan D3
Joth follows Ash D1
Joth follows WCD D2
Dylan follows Ash D3
WCD follows Space D3

EFHW is the only person who followed someone more than once...
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #951 on: March 18, 2021, 04:34:44 pm »

Swowl, can you please prod Dylan for us?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #952 on: March 18, 2021, 08:59:57 pm »

Sorry.. was all set to come back to this game tonight but then friends appeared in other bits of the internet and stole my attention away :-P

I think the wagon-gazing is lacking something if you're only looking at who's following whom on the EoD wagons, and also not considering votes that follow our only flipped actual scum.

For instance in D1:
#40 EFHW votes Robz, following mcmc.
#129 ash votes joth, following mcmc (with faust in between).
#134 joth follows EFHW onto Ash, but only for a  few posts.
Late D1: ash, joth and efhw all follow Dylan onto the mathdude wagon, with faust in between, and with a bit of vote-wavering by both ash and EFHW in the meantime.

Possibly that type of wagon-gazing lacks something overall anyway, because nothing feels like it's likely to be a strong enough signal to scum for the remaining non-traitor to hit the traitor on what may be their very first attempt, given that they pretty much had to take out MiX on N2, and Robz makes a lot of sense as a N1 target if they hadn't already worked it out.

Anyway, I'll pull more thoughts together tomorrow if I have time!
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #953 on: March 18, 2021, 09:58:24 pm »

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.
Definitely.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #954 on: March 18, 2021, 10:06:43 pm »

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.

Posts like this make me feel like all your other posts (about me) are just bluster to rile up people against a perennially easy target for an exile.  Like, why mention any other player at this point when your other posts seem to suggest you feel most strongly that I am mafia?  You (helpfully and townfully) pointed out the importance of today's exile, so why not laser-focus on your top read?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #955 on: March 18, 2021, 10:42:21 pm »

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.

Posts like this make me feel like all your other posts (about me) are just bluster to rile up people against a perennially easy target for an exile.  Like, why mention any other player at this point when your other posts seem to suggest you feel most strongly that I am mafia?  You (helpfully and townfully) pointed out the importance of today's exile, so why not laser-focus on your top read?

Because I’m always aware of the fact that I could be wrong, and the important thing to me is finding scum, not being right. Tunneling is bad.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #956 on: March 18, 2021, 11:08:12 pm »

Vote Count 4.1:

Not Voting (6): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 4 ends Wednesday, March 24th at 5:50pm Forum Time.

*Dylan32 has been prodded.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #957 on: March 19, 2021, 07:27:00 am »

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.

Posts like this make me feel like all your other posts (about me) are just bluster to rile up people against a perennially easy target for an exile.  Like, why mention any other player at this point when your other posts seem to suggest you feel most strongly that I am mafia?  You (helpfully and townfully) pointed out the importance of today's exile, so why not laser-focus on your top read?

That sounds super-close to what I was scumreading faust for d1, though, albeit transplanted to a later point in the game. Faust was a big supporter of the Mathdude wagon, but was also fishing for support for people to vote for MiX, and apparently that came from a townie place of him wanting to get rid of Mathdude, but also wanting to see a MiX wagon.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #958 on: March 19, 2021, 12:50:36 pm »

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.

Posts like this make me feel like all your other posts (about me) are just bluster to rile up people against a perennially easy target for an exile.  Like, why mention any other player at this point when your other posts seem to suggest you feel most strongly that I am mafia?  You (helpfully and townfully) pointed out the importance of today's exile, so why not laser-focus on your top read?

That sounds super-close to what I was scumreading faust for d1, though, albeit transplanted to a later point in the game. Faust was a big supporter of the Mathdude wagon, but was also fishing for support for people to vote for MiX, and apparently that came from a townie place of him wanting to get rid of Mathdude, but also wanting to see a MiX wagon.

There are still two scum to find. I don't see the issue with joth having two exile candidates in mind.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #959 on: March 19, 2021, 12:51:19 pm »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Is he usually a strong town player? He's disruptive, self-votes, and doesn't catch scum any better than the rest of us. He makes the game interesting, but his strong moments are when he is scum.

I would like to hear joth's response to this.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #960 on: March 19, 2021, 01:06:31 pm »

Pretty sure I said I was VLA, but if I didn't, I'm still on vacation. Flight back is tomorrow morning so starting Sunday my availability should be normal. That said, I have some time to sit right now, so I'm going to start catching up right now.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #961 on: March 19, 2021, 01:07:36 pm »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Is he usually a strong town player? He's disruptive, self-votes, and doesn't catch scum any better than the rest of us. He makes the game interesting, but his strong moments are when he is scum.

I would like to hear joth's response to this.

I think of ash as a strong player. He's known for having these great plans and he knows everyone's metas. Maybe I'm wrong. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Maybe he's one of those players who is always playing to his meta-goals as well as his in-game goals, establishing a town meta that will serve him well when he flips scum or vice versa.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #962 on: March 19, 2021, 01:09:48 pm »

Ok, rather than wall post like I normally would, I'm just going to respond or add comments as I read in separate posts for ease of replying later.

I'm mad that I missed deadline. I would have fought against a faust exile, having just finished a reread. We need something for everyone to respond to. How about "who is the scummiest person on the faust wagon?"

This is a very easy thing to say with hindsight, and is a very enticing thing to say for scum who was lucky enough (or good enough) to be positioned off wagon on any misexile. Mild scum points for this first reaction.

Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #963 on: March 19, 2021, 01:18:45 pm »

So the only explanation I can think of for no kill is that mafia recruited the traitor.

This tells us:

A) Either mafia had so far failed to identify or misidentify the traitor, which could be useful to keep in mind during a reread, or they decided to recruit on purpose, which seems unlikely at this stage of the game since they’d be in a much stronger position today had they pulled off a nightkill.

B) The mafia didn’t recruit the traitor from the get-go.

This is MiLo, so I think if we do want to win we need to really step it up today. I’m going to try to squeeze in a real re-read this week.

Also, beware that mafia, who may have daychat, can quickhammer at L-2, so votes are dangerous RN.

I mean, forgetting to submit an action or no kill shenanigans are on the table, but I agree recruiting was probably the most likely cause, so we can mostly ignore those I think.

If scum did not choose daychat, a post like this would absolutely sound like coordinating with their partner, or if the traitor wasn't recruited either N0 or  then scum!joth would still need to coordinate with his partner even if daychat was chosen.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #964 on: March 19, 2021, 01:19:49 pm »

Also, beware that mafia, who may have daychat, can quickhammer at L-2, so votes are dangerous RN.

Note where joth signals his partner about the possibility of coordinating a quickhammer.

Oh, beat me to it.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #965 on: March 19, 2021, 01:28:41 pm »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Yesterday was one of the most abysmal days of mafia I've ever seen. No one had a clue who scum was and no one was really trying to correct that except maybe Space (part of the reason they continue to be a strong townread).

Also, go re-read the end of the day. Ash was pushing the faust case. Not very hard, but he was pushing for it and he voted for him. And now he comes in and says "omg lulz he was so obviously town". Well then why did you push the wagon so hard?

For the record, he was obviously town. I saw that and what did I do? Tried to prevent his exile and chose not to vote for him. For which Ash now says I'm scummy.

I think ash is scum playing lazily because he thinks he can because, other than MiX getting a good vig shot, town has been so consistently off-base.

We keep letting him off the hook, so he keeps getting bolder. And now he's decided to kick off the last day by pushing a wagon on someone who's basically been universally town-read all game, just to flex.

By the way,

I'm fairly certain I will only vote for those two or myself today.

Voting for yourself would be swell.

If I am E-1, I will absolutely, 100%.

is quite a thing to say at MyLo.

A lot of circumstantial evidence in this case, but the narrative makes sense for scum!ash.  I think I would normally not pay attention to a case like this, but joth has had better reads most of the game than I (or most of us) have had so far this game. Scum knows alignments though (sans traitor), so maybe this is scummier than towny.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #966 on: March 19, 2021, 01:38:01 pm »

No death means no kill or traitor shot, yes?

Yeah, it could mean scum are messing with us and doing something unexpected, which is definitely something I'd consider if I felt like I was in a good position as scum. Alternatively, it could be that the remaining scum(s) is/are so low-content they forgot to do a night action, which does happen very occasionally. If the latter is true then it's more likely that there's one than two, since I assume anyone with access to the scum QT could give night actions, so forgetting would be a thing more likely to happen if there's only one legal person.

Anyway, with all this it certainly feels more likely than previously that scum had a traitor in the mix, whereas previously I would have thought that any scumteam going for JOAT would already have thought that recruiting from the start was a good idea. If there were only two mafia to start with, targeting Robz directly on n1 in the hope of hitting mcmc's brother as a traitor seems like a decent play for the scumteam if they didn't have any other suspicions.

Other interesting realisation: scum who seriously thought mathdude was the traitor probably didn't want to vote there, because exiling him would have removed the chance to recruit him. I need to go back and check how much Didds seemed to buy into the line. And yes, before anyone else raises it, I was definitely very reluctant to exile mathdude, though I've already said plenty about how I thought that eod should have been allowed to play out and why. This would mean that either Didds is uniquely mcmc's first original partner (or I am, to her), or the original other partner was on-wagon for mathdude and confident about him not being the traitor, or on-wagon and not caring about the traitor/aiming for townpoints for helping exile an outed traitor. I feel like with those possibilities, I'm still not too sold on scum not having recruited their traitor.

To summarise, we either have a situation where:
A. Scum recruited N0, but then deliberately chose to no-kill (or forgot) last night; or
B. Scum didn't recruit N0, but did pile on the mathdude wagon, so presumably were okay exiling him in spite of all the speculation about him being traitor, and/or Didds was uniquely mcmc's partner.

Either way, something seems to have happened that I don't think of as the most likely way for things to go down, so it's worth re-examining everything.

PPE 10: Sorry, started noting things down at lunchtime and I guess the thread has moved on since!

This feels like town!space. Third paragraph makes an interesting point about Didds. Definitely need to reread their D1.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #967 on: March 19, 2021, 01:43:55 pm »

I will add that, while it's not super compelling to pre-suppose that scum never voted together, it's more compelling to imagine that they didn't vote together at every opportunity, which means that me and EFHW and ash and Dylan are highly unlikely pairs.

Are the unlikely pairs (joth + EFHW) and (ash and Dylan), or is it (joth + (EFHW or ash or Dylan)) or (EFHW and (joth or ash or Dylan)) or etc...?
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #968 on: March 19, 2021, 03:05:12 pm »

Going to reread Didds now.

D1:
They have exactly one post, maybe a generous two, that seems like active scum hunting. The rest are a combination of friendly fluff and I would like to hear more from (insert name here).

Votes EFHW as "RVS-lite" then votes and stays on MiX.

Didn't really take a stance on mathdude at all. Posted after MiX said intent to push him to E-1 to say that since ash was already on wagon, it wasn't as dire of a vote as normal, kind of downplaying the risk of a quickhammer.

D2:
Reiterates scumread on EFHW, votes to back it up.

Has some posts that generally seem to come from town. Seems to be making more of an effort to process the game and find scum rather than just get along and seem active.

Joins the gkrieg wagon, says Ash would be their alternative vote.

Eventually backtracks and doesn't want to switch to ash thanks to faust saying not to exile either ash or MiX because the claims.

Stays on gkrieg until EoD, doesn't have a ton of game related posts that challenge the status quo from there out.

D3:
EFHW and faust are scummy.

Votes EFHW hoping that some pressure will actually build there today unlike previous days.

Starts pushing harder towards faust than they have any other case so far.

Votes faust

Moves vote to EFHW do to a post they thought was scummy.

Waits around to see what is happening with the faust wagon, says willing to hammer.

Floats the idea briefly of no exile post faust's claim.

Hammers after Space rejoins the faust wagon. NAI hammer because if they don't it doesn't go through most likely and after being present would have looked very scummy for not hammering.

Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #969 on: March 19, 2021, 03:13:02 pm »

There's not a lot there that's like scum red flag level, but it's also not the towniest game I've ever read. Follows faust through the gkrieg exile, then promptly scumreads faust for being wrong after seeing nothing wrong with the logic the previous day. This reads somewhat opportunistic and scummy to me.  I'm not eliminating them from my exile pool right now.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #970 on: March 19, 2021, 03:35:27 pm »

Hi Dylan!

I forgot about the vaca. Sorry for prodding you.

I didn't and wouldn't have voted for mathdude on D1 because he is BRAND NEW to our forum and I am not about that kind of welcome.

I voted for gkrieg after faust encouraged me to look off wagon, and then I was mad at him for swaying me when the only scum read that I have had that I really believe in this whole freaking game is EFHW.  Because I was sore at him, I probably added more layers of truth-sensing to Space's case against him but Space has been my biggest townread this game. Joth is right...if they are scum they are fooling us all.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #971 on: March 19, 2021, 04:08:23 pm »

Hi Dylan!

I forgot about the vaca. Sorry for prodding you.

I didn't and wouldn't have voted for mathdude on D1 because he is BRAND NEW to our forum and I am not about that kind of welcome.

I voted for gkrieg after faust encouraged me to look off wagon, and then I was mad at him for swaying me when the only scum read that I have had that I really believe in this whole freaking game is EFHW.  Because I was sore at him, I probably added more layers of truth-sensing to Space's case against him but Space has been my biggest townread this game. Joth is right...if they are scum they are fooling us all.

It's all good.

So any reason you aren't voting for your single biggest scum read of the whole game if you're that confident in that read now?
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #972 on: March 19, 2021, 04:13:44 pm »

No one is voting right now. I've gotten a little gun shy of the quickhammer after some tough beats on Jimmm's site, and there was an admonition earlier from Joth (I think) not to vote yet. I especially didn't want to vote and have this thing be over and done with if I am wrong before you had even had a chance to check in.

I am also trying to be open and listen. EFHW has accused me of tunneling her, and that is entirely fair.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #973 on: March 19, 2021, 11:22:17 pm »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Is he usually a strong town player? He's disruptive, self-votes, and doesn't catch scum any better than the rest of us. He makes the game interesting, but his strong moments are when he is scum.

I would like to hear joth's response to this.

I think of ash as a strong player. He's known for having these great plans and he knows everyone's metas. Maybe I'm wrong. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Maybe he's one of those players who is always playing to his meta-goals as well as his in-game goals, establishing a town meta that will serve him well when he flips scum or vice versa.
But the basis of your case against him is that he could be playing better.  I don't see that here. Do you really think he is scum?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #974 on: March 20, 2021, 11:05:23 am »

The overarching case is that ash is usually a very strong town player. But this game he's been at best unhelpful and at worst actively harmful to town.

Is he usually a strong town player? He's disruptive, self-votes, and doesn't catch scum any better than the rest of us. He makes the game interesting, but his strong moments are when he is scum.

I would like to hear joth's response to this.

I think of ash as a strong player. He's known for having these great plans and he knows everyone's metas. Maybe I'm wrong. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Maybe he's one of those players who is always playing to his meta-goals as well as his in-game goals, establishing a town meta that will serve him well when he flips scum or vice versa.
But the basis of your case against him is that he could be playing better.  I don't see that here. Do you really think he is scum?

I really do, but also at this stage in the game I’m not ready to tunnel based on the fairly weak case I have. This is a moment to really dig in and try to find a solid case. I’m planning to embark on a reread today or tomorrow and either cement my ash case or supplant it.

With six players, each of us has a 2/5 chance of stumbling on scum by dumb luck at this point, so the question of “do you think he’s scum?” Is really just saying “are his chances of being scum better than 40%?” Or “are there three people you find townier than him?” And the answer to both those questions is yes. But I’d like to be on stronger ground than that before I drop a vote.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #975 on: March 20, 2021, 09:39:05 pm »

Ah, sorry... Today got away from me because of a lot of virtual games-based socialising before I got over to f.ds.

We have 4-ish IRL days until the next deadline, so tomorrow is my best chance at putting in some serious effort! Before last game-night, I was pretty townie on Joth because of the mcmc votes (coupled with a prior belief that scum probably would have recruited), and that Didds was pretty townie for being on the MiX wagon, especially since I was scum-reading faust in part for his insistence that there should be at least one scum on there. All that needs to be re-evaluated in the light of faust's flip and the lack of NK.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #976 on: March 20, 2021, 10:53:32 pm »

I think that, at this point in the game, basically everyone is saying adequately towny things when they post.  It's fairly easy to remain cautious and play it safe now.

As such, I think POE is the strongest tool we have left (Jorbles-style).  I think joth was making this same point.

I'm basically at joth OR EFHW, WCD OR Dylan, then Space.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #977 on: March 20, 2021, 11:04:15 pm »

Re-reading EFHW (Print Page style).

Day 1: Votes multiple players, doesn't stick to reads, calls out a few odd plays by others, no long posts at all.
Day 2: More active in the giving reads and opinions department, didn't really hone in on anyone but me and gkrieg.  More interaction with joth than I recalled. 
Day 3: Starts on Dylan.  Wishy-washy on me.  Then WCD.  Let the faust wagon go, asked for support/clarity/etc. from Space.

Day 3 was EFHW's worst, by far.  Worth a re-read if you are looking to feel worse about her alignment.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #978 on: March 21, 2021, 01:27:46 am »

I'm taking another look at Space. We've been townreading them because they were voting mcmc D1. But iirc, mcmc was never in danger. My reason for suspecting them is that I feel like they have been quite verbose but a number of times I didn't feel like they actually said much. Also POE if I continue to count ash as town. It's super late, so I'll reread Space more closely tomorrow.  Am interested to hear if anyone else shares this impression.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #979 on: March 21, 2021, 01:40:49 am »

What if scum didn't nk because they were worried about POE when another person was verified to be town? Then they could still have recruited N0. We could no-exile today for the same POE reason. 
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #980 on: March 21, 2021, 02:10:32 am »

What if scum didn't nk because they were worried about POE when another person was verified to be town? Then they could still have recruited N0. We could no-exile today for the same POE reason.

With six alive, no-exile does come into play.  I'd be okay with it, honestly.  No one is super towny, so that helps confound mafia's choices.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #981 on: March 21, 2021, 11:08:38 am »

+1 for no exile honestly.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #982 on: March 21, 2021, 12:19:32 pm »

I will vote for EFHW or for no exile, but I can't see risking the game on anyone else. :/
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #983 on: March 21, 2021, 02:20:17 pm »

I'm basically at joth OR EFHW, WCD OR Dylan, then Space.

I'm reading this as (at least?) one scum in {Joth,EFHW}, which is interesting because if we think about traitors then they're the two with possible traitor narratives I've already thought about for D1: EFHW because of her voting pattern and Joth because he was the one scum!mcmc was tunnelling. Anyway this post is a bunch of thoughts on one of those two being scum.

If EFHW is on the scum-team, the fact she voted right behind mcmc a couple of times in d1 is weird unless she's doing that to signal to the scum team as the traitor. It EFHW is the traitor, wouldn't she have signalled both of her scum buddies, and not just mcmc? If that's the case, who else was she signalling to? Her votes for d1 are:
#40: Votes Robz, right behind mcmc, and before Robz has even shown up within the game.
#122: Votes Ash, second place on the wagon right after town!gkrieg.
#157: Starts a wagon on me.
#188: Votes Mathdude, where Dylan, town!faust and Ash are already on the wagon.
#237: Votes Joth, where mcmc is first on the wagon.
#317: Moves back to Mathdude, where Dylan, town!faust, Ash and Joth are on-wagon now.

I think if EFHW is a traitor and she's signalling to the mafia using votes, then the original pair is most likely to be mcmc-Dylan, because EFHW could have joined Ash on the gkrieg wagon at #122 instead of voting for Ash, if she'd really been signalling to the mafia by following them. However, Dylan voted Mathdude at #23 and just never moved for the whole of D1, leaving any traitor who wanted to follow his votes with exceedingly few options.

I also don't think Joth is a likely partner for EFHW, because either mcmc was bussing Joth hard even though mcmc doesn't appear to like bussing at all, or Joth was the traitor, mcmc was unlucky about who he chose to tunnel, and EFHW was weirdly just sheeping her full-mafia buddy some of the time. While some of those scenarios could happen at a pinch, there are probably more likely explanations if we look outside this trio.

Joth is an unlikely original scum with mcmc because of the mcmc bussing, so let's explore how his voting looks if he's a traitor. He votes Didds, Dylan, gkrieg, MiX, Ash, (unvotes), and Mathdude in D1, which is a wide pool. The people he didn't vote for are EFHW, faust, Robz, me and mcmc. Since I don't think he and EFHW are partners, and everyone else other than me has already flipped, then this seems unlikely as a method of signalling that he knows who scum are, because he'd have had to be inconsistent about it and voted for at least one of them, which is bad for signalling. It just doesn't seem like the voting pattern of someone who knows what's going on. In D2 he goes for Ash and then gkrieg, then in D3 only Ash. Plus, his outrage at Ash's counterclaim feels pretty close to my outrage at MiX's D1 play, so I read that as coming from a townie place.

So if there has to be one scum in Joth or EFHW then traitor!EFHW with scum!Dylan seems the most likely. I would have to re-read their actual interactions, though I do recall scum-reading Dylan for some pro-Mathdude-exile posting, just not quite as much as I scumread faust for the same thing.

Also, it's also perfectly possible that the scums are two out of {Ash, Didds, Dylan} instead, but that needs to be a different set of thinking in a different post.

Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #984 on: March 21, 2021, 09:28:24 pm »

Vote Count 4.2:

Not Voting (6): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky, Dylan32


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 4 ends Wednesday, March 24th at 5:50pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #985 on: March 22, 2021, 12:27:04 am »

Vote: No exile

So I was thinking I had a pretty good idea who was scum based mostly on having decently strong townreads on a few people, but then I remembered that the traitor wasn't recruited N0 confounds some of my reasoning since partner interactions wouldn't be the same there. So I definitely think no exile is the right move here.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #986 on: March 22, 2021, 12:29:22 am »

Vote: No exile

So I was thinking I had a pretty good idea who was scum based mostly on having decently strong townreads on a few people, but then I remembered that the traitor wasn't recruited N0 confounds some of my reasoning since partner interactions wouldn't be the same there. So I definitely think no exile is the right move here.

EBWOP "that the possibility the traitor wasn't recruited"

I started typing that sentence in a slightly different way, edited for clarity and accidentally left out the obvious conditional on that.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #987 on: March 22, 2021, 08:00:43 am »

Vote: No exile
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #988 on: March 22, 2021, 08:41:40 am »

then I remembered that the traitor wasn't recruited N0

Possible scum-slip here, though it's only particularly damning in the context of the two other part-written posts I have. Please can I have time to post these before anyone else no-exiles?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #989 on: March 22, 2021, 08:43:06 am »

Yes, of course

Unvote
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #990 on: March 22, 2021, 08:54:01 am »

Actually, why don't I just post one of these part-written posts now, with the following caveat: I've split my reasoning into "what if at least one of EFHW and Joth is scum?" (the thing I posted already) and "what if neither of them is?", which covers the whole space of probabilities between them, but is not good for focusing on how unlikely some things in one scenario are compared to some things in the other.

Given the possibility of a Dylan scumslip about scum not having recruited N0, I'm leaning towards a Dylan-EFHW hypothesis, though it's also worrying me a bit how easily Didds is just following along with opinions here. She did that with the "Nothing for me to do, yeah?" and then active-but-passive posts during faust's exile, too, so it's still ringing scumbells. The obvious common denominator would be scum!Dylan, so my feeling now is I'd vote there above anywhere else. In an ideal world, I'd have time to attempt to work out how unlikely each of the possible 20 scum-pairings is. Let's see how I go. I also have a mostly-completed Dylan re-read, for obvious reasons. (At least hopefully obvious following me hitting "post" on my other tab!).
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #991 on: March 22, 2021, 08:56:15 am »

[This was all written at least 12 hours ago, but has been sitting unposted because I'm wary of the unknowns I mentioned in my previous post]

I've already looked at the "at least one scum in {Joth,EFHW}" hypothesis, but there's also the "no scum in {EFHW,Joth}" thing to consider.

Looking at D1 wagons, it's hard to see anything that would tie any two out of {Didds,Dylan,Ash} together as looking like they're working with mcmc and against town. Dylan is on Mathdude all day, Didds is on EFHW for most of the day before moving to Mix, and Ash meanders around, voting Didds, gkrieg and joth before ending up on Mathdude, with a very short interlude on Robz. He's on the Joth wagon at the same time as mcmc (and town!faust), but none of the rest of his behaviour seems to coordinate.

The D2 wagons also look quite uncoordinated. Dylan joins my MiX vote early on, and is the only non-green (to me) person in a three-person wagon. Didds goes straight for EFHW, but eventually moves to follow faust's gkrieg push. The others on that wagon are either flipped green (faust and MiX), or assumed green for this hypothetical non-scum-EFHW-and-Joth situation. Neither of the other two (Dylan and Ash) was even voting at the end of the day.

I just don't see much cooperation between any pairs here with D2 behaviour. Ash could have lent support to the EFHW or MiX wagons, but instead supported my wagon on faust before unvoting towards the end, so I guess if we have to propose any pairs out of this, then it would be Dylan-Didds.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #992 on: March 22, 2021, 09:05:41 am »

Space -- this is all useful information.  I wonder if you can get it all put into the thread, and then we let the day end without an exile.

If mafia take out another towny, you (or we, if you aren't around anymore) can add that data point to your info.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #993 on: March 22, 2021, 09:39:07 am »

Actually, why don't I just post one of these part-written posts now, with the following caveat: I've split my reasoning into "what if at least one of EFHW and Joth is scum?" (the thing I posted already) and "what if neither of them is?", which covers the whole space of probabilities between them, but is not good for focusing on how unlikely some things in one scenario are compared to some things in the other.

Given the possibility of a Dylan scumslip about scum not having recruited N0, I'm leaning towards a Dylan-EFHW hypothesis, though it's also worrying me a bit how easily Didds is just following along with opinions here. She did that with the "Nothing for me to do, yeah?" and then active-but-passive posts during faust's exile, too, so it's still ringing scumbells. The obvious common denominator would be scum!Dylan, so my feeling now is I'd vote there above anywhere else. In an ideal world, I'd have time to attempt to work out how unlikely each of the possible 20 scum-pairings is. Let's see how I go. I also have a mostly-completed Dylan re-read, for obvious reasons. (At least hopefully obvious following me hitting "post" on my other tab!).

Regarding active but passive posts... I set an alarm to check in so literally, I look and see that I am on the faust wagon so there is no need to move my vote in order to ensure that we exile.  However, I did stay around and engage with those who were present including unvoting so you had some time.  It hasn't been passive so much as accomodating who have a better read than I do.

In is inaccurate to suggest, however, that my votes have been just following along. I have consistently voting for EFHW, only moving once it becomes clear that being stubborn about that vote isn't good for town.  I was never going to vote for mathdude because it was his first game, so consolidated my vote on the other wagon D1. I started D2 voting for EFHW, and only moved to gkrieg once faust made a good argument AND it once again became clear that no one else found anything scummy about EFHW. D3 (as I said before) I was still sore about the gkrieg mis-exile. Today I have been clear about my EFHW intentions.  I, however, am also not so cocksure that I am willing to risk the game on my read, though, so no-exile is a possibility, too.  There is no other vote that I can see myself making. I have not been voting around or flitting from person to person in terms of suspicion.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #994 on: March 22, 2021, 05:56:14 pm »

Space -- this is all useful information.  I wonder if you can get it all put into the thread, and then we let the day end without an exile.

If mafia take out another towny, you (or we, if you aren't around anymore) can add that data point to your info.

I'm trying to get my thoughts down, but they don't all exist yet.. I'm re-reading the same info everyone else is, in light of faust's flip and the unexpected no-kill result. I have a part-done Dylan re-read, and since I realised there are only 10 possible scum-pairs and not 20, I started more of a complete survey of the possibilities.

I feel like if I'm the only one driving content, then I'm a bit of an obvious nk target, unless I'm completely wrong, in which case perhaps they'll have more incentive to leave me alive. Hopefully by stating that, I'll at least have added some extra wifom around everything. Even better might be if the rest of town had something to contribute to a discussion...
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #995 on: March 22, 2021, 11:02:39 pm »

I'm around, in favor of no exile.  Saving my thoughts for tomorrow.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #996 on: March 23, 2021, 01:29:29 am »

Vote Count 4.3:

No Exile (1): Dylan32
Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky


With 6 alive, it takes 4 to Exile.
Day 4 ends Wednesday, March 24th at 5:50pm Forum Time. That is under 2 days from now!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #997 on: March 23, 2021, 08:48:09 am »

Space is reasonably sure they’ll get whacked in the night, so she wants to talk it out now.

EFHW is apparently certain that she will be alive tomorrow so has no need to share her thoughts.

The former is super town, the latter is super scummy.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #998 on: March 23, 2021, 08:56:59 am »

I think WCD's point on EFHW is valid.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #999 on: March 23, 2021, 12:05:14 pm »

I think WCD's point on EFHW is valid.

I am pretty certain. Would you pick me to nk? I actually think scum doesn't have any good choices for the nk -- Space is the most likely -- but they would almost certainly see me as a possible mis-exile. Also, the thoughts I considered posting all seemed like they would help scum and not town.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1000 on: March 24, 2021, 05:27:51 pm »

Wow, we're pretty much all prodable now. I know people are waiting around for me to post, but it's been a busy couple of days, and my attention is split.

I'm a bit surprised that nobody else is saying anything at all. Surely not everyone else feels like they're safe from the NK? Anyway, I have from now till deadline free at least. Though I've only just remembered I'm still only 4 hours ahead and not 5, so it's actually quite close.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1001 on: March 24, 2021, 05:47:17 pm »

Dylan re-read, with a strong "what if he's scum" sort of bias:

Early game vote on Mathdude, and a bunch of engagement with the concept of RVS.
Then goes on the post a bunch about stuff like the Space Gambit. It isn't too relevant to the game at that point, and isn't going to help with alignment, but on the flipside, it's getting conversation moving early on, so only really a source of scumpoints in a retrospective re-read where I'm looking for reasons Dylan might not be townie.
Ash made a post at #129 townreading MiX, Mathdude and gkrieg (and voting Joth). Dylan picked up on that in the very next post because gkrieg hadn't really said anything to warrant a change in opinion on his alignment. That's kind of a scum-hunting post, but also we now know that Ash's townreads were all good, so it's something scum would worry about. He did kind of back down at #145, after Ash gave a good response.
#146 now seems to be expressing suspicion on Joth. So now Dylan pivots from questioning Ash to joining him on putting pressure on Joth.
#152 Specific comments inviting MiX to put an EFHW case forward, which is interesting. I'm not sure whether to take it as a townie admission of lack of info, or a scummy "there's no case on EFHW" defensive case, or an alternatively-scummy challenge to MiX to build an EFHW case that scum can then utilise.
#178 Re-votes Mathdude, this time making it clear it's for a scumread rather than RVS. Though for vote count purposes, Dylan still remains the instigator of the wagon, since this was just a re-vote. However, it serves to get the thread talking about mathdude being scummy, especially because it looked like the third such vote in four posts. (For context, Mathdude had dropped a protest vote on me for low activity).
#196 Quite a long post engaging with MiX basically about why Mathdude is scummy, and it's scummy for MiX to suggest that voting there is scummy.
#219 Responding to my post at #218, which was trying to be a gentle reminder that being a newbie here is tough because there's a big learning curve around what the community sees as scummy vs what actually necessarily comes from a scum mindset. Dylan's response was basically that too many people are willing to defend Mathdude. This could just be a totally misguided town tunnel on a newbie, but if so, Dylan's being really blinkered by not even trying to absorb the defenses he's complaining that other people are putting forward.
#287 Keen to squash a possible Robz town-slip.
#289-#290 Lots of reasoning about Robz, with an undertone of worrying about what powers scum will have picked. It's too early for town to be really worrying about what's out there, but hard to say now whether his interest in scum powers is just idle curiosity or if it's because he's on the scummy side.
#365 Like MiX, Dylan claims to have jumped to a conclusion about how Mathdude must be fakeclaiming. We know MiX's was a lie, and that he didn't really think Mathdude was scum fake-claiming, but does Dylan actually believe it, or is he also lying to town in order to lock in the mixile?
#371 Hedgey defence of MiX, in encouragement of the Mathdude exile. No townpoints from me there.
#373 I'm very much not a fan of a post that starts "Wait a second" and then just piles more on the wagon instead of waiting even a fraction of a second...
#386 Weird post-hammer words to Mathdude about why he can't point to anything he did wrong, whereas before, Dylan was really pushing the "bad claim" line.

Day 2
#401: Happily jumps on the MiX wagon with me. I kind of give that townpoints, but not many.
#406: Says he originally thought Mathdude was claiming Vig, before following MiX's lead and reading traitor. We now know that MiX also read Vig initially, but deliberately didn't say so in-thread.
Quite a long absence, then a catch-up post at #555, which sounds really quite reasonable and non-scummy. After-note: I may have been buttered up by his accurate explanation to MiX of why he was just so un-followable this game.
Another long absence, then a small note to the thread at #702 saying he's busy. I can definitely sympathise.
#712 Unvotes MiX, and stays not voting until EoD2, which is disappointingly non-committal, but also probably better than a bad vote if he really didn't have the capacity to engage. Slight scumbells, especially since he was watching and commenting at #743 and #760, saying he was going off a gkrieg exile, but not making any move to offer an alternative by voting anywhere else. The hammer was at #768.

Day 3
#808 Biggish defense of why he stated D1 that he wanted to wait for what Mathdude said, but didn't unvote so that Mathdude wasn't poised at E-1. I think faust had a decent point.
Note: If EFHW's scum then #806 was a bus putting Dylan up to be the leading early-D3 wagon. However, EFHW then uses Dylan's post to say she's now townreading Dylan and scumreading faust. If they're a scum pairing then it's quite nice playing on EFHW's part because she's actively responding to content posted by faust in D3, quite possibly with no cooperation from Dylan if she was indeed the traitor.
#813 Says the risk of quickhammers seemed low in general, which implies that he actually considered it at the time, which just feels like a bit too much detail to give retrospectively.
#814: "I was thinking EFHW might be scum, but I'm not sure if scum!EFHW would have unvoted me right there like that." -- honestly with a decent scum-suspicion on the Dylan-EFHW pairing, this sounds like well-placed distancing, since of course scum!EFHW would want to make exactly the performance she made of unvoting Dylan for townreading him.
#848 another catching-up post. Oddly many mentions of EFHW, who at this point may still be an unrecruited traitor. Even if my traitor theory is off the mark, they could still both have been scum from the start, just with EFHW putting down particular weird votes with respect to mcmc.
#889 puts faust to E-1, which is something scum would want to do on a wagon that is being run up by town.

Day 4
#960 Comes back briefly about having been on vacation. It's true he said in-thread that he was making travel plans, but also I think it was quite easy to miss.
#961-#969 stream of catching-up posts. Picks up on my note about Didds being the only other off-Mathdude person left, with relation to whether scum really thought Mathdude was the traitor. Does a Didds re-read. I'll leave D6's alive townies to think through the wifom implications of that, given that I think I support Dylan as the D5 exile.
#985 Jumps onto the no-Exile wagon, which I think is clearly a bonus for scum.
Also #985, makes a possible scumslip in "but then I remembered that the traitor wasn't recruited N0".
#986 Immediately corrects the possible scumslip, with a plausible-sounding cover story, but it's still out there, and I think we really should consider that Dylan-EFHW is a decent possibility.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1002 on: March 24, 2021, 05:50:59 pm »

Vote Count 4.Final:

No Exile (1): Dylan32
Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Ashersky


With 6 alive it would of taken 4 to Exile.
Night 4 starts now and ends Friday, March 26th at 5:50pm.
Please submit Night Actions within 36 hours.

** You may post for an early night phase in your QT. If 100% of players does this, Night will end on March 25th at 5:50pm.

THREAD LOCKED!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1003 on: March 26, 2021, 05:53:25 pm »

Another day dawns on this conference call that seems to just keep on going. The town's attempt to stop the violence only lasted until the night. As the remaning members log onto their usual call, they notice that there is one person missing...

Ashersky has been killed! They were Ashersky, the Vanilla Townie.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1004 on: March 26, 2021, 05:53:48 pm »

Vote Count 5.0:

Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Dylan32


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.
Day 5 starts now and ends Friday, April 2nd at 5:53pm Forum Time.


THREAD UNLOCKED!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1005 on: March 26, 2021, 08:18:53 pm »

Huh...that was unexpected.

Okay, Space....I am ride or die with you.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1006 on: March 26, 2021, 09:27:03 pm »

Huh...that was unexpected.

Okay, Space....I am ride or die with you.

Ok, this feels scummy. Like Space was about the only person that was universally townread to my memory, to the point that it's a bit suspicious that they weren't killed, especially if there was nothing we could do to interfere with the kill. I don't think that's strong enough evidence to completely cancel out my townread on Space, but my first instinct seeing ash instead of Space was "hold up, am I missing something." WCD's first reaction is "I'll follow along with whatever Space says."  In (what's the new replacement for LYLO?), this confidence sheeping someone definitely feels more like scum buddying someone that they know has bad reads that they can follow to an easy win.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1007 on: March 26, 2021, 09:52:26 pm »

Nah... I just made a list of who I thought I could trust and Space is at the top.

I figure scum knows that Space is being universally town read, and they either kill them or leave them alive in order to generate suspicion. Me saying I am ride or die with them is saying that didn’t work....I am not suspicious.

At this point, scum is all about raising new suspicions and casting doubt. So, you trying to throw  shade on me is exactly what I expected to see. Your buddy will likely back you up before too long. You only have to get one misexile off to win.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1008 on: March 26, 2021, 09:59:08 pm »

Nah... I just made a list of who I thought I could trust and Space is at the top.

I figure scum knows that Space is being universally town read, and they either kill them or leave them alive in order to generate suspicion. Me saying I am ride or die with them is saying that didn’t work....I am not suspicious.

At this point, scum is all about raising new suspicions and casting doubt. So, you trying to throw  shade on me is exactly what I expected to see. Your buddy will likely back you up before too long. You only have to get one misexile off to win.

You will note that I'm not, nor did I say Space was scummy. I said my gut reaction was of doubt, but that I don't think that was enough to overcome the strong townread I had, for exactly the WIFOM reason you just said. I think you are scum, which honestly is consistent with what I was thinking before because of PoE. joth is towny (or at the very least not mcmc's partner), and Space was towny. I'm town, so to me that leaves you and EFHW.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1009 on: March 26, 2021, 10:01:39 pm »

If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1010 on: March 27, 2021, 12:31:33 am »

Huh. Well ash being town blows all my reads of the game out of the water. I feel very much at square one. I think I need to do some re-reads and wagon analysis tomorrow (technically today).
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1011 on: March 27, 2021, 08:36:07 am »

If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.

I think I disagree. I think is in our collective best interest to towncore, so figuring out who is town is better for us than trying to figure out who is scum. So, I’m thinking everyone should layout why they are town and how their actions and votes have been town, might be more valuable than trying to find scum because thus far we have been ridiculously terrible at finding scum.

I’ve just started thinking about it last night, so maybe there are reasons this is not a good idea, but right now I kind of like it.

What do y’all think?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1012 on: March 27, 2021, 08:50:14 am »

So, here is my list of friend to foe

WCD
Space
Dylan—Joth
EFHW

I’ll work on a post later about my game and votes this far and why they are evidence of my towniness. I think everyone else should do the same.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1013 on: March 27, 2021, 09:15:36 am »

[qu ;Dote author=WestCoastDidds link=topic=20694.msg865311#msg865311 date=1616809946]
Nah... I just made a list of who I thought I could trust and Space is at the top.

I figure scum knows that Space is being universally town read, and they either kill them or leave them alive in order to generate suspicion. Me saying I am ride or die with them is saying that didn’t work....I am not suspicious.

At this point, scum is all about raising new suspicions and casting doubt. So, you trying to throw  shade on me is exactly what I expected to see. Your buddy will likely back you up before too long. You only have to get one misexile off to win.
[/quote]
That last paragraph is pretty good scum play if Didds is scum. One thing though. She says "expected." She has thought this through in detail. Not her usual approach. 

I do like the towncore idea, though. Will work on mine.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1014 on: March 27, 2021, 09:18:26 am »

It would be hilarious if Didds and Dylan were scum partners having this conversation.  But I think the scumteam is her and joth.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1015 on: March 27, 2021, 09:20:09 am »

If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.
Why can't it be both of them? This comment is confusing.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1016 on: March 27, 2021, 09:24:54 am »

If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.
Why can't it be both of them? This comment is confusing.
Ok, it makes more sense in conjunction with the previous post. It seemed odd that he was apparently considering me obv!scum without having mentioned it.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1017 on: March 27, 2021, 10:38:59 am »



Nah... I just made a list of who I thought I could trust and Space is at the top.

I figure scum knows that Space is being universally town read, and they either kill them or leave them alive in order to generate suspicion. Me saying I am ride or die with them is saying that didn’t work....I am not suspicious.

At this point, scum is all about raising new suspicions and casting doubt. So, you trying to throw  shade on me is exactly what I expected to see. Your buddy will likely back you up before too long. You only have to get one misexile off to win.

That last paragraph is pretty good scum play if Didds is scum. One thing though. She says "expected." She has thought this through in detail. Not her usual approach. 

I do like the towncore idea, though. Will work on mine.

I’m not sure that anticipating that scum would come out of the gate trying to frame me is scummy. Space has so much goodwill that it would be way harder case. I know that I’m town, so I expect to have to defend that because scum will have decided their person they are gunning for in terms of misexile, and I think I’m probably a pretty good target.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1018 on: March 27, 2021, 11:43:45 am »

If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.
Why can't it be both of them? This comment is confusing.
Ok, it makes more sense in conjunction with the previous post. It seemed odd that he was apparently considering me obv!scum without having mentioned it.

So I don't necessarily have a strong case for obv!scum you, but off of PoE, for me with the assumption Space is town, it's 2 of {EFHW, Didds, Joth}. I think joth is less likely than either of you but not impossible. So if Didds and I are actually both town, that would mean EFHW+joth. The same comment could be directed to you EFHW about why is it joth instead of you.

If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.

I think I disagree. I think is in our collective best interest to towncore, so figuring out who is town is better for us than trying to figure out who is scum. So, I’m thinking everyone should layout why they are town and how their actions and votes have been town, might be more valuable than trying to find scum because thus far we have been ridiculously terrible at finding scum.

I’ve just started thinking about it last night, so maybe there are reasons this is not a good idea, but right now I kind of like it.

What do y’all think?

There's so few people left, scum hunting and towncoring are kind of the same thing. Like I said, I don't have a big overarching case (yet) for why you and EFHW are scum, but my townreads are stronger on Space and joth, which by PoE leaves you and EFHW, which is essentially towncoring. Of course, I haven't made a case for those reads yet, so I guess I do need to write that up later. It's worth noting you did just try to shift the convo away from scumhunting as you get accused of saying something scummy.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1019 on: March 27, 2021, 03:27:03 pm »


If it's not actually you Didds, then you need to convince me why it's Joth instead of you if we agree Space is town.

I think I disagree. I think is in our collective best interest to towncore, so figuring out who is town is better for us than trying to figure out who is scum. So, I’m thinking everyone should layout why they are town and how their actions and votes have been town, might be more valuable than trying to find scum because thus far we have been ridiculously terrible at finding scum.

I’ve just started thinking about it last night, so maybe there are reasons this is not a good idea, but right now I kind of like it.

What do y’all think?

There's so few people left, scum hunting and towncoring are kind of the same thing. Like I said, I don't have a big overarching case (yet) for why you and EFHW are scum, but my townreads are stronger on Space and joth, which by PoE leaves you and EFHW, which is essentially towncoring. Of course, I haven't made a case for those reads yet, so I guess I do need to write that up later. It's worth noting you did just try to shift the convo away from scumhunting as you get accused of saying something scummy.

I am only trying to shift the conversation away from scumhunting because I think we suck at it? I am saying that I think it is more important for me to demonstrate the ways that I am town (and I want everyone else to do it too) instead of trying to prove why Joth is scum instead of me.  I think we have, as the town group, been spectacularly bad at finding scum. So lets try to find town. That isn't meant to dissuade anyone else from doing whatever they want to do, but asking me to make a case for why Joth is scum is rough.  I find both him and you super ambiguous.

So, why are you town Dylan? How are you more town than Joth? Space has suggested that you and EHFW are the most likely scum pair.  What causes you to disagree with that?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1020 on: March 27, 2021, 03:39:39 pm »

There's some low hanging fruit we haven't picked yet. For instance, who was ash most suspecting? Obvious as it is, that's very much something scum is considering with a kill this late in the game. My memory is that he was somewhat focused on EFHW, though I don't think he was the biggest fan of me either.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1021 on: March 27, 2021, 07:13:45 pm »

Just checking in! I like that suddenly everybody else is saying things, after how dead it was at the end of the game day. I support Didds's suggestion of everyone giving a town-case on themselves. However, I also think that with so few players left, it's worth each person thinking through all the likely scum pairings and seeing what does and doesn't seem to fit everyone's play as they've observed it.

For example, I think Joth-EFHW is still a really unlikely pairing, because either full-scum!mcmc decided to vote full-scum!Joth for most of D1 in spite of the fact he doesn't seem to bus at all in the most recent scum games of his that I could find, or it means that somehow full-scum!mcmc and full-scum!EFHW decided to be the only two people pushing a wagon on scum!Joth (either full-scum or traitor) for 80 votes, before EFHW moved back to the Mathdude wagon. A possible narrative for that could almost b that they wanted to build an alternative wagon that wasn't EFHW, since she was also at 2 votes at that point, and maybe they'd rather have a non-scum be the main alternative to the newbie. But if that's the case, then why not both just pick one of the wagons that already had a townie on it to support instead?

Anyway, my paragraph above doesn't make Joth-EFHW a total impossibility, but it's a weird thing that would need to be explained by anyone trying to say that Joth-EFHW is their top pick for scums. I'd quite like to tabulate the "weird things" for each possible pairing, rather than just considering individual players now, because even if we can only exile people one at a time, the actual reality is that there is a particular set of two who're working together, and at least one of those two was aware of scum!mcmc from the start.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1022 on: March 28, 2021, 02:27:46 pm »

Vote Count 5.1:

Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Dylan32


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.
Day 5 starts now and ends Friday, April 2nd at 5:53pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1023 on: March 28, 2021, 03:03:51 pm »

I just reread the entire thread. I've decided I don't want to exile joth, but Didds is the only one I actually see as scummy. But I have to pick 2 somehow. I hesitate to give Space town status because of their driving the faust exile. Certainly they have put in considerable effort and made good points along the way. Dylan is mostly quite towny, but he also voted faust, without a reason, maybe had a scumslip. A bunch of little things that could go either way, depending on how biased one feels when reading, like the unnecessary no exile vote.

Scum to chum: Didds, Dylan, Space, joth
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1024 on: March 28, 2021, 03:12:09 pm »

I was going to do a town case on myself, but I'm so clearly biased. Anyone could take the opposite viewpoints of anything I might point out. I don't have evidence, like a result or hammering scum. So I did the reread instead, which took several hours.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1025 on: March 28, 2021, 03:44:01 pm »

I've been thinking about it and "everyone do a case on why they're town seems like something that comes from scum.

I mean, scum has spent the whole game intentionally thinking about how to make themselves look towny. Being asked to show their work is kind of a dream come true for them. Whereas town is likely to have a reaction more like the one EFHW just espoused. "Because... I am"
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1026 on: March 28, 2021, 06:33:38 pm »

I've been thinking about it and "everyone do a case on why they're town seems like something that comes from scum.

I mean, scum has spent the whole game intentionally thinking about how to make themselves look towny. Being asked to show their work is kind of a dream come true for them. Whereas town is likely to have a reaction more like the one EFHW just espoused. "Because... I am"

You seem to be ignoring the whole "we have completely sucked at scum hunting" context of my idea.  So far, every one of us has been spectacularly wrong about who scum are.  But you are correct, there could be a distinct lack of effort that renders the idea hollow as an avenue to towncore. So, do you have better ideas for turning over a new leaf? Some way we don't screw up again and just lose this month of our lives? I am seriously all ears.

I am sitting to read for an hour or so now (J is watching a soccer game...) and I am going to try to focus on pairs, but am open to whatever other ideas there are.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1027 on: March 28, 2021, 08:11:19 pm »

Alright! I reread the game, although I often skimmed Mix's monster posts. Color coding helps me...

Vote Count 1.Final:

mathdude (7): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW, MiX, MCMC
MiX (5): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnenome, Robz888
Not Voting (0):

Vote Count 2.Final:

gkrieg (5): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth, EFHW, MiX
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, Ashersky, gkrieg

Vote Count 3.Final:

faust (4): Ashersky, Dylan32, SpaceAnenome, WestCoastDidds
Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
WCD (1): EFHW
Not Voting (0):


Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1028 on: March 28, 2021, 08:32:45 pm »

I know that I am green, so I am leaving myself out of my evaluation.

Day one... since both of the wagons were town, I don't think scum cares where they were.  Joth, dylan, and EFHW are all on math. Space and I are on Mix.

Day two... Joth and EFHW are both on gkrieg. If Joth is scum, is it likely that traitorEFHW risks following him that closely? Probably not.

Day three... Dylan is early on faust, along with space and me. Joth is on Ash, EFHW is on me.  If either Joth or EFHW is scum with Dylan, there was no reason to join the faust wagon since the exile was going through regardless.

On my reread, I tried not to tunnel EFHW. The VCA supports Dylan/EFHW as much as Dylan/Joth. EFHW/Joth is not as likley, to me, because they are both on gkrieg and there wouldn't have been any reason to do that.

So, right now Dylan is my common denominator.

And then I tried to think about the Ash kill.  Joth has been fixated on Ash D3 and D4. Having Ash as the NK took all of the wind out of his sails. I don't think scum Joth gets quite so fixated, and if he does, he doesn't nightkill him knowing he can be keep flying that flag without looking scummy. EFHW is one of the most savvy players out there. She definitely has the ability to suggest or go along with leaving Space alive to create some doubt in everyone's most towny read. Further, in addition to me, she has collected votes from MiX, Robz (D1), gkreig (D2), and was on Asher's short list on D4 (we no exiled). So, town has found her vote-worthy. That neither Dylan nor Joth vote for her suggests to me that she is likely the traitor.

So, I have landed at most likely pair:
Dylan/EFHW

Second most likely:
Dylan/Joth

Dylan's posts are super towny, but his votes are not. Further, he posts are long and have lots going on but don't actually end up exerting any influence.
 
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1029 on: March 28, 2021, 11:30:55 pm »

How do you conclude that I'm the traitor based on joth and Dylan not voting for me? Wouldn't it be more likely that one of them was the traitor?

Your thoughts on the ashersky nk are interesting, though there is WIFOM, of course.

Town!joth and I didn't/wouldn't have voted faust because we both saw him as obv!town. The other three of you are all that wagon, and I believe two of you are scum.

Your observation on Dylan's votes is a stronger version of something I was also thinking.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1030 on: March 28, 2021, 11:32:56 pm »

So what game plan for scum today? Bus while looking out for quickhammer chances?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1031 on: March 28, 2021, 11:34:32 pm »

Didds, where is your case that you are town?
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1032 on: March 29, 2021, 01:48:11 am »

I know that I am green, so I am leaving myself out of my evaluation.

Day one... since both of the wagons were town, I don't think scum cares where they were.  Joth, dylan, and EFHW are all on math. Space and I are on Mix.

Day two... Joth and EFHW are both on gkrieg. If Joth is scum, is it likely that traitorEFHW risks following him that closely? Probably not.

Day three... Dylan is early on faust, along with space and me. Joth is on Ash, EFHW is on me.  If either Joth or EFHW is scum with Dylan, there was no reason to join the faust wagon since the exile was going through regardless.

On my reread, I tried not to tunnel EFHW. The VCA supports Dylan/EFHW as much as Dylan/Joth. EFHW/Joth is not as likley, to me, because they are both on gkrieg and there wouldn't have been any reason to do that.

So, right now Dylan is my common denominator.

And then I tried to think about the Ash kill.  Joth has been fixated on Ash D3 and D4. Having Ash as the NK took all of the wind out of his sails. I don't think scum Joth gets quite so fixated, and if he does, he doesn't nightkill him knowing he can be keep flying that flag without looking scummy. EFHW is one of the most savvy players out there. She definitely has the ability to suggest or go along with leaving Space alive to create some doubt in everyone's most towny read. Further, in addition to me, she has collected votes from MiX, Robz (D1), gkreig (D2), and was on Asher's short list on D4 (we no exiled). So, town has found her vote-worthy. That neither Dylan nor Joth vote for her suggests to me that she is likely the traitor.

So, I have landed at most likely pair:
Dylan/EFHW

Second most likely:
Dylan/Joth

Dylan's posts are super towny, but his votes are not. Further, he posts are long and have lots going on but don't actually end up exerting any influence.

Yeah, there are a lot of holes in this.

Day 1... I just don't think this is exactly true. Sure scum might not care which wagon ultimately goes through, but scum should always care about where they are. I mean look at how the next couple days went: we spent a pretty big amount of time fighting arguments about scum being off the wagon D1. D1 scum wouldn't have known that MiX was what he was and that he would essentially IC himself, so I could imagine a case for thinking being on his wagon as opposed to mathdude's would have been a way better position down the road.

Day 2... The assumption that the traitor was trying to follow or signal to their partner seems dubious. To me, a big part of why I don't think joth is scum was because I don't think mcmc buses like that D1. The thing I realized earlier today where I said I needed to rethink things is that this logic holds for scum!mcmc and known partner!joth, but it wouldn't hold at all if joth was actually an unrecruited traitor. Mcmc wouldn't have known that was a bus. So scum!EFHW and traitor!joth is still on the table.

Day 3... This logic here is maybe fine, except you can just as easily swap you and I in this argument from everyone else's perspective. The interesting thing is that if you are actually town, joth and EFHW had to be thrilled to not be on that wagon, especially with the air of inevitability that seemed to surround it that day.

I don't know how you are drawing conclusions on VCA when this is the breakdown of the exile wagons--
EFHW: on math and gkrieg, off faust. (2 on 1 off)
joth: on mathdude and gkrieg, off faust. (2 on 1 off)
me: on math and faust, off gkrieg. (2 on 1 off)
Didds: on gkrieg and faust, off mathdude. (2 on 1 off)
Space (for kicks and giggles) on faust, off mathdude and gkrieg. (1 on 2 off)

If you are going to try to draw anything useful from this, you would need to look at the pairings of who was on wagons together. The issue there is that it is divided up really evenly. The only two combos that have anything other than 1 shared wagon is EFHW-joth, who were both on mathdude and gkrieg, and joth-Space, who never ended on the same wagon.

Quote
EFHW/Joth is not as likley, to me, because they are both on gkrieg and there wouldn't have been any reason to do that.

Why not? That day was weird where there was so little momentum towards any exile that it's completely reasonable to think they would both be on wagon there to make sure something went through.

Quote
And then I tried to think about the Ash kill.  Joth has been fixated on Ash D3 and D4. Having Ash as the NK took all of the wind out of his sails. I don't think scum Joth gets quite so fixated, and if he does, he doesn't nightkill him knowing he can be keep flying that flag without looking scummy. EFHW is one of the most savvy players out there. She definitely has the ability to suggest or go along with leaving Space alive to create some doubt in everyone's most towny read

This is actually a good point for town!joth, except like you say, WIFOM. Joth is good enough and has been around long enough to know that he could make this exact point as part of his defense after that kill.  I'll come back to joth later though.

Quote
Further, in addition to me, she [EFHW] has collected votes from MiX, Robz (D1), gkreig (D2), and was on Asher's short list on D4 (we no exiled). So, town has found her vote-worthy. That neither Dylan nor Joth vote for her suggests to me that she is likely the traitor.

How does that follow? EFHW was the traitor and wasn't recruited, how would either of us know not to vote there? At this point, either traitor was recruited to start the game and scum no-killed the other night, or scum shot and recruited the traitor the night of no kill. Personally, I think recruited late is more likely than no-killing there, but I don't know. If that's the case, this point means nothing.  If the traitor was recruited N0 (thus becoming part of the scum team and not a traitor), then it literally can't suggest EFHW is the traitor since there wasn't really one.

Didds, I know it doesn't sound like it, but I'm really trying not to tunnel you, everything today has just seemed off, whether in terms of cases or mindset or whatever.

Quote
Dylan's posts are super towny, but his votes are not. Further, he posts are long and have lots going on but don't actually end up exerting any influence.

You and I have nearly identical voting patterns in terms of both number of exiles on/off AND in terms of "partner" we could have been on wagon with, and this makes:

--snip--

Your observation on Dylan's votes is a stronger version of something I was also thinking.

feel extremely opportunistic and scummy.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1033 on: March 29, 2021, 02:05:31 am »

So what game plan for scum today? Bus while looking out for quickhammer chances?

Why assume busing today?
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1034 on: March 29, 2021, 07:48:39 am »

So what game plan for scum today? Bus while looking out for quickhammer chances?

Why assume busing today?
If one scum gets caught, they want to be distanced from the other one.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1035 on: March 29, 2021, 08:32:52 am »

Didds, where is your case that you are town?

I did the reread instead since there wasn’t any interest in trying to clear our own names
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1036 on: March 29, 2021, 08:50:31 am »

@Dylan-

Thanks for the careful response

I don’t have time to reply in earnest right now. At various points you say that these are not well thought out conclusions...I agree 100%. I sat down to reread, I read and wrote at the same time, and then I posted. I wasn’t mulling over thoughts or taking more time I try to connect the dots. I think that town is willing to say what they are thinking whereas I think scum have to think about it really carefully.

I know that I am town. I think that Space is town. I only need to find scum out of three.

My best guess is that the traitor was recruited on the nokill night. It makes the most sense for me. That assumptionncolors the way I see some of the wagons. The OG doesn’t know who they are trying to avoid voting with, but the traitor is trying to get found.

I have reasons for my votes. You do not have those same reasons, so locating your votes as corresponding with mine isn’t persuasive to me, although it may be persuasive to others. (I’ll find my reasons post and quote it when I’m on a computer)

The biggest takeaway I had from my reread was seeing how twisted Joth got about Ash, and how long it lasted. It took him entirely out of the scumhunting game for two days. He seems authentically baffled that no one wants to EAL and convinced that Ash is scum. I think a scum team that includes Joth keeps ash alive and guns for him hard today. I’d probably have followed him on that, so it had a pretty good chance of success. 

So, that leaves you and EFHW. My best guess is that you are the OG and she is the traitor, but it doesn’t matter.




Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1037 on: March 29, 2021, 08:59:14 am »

How do you conclude that I'm the traitor based on joth and Dylan not voting for me? Wouldn't it be more likely that one of them was the traitor?

Your thoughts on the ashersky nk are interesting, though there is WIFOM, of course.

Town!joth and I didn't/wouldn't have voted faust because we both saw him as obv!town. The other three of you are all that wagon, and I believe two of you are scum.

Your observation on Dylan's votes is a stronger version of something I was also thinking.

I have only been a traitor once and it was a disaster. I am not sure how a traitor signals, but my thinking is vote following or voting for them to try to get their attention. So, I don’t really know what I’m talking about here, but if I am looking for a follow pattern, you follow the other unknowns more than any of the unknowns follow you.

Yeah, wifom is real, but that is also the argument that scum know they can make. When I was thinking about a Joth and what he would do, the time and effort he put into the Asher case was a foregone conclusion today is Ash was still alive. We know exactly what Joth would have been doing, but now he’s thrown into disarray. Does he do that to himself? Scum might have thought that ash was either a threat or that everyone had decided his hijinks were town. As far as a threat his scum list was EFHW and Joth, which a “I’m beginning to suspect Dylan” line thrown in.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1038 on: March 29, 2021, 11:07:45 am »

It still doesn't make sense that you use joth and Dylan never voting for me as evidence that I am the traitor.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1039 on: March 29, 2021, 11:15:17 am »

I know that I am green, so I am leaving myself out of my evaluation.

Quote
Dylan's posts are super towny, but his votes are not. Further, he posts are long and have lots going on but don't actually end up exerting any influence.

You and I have nearly identical voting patterns in terms of both number of exiles on/off AND in terms of "partner" we could have been on wagon with, and this makes:

--snip--

Your observation on Dylan's votes is a stronger version of something I was also thinking.

feel extremely opportunistic and scummy.

If I had cherry picked it out of the long post, maybe. But I had several reactions to Didd's post, some in agreement, some not. I did have a weaker version of that thought. So I said so.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1040 on: March 29, 2021, 11:15:33 am »

response is inside the quote
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1041 on: March 29, 2021, 11:16:17 am »

Here are the reasons for my votes that I posted earlier:

Hi Dylan!

I forgot about the vaca. Sorry for prodding you.

I didn't and wouldn't have voted for mathdude on D1 because he is BRAND NEW to our forum and I am not about that kind of welcome.

I voted for gkrieg after faust encouraged me to look off wagon, and then I was mad at him for swaying me when the only scum read that I have had that I really believe in this whole freaking game is EFHW.  Because I was sore at him, I probably added more layers of truth-sensing to Space's case against him but Space has been my biggest townread this game. Joth is right...if they are scum they are fooling us all.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1042 on: March 29, 2021, 11:17:21 am »

It still doesn't make sense that you use joth and Dylan never voting for me as evidence that I am the traitor.

I see your following votes as traitor-y.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1043 on: March 29, 2021, 11:46:18 am »

It still doesn't make sense that you use joth and Dylan never voting for me as evidence that I am the traitor.

I see your following votes as traitor-y.

Sorry, sent before I was ready. The following votes seem traitor-y to me. The fact they didn't vote for you might mean that they were unaware that you were a scum buddy. To me, your voting pattern indicates an awareness of partnership that I don't see in Joth or Dylan's patterns.

Looking back, I see that you switched your vote from mathdude to Joth and then back on D1. So, you voted for one of those two, but I am not seeing that you voted for Dylan.  I don't have any conclusion to draw from that, I am just noting it.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1044 on: March 29, 2021, 11:49:37 am »

Unfortunately I think we have to conclude that our traitor did not signal or did not signal well, else why would scum have wasted a nightkill to recruit them? I am operating under the assumption that recruiting was an accident.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1045 on: March 29, 2021, 01:46:58 pm »

Here is the part of what you said that I am referring to:
... Further, in addition to me, she has collected votes from MiX, Robz (D1), gkreig (D2), and was on Asher's short list on D4 (we no exiled). So, town has found her vote-worthy. That neither Dylan nor Joth vote for her suggests to me that she is likely the traitor.

Now you are saying this, which is problematic in its own way:
It still doesn't make sense that you use joth and Dylan never voting for me as evidence that I am the traitor.

I see your following votes as traitor-y.

Sorry, sent before I was ready. The following votes seem traitor-y to me. The fact they didn't vote for you might mean that they were unaware that you were a scum buddy. To me, your voting pattern indicates an awareness of partnership that I don't see in Joth or Dylan's patterns.

Looking back, I see that you switched your vote from mathdude to Joth and then back on D1. So, you voted for one of those two, but I am not seeing that you voted for Dylan.  I don't have any conclusion to draw from that, I am just noting it.

Besides sounding like you think joth and Dylan are both my partners (I know you would never assert that, but that feels like the background you are writing with), now you are saying they would only have voted me if they knew I was also scum?

The "following" you are referring to is which votes exactly?

Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 1 HAS BEGUN! AGAIN!
« Reply #1046 on: March 29, 2021, 03:13:23 pm »

Here is what I mean by "following"

Vote Count 1.7:

mathdude (7): Dylan32, faust, Ashersky, Joth, EFHW, MiX, MCMC
MiX (5): gkrieg, WestCoastDidds, mathdude, SpaceAnenome, Robz888
Not Voting (0):


With 12 alive, it took 7 to Exile.
Night 1 starts now and ends Saturday, February 27th at 3:12pm Forum Time.
Night actions are due in 36 hours.


THREAD LOCKED!

Vote Count 2.Final:

gkrieg (5): faust, WestCoastDidds, Joth, EFHW, MiX
faust (1): SpaceAnenome
Not Voting (3): Dylan32, Ashersky, gkrieg


With 9 alive, it took 5 to Exile.
Night 2 starts now and ends in 48 hours. That is Monday, March 8th at 6:30pm Forum Time.
Please submit any Night Actions within 36 hours.

Vote Count 3.Final:

faust (4): Ashersky, Dylan32, SpaceAnenome, WestCoastDidds
Ashersky (2): Joth, faust
WCD (1): EFHW
Not Voting (0):


With 7 alive, it took 4 to Exile.
Night 3 starts now and ends on Wednesday, March 17th at 5:50pm Forum Time. Please submit Night Actions within 36 hours.

Wagon analysis time.

If, as ash suggests, EFHW and I are scum together (i.e. both scum were off-wagon D3), then it must also be the case that all three scum were on-wagon day 1, something that previously people have seemed to think is highly unlikely.

-snipped-

If anyone has ideas for something more useful to do with wagon analysis, let me know.

So, one way that the traitor might try to signal the baddie is by playing follow the leader. 

EFHW follows Joths vote D1 and D2 (both off wagon D3)
Space follows WCD D1
Space follows Dylan D3
Joth follows Ash D1
Joth follows WCD D2
Dylan follows Ash D3
WCD follows Space D3

EFHW is the only person who followed someone more than once...
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1047 on: March 29, 2021, 03:15:23 pm »


Besides sounding like you think joth and Dylan are both my partners (I know you would never assert that, but that feels like the background you are writing with), now you are saying they would only have voted me if they knew I was also scum?

The "following" you are referring to is which votes exactly?

Not both, but that it could have been either.  I don't think they only would have voted for you if they knew you were scum, but the fact that neither of them did might be a clue that nether of them were signaling. Of course there are other ways to signal, but I was thinking about votes as signalling.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1048 on: March 29, 2021, 04:43:12 pm »

So what game plan for scum today? Bus while looking out for quickhammer chances?

Why assume busing today?
If one scum gets caught, they want to be distanced from the other one.

I mean, yeah, but why do that today?  It's ELo, and if one of us votes incorrectly, scum just wins if they see it and pull of the exile. So why take the risk of pushing your partner? I mean, I guess from your perspective, if you think it's Didds and I as the pair, then of course we are busing each other right now, so that would make sense that you'd think that, but you'd be wrong.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1049 on: March 29, 2021, 07:07:42 pm »

I have a bit of catching-up to do. Here's a quote from Dylan in response to Didds:

You and I have nearly identical voting patterns in terms of both number of exiles on/off AND in terms of "partner" we could have been on wagon with, and this makes:

I have to disagree here. Didds made more active votes and comments during the game, and while it's not as many as EFHW or Joth, her preferences were clear at the time. Let's just sum up the five of us:

D1 Didds: voted EFHW a long time, then shifted to MiX.
D1 Dylan: mathdude. Only one vote placed.
D1 EFHW: Robz, Ash, Space, mathdude, Joth, mathdude.
D1 Joth: Didds, Dylan, gkrieg, MiX, Ash, unvote, Robz, mathdude.
D1 Space: mcmc, MiX

D2 Didds: EFHW, gkrieg
D2 Dylan: never votes
D2 EFHW: (mostly not voting, then) Ash, gkrieg
D2 Joth: Ash, joth
D2 Space: MiX, faust

D3 Didds: EFHW, faust
D3 Dylan: (mostly not voting, then) just faust
D3 EFHW: Dylan (very briefly) then Didds.
D3 Joth: only Ash
D3 Space: only faust

Dylan is definitely the outlier here in terms of usable interactions. On the one hand, it's a clever thing to do as scum if you know you're in a game where people are going to look back on wagons, but on the other hand, it makes him look like he could be scum with anyone because he's been so lurky. I feel right now that he's definitely the common denominator, but I also worry that Didds picked up on that from my posts in the previous game day about how Dylan-EFHW or Dylan-Didds felt like my top two picks, so if EFHW-Didds is the team, then pushing Dylan is definitely the way to win here.

And it is probable that this method of looking at things overcounts how likely Dylan is to be scum just because there's so little useful wagon interaction that you can't look at a particular vote history and say "oh, that seems a bit improbable if those two are scum together", which is basically how I think EFHW-Joth isn't a possibility.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1050 on: March 29, 2021, 07:56:24 pm »

Space, your previous post arriving at Dylan was something I read, but I really was trying to do a reread from scratch. I tried not to let any interactions besides my own alignment color my view.

Although I lean heavily toward EFHW/Dylan, I don’t think we can completely discount Joth/Dylan.

I’d be interested in hearing what Joth and EFHW have to say about Dylan. For all the talk we’ve been doing today, there has been very little in the way of casing building from either of them.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1051 on: March 29, 2021, 07:58:10 pm »

Unfortunately I think we have to conclude that our traitor did not signal or did not signal well, else why would scum have wasted a nightkill to recruit them? I am operating under the assumption that recruiting was an accident.

Joth, can you help me? How else would a traitor be recruited?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1052 on: March 29, 2021, 08:00:06 pm »

I hadn’t realized how scummy Dylan’s claim that he and I had the same voting record was until Space laid it out.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1053 on: March 29, 2021, 10:01:18 pm »

I hadn’t realized how scummy Dylan’s claim that he and I had the same voting record was until Space laid it out.

I didn't mean we had exactly the same voting history. I was pretty clearly looking at final wagon positions through the entirety of that post, which is what you had been talking about too.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1054 on: March 29, 2021, 10:02:09 pm »

So the goalpost moving here is definitely scummy.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1055 on: March 29, 2021, 10:14:56 pm »

So the goalpost moving here is definitely scummy.

Space is scummy for pointing it out, or I am scummy for seeing her point?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1056 on: March 30, 2021, 12:44:01 am »

Vote Count 5.2:

Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Dylan32


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.
Day 5 starts now and ends Friday, April 2nd at 5:53pm Forum Time.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1057 on: March 30, 2021, 02:42:19 am »

So the goalpost moving here is definitely scummy.

Space is scummy for pointing it out, or I am scummy for seeing her point?

Absolutely you. Space didn't say it was scummy, just that they disagreed with the point. Yes, they kind of added more to what I was saying than what I actually said, but that disagreement is not the part they seem to find scummy.

Also, Space, to your post, there are two big things I believe you are forgetting in your analysis that I think is why you are thinking I'm so likely to be scum. One is that I had a fairly long VLA through the middle of the game. Like a good chunk of D3 (I think it was D3, but time is weird).  The second is that even before that VLA, during D2, I had roughly a week where I had that big work thing that pretty heavily restricted my activity. I didn't throw votes around like I have in past games because I just wasn't around enough to do that.

I absolutely think Didds caught on to your post yesterday, and that's why ash was the target instead of you. If Didds could get you to vote me as your common denominator in your likely pairings, EFHW would be set up to hammer pretty easily without having to actually push very hard in any direction at all in case things turned against either of them. I mean look, up until the very end of yesterday, Didds was so dead set on EFHW being their strongest (only) scumread, but they never pushed in a way that actually moved any real momentum towards exiling EFHW.  And yet one of their accusations of me being scum was that I've said a lot without exerting any influence, but that's exactly what they've done regarding their whole game scumread, who now conveniently, isn't their highest priority.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1058 on: March 30, 2021, 07:56:31 am »

Dylan, I’m not quite getting how attacking me is exonerating yourself.

Your argument is that you’ve been busy so you can’t be scum?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1059 on: March 30, 2021, 09:31:48 am »

Unfortunately I think we have to conclude that our traitor did not signal or did not signal well, else why would scum have wasted a nightkill to recruit them? I am operating under the assumption that recruiting was an accident.

Joth, can you help me? How else would a traitor be recruited?

If Mafia figured out who the traitor was, they wouldn't have to recruit them at all.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1060 on: March 30, 2021, 09:38:01 am »

I'm really sorry I haven't been able to give this game the attention it deserves this game day. It's just been a busy week and I don't have it in me to spend my free time re-reading and meticulously case-making. Even though I know that I need to do that now.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1061 on: March 30, 2021, 02:56:41 pm »

Some posts relevant to Dylan

His reasons for voting for mathdude
... What was scummy about it?

Pretty hedgy, keeps option open to exile literally everyone in his first sentence. Over-aware about town PRs and subtly trying to direct their mindset on what to do with their actions. More than 2 calendar days before the deadline and advancing the idea of a lurker policy lynch. Votes for Space seemingly solely because lurker status when in his own words, “there is definitely TONS of useful interactions happening.”

PPE 1

Yeah, that was the scummiest post of the game so far... I hate breaking my personal new-guy D1 pass, but, it sounds like you’ve played enough elsewhere to not truly be a newbie, so yeah, this is fine.

Vote: mathdude

I just stumbled upon this post: hmm, Dylan was already voting for math...

I would be very much surprised if there isn't scum in faust/ash/Dylan, they all jumped on the math wagon very quickly, and right as the mcmc wagon was growing.

Vote: Dylan, I also find his play overall scummy, and it's a good SoD2 vote regardless.

Vote: Dylan32

Although I am also quite tempted to vote ash.

This sequence of posts looks pretty bad for Dylan:

Ok, that claim leads me to believe it was an indirect claim of a specific role. If I'm right, I don't think I want to unvote because it's the best of the options for scum to fakeclaim. If I'm actually wrong, I would move. So I think at this point, like Space said, you should probably just be specific.
Intent to hammer

ppe mix how does robz tie into your team theory?
I'm not saying he's right, but those last 3 messages are exactly what my meta memory has stored for town!mix, if only he hadn't brought attention to being self-aware about it with his very last line... That tempers the feeling a little bit.

ppe 2

Dylan requests more information from mathdude so he can make up his mind, then mcmc posts intent to hammer and Dylan does not unvote -  why? If Dylan truly was waiting for info then he should have made sure that mathdude could provide it.




Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1062 on: March 30, 2021, 02:58:52 pm »

Some posts relevant to EFHW

Vote: EFHW, although I disagree that EFHW is scum, I had the exact same thought about her. I don't think it applies to EFHW though, but it might, so we can follow through this.

So this is the same as an RVS vote? Go ahead, though, I like attention.

Unvote from RVS.

@mathdude, did you in fact find ashersky scummy? He's the only one so far who has pinged any scum bells for me.

Vote: ashersky.

PPE: Yeah, saw that coming...

Ash has not pinged scum bells for me at all. Why do you?

Wow. I am incapable of being that crafty.

Absolutely wrong.  You are very good as misdirection in mafia games.

Not that I see any merit whatsoever in MiX's explanation.  But still, you can be crafty when you want/need.

Her reasons for voting for mathdude
I see what people are saying about mathdude's post. It is unusually directive and it seems early to feel "torn" between a lurker exile and a mild suspicion exile.

Also, what does it mean that he votes Space to prompt greater participation when I had just done that? Are two prompting votes needed?

I know he's new, but that could be why he didn't realize his post would out scum!him. If people feel strongly, I'm ok with waiting for Day 2. Right now I'll ...

vote: Mathdude

By the way, math's at L-2 and the biggest wagon is EFHW's. Just so you know.

So EFHW is E-1?

vote: EFHW

vote: mathdude

"biggest wagon is EFHW's" I think was referring to EFHW creating the most concerning part of the wagon... not that there was a large wagon on them.
No, MiX puts a lot of pressure on me Day 1 because he thinks that's the easiest day to get me exiled. One way he does it is to make comments like this, planting the seed that I am scummy and everyone thinks so. He would do this as town or scum, unfortunately, so it's pretty NAI.

I did an EFHW re-read, and I thought my d1 impression of her was that she was at least thinking for herself and not coming over as too scummy. She does flip-flop a bit on how much sympathy she shows for our newbie's predicament, though (#188/#237/#317), which let her put her vote in a convenient place on the mathdude wagon.

Possibly more interesting is the really early game, because she followed mcmc onto Robz before Robz had even joined the game. On its own that's nothing, but then she was also right behind mcmc on Joth from #273, which is the pivot in the middle of her flip-flop on mathdude, which maybe looks a little bit more like something.

Of course, the next thing in this like of thinking is to check who else followed mcmc that much, and how common it was across the rest of d1 for two players to land up next to each other on wagons like that by chance (or design?) anyway.

No. I don't parse everything he says, because he tends to leave a lot of steps out. I'll try, but if it's too obscure I might just move on. I just know his method works for him, when he's not tunneling me, anyway, so I don't read it as scummy.

Okay.

Hey EFHW, who do you scumread currently? Who do you townread currently? Who would you vote for if you had to? What are you currently rereading? What are you doing in this Day? Cause if you have nothing to do I suggest you reread me and actually try to understand what I'm saying, it's not just rambling even if it looks like it.

I'm trying to play the game and if you just won't read my posts then why the hell do I even bother.

MiX, the reason I'm asking that of EFHW is that she's defending you and even she gives up on reading you because too much of what you say just doesn't seem to make sense.

I'm really miffed that you accused me of being "low effort" when I was asking you to clarify what you'd meant, because I think I'm one of very few people who even tried. The fact I honestly made an attempt to parse what you were saying, spent/wasted time on it (depending on whether you're scum or town here) and still came up blank should tell you that other players are not able to make sense of posts like that mathdude-joth "case".

What I think from trying to put it together following all your references is that you were accusing mathdude of being the traitor because he sheeped joth at one point early in the game, which happened at some point before the mathdude post you'd actually quoted, and you thought that the obvious conclusion from that was that mathdude was a traitor purposefully sheeping mafia!joth. You never said anything of the sort, and I'd be curious whether anyone else in-game realised that that's what you were saying (if indeed it even was?!) when you raised it at the end of do. Do you see how much clearer it could have been had you actually said what you meant?

Of course, I think there's a strong chance that either you're scum sewing this level of confusion and time-wasting on purpose, or your fixation on the traitor was your way of signalling to mcmc and his buddy that you're it. If you're scum being allowed to hide behind this scummy level of meta, though, I still think we should be calling it out as bad play so you can't hide the same way next time.

I'm townie on MiX, Space, and ash in that order.

Leaning scummy on faust, joth, and EFHW. I think EFHW is the scummiest of the three. Still waiting to see how the faust/Space faceoff goes.

Haven't heard much from Didds, although I like what I have seen her post.

Null on Dylan.

Not super strong reads though.
vote: EFHW

Rereading Day 2.

- we have the early MiX wagon where the first 3 votes are Space, Dylan, gkrieg. Not a ton to analyse; it happened quickly, and once it got to 3 votes scum wouldn't just join.
- it is notable that when MiX is at 3 votes and gkrieg at 2, Didds decides to open another wagon (on EFHW) rather than join the existing ones. This is at least consistent with scum!Didds who would be content with having 2 town wagons and saw no need to incriminate herself.
- ash throws his weight behind the MiX wagon. This is... not strictly necessary if he's scum, same reasoning as with Didds above makes ash look somewhat townier. This is also true of joth but to a lesser extent; he is more guarded about his MiX read. Anyways it feels like scum wouldn't rush into that exile, among the people who were willing to exile MiX is probably only 1 scum (though it might be that the Traitor was there and joined by the other scum). So who's not there? me, EFHW, Didds. Worth keeping in mind.
- after the MiX wagon fizzles out, gkrieg throws his support behind EFHW, who is now at 2 conf!town votes.
- then we get a ton of derailment via ash's "counterclaim" unfortunately
- after the dust settles we have votes on me, ash, gkrieg. It's interesting that despite EFHW having been talked about a good amount there is no more real pressure on her

Hmpf. EFHW comes away from this a good deal scummier than I remembered. That's my main takeaway. I still like Dylan but he just hasn't done a lot D2, so there's not much new data.

Rereading Day 2. ...
Hmpf. EFHW comes away from this a good deal scummier than I remembered. That's my main takeaway. I still like Dylan but he just hasn't done a lot D2, so there's not much new data.

I'm scummy, or the VC implies that I might be scummy? And Dylan's lack of activity is exonerating? I actually liked your point about his not unvoting. I was trying to think of how that might happen for town!Dylan, and my one thought was that he might see mcmc as a leader and therefore conform to his example. Then I remembered mcmc was scum, and that seemed even more possible.

I'm not super active (see swamped comment earlier), but I have taken positions.

vote: Dylan.

Open to Didds as well. Towny on faust, joth and Space. Annoyed on ash = undecided.

Re-reading EFHW (Print Page style).

Day 1: Votes multiple players, doesn't stick to reads, calls out a few odd plays by others, no long posts at all.
Day 2: More active in the giving reads and opinions department, didn't really hone in on anyone but me and gkrieg.  More interaction with joth than I recalled. 
Day 3: Starts on Dylan.  Wishy-washy on me.  Then WCD.  Let the faust wagon go, asked for support/clarity/etc. from Space.

Day 3 was EFHW's worst, by far.  Worth a re-read if you are looking to feel worse about her alignment.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1063 on: March 30, 2021, 03:00:50 pm »

I don't have as much for Joth

His reason for voting Robz

Ok, Robz has basically done nothing so far but townread people and ask naive questions and it's starting to feel off to me. I usually expect a little more robust mafia playing from one of the founding members of this playgroup. Maybe he's doing something different or just rusty from the time off, but I think he's trying to lay low and skate through day 1 and not making any particular effort to scumhunt.

Vote: Robz

I don't hate the mathdude wagon but it just seems too easy and I don't trust it.

All of this:

I don't think Joth has really done anything scummy.

Do you think he is just doing joth things or do you think the things hes done are towny?

Do you?

I do, joths initial votes for Dylan, gkrieg, and robz all struck me as fishing for wagons, all for generic reasons that he quickly backed off of as soon as the wagons didn’t take off. His lack of acknowledgement to the initial votes on him and then frustration/impressedness at your vote for him (which is a vote that makes him significantly more likely to be exhiled) is good scum tactic.

So I'm fishing for wagons, but when the best and most plausible wagon in the game cropped up (mathdude) I decided to ignore it? And I also passed up an opportunity to hop on the EFHW wagon after being explicitly invited to join it?

Are they both my partners? Or am I just really bad at fishing for wagons? :P

I’m not voting anywhere until I have time to sit down tomorrow and re-read, but the MiX wagon crowd is making some sense to me.

I highly doubt scum!Space pushes town!MiX this hard at the start of D2, so I’m inclined to agree Space is town (which doesn’t mean MiX is scum, but does mean I’m comfortable taking Space’s posts at face value). Potential WIFOM notwithstanding.

Mid-day, Day 2 fixates on Ash as scum. And expresses authentic frustration that no one is up for exiling Ash

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1064 on: March 30, 2021, 03:01:45 pm »

Dylan, I’m not quite getting how attacking me is exonerating yourself.

Your argument is that you’ve been busy so you can’t be scum?

I'm rapidly becoming convinced you are scum. I am not scum. The premise of this game is to find scum and exile scum. Of course you being scum doesn't inherently mean that I'm not, which is why I'm not trying to make that argument. My argument is that your push on me after I had been pretty strongly townread by I believe most people through the game once Space made that comment yesterday, combined with scum killing Ash instead of obv!town Space is a very strong narrative for scum!you.

Nope.

--snip--

And it is probable that this method of looking at things overcounts how likely Dylan is to be scum just because there's so little useful wagon interaction that you can't look at a particular vote history and say "oh, that seems a bit improbable if those two are scum together", which is basically how I think EFHW-Joth isn't a possibility.

My point is that Space's intuition there is correct. The fact I have fewer voting interactions DOES falsely point to a scum narrative for me, because it wasn't an intentional play like the paragraph before suggests it might have been. It was simply that I was busy, which should be NAI for anyone.

I hope everyone here will trust me on this statement, regardless of what you believe my alignment to be right now. I have never and will never blame in-game inactivity on IRL busyness as a cover for intentional game choices. If I say I'm busy or unavailable, it is my word as a person, not as a game player. If I give a game related reason for inactivity, believe it or doubt it as you wish just like any other claim, but I would not lie about irl things to advance my goals in a game like this. I don't know if everyone has that same standard or mindset, but to me, that goes a step beyond what I consider fair play, because we do this for fun, and I don't want to hold the real world against people.

ppe 3
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1065 on: March 30, 2021, 03:25:23 pm »

There's some low hanging fruit we haven't picked yet. For instance, who was ash most suspecting? Obvious as it is, that's very much something scum is considering with a kill this late in the game. My memory is that he was somewhat focused on EFHW, though I don't think he was the biggest fan of me either.
Were you going somewhere with this? Do you think I am scummy? I don't think you are suggesting yourself.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1066 on: March 30, 2021, 03:27:02 pm »

Dylan continues to have logical, townie posts.

@Dylan, what's your scum narrative for Didds?
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1067 on: March 30, 2021, 04:36:24 pm »

There's some low hanging fruit we haven't picked yet. For instance, who was ash most suspecting? Obvious as it is, that's very much something scum is considering with a kill this late in the game. My memory is that he was somewhat focused on EFHW, though I don't think he was the biggest fan of me either.
Were you going somewhere with this? Do you think I am scummy? I don't think you are suggesting yourself.

I don't want to make a hard accusation until I re-read and check my memory.

I more just meant "Why ash instead of space?" is a good question to be asking. And "because ash was suspecting the mafia" is a possible answer. (as is "because they wanted us to think ash was suspecting the mafia", so y'know, WIFOM reigns supreme.)
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1068 on: March 30, 2021, 05:30:42 pm »

Also, Space, to your post, there are two big things I believe you are forgetting in your analysis that I think is why you are thinking I'm so likely to be scum. One is that I had a fairly long VLA through the middle of the game. Like a good chunk of D3 (I think it was D3, but time is weird).  The second is that even before that VLA, during D2, I had roughly a week where I had that big work thing that pretty heavily restricted my activity. I didn't throw votes around like I have in past games because I just wasn't around enough to do that.

My comment was that you could believably be scum with multiple people because of your low levels of interaction. I was not forgetting that you reported a genuine reason for being away. I'm not saying you're more scummy-looking because you barely voted, I'm saying that you've left town with fewer chances to see anything not-scummy-looking in your voting history because there's so little voting history to look at.

I absolutely think Didds caught on to your post yesterday, and that's why ash was the target instead of you. If Didds could get you to vote me as your common denominator in your likely pairings, EFHW would be set up to hammer pretty easily without having to actually push very hard in any direction at all in case things turned against either of them. I mean look, up until the very end of yesterday, Didds was so dead set on EFHW being their strongest (only) scumread, but they never pushed in a way that actually moved any real momentum towards exiling EFHW.

Didds has been pushing EFHW hard all game. Can you show me any previous games in which scum!Didds does that sort of a tunnel on a scum-buddy? Or are you not saying here that you think the most likely pairing is Didds-EFHW?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1069 on: March 30, 2021, 06:22:03 pm »

Following up this comment from Dylan to Didds:

My argument is that your push on me after I had been pretty strongly townread by I believe most people through the game once Space made that comment yesterday, combined with scum killing Ash instead of obv!town Space is a very strong narrative for scum!you.

Pretty sure I started my "I think Dylan is scummy" re-read more than a game day ago.. I can see that you make logical and agreeable posts, but there's nothing that screams town. I have a feeling you were something like third behind faust and MiX in my early-D2 scumreads, because of your support for the knee-jerk mathdude quixile. So "pretty strongly townread" is probably not accurate, at least from my corner of the game.

My point is that Space's intuition there is correct. The fact I have fewer voting interactions DOES falsely point to a scum narrative for me, because it wasn't an intentional play like the paragraph before suggests it might have been. It was simply that I was busy, which should be NAI for anyone.

Ah, I disagree with that. There's no false painting of a scum narrative, there's a strong lack of painting of a non-scum narrative between you and any possible scum-partner, and I'm having to compare that with pairs for which there is evidence against them as a scum pairing, then work out which single person I think is most likely to be scum. The only thing I'm cautioning myself against is assuming that the lack of evidence against you-Didds is independent of the lack of evidence for you-Joth and/or you-EFHW. That's definitely not the case, because the lack of evidence stems from your absence in all three cases.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1070 on: March 30, 2021, 06:24:14 pm »

I'm really sorry I haven't been able to give this game the attention it deserves this game day. It's just been a busy week and I don't have it in me to spend my free time re-reading and meticulously case-making. Even though I know that I need to do that now.

Are you saying here that you're going to get round to finding that attention, or that you're feeling like it's a struggle? (Or both!?). I'm finding that the things you're throwing out there are usefully different from what others are saying, so I definitely feel like we'd benefit from more joth-thoughts if you can find the time :-)
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1071 on: March 30, 2021, 08:00:00 pm »

There's some low hanging fruit we haven't picked yet. For instance, who was ash most suspecting? Obvious as it is, that's very much something scum is considering with a kill this late in the game. My memory is that he was somewhat focused on EFHW, though I don't think he was the biggest fan of me either.
Were you going somewhere with this? Do you think I am scummy? I don't think you are suggesting yourself.

I don't want to make a hard accusation until I re-read and check my memory.

I more just meant "Why ash instead of space?" is a good question to be asking. And "because ash was suspecting the mafia" is a possible answer. (as is "because they wanted us to think ash was suspecting the mafia", so y'know, WIFOM reigns supreme.)
Yeah, I know. But you raise the question without exploring the answer, which seems odd.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1072 on: March 30, 2021, 10:01:19 pm »


I'm rapidly becoming convinced you are scum. I am not scum. The premise of this game is to find scum and exile scum. Of course you being scum doesn't inherently mean that I'm not, which is why I'm not trying to make that argument. My argument is that your push on me after I had been pretty strongly townread by I believe most people through the game once Space made that comment yesterday, combined with scum killing Ash instead of obv!town Space is a very strong narrative for scum!you.


Okay, do what the narrative. It seems like you’re saying that I’m scumming because I think you’re scummy. Who is my partner? EFHW is my most enduring scum read. Am I working with her because I keep voting for her but not convincing enough other people to follow? Or is it Joth? Who I could have followed to Ash at any time? Or Space?  I don’t see how you are putting me in a pairing that makes sense abc that alone should give you pause.

Unless you’re scum looking for the easiest misexile in which case, you’re doing great. And that is why I suspect you.

Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1073 on: March 31, 2021, 04:56:39 am »

Dylan continues to have logical, townie posts.

@Dylan, what's your scum narrative for Didds?

Also, Space, to your post, there are two big things I believe you are forgetting in your analysis that I think is why you are thinking I'm so likely to be scum. One is that I had a fairly long VLA through the middle of the game. Like a good chunk of D3 (I think it was D3, but time is weird).  The second is that even before that VLA, during D2, I had roughly a week where I had that big work thing that pretty heavily restricted my activity. I didn't throw votes around like I have in past games because I just wasn't around enough to do that.

My comment was that you could believably be scum with multiple people because of your low levels of interaction. I was not forgetting that you reported a genuine reason for being away. I'm not saying you're more scummy-looking because you barely voted, I'm saying that you've left town with fewer chances to see anything not-scummy-looking in your voting history because there's so little voting history to look at.

I absolutely think Didds caught on to your post yesterday, and that's why ash was the target instead of you. If Didds could get you to vote me as your common denominator in your likely pairings, EFHW would be set up to hammer pretty easily without having to actually push very hard in any direction at all in case things turned against either of them. I mean look, up until the very end of yesterday, Didds was so dead set on EFHW being their strongest (only) scumread, but they never pushed in a way that actually moved any real momentum towards exiling EFHW.

Didds has been pushing EFHW hard all game. Can you show me any previous games in which scum!Didds does that sort of a tunnel on a scum-buddy? Or are you not saying here that you think the most likely pairing is Didds-EFHW?


I'm rapidly becoming convinced you are scum. I am not scum. The premise of this game is to find scum and exile scum. Of course you being scum doesn't inherently mean that I'm not, which is why I'm not trying to make that argument. My argument is that your push on me after I had been pretty strongly townread by I believe most people through the game once Space made that comment yesterday, combined with scum killing Ash instead of obv!town Space is a very strong narrative for scum!you.


Okay, do what the narrative. It seems like you’re saying that I’m scumming because I think you’re scummy. Who is my partner? EFHW is my most enduring scum read. Am I working with her because I keep voting for her but not convincing enough other people to follow? Or is it Joth? Who I could have followed to Ash at any time? Or Space?  I don’t see how you are putting me in a pairing that makes sense abc that alone should give you pause.

Unless you’re scum looking for the easiest misexile in which case, you’re doing great. And that is why I suspect you.

Let me try to lay out the narrative for scum!Didds that I'm seeing right now, hopefully as concisely as possible. This doesn't quote evidence, but is just a summary of what I think has happened.

Didds has listed EFHW as her biggest scumread all game, but there has been no meaningful momentum towards that exile, despite quite a few people (including now dead townies) expressing either willingness to vote or suspicion of EFHW for most of the game.  I need to go back and read to confirm the next bit, but I suspect the moments Didds mentioned the EFHW scumread were either moments where something else was hogging the thread's attention or they were done in such a way that didn't continue to apply pressure at any given moment (i.e. "my biggest scumread is EFHW, but since there's no interest in a wagon, I'll vote XYZ instead").  That kind of read, while it clearly is taking a stand on the person, does little for actually moving town to vote for your scumread.  For comparison, she and I have been pretty constantly putting pressure on each other today.  I don't remember Didds doing at any point in the game towards EFHW.  Yes, every day (or nearly so) she included them as the top scum in their reads and at times voted, but she didn't put the same effort into securing that exile that they seem to be putting in to exiling me today.  That would be very strong partner play.  You go into the end game as distanced as possible because of the "consistent" opposition, and in ELo when only a single misexile needs to go through, continue to say your partner is scum, but specify that the other person (the unfortunate townie) is the common denominator and should be exiled first.  If you succeed in exiling the townie, you win. If you don't, you successfully exiled "your biggest scumread" and are almost assured of winning the 3 person ending on that towncred.

Because of this narrative, I do pretty strongly think the team is Didds-EFHW.  I don't have a strong read on EFHW's play, so I'll go back and read to see if this makes sense at all from their perspective.

Actually, the same narrative kind of holds for Didds' play regardless of EFHW's partner status. Tunnel a townie all game, but then push a different townie as the common denominator at ELo, and give yourself two misexile options that you can push without looking bad.  Meh, now that I typed it out the not-partner version isn't nearly as compelling, because that's just scum faking scum reads, and at that point you might as well just keep pushing your tunnel. For example, if Joth is scum and ash was still alive, that's exactly what people have described as what he would have probably done there. So if EFHW is not Didds' partner, scum!Didds makes less sense overall. So that either really raises the partner likelihood there, or it really drops it and makes EFHW-joth much more likely.  I guess I really do need to go back and read EFHW next.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1074 on: March 31, 2021, 07:52:03 am »

Ha! I forgot you would give a scum narrative for me,  too. But if you're willing to vote her, that's good enough for me.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1075 on: March 31, 2021, 07:53:20 am »

Thanks, Dylan-

A couple of things.... EFHW has been my biggest scumread and I have been vocal about it, but I haven’t been in a position to push it because she isn’t doing anything scummy. She was just not playing in her usual style. Gkrieg agreed with this, and voted there, too but Joth and faust kept doing this “reread, there is nothing there”. Which is kind of my point, there hasn’t been anything typically incisive EFHW there. Ash picked up on this and articulated it, too, but was busy with his own drama. It hasn’t been opportunistic or occasional voting. EFHW has correctly accused me of tunneling her, which I have but with good reason, I think,

I don’t see how this makes me her partner. This isn’t how I play at all. I was a scum traitor with Swowl in a game where  EFHW and pingpongsam were the scum and EFHW got exiled because Swowl and I bussed (at pps’ direction) and she got exiled D1 and it was a disaster and I quite good at learning that lesson. I’d also never be slick enough to leave Space alive. There hasn’t been anything atypical in my play, so this kind of shift from my usual meta would be huge. I don’t think there is anything to support that.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1076 on: March 31, 2021, 07:54:36 am »

Ha! I forgot you would give a scum narrative for me,  too. But if you're willing to vote her, that's good enough for me.

Has anyone else made up their mind? This seems like the scummiest thing we’ve seen yet.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1077 on: March 31, 2021, 08:01:32 am »

Ha! I forgot you would give a scum narrative for me,  too. But if you're willing to vote her, that's good enough for me.

Has anyone else made up their mind? This seems like the scummiest thing we’ve seen yet.
Really? How so?
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1078 on: March 31, 2021, 01:23:00 pm »

< snip >

Didds has been pushing EFHW hard all game. Can you show me any previous games in which scum!Didds does that sort of a tunnel on a scum-buddy? Or are you not saying here that you think the most likely pairing is Didds-EFHW?

< snip >

Didds has listed EFHW as her biggest scumread all game, but there has been no meaningful momentum towards that exile, despite quite a few people (including now dead townies) expressing either willingness to vote or suspicion of EFHW for most of the game.  I need to go back and read to confirm the next bit, but I suspect the moments Didds mentioned the EFHW scumread were either moments where something else was hogging the thread's attention or they were done in such a way that didn't continue to apply pressure at any given moment (i.e. "my biggest scumread is EFHW, but since there's no interest in a wagon, I'll vote XYZ instead").

Didds has been consistently voting EFHW for more than half the game, I think. Looking at my current voting digest (which goes up to EoD3), she was voting for EFHW for the following game chunks:
#108-#307 -- Her first vote of the game, up until she moved to MiX, which was her EoD wagon.
#445-#632 -- Her first vote of D2, up to where she moved to gkrieg, which was her EoD wagon.
#857-#910 -- Her second vote of D3 (she briefly voted faust first), up till the D3 hammer.
I don't think this particularly supports the suggestion that she was only pretending to have a scum read while voting XYZ instead for all that time.

That kind of read, while it clearly is taking a stand on the person, does little for actually moving town to vote for your scumread.  For comparison, she and I have been pretty constantly putting pressure on each other today.

To me, the real pressure in a case comes from a vote, but the fact neither of you is currently voting is absolutely fine with me, given we can't afford a mixile just now, and scum can theoretically quickhammer if town missteps. However, I do think that Didds has been voting for EFHW consistently enough that she could have expected to get herself into hot water if a townie or two had chosen to follow scum!her onto EFHW, so that amount of voting she's done seems to be a bit of a risk. Side-thought: if EFHW is townie, regardless of Didd's alignment, would we expect more people to be willing to vote there? Other than MiX in D1 and gkrieg in D2, not many people have been willing to join that wagon.

Also, you quoted my request to you that you show me previous games where scum!Didds does that sort of a tunnel on a scum-buddy, but you didn't follow through with that evidence-gathering side of things. Didds herself volunteered that she was a bussing traitor in a game with EFHW, though! Can someone provide pointers?

Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1079 on: March 31, 2021, 01:28:31 pm »

Ha! I forgot you would give a scum narrative for me,  too. But if you're willing to vote her, that's good enough for me.

Has anyone else made up their mind? This seems like the scummiest thing we’ve seen yet.
Really? How so?

Because I am town.  If you are town, and you vote for me now, the game will end. No town player is willing to vote yet, and I know what my reasons for not voting are (risks are too high, want everyone to be ready before the day ends, quickhammer will for sure happen if town votes for town) but you, apparently, share none of them.

I am not sure what has you so convinced in Dylan's survey, other than the fact that he was going to read you next to be willing to risk the game and end the day. I think you only take that risk if you are scum looking to pick up a misexile.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1080 on: March 31, 2021, 01:39:44 pm »


Also, you quoted my request to you that you show me previous games where scum!Didds does that sort of a tunnel on a scum-buddy, but you didn't follow through with that evidence-gathering side of things. Didds herself volunteered that she was a bussing traitor in a game with EFHW, though! Can someone provide pointers?

Yeah, and that game was a DISASTER. EFHW was exiled, then I proceeded to get exiled because I completely suck at lying or subterfuge. The Swan and PPS were modkilled because of posting violations. My one experiment with bussing was a hard lesson to learn.
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=17915.msg809209#msg809209
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1081 on: March 31, 2021, 01:41:03 pm »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1082 on: March 31, 2021, 02:11:02 pm »

Vote Count 5.3:

Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Dylan32


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.
Day 5 starts now and ends Friday, April 2nd at 5:53pm Forum Time. That is roughly 2 days from now.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1083 on: March 31, 2021, 05:33:46 pm »

You know what, I'm changing my tune.  The 3 of us are going in circles and space and joth are just hanging back. . I suggest we vote for joth. I'm in the process of ISOing him and will report back when I finish
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1084 on: March 31, 2021, 05:39:42 pm »

Just noticed that Space did just post. Sorry!
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1085 on: March 31, 2021, 05:49:16 pm »

Ha! I forgot you would give a scum narrative for me,  too. But if you're willing to vote her, that's good enough for me.

Has anyone else made up their mind? This seems like the scummiest thing we’ve seen yet.
Really? How so?

Because I am town.  If you are town, and you vote for me now, the game will end. No town player is willing to vote yet, and I know what my reasons for not voting are (risks are too high, want everyone to be ready before the day ends, quickhammer will for sure happen if town votes for town) but you, apparently, share none of them.

I am not sure what has you so convinced in Dylan's survey, other than the fact that he was going to read you next to be willing to risk the game and end the day. I think you only take that risk if you are scum looking to pick up a misexile.
You are making some incorrect assumptions here. For example, I am not in favor of anyone voting yet. And Dylan didn't persuade me, he let me confirm my biases. Now I think we need to shake things up. POE says someone who seems completely towny is actually not. Scum!you wouldn't be so driven to exile me, but town!you could be. It's happened before that town players feel they can't possibly trust me 😪. So sad.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1086 on: March 31, 2021, 08:34:07 pm »

You know what, I'm changing my tune.  The 3 of us are going in circles and space and joth are just hanging back. . I suggest we vote for joth. I'm in the process of ISOing him and will report back when I finish

I think I made it clear that I'd like to hear Joth's input, so yes, I'm hanging back a little (other than correcting things I think are factually wrong in the other conversation) because I think Joth was dropping in pieces of novel content in some of the recent stuff he said, and I'd like to hear more of that to help balance out my own observations.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1087 on: March 31, 2021, 08:48:23 pm »

Folks who know...Does Space work this hard as scum?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1088 on: April 01, 2021, 08:52:42 am »

Ugh. It's fair to notice that. I will just say that my lack of participation today is unfortunate but has nothing to do with my alignment. Just been unfortunately timed RL stuff. But I should be able to make time to dig in today.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1089 on: April 01, 2021, 09:20:33 am »

Ok, so I just re-read day 2 with the hopes of answering the question "who did MiX shoot?" since that seems like a good way to find the traitor, knowing what we now know.

Unfortunately, everyone that MiX expressed a scumread on day 2 has since flipped town. It's wild to me that he didn't shoot ash OR faust.

Out of the people alive today I think it's very unlikely he shot Space, me, or Didds (obviously, you'll want to look for yourself and not just take my word here). This is based on his interactions with us during the day, which, though not explicitly stating any reads, seemed to indicate town reads, and MiX isn't particularly good at hiding that stuff.

If he shot Dylan or EFHW, though, it would be a pretty out-of-left-field shot to take. But if he didn't shoot, that means scum CHOSE not to shoot either that night or two nights ago, and I just can't buy that.

I was hoping this would be a more fruitful avenue.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1090 on: April 01, 2021, 09:23:11 am »

Sorry, ignore that last part I said it wrong.

I guess it IS possible that MiX just chose not to shoot. I got confused. There was only one night without a nightkill.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1091 on: April 01, 2021, 09:29:05 am »

We basically all townread Space. How about we all abdicate responsibility and agree to exile whoever Space chooses?

(being sarcastic here... mostly.)
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1092 on: April 01, 2021, 10:26:53 am »

Finished the joth ISO, with a purposeful bias of thinking of him as scum. His day 2 is very, very towny and was the reason I didn't want to vote him. A few scummy things:
-- when he felt compelled by ash's theory that mathdude "knew" he wouldn't be killed that night. (226)
-- when he didn't believe MiX's claim (489)
-- when he said he wouldn't believe any claims at E-1. (846)
-- change in attitude about scum!ash (here and nearby )

Any other game, I'd townread him. But one of my townreads is scum. Maybe two.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1093 on: April 01, 2021, 10:43:40 am »

-- (139) joth overreacted to some votes on him.
-- There is also advocating policy voting (667). I agreed with him, but it is a way for scum to vote without making a case. He had voted and made a [weak] case against ashersky already, though.
-- Several hedgy posts (459; 828; 901).
-- (975; 1011) promised rereads. Promising rereads, especially if not fulfilled, as these weren't, is something that always makes me think scum. I haven't checked to see if the data would support that.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1094 on: April 01, 2021, 02:34:57 pm »

Folks who know...Does Space work this hard as scum?

I don't know, but I do think Space works this hard as town, so it's at best townie, at worst NAI for them.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1095 on: April 01, 2021, 02:39:00 pm »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded.

I probably can't, just because I'm not going back and looking at your scum games to find out. I don't think this is the kind of play that anyone really has a meta for, it's just something that plays out naturally. Like I don't think scum!you said, "Hey, I'm going to [insert the narrative I laid out above here]."  I think it's more likely you simply made an early decision to include EFHW in your scum reads but didn't plan on hard busing the whole game, and the game flow largely left you alone and let you maintain that stance without any real support or pushback on you until now.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1096 on: April 01, 2021, 02:43:18 pm »

Finished the joth ISO, with a purposeful bias of thinking of him as scum. His day 2 is very, very towny and was the reason I didn't want to vote him. A few scummy things:
-- when he felt compelled by ash's theory that mathdude "knew" he wouldn't be killed that night. (226)
-- when he didn't believe MiX's claim (489)
-- when he said he wouldn't believe any claims at E-1. (846)
-- change in attitude about scum!ash (here and nearby )

Any other game, I'd townread him. But one of my townreads is scum. Maybe two.

Not responding to any points regarding joth, but I noticed that your response to the post you linked was:

I think we should be seriously considering Didds today. She has really skirted under the radar all game -- hasn't done anything especially scummy, nor anything especially towny.

Posts like this make me feel like all your other posts (about me) are just bluster to rile up people against a perennially easy target for an exile.  Like, why mention any other player at this point when your other posts seem to suggest you feel most strongly that I am mafia?  You (helpfully and townfully) pointed out the importance of today's exile, so why not laser-focus on your top read?

That sounds super-close to what I was scumreading faust for d1, though, albeit transplanted to a later point in the game. Faust was a big supporter of the Mathdude wagon, but was also fishing for support for people to vote for MiX, and apparently that came from a townie place of him wanting to get rid of Mathdude, but also wanting to see a MiX wagon.

There are still two scum to find. I don't see the issue with joth having two exile candidates in mind.

So did you change your mind on that being scummy?
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1097 on: April 01, 2021, 03:27:09 pm »

Saying I wouldn't believe claims at X-1 was a tactical move. I was trying to put pressure on scum to fakeclaim early if they were going to fakeclaim, to avoid the last minute panic wagon switch that happens all the time on these forums and rarely works out well. I don't see anything scummy about it.

Not believing MiX's claim is NAI for me. If you look back at my history, I'm highly skeptical of claims and I think (and often say) that most people on this forum believe them way too easily. And I generally distrust MiX on account of finding him very hard to read.

The ash theory was bad, as I later said, and I felt bad for getting hoodwinked by it. I have no excuse. It was shiny and I was desperately looking for a case.

I don't really have responses to the other points. It's a weak case, but I respect EFHW for doing the work to make it. Also, am sorry I have not delivered promised rereads, but that's also somewhat NAI for my ADHD self.

Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 4!
« Reply #1098 on: April 01, 2021, 03:41:35 pm »

I think that, at this point in the game, basically everyone is saying adequately towny things when they post.  It's fairly easy to remain cautious and play it safe now.

As such, I think POE is the strongest tool we have left (Jorbles-style).  I think joth was making this same point.

I'm basically at joth OR EFHW, WCD OR Dylan, then Space.

Re-reading EFHW (Print Page style).

Day 1: Votes multiple players, doesn't stick to reads, calls out a few odd plays by others, no long posts at all.
Day 2: More active in the giving reads and opinions department, didn't really hone in on anyone but me and gkrieg.  More interaction with joth than I recalled. 
Day 3: Starts on Dylan.  Wishy-washy on me.  Then WCD.  Let the faust wagon go, asked for support/clarity/etc. from Space.

Day 3 was EFHW's worst, by far.  Worth a re-read if you are looking to feel worse about her alignment.

Ok, so per my comment several pages ago, here's ash laying out who he was suspecting. This is useful for me since I know I'm town, but less useful for the rest of you.

It's worth noting though, that ash IDs me and EFHW as most likely, makes a post about EFHW, and then doesn't make a post about me. I'd like to think that means he did an ISO on me and it was so towny it wasn't worth posting, but I think it's infinitely more likely he just didn't get around to it. 

Space is reasonably sure they’ll get whacked in the night, so she wants to talk it out now.

EFHW is apparently certain that she will be alive tomorrow so has no need to share her thoughts.

The former is super town, the latter is super scummy.

I think WCD's point on EFHW is valid.

As we sail to the end of yesterday, we have WCD and ash leaning in an EFHW direction, Space zeroing in on EFHW-Dylan and Didds-Dylan as most likely pairs, and Dylan and I largely uncommitted (with me having recently backed off ash)

So, supposing we need to come up with the scum most likely to have made the very unintuitive ash kill, I think it has to be EFHW (or Space). Didds-ash is a strong enough coalition that I can see EFHW being legitimately worried they could push an EFHW exile. Killing Didds would be way too obvious, given she's been tunneling all game.

Conversely, Dylan seems like the least likely person to have chosen not to kill Space (unless they're partners) since Space seemed likely to land on Dylan based on their end-of-day posts.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1099 on: April 01, 2021, 03:46:01 pm »

I also don't think it makes sense for me to kill ash, since I could have just kept tunneling him. EFHW has tried to paint my change of heart about ash as scummy, but I think it's quite towny. The tunnel would have been tactically advantageous to continue, but I backed off of it out of a sincere desire to find scum and not lean into my own biases.

If it is EFHW, choosing to kill ash for the reasons I laid out, the next question is who is the partner? If it's Didds my logic sort of falls apart, I've already ID'd Dylan as very unlikely to make that choice, and it isn't me.... so that would leave Space. Which I guess is not totally crazy if Space is just playing a really tight scum game. Of course, that means that scum HAD to kill not-Space, but the choice of ash specifically still points to EFHW.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1100 on: April 01, 2021, 03:46:40 pm »

I honestly can't tell if this case is good or trash. It makes a lot of sense to me but this whole game has been so head-scratchy.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1101 on: April 01, 2021, 05:12:16 pm »

I think you are making some sense.

I’m not sure I’m willing to convict Space yet. I think that EFHW is wily enough to kill Ash, if for no other reason than it throws suspicion on Space that has existed before. And even if Dylan wouldn’t do that, EFHW could have convinced him.

I am not sure I see that move from you/Dylan.

It would also have to be the move from EFHW/Space

I have no idea what Dylan/Space would do. Although I’m not sure she writes the Dylan common denominator post if it’s them.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1102 on: April 01, 2021, 05:42:48 pm »

Deadline is this time tomorrow.

I’m obviously deferring to Space, but I think my vote preference list is:
EFHW
Dylan
Joth
Space
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1103 on: April 01, 2021, 06:19:11 pm »

Sorry, ignore that last part I said it wrong.

I guess it IS possible that MiX just chose not to shoot. I got confused. There was only one night without a nightkill.

Were you assuming here that if MiX had shot someone, then we'd have seen two deaths from N2, and therefor that the lack of second kill means you thought that he targeted a bullet-proof traitor? I was assuming that being killed stopped him from taking a shot (i.e. that scum kills come above town kills in resolution order), but I haven't actually checked that with a mod question.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1104 on: April 01, 2021, 06:36:50 pm »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded.

I probably can't, just because I'm not going back and looking at your scum games to find out. I don't think this is the kind of play that anyone really has a meta for, it's just something that plays out naturally. Like I don't think scum!you said, "Hey, I'm going to [insert the narrative I laid out above here]."  I think it's more likely you simply made an early decision to include EFHW in your scum reads but didn't plan on hard busing the whole game, and the game flow largely left you alone and let you maintain that stance without any real support or pushback on you until now.

Huh, I disagree about not having meta for bus-related play, because I think more risk-averse people (which I'd class Didds as, since she feels like me in that respect) are less likely to be comfortable with it, and less likely than not-risk-averse players to do it aggressively.

How much of the distrust of meta is just because you don't have time to invest in looking for the old scum games, and how much is genuinely that you just disagree on whether it's something people do quite habitually? Do you believe my conclusion that Joth is really unlikely to be non-traitor scum based on the fact that mcmc voted for him hard in D1, in spite of the fact that in all the other recent scum-games I could find, mcmc really never seemed to bus?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1105 on: April 01, 2021, 06:44:56 pm »

I find it interesting that everyone except EFHW is putting forward proposed pairs where EFHW is scum now. It almost makes me not want to exile her, which isn't a good place to be this close to deadline. However, saying she's a possible pair with someone is quite different from laying down a vote, and also at this late stage in the game, probably some bussing is necessary for the final scum to stay hidden even if EFHW is one of them.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1106 on: April 01, 2021, 06:51:41 pm »

Everyone, but especially Space, do you know what your schedule looks like tomorrow? I don't want to vote until we've heard all that we/you need to hear in case of the quickhammer. Deadline is at like ten to six.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #1107 on: April 01, 2021, 06:55:14 pm »

I tracked Didds N1 and Space N2. Got a non-incriminating result each time.

If you have time you can go check. People already pointed out that I moved away from my "scum off-wagon" theory and scumread on Space today. This is why.

Given we're in a situation where we're strongly considering that the traitor wasn't recruited N0, then faust's results really need to be part of the conversation.

I also think it would be good to check the resolution order explicitly:

If mcmc had carried out the NK night 1, and was also the vig target, would his kill have gone through?

If the vig had shot at someone N2, and also been the target of the scum NK, would the vig's target have died, assuming that target had no extra forms of protection like being bulletproof?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1108 on: April 01, 2021, 07:06:28 pm »

Everyone, but especially Space, do you know what your schedule looks like tomorrow? I don't want to vote until we've heard all that we/you need to hear in case of the quickhammer. Deadline is at like ten to six.

It's a public holiday here, so I'm free! Actually, I'm so burnt out that I'm using some leave and extending the long weekend Easter holiday into a full week off next week. As for tomorrow night, I probably  have a social video call for an hour or two from about 2.30pm forum time (our clocks changed last weekend so I'm 5 hours ahead of forum time again), but I won't let that stop me being active in the run-up to deadline time.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1109 on: April 01, 2021, 07:26:10 pm »

Sorry, ignore that last part I said it wrong.

I guess it IS possible that MiX just chose not to shoot. I got confused. There was only one night without a nightkill.

Were you assuming here that if MiX had shot someone, then we'd have seen two deaths from N2, and therefor that the lack of second kill means you thought that he targeted a bullet-proof traitor? I was assuming that being killed stopped him from taking a shot (i.e. that scum kills come above town kills in resolution order), but I haven't actually checked that with a mod question.

Yes that's the assumption. That would be a weird way to mod. Resolution order usually only comes into affect with things like roleblocking. I've never heard of a game where being killed keeps you from killing that same night.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1110 on: April 01, 2021, 07:28:35 pm »

I'll be around.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1111 on: April 01, 2021, 08:30:34 pm »

A whole week off, Space!! That’s amazing!!!!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1112 on: April 01, 2021, 09:20:18 pm »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded.

I probably can't, just because I'm not going back and looking at your scum games to find out. I don't think this is the kind of play that anyone really has a meta for, it's just something that plays out naturally. Like I don't think scum!you said, "Hey, I'm going to [insert the narrative I laid out above here]."  I think it's more likely you simply made an early decision to include EFHW in your scum reads but didn't plan on hard busing the whole game, and the game flow largely left you alone and let you maintain that stance without any real support or pushback on you until now.

Huh, I disagree about not having meta for bus-related play, because I think more risk-averse people (which I'd class Didds as, since she feels like me in that respect) are less likely to be comfortable with it, and less likely than not-risk-averse players to do it aggressively.

How much of the distrust of meta is just because you don't have time to invest in looking for the old scum games, and how much is genuinely that you just disagree on whether it's something people do quite habitually? Do you believe my conclusion that Joth is really unlikely to be non-traitor scum based on the fact that mcmc voted for him hard in D1, in spite of the fact that in all the other recent scum-games I could find, mcmc really never seemed to bus?

Oh, meta definitely affects people's likelihood of busing. And I clearly think that, given how much mcmc vs joth has colored my read of joth since mcmc flipped. However, and this is something I think I've either tried to distinguish already or I've just been thinking about, there is a difference between a soft bus and a hard bus. I think a hard bus like what mcmc did to joth D1 is more affected by a player's meta/playstyle/risk-aversion, because it is a much stronger statement that is more likely to be used as evidence. A soft bus, like including your partner as a scum read is much easier to do, and is something everyone should do at times (not everytime) just as a basic skill to mask your alignment.

So I think where our disagreement has come from, Space, is that my memory was that Didds had done mostly soft busing, and the moments they hard bused were those that there was no real pressure on EFHW already, and they didn't stay there long enough to build pressure. I guess I could be wrong about that, which would push me more towards Joth/EFHW rather than Didds, but I think it's totally possible (if not probable) that EFHW started out with a soft bus, and as the game went it was just natural and easy given game flow to keep that up and increasingly add to the bus beyond what they would normally be comfortable doing.

Also, I think every good mafia player (including Didds here, because I genuinely think so) would be willing to bus in the right circumstances, because if you never do, it makes it a lot harder for your partners in late game PoE if you flip scum in the mid to late game. So even if a person normally doesn't, I'll always consider that they might. And as I type this, I realize I was leaning into mcmc's meta so much that I really need to read joth again apart from that. Ok, before the deadline, I will iso EFHW and joth myself. I will probably not post all my thoughts, but I will share my final opinions on both before voting.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1113 on: April 01, 2021, 09:23:30 pm »

I think I will be around, but I need to double check my plans to go back home for Easter and what time I need to leave.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1114 on: April 01, 2021, 09:49:42 pm »

I think I will be around, but I need to double check my plans to go back home for Easter and what time I need to leave.

Is home far away? I hope it’s a great trip. We’re taking our kid camping this weekend, which isn’t my first choice, but should be fun regardless because fires and marshmallows!!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1115 on: April 01, 2021, 11:08:12 pm »

It's starting to bug me that Dylan keeps putting Didds and me together as partners as though it were fact and not his supposition.

I'm also disappointed to see Didds putting me at the top of her scum list, still. Perhaps now that it is Day 5, you could actually make a case?

I might write your names each on its own index card and throw them in the air. I'll vote for the 1st two that land. Or maybe I should vote for the last two?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1116 on: April 01, 2021, 11:42:14 pm »

I can be on for deadline,  sporadically until 4:45.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1117 on: April 01, 2021, 11:46:07 pm »

FYI, I would absolutely have killed Space over ashersky. Their attention to detail is dangerous. And I would have wanted to use joth's tunnel to my advantage.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1118 on: April 01, 2021, 11:48:24 pm »

@Dylan, I don't understand your question at 1097.
Logged

Galzria

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 956
  • Since 2012
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #1119 on: April 01, 2021, 11:51:46 pm »

If mcmc had carried out the NK night 1, and was also the vig target, would his kill have gone through?

If the vig had shot at someone N2, and also been the target of the scum NK, would the vig's target have died, assuming that target had no extra forms of protection like being bulletproof?

I have bumped this question out to Swowl, however it IS his anniversary tonight - so I do not know that he will check in to answer, and I cannot answer for him.
Logged
Quote from: Voltgloss
Derphammering is when quickhammers go derp.

Faust has also been incredibly stubborn this game. In other news, it's hot in the summer, and water falls from the sky when it rains.


Mafia Record:
TOWN Wins: M3, M5, M6, M11, M17, M28, M32, M105, M108, M114, M118, M120, M122, DM1, DoM1, OZ2, RM45, RM47, RM48, RM49, RM55
TOWN Losses: M4, M7, M8, M9, M13, M14, M18, M31, M110, M111, M113, M117, M125, RM3, RM4, RM54
SCUM Wins: M2, M19, M23, M100, DM3, RM1, RM2, RM48, RM50
SCUM Losses: M15 (SK), M102 (Tr), OZ1, RM55

Total Wins: 30
Total Losses: 20

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1120 on: April 01, 2021, 11:57:58 pm »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded

Scum play against their metas all the time. Your past games don't prove anything. Also, it's almost like you are scum here, arguing for why I am not your partner.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1121 on: April 02, 2021, 09:02:49 am »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded

Scum play against their metas all the time. Your past games don't prove anything. Also, it's almost like you are scum here, arguing for why I am not your partner.

Nah, I’m saying that I’m voting for you because I think you are the most likely to be scum. At this point based mostly on POE. In early days it was on the nature of hire play. There is also a jumbo wall post from earlier today with quotes of the things I found scummy.

I wrote that when I was reflecting on my previous play. I went back and looked at the one time I was scum and posted about that debacle, then some third party games, and two multi ball games. I couldn’t see any evidence of the behavior Dylan suggests I’m using. I appreciate that god players are flexible, but I also appreciate that we all have orientations from which we start.

The e/EFHW/mailmi scum strong arm in Asher’s game (falling skies 2??) is as legendary in my mind as the Space Gambit and has taught me to never underestimate or predict your behavior, so the Ash kill seems well within your capabilities.

If it’s not you, then I think it’s Space and Joth in which case we’ve already lost. Gg
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1122 on: April 02, 2021, 01:09:53 pm »

If Dylan can provide any instance of me bussing as scum beyond that game, I will be astounded

Scum play against their metas all the time. Your past games don't prove anything. Also, it's almost like you are scum here, arguing for why I am not your partner.

Nah, I’m saying that I’m voting for you because I think you are the most likely to be scum. At this point based mostly on POE. In early days it was on the nature of hire play. There is also a jumbo wall post from earlier today with quotes of the things I found scummy.

I wrote that when I was reflecting on my previous play. I went back and looked at the one time I was scum and posted about that debacle, then some third party games, and two multi ball games. I couldn’t see any evidence of the behavior Dylan suggests I’m using. I appreciate that god players are flexible, but I also appreciate that we all have orientations from which we start.

The e/EFHW/mailmi scum strong arm in Asher’s game (falling skies 2??) is as legendary in my mind as the Space Gambit and has taught me to never underestimate or predict your behavior, so the Ash kill seems well within your capabilities.

If it’s not you, then I think it’s Space and Joth in which case we’ve already lost. Gg
It's not me. And I wouldn't have killed ash. I don't actually see that as a wily move.

I reread you and don't have a case. Maybe it's OMGUS. But this leaves joth, Dylan and Space. Great.

We could take a gamble and vote Space. I really feel like shaking things up somehow. And it would be great theater if we were right! But seriously, logic and intuition are both failing me.
Logged

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1123 on: April 02, 2021, 01:40:21 pm »

I feel you, EFHW.  I have no idea and no solid case on anyone. Hunches and possibilities are the straws I am grasping at.

faust had a scum read on space for about half a day, and then changed his mind.  No one has suspected them at all outside of that.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1124 on: April 02, 2021, 02:03:10 pm »

I feel you, EFHW.  I have no idea and no solid case on anyone. Hunches and possibilities are the straws I am grasping at.

faust had a scum read on space for about half a day, and then changed his mind.  No one has suspected them at all outside of that.

He suspected them enough to investigate them. I think he may have also thought they were the vig, because on Day 2 he voted them saying "now that there's no reason not to."

I'll be only only intermittently until 5.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1125 on: April 02, 2021, 02:03:56 pm »

*on only intermittently. Would vote Space or Dylan, I think.
Logged

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #1126 on: April 02, 2021, 02:36:20 pm »

If mcmc had carried out the NK night 1, and was also the vig target, would his kill have gone through?

If the vig had shot at someone N2, and also been the target of the scum NK, would the vig's target have died, assuming that target had no extra forms of protection like being bulletproof?

Killing actions resolve whether or not the player(s) carrying out the killing action(s) live or die that night.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1127 on: April 02, 2021, 02:37:27 pm »

Vote Count 5.4:

Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Dylan32


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.
Day 5 starts now and ends Friday, April 2nd at 5:53pm Forum Time. That is a little over 3 hours from now.
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 3!
« Reply #1128 on: April 02, 2021, 02:45:33 pm »

I tracked Didds N1 and Space N2. Got a non-incriminating result each time.

If you have time you can go check. People already pointed out that I moved away from my "scum off-wagon" theory and scumread on Space today. This is why.

Given we're in a situation where we're strongly considering that the traitor wasn't recruited N0, then faust's results really need to be part of the conversation.

I also think it would be good to check the resolution order explicitly:

If mcmc had carried out the NK night 1, and was also the vig target, would his kill have gone through?

If the vig had shot at someone N2, and also been the target of the scum NK, would the vig's target have died, assuming that target had no extra forms of protection like being bulletproof?

Space casually reminding us of the non-incriminating result on them is a little bit of a scum move. The results themselves are not hugely useful, as at best they tell us that Space is mcmc's non-traitor partner.

Actually, Space as the traitor makes a certain amount of sense, because that means that whatever night there was no NK it's because mafia targeted Space, who, as we said, has been pretty strongly townread all game and had just had those investigative results published to-boot. Essentially in this scenario Space is traitor who successfully fooled everyone, including their own partner, into thinking they were obv!town.

It does make a certain amount of sense.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1129 on: April 02, 2021, 02:47:04 pm »

Sorry, at best they tell us that Space is not mcmc's non-traitor partner.

Because after mcmc was killed and before scum recruited the traitor (assuming that's the reason for the no-kill night), only one scum, the non-traitor, could do the kill.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1130 on: April 02, 2021, 03:12:29 pm »

What do you think, Joth? Who’s the best choice for today?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1131 on: April 02, 2021, 03:36:18 pm »

Sorry, at best they tell us that Space is not mcmc's non-traitor partner.

Because after mcmc was killed and before scum recruited the traitor (assuming that's the reason for the no-kill night), only one scum, the non-traitor, could do the kill.

That makes sense. So with those assumptions, combined with mcmc (most likely) wouldn't bus a known partner which would mean scum!joth is most likely traitor!joth, and I think we can safely rule out a Space-joth team unless we decide mcmc did hard bus his partner D1.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1132 on: April 02, 2021, 03:37:34 pm »

Like, it's not necessarily 100% sure that it isn't them, but there's way more reason to dismiss that pairing than most other combos that we've talked about.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1133 on: April 02, 2021, 03:41:56 pm »

What do you think, Joth? Who’s the best choice for today?

I was leaning EFHW but now I'm wondering if we should all ignore our guts and go for Space.

Ugh I hate MyLo/ExLo. Love it and hate it.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1134 on: April 02, 2021, 03:42:04 pm »

Sorry, at best they tell us that Space is not mcmc's non-traitor partner.

Because after mcmc was killed and before scum recruited the traitor (assuming that's the reason for the no-kill night), only one scum, the non-traitor, could do the kill.

Are you saying that you're entertaining the possibility that traitor!me, who would have known the identity of my two scum-buddies, deliberated outed mcmc in on D1 by pushing a valid scum-case on him? And then tried not to get our newbie town PR run out of town?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1135 on: April 02, 2021, 03:44:53 pm »

Sorry, at best they tell us that Space is not mcmc's non-traitor partner.

Because after mcmc was killed and before scum recruited the traitor (assuming that's the reason for the no-kill night), only one scum, the non-traitor, could do the kill.

Are you saying that you're entertaining the possibility that traitor!me, who would have known the identity of my two scum-buddies, deliberated outed mcmc in on D1 by pushing a valid scum-case on him? And then tried not to get our newbie town PR run out of town?

You're making day 1 bussing sound like a much bigger deal than it is... I don't recall mcmc being in real danger of exile on day 1.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1136 on: April 02, 2021, 03:49:22 pm »

I think I will be around, but I need to double check my plans to go back home for Easter and what time I need to leave.

Is home far away? I hope it’s a great trip. We’re taking our kid camping this weekend, which isn’t my first choice, but should be fun regardless because fires and marshmallows!!

It's only a few hour drive, so it's not that bad. It will be my first visit back since moving right after Christmas, so I'm excited. Fires and marshmallows are hard to beat though, so have fun!

It's starting to bug me that Dylan keeps putting Didds and me together as partners as though it were fact and not his supposition.

I'm also disappointed to see Didds putting me at the top of her scum list, still. Perhaps now that it is Day 5, you could actually make a case?

I might write your names each on its own index card and throw them in the air. I'll vote for the 1st two that land. Or maybe I should vote for the last two?

I mean, I've laid out my case and assumptions, so it's not like I have claimed to be 100% certain, but there comes a point where we are going to have to decide what we think is most likely and ride with it, and most of the interactions today have made that seem like the correct pairing, hence my increasingly confident assertions.

Re: question in 1097 -
In your joth iso, you listed the linked post as something scummy from joth. However, when it happened and ash and Space called joth out because they thought it was scummy in that moment, your post that I quoted defended joth and said you didn't think it was a bad thing for him to have two exile targets in mind. So at the time you defended that post when others thought it was scummy, but now you are including that as a scummy point for joth. My question was largely just to point that out and hear your explanation.

ppe 3
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1137 on: April 02, 2021, 03:50:39 pm »

I think it's clear, but to be extra sure, the "you" I am addressing in my last paragraph is EFHW.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1138 on: April 02, 2021, 03:51:44 pm »

Here's where I'm at regarding possible pairings and possible game-states:

We had RB, Tracker, Bodyguard and Vig. This means scum took at least two roles, one of which was JOAT, which mcmc got.
I think there's a decent chance they recruited the traitor, but something like daychat is also quite possible, and could also motivate the last remaining scum to want to recruit the traitor rather than just leave them be.

Situations where scum recruited the traitor N0, anddecided to no-kill (or just forgot to kill) on N4:
Dylan-Didds: possible.
Dylan-EFHW: what was going on with EFHW's weird voting alongside mcmc?
Dylan-Joth: what was mcmc doing building a D1 case on Joth like that?
Didds-EFHW: what was going on with EFHW's weird voting alongside mcmc?
Didds-Joth: what was mcmc doing building a D1 case on Joth like that?
EFHW-Joth: GG.. all the D1 voting threw me way off, and the extra stuff Joth has been posting was creative thinking as scum. This one seems unlikely enough that I'm happy just to discount it, unless anyone can put forward a good explanation for it all.


Now going pairwise where one person is the traitor.

Dylan with traitor!Didds: possible.
Didds with traitor!Dylan: possible.

Dylan with traitor!EFHW: possible.
EFHW with traitor!Dylan: less likely.

Dylan with traitor!Joth: possible.
Joth with traitor!Dylan: less likely.

Didds with traitor!EFHW: possible
EFHW with traitor!Didds: much less likely.

Didds with traitor!Joth: possible.
Joth with traitor!Didds: less likely.

EFHW with traitor!Joth: less likely.
Joth with traitor!EFHW: much less likely.

I feel like the reads today have made me feel like EFHW and Didds don't work as well as a scum pairing, but a lot of the rest hasn't changed since the previous game-day, which is annoying.

PPE: 3
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1139 on: April 02, 2021, 03:54:53 pm »

Ok, I really don't like the shift towards exiling Space here by EFHW and joth. I mean, if it's not Didds-EFHW, that is the only other pairing that makes sense to me to begin with, but this shift definitely seems like something scum would try to pull mere hours before the deadline hoping to get me or Didds to hop on with them.

ppe 1
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1140 on: April 02, 2021, 04:14:23 pm »

Ok, I really don't like the shift towards exiling Space here by EFHW and joth. I mean, if it's not Didds-EFHW, that is the only other pairing that makes sense to me to begin with, but this shift definitely seems like something scum would try to pull mere hours before the deadline hoping to get me or Didds to hop on with them.

I don't think it's too bad from Joth, because I was specifically hoping he'd come in with some analysis I hadn't seen, and he did that, so I can't complain. EFHW taking it up too seems scummier, but at the same time, Joth's case was mostly on her, with me in the "if it's not EFHW it's them" spot, so it's also sensible for her to take that to its logical conclusion.

My worry with scum!EFHW is just that I think everyone other than EFHW has expressed a happy willingness to vote there, which gives me pause.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1141 on: April 02, 2021, 04:32:36 pm »

Ok, I really don't like the shift towards exiling Space here by EFHW and joth. I mean, if it's not Didds-EFHW, that is the only other pairing that makes sense to me to begin with, but this shift definitely seems like something scum would try to pull mere hours before the deadline hoping to get me or Didds to hop on with them.

I don't think it's too bad from Joth, because I was specifically hoping he'd come in with some analysis I hadn't seen, and he did that, so I can't complain. EFHW taking it up too seems scummier, but at the same time, Joth's case was mostly on her, with me in the "if it's not EFHW it's them" spot, so it's also sensible for her to take that to its logical conclusion.

My worry with scum!EFHW is just that I think everyone other than EFHW has expressed a happy willingness to vote there, which gives me pause.

The issue is EFHW actually expressed a willingness to go for you first, and then joth came in with analysis to support it.

#1122 EFHW randomly with no evidence says we could just go for you.

#1125 says he'd vote you or me

#1128 joth says first bit of scummy evidence on you.

#1133 joth wonders if we should all ignore our guts and go for you.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1142 on: April 02, 2021, 04:36:06 pm »

Ok, I really don't like the shift towards exiling Space here by EFHW and joth. I mean, if it's not Didds-EFHW, that is the only other pairing that makes sense to me to begin with, but this shift definitely seems like something scum would try to pull mere hours before the deadline hoping to get me or Didds to hop on with them.

I don't think it's too bad from Joth, because I was specifically hoping he'd come in with some analysis I hadn't seen, and he did that, so I can't complain. EFHW taking it up too seems scummier, but at the same time, Joth's case was mostly on her, with me in the "if it's not EFHW it's them" spot, so it's also sensible for her to take that to its logical conclusion.

My worry with scum!EFHW is just that I think everyone other than EFHW has expressed a happy willingness to vote there, which gives me pause.

There's also the fact that no matter which of us would be partnered with a hypothetical scum!EFHW partner, being the single person to say, "oh, I actually think EFHW is town," would be incredibly bad. I can honestly say, in a different game that played out like this one where it was EFHW and I, I would absolutely express a willingness to exile EFHW, and I think everyone would.

This is part of why I found Didds's play specifically scummy. Saying EFHW was the only/top scum read and then actually pushing for someone else (that happened to be me) instead at ELo was really scummy to me.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1143 on: April 02, 2021, 04:40:32 pm »

Another concern I have with Didds is maintaining the "I defer to Space." At the point we were all still assuming either Space was town or just deserved the MVP and we should look elsewhere, town!Space would have the worst PoE out of anyone, and thus is statistically less likely to actually get the correct pair. Of course, skill can overtake that, but the fact that mafia leaving Space alive might be because of bad reads at least tempers my willingness to just blindly follow even town!Space's reads. Didds's desire to do so looks like scum that did exactly that...
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1144 on: April 02, 2021, 04:48:29 pm »

Vote Count 5.5:

Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW, SpaceAnenome, Joth, Dylan32


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.
Day 5 starts now and ends Friday, April 2nd at 5:53pm Forum Time. That is in just over 1 hour!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1145 on: April 02, 2021, 05:06:01 pm »

Crap, I'm going to do my EFHW and joth isos really quick before I have to vote.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1146 on: April 02, 2021, 05:22:57 pm »

My browser is displaying that last vote count as being at 3:48:29 pm, Swowl says the game ends at 5:53pm Forum time and says that's in just over an hour. Is Forum Time actually 4:48 at the time of that post?
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1147 on: April 02, 2021, 05:24:08 pm »

My browser is displaying that last vote count as being at 3:48:29 pm, Swowl says the game ends at 5:53pm Forum time and says that's in just over an hour. Is Forum Time actually 4:48 at the time of that post?

I see 4:48 when I read it. I think the deadline is in about half an hour.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1148 on: April 02, 2021, 05:25:33 pm »

My browser is displaying that last vote count as being at 3:48:29 pm, Swowl says the game ends at 5:53pm Forum time and says that's in just over an hour. Is Forum Time actually 4:48 at the time of that post?

I see 4:48 when I read it. I think the deadline is in about half an hour.

Ok it must be a timezone setting on my PC. Thanks for that.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1149 on: April 02, 2021, 05:26:04 pm »

I've read EFHW. Starting joth iso now.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1150 on: April 02, 2021, 05:34:18 pm »

Who else is around?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1151 on: April 02, 2021, 05:34:47 pm »

I’m here
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1152 on: April 02, 2021, 05:37:18 pm »

Ok. After reading them both, I'm a bit confused.

If EFHW is scum, he's played a good game with mixing his reads up throughout the game and being hard to pin down generally. If joth is scum, he has to be the traitor. There are elements of his play that absolutely fit that role, but he doesn't at all fit as an OG scum. I've already laid out the narrative for scum Didds, but I think that came down to having EFHW as a partner. That narrative actually makes even more sense if we do go with the assumption that the traitor wasn't recruited until the no kill night, since Didds hates busing, but wouldn't have know that was a bus if she was scum and EFHW was traitor. Then it was easier to just go with the flow of the game maintaining that bus, up until today.

ppe 2 I'm obviously here, but I'm gonna have to go very soon.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1153 on: April 02, 2021, 05:39:49 pm »

Just got here. Catching up.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1154 on: April 02, 2021, 05:39:54 pm »

Cool! Any recent thoughts?

I can't quite work out why I'm scumreading EFHW for things that I'm not scumreading Joth for, but I'm still more inclined to vote there than anywhere else, given that Dylan is here and putting effort in.

Anyone got a Joth case to balance me out?

PPE 1
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1155 on: April 02, 2021, 05:42:20 pm »

We have 5 people left, meaning that we need 3 to carry an exile. Would town!EFHW be gone and not make that issue clearer to the rest of town?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1156 on: April 02, 2021, 05:44:22 pm »

Scum wants to be here at deadline as well. Though perhaps they don’t want us to know they are.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1157 on: April 02, 2021, 05:45:14 pm »

Cool! Any recent thoughts?

I can't quite work out why I'm scumreading EFHW for things that I'm not scumreading Joth for, but I'm still more inclined to vote there than anywhere else, given that Dylan is here and putting effort in.

Anyone got a Joth case to balance me out?

PPE 1

If I was making a joth case right now it would be that he is/was the traitor. At a reads list that he posted around 850, myself, Didds, and EFHW were all null, you were town, and ash was scum. Could be a very smart play to get it down to a townread that was wrong about reading him and all his null reads rather than an Ash that, let's be honest, can be completely unpredictable. But since I think it was confirmed that the traitor knows the scum team, (thanks to a question he asked), at different points his votes and support for wagons on EFHW and myself at least make (from your perspective) those less likely pairings. I don't remember if he did the same thing to Didds or not.

ppe 2
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1158 on: April 02, 2021, 05:45:50 pm »

It’s says 5 people are here, but one could be swan
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1159 on: April 02, 2021, 05:47:05 pm »

Scum wants to be here at deadline as well. Though perhaps they don’t want us to know they are.

Sure, but town literally can't afford not to be here, whereas scum can.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1160 on: April 02, 2021, 05:47:45 pm »

It's getting a bit close for comfort, and the site just timed out on me a minute ago.. the last thing we need is technical difficulties adding to the stress :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1161 on: April 02, 2021, 05:48:16 pm »

I’m ready to vote for EFHW

Any problems?
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1162 on: April 02, 2021, 05:48:50 pm »

I’m ready to vote for EFHW

Any problems?

Just that I'm still worried that too many of us are willing to vote for her! :-P
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1163 on: April 02, 2021, 05:49:39 pm »

I'm all for a good game of chicken but someone is going to have to lay down a vote here pretty soon.

I'm sort of 50/50 on Space and EFHW, though the fact that each of them is supporting the other tells me it's probably not both of them (although, stranger things have happened).

If it's Space, Dylan is looking like a likely partner based on his recent posts. Was that on the list of unlikely pairs for any reason?

But I think I said that if it was EFHW than Space was her partner, and that now seems unlikely given they're gunning for each other, although both in a somewhat tentative way. And they could be bussing scum confident that they can pull off the 1 v 3...
 (PPE a bunch)
But I guess if EFHW's most likely partner is really Space than I should vote Space either way.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1164 on: April 02, 2021, 05:50:06 pm »

Vote: EFHW
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1165 on: April 02, 2021, 05:50:23 pm »

vote: EFHW
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1166 on: April 02, 2021, 05:50:36 pm »

Vote: EFHW
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1167 on: April 02, 2021, 05:50:51 pm »

I’m about to lose service.

Space, if it’s you, good game friend

Vote: EFHW
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1168 on: April 02, 2021, 05:51:56 pm »

Wait, literally everyone was willing to actually vote
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1169 on: April 02, 2021, 05:52:04 pm »

Definitely not me, but I'm really worried about Joth's vote there.. that was too easy given that he was just apparently trying to talk himself into voting for me.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1170 on: April 02, 2021, 05:53:16 pm »

Either it was EFHW, or two of the four of us who are here have already lost, and the other two know it. Anyone going to put us out of our misery?
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1171 on: April 02, 2021, 05:53:27 pm »

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1172 on: April 02, 2021, 05:54:00 pm »

Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1173 on: April 02, 2021, 05:54:33 pm »

 ;)
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1174 on: April 02, 2021, 05:55:42 pm »

Either Didds was EFHW's partner and voted after the wagon went through to try to get towncred like look I was willing to vote...
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1175 on: April 02, 2021, 05:55:52 pm »

Or joth and I just won.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1176 on: April 02, 2021, 05:56:28 pm »

gg wp everyone.

Leaving the most townie person alive and killing an easy scapegoat for no discernible reason shall henceforth be known as the Dylan Gambit.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1177 on: April 02, 2021, 05:56:54 pm »

Damn!

Good game, y’all
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1178 on: April 02, 2021, 05:57:05 pm »

Thread Locked!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1179 on: April 02, 2021, 05:59:09 pm »

Final Vote Count:

EFHW (3): Space, Joth, Dylan
Not Voting (5): WestCoastDidds, EFHW


With 5 alive it takes 3 to Exile.

EFHW has been exiled!
They were EFHW, the Vanilla Townie.


Thread Unlocked!
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1180 on: April 02, 2021, 05:59:41 pm »

We wouldn’t have been able to win without EFHW here anyway. That helps

I was just telling husband what happened and his response was “you have a soft spot for Joth”. True enough.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Swowl

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
  • Shuffle iT Username: Swowl
  • Snow.Owl.Duh.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1181 on: April 02, 2021, 06:01:05 pm »

The Game has ended.

Skum team of MCMC, Dylan + Traitor!Joth Wins!

Thank you all for playing!

You may feel free to post your personal QTs if you wish.


Skum QT - https://www.quicktopic.com/53/H/dtFPz88SjgUW4

Speccy - https://www.quicktopic.com/53/H/SiUGAA7VugGi
Logged
Jesus how did i fuck that up
real good. That’s how
Town:  14 wins, 14 losses (1 MVP)
Skum: 7 wins, 7 losses (1 MVP)
3-Party: 4 wins, 1 loss

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1182 on: April 02, 2021, 06:02:26 pm »

Thanks, Swan!! ❤️ you!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1183 on: April 02, 2021, 06:02:44 pm »

We wouldn’t have been able to win without EFHW here anyway. That helps

I was just telling husband what happened and his response was “you have a soft spot for Joth”. True enough.

I promise I wasn't trying to exploit it! :D
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1184 on: April 02, 2021, 06:03:38 pm »

Great game. I feel like it's been a while since I've survived into an endgame and I forgot how much fun they are. Though also nervewracking. For both sides.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1185 on: April 02, 2021, 06:04:16 pm »

Also, for the record, all three scum were on the mathdude wagon. So the next time someone says "scum wouldn't", just remember M134.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1186 on: April 02, 2021, 06:06:00 pm »

Guess who I would've shot if I was planning to shoot.....god dangit Dylan!

mcmc nailing on joth is so funny in retrospect.

Hey I get to blame Space for making bad decisions in retrospect, wooooo! Although I would've voted for EFHW there too :P
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1187 on: April 02, 2021, 06:10:21 pm »

Oh...and what happened for the game to be cancelled the first time??
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1188 on: April 02, 2021, 06:12:14 pm »

some real gems in this speccy
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1189 on: April 02, 2021, 06:15:24 pm »

Quote
Mine? Tough call.

I would have leaned joth -- surviving this long, lack of hunting past me for a long time...but I agree that it seems unlikely he shoots me. EFHW maybe?

(that's ash in the speccy)

Makes me feel reeeaaaalll good about killing you.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1191 on: April 02, 2021, 06:22:39 pm »

some real gems in this speccy

MiX always wanting to see me dead!
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1192 on: April 02, 2021, 06:24:11 pm »

some real gems in this speccy

MiX always wanting to see me dead!

You and Space hammered tracker!faust, I had no compassion left for either of you after that. And I knew Space was town, so it was fine if you were exiled.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1193 on: April 02, 2021, 06:24:59 pm »

So game one, I got bodyguard QT, but was announced as IC in thread.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1194 on: April 02, 2021, 06:25:34 pm »

Guess who I would've shot if I was planning to shoot.....god dangit Dylan!


<3
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1195 on: April 02, 2021, 06:27:17 pm »

But great game everyone. Even at the very end, basically up until EFHW didn't show and Didds said they were gonna vote there, I really thought it could go either way.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1196 on: April 02, 2021, 06:28:33 pm »

Sorry about the no show! Well done Dylan and joth!
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1197 on: April 02, 2021, 06:29:08 pm »

Just looked at joth's QT, and man you were right about MiX if he had decided to shoot lol. For what it's worth MiX, I thought I would be high on your potential list, which is why I made sure to go for you instead of playing wifom and hoping you took out a townie lol.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1198 on: April 02, 2021, 06:29:51 pm »

Robz and I were the scum in the first go 'round, with Space as traitor.
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1199 on: April 02, 2021, 06:32:56 pm »

Just looked at joth's QT, and man you were right about MiX if he had decided to shoot lol. For what it's worth MiX, I thought I would be high on your potential list, which is why I made sure to go for you instead of playing wifom and hoping you took out a townie lol.

It's fine, I was dead either way. I just didn't want town to not have to actually go through a day to kill scum, like mcmc. Me killing mcmc meant basically no one had an opinion on him and besides joth (lol!) we couldn't say much about his interactions with anyone. I was hoping scum would've been exiled during the day, and that would've helped town kill the last scum. But instead they killed faust.

Of course I did get one good read off mcmc, my townread on Space, but it was so contested that it took a tracker for them to be quasi-IC, so you know.

I hate/love saying this, but I did actually have the best reads this game, I feel. That should count for something, right?
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1200 on: April 02, 2021, 06:38:31 pm »

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That was a confession and I missed it!
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1201 on: April 02, 2021, 06:41:02 pm »

Sorry again. I fell asleep. Long day.
Logged

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 5!
« Reply #1202 on: April 02, 2021, 06:44:28 pm »

gg wp everyone.

Leaving the most townie person alive and killing an easy scapegoat for no discernible reason shall henceforth be known as the Dylan Gambit.

I resent the "no discernible reason" part of this lol. I had a lot of reasons for it. Namely, the layers of reasons that we both had to either leave ash alive or to kill Space instead, thus making it an incredibly unlikely thing either of us would do. Also, we could name it The Second Space Gambit, since rather than inventing the gambit, Space was herself the gambit lol.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1203 on: April 02, 2021, 06:52:20 pm »

I think I managed to suspect everyone but the actual scum team.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1204 on: April 02, 2021, 06:54:33 pm »

I think I managed to suspect everyone but the actual scum team.

No, no, don't you dare weasel out of helping me kill mcmc. You were invaluable in my vigging decision!


Oh, by the way, this is my last post in my QT, in N2:

"I just had a dream where a bunch of people were replaced, including ash being replaced by mcmc and joth by e, then we exiled ash/mcmc for having been scum and e just surrendered. I guess my subconscious scumreads joth?"

Dream!MiX compliments Vig!MiX well, I suppose.
Logged

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1205 on: April 02, 2021, 07:05:48 pm »

Well done Joth especially.. Dylan was high up my scumreads, and I had so nearly wanted to push there instead, but Joth was pretty much the towniest of the bunch remaining, as far as I could see.
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

SpaceAnemone

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91
  • Shuffle iT Username: SpaceAnemone
  • Correct Horse Battery Staple
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1206 on: April 02, 2021, 07:24:57 pm »

Also, for the record, all three scum were on the mathdude wagon. So the next time someone says "scum wouldn't", just remember M134.

Yeah, I spotted that! Usually I'm the one pushing more than anyone else for looking at things that don't look like "normal" voting patterns in wagon analyses, whereas this game I was actually scureading faust for saying there was likely to be an off-wagon scum, just because I had such strong feelings about how the EoD1 had gone down.

I can kind in retrospect how faust would scumread me for that in return, though, because apparently even the scumteam read more into my EoD1. Honestly, I was just trying to optimise the amount of information available for town in the game, and not jump to rash conclusions with a newbie in our midst.

Also, thank you Robz for the save!! Sorry I couldn't avenge your death :-(
Logged
Congratulations! Your SpaceAnemone evolved into UniverseAnemone!
Town games: M84(L), M85(W), M86(L), M87(W), M88(L), M90(L), M92(W), M94(L), M97(L), M99(W), M100(L), M104(W), M107(W), M110(L), M112(L), RMM37(L), RMM40(D), RMM41(L), RMM43(L), RMM47(W), ZM23(W).
Scum games: M89(D), M108(L), NM8(W&MVP), NM10(L)   Mod: NM9, RMM38, RMM42.   Pronouns: they/them

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1207 on: April 02, 2021, 07:29:54 pm »

I'm going to take notes on joth's Day 2.
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1208 on: April 02, 2021, 09:40:23 pm »

Also, for the record, all three scum were on the mathdude wagon. So the next time someone says "scum wouldn't", just remember M134.

This.  This is what I was trying to say.
Logged

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1209 on: April 02, 2021, 09:50:56 pm »

I found the traitor role to be very freeing. My reads were fake, but my interactions were genuine, which made the game like 50% easier, if that makes sense.
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1210 on: April 02, 2021, 09:51:11 pm »

gg everyone!
Logged

mathdude

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1211 on: April 02, 2021, 09:55:55 pm »

Oh...and what happened for the game to be cancelled the first time??

Something really unfortunate...

So game one, I got bodyguard QT, but was announced as IC in thread.

And I was IC, but you got announced in thread.  If only we could have played out that game instead - then at least I wouldn't have been exiled D1!  (Maybe night-killed in the absence of a bodyguard though).

Also, it's good to see I had the right place to vote D1 before I disappeared.  If only Town had looked where a conf-town (me) had voted, they could have picked Dylan off.  (My initial RVS D1 vote was a reference to the fact that I was IC in the cancelled game 1 instead of Dylan who was actually announced, but Dylan's response really did rub me the wrong way and I had strongly suspected him of being scum!)
Logged
he/him

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1212 on: April 03, 2021, 04:07:55 am »

Good game!
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3384
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1213 on: April 03, 2021, 09:29:06 am »

This was painful. At least I can still read EFHW accurately.
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1214 on: April 03, 2021, 12:16:39 pm »

What an awesome game!

The first full phase of this game was crazy from a mod perspective! Scum JOAT hard tunneling on the traitor who he figured was a vanilla townie, scummily hammers the town roleblocker who he thought was unfortunately the traitor! Then I target space who I think is the town vigilante that gets protected by robz the town bodyguard all when getting shot myself by the actual town vigilante!
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1215 on: April 03, 2021, 03:16:02 pm »

What an awesome game!

The first full phase of this game was crazy from a mod perspective! Scum JOAT hard tunneling on the traitor who he figured was a vanilla townie, scummily hammers the town roleblocker who he thought was unfortunately the traitor! Then I target space who I think is the town vigilante that gets protected by robz the town bodyguard all when getting shot myself by the actual town vigilante!

I'm glad I'm the one participant in those interactions that was correct on my assumptions :P Although Robz was correct on who was being NK'd though.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1216 on: April 03, 2021, 11:54:48 pm »

Glad my read of joth was right the whole time, at least.  Dylan convincing him to shoot me was genius.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

jotheonah

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1217 on: April 04, 2021, 10:13:28 am »

Glad my read of joth was right the whole time, at least.  Dylan convincing him to shoot me was genius.

Do you think town wins if we go for the Space kill?

I think there's an interesting generalized question for scum here: Do you shoot the townie with the best reads or the one who is best read?
Logged
"I know old meta, and joth is useless day 1 but awesome town day 3 and on." --Teproc

He/him

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1218 on: April 04, 2021, 10:15:58 am »

Glad my read of joth was right the whole time, at least.  Dylan convincing him to shoot me was genius.

Do you think town wins if we go for the Space kill?

I think there's an interesting generalized question for scum here: Do you shoot the townie with the best reads or the one who is best read?

The first one. A townie that is best read that does not have the best reads is what wins scum games.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Day 2!
« Reply #1219 on: April 04, 2021, 12:40:38 pm »

This is funny in retrospect
I agree that town!ash would also be able to pinpoint 1 scum in 3 players. But scum!ash can also know both scum: if he's a traitor, for example.
Wait, the Traitor knows who the mafia are? Where did you obtain this information?

It's in the "standard" definition of traitor on mafiascum so I've just been assuming it's true here.

Swowl, can you confirm that a traitor, if there is one, would know who their partners are?
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1220 on: April 04, 2021, 10:12:53 pm »

Glad my read of joth was right the whole time, at least.  Dylan convincing him to shoot me was genius.

Do you think town wins if we go for the Space kill?

I think there's an interesting generalized question for scum here: Do you shoot the townie with the best reads or the one who is best read?

I go with the latter -- I think keeping mis-exile options available is the most important.

As for town's chances if you left me alive...I do believe I would have been pushing for you or Dylan, although EFHW was always your best possible mis-exile.  So the question is, do you think you convince one townie to vote with you and Dylan for me, or do I convince everyone else to vote one of you two (possibly with your help if you decide to bus)?

I can't say whether your chances for victory go up or down in that scenario.  I think removing me from the options helped consolidate voices on an "easier" option for mafia.  Backing off further from me while I was still alive was always going to be risky for joth; by me not being around, it was easier to shift.

Clearly, it was the right play here anyway.  Good job, well played.
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M134: Conference Call Mafia V 2.0 - Game Over - Skum Wins!
« Reply #1221 on: April 05, 2021, 09:24:28 pm »

Yeah, killing you feels like it framed me so hard right there, but it's a case where the WIFOM and too obviously scummy to be scum defense could make town pause there. This is why in my last couple town games, I've fought against that argument so much lol.

Also, nobody caught it, but I was so afraid I scumslipped in the mod question hard at the end when I mentioned the game ending instead of the day ending, because a townie is hoping to get it right and keep the game going so it's only the day that ends, but scum wants to "get it wrong" and end the game, and town noticing my default assumption there would have left me high and dry lol. Phew.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 49 [All]
 

Page created in 1.024 seconds with 19 queries.