If it ain't Eddie,
vote: GreathallscoutI want to bring up a key point that I think may have been lost.
Read this progression. Here, GHS clearly implies that his townread on joth has something to do with joth's sincerity regarding no-lynching.
These are my current thoughts as a reread people. not all at once since theres so many. so i will update. And it helps me get clarity with so many people.
Mix, joth(i think their no-lynch seemed sincere even though i disagree) and Cavie seems the most town to me.
Then, when I bring up that this is not a good reason to townread joth, he pivots:
mmm vote: GreatHallScout
this feels like a faked readlist
1) the sincerity of joth's no lynch suggestion is a poor reason to townread him. after all, he has stated that he posted it to fish for reactions.
1) I must've missed where joth said they did it for reactions. I wasn't saying that's why i think they are town just that i didn't think it was scummy. i think he is town mostly because he directly pointed out the "game design flaw"
Why this pivot? It doesn't make sense to me from a town standpoint. faust has dismissed this concern as standard noobishness, but I disagree. Why would town give one reason for townreading someone, then switch to a different one, and, crucially,
deny that they were ever townreading joth for the first reason in the first place?This thought process, to me, reeks of scum deciding "Yes, this is my fake read on someone" and then changing the reasons for the read when challenged, because he has already decided on a read that he wishes to present.
His explanation for why he did this doesn't clear things up for me:
1)I probably could have phrased it better- i guess i thought it was obvious why I thought joth was town since other people responded that they were town after the house-issue. I felt the need to explain why i thought i didnt care too much for the No lynch since some players seemed it was bad enough to think he is scum(that was the parentheses part).
It just sounds like more made-up justification. "I thought it was obvious why I thought joth was town" is just a wild thing to say, in particular. in context. Think about what this means.
He's saying he thought it was so obvious that he was townreading joth for pointing out the game design flaw, that he didn't need to state that in his readlist. Not only that, he thought his reasons were so obvious, that he could put something else in parentheses, after joth's name, and that the reader would somehow know that the stuff in parentheses was
not evidence for his townread.
This is just too much. I don't believe this explanation. He just pivoted and got confused because his townread wasn't genuine. He's scum.