1) As has by now been pointed out by others, MiX clearly lied about the possibilities regarding the setup.
The only lie I see, apart from not telling people my read on Dylan, is not saying that there could be 6T rolls. Where were the "other lies" pointed out? I can't see them.
Okay, I will break it down for you, although again, this has been pointed out by others. Here is your post:
I'll be the dumb one and ask for the logic of mass claiming but will already say I am all for it cause it is fun. But have a feeling a bunch of people will be up in arms without the math or talking about it forever. Sooo.... VT
It's very simple. A goon flip means we're in 5 or 6 Ts scenario, which means we have a maximum of 1 PR. Since we have a 1-shot cop claim, that's all the PRs possible, which means any more non-UB claims are a counterclaim, and we definitely want those. That's all. We hide the UB because we only need them to claim a day before LyLo, where scum can't claim it safely. When UB claims and etc is complicated, but the massclaim of non-UB isn't.
I quoted this and voted you for the scumslip and lie. A few points to make:
#1 - You have tried to cover up your lie by saying you omitted the 6T roll. It's even in the post I am replying to now. That is yet another misdirect, as we can see CLEARLY that you said "6 Ts" in your post. So, where did you omit the 6T roll? That's a compound lie -- a lie building on a lie to cover up the first lie. Lies abound!
#2 - The original misdirect/lie in your quote, which led to my clear read on you, was when you said "we have a maximum of 1 PR." You want this to be true because the game environment has been molded to appear that way. (I will note, I believe this to be the true game state at this time, which is days later than this post.) However, your statement is blatantly untrue, and I believe it to be blatantly untrue on purpose.
#2a - Why is MiX's line untrue? MiX predicates his statement on the goon flip. A goon flip means 5T or 6T, as he says. So he uses a truth to lull the audience, then slides in a seemingly true statement that is actually a lie, reinforced by immediately hitting the next line to support it ("since we have a 1-shot cop claim"). Note the use and placement of the word "since" in this series. Meaning-wise, it is used as a "because" for the info that follows (there are no other PRs possible BECAUSE we have a 1-shot cop claim), but its positioning means that readers may also meld it with the previous line -- the lie. That is, "we have a maximum of 1 PR BECAUSE we have a 1-shot cop claim," which just feels like evidence, even though it isn't. This is a common language trick used in poetry and other writing (rap lyrics do it all the time).
#3 - As I've explained, scum planned a fakeclaim. Scum knows the claim is fake. The fake claim is for one PR, even though that is not the only possibility in the setup. In this case, scum ignored all possibilities to push the only possibilities that work with their lie. That is the scumslip.
#1 - Why would I cover up a lie with a lie. On purpose. While knowing what I'm doing. You can say you caught me with my pants down, but you can't say you caught anything scummy, you just deconstructed my memory of events in a way for me to contradict myself. For which I say, well done, I didn't think that was possible.
#2 - But we DO "have a maximum of 1 PR". I wasn't thinking about the masons, because that's a total for 1 PR, as the UB is replaced by a mason. Not to mention a mason claim solves this day so there's no need to mention it. Is there any other scenario where we don't have a maximum of 1 PR, prior to the massclaim?
#2a - You never explained why that line is untrue. You just explained how I wrote the paragraph. Which, uh, yeah I guess I did say "since" after a conclusion. It was not my intent to link those two together backwards, only forwards. Again, why is it not true?
#3 - If scum scumslipped, then yes, it was by knowing that there was a fakeclaim before raptor claimed. I did no such thing? I assumed the only thing that could happen after a massclaim, which is either nothing happens, or something happens. Acknowledging the one thing that can happen due to the massclaim isn't scummy.
PPE I'm getting tired of this. I still don't know how I lied about the setup, and I still don't know why that makes me scum. Just because I'm the only one that could've scumslipped about this (let's assume that for a bit since I didn't see any other scumslip) doesn't mean I did.
Also, Didds...really. Really. I thought better of you...