If you're townie, and we've caught Ash in a scumslip because he didn't know that the SK was fully bulletproof, then it seems like you have a strong incentive to vote for Ash.
So many IFs. Might I suggest a re-think? You can’t catch scum claiming scum in a scumslip. You (especially you) should be considering how much of my claims were true, not how much were lies, and decide if the risk is worth it.
It's one single conditional, and that's on whether raerae is town. If she's town, there's a
strong argument for her voting for you.
The rest is fact, it just depends on whether you classify SK as "scum" for "scumslip" or not. I asserted that we've caught you in a scumslip, meaning that we've caught you in a lie only Maquis would tell. It's clearly a lie because your narrative contradicted a mod-given piece of information. You've agreed yourself that there are a limited number of scenarios you've named where this might have happened, all of which involve active deception. By far and away the most likely reason for you to have done that is that you're Maquis fighting to save yourself from the lynch.
The fact that you then threw out a "likely Maquis pair" that included me shows that you haven't really been buying into the genuine Maquis-hunting going on here, because the people who're actively hunting will remember that EFHW cleared me.
PPE 5