I disagree with the format, usually the person who goes first should get to also speak last, since they don't get a chance to make counter arguments to cases made before in-line, unlike every other player. Perhaps it's just the towniest of the towns get's to go first because they are useless.
Alright, Here's the game we are playing right now. We're playing "assume there are 3 scum and pick them". Reasons would be nice, but I'm not asking for (or wanting) entire cases right now.
DebatePro
Team Town:Debatepro - Town - I've made an emphatic defense over multiple days, open book with every decision, and my thinking.
silverspawn - Town - Defends MiX in D1 & doesn't vote DS in D2. What more town cred do you need.
raerae - Town
shraeye Town
UncleEurope - Null-town
Team Not-Town:Then Arishipshape. Scum - I'm inclined to believe SS and the case against him. If he is the pawn sacrifice, maybe we should take it.
faust - Scum - I find it interesting he asserted SS could be pulling a pawn sacrifice (
#1637 &
#1651) 15 posts into D2 (dubious) only to do it himself in
#1660, classic projection. Also as soon as Mail-Mi voted Ari and Faust signaled his intent to hammer DS in the next post
#1456. Again, why is he still alive, the mason kill in N1 i get, but I disagree that mail-mi was a bigger threat to scum, if faust was town.
EFHW .6 Scum - I thought the "let me find the post" and then like 8 minutes later she found it sketch plus what raerae said
#1655.
joseph .4 Scum - I question the overselling the MiX wagon as scummy af and it's so clear he was town when the masons were on Mix as careless. See
#1167If you made me pick between Joseph and EFHW right now, I'd probably vote for EFHW because I find tension with the analysis and claims. However, I also recognize I probably shouldn't have played a closed game for my first one.