Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[EFHW]

This is a terrible case. vote: DatSwan

The mafia bible agrees with you. And so do I.

And just to be clear, I also reread DatSwan and LaLight and I find both of them to be scummy.

vote: DatSwan

That's not a super convincing argument since he is also FOS'ing LL in the same post.

Ok. Unless you want to dismantle your own argument, my vote stands.

I like my argument. Your post sort of "damns it with faint praise."

[jotheonah]

Vote Count 2.3


arishipshape (3): silverspawn, Uncleeurope, Debatepro
DatSwan (3): faust, EFHW, arishipshape
Debatepro (1): Joseph2302
EFHW (1): DatSwan

Not Voting (3): mail-mi, raerae, shraeye

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Day 2 ends February 11, 2019, 05:00:00 pm

[arishipshape]

This is a terrible case. vote: DatSwan

The mafia bible agrees with you. And so do I.

And just to be clear, I also reread DatSwan and LaLight and I find both of them to be scummy.

vote: DatSwan

That's not a super convincing argument since he is also FOS'ing LL in the same post.

Ok. Unless you want to dismantle your own argument, my vote stands.

I like my argument. Your post sort of "damns it with faint praise."

Touche.

[shraeye]

I am not ignoring this - I am also not answering it now. A lot has happened between now and then and I think it is best to wait before my reasons are known.

Disagree.  I'm waiting on those reasons.

[shraeye]

I don't think on/off wagon is a useful distinction for scumhunting today.

Agree; my loud-mouthness probably has ruined that distinction fairly well.  It was equally easy to agree or disagree with me for legitimate reasons; looking at people's individual reasoning would still be useful, but just saying "MiX was town, scum was on it" or "it looked like a dangerous position, scum was off it" doesn't really apply.

[shraeye]

This is a terrible case. vote: DatSwan

The mafia bible agrees with you. And so do I.

And just to be clear, I also reread DatSwan and LaLight and I find both of them to be scummy.

vote: DatSwan

Yeah......chapter 1 of the "bible" says LaLight is suspicious.  Chapters 2-6 are why I'm scummy. 

Maybe it's time to lay off that religious fervor a bit....

[arishipshape]

This is a terrible case. vote: DatSwan

The mafia bible agrees with you. And so do I.

And just to be clear, I also reread DatSwan and LaLight and I find both of them to be scummy.

vote: DatSwan

Yeah......chapter 1 of the "bible" says LaLight is suspicious.  Chapters 2-6 are why I'm scummy. 

Maybe it's time to lay off that religious fervor a bit....

But I gave my word I would make it my mafia bible! What am I gonna do, break my word like scum would?

[mail-mi]

So I haven't really been following, but didn't ari make some big post near the end of day 1 why his (her) read was changing on MiX? I can see that as pushing a mislynch and is a good place for my (albeit unhelpful) vote here: vote: ari

[shraeye]

Nah, no ari. 

Ari's a good guy.

[shraeye]

Just to be clear, nobody's getting lynched until I post what combined shraeye/LaLight Night1 reads were.

Then I invite everybody to think and analyze what Day2 discussions contribute to that.

[raerae]

Just to be clear, nobody's getting lynched until I post what combined shraeye/LaLight Night1 reads were.

Then I invite everybody to think and analyze what Day2 discussions contribute to that.

When you planning on doing that?

[raerae]

I am not ignoring this - I am also not answering it now. A lot has happened between now and then and I think it is best to wait before my reasons are known.

I'm pretty sure we're over this whole "I'm keeping my reads secret for reasons I'm definitely never going discuss later."

[shraeye]

Tomorrow.  Speaking of keeping secrets, me and LaLight agreed that whoever lived (probably me) would not post reads straight off.  I definitely wanted discussion to unwind instead of people waiting for me, then just sheeping our opinions.

Discussion has mostly occurred; tonight or tomorrow is a perfect time to inject the LaShraeye reads, generate more discussion, help us settle on a lynch before the super-last minute.

[shraeye]

Hah.

shraeye: "tomorrow....wordswordswords...tonight or tomorrow"

#scumtell

[Uncleeurope]

I just want to avoid last day scrambling, if possible. We don’t have nearly as much time as we are thinking. (Well, as I am thinking, at least)

PPE: 2

 What he said.

[EFHW]

This is a terrible case. vote: DatSwan

The mafia bible agrees with you. And so do I.

And just to be clear, I also reread DatSwan and LaLight and I find both of them to be scummy.

vote: DatSwan

Yeah......chapter 1 of the "bible" says LaLight is suspicious.  Chapters 2-6 are why I'm scummy. 

Maybe it's time to lay off that religious fervor a bit....

But I gave my word I would make it my mafia bible! What am I gonna do, break my word like scum would?

Be inconsistent and change your mind, like town.

[EFHW]

Just to be clear, nobody's getting lynched until I post what combined shraeye/LaLight Night1 reads were.

Then I invite everybody to think and analyze what Day2 discussions contribute to that.

So you are officially claiming IC now, not just taking on the responsbilities.

[EFHW]

So I haven't really been following, but didn't ari make some big post near the end of day 1 why his (her) read was changing on MiX? I can see that as pushing a mislynch and is a good place for my (albeit unhelpful) vote here: vote: ari

Couldn't you look it up first? He did the opposite.

[arishipshape]

So I haven't really been following, but didn't ari make some big post near the end of day 1 why his (her) read was changing on MiX? I can see that as pushing a mislynch and is a good place for my (albeit unhelpful) vote here: vote: ari

How was any of my super late day 1 posts pushing for a lynch of MiX?
PPE 1 exactly.

[Debatepro]

So it is possible to answer that, but not the post immediately afterwards?Vote: DatSwan

In #492 you made a case that EFHW wasn't getting enough scrutiny for list of actions you found suspect. Did your opinion change before #1042-#1045?

[faust]

Nah, no ari. 

Ari's a good guy.

Would have been too eerie if we agreed on everything.

[faust]

So it is possible to answer that, but not the post immediately afterwards?Vote: DatSwan

In #492 you made a case that EFHW wasn't getting enough scrutiny for list of actions you found suspect. Did your opinion change before #1042-#1045?

No, after.

[Debatepro]

So it is possible to answer that, but not the post immediately afterwards?Vote: DatSwan

In #492 you made a case that EFHW wasn't getting enough scrutiny for list of actions you found suspect. Did your opinion change before #1042-#1045?

No, after.

Was it a trap?

[faust]

So it is possible to answer that, but not the post immediately afterwards?Vote: DatSwan

In #492 you made a case that EFHW wasn't getting enough scrutiny for list of actions you found suspect. Did your opinion change before #1042-#1045?

No, after.

Was it a trap?

No, but it kind of worked out that way.

[raerae]

Real quick reads list before shraeye does his thing. I've put people in buckets but in no particular order. I've got some very disorganized buckets.

Townie:
shraeye
faust
silver
ari

Middlings:
EFHW
mail-mi
Eddie
Debate

Scummy:
DS
Joseph