DatSwan, I think you're confusing certain elements here.
a) Andrew inherited Cop, not Tracker. He didn't claim you "didn't go anywhere" on N2, he claimed he got a Town result on you. Regardless... you claimed VT, remember ? Town knows exactly what you did each night because you told them in the thread.
b) All claims are safe claims for scum. VT, Universal Backup, Watcher. Those are all safe claims, because scum knows exacly what the setup is. One is not more suspicious than the other
Which leads me to
c) Have you reread chairs ? Because what you get from that is about five thousand times more important than him claiming VT, or your general impressions on the game so far. WHen someone flips scum, reset, look at the game as if you hadn't been in it since know you have crucial new information.
I'm not entirely sure who I want to lynch yet. I've figured out one person I don't want to, but I'm not sure beyond that. Going into the night, I though "well we lynch chairs tomorrow and we probably win, easy peasy" but I'm a little wary now, and it doesn't seem to me like the you (Andrew and DatSwan) are making sure this is what we want to do. I mean, chairs hasn't even posted yet.
Rereading is annoying, and I'm sure you're annoyed at me because I'm bossing people around (something I tend to do anyway but being an IC makes it worse). I'm sorry about that. But I think rereading everyone alive (well, everyone who could be scum at least, you can probably skip me) should be a prerequisite before voting at this point in the game.
No problem man. I mean I agree with the re reading idea. I did give everyone a glance. I actually went back and re read through some other late mafia games that ya'll have participated in on the forums. But, as we are in game time mode now, I will take the advice and give chairs another read. I don't think it is annoying, it is kind of the part that makes it fun
To elaborate on the first points:
1) Was reading XXR while typing out Andrew thing. I just mixed up. I understand the differences.
2) I would like to point out that they are not actually exactly the same in value of claim. I mean in a situation where skum actually knows literally 100% of which roles are on and off and who belongs to who (meaning 0% of false results, or never missing at night, and just everything) THENNNNN, yes it is the same. It was more of just to point out the differences between Andrew claim and his claim. Andrew claimed a PR and IMO gave sound reasoning I think is at least mostly accurate if not entirely. I do not think Galz is skum. I know you (IC) are not skum. and I know I am not skum. So I voted for chairs.
Answering your next post in this one too. As mentioned above, I will give chairs another re read. I am off the rest of the day so I will post later this evening on it.
unvote