I'm not a big fan of the fact that LaLight supports the idea that scum were the ones responsible for "derailing" the Reggie wagon, regardless of Reggie's alignment - but when asked specifically about the 4 (only FOUR!) people to have left the wagon he doesn't have strong reads on any of them.
It feels... fabricated.
Actually. Vote: LaLight. His responses just don't ring genuine to me.
I strongly disagree. You asked for something and he gave it. They felt perfectly genuine and plausible for the third day of Day 1.
It's a correlation in my mind. In a two scenario world (Reggie is scum or town), he said:
"If A, then X"
"If B, then X"
but when asked about X, there was no relationship to A or B. In fact, two of the four people that fall into the "X" category, he had townish reads on. And the other two were only slightly scum.
I guess in my mind, if in a two scenario world A and B both lead to X, then I'm intently focusing on X - since that's the constant. Having soft feelings on X feels weird to me, and leads me to feel like he made a statement (in this case that he believed scum tried to derail the wagon on Reggie, regardless of Reggie's alignment), without following the thought process through. Hell, when O first asked who it was that "bailed", he didn't even know exactly!
I don't really remember, there were sudgy and TWM and I think someone else
Maybe I'm crazy. You seem to disagree with me here, as does faust. PPS voted LaLight. O voted and then backed off. Eevee sheeped again - that's a little weird. Does town!Eevee sheep a lot these days? I don't know. I like LaLight better than J Reggie.