Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[faust]

Here, I made an easy-to-use template. Just copy-paste into your post!

[b]Vote: Roadrunner[/b]

[Awaclus]

That I've made, or at least joined, a good case against RR

How did RR respond to the case?

Not at all.

Then it was useless.

[Awaclus]

Here, I made an easy-to-use template. Just copy-paste into your post!

[b]Vote: Roadrunner[/b]

Yeah, you just have to replace Roadrunner with Skumpy and you're good to go.

[silverspawn]

It kind of is this close to the deadline.

Why?

Because it's not actual information about  whether someone is scum, so assuming town plays even somewhat well, they shouldn't do it.

[silverspawn]

I'm not in favor of lynching RR now. I've been right about him a couple of times before so I want to make the decision later, also he hasn't set off any alarm bells yet.

[faust]

It kind of is this close to the deadline.

Why?

Because it's not actual information about  whether someone is scum, so assuming town scum plays even somewhat well, they shouldn't do it.

It still holds this way.

[faust]

I'm not in favor of lynching RR now. I've been right about him a couple of times before so I want to make the decision later, also he hasn't set off any alarm bells yet.

You know, postponing a lynch without actually giving a read is much more scummy than that thing you pointed out about Jelly.

[LaLight]

Faust is kinda really extreme about every scumread this game don’t trmember him being this way before

[LaLight]

I am set on skumpy right now

[faust]

That whole Skumpy wagon is completely ridiculous. Scum is all over it.

Also, people should share their weak visitors.

[theorel]

But I know you'll want me to elaborate, so here:

I think the cons outweigh the pros. Your writeup earlier left out one con that is we're telling mafia which players will be on the lower deck.

It doesn't actually tell them very much in this regard...because if a player has been top-deck at all during the space phase they're eligible for kills.  And there's no way to know if those players go top-deck tomorrow night.  And scum can safely assume that the first 3 players made lower-deck since they have best opportunity to get there.

The main con that I see is that scum would know that these players are not cops or commuters tonight.  I'm not sure if that works out to make them more or less likely nk's though.

Um...WV: Awaclus.

[faust]

RR, iguana, Awaclus are all better lynches than the wagons we have right now. I mean, hell, luckat is a better lynch even.

[theorel]

Faust is kinda really extreme about every scumread this game don’t trmember him being this way before

He seems the same as he was in M111, where he was town and lynched town for no good reason.

That said, I think the RR vote is better than the iguana one...not sure how I feel about it relative the CJ lynch.
Skumpy wagon is terrible...I'll need to look back to see who's voting there.

[iguanaiguana]

Weak Visitor: Roadrunner

Vote: CJ

silver's right, that's a scummy vote.

Faust seems to have tunnel vision this game.

[Awaclus]

WV: silverspawn

[2.71828.....]

I would weak visit faust probably. But really, night actions are very dependant on the flip. I suppose weak visiting should be locked in though since, you know, you could die.

[Haddock]

Voting RR for RR things is probably a towntell for a new (?) player like Skumpy.
request vote count

[CheesyJelly]

It kind of is this close to the deadline.

Why?

Because it's not actual information about  whether someone is scum, so assuming town plays even somewhat well, they shouldn't do it.

I'm voting Skumpy because "I couldn't possibly be scum AGAIN" is nonsense and they know it.  That's not how probability works.  I also think all of Skumpy's posts since then have been scummy, including  the whole "Well I don't really want to play anyway..." thing.


[sarcasm] I apologise for daring to humour into my original short explanation. [/sarcasm]


I'll probably WV iguana.

[EFHW]

Voting RR for RR things is probably a towntell for a new (?) player like Skumpy.
request vote count

But you are voting for him.

[faust]

Weak Visitor: Roadrunner

Vote: CJ

silver's right, that's a scummy vote.

Faust seems to have tunnel vision this game.

If I had tunnel vision, I'd still be voting for you, wouldn't I?

[Haddock]

Voting RR for RR things is probably a towntell for a new (?) player like Skumpy.
request vote count

But you are voting for him.

Since before he did his "probable towntell".

I've already said I'll move my vote as necessary.

[faust]

Voting RR for RR things is probably a towntell for a new (?) player like Skumpy.
request vote count

But you are voting for him.

Since before he did his "probable towntell".

I've already said I'll move my vote as necessary.

It is necessary for you to move your vote to RR.

[faust]

Also, nice try at invalidating Skumpy's read.

[Haddock]

*sigh*

I'm not scumreading anyone here, but RR least of all.  He's just being RR.

I'll vote him to get a lynch through, if it comes to that.
Meanwhile not moving vote until I see a vote count.

[theorel]

Skumpy wagon is terrible...I'll need to look back to see who's voting there.

Let's see it's Haddock (from forever ago), Awaclus, Lalight, RR, and CJ.
That wagon picked up super-fast especially given Awaclus' non-reason for voting him.
LL comes off a bit scummy in the follow-up, but RR looks especially scummy in his vote.  CJ then follows again, but more because skumpy offers terrible reason for not being scum?  Nonetheless, while the statistical reasoning is unsound, it's not alignment indicative (IMO).

So, RR's vote is scummiest one there, CJ's vote is not great.  But, why are LL and RR even voting for him?  Blah, I could go to RR.  But CJ's not really coming off town either.  I dunno, conflicted.