Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[EFHW]

Weak Doctor: EFHW

everyone should do this now.

I will prepare some tea and marzipan! (aka space rations #73). I will reciprocate by visiting you should the opportunity arise.

PPE: Why are we saying WW instead of WV?

[EFHW]

Well, you know, let's build a case on RR, because as usual you will ignore my suspcions until I post some rambling post with a lot of quotes, after which everyone suddenly decides it's a good idea to sheep me. Sometimes I wish you could just assume that I made such a post whenever I vote for someone .... [/unquote]

Seriously?

[Skumpy]

It doesn't matter who I vote, they're gonna be town.

So you won't bus your partners?

You know firsthand that that's not true. I'm probably more likely to vote scum as Skum tbh.

The thing about LAlight is that he can always say some words that look towny in every game.  This is why he's rarely lynched. So you have to look at his votes. And I think his voting has been scummy this game more than other players. Could other people at least look at it?

That's not true at all... LaLight is super obvious as any alignment, and the only thing obfuscating this here is that he was drunk for a majority of his posts.

I've only played one game with the guy...but I think I agree with this. My make-or-break for LaLight comes from: he's played scum with me. Is he going to townread me hard, albeit drunk, and then switch later in the day because he thinks there's a wagon that could be built on me? Gonna say that's something more likely from town than scum. For now.

Weak Visitor: faust
Surprise....
Btw: Try to pick as many different people for the WV as possible

[silverspawn]

that's right visitor starts with a v!

[faust]

I would agree with the case on RR if it was anyone else who did this stuff

Weak Doctor: EFHW

everyone should do this now.

Uh, what? Do you want us to WW her or do you want to force her to WW someone?

I'm saying that if I use Weak Visitor, it will be on EFHW.

[Skumpy]

Well, you know, let's build a case on RR, because as usual you will ignore my suspcions until I post some rambling post with a lot of quotes, after which everyone suddenly decides it's a good idea to sheep me. Sometimes I wish you could just assume that I made such a post whenever I vote for someone...

I don't really like CJ or e at the moment. Let me find an alternative.

"I think it will look rather scummy for me to join the main wagons at this stage."

Lalight, Haddock and gkreig seem to be my three favorite choices, in that order.

"Let's list a bunch of people that have been under suspicion already and see where that goes."

I don't really like CJ or e at the moment. Let me find an alternative.

iguana is an alternative.

Not really for me, I have a trusting nature towards that reptile.

"Here's an argument for my stance that does not require me to express any opinion about this game."

At L-1 should you claim the cards you have?

"Oh, someone voted me. Let#s distract everyone with a completely pointless theory discussion."

I haven't said anything about faust yet this game. Maybe now's a good time to start. I wanted to keep my cards close the vest, but since I need to check my ego at the spacedoor and since there's a good chance I'm getting lynched....

Initial feeling about faust was town. But I have an impulse that I will always misread faust, town as scum and vice versa. So now I want to say he's scum and I really wanted to lynch him, or else try to track a potential busser/bussee (like CJ).

But despite that I disagree with the notion that faust is a sheepworthy player...

...yep, that's the scum RR I remember. He's so darn lurky and cautious and softspoken (see 105), and there's just a natural confidence and swagger to him as town that's not present here (see 108, which was not a game I was in, but one I would sometimes flip through).

(But I'm still coming for you faust; don't think you've hoodwinked me completely)

On the other hand, Awaclus never votes correctly.

That's a lie. Vote: Skumpy

I'm quoting this because it's just as funny as it was 12 hours ago, and we all need to laugh sometimes in life.

Vote: RR

[faust]

Weak Visitor: faust
Surprise....
Btw: Try to pick as many different people for the WV as possible

... he says while picking the same target as EFHW

[Skumpy]

Weak Visitor: faust
Surprise....
Btw: Try to pick as many different people for the WV as possible

... he says while picking the same target as EFHW

Probably should've PPE'd that.

[Skumpy]

Weak Visitor: faust
Surprise....
Btw: Try to pick as many different people for the WV as possible

... he says while picking the same target as EFHW

Probably should've PPE'd that.

You know what fine:
WV: e

[Skumpy]

Gonna revisit setup one last time:

Okay, my previous post on good night actions was too stream of consciousness, and I had a rule wrong.  So, let's try again:
Players 1, 2, and 3 should do the following in order (if you can):
1: Red-Lift-B
2: Blue-Lift-B
3: Lift-B-A

Still agreeing with this. Theorel has said he will wiggle the mouse tonight, so if Theorel is 1-3, then people 2-4 behind him should try and do the play one step ahead. Nobody else wiggle the mouse. Rest of quoted post has suggested actions, good idea for everybody else (though remember that you only get 1 successful action/phase)

Issues:
1) A risk people may not have all the cards, but it's a risk that's sufficiently low IMO.
2) Does tell scum some people who won't have powers that need blocking/silencing/flipping.

Perks:
1) Gets 3 people safely below decks, give some info about what everyone else should be trying to do to follow suit.
2) Prevents multidoing of the Mouse/Pool filling (though a 2nd replenish of the central pool would be nice at some opint)
3) Gets the pools filled and the mouse wiggled (duh), and limits doubling up of A/B actions.
4) Discourages scum from moving up the order because they have a set set of instructions that we will know if they don't obey.
5) And holds people accountable. People unable to do one specific assignment based on their cards is unlikely. So they have to do it. Scum could try to give it to another scum later in the order, but there's a risk of them getting caught.

If I'm lynched, my dying wish will be for you all to follow the plan.

Deadline: I don't know how involved I can be in terms of posting, but I'll be around to vote, though I don't really wanna move.

[Awaclus]

What's scummy about Skumpy's posts? Need to look at e and CJ.

What isn't scummy about Skumpy's posts?

[faust]

I won't feel bound to any fixed set of moves no matter my position in player order.

[Skumpy]

I won't feel bound to any fixed set of moves no matter my position in player order.

Then I sincerely hope you're not in the top 3 and your family messages from home are intercepted. Do you wanna elaborate or no?

What's scummy about Skumpy's posts? Need to look at e and CJ.

What isn't scummy about Skumpy's posts?

That I've made, or at least joined, a good case against RR, and it's a better place for your vote, unless there happens to be something less scummy about RR and his metas than me for...something? Doesn't matter if you find me scummy, vote for the scummiest. Or that I've both tried to build cases against people, possibly self-admittedly farfetched at times, and tried to contribute to set-up discussion and planning, possibly self-admittedly despite confusion over mechanics and over optimal strats. But if I'm Skum, I've taken a huge risk by throwing out a whole bunch of jargon that could be scumread rather than say nothing. Another good point in my favor: you're voting for me!

Let's play a mini-Spacegame: Who Said Thaaaaaat Mafia "Quote"?!

For today's spacEpisode, we have:

is Awaclus always this horrible? Every game I've seen him in his reads have been atrocious...and [he] assumes at all times that he is correct, when I've yet to see even a single case of that being true.

[faust]

I won't feel bound to any fixed set of moves no matter my position in player order.

Then I sincerely hope you're not in the top 3 and your family messages from home are intercepted. Do you wanna elaborate or no?

All my concerns have already been expressed, so no, not really.

[faust]

But I know you'll want me to elaborate, so here:

I think the cons outweigh the pros. Your writeup earlier left out one con that is we're telling mafia which players will be on the lower deck.

[faust]

Once more, Request prod on luckat

Request replacement for luckat

[Awaclus]

That I've made, or at least joined, a good case against RR

How did RR respond to the case?

[Skumpy]

OK, time for another mini-Spacegame: Scout out the RoadRunner Scum!

Here are 5 quotes from this game from RR, randomly chosen via RNG:

I've been lurking hardcore, later tonight I'll come on and actually contribute a little.

Think iguana is town here.

If you’re scum i’m ready to unvote.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I don't really like CJ or e at the moment. Let me find an alternative.

At L-1 should you claim the cards you have?

At L-1 should you claim the cards you have?

I can't see why that's useful?

Can you see why it's un-useful?

Now, we have 10 more quotes, also randomly picked. 5 come from M105 (Scum) and come from M108 (Town) They have been scrambled and edited so as to try and conceal clues (when possible). Can you tell which come from Scum!RR and which come from town!RR

1.

[], how many times have you been mislynched in your mafia career ?

Absolutely love this argument.

Also I think [] should claim his target sooner rather than not sooner.

2.

We should follow the claim order and not have all this nonsense going on.

3.

Agree with []’s analysis

Which part ? Because it's not entirely clear to me what conclusion [] has arrived to.

The part about how [] isn't a good lynch today but becomes a better lynch the longer he's alive.

4.

What a joke.

Think i am kinda done with this game.

?

5.

put in effort

I haven't been doing too much of that and i'm almost done rereading him  not too much to go off of.

6.

Not sure where my vote is, but I want on on Datswan. Vote: Datswan

7.

I haven't claimed anything yet. That was DatSwan you're thinking of.

Oh, right. You've just been scum read for some reason or another by most people at some point in time.

8.

I'm gonna go reassess [...] and [...] to try and get a better grasp on them.

I'm not saying you shouldn't do that, but you are aware that they are both dead, right ?

Why are they dead? Who helped kill them the most? Who wanted them dead? Those are the things that would be cool to know.

9.

vote: RR

The reasoning behind this vote is pretty convincing 

10.

RoadRunner (35 posts): Seems to be flaily town for D1.

I'm not flailing!

Answers: Town RR is the Triangle Numbers . And 2. Now take away what you will.
(I worked really hard on this for no reason at all. OK, I'm done making non-voting posts for D1. Hopefully catch you all tomorrow).

[SpaceAnemone]

Luckat was prodded, and is currently considered missing in action. These missions can be perilous.

Further status reports on your missing colleague will be forthcoming as the ship's automated systems gather more information...

[CheesyJelly]

I mean, it's a mathematic impossibility of me getting scum thrice in a row.

Vote: Skumpy

Statistics abuse is the main tool of the Science Denier.

[silverspawn]

vote: CJ

Ok let's lynch them. Using a joke for a serious vote is scumscum.

[faust]

vote: CJ

Ok let's lynch them. Using a joke for a serious vote is scumscum.

It isn't really.

[silverspawn]

It kind of is this close to the deadline.

[faust]

It kind of is this close to the deadline.

Why?

[faust]

That I've made, or at least joined, a good case against RR

How did RR respond to the case?

Not at all.