Well, yeah, that's what I'd call "on principle", because you don't seem to be putting much weight into how badly this can go.
I'll take a very simple example, I have no idea how it relates to the current situation, but there :
- faust claims Tracker, has seen WW targeting silverspawn. Incriminating, but not definitive
- WW claims, idk, Roleblocker or something. Something that's hard to prove.
What do we do know ? Both claims are believable, but there is still doubt because WW got to make his claim knowing who he was supposed to have targeted. So maybe we lynch WW anyway and either he flips scum (yay) or he flips town, and then what ? Or maybe we don't lynch any of them, but we can't completely trust their claim either, especially WWs in this case.
Now if we do a simultaneous claim, there's still the situation where we out two PRs for very little benefit, but at least there won't be as much doubt hanging over WWs claim because he madeit withoutknowledge of what he was being accused of. So we presumably get almost-ICs out of it if their claims support each other.