Topic: M66: Paris Mafia (Game Over, Town Wins) (Read 133965 times)

Witherweaver · « **Reply #250 on:** August 21, 2015, 02:31:18 pm »

Quote from: UmbrageOfSnow on August 21, 2015, 02:26:17 pm

Quote from: Seprix on August 21, 2015, 02:03:00 pm
Uh... What's going on...? A lot of 'q' and redacts and upset individuals. Man oh man. OH I GET IT NOW! PARIS MAFIA! You're all jealous Goddesses fighting over who is the best of all! Question is, who is Paris? Who is Helen?

Paris Mafia II: Troy Harder
Coming soon to a forum near you

So many +1s for you

Teproc · « **Reply #251 on:** August 21, 2015, 02:31:33 pm »

Quote from: silverspawn on August 21, 2015, 02:26:44 pm

Awaclus has a meta of not explaining votes. That doesn't really make him scummy.

It does make him anti-town though.

silver, what do you think of QS ?

Sidenote : In Paris Mafia, wouldn't Eris be the scum ? Maybe SK ?

Witherweaver · « **Reply #252 on:** August 21, 2015, 02:32:32 pm »

Quote from: silverspawn on August 21, 2015, 02:26:44 pm

Awaclus has a meta of not explaining votes. That doesn't really make him scummy.

It sure makes him lynchable though. Admit it, you know it would feel good.

QuickSync · « **Reply #253 on:** August 21, 2015, 02:33:09 pm »

Quote from: silverspawn on August 21, 2015, 02:26:44 pm

Awaclus has a meta of not explaining votes. That doesn't really make him scummy.

You read incorrectly. That is not why I am voting for him.

silverspawn · « **Reply #254 on:** August 21, 2015, 02:48:11 pm »

Quote from: Teproc on August 21, 2015, 02:31:33 pm

Quote from: silverspawn on August 21, 2015, 02:26:44 pm
Awaclus has a meta of not explaining votes. That doesn't really make him scummy.

It does make him anti-town though.

silver, what do you think of QS ?

I'm getting scum vibes but I feel like they may be unjustified and just based on him coming off site. Still, if I had to lynch someone right now, It'd be him.

Quote from: QuickSync on August 21, 2015, 02:33:09 pm

You read incorrectly. That is not why I am voting for him.

I meant WW

sudgy · « **Reply #255 on:** August 21, 2015, 03:24:05 pm »

While it could be completely wrong, I feel like QS is acting more like frustrated scum than frustrated town, so Vote: QuickSync (again).

Witherweaver · « **Reply #256 on:** August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm »

Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

Witherweaver · « **Reply #257 on:** August 21, 2015, 03:32:28 pm »

He's starting to sound townier to me.

Awaclus · « **Reply #258 on:** August 21, 2015, 03:38:37 pm »

Quote from: QuickSync on August 21, 2015, 02:13:16 pm

Not explaining votes is seriously a bad way to play. Its way too easy for scum to just vote without reason if no one explains why they are voting the way they are.

It is trivial to come up with a fake reason for voting the way you are. It is not at all easier to just vote without reason.

sudgy · « **Reply #259 on:** August 21, 2015, 03:56:51 pm »

Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm

Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

He has several votes.

Seprix · « **Reply #260 on:** August 21, 2015, 05:01:34 pm »

Quote from: sudgy on August 21, 2015, 03:56:51 pm

Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm
Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

He has several votes.

Plausible, but scum would shut up and let the game go on...

unvote

I think XP or Faust today, leaning Faust so far.

sudgy · « **Reply #261 on:** August 21, 2015, 05:11:28 pm »

Quote from: Seprix on August 21, 2015, 05:01:34 pm

Quote from: sudgy on August 21, 2015, 03:56:51 pm
Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm
Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

He has several votes.

Plausible, but scum would shut up and let the game go on...

Not all scum. Different people play a lot differently, and some people as scum get mad in a situation like this. Town does too, but as I said, I think it looked more like frustrated scum, not frustrated town.

QuickSync · « **Reply #262 on:** August 21, 2015, 05:29:15 pm »

Quote from: sudgy on August 21, 2015, 05:11:28 pm

Quote from: Seprix on August 21, 2015, 05:01:34 pm
Quote from: sudgy on August 21, 2015, 03:56:51 pm
Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm
Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

He has several votes.

Plausible, but scum would shut up and let the game go on...

Not all scum. Different people play a lot differently, and some people as scum get mad in a situation like this. Town does too, but as I said, I think it looked more like frustrated scum, not frustrated town.

Why?

Seprix · « **Reply #263 on:** August 21, 2015, 05:44:12 pm »

I do have to ask why as well.

Witherweaver · « **Reply #264 on:** August 21, 2015, 05:49:20 pm »

Quote from: Awaclus on August 21, 2015, 03:38:37 pm

Quote from: QuickSync on August 21, 2015, 02:13:16 pm
Not explaining votes is seriously a bad way to play. Its way too easy for scum to just vote without reason if no one explains why they are voting the way they are.

It is trivial to come up with a fake reason for voting the way you are. It is not at all easier to just vote without reason.

It is trivially easier, like by definition.

Witherweaver · « **Reply #265 on:** August 21, 2015, 05:52:17 pm »

Quote from: sudgy on August 21, 2015, 03:56:51 pm

Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm
Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

He has several votes.

But it's not a small game and it's been not even two days since the day started. Early wagons don't often lead to much.

Teproc · « **Reply #266 on:** August 21, 2015, 06:05:58 pm »

Quote from: Awaclus on August 21, 2015, 03:38:37 pm

Quote from: QuickSync on August 21, 2015, 02:13:16 pm
Not explaining votes is seriously a bad way to play. Its way too easy for scum to just vote without reason if no one explains why they are voting the way they are.

It is trivial to come up with a fake reason for voting the way you are. It is not at all easier to just vote without reason.

It is not trivial to come up with fake reasons for voting and feel sincere however. The more scum talks, the more likely there are to slip (not in the scumslip sense, you know what I mean), up until a certain point. Therefore, voting without explanation is anti town since it allows scum to get away with it.

That being said, unexpalined votes have value too.... as long as they're explained eventually.

Teproc · « **Reply #267 on:** August 21, 2015, 06:07:13 pm »

Awaclus : I know you think your town meta is to not make cases or whatever, but in that case it means your town met ais being useless. Please don't be useless for the sake of conforming to your town meta, as you know it won't prevent you from being lynched.

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #268 on:** August 21, 2015, 06:10:44 pm »

Well metas from different sites are definitely different. Qs reads scummy to me right now but it could just be an over reaction to votes. Seprix is seeming towny, which never happens at the beginning of a game for me. So maybe he's mime? Silver also seems towny to me this game. I'll reread more later.

QuickSync · « **Reply #269 on:** August 21, 2015, 06:23:18 pm »

Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 05:52:17 pm

Quote from: sudgy on August 21, 2015, 03:56:51 pm
Quote from: Witherweaver on August 21, 2015, 03:32:05 pm
Why would scum!QS be frustrated right now?

He has several votes.

But it's not a small game and it's been not even two days since the day started. Early wagons don't often lead to much.

Based on the way this game is going, I could very well see myself getting lynched.

silverspawn · « **Reply #270 on:** August 21, 2015, 06:58:55 pm »

Quote from: gkrieg13 on August 21, 2015, 06:10:44 pm

silver also seems towny to me this game. I'll reread more later.

this is good. at least a third of your reads is already correct.

Awaclus · « **Reply #271 on:** August 21, 2015, 07:28:08 pm »

Quote from: Teproc on August 21, 2015, 06:05:58 pm

It is not trivial to come up with fake reasons for voting and feel sincere however.

How it's not trivial? Just think of a reason why town would vote that way, then make sure it's not inconsistent with your previous actions, and that's it.

Teproc · « **Reply #272 on:** August 21, 2015, 07:33:01 pm »

Quote from: Awaclus on August 21, 2015, 07:28:08 pm

Quote from: Teproc on August 21, 2015, 06:05:58 pm
It is not trivial to come up with fake reasons for voting and feel sincere however.

How it's not trivial? Just think of a reason why town would vote that way, then make sure it's not inconsistent with your previous actions, and that's it.

Ok... if it is trivial, how is it you think we catch scum ?

QuickSync · « **Reply #273 on:** August 21, 2015, 07:34:35 pm »

Quote from: Awaclus on August 21, 2015, 07:28:08 pm

Quote from: Teproc on August 21, 2015, 06:05:58 pm
It is not trivial to come up with fake reasons for voting and feel sincere however.

How it's not trivial? Just think of a reason why town would vote that way, then make sure it's not inconsistent with your previous actions, and that's it.

I think the point they are trying to make is that its way harder to come up with legit reasons for a vote as scum as opposed to Town. Take Scott Howard Rule Of Odd Posts for example.

Teproc · « **Reply #274 on:** August 21, 2015, 07:35:42 pm »

Quote from: QuickSync on August 21, 2015, 07:34:35 pm

Quote from: Awaclus on August 21, 2015, 07:28:08 pm
Quote from: Teproc on August 21, 2015, 06:05:58 pm
It is not trivial to come up with fake reasons for voting and feel sincere however.

How it's not trivial? Just think of a reason why town would vote that way, then make sure it's not inconsistent with your previous actions, and that's it.

I think the point they are trying to make is that its way harder to come up with legit reasons for a vote as scum as opposed to Town. Take Scott Howard Rule Of Odd Posts for example.

You can safely assume that no one here knows what that is (well, maybe silverspawn ?). So, what is it ?

Dominion Strategy Forum

News:

Author Topic: M66: Paris Mafia (Game Over, Town Wins) (Read 133965 times)