You're also not on Seprix currently -- are you still scummy on him? What's your viewpoint here? Apologies if it's been stated recently, but it's just impossible to remember the current thoughts of 17 people.
largely forgot about him before your post, light scum based on your reread.
let's see though
- Seprix doesn't respond to #84, even though he clearly read the post (re: views on UoS). FoS to Seprix for this.
I think this is generally a good argument, because not responding to posts is something scum can often get away with, especially if other stuff is happening - and even if they get called out on it, it's not that big of a deal, because town can forget stuff too.
that said 84 was this
I know the roles in mafia. It was just the flavor name. I think it is just in a different language and/or I don't have a large enough vocabulary
Great, so now you're either PR or Mafia claiming subtly. I'll err on the side of PR since you're new.
unvote
Be a man and actually keep your vote on him. This seems like a book with manly men who can vote for something and not immediately remove it before it's even had a chance to give the slightest feeling of pressure.
which doesn't necessarily call for an answer.
#138 Seprix post -- Fishy to me. "Chairs!scum is something I can see easily" -- the way it's worded has me weirded out. It's like he wants to support the narrative (and thus lynch him), but he says it in a way that he can easily flip to 'oh yeah, it can be a scum narrative, too'
well - it's {alignment}!{playername}, not vice versa... but that's the only thing I find weird about that post.
{{ doing a short reread myself }}
eh. nullish. he has this
really weird post on faust which I'd give him mild town points for because what? Aside from that, he doesn't seem too terribly invested, which I think might be a town trait? but he's also blending in, so slight scum for that.