I don't really get your logic. As you have just described, he went really fast from someone makes a vote to L-2 and even L-1, in the spawn of like a couple of hours, in a game where we need 7 for a lynch. I don't know about you, but in my experience that's very fast. So, basically, it's exactly like I was saying.
The first four votes all together was odd, and definitely notable. The rest of it was at a normal to slow pace, all things considered, and it died out before a lynch could happen.
So no, it was not "too easy" given it didn't succeed.
yes, because I prevented it from happening. You can't argue that it wasn't an "easy lynch" because it didn't work when the whole reason why it didn't work is because I thought it was too easy and stopped. That's like if I attempt to jump off a bridge but draw back in the last minute and you say, "hey, trying to jump off that bridge isn't actually dangerous, because you aren't going to do it anyway.
You could argue that "stalling" is too strong a word, but for the person who actually HELPED the stall (by unvoting when the lynch was actually possible) to be complaining about it is laughable.
I haven't been "complaining" about anything. All I did was saying let's try something else, and voted for ADK.
Now, I could have pushed the Hydrad lynch and if I did, he might be lynched now, and he might be scum. But I decided not to, because a) I never had that strong of a read on him, I mostly supported it to make stuff happen, and b) I think we can achieve more today. If ADK doesn't take off, we can still go back and lynch Hydrad, and we'll have a better position tomorrow than we'd have if we just lynched him. Now, if we try to go back to Hydrad and it doesn't work again, then you can argue that the lynch is hard.
tl;dr I don't think you're making too much sense atm, I feel like you're trying to get a reaction from me. That's something you do, isn't it?