Alright.
I'm a Town Protector
During the day, I can type protect : CalignoBot (or whomever) and that player becomes loved, meaning you'd need one more vote to lynch them. It's like a vote, in that I can change it whenever I want, I can even not protect at all. I can do it on myself, but if I do I lose my power at the start of the next day.
Thoughts ?
I am inclined to townread this. At minimum, I'm not going to support a wagon on this slot on day 1 without a significant amount of evidence for him being anti-town. There's not a whole lot of reason for scum to openly state this when they could just keep that claim in the background and sneak that in when one of their 'town reads' gets close to being lynched.
Plus it brings attention to him early on and makes him a big focus in the early game. There's a lot more to lose than gain as scum by doing this.
Alright.
I'm a Town Protector
During the day, I can type protect : CalignoBot (or whomever) and that player becomes loved, meaning you'd need one more vote to lynch them. It's like a vote, in that I can change it whenever I want, I can even not protect at all. I can do it on myself, but if I do I lose my power at the start of the next day.
Thoughts ?
Can you use it at LyLo? Sounds pretty OP if you can.
Not really. Well it's good if I have perfect reads, but that's pretty conditional. I also need to be alive by then, which is not super likely either.
So you can? I would think that targeting yourself is pretty good since it gives the other townies a good chance to hit scum that day (well, unless Pit is right). And especially if you're actually scum, it's pretty OP at LyLo.
On the other hand, I don't like this post. The logic doesn't make very much sense and this type of thinking doesn't look town-motivated in the first place. Telling someone to use an ability on themselves that makes them harder to kill and then focusing on the scum side in the last line feels like it was a calculated response.
---
Teproc's indication of how the role works makes me think even more that it was town-motivated to claim. Something that's misleading as that would be better to keep hidden and try to pass off as a governor role later if he had to use it as scum.
Also, were other town players also given a personal QT? Does anyone know if those are for anything special? Mine doesn't seem to have a specific purpose.
This post is pinging me slightly, mainly the way he stated town players. Reads like a subtle attempt to influence reads on him before he goes into the spotlight.
Archetype (#39): We got the same indication with opposite results. Can you go into more detail for me here please?
Teproc (#40): What's your experience with mafia up to this point?
Archetype (#49): Scratch the last question. Leaning town on this explanation.
I'm leaning slight town on LittleB up to about mid-page 3.
Jimmmmm's post calling out Hydrad and then completely switching gears to ask a passive question a few posts later pings. His posts at the top of page 4 are decaying my read further.
Yeah, littleB is town. The explanation for the Awaclus vote is dripping newtown.