So one post of TA sheeping other people's arguments and it took two people to find THAT one example. Cool. I'm glad everyone is able to slowly see how those TA townreads that were being tossed out like candy were completely unsupported.
TA had 16 in-game posts before he quit.
If he had played the entire game, assuming he survived for a few days at least, he would have had hundreds. You've not played here before, and you've not played a game with TA, but when he's town, he is a very valuable player who's insightful and smart.
He's not the greatest scum player in the world, actually (no offense TA).
The town reads some players here were "toss[ing] out like candy" were unsupported by his content. I don't know that anyone would argue against that statement. But some people start with auto-townreads, and that is based on prior experience, which you don't have here.
My point is, it's okay that people had TA as a townread without having any content to support it. It's just a read.
Just like it's okay for you to have a scumread on TA without having any content to support it.
Lack of positive proof does not prove a negative. Imagine this statement: "using black keyboards causes lung cancer." I cannot definitively prove that black keyboards do NOT cause lung cancer, as that's an impossible task. Just because I can't prove that doesn't make the statement true.