And another thing that makes me a bit uneasy is that I think if Eddie flips as Town, then we don't get an awful lot of information from the wagon - he feels like an 'easy' person to justify voting for.
Eg hypercube went for an argument along the lines of 'not very useful to town'. (And I was including a bit of that in my reasoning too.)
But an 'easy' wagon is both:
easy for scum to join without so much suspicion.
easy for the wagon to reach a lynch without scum lifting a finger.
Would you agree, hypercube?
Then why not unvote? You seem to be very unsettled.
I did consider unvoting, but there seemed to be plenty of good reasons to keep my vote there. Here are the ones that I feel able to share at the moment:
1. My main reason for voting Eddie in the first place was for his scumminess.
2. I think I have more reasons for thinking Eddie is scum than the ones I put in the post where I voted for him.
3. Even though Eddie flipping as town might not be hugely informative, if he flips as scum, that would be hugely informative (as well as just generally good).
4. L-1 probably provokes better reactions from other players.
5. My reads of people are highly likely to change, including the scummy ones that were on the Eddie wagon.
6. I definitely prefer an Eddie lynch to a no-lynch, and it seems like 6 out of 10 players agreeing on a day 1 lynch might be tricky (I don't really know, though, this being my first game).
7. I think I am naturally over-cautious, so should make a determined effort sometimes to throw caution to the wind, otherwise I'd never get anywhere.