Well, I don't really have a scum read on Sudgy. I see what people are saying, but I think it's more likely a case of someone not playing very carefully. If he was scum he'd probably be much more conscious about what he's posting. Or else he's just going for crazy randomness.
My opinion on Andrewis hasn't changed. I don't think there's any more to be said about it, though. It would just be rehashing what has been said before, and I can't see me suddenly seeing it in a new light. I would really like to know his alignment, though.
I think out of all the options other than Andrewis, Ash comes off as the most scummy. It makes more sense to me for super aggression to come from scum rather than town. To me it would get a mislynch more likely as some of the town can get convinced by the argument, scum can hop on the wagon without much suspicion, and people that are on the fence can look to flaws in the other person's defense. In fact, that could have indeed been what happened here. If Andrewis was town, he got put in an uncomfortable spot pretty quickly, and most of the people that voted against him (including me) did so because of issues with how he defended himself, not because of the original accusation. And then when the mislynch happens, you have the wine-in-front-of-me defense "Why would I have been so aggressive about it if I was scum? Scum is more likely to come in later and dodge suspicion." And people would probably buy that, because it would take a lot of guts.
Well, I'm back to being uncertain about the Andrewis/Ash thing. I have trouble reconciling scum reads on both of them. Maybe it's an act to confuse us, but Ash was pushing it pretty hard, and that seems like a really risky idea. Though maybe the goal could have been to get town on the wagon and then cast them as scum that were trying to sneak on the mislynch without raising much attention.
I suppose there is a chance they're both scum, but not on the same team. One could be a third party (serial killer or whatever).
So my choices are Andrewis or Ash. I guess I'd be okay with either.. I'm going to Vote: Ashersky.