Ok, yuma, I misread you. When you referred to early Day 1, I thought you were going back to the old case. I was not aware until just now that you had repudiated that case. So far as I knew, you were still using it.
I understand how not having townreads looks scummy - I'm the one who brought it up! I didn't even realize that was the case with me until you said it. Do you think if I was scum and using that strategy that I would purposely call attention to it? btw, you had 4 lukewarm townreads in a 13 player game. This is a 9 player game. And if I was trying to tunnel you, I would have just left those out. The point of that quote was that you endorsed a "quick to suspicion" play style, which is what you were criticizing me for doing.
My first vote on Eevee was very early, when people make votes for little or subtle things. When you defended him AND came out with that business about Theorel AND voted me, it seemed like you were trying to 1. distract away from Eevee and 2. discredit me. The flimsiness of your argument really reinforced that impression. When I voted Eevee again, and once again you voted me immediately, that looks like a pattern. That's just where your best efforts led you, even though it looks scummy? Well the same thing for my not having townreads.
The vigor of your defense was in 1) it's immediacy, and 2) the vigor of your attack on me - and Day 1 based on supposition only.
You bring up faust as an example, but he was a mislynch, motivated in large part by you.
I guess I'm back to about 50% on you being scum, having been higher earlier today. You won't be lynched today, so I'm going back to vote: Eevee.