Yo I'll sheep that.
vote: EFHW
I just did a quick reread of EFHW and there's much less actual content there than I thought. There's quite a few posts, but they're mostly all brief, asking questions, discussing perfunctory matters and vaguely fomenting suspicions. It's all very pleasant, but so non-committal. yuma's most recent post rings true to me, and I find yuma to be quite towny right now.
And then just now EFHW finds me "scummy-ish"[1] for my comments on mail-mi? What, my one comment on mail-mi, like, 3 pages ago? Why bring that up now? and I still do find mail-mi to be rather scummy actually. His posts are sparse and mostly insubstantial by my estimation. The most substantial thing he's written is that one-liner reads post, right after I called him out actually...very well-timed. Maybe I'm just not familiar with his usual playstyle...but I do know that right now I'm finding it to be fluffy. And we do not abide fluff in Westeros.
In fact I was considering voting for mail-mi just now. Anyone else feeling that? But I thought I'd go for EFHW instead, to use my vote to exert some more real pressure.
Possible EFHW/mail-mi scumteam? Note how EFHW stuck up for mail-mi in her accusation of me seemingly out of the blue, and mail-mi also recently quoted EFHW and said "Something to keep note of, for sure." On my reread, I also noticed that some of the first dialogue of the game was a ""pleasantry"" and ""RVS vote"" exchanged between the two of them. I don't know if they'd be so overt about it though. A tenuous connection perhaps, and possibly magnified by OMGUS, but it's an observation.
And yes Robz, it looks like your wagon has disintegrated somewhat. For now. Maybe you are right, but I did think that the way you expressed yourself came across as off-putting, and I do remain wary.
[1]Slightly weird that she would specifically define the term scummy-ish here, even after having just used it 2 posts earlier? Barely worth mentioning, which is why this is a footnote lol.