Topic: Vanilla Resistance. (Read 60765 times)

shraeye · « **Reply #150 on:** May 06, 2013, 07:08:21 pm »

Mission 1 votes: 2 passes

Mission 1 passes

Jimmmm is now the team leader, he has 24 hours from this post to choose a team of 3 players for Mission 2

liopoil · « **Reply #151 on:** May 06, 2013, 07:10:52 pm »

Woooooo! 2 to go. we gotta pick three now right? I see no reason not to pick Jimmmmm and myself again. sure submitting a pass as spy is a perfectly valid strategy, but I maintain that it must count for something because sabotaging is also a perfectly valid strategy, and neither of us did that.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #152 on:** May 06, 2013, 07:14:38 pm »

Quote from: liopoil on May 06, 2013, 07:10:52 pm

Woooooo! 2 to go. we gotta pick three now right? I see no reason not to pick Jimmmmm and myself again. sure submitting a pass as spy is a perfectly valid strategy, but I maintain that it must count for something because sabotaging is also a perfectly valid strategy, and neither of us did that.

I agree with this. You're certainly not cleared, but taking the same people who passed a mission seems like a really good starting point.

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #153 on:** May 06, 2013, 07:33:09 pm »

Woohoo!

I agree, both of you two have a little bit more resistance cred than the rest of us, so you should probably go on it. As for the third, I'd like it to be myself of course, but I'm willing to listen to any other ideas as to who it should be, as well.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #154 on:** May 06, 2013, 07:35:52 pm »

Quote from: Twistedarcher on May 06, 2013, 01:03:52 pm

Munch, why did you accept this one?

Very interested to hear the answer to this.

TheMunch · « **Reply #155 on:** May 06, 2013, 07:42:23 pm »

Quote from: Jimmmmm on May 06, 2013, 07:35:52 pm

Quote from: Twistedarcher on May 06, 2013, 01:03:52 pm
Munch, why did you accept this one?

Very interested to hear the answer to this.

It didn't contain MM.

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #156 on:** May 06, 2013, 08:10:10 pm »

If I were you though I would have declined straight down the line to y own mission...which you didn't. Not sure if you have more information than the rest of us do or not, but regardless I don't think I want you on this mission.

Preferred mission for me is jimm, liopiol, and myself. If I'm not on it is probably want to see archetype. I'd guess that one of lio/ Jim is a spy, though, so idk...no idea as to who of the two is more likely.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #157 on:** May 06, 2013, 08:17:00 pm »

Quote from: Twistedarcher on May 06, 2013, 08:10:10 pm

Preferred mission for me is jimm, liopiol, and myself. If I'm not on it is probably want to see archetype. I'd guess that one of lio/ Jim is a spy, though, so idk...no idea as to who of the two is more likely.

Come again?

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #158 on:** May 06, 2013, 08:17:18 pm »

lio, what do you think of Munch?

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #159 on:** May 06, 2013, 08:34:49 pm »

Quote from: Jimmmmm on May 06, 2013, 08:17:00 pm

Quote from: Twistedarcher on May 06, 2013, 08:10:10 pm
Preferred mission for me is jimm, liopiol, and myself. If I'm not on it is probably want to see archetype. I'd guess that one of lio/ Jim is a spy, though, so idk...no idea as to who of the two is more likely.

Come again?

Sorry two separate thoughts. Right now because you two passed I trust you the most. So I want to see you two and myself.

But then again I wouldn't bet on one of you two not being a spy. Somehow a spy ALWAYS ends up on the first mission.

TheMunch · « **Reply #160 on:** May 06, 2013, 09:31:56 pm »

Quote from: Twistedarcher on May 06, 2013, 08:10:10 pm

If I were you though I would have declined straight down the line to y own mission...which you didn't. Not sure if you have more information than the rest of us do or not, but regardless I don't think I want you on this mission.

Preferred mission for me is jimm, liopiol, and myself. If I'm not on it is probably want to see archetype. I'd guess that one of lio/ Jim is a spy, though, so idk...no idea as to who of the two is more likely.

I'm confused. I stated my intentions that I was pretty comfortable with a not MM mission so I dont know why it came as a surprise. But even with that said, you are upset... because I passed a mission that was not sabotaged. I appreciate the argument of "I know I'm resistance so I'm the best bet to put on a mission" argument but at a certain point I start getting suspicious that you have an ulterior motive for wanting to be on the mission. If you are resistance you are being overeager. If you are a spy, I know there are arguments in favor of sabotaging (to try to frame the other guy) or not sabotaging (to gain resistance cred and not give away to the other guy you are a spy) but this overeagerness can also be explained by you being a spy, deciding that one of these options with being on the first mission is a really strong strategy and you REALLY wanted to get on that mission. I just cant see why you are upset that a mission succeed.

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #161 on:** May 06, 2013, 09:57:37 pm »

I am not upset, just trying to interpret your motivations in accepting a mission you weren't on.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #162 on:** May 07, 2013, 10:55:41 am »

Well, seeing as nobody's talking, I'm going to go ahead and Propose: Jimmmmm, liopoil, TheMunch.

shraeye · « **Reply #163 on:** May 07, 2013, 11:41:55 am »

Proposal has been made, please PM me within 12 hours with reject or accept for the mission team Jimmmm, liopoil, TheMunch

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #164 on:** May 07, 2013, 12:16:15 pm »

There is almost certainly a spy on this mission...so I will be rejecting.

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #165 on:** May 07, 2013, 12:16:32 pm »

Why Munch as the third member, Jim?

liopoil · « **Reply #166 on:** May 07, 2013, 03:43:46 pm »

hmmmmm... sorry, I should have commented earlier. I am unsure about munch. I can't decide what to make of his vote to accept my proposal. I think I'd rather have TA or arch as the third member. I might very well reject this one, because arch will likely propose arch, lio, jimmmm. But then again, he might not include me on it because he doesn't trust me. I'm also a little worried that Jimmmmm is spy and passed the mission so that he could be on this mission too and sabotage this one.

liopoil · « **Reply #167 on:** May 07, 2013, 04:16:51 pm »

yes, I think I would much prefer it if arch or TA were on the mission.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #168 on:** May 07, 2013, 06:27:53 pm »

Quote from: Twistedarcher on May 07, 2013, 12:16:32 pm

Why Munch as the third member, Jim?

I thought the two people who already passed a mission plus one person who voted to accept it was a good starting point. Someone (Arch maybe?) seemed very against mail-mi. No one was saying much and I wasn't sure if I'd be around before the deadline.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #169 on:** May 07, 2013, 06:29:32 pm »

Quote from: liopoil on May 07, 2013, 03:43:46 pm

I'm also a little worried that Jimmmmm is spy and passed the mission so that he could be on this mission too and sabotage this one.

Why? If it's just because you don't know (if you're Resistance) then this sentence is meaningless.

liopoil · « **Reply #170 on:** May 07, 2013, 06:34:36 pm »

well, it's just something that I think would make you more likely to pass if you're spy, therefore it's more likely to be possible that you are spy.

Jimmmmm · « **Reply #171 on:** May 07, 2013, 06:36:16 pm »

You mean because I get to propose the next mission?

liopoil · « **Reply #172 on:** May 07, 2013, 06:48:52 pm »

exactly. And people would likely accept it.

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #173 on:** May 07, 2013, 08:25:50 pm »

I'm pretty sure one of Lio and JImmm is a spy, I just don't know who :/ Spy liopoil nominating resistance Jimmm would make sense...but then it could be the other way too...ack!

Or hopefully we're really lucky and you both are resistance and this game will be pretty easy

liopoil · « **Reply #174 on:** May 07, 2013, 08:26:40 pm »

I hope so too. However, I don't believe that Jimmmmm and munch are both resistance.

Dominion Strategy Forum

News:

Author Topic: Vanilla Resistance. (Read 60765 times)