Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58 59 ... 75  All

Author Topic: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Town wins!)  (Read 167647 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1400 on: June 12, 2013, 10:44:42 pm »

Hold up.
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1401 on: June 12, 2013, 10:45:29 pm »

If we hammer me, Town loses the game . I think we should go through, and have all 6 people say if they have ANY way they could have protected Sudgy from the night kill last night.

For starters:

I did not protect Sudgy from the nightkill last night.

If everyone comes up with a no, then there's NO explanation for Sudgy being alive.
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1402 on: June 12, 2013, 10:45:58 pm »

I accept you for a misguided IC!

Sorry, why would Sudgy be alive?

I hate to ask you to claim more, but did you prevent Sudgy from being killed last night?

If no one can claim any reason why Sudgy would be alive, then that means it's more likely he's scum.
You have been fishing for me to claim more and more about my role all day, way more than I was comfortable claiming. Now that I strongly suspect, dare I say know, that you are scum, I refuse to answer such inquiries and advice all other townies to do the same.

It's pretty obvious there is a plethora of roles that could cause the target of a night kill to live though.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1403 on: June 12, 2013, 10:46:24 pm »

If we hammer me, Town loses the game . I think we should go through, and have all 6 people say if they have ANY way they could have protected Sudgy from the night kill last night.

For starters:

I did not protect Sudgy from the nightkill last night.

If everyone comes up with a no, then there's NO explanation for Sudgy being alive.
Except we don't know what nkirbit might have done.
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1404 on: June 12, 2013, 10:47:03 pm »

Efhw, lets have ta claim and go from there.  :)
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1405 on: June 12, 2013, 10:47:22 pm »

I accept you for a misguided IC!

Sorry, why would Sudgy be alive?

I hate to ask you to claim more, but did you prevent Sudgy from being killed last night?

If no one can claim any reason why Sudgy would be alive, then that means it's more likely he's scum.
You have been fishing for me to claim more and more about my role all day, way more than I was comfortable claiming. Now that I strongly suspect, dare I say know, that you are scum, I refuse to answer such inquiries and advice all other townies to do the same.

It's pretty obvious there is a plethora of roles that could cause the target of a night kill to live though.

Right.

But if everyone claims no, and you are town, you will have to accept that no one protected Sudgy last night, correct? Unless you were the one to claim.

You can claim last, it doesn't really matter. I just want everyone to answer yes / no.

I am for claiming because I will not have us lose this game when there is information out there that WILL win the game for us.
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1406 on: June 12, 2013, 10:48:29 pm »

EFHW, I understand you want to hammer. But can you please wait until we have all the information out there we need?

I have a suspected idea for what the setup is in this game. I'm unsure on a couple of things, but please let me post it before I get lynched. At the very least, I get to see how close I got!
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1407 on: June 12, 2013, 10:49:04 pm »

raerae - where do you stand on TA claiming now?
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1408 on: June 12, 2013, 10:49:10 pm »

We do not know scum tried to kill sudgy though!

I'm pretty sure it's ta-raerae and want ta to claim so efhw can hammer.
Logged

raerae

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Shuffle iT Username: raerae
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1409 on: June 12, 2013, 10:49:18 pm »

WAIT A SECOND!!  Voting TA over voting me???  Who's scummy now.  Why is one of us, both of whom have been pushing damn hard for sudgy's lynch, more scummy than the other.  Analyzing the shit out of this wagon right now.

It's mail-mi, Eevee, and sudgy, otherwise known as the possible partner, the recently claimed lover, and the scummy lover.

Are we in a legitimate stalemate?

One more time, kids, why is TA the scummiest of us all?
If he was town, the team would have to be raerae-ehfw and either of you would have hammered him for the win long ago.

I still want to know the case on TA.  Like the reason you voted.  That thing.  I mean, our side has a case, yes we do, our side has a case, how 'bout you!?
It doesn't even matter anymore, scum has painted themselves in the corner. Despite, wasn't the cornerstone of your case liopoil's role meaning there must be scum in lovers? I've refuted that and I've explained why sudgy doesn't necessarily die in the night in a rmm game and why the people responsible wouldn't want to claim. Why is your side dodging my questions? Do you accept me for an ic?

Like what the actual case is on the person you are voting for???  Oh wait, that's your side.
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1410 on: June 12, 2013, 10:50:30 pm »

To start out with, I am Ophelia, X-shot commuter (is it important to say how many?). I also have a second power, but it's not one that I have used yet, and I'd rather not say it just in case I do survive.

When I said I could explain a missing night kill, that's how. I commuted last night. If scum targeted me, that explains the missing kill.

To start, I think we should consider if anyone else has an explanation for the missing kill. You might have another, but I'm guessing that you won't. I believe I was the NK target last night, and Nkirbit was the poison target last night.
Logged

raerae

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Shuffle iT Username: raerae
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1411 on: June 12, 2013, 10:51:19 pm »

raerae - where do you stand on TA claiming now?

EFHW, they still haven't produced a case on TA becuase there isn't one.  Don't hammer. 

I am willing to look at mail-mi, are you?  If not, who is TA's partner?
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1412 on: June 12, 2013, 10:51:45 pm »

Flavor, yadda yadda, I can choose to leave town and go wail by the river if I so desire. Haven't read Hamlet ever so not sure what her role in that play is, except that she's obviously a good guy.
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1413 on: June 12, 2013, 10:51:58 pm »

if raerae is not scum here then I don't know who ever was scum anywhere!

look, anything that happened before tonight is not even relevant. We got scum to paint themselves in the corner with ta continuing to push for sudgy while accepting me as an ic.
Logged

mail-mi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1298
  • Shuffle iT Username: mail-mi
  • Come play some Forum Mafia with us!
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1414 on: June 12, 2013, 10:52:19 pm »

I had no way to protect sudgy last night.

I do want a full claim from TA if we are going to lynch him.

PPE: nvm just got it.
Logged
I currently imagine mail-mi wearing a dark trenchcoat and a bowler hat, hunched over a bit, toothpick in his mouth, holding a gun in his pocket.  One bead of sweat trickling down his nose.

'And what is it that ye shall hope for? Behold I say unto you that ye shall have hope through the atonement of Christ and the power of his resurrection, to be raised unto life eternal, and this because of your faith in him according to the promise." - Moroni 7:41, the Book of Mormon

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1415 on: June 12, 2013, 10:52:55 pm »

if raerae is not scum here then I don't know who ever was scum anywhere!

look, anything that happened before tonight is not even relevant. We got scum to paint themselves in the corner with ta continuing to push for sudgy while accepting me as an ic.

Because you are town while Sudgy is scum! Even if you disagree, you HAVE to see where we're coming from on this. EFHW and Raerae have made the exact same argument, as well.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1416 on: June 12, 2013, 10:53:19 pm »

To start, I think we should consider if anyone else has an explanation for the missing kill.
nkirbit as lightening rod or bodyguard.
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1417 on: June 12, 2013, 10:53:35 pm »

Mail-mi did not protect sudgy last night.
I did not protect sudgy last night.
From his flavor claim, Sudgy did not protect sudgy last night.

Raerae, EFHW, did either of you protect Sudgy last night? Simple yes / no will suffice!
Logged

raerae

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Shuffle iT Username: raerae
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1418 on: June 12, 2013, 10:53:53 pm »

if raerae is not scum here then I don't know who ever was scum anywhere!

look, anything that happened before tonight is not even relevant. We got scum to paint themselves in the corner with ta continuing to push for sudgy while accepting me as an ic.

If you won't produce a case will you at least explain why you won't?  How am I scum for demanded you actually have a reason for voting the way you are?
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1419 on: June 12, 2013, 10:54:11 pm »

To start, I think we should consider if anyone else has an explanation for the missing kill.
nkirbit as lightening rod or bodyguard.

Oooh could be.
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1420 on: June 12, 2013, 10:54:39 pm »

That's a believable claim, but I don't see any other possible scum team. I wish people would stop claiming and just lynch TA (raerae I'm like sure of, TA I want to believe but can't see no way for him to be town)
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1421 on: June 12, 2013, 10:54:45 pm »

EFHW,

Do you actually think that I'm scum, or are you just hammering to get the game moving?

Logged

raerae

  • Thief
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Shuffle iT Username: raerae
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1422 on: June 12, 2013, 10:55:48 pm »

That's a believable claim, but I don't see any other possible scum team. I wish people would stop claiming and just lynch TA (raerae I'm like sure of, TA I want to believe but can't see no way for him to be town)

Case, case, case...case, case, case...we want a ca-ase, we need a ca-ase.
Logged

EFHW

  • Spy
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 81
  • Shuffle iT Username: EFHW
  • EFHW="ee-foo". Really, how else would you say it?
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1423 on: June 12, 2013, 10:56:24 pm »

Mail-mi did not protect sudgy last night.
I did not protect sudgy last night.
From his flavor claim, Sudgy did not protect sudgy last night.

Raerae, EFHW, did either of you protect Sudgy last night? Simple yes / no will suffice!
People should NOT be answering this question.  It's like giving scum a map of who to target.
Logged

Twistedarcher

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: RMM6 Redux - Shakespeare Mafia (Act II)
« Reply #1424 on: June 12, 2013, 10:56:42 pm »

Raerae, I have a question for you. You must know that I am town, or strongly believe that am I town. You also know that if I get lynched, we lose.

That being said, if you have ANY information in your claim that would help convince Eevee...I strongly encourage you to do so. I know I'm rolefishing, blahblah, but it's preferable to losing the game for me.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58 59 ... 75  All
 

Page created in 0.138 seconds with 20 queries.