I actually think yuma is voting for ash, but lets break this down.
I am thinking he is either voting for someone at (*) or his vote puts them at (*) so we need to look at his vote.
Vote Count 4.2
Mcmcsalot (5): Robz888, liopoil, Axxle, spiritbears, mail-mi
Robz888 (2): ashersky, mcmcsalot
[redacted] (2): yuma
Not voting (3): Dsell, Galzria, Morgrim7
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
hard deadline is Sunday May 19, 3:00am MDT
Count 4.2: yuma has to be voting for someone who already has 2 votes on him, this would be robz who is then in actuality at 3 votes. There is noone at 1 vote so yuma can't be a second vote on someone.
Vote Count 4.3
ashersky (1): Galzria
Mcmcsalot (5): Robz888, Axxle, spiritbears, mail-mi, liopoil
Robz888 (2): ashersky, mcmcsalot
[redacted] (2): yuma
Not voting (2): Dsell, Morgrim7
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
hard deadline is Sunday May 19, 3:00am MDT
I'm sending a prod to Morgrim now.
Count 4.3: If we follow our above rule yuma is still voting for robz who is actually at 3 votes. The other option here is that yuma's vote counted in the total next to his name, so he would be voting for ashersky putting him to the (2) that shows up for yuma.
Vote Count 4.4
ashersky (2): Galzria, mcmcsalot
Mcmcsalot (5): Robz888, Axxle, spiritbears, mail-mi, liopoil
Robz888 (1): ashersky
[redacted] (3): yuma
no lynch (1): Dsell
Not voting (1): Morgrim7
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
hard deadline is Sunday May 19, 3:00am MDT
Morgrim has been prodded a second time. If he does not respond, I am not sure what I will do. I would prefer not to modkill in this case, and technically he is not breaking any rules. But still... it's unfortunate.
Count 4.4: Now we get messed up there is noone at 3 votes so yuma cannot be a vote that doesn't show up. The second option works here, he could be still voting for ashersky putting him at the *3) that shows up next to yuma.
Hang on galz do you actually have a double vote? does it show up? If you do and it doesn't that explains everything, yuma is voting for a person at (*) In 4.2 he is voting for robz at (2) In 4.3 he is voting for ashersky who is actually at (3) because of your double vote, In 4.4 he is still on ashersky who is at (3) due to your double vote.
If you have no double vote I don't see a consistent pattern for yuma to be voting for anyone. 4.2 has noone for yuma to put to (2) and 4.4 has noone at (3)