What? I'm not saying yuma isn't one of the main drivers behind the Jimmm lynch. How does that mean he is automatically scum if Jimmm is town? Is it that anytime someone pushes a case on someone that flips town, you vote for that person, or if there something special about this case?
There needs to be accountability for pushing something so hard without concrete evidence (such as an investigation result, etc.), so that's part of it. He won't even consider others outside his named scum team of mcmc and jimmmmm. That kind of tunnel vision is bad town play at best, or smart scum play. He'll have the perfect out tomorrow: "why would scum push SO hard for a mislynch" he'll argue.
And this is why, I think.
Qué? So many things wrong with this....
One: "named scum team of mcmc and jimmmmm." I have never named mcmc and jimmm as a scum team. as I said to mcmc above I think they both are most likely to be scum, if you felt I implied otherwise, I am sorry, but that is never what I meant to say. I speculated on it at one point and asked that they provide reads on each other but quickly realized that mcmc was in fact voting for jimmmm
Two: "He won't even consider others outside." I am voting for you, I have voted for mail-mi. I heavily considered Ozle after you pointed out that he was off wagon, something that I had forgotten. Really the only people I am not considering are Insomniac, because I think he is town after I considered him, and people early on the Kooshie wagon.
Three: "That kind of tunnel vision is bad town play at best" As I say before I have considered other options... what about everyone else who has only voted for jimmmm all freaking day long?
Four: "or smart scum play" no... what you are really saying here is that it is bad scum play, that scum!yuma will then use to WIFOM everyone by saying, scum!yuma would never play that bad... except that scum!yuma doesn't use those type of meta arguments. That is the sort of argument that you use and which I find to be ridiculous and which I have criticized repeatedly... see this game in which I criticize jimmmm's meta-defense when he said he wouldn't be such bad scum as to kill xeiron. Those arguments hold no water and are consistently ignored.
Five: "concrete evidence" yes, my evidence isn't as strong as an investigation result. Obviously. But it is soooo much stronger than your weak meta arguments that you consistently apply and are currently applying. We have direct relationships between confirmed scum and townies. That is solid evidence. Maybe it isn't "concrete" like an investigation, but hey! we dont' have an investigation right now, so I am going off the most solid stuff we have.
Ash is scum. It doesn't look like anyone wants to join me though. Whatever. Either he is scum trying to protect his scum buddy jimmmm or he is scum letting jimmmmm get mislynched and then trying to get me mislynched tomorrow. <I am sure ash is going to have something bad to say about this last sentence, but hey, I'll let him say it... I dont' want to ruin the fun of letting him say it for himself>
Author
Topic: Mafia XXII: Bankers Beware -- GAME OVER, SCUM WIN (Read 224094 times)